Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Effects of Vacuum Annealing on the ChargeDischarge Characteristicsof Eutectic AlSi/Al Thin Film as Anode Material for Li-Ion Batteries
Chao-Han Wu, Truan-Sheng Lui, Fei-Yi Hung+ and Li-Hui Chen
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 701, R. O. China
In this study, radio frequency magnetron sputtering was used to prepare eutectic AlSi/Al bi-layered films as anode materials and the effectof vacuum annealing in the chargedischarge capacity characteristics at different temperatures were discussed. For the purpose of 400 nm AlSifilm can possess the lowest crystallization temperature, the eutectic composition was adopted. The pre-sputtered 40 nm Al thin film not onlyreduced the resistivity of the composite anode film, but also diffused to prevent peeling between the AlSi films and Cu foils after vacuumannealing. While the annealing temperatures were elevated (RT ³ 400°C), indexes of crystalline (IOC) and resistivities of specimens werechanged. The properties of materials containing ASEC-400 (at RT) and ASEC-200 (at 55°C) had outstanding chargedischarge characteristics.The morphology transformation at the surface and cross section resulted from annealing at different temperatures and cycling testing wereexamined by Focus Ion Beam (FIB). Besides, the relationship between cycling performances and electrochemical characteristics of AlSi/Alfilm anodes were also investigated by Cyclic Voltammetry and Electrochemical AC Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS).[doi:10.2320/matertrans.M2012086]
(Received March 6, 2012; Accepted June 13, 2012; Published August 25, 2012)
Keywords: aluminumsilicon, anode material, chargedischarge
1. Introduction
Many alloy systems are being developed to replacegraphite as the anode in lithium rechargeable batteries dueto their better capacity (SnCu14) · LiSn5) · CuSb6) · MgSi7) · LiSi8)). Si-based intermetallic compounds possessmarvelous capacity (Li4.4Si: 4200mAh/g) and have beeninvestigated continuously. In addition to Si, Al has becomeattractive gradually owing to its excellent capacity (Li2.25Al:2235mAh/g). Comparing with Si, the ratio of Li/Al is 2.25when the maximum storage for Li of Al has been reached. Itmeans that Al suffers less impact resulted from the insertingof Li ions than Si does. But Al still hasn’t possessed wellcycleability yet and low irreversible capacity without anydoping because the anode has to be inserted/extracted by Liions at a single voltage. Doping the second element in Alcan improve the above problems very well. Some Al-basedsystem like AlC,9) AlFe10) and AlSn11) has been revealedso far.
On account of the above mentioned reasons, the anodematerial was prepared by sputtering Al-based binary film onthe Cu foil. Si was adopted as the second element becauseof its wonderful capacity. The main lithiation product of Siis the IMC, Li22Si5. Comparing that of Al(LiAl), Si has toundergo more violent volume variation (4.4 : 1 vs. 1 : 1)during main lithiation/delothiation process than Al does.Although Si is more unfavorable as the anode matrix mate-rial than Al is, it’s still a suitable choice for the secondelement in the active-active system like AlSi. The systemwon’t only suffer too much volume variation at a singlevoltage, but also let both elements contribute to overallcapacity.
According to the Ref. 12), it revealed that Al filled thechinks at the Al/Cu interface after annealing. It means thatenhancing interface joint and the vertical conductivity of the
anode material are reached after annealing. That’s the reasonwhy the 40 nm pre-sputtered Al layer was adopted. Besides,this paper used lower annealing temperatures to elevate IOCof samples because the AlSi eutectic-composed materialspossess lower crystallization temperature. Also, the relation-ship among IOC, resistivities, cycled morphorlogies andelectrochemical properties were investigated.
2. Experimental Procedures
In this study, Al/eutectic AlSi dual layered films weresputtered on 10 µm Cu foil. The thicknesses of unary andbinary film were 40 and 400 nm. ASEC-AD (AlSi(400 nm)/Al(40 nm)/Cu(10 µm)) is defined as the as-deposited sample.Some ASEC-AD films were annealed at 200 and 400°C for1 h in vacuum and are designated ASEC-200 and ASEC-400.Each film was cut for the chargedischarge testing. Thecomposition of the electrolyte was LiPF6 + EC + DEC(EC : DEC = 1 : 1 vol).
