Upload
vothu
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EEA State of the Environment Report 2010: Europe in transition towards a sustainable 2050?
Hans Eerens,TFIAM- Bilthoven -10 June 2009
Contributors:Contributors:Contributors:Contributors:
EEA: Stephane Isoard, Anke Lükewille, Martin Adams, Andre Jol, Andreas Barkman. Aphrodite Morelatoe
PBL: Hans Eerens, Paul Ruyssenaars, Jelle van Minnen, Guus Velders, Jos Olivier, Jean-Paul Hettelingh, Joost-jan Schrander, Frank de Leeuw
UBA-Dessau : Benno Hain, Thomas Voigt, Martin Cassel-Gintz, Inke Schauser
UBA-Vienna: Sabine Göttlicher, Andrea Prutsch, Sabine McCallum, Bernd Gugele
NILU : Kevin Barrett
Auth : Nicolas Moussiopoulos, Zissis Samaras, Fotios
Barmpas, Leonidas Ntziachristos, Liana Kalognomou
AEA-T : Mike Harley
REC: Maria Khovanskaia
JRC-Ispra: Frank Dentener, Rita van Dingen
Contents SOEOR 2010
Systems Themes
Atmosphere Atmospheric pollution
Climate change
Aquatic Fresh water
Marine
Terrestrial Land / Soil
Biodiversity
Human Human lifestylesInnovation
Climat
ech
ange
Susta
inable
cons
umpt
ion
Susta
inable
prod
uctio
n
Enviro
nmen
t and
hea
lth
Biodive
rsity
and
ecos
yste
ms
Socio-
econ
omic
trend
s
Global
trade
Inte
rnal
mar
ket
Policie
s
Lega
lEco
nom
icTec
hnica
lGov
erna
nce
6th EAP priorities Key drivers Policy Responses
S I P D R
Link to Part A
Link to Part C
Themes matrix
Questions
1. How do we want the environment in 2050 to look like? What are long term objectives for air pollution policy?
2. How much emission reduction is required? 3. What would an ambitious climate policy
contribute to that goal?4. What steps have to be taken?
5. How to incorporate aspirational targets in SOER2010?
Vision 2050: Air quality, climate, energy security
Climate:� Global collaboration for effective green house gas abatement including the
emerging large players� leading to an 80 per cent chance of limiting global warming to 20C, eventually,
on average � Eighty per cent less greenhouse gases emitted from the EU by 2050 –
domestically !
Air Quality:� Deposition on ecosystems at or below sustainable levels� Air Quality improved to levels below WHO recommended values
Energy security:� Mix of technologies in energy production, consumption and land use based on
currently identifiable technologies
� Drastically improved diversity of primary energy sources and origins.
Current developments: Acidifying and particle formation eq emissions
0
500
1 000
1 500
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
kt
Aci
dif
yin
g
Po
ten
tia
l e
q
Ind
ex
19
90
=1
00
EEA-32 + WB Countries - past emissions
EEA-32 + WB Countrie 2020 baseline projections
EEA-32 + WB Countrie 2020 MRR projections
0
10 000
20 000
30 000
40 000
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020k
t P
art
icu
late
Fo
rma
tio
n e
q
Ind
ex
19
90
=1
00
EEA-32 + WB - past emissions (weighted sum of Nox, Sox, NH3)
EEA-32 + WB - past emissions (PM10)
EEA-32 + WB Countries 2020 baseline projections
EEA-32 + WB Countries 2020 MRR projections
GAINS Baseline for NECD plus Climate and Energy Package (-20% GHG, 20 % share of renewables+ JI/CDM at 30 Euro/t CO2+ full renewable trade on top of baseline), February 08. Current control policies. They include: - 'Current legislation' in all sectors – Emission limit values on combustion sources in industry and power sector from the IPPC Directive (less strict interpretation) - Euro VI on heavy-duty vehicles - Ceilings from the NEC Directive., MRR: maximum technical reductions options
preparing
SoER2010,
Copenhagen
22 April
2009, Frank
de Leeuw
p
Air Quality Impacts
Health: � focus on ozone and
PM
� Ecosystems:� eutrophication &
acidification� ozone (CSI05)
preparing
SoER2010,
Copenhagen
22 April
2009, Frank
de Leeuw
p
Air Quality - State
� State (regional, urban): � focus on ozone, PM, NOx� increasing hemispheric contributions� Changing composition ?
