Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ECONOMETRIX | Leaders in Economic Insight
ELECTRICITY & EMPLOYMENTTHE KEY TO SOUTH AFRICA’S
ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL PROSPERITY
ROB JEFFREY MANAGING DIRECTOR ECONOMETRIX (PTY) LTD
ECONOMETRIX | Leaders in Economic Insight
MAJOR TRENDS AFFECTING
FUTURE SOUTH AFRICAN
ECONOMIC GROWTH
RELATIVELY POOR ECONOMIC GROWTH
RELATIVE DECLINE IN IMPORTANCE IN AFRICA
GOODS PRODUCING SECTORS ARE LAGGING
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08
%
(Shares of GDP)
Primary Secondary Tertiary Financial
SECTORAL EMPLOYMENT TRENDS
2006-2012
TOTAL 239 000
Mining 44 000
Manufacturing -179 000
Electricity, Gas & Water 9 000
Construction -29 000
Trade, Hotels & Non-Financial Services -30 000
Transport & Communications 19 000
Financial & Business Services 42 000
Community Services 363 000
MINING PRODUCTION GROWTH DECLINE
EXCESSIVE IMPORTS AND INSUFFICIENT EXPORTS
UNACCEPTABLY HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT
INCREASING SOCIAL COSTS¨ Access to social grants to rise to 16.8m by 2014¨ 6.2m registered taxpayers¨ 4.5% of taxpayers account for 37.3% of personal tax
POLICY REQUIREMENTS FOR SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH
v Balanced Growth - Importance of mining, mineralresources, industry, agriculture & infrastructure
vCreate environment to increase domestic and foreigninvestment in manufacturing, mining, agriculture &processing industriesvNational Development Plan maps future economic
growth policy requirementsvINCREASE IN ENERGY SUPPLY§ Base load electricity§ Security of supply§ Reasonable and competitive price
ECONOMETRIX | Leaders in Economic Insight
SA’S ELECTRICITY
GENERATING
REQUIREMENTS
ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND INCOME
INDICES OF ECONOMIC PRODUCTION AND ENERGY INDICATORS IN SOUTH AFRICA
SA IS A NET IMPORTER OF ENERGY?
§ Energy imports :§ Crude oil§ Refined petroleum products§ Natural Gas (Mozambique)§ Electricity from Mozambique
§ Energy exports :§Refined and synthetic petroleum products§Electricity – predominantly to MozambiquevCoal?
PROBABLE FUTURE GROWTHWORLD ENERGY SOURCES
ECONOMETRIX | Leaders in Economic Insight
SA ELECTRICITY
GENERATING
REQUIREMENTS
SOUTH AFRICA’S ENERGY AND ELECTRICITY SOURCES
SECTORAL ELECTRICITY INTENSITY
Electricity intensity
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008
kWh
/ Ran
d
MiningManufacAgricResidTranspComm
ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENERGY REQUIREMENTS
3 GDP growth scenarios
Increasing Energy efficiency assumed at 1% pa
7%pa growth scenario achieves average growth of 6.77% pa by 2035
GDP Electricity Liquid Fuels
Rbn Gwh BOE Tbd
2010 Actual 2,406 238,272 508
2035, 3% pa GDP Growth 5,038 395,713 633
2035, 4.35% pa GDP Growth 7,231 729,799 857
2035, 7% pa GDP Growth 12,384 1,366,949 1466
SOUTH AFRICA’S ELECTRICITY PLAN
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000
China
USA
Russia
India
Japan
Germany
Canada
UK
Iran
Korea
Italy
Mexico
Australia
Saudi Arabia
Indonesia
France
Brazil
South Africa
Spain
Ukraine
Million tons CO2
RELATIVE COST OF ABATEMENT VERY
VERY HIGH
SA responsible for 1.1% of total global CO2 emissions
SOUTH AFRICA IN ABSOLUTE TERMS IS VERY VERY SMALL
Source IEA - Top 20 CO2 Country emitters, 2008
§ Market share of fossil fuels will decline & the sharesupplied by sustainable clean electricity will grow§ Alternative electricity sources (such as solar, wind
& wave) will currently continue to have limitedlarge-scale base load electricity supply viability§ Coal nuclear and now potentially gas power
currently only technologies available to offerlarge-scale base load electricity source for SAindustrial economy.
ENERGY SOURCES - LONG TERM TRENDS
ECONOMETRIX | Leaders in Economic Insight
COMPARATIVE COST OF
ELECTRICITY BY
GENERATING SOURCE
§ Low Load Factors§Wind and solar have very low load factors§Wind Load factor (capacity factor) of between 20% to
30%§ Unreliable and unpredictable§ Fallacy that “the wind is always blowing somewhere”§ Blowing strongly enough to provide useful energy§ Wind and solar power for grid electricity depend
on subsidies.