The micro-morphology and interface characteristics ofthe pre- and post-cycling samples were investigated by SEMand FIB (focused ion beam). The phases and IOC of theun-annealed and annealed films were analyzed by thin-filmXRD. The angle of incidence was 1°. The velocity ofscanning was 4°/min and the range was from 20 to 100°.A constant current rate, 0.1C, was used for electrochemicaltest with 20 cycles (1st10th at room temperature, 11th20that high temperature, 55°C). The voltage was limited to therange 0.011.5V. Electrochemical AC Impedance Spec-troscopy (EIS) analysis was conducted at the voltage of0.01V as the end of 10th and 20th lithiation stage. Thepotential amplitude was set to be 10mV and the scanningfrequency was ranged from 100 kHz to 10mHz. CyclicVoltammetry measurements were performed with the scan-ning rate of 0.05mV/s. In addition, the resistivity wasmeasured using a four-point probe and each datum wasaverage of 10 test results.+Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected]
Materials Transactions, Vol. 53, No. 9 (2012) pp. 1669 to 1673©2012 The Japan Institute of Metals
3. Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows the surface and cross-section character-istics of ASEC-AD and dense deposition are observed onimages. EDS analysis on the upper binary layer of ASEC-ADis shown in Table 1. In Fig. 2, grazing-incident XRDconfirmed the peaks of Al and Cu foil but the peaks of Sididn’t appear. The result also took place in some formerstudies. Some explanations for it are that Si within the film isnanostructure and its grain size is too tiny to be detected.13)
The others consider that the amorphous structure of Si causesthe situation.14,15) Based on the Ref. 16), the indexes ofcrystalline (IOC) of materials were proportional to integra-tions of XRD diffraction peaks. In Fig. 2 and Table 2, itrevealed that IOC of Al within samples was raised withincreased annealing temperatures. The diffraction peaks of Si
appeared after 400°C vacuum annealing. It means that thepartial Si in ASEC-400 matrix transformed into the crystallinestate from amorphous state.
The resistivities of samples are shown in Fig. 3. IOC ofthin film was inversely proportional to its resistivity.17) Itrevealed that the resistivity of ASEC-AD was higher than thatof others. Largest standard deviation means there’s still lotsof amorphous areas in as-deposited matrix. After 200°C-1 hvacuum annealing, both resistivity and standard deviationchanged obviously. While 400°C-1 h vacuum annealing wascarried out, not only resistivity but also standard deviation
(a)
(b)
Pt
Cu foil
AlSi
Al
Fig. 1 SEM photographs: (a) surface and (b) cross section of ASEC-AD.
Table 1 EDS analysis of AlSi layer.
Al at% Si at%
ASEC-AD 87.7 12.3
20 40 60 802θ
Inte
nsi
ty
ASEC-AD
ASEC-200
ASEC-400
AlCuSi
Fig. 2 GI-XRD analysis of specimens.
Table 2 Detail data of Al(111) in Fig. 2.
FWHM(°)
Average grainsize (nm)
Integration areaof Al(111)
ASEC-AD 0.38 21.7 108.6
ASEC-200 0.34 24.7 158.3
ASEC-400 0.40 21.6 506.6
0
0.0002
0.0004
0.0006
Res
isti
vity
(Ω
−cm
)
ASEC-AD ASEC-200 ASEC-400
Fig. 3 Resistivities of specimens.
C.-H. Wu, T.-S. Lui, F.-Y. Hung and L.-H. Chen1670
were reduced startlingly. Based on the above reason, it’ssupposed that the area of crystalline shows the overwhelmingmajority in ASEC-400 matrix.
The cycling performances of specimens at differenttemperatures are plotted in Fig. 4. The delithiation capacityand the retention of ASEC-400 specimen were outstanding atRT but there was an evident decay in both of them at 55°C.Different from ASEC-400, ASEC-200 presented very well athigher temperature. Figure 5 shows that the three samples allhad an abrupt decay with various degrees at 11th cycle inCoulombic efficiency. The ultra-low resistivity and enhanceddriving force (a higher temperature is helpful to the lithiumions migration through SEI and the charge transfer) weresupplied by higher temperature to make lithiation reactionsgo beyond the limit of ASEC-400 specimen. AppropriateIOC and resistivity may be the reasons that the ASEC-200specimen had better chargedischarge characteristics at 55°Cbecause they prevent sample from disintegration whichoverload lithiation led to.
