Upload
timon-boyer
View
32
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
EMG Blind Spots: What Your Study Can Miss Disorders of the NMJ. W. David Arnold, MD AAPMR 2014. Outline. Review of Prototypical NMJ Disorder, Myasthenia Gravis, and the General Approach to NMJ Disorders - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
EMG Blind Spots: What Your Study Can Miss
Disorders of the NMJ
W. David Arnold, MDAAPMR 2014
Outline
• Review of Prototypical NMJ Disorder, Myasthenia Gravis, and the General Approach to NMJ Disorders
• Review a series of 4 Cases to Highlight Potential Pitfalls and Key Concepts in NMJ Edx studies
Case 1: “Proximal Limb Weakness”
• 18 year old woman presents with a progressive proximal limb weakness is sent to the EMG Lab
Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy?
• Examination:– 4 grade proximal limb weakness– Normal bulbar strength, sensation, and
reflexes
Case 1: NCS and EMG
• Normal median sensory and motor response
• EMG: short duration, small amplitude motor unit action potentials with early recruitment without fibrillations
Case 1: Proximal Limb Weakness (Cont.)
• EMG and NCS: Non-irritable myopathy
• Diagnostic consideration was given to a possible limb girdle muscular dystrophy
• Muscle Biopsy: normal • Thoughts?
Case 1: Additional Studies
• Repetitive ulnar nerve stimulation at 3 Hz
~50% decrement• SFEMGIncreased jitter and blocking
Follow up
Lab testing:– Elevated acetylcholine receptor
antibodies
Diagnosis: acetylocholine receptor antibody positive myasthenia gravis (MG)
Treatment: Excellent response to pyridostigmine and immunomodulatory treatments
338 charts of patients with NMJ disorders
6 patients underwent muscle biopsy for possible myopathy
2 with coexistent inflammatory muscle dz
4 with NMJ disorders mimicking myopathy (based on normal muscle bx)
Consider RNS in patients with weakness
Clinical Pearl of Case 1:
Ask the Correct Question
MG
• MG is the most common NMJ disorder• Prevalence of 20 in 100,000 and incidence
of 2 per 100,000. (Phillips Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003)
• Antibodies– Ach receptor antibodies (80%)– Muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) (10%)– Antibody negative (5%-10%)
• Treated with cholinesterase inhibitors and immunomodulatory treatments
NMJ Disorders: History• Weakness: proximal muscles with fatigability
– Severity of involvement: Ocular>bulbar>limb>respiratory
• Sensory: No sensory loss, paresthesia, or neuropathic pain
• Autonomic: dry mouth, blurry vision, impotence, constipation, and difficulty with urination– Some disorders such as Lambert Eaton
myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) and botulism
Generalized fatigue ≠ NMJ disorder
NMJ Disorders: Examination • Weakness in proximal limb, ocular, and
bulbar muscles– Distal or focal weakness may occur in
12% of MG (Wirtz et al 2002)
– Extraocular and bulbar weakness are early and prominent in MG and botulism
– Less prominent extraocular weakness in LEMS
• Reflexes are normal in postsynaptic disorders such as myasthenia gravis but characteristically absent or reduced in presynaptic NMJ d/o
• Sensory function is normal• Pupillary responses are usually reduced
in botulism
Post-synaptic NMJ disorders• Sensory NCS
-normal• Motor NCS
-usually normal CMAP amplitude
• EMG-Possibly short duration, low amplitude, unstable MUAP’s if severe (Jiggle)
• Slow RNS (3 Hz)-decrement
(60-80% of generalized MG)
• CMAP with 10 sec exercise(or Rapid RNS, 20-50 Hz)
-no increment• CMAP with Exercise
-no increment• SFEMG
-Jitter and blocking (95-98% MG)
(Nl jitter in weak muscle ≠ MG)
Post-synaptic NMJ disorder
Pre-synaptic NMJ disorderSensory NCS
-normalMotor NCS
-usually low CMAP amplitude
EMG-Possibly short duration, low amplitude, unstable MUAP’s if severe-some disorders with fibrillations (botulism)
Slow RNS (3 Hz)-decrement
CMAP with 10 sec exercise(or Rapid RNS, 20-50 Hz)
-increment 300% in one muscle or 100% in
three (diagnostic for Lambert Eaton MS)
SFEMG-Jitter and blocking
(jitter and blocking decrease with increasing firing rate)
Presynaptic NMJ
Pre-exercise
Post-exercise
350% increment following 10 seconds exercise
Case 2: Dysarthria• 64 year old woman with symptoms of
progressive dysarthria and facial weakness is sent to the EMG Lab
Possible myasthenia gravis?• Examination
– Mild facial and moderate tongue weakness– Tongue fasciculations– Normal limb strength– Generalized Brisk reflexes and jaw jerk
Case 2: Nerve Conduction Studies
Median and ulnar sensory responses are normalMedian and ulnar motor responses are normalRepetitive nerve stimulation at 3 Hz
-Orbicularis Oris with >20% decrementMyasthenia
Gravis?