FUNDAMENTAL WEAKNESSES OF RENEWABLES FOR GRID ELECTRICITY
WIND ELECTRICITY GENERATION IN 7 COUNTRIES OF WEST EUROPE
Variations of wind production from September 2010 to March 2011
This figure presents the cumulative power generated in:Ireland Spain Germany Denmark Britain France AustriaGermany and Spain together represent 75% of total power & hence it does not necessarily give a sufficiently clear long term view of European wind production variations
Parsons Brinckerhoff: Increase cost by 30% to 40%Colin Gibson, National Grid Group:
§ Extra System Costs: Fast response plant toaddress intermittency§ Planning Reserve: Maintain underutilised
conventional plant for peak power & low output§ Required transmission: Additional cost of
transferring power from windsitesvEnvironmental: Wild life & birds, roads soil & habitat
damage, unsightly, noise, health
ADDITIONAL COSTS OF WIND
LGC INCLUDING ADDITIONAL COSTS
REAL PRICES FOR GERMAN & FRENCH HOUSEHOLD ELECTRICITY
E U RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY PRICES
ECONOMETRIX | Leaders in Economic Insight
POTENTIAL IMPACT OF
KAROO SHALE GAS
DEPOSITS
LICENCE AREAS AND AREAS UNDER MORATORIUM
REVIEW OF SHALE GAS ESTIMATES
Kuuskraa et al. (2011) for US EIA: 485 TcfWhat does this number mean?
485 Trillion (1012) cubic feet of gas≈ 511 ExaJoules (1018 J) of energy
≈ 122 billion tons of TNT
≈ 365 X the energy of the Tohuku, Japan earthquake in 2011
≈ 190 times South Africa’s total energy use in 2006
≈ 22 times US annual gas production in 2010
≈ a very large gas find
POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS FOR GAS
§ Six main application clusters for natural gas:§Exporting the gas§ Industrial, commercial and domestic energy§For electricity generation§Use as an automotive fuel§Conversion to liquid fuels, and§Energy feedstock for fertilizer production
§ Is natural gas (from shale) a lower carbon substitute for coal?
GAS EMISSIONS CLEANER THAN COAL
+10 % Revision Gas still 48% cleaner than coal
BENEFITS TO THE US§ Production increase since 2005: 28%§ Share of Production:§ 2008: 11% 2035: 60%§ Employment in shale gas: 600000§ Contribution to GDP by 2015 $118 billion§ Price of dry gas fell from $5.78 to $2 per m BTU§ Supply for 100 yearsvWill become almost self-sufficient in oil and gas by 2035vWill overtake Russia in gas production by 2015vWill overtake Saudi Arabia in oil production by 2017
MAJOR PROJECT COMPARISON
Major Project Comparison: Summary
Sasol Motor Industry
Power Station build
potential
Karoo Shale Gas (50 TCF)
Karoo Shale Gas (20 TCF)
GDP R60bn R160 bn R78 bn R200 bn R80 bn
Employment 194,000 500,000 600,000 704,000 293,000
Dependents 0.8 million 2.0 million 2.4 million 2.8 million 1.2 million
ECONOMETRIX | Leaders in Economic Insight
KEY SA POLICY OBJECTIVES
AND COMPETITIVE ISSUES
SOUTH AFRICAN POLICY OBJECTIVES
¨ Alleviating poverty & creating employment ¤ By increasing the economic growth rate
¨ Focusing on developing goods-producing industries ¤ Boost exports and reduce imports¤More labour-intensive and less skills-intensive. ¤ Best for reducing unemployment amongst less skilled
¨ Improving productivity to be globally competitive¤ Assist exports¤ Reduce imports through import replacement¤ Increase employment and reduce unemployment
CRITICAL COMPETITIVE ISSUESAs set out in the National Development Plan South Africa
needs to focus on three critical components¨ Effective and efficient infrastructure¤ Reliable source of base load electricity¤ Good transport system
¨ Efficient and skilled labour force¤ Education and skills training¤ Labour laws that allow the efficient and flexible use of
labour.¨ Focus on efficiency and reducing all input costs¤ Ensuring global competitiveness.
ECONOMETRIX | Leaders in Economic Insight
IMPACTS OF HIGHER
ELECTRICITY PRICES ON THE
SA ECONOMY
REASONS AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF HIGHER ELECTRICITY PRICES
The cause is the rapid change towards renewables which contributes towards a global reduction in carbon emissions
¨ SA is more reliant on coal for energy relative to othercountries, the tax has a far greater economic cost to SA
¨ Electricity supply is not flexible to alternative sources ofsupply & the additional cost causes significantly higher prices
¨ The increase required in the cost of electricity amount tomore than 30%+ over and above normal inflation by 2021.
¨ This will for South Africa:¤ Have inflationary consequences¤ Raises costs¤ Undermine SA’s global competitiveness
REDUCTION IN GROWTH POTENTIAL OF SA ECONOMY
§ Reduction in GDP by 2021: - 3.0%§ GDP reduction by 2021: - R81 billion§ Reduction in GDP growth: -0.4% p.a.§ Reduction in employment by 2021: - 5.7%§ Reduction in employment by 2021: -700000 jobs§ Reduction in employment growth: -0,7% p.a.§ Reduction in employment growth: -87500 p.a.§ Dependents affected by 2021:2.8 million dependents§ Decreases exports§ Increase imports§ Substantial negative impact on balance of payments
REDUCTION IN GROWTH OF MINING SECTOR
§ Reduction in GDP by 2021: - 3.6%§ GDP reduction by 2021: - R9.6 billion§ Reduction in GDP growth: -0.5% p.a.§ Reduction in employment by 2021: - 7.1%§ Reduction in employment by 2021:-23000 jobs§ Reduction in employment growth: -0,9% p.a.§ Reduction in employment growth: -2800 p.a.§ Dependents affected by 2021: -92000 dependents
REDUCTION IN GROWTH OF MANUFACTURING SECTOR
§ Reduction in GDP by 2021: -1.6%.§ GDP reduction by 2021: -R5.7 billion§ Reduction in GDP growth: -0.2% p.a.§ Reduction in employment by 2021: -3.5%§ Reduction in employment by 2021: -62000 jobs§ Reduction in employment growth: -0.4% p.a.§ Reduction in employment growth: -7700 p.a.§ Dependents affected by 2021:-248000 dependents
IMPACT ON SA CITIZENSTotal burden of increased costs of electricity
¨ Additional 700000 people out of work. ¤ Loss of incomes: R50 billion
¨ Additional social benefits to be paid by taxpayers:¤ Social benefits costs: R17 billion
¨ Additional inflation costs to be paid by citizens : ¤ Inflationary costs R17 billion.
¨ Total increased cost to country¤ Paid by SA citizens: R84 billion pa
¨ Amount to be paid on average by SA citizen ¤ Additional cost per citizen: R6400 pa
ECONOMETRIX | Leaders in Economic Insight
RENEWABLES &
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONCERNS
LAND UTILISATION
USE OF RESOURCES
BIRDS AND BATS
Source IEA - Top 20 CO2 Country emitters, 2008
• Wind turbines kill more than 573,000 birds each year in the
USA, including federally protected species like bald eagles
and golden eagles
• The Pennsylvania Game Commission estimates that more
than 10,000 bats are killed in the state each year by wind
turbines,
• Almost 10,000 birds die each year beneath the wind-turbine
blades at Altamont pass,
• Believed that possibly decline in bee population could be
connected to wind turbines
BIRD DEATHS FROM WIND TURBINE
ECONOMETRIX | Leaders in Economic Insight
INCREASING GLOBAL
CONCERNS
GROWING GOVERNMENT AND CITIZEN CONCERNS AND QUESTIONS
¨ Global warming is not necessarily taking place¤ Observable contradictions between actual climate trends and predictions based
upon IPCC models¤ Questions regarding costs and benefits of environmental issues
¨ Many countries are questioning policies and slowing implementation¤ Countries questioning policies include Poland, together with southern and
eastern European allies. U.K. Australia and USA. ¨ Citizens are disgruntled and questioning government’s policies because of
¤ Costs and uncertain benefits in an age of austerity ¤ Consider money being squandered on “renewable energy” fiascos premised
upon climate alarmism along with empty promises of environmental, employment, and energy security benefits.
¤ Geen energy subsidies, domestic fossil development impediments, and runaway EPA regulatory policies drive up fuel and electricity costs, food prices, federal debt, and monetary inflation.
VOSTOK ICE HISTORY
Source IEA - Top 20 CO2 Country emitters, 2008
TEMPERATURE HISTORY
Source IEA - Top 20 CO2 Country emitters, 2008
TEMPERATURE HISTORY
Source IEA - Top 20 CO2 Country emitters, 2008
TEMPERATURE FORECASTS
Source IEA - Top 20 CO2 Country emitters, 2008
ECONOMETRIX | Leaders in Economic Insight
SUMMARY
AND
CONCLUSIONS
SUMMARY¨ SA contributes only 1.1% of global emissions. SA’s contribution to reduction
of global emissions is extremely small.
¨ Countries implementing measures are at a different stage of economicdevelopment & less carbon intensive than SA.
¨ The more carbon-intensive a country, the greater the economic cost ofreducing carbon emissions.
¨ The number of countries reconsidering their obligations because of highcosts is increasing.
¨ Higher costs in SA will place country at considerable competitivedisadvantage relative to its competitors.
¨ Higher costs will slow economic growth, increase unemployment, increaseuncertainty & reduce investment.
¨ Impact of not increasing energy growth from resources offering competitiveadvantage will be felt primarily by the poor.
ELECTRICITY CAPACITY GROWTH AND COMPETITIVE PRICING ESSENTIAL
Business and hence employment growth requires electricity security at competitive prices
§ Essential for SA developmental requirements§ Increasing employment§ Poverty alleviation§ Raising the standard of living
ELECTRICITY & EMPLOYMENT GROWTH ARETHE KEY TO SOUTH AFRICA’S ECONOMIC,
SOCIAL AND POLITICAL PROSPERITY
ECONOMETRIX | Leaders in Economic Insight
THANK YOU