The electrochemical behaviors of all samples were studiedby Cyclic Voltammetry as shown in Fig. 6. Based on theRefs. 15, 18), the lithiation/delithiation voltage of Al is0.2V/0.48V and that of Si is 0.05V/0.3V. ASEC-400 filmand ASEC-200 film possessed more intensive redox peaksthan others at different temperatures. It was implied that thetwo samples lithiated and delithiated more actively thanothers at RT and 55°C. The fact is also corresponsive inconcert with their performances on capacity, retention andcoulombic efficiency. In Fig. 7, it shows that both ASEC-ADfilm and ASEC-200 film have more obvious redox peaks at55°C. The main delithiation peak of ASEC-400 film at 55°Cdecayed about 58% comparing with the specimen of RT.It indicated that it’s difficult for ASEC-400 film to delithiateat reactive voltages in this stage. The above fact could besupposed the reason why the capacity of specimen faded.Besides, the fewer potential differences between lithiationand delithiation peaks for all specimens at 55°C than those atRT. So, lower electrode polarization and higher lithium-iondiffusivity appeared in anode material at 55°C.19)
Figure 8 shows the comparison of 10th and 20th cycle’sNyquist plots (ZA vs. ZAA) at 0.01V. ZA and ZAAwithin the plotsindicated the real and imaginary parts of the cell impedance.Nyquist plots contained an obvious semicircle in high
0 4 8 12 16 20Cycles
0
200
400
600
800
Del
ith
iati
on
Cap
acit
y (m
Ah
/g)
RT HT
ASEC-ADASEC-200ASEC-400
Fig. 4 Delithiation capacities as a function of cycle number.
0 4 8 12 16 20Cycles
50
60
70
80
90
100
Co
ulo
mb
Eff
icie
ncy
(%
)
RT HT
ASEC-ADASEC-200
ASEC-400
Fig. 5 Coulomb efficiency as a function of cycle number.
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6Potential (V)
-0.0001
-5E-005
0
5E-005
0.0001
Cu
rren
t (A
)
ASEC-AD
ASEC-200ASEC-400
(a)
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6Potential (V)
-0.0002
0
0.0002
Cu
rren
t (A
)
ASEC-AD
ASEC-200
ASEC-400
(b)
10th cycle at RT
20th cycle at 55°C
Fig. 6 Cyclic voltammograms of specimens: (a) RT, (b) 55°C.
Effects of Vacuum Annealing on the ChargeDischarge Characteristics of Eutectic AlSi/Al Thin Film 1671
frequency, a vague one in middle frequency and an obliquestraight line in low frequency. The three parts represented theresistance of solid electrolyte interface (SEI), Rsei, the charge-transfer resistance, Rct, and Warburg impedance whichreflected the solid state diffusion of Li-ions into the bulk ofsample. The slope of the fitting line plotted in ZA or ZAA vs.½¹1/2 (the augular frequency) in low frequency was known
as Warburg factor ·. It’s inversely proportional to the halfsquare of diffusion coefficient. Rsei is related to the migrationof lithium-ions within SEI.20) At RT, the Rsei fitted of threesamples were 165³ (ASEC-AD), 437³ (ASEC-200) and680³ (ASEC-AD). It seems that higher IOC would promotethe formation of SEI and lead to obstacle to lithium-ionsmigration in this stage. The measurement of Rct showedthe consequence: ASEC-200 > ASEC-400 > ASEC-AD. It’ssuggested that crystalline Al and amorphous Si are beneficialto lithiation and delithiation. ASEC-400 film possessed thelowest · at RT and ASEC-200 film owned the least Rct at55°C. The · values listed in Table 3, it revealed that theenvironment with higher temperature was helpful to lithium-ions diffusion within electrodes.
The surface morphologies of samples after chargedischarge cycling test are shown in Fig. 9. The change onsurface morphology owing to continuous redox reactions ofASEC-AD film is much less than those of others. Higherresistivity might disturb the migration of electrons and letlithiation-delithiation reaction was only close to surface ofanodes. The ASEC-400 film transformed much more aftercycling test and even appeared a bit powdered. It’s probablyrelated to ASEC-400’s poor electrochemical performance at55°C.
-0.4 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6Potential (V)
-0.00012
-8E-005
-4E-005
0
4E-005
8E-005C
urr
ent
(A)
ASEC-AD
10th cycle20th cycle
(a)
-0.4 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6Potentail (V)
-0.0002
0
0.0002
Cu
rren
t (A
)
ASEC-200
10th cycle20th cycle
(b)
-0.4 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6Potentail (V)
-0.0001
-5E-005
0
5E-005
Cu
rren
t (A
)
ASEC-400
10th cycle20th cycle
(c)
Fig. 7 Comparison of Cyclic voltammograms: (a) ASEC-AD, (b) ASEC-200, (c) ASEC-400.
(a)
0 40 80 120Z' (Ω)
0
40
80
120
-Z"
( Ω)
20th at HT-0.01VASEC-AD
ASEC-200
ASEC-400
(b)
0 400 800 1200 1600Z' (Ω)
0
400
800
1200
1600
-Z"
(Ω)
10th at RT-0.01VASEC-AD
ASEC-200
ASEC-400
Fig. 8 Nyquist plots of specimens at different voltages and temperatures(a) RT (b) HT.
