EFFECT OF CERAMIC WASTE POWDER IN SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE ... · PDF fileEFFECT OF CERAMIC WASTE POWDER IN SELF COMPACTING ... Fineness of CWP is same like cement used in this experiment

June 2016, Volume 3, Issue 6 JETIR (ISSN-2349-5162)

JETIR1606011 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 50

EFFECT OF CERAMIC WASTE POWDER IN

SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE PROPERTIES

Pratik D. Viramgama 1, Prof. S.R. Vaniya

2, Prof Dr. K.B. Parikh

3

1PG student, Master of Structural Engineering, DIET- Rajkot, Gujarat, India

2Assistant Professor, Civil Department, DIET-Rajkot, Gujarat, India.

3Head of Department, Applied Mechanics Department, Government Engg. College, Dahod, Gujarat, India

ABSTRACT: In ceramic industry about 5-10% production goes as waste in various processes while manufacturing. (This

waste percentage goes down if the technology is installed in the new units.) This waste of Ceramic Industries dumped at

nearby places resulting in environmental pollution causing effect to habitant and agricultural lands. Therefore using of

ceramic waste powder in concrete would benefit in many ways in saving energy & protecting the environment. The cost of

deposition of ceramic waste in landfills will be saved. An attempt has been made to study the behavior of SCC with ceramic

waste powder and understands the effect of the mineral admixtures on fresh & hardened properties of SCC and also

investigates the compatibility of ceramic waste powders in SCC along with chemical admixture such as super plasticizers.

Industrial waste ceramic waste powder would be used in self-compacting concrete. Primary aim of this study is to substitute

the cement with ceramic waste powder by 0%,5%,10%,15%,20%,25%,30% and Fly ash 25% by the binder contain of self-

compacting concrete for M-30 and M-35 Grade Concrete. For best result the percentage of ceramic waste powder will be

decided for fresh and harden property of self-compacting concrete. The project can lead to the use of ceramic waste powder in

Self compacting concrete, thus saving landfill and reduce CO2 emission by the use of less cement.

Key words: Fly ash (FA), Fresh and Harden property, Durability, Ceramic Waste Powder (CP).

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 INTRODUCTION

For all types of industrial and civil engineering buildings the cement concrete has been the best building material. Every years

waste material deposited in huge quantity on valuable land. This problem of utilization waste material can be solved up to

certain level if people start use of it. Here, they had studied about use of waste Silica Sand as partial replacement of fine

aggregate in self-compacting concrete. There is decrease in the strength of concrete due to lack of trained construction labor,

increase in the complexity of construction, uncongested design of reinforcement etc. Permeability of concrete is highly

influenced by the lack of consolidation therefore decrease in the durability of concrete structures resulting large number of air

voids affecting the performance. The invention of Self-compacting concrete (SCC) is considered as the most significant

development in the construction industry due to its numerous benefits.

1.2 OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the fresh properties of M-30 & M-35 (Passing ability, Filling ability and Segregation resistance) of SCC

with use of Ceramic Waste Powder 0% ,10% ,15% ,20%,25%,30% and Fly Ash 25% replaced by binder material.

To evaluate the harden properties of M-30 & M-35 (Compressive strength ,Split tensile Strength and Flexural test) of

SCC with use of Ceramic Waste Powder 0% ,10% ,15% ,20%,25%,30% and Fly Ash 25% replaced by binder material.

To evaluate the durability of M-30 & M-35 Acid attack with MgSo4 and HCL solution of SCC with use of Ceramic

Waste Powder 0% ,10% ,15% ,20%,25%,30% and Fly Ash 25% replaced by binder material.

Partially replacement of Cement with Ceramic Waste Powder by weight in Self-Compacting Concrete.

1.3 MATERIALS

A. CEMENT

IS 12269, 1987 conforming of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) of Sanghi 53 grade cement was used.

B. FINE AGGREGATE AND COARSE AGGREGATE

Fine Aggregate used for study as conforming to zone I of IS: 383, 1987.Fine aggregate size less than 4.75mm.

Coarse aggregate size is maximum 20mm used for study as conforming to IS: 383, 1970.

FINE AGGREGATES COARSE AGGREGATES

Specific gravity 2.56 2.77

Water absorption 1.0% 0.40%

Moisture content Nil Nil

C. WATER

Casting and curing in potable water available in the college was used.