Case 2: Electromyography
Single Fiber EMG-Increased jitter and blocking in frontalis and extensor digitorum
EMGFibrillations/fasciculations/dec recruitment/enlarged motor unit action potentials (mentalis and tongue)Limb muscles normal
Jitter and Blocking
Example: Post-synaptic NMJ disorder
Case 2
Clinical Pearl of Case 2:
Not all that Jitters is Myasthenia
the “False Positive” testAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & NMJ transmission defect• Severe decrement frequently seen on RNS (reported up
to 35% of CMAP amplitude) (I have seen up to 50%)• Increased decrement correlates with faster progression
and worse prognosis Daube 2004; Wang 2001
• SFEMG: increased jitter and block may be early finding, prior to denervation (also seen in early reinnervation)
• Axonal Stimulation SFEMG: lack of facilitation with increasing frequency of stimulation
Arimura 1995
Case 3: Seronegative MG
A 58 year old woman with a 30 year history of seronegative myasthenia gravis
PMH: poliomyelitis at age 6 requiring ventilation support in an iron lung for a month
PE: normal CN exam, severe proximal limb weakness with fatigability, normal sensation and reflexes
Case 3: Seronegative MG
• 3Hz RNS with up to 70% decrement in proximal muscles
• She describes dramatic improvement with pyridostigmine
• Worsening with prednisone
• No improvement with IVIG or PLEX
• Ideas?
Clinical Pearl of Case 3:Hoof beats (aka decrement)? Don’t assume
it is a horse (MG)
– Multiple NMJ disorders may fall within this clinical presentation• Seronegative (autoimmune) MG• Congenital Myasthenic syndromes• Other neuromuscular disorders with
secondary NMJ effects or clinical patterns similar to NMJ disorders
Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome
• Historical points in case 3 suggesting this possibility:– No clear response to
immunomodulation– Atypical phenotype
(Severe disease with minimal to no bulbar involvement)
– PMH of “polio” after which she states she was “normal” in every way until developing weakness in her 20’s
– On more direct questions she described being a “blue baby” at birth
• Electrodiagnosis of CMS
Case 4: MG second opinion
45 year old man with progressive ptosis, dysphagiaFH: mother with “seronegative myasthenia gravis”Examination: bilateral ptosis and extraocular muscle weakness without clear fatigability; mild proximal limb weakness
Antibody testing: AChR and MuSK Antibodies (-)
EMG and NCS: decrement on repetitive nerve stimulation studiesDiagnosed with seronegative myasthenia gravis but then had minimal response to immune therapies and pyridostigmine?
Ideas?
Case 4: Repeat EMG and NCS
• NCS: multiple mononeuropathies c/w the patient’s known HNPP
• RNS: normal• SFEMG: mildly increased jitter in
frontalis with no blocking• EMG: Short duration small
amplitude motor unit action potentials with sparse fibrillations in proximal limb and facial muscles
Case 4: Pre and Post Surgery Images
Clinical Pearl of Case 4: When in doubt, trust your exam… double
check technique
Movement artifact is significant challenge in repetitive nerve stimulation and can lead to false positive tests
Our patient: • Lacked clinical features of fatigability or response to
treatment• Diagnosed with oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy
(OPMD)– Autosomal dominant slowly progressive hereditary muscle disorder– GCG repeat expansion (8-13)– Often mistaken for seronegative MG– Typically later/less involvement of extraocular muscles
References1. Phillips LH, 2nd. The epidemiology of myasthenia gravis. Annals of the New York Academy
of Sciences. Sep 2003;998:407-412.2. Wirtz PW, van Dijk JG, van Doorn PA, et al. The epidemiology of the Lambert-Eaton
myasthenic syndrome in the Netherlands. Neurology. Jul 27 2004;63(2):397-398.3. Wirtz PW, Sotodeh M, Nijnuis M, et al. Difference in distribution of muscle weakness
between myasthenia gravis and the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. Dec 2002;73(6):766-768.
4. Mongiovi PC, Elsheikh B, Lawson VH, Kissel JT, Arnold WD. Neuromuscular junction disorders mimicking myopathy. Muscle & nerve. Nov 2014.
5. Stalberg EV, Sonoo M. Assessment of variability in the shape of the motor unit action potential, the "jiggle," at consecutive discharges. Muscle & nerve. Oct 1994;17(10):1135-1144.
6. Baslo MB, Deymeer F, Serdaroglu P, Parman Y, Ozdemir C, Cuttini M. Decrement pattern in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome is different from myasthenia gravis. Neuromuscular disorders : NMD. Jul 2006;16(7):454-458.
7. Sanders DB, Cao L, Massey JM, Juel VC, Hobson-Webb L, Guptill JT. Is the decremental pattern in Lambert-Eaton syndrome different from that in myasthenia gravis? Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Jun 2014;125(6):1274-1277.
8. Practice parameter for repetitive nerve stimulation and single fiber EMG evaluation of adults with suspected myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: summary statement. Muscle & nerve. Sep 2001;24(9):1236-1238.