11
Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University PEGGY C. KIRBY – University of New Orleans SAM STRINGFIELD – Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory

Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University PEGGY C. KIRBY – University

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University PEGGY C. KIRBY – University

Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences

in the Classroom

CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University

PEGGY C. KIRBY – University of New Orleans

SAM STRINGFIELD – Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory

Page 2: Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University PEGGY C. KIRBY – University

Rosenshine’s 14 Indicatorsof an Effective School

Time on task Daily review Presentation of new content Initial student practice Independent practice Weekly/monthly review Teacher expectations

Positive reinforcement Student progress evaluation Lesson plans Number of interruptions Discipline Ambience Physical characteristics of

the room

Page 3: Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University PEGGY C. KIRBY – University

Necessary Instructional Functionsof an Effective Teacher

Review of previous learning Proper presentation of new material Guided group practice Appropriate feedback and correctives Guided independent practice Periodic review

Page 4: Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University PEGGY C. KIRBY – University

Outlier Approach Uses a mathematical model to predict school-

level student achievement Based on factors such as socioeconomic status School is effective if actual achievement is

higher than expected achievement. School is ineffective if actual achievement is

lower than expected achievement.

Page 5: Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University PEGGY C. KIRBY – University

Sample Pool Consisted of 13 school systems Obtained 3rd grade scores of state basic skills

test in reading Mean scores reported over 2 years Regression models were developed based on

various factors

Page 6: Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University PEGGY C. KIRBY – University

Observations Teachers were rated by 2 observers Four different ratings: effective, weak,

ineffective, and not observed Not observable ratings were eliminated

Page 7: Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University PEGGY C. KIRBY – University

Procedure Each school was visited 3 days in the fall and 3

days in the spring Each observer visited 3rd grade classrooms at

least once a day 116 separate classes were visited Notes were recorded one minute after class

began

Page 8: Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University PEGGY C. KIRBY – University

Results of an Effective School Strong leadership Leadership was knowledgeable of innovation in

classrooms Exposure to new and creative ideas Effective use of time Academic bulletin board themes

Page 9: Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University PEGGY C. KIRBY – University

Results of an Ineffective School Strong leadership, but was never seen in

classrooms Lack of time spent on academics Little planning time for instruction Teachers spent too much time in lounge Poor appearance of teachers Nonacademic bulletin board themes

Page 10: Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University PEGGY C. KIRBY – University

What makes theeffective school different?

The principal insisted on a clear, present academic focus.

Teachers were interested in how well their students mastered basic skills.

There was a prominent display of symbols of academic excellence.

School emphasized interactive teaching in the classrooms.

Page 11: Effective versus Ineffective Schools: Observable Differences in the Classroom CHARLES TEDDLIE – Louisiana State University PEGGY C. KIRBY – University

Conclusion

Teachers in more effective schools consistently displayed more of the

effective teaching behaviors than do teachers in less effective schools.