D. FLY ASH Class F fly ash which satisfies ASTM C618 & 92a, 1994, obtained from Gandhinagar thermal power station was used for



Production of SCC.

E. SUPER PLASTICIZER The important admixtures are the SP, used with a water reduction greater than 20%. Admixture conforming to IS 9103.

Admixture is most important constitute of SCC to achieving flow ability and passing ability. In this experimental study,

Glenium sky 8784 is used. This admixture of older name is Glenium sky 784.

F. CERAMIC WASTE POWDER

Ceramic waste powder is directly obtained from ceramic wall tiles industries, while finishing process of tiles (sizing). The

Fineness of CWP is same like cement used in this experiment. CWP used in this experiment is obtained from WALLSTONE

CERAMIC PVT LTD, Morbi. CWP is ready to use waste in place of cement, therefore it can be a cost effective factor.

Specific gravity of ceramic waste powder is 2.76.

Chemical Test Result of Ceramic Waste Powder

Sr. No. Test Name Test Result

1 CaO 5.82%

2 SiO2 59.50%

3 Fe2O3 1.12%

4 Al2O3 29.52%

5 MgO 0.26%

6 SO3 0.18%

7 Loss on Ignition 0.90%

1.3 Mix Design of M-30 Grade Concrete

Sr.

No. Type of Mix

W/P

ratio

Total

Binder

(kg/ )

Cement

(kg/ )

Fly

ash

(kg/ )

Ceramic

powder

(kg/ )

Coarse

aggregate

(kg/ )

Fine

aggregate

(kg/ )

Water

(litre/ )

S.P

(1%)

(kg/ )

VMA

(0.25%)

(kg/ )

1 MIX-1

(0% CP+ 25% FA) 0.36 500 375 125 0 741.69 955.12 180 5 1.25

2 MIX-2

(5% CP+ 25% FA) 0.36 500 350 125 25 741.69 955.12 180 5 1.25

3 MIX-3

(10% CP+ 25% FA) 0.36 500 325 125 50 741.69 955.12 180 5 1.25

4 MIX-4

(15% CP+ 25% FA) 0.36 500 300 125 75 741.69 955.12 180 5 1.25

5 MIX-5

(20% CP+ 25% FA) 0.36 500 275 125 100 741.69 955.12 180 5 1.25

6 MIX-6

(25% CP+ 25% FA) 0.36 500 250 125 125 741.69 955.12 180 5 1.25

7 MIX-7

(30% CP+ 25% FA) 0.36 500 225 125 150 741.69 955.12 180 5 1.25

1.4 Mix Design of M-35 Grade Concrete

Sr.

No. Type of Mix

W/P

ratio

Total

Binder

(kg/ )

Cement

(kg/ )

Fly

ash

(kg/ )

Ceramic

powder

(kg/ )

Coarse

aggregate

(kg/ )

Fine

aggregate

(kg/ )

Water

(litre/ )

S.P

(1.2%)

(kg/ )

VMA

(0.25%)

(kg/ )

1 MIX-1

(0% CP+ 25% FA) 0.35 540 405 135 0 741.69 955.12 191.4 6.48 1.35

2 MIX-2

(5% CP+ 25% FA) 0.35 540 378 135 27 741.69 955.12 191.4 6.48 1.35

3 MIX-3

(10% CP+ 25% FA) 0.35 540 351 135 54 741.69 955.12 191.4 6.48 1.35

4 MIX-4

(15% CP+ 25% FA) 0.35 540 324 135 81 741.69 955.12 191.4 6.48 1.35

5 MIX-5

(20% CP+ 25% FA) 0.35 540 297 135 108 741.69 955.12 191.4 6.48 1.35

6 MIX-6

(25% CP+ 25% FA) 0.35 540 270 135 135 741.69 955.12 191.4 6.48 1.35



7 MIX-7

(30% CP+ 25% FA) 0.35 540 243 135 162 741.69 955.12 191.4 6.48 1.35

1.5 RESULTS OF FRESH PROPERTIES OF M30 & M35 GRADE CONCRETE

A. Fresh Properties of M-30 & M-35 Grade Concrete

Sr.