Rural stations, indexed concentration changes
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
CO
SO2
NO2
PM10
ozone
NOx
OX
Urban stations, indexed concentration changes
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
CO
SO2
NO2
PM10
ozone
NOx
OX
preparing
SoER2010,
Copenhagen
22 April
2009, Frank
de Leeuw
p
Air Quality - State
� Population exposure� Distance to target, discussion
on benefits when meeting PM2.5 targets/limits
� source apportionment(traffic,……)
0
10
20
30
40
50
BG
R
HU
N
POL
CZ
E
RO
U
SVK
NL
D
CY
P
GR
C
BE
L
ML
T
PRT
ITA
LT
U
FIN
ESP
DN
K
LV
A
GB
R
AU
T
DE
U
FRA
EST
LU
X
SWE
SVN
NO
R
LIE
ISL
IRL
perc
enta
ge
LV compliance AEI reduction target
preparing
SoER2010,
Copenhagen
22 April
2009, Frank
de Leeuw
p
Air Quality Outlook
� N Hemispheric long term: 2050 (-2100)using global SRM (from JRC) impact of 4 source regions (EU, US, India China) on NH ozone concentrations; estimate health impacts on population in large cities. Additional input global outlooks (GEO4, OECD) & from co-benefit studies
� Europe: medium term: 2020-2030material from CAFE, NEC (CIAM); discussion on state (O3, PM), impacts, benefits (physical or monetary endpoints?)
preparing
SoER2010,
Copenhagen
22 April
2009, Frank
de Leeuw
p
Air Quality & Climate Change
� linked by pollutant (O3, PM and their precursors)� linked by sources
Climate change Impact in Europe
4.2.1 General Europe: Temperature
� Europe has warmed more than the global average. The annual average temperature for the European land area up to 2007 was 1.2 °C above pre-industrial levels. Eight of the12 years between 1996 and 2007 were among the 12 warmest years since 1850.
(Trend: well recorded)
� The annual average temperature is projected to rise this century by 1–5.5 °C (best estimate) with the largest warming over eastern and northern Europe in winter, and over south-western and Mediterranean Europe in summer.
(Projections: well established)
4.2.1 General Europe: Precipitation
� Annual precipitation trends in the 20th century showed an increase in northern Europe (10–40 %) and a decrease in some parts of southern Europe (up to 20 %). Mean winter precipitation has increased in most of western and northern Europe (20 to 40 %), whereas southern Europe and parts of central Europe were characterized by drier winters.(Trend: well recorded)
� Models project an increase in winter precipitation in northern Europe, whereas many parts of Europe may experience dryer summers. But there are uncertainties in the magnitude and geographical details of the changes.
(Projections: well established)
4.2.3 Northern Europe (boreal region)Forest growth
� In much of continental Europe, the majority of forests are now growing faster than in the early 20th century. Periods of drought and warm winters are increasing pest populations and weakening forests.(Several drivers)
� A changing climate will favour certain species in some forest locations, while making conditions worse for others, leading to substantial shifts in vegetation distribution. The distribution and phenology of other plant and animal species (both pests and pollinators) are likely to change, leading to further alterations in competitive dynamics in forests that will be difficult to predict.(Simulation with A1B; period 2070-2100)
4.2.3 Northern Europe (boreal region)Crop yield variability
� Climate and its variability are largely responsible for variations in crop suitability and productivity in Europe. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the variability of crop yields has increased as a consequence of extreme climatic events, e.g. the summer heat of 2003 and the spring drought of 2007.(Difficult to separate climate effects)
� As a consequence of climatic change, such events are projected to increase in frequency and magnitude, and crop yields to become more variable. Changes in farming practices and land management can act as risk-mitigating measures.(+2°C-positive; +4°C-adverse)
4.2.4 Central- and eastern EuropeForest Stability
� The hot summer of 2003 in Europe is estimated to have led to EUR 10 billion in economic losses to farming, livestock and forestry from the combined effects of drought, heat stress and fire. Climate-related increases in crop yields are expected mainl y in northern Europe (by about 10 %) with reductions (of 10 % or more) in the Mediterranean and the sout h-west Balkans.