C.-H. Wu, T.-S. Lui, F.-Y. Hung and L.-H. Chen1672
4. Conclusion
IOC of eutectic AlSi/Al dual layered film increased andtheir resistivities decreased obviously without ultra-highannealing temperature. The ASEC-400 film had excellentperformance in cycling test at room temperature but didn’toperate well at higher temperature due to gradual destructionon the microstructure. The ASEC-200 film had higherresistivity and limited the redox reactions at RT but hadhuge volumetric variation at 55°C. Both enhanced drivingforce and appropriate resistivity had contributed to improveand stable the performance of eutectic AlSi/Al thin filmanode materials.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to National Cheng KungUniversity, the Center for Micro/Nano Science and Tech-nology (NCKU Project of Promoting Academic Excellence& Developing World Class Research Center: D101-2700)and the Chinese National Science Council for its financialsupport (NSC 100-2221-E-006-094; NSC 100-2622-E-006-030-CC3).
REFERENCES
1) W. Pu, X. He, J. Ren, C. Wan and C. Jiang: Electrochim. Acta 50(2005) 41404145.
2) N. Tamura, R. Ohshita, M. Fujimoto, S. Fujitani, M. Kamino and I.Yonezu: J. Power Sources 107 (2002) 4855.
3) K. D. Kepler, J. T. Vaughey and M. M. Thackeray: J. Power Sources8182 (1999) 383387.
4) G. X. Wang, L. Sun, D. H. Bradhurst, S. X. Dou and H. K. Liu:J. Alloy. Compd. 299 (2000) L12L15.
5) J. Chouvin, J. Olivier-Fourcade, J. C. Jumas, B. Simon and O.Godiveau: Chem. Phys. Lett. 308 (1999) 413420.
6) L. M. L. Fransson, J. T. Vaughey, R. Benedek, K. Edstrom, J. O.Thomas and M. M. Thackeray: Electrochem. Commun. 3 (2001) 317323.
7) H. Sakaguchi, H. Honda, Y. Akasaka and T. Esaka: J. Power Sources119121 (2003) 5055.
8) M. Inaba, T. Uno and A. Tasaka: J. Power Sources 146 (2005) 473477.
9) Z. Chen, J. Qian, X. Ai, Y. Cao and H. Yang: Electrochim. Acta 54(2009) 41184122.
10) M. J. Lindsay, G. X. Wang and H. K. Liu: J. Power Sources 119121(2003) 8487.
11) R. Z. Hu, L. Zhang, X. Liu, M. Q. Zeng and M. Zhu: Electrochem.Commun. 10 (2008) 11091112.
12) S. Chen, F. Ke, M. Zhou and Y. Bai: Acta Mater. 55 (2007) 31693175.13) H. Guo, H. Zhao, C. Yin and W. Qiu: Mater. Sci. Eng. B 131 (2006)
173176.14) H. Ahn, Y. Kim, W. Kim, Y. Sung and T. Seong: J. Power Sources 163
(2006) 211214.15) L. B. Chen, J. Y. Xie, H. C. Yu and T. H. Wang: Electrochim. Acta 53
(2008) 81498153.16) C. Y. Yang, B. C. Wang and J. D. Wu: J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 6
(1995) 249257.17) C. H. Wu, F. Y. Hung, T. S. Lui and L. H. Chen: Mater. Trans. 50
(2009) 381387.18) M. J. Lindsay, G. X. Wang and H. K. Liu: J. Power Sources 119121
(2003) 8487.19) Z. Wang, G. Chen, J. Xu, Z. S. Lv and W. Q. Yang: J. Phys. Chem.
Solids 72 (2011) 773778.20) H. Usui, Y. Yamamoto, K. Yoshiyama, T. Itoh and H. Sakaguchi:
J. Power Sources 196 (2011) 39113915.
ASEC-AD
ASEC-400
ASEC-200
Fig. 9 Surface observations of specimens after cycling testing.
Table 3 Fitted data from Nyquist plots in Fig. 8.
T Rsei (³) Rct (³) · (³Hz1/2)
ASEC-ADRT 165 1200 250
HT 42 500 55
ASEC-200RT 437 600 254
HT 19 8 46
ASEC-400RT 680 830 151
HT 30 37 41
Effects of Vacuum Annealing on the ChargeDischarge Characteristics of Eutectic AlSi/Al Thin Film 1673