No. Type of Mix

M-30 M-35

Slump

(mm) V-Funnel

(sec) L- Box

(h2/h1) J-Ring

(mm) Slump

(mm) V-Funnel

(sec) L- Box

(h2/h1) J-Ring

(mm)

650-800

mm 8-12 sec. 0.8-1

0 to

10mm 650-800

mm 8-12 sec. 0.8-1

0 to

10mm

1 M-30

(0% CP + 25% FA) 655 10.8 0.82 9.5 690 11.2 0.86 9.1

2 M-30

(5%CP + 25% FA) 665 10.5 0.84 9.3 710 10.5 0.88 8.9

3 M-30

(10%CP + 25% FA) 675 9.6 0.86 9.1 725 9.2 0.89 8.7

4 M-30

(15%CP + 25% FA) 685 9.1 0.89 8.8 730 8.8 0.91 8.4

5 M-30

(20%CP + 25% FA) 690 8.8 0.91 8.5 735 8.7 0.92 8.1

6 M-30

(25%CP + 25% FA) 705 8.4 0.93 8.3 745 8.1 0.94 7.8

7 M-30

(30%CP+25%FA) 710 8.2 0.94 8.1 750 7.9 0.96 7.7

Fig. 1.5(a) SLUMP TEST Fig. 1.5(b) V-FUNNEL TEST



Fig. 1.5(c) L-BOX TEST Fig. 1.5(d) J-RING TEST

1.6 RESULTS OF HARDENED PROPERTIES OF M30 & M35 GRADE CONCRETE

A. Compressive Strength of M-30 & M-35 Grade Concrete

Compressive Strength of cubes in MPa

Sr.No. Type Of Mixes M-30 M-35

7 days 14 days 28 days 7 days 14 days 28 days

1 Mix-1(0%CP+25%FA) 28.89 35.78 43.78 31.56 39.56 48.89

2 Mix-2(5%CP+25%FA) 27.56 34.00 42.00 30.67 38.22 47.78

3 Mix-3(10%CP+25%FA) 25.78 31.11 38.67 29.78 36.67 45.33

4 Mix-4(15%CP+25%FA) 23.33 28.44 36.89 28.22 34.22 43.11

5 Mix-5(20%CP+25%FA) 22.89 27.56 34.67 25.56 32.44 40.67

6 Mix-6(25%CP+25%FA) 20.44 25.33 32.00 24.44 31.78 38.89

7 Mix-7(30%CP+25%FA) 19.33 24.22 31.56 22.89 30.22 37.56

Fig. 1.6(a) Compressive Strength (M-30) Fig. 1.6(b) Compressive Strength (M-35)

B. Flexural Strength of M-30 & M-35 Grade Concrete

Flexural Strength of beam in MPa



1 Mix-1(0%CP+25%FA) 2.80 3.45 4.26 3.19 3.95 4.87

2 Mix-2(5%CP+25%FA) 2.68 3.27 4.05 2.97 3.62 4.66

3 Mix-3(10%CP+25%FA) 2.34 2.91 3.75 2.74 3.47 4.41

4 Mix-4(15%CP+25%FA) 2.20 2.72 3.46 2.63 3.26 3.98

5 Mix-5(20%CP+25%FA) 1.91 2.48 3.18 2.52 2.95 3.70



6 Mix-6(25%CP+25%FA) 1.76 2.27 2.93 2.34 2.77 3.42

7 Mix-7(30%CP+25%FA) 1.54 2.13 2.38 2.15 2.43 3.25

Fig. 1.6(c) Flexural Strength (M-30) Fig. 1.6(d) Flexural Strength (M-35)

C. Split Tensile Strength of M-30 & M-35 Grade Concrete

Split Tensile Strength of Cylinder in MPa



1 Mix-1(0%CP+25%FA) 2.53 3.01 3.85 2.88 3.54 4.32

2 Mix-2(5%CP+25%FA) 2.27 2.78 3.58 2.67 3.15 3.95

3 Mix-3(10%CP+25%FA) 2.03 2.56 3.26 2.39 2.91 3.72

4 Mix-4(15%CP+25%FA) 1.86 2.35 3.06 1.96 2.30 2.97

5 Mix-5(20%CP+25%FA) 1.53 1.98 2.78 1.82 2.28 2.72

6 Mix-6(25%CP+25%FA) 1.31 1.58 2.59 1.64 2.05 2.53

7 Mix-7(30%CP+25%FA) 1.16 1.29 2.23 1.28 1.75 2.30

Fig. 1.6(e) Split Tensile Strength (M-30) Fig. 1.6(f) Split Tensile Strength (M-35)