� There are likely to be changes in forest growth wit h climate change, and related economic consequences, though projections of future net changes in Europe are uncertain.
4.2.5 Mountain Areas
Distribution of Plant Species
� Climate change, in particular milder winters, is responsible for the observed northward and uphill distribution shifts of many European plant species. Mountain ecosystems in many parts of Europe are changing as pioneer species expand uphill and cold-adapted species are driven out of their ranges.
(Trend: well recorded)
� By the late 21st century, distributions of European plant species are projected to have shifted several hundred kilometres to the north, forests are likely to have contracted in the south and expanded in the north, and 60 % of mountain plant species may face extinction.
(Projections: several runs with severalscenarios)
4.2.7 The Mediterranean RegionHeat-Waves
� Increasing temperatures are likely to increase the number of heat-related deaths. Mortality risk increases by between 0.2 and 5.5 % for every 1 °C increase in temperature above a location-specific threshold. More than 70 000 excess deaths were reported from 12 European countries in the hot summer of 2003 (June to September). Long heat waves (more than 5 days) have an impact 1.5 to 5 times greater than shorter events.(Trend: well recorded ?)
� 86 000 net extra deaths per year are projected for the EU Member States for a high-emissions scenario with a global mean temperature increase of 3 °C in 2071–2100 relative to 1961–1990.(Projection: results from PESETA with regard to + 3°C)
4.2.7 The Mediterranean RegionForest Fire Danger
� In a warmer climate, more severe fire weather is expected and, as a consequence, more area burned, more ignitions and longer fire seasons.
(Trend: Computed on basis of meteorological fire danger indices)
� Climate change will increase the fire potential during summer months, especially in southern and central Europe.(Projection: HIRHAM-model runs for the SRES-A2-Scenario 2071-2100)
22Vision for 2050 - transport
Low carbon and robust European transport systems th at support a dynamic and competitive European economy
� Emissions from the transport sector are reduced by 60-80% in 2050 relative to 2005, including aviation and shipping
� European transport systems are robust (= opposite to vulnerable), efficient and reliable.
23A route towards low carbon transport
Low -carbonvehicles
volume/shift
Roadpassenger
biofuels
efficiency
Aviation
biofuels
efficiency
volume/shift
Roadfreight
biofuels
navigation
100
CO2 emission, index 1990=100
2050
20 Low -carbon
Low -carbonvehicles
Roadpassenger
Biofuels
Efficiency
Aviation
Biofuels
Efficiency
volume/shift
Roadfreight
Biofuels
Efficiency
Inland
100
CO2
1990 2050
230
20 Low -carbon
Factor 12
Factor 20-25
Factor 10
Factor 6
Factor 7-8
volume/shift
24Trade off: reduction potential and uncertainty
0% Emission reduction potential
Emissionreduction potential
High degree of uncertainty(effects, costs, potential)
Low degree of uncertainty50%
25%
Current hybrid vehicles
Plug-in hybrid car
Full electricvehicle
Green logistics
Biomass-to-liquid jet fuels
Current commercial jet biofuels
1st generation biofuels (biodiesel, ethanol)
2st generation biofuels (biodiesel, ethanol)
Land use planning
Fuel cell hydrogen road vehicles
Technical energy efficiency measures shipping (e.g. skysail)
Heavy oil biofuel substitutes for shipping
Coal-to liquied biofuels
3rd generation biofuels (algea etc.)
100%
BtL biofuels with CCS
Speed reductionsshipping, aviation
Technical energy efficiency measures aviation
Fuel cells shipping, aviation
ETS aviationETS maritime transport
EC policy development
priority
Wrong turnNo regretstart soon
R&D
CO2 taxdifferentation
25A new transport agenda - recommendations
� Develop a vision for a low carbon transport sector addressing risks, vulnerability, security and resilience
� Build on what exists� Energy efficiency regulations, provide flexibility between vehicle and
fