32
MetrixIDR Five-Minute Modeling Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

MetrixIDR Five-Minute ModelingElectric Reliability Council of Texas

February 2015

Page 2: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

2

Overview

» Five-Minute Modeling Pre-Process• Filtering the data• Smoothing the data (TOU Parameters)

» Five Minute Module Base Framework• Level Model• Ramp Rate Model• Day Ahead Model• Blending Issues

» Other Modeling Considerations• Cross Day Bias• Forecast Overrides

Page 3: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

3

Load Noise Creates Forecast Instability

Page 4: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

4

Goal is Forecast Stability

Page 5: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

5

Eliminating Data Outliers

» The first task is to eliminate data outliers

» MetrixIDR has two main methods for eliminating data outliers:

1. Meter Validation Parameters• Comprehensive set of validation options• Validation is not model dependent, i.e., how well the data are

validated is not dependent upon the selected model’s performance

• Typically the more preferred of the two methods

2. Modified Kalman Filter• Validation is model dependent

Page 6: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

6

Eliminating Data Outliers

Page 7: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

7

Page 8: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

8

Page 9: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

9

Page 10: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

10

Smooth the Data

» The second task is to smooth the data using an Augmented Savitsky-Golay (SG) Filter to dampen random measurement noise

• Removes unnecessary movements in the forecast horizon• Estimating with smoothed data allows for smooth coefficients

Page 11: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

11

Page 12: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

12

Page 13: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

Smoothing ParametersSavitsky-Golay Weights capture bends in the moving average process

13

Page 14: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

14

Smoothing Parameters Issue

» The issue with smoothing is smoothing parameters create bias at the end of the actual data series because the smoothing is “centered”

Page 15: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

15

Page 16: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

16

» Enabling “Lift” essentially applies a ratio using polynomial weights and observations from previous intervals to compute future intervals

Smoothing Parameters Lift

Page 17: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

17

Page 18: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

Smoothing Parameters Lift

Lift

Only applied interval where a full centered moving average cannot be calculated.

Examples:

1. No DOW, Lift Days = 1

Obtain average correction factors between the smoothed series without future values and the actual using only the prior day (Lift Days = 1, No DOW), same time interval and correct the current day intervals.

2. DOW, Lift Days = 2

Obtain average correction factors based on the same time interval, same day of the week in the prior two weeks (Lift Days = 2, Yes DOW).

18

Page 19: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

Viewing the Smoothed Data

19

Smoothed, “filtered” data cuts through the noise

Page 20: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

20

Overview

» Five-Minute Modeling Pre-Process• Filtering the data• Smoothing the data (TOU Parameters)

» Five Minute Module Base Framework• Level Model• Ramp Rate Model• Day Ahead Model• Blending Issues

» Other Modeling Considerations• Cross Day Bias• Forecast Overrides

Page 21: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

21

Advantages to Five-Minute Modeling Framework

» Level Model• Focus on very short term• Tends to be autoregressive

» Ramp Model• Focus on changes and ramp periods of time

» Day Ahead Model• Captures all possible variables• Provides shape for the day

» Blending• Allows for different focuses based on time of use

Page 22: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

22

Framework: Level Model

Y is Load (MW)

Issues:• Very short-term• Lag Loads should dominate the model effect• Lag Loads are needed to launch the forecast off the last actual• Autoregressive models tend to perform poorly in the long term

Yt = f (Yt-1,Xt)

Other X variables help model as a fine adjustment to the lag relationship

Page 23: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

June Morning Hours

600.00

800.00

1,000.00

1,200.00

1,400.00

1,600.00

1,800.00

2,000.00

2,200.00

2,400.00

1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101 106 111 116 121 126 131 136 141

4:15am5:15am

6:15am7:15am

Load Space Example

23

Page 24: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

Framework: Ramp Model

Y is change in Load(MW)

Issues:• Ramp rate forecast continues from Level forecast or last actual value• Stability is based on movement of the last actual value• Autoregressive variables tend to be weaker • Autoregressive variables create a Yt = f (Yt-1, Yt-2) relationship

Yt = f (Yt-1,Xt) or

X variables are used to define the varying shape through the year

Yt = f (Xt)

24

Page 25: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

June Morning Hours

-70.00

-50.00

-30.00

-10.00

10.00

30.00

50.00

1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101 106 111 116 121 126 131 136 141

4:15am

5:15am 6:15am7:15am

Ramp Rate Space Example

25

Page 26: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

Framework: Day Ahead

Y is Load (MW)

Issues:• Day Ahead models tend to be stable throughout the day• Typically used for next day forecasting, but may contain current day

components as well

X variables are used to define both the level and shape for the day

Yt = f (Xt)

26

Page 27: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

Level + Ramp Rate + Day Ahead Forecast

27

Page 28: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

28

Model Issues

» Y Variable• Should I smooth Y before estimation?

» Level Model• How many periods should I lag?• How long should this model be applied?

» Ramp Model• Do I need lag variables?• How do I capture seasonal shapes?• How long should this model be applied?

» Day Ahead Model• What is the original purpose of the Day Ahead Model?• How far in the future should the model be applied?

Page 29: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

29

Overview

» Five-Minute Modeling Pre-Process• Filtering the data• Smoothing the data (TOU Parameters)

» Five Minute Module Base Framework• Level Model• Ramp Rate Model• Day Ahead Model• Blending Issues

» Other Modeling Considerations• Cross Day Bias• Forecast Overrides

Page 30: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

Cross Day Bias Adjustment

» The Cross Day Bias Adjustment is a post-forecast adjustment» Once MetrixIDR completes the five-minute forecast, MetrixIDR will adjust

the forecast based on a historical set of adjustment factors

Step 1: Calculate Forecast Errors

Step 2: Average Errors

Step 3: Calculate the Bias

Step 4: Apply the Bias

Use Centered Moving Average

Use Adjustment Weights

30

Page 31: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

31

Page 32: Electric Reliability Council of Texas February 2015

THANK YOU

www.itron.com

ITRON SAN DIEGO

12348 High Bluff Drive, Suite 210

San Diego, CA 92130

858 724 2620

858 724 2690