1.7 DURABILITY TEST RESULTS

A. Average Loss of Comp. Strength of M-30 Grade Concrete Due to Acid & Base Attack Test

Average loss of Comp. Strength (%) For M-30 Grade Concrete

Sr.No. Type Of Mixes ACID ATTACK(HCl) SULPHATE ATTACK(MgS )


1 Mix-1(0%CP+25%FA) 2.15 5.63 13.37 2.34 6.1 14.41

2 Mix-2(5%CP+25%FA) 1.98 4.37 12.35 2.1 5.9 13.57

3 Mix-3(10%CP+25%FA) 2.73 5.9 14.73 2.71 6.72 15.56

4 Mix-4(15%CP+25%FA) 3.01 5.43 15.23 3.21 5.95 16.83

5 Mix-5(20%CP+25%FA) 2.56 5.86 14.19 3.47 7.57 15.91

6 Mix-6(25%CP+25%FA) 3.15 6.71 15.86 3.56 6.43 17.15

7 Mix-7(30%CP+25%FA) 2.97 7.26 16.61 2.77 7.33 16.65

B. Average Loss of Comp. Strength of M-35 Grade Concrete Due to Acid & Base Attack Test

Average loss of Comp. Strength (%) For M-35 Grade Concrete

Sr.No. Type Of Mixes ACID ATTACK(HCl) SULPHATE ATTACK(MgS )


1 Mix-1(0%CP+25%FA) 2.69 5.86 15.17 2.27 6.83 15.24

2 Mix-2(5%CP+25%FA) 1.87 5.31 13.68 1.86 6.32 12.96

3 Mix-3(10%CP+25%FA) 2.32 6.84 14.47 2.51 7.18 14.62

4 Mix-4(15%CP+25%FA) 3.27 5.48 16.82 3.21 6.55 13.66

5 Mix-5(20%CP+25%FA) 2.95 6.22 16.13 3.05 6.84 17.43

6 Mix-6(25%CP+25%FA) 3.18 6.77 15.9 2.91 7.31 16.16

7 Mix-7(30%CP+25%FA) 3.43 7.14 17.77 3.58 7.69 18.57

Fig. 1.7(a) AVERAGE LOSS IN % VARIATION FOR 7-

DAYS

Fig. 1.7(b) AVERAGE LOSS IN % VARIATION

FOR 28-DAYS



Fig. 1.7(c) AVERAGE LOSS IN % VARIATION FOR 91-DAYS

1.8 CONCLUSION

Various tests were carried out on different mixes of concrete containing ceramic powder and fly ash along with control

mixes in self compacting concrete.

Based on experimental investigation, following observations are made on the fresh property, hardened properties and

durability of SCC :

The Use of Ceramic powder and fly ash by substitution to binder has no negative effect on Fresh Properties of SCC.

In Slump flow test, the result shows that by replacing the ceramic powder to 10% by binder contain there will be

increase in the slump flow by 3.05% in M-30 and 5.07 % in M-35 Grade of Concrete.

In V-Funnel Test, the result shows that by replacing the ceramic powder to 10% by binder contain there will be decrease

in the time of V-Funnel test by 11.11% in M-30 and 17.85% in M-35 Grade of Concrete.

In L-Box test, the result shows that by replacing the ceramic powder to 10% by binder contain there will be increase in

the ratio (H2/H1) of L-box test by 4.88% in M-30 and 3.49 % in M-35 Grade of Concrete.

In J-Ring Test, the result shows that by replacing the ceramic powder to 10% by binder contain there will be decrease in

the height of concrete of J-Ring test by 4.21% in M-30 and 4.4% in M-35 Grade of Concrete.

In Hardened property such as Compressive strength, Flexural strength and Split tensile, there is decrease in the strength

of SCC with increase in the percentage of ceramic waste powder.

In Hardened property such as Compressive strength, Flexural strength and Split tensile strength would be put together,

Ceramic powder can apply up to 10% and Fly ash 25% to achieve target mean strength of concrete.

In Durability test using HCL Solution and MgSO4 Solution in M-30 and M-35 grade of concrete, Results for 7 Days, 28

Days and 91 Days shows that there is minimum average loss of compressive strength in percentage of decreasing at Mix

2(5% Ceramic powder and 25% fly ash) in self-compacting concrete. Than significantly increase in the average loss of

compressive strength percentage at 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% ceramic powder and 25% fly ash.

1.9 REFERENCES

[1] A.S.E. Belaidi, L Azzous, E. Kadri, S. Kenai, “Effect of natural pozzolana and marble powder on the property of the

self-compacting concrete” Construction building material, January 2011.

[2] Bouziani Tayeb Benmounah Abdelbaki, Bederina madani and lamara Mohamed, “Effect on marble powder on the

properties of self-compacting sand concrete”, Construction and building technology journal, 2011, 5, 25-29.

[3] B.H.V. Pai, M. Nandy , A. Krishnamoorthy, P.K Sarkar, Philip George, “Comparative study of self-compacting concrete

mixes containing fly ash and rice husk ash”, American journal of engineering research (AJER)”, 2014

[4] Dhiyaneshwaran, Ramanathan, Baskar and Venkatasubramani, “Study on durability of self-compacting concrete with

fly ash”, Jordan journal of civil engineering, 2013



[5] EFNARC. 2002. Specification and guidelines for self-compacting concrete. European Federation of Producers and

Applicators of Specialist Products for Structures.

[6] Ilker Bekir Topçu, Turhan Billir Tayfun Uygunoglu, “Effect of waste marble dust content as filler on properties of self-

compacting concrete” Construction and building material, September 2008.

[7] Bernardinus Herbudiman, Adhi Mulyawan Saptaji (Elsevier-2013) “Self-Compacting Concrete with Recycled

Traditional Roof Tile Powder”

[8] Khalid Najim, Ibrahim Al-Jumaily, Abdukhaliq Atea, (Elsevier, November-2015) “Characterization of Sustainable High

Performance/Self-Compacting Concrete Produced Using CKD as a Cement Replacement Material”

[9] Muhd Fadhil Nuruddin, Kok Yung Chang, Norzaireen Mohd Azmee (Elsevier, December- 2014) “Workability and

Compressive Strength of Ductile Self Compacting Concrete (DSCC) With Various Cement Replacement Materials”

[10] Chaijun Shi, Zemei Wu, KuiXi Lv, Linmei Wu (Elsevier, March-2015)”A Review on Mixture Design Method for

Self Compacting Concrete”

[11] IS: 456-2000 Plain and reinforced Concrete-Code of Practice, Fourth Revision, and July-2010, BIS, New Delhi.

[12] IS: 10262-1982 Recommended Guidelines for Concrete Mix Design, Fifth Reprint, and March-1998, BIS, New Delhi

[13] IS: 10262-2009, “Concrete Mix Proportioning Guidelines”, First Revision, July-2009, BIS, New Delhi

[14] Okamura H, Ozawa K. 1994. Self-compactable high performance concrete in Japan. In International Workshop on High-

performance Concrete. 1-16.

[15] Okamura H, Ouchi M. 2003b. Self-compacting concrete. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology 1(1):5-15.

[16] Okamura H, Ozawa K. 1995. Mix design for self-compacting concrete. Concrete Library of Japanese Society of Civil

Engineers 25(6):107-120.

[17] Okamura H. 1997. Self-compacting high-performance concrete. Concrete International 19(7):50-54.

[18] Okamura H, Maekawa K, Ozawa K. 1993. High performance concrete. Giho-do Press, Tokyo.

[19] Okamura H, Ouchi M. 1999. Self-compacting concrete development, present use and future. In: The 1st International

RILEM Symposium on Self.

[20] Okamura H, Ouchi M. 2003a. Applications of self-compacting concrete in Japan. In: The 3rd International RILEM

Symposium on Self-Compacting Concrete. Wallevik OH, Nielsson I, editors, RILEM Publications S.A.R.L., Bagneux,

France. 3-5.

[21] Krishna Murthy, Narasimha Rao A V, Ramma Reddy I Vand, Vijay Sekhar Reddy M “Mix design procedure for self-

compacting concrete” IOSR Journals of Engineering 2(9), 2012, 33-41.

[22] Liana Iures and Cornelu Bob, “The future concrete: Self-compacting concrete”, 2010

[23] M. S. Shetty,” Concrete Technology” (Theory and Practice), S.Chand & Company Limited, New Delhi, Seventh Edition,

July-2012.

[24] A M Neville, “ Properties of Concrete”, Pearson Education, Published in India By Dorling Kindersley India Private

Limited, Fourth Edition, 2007

Documents

EFFECT OF CERAMIC WASTE POWDER IN SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE ... · PDF fileEFFECT OF CERAMIC WASTE POWDER IN SELF COMPACTING ... Fineness of CWP is same like cement used in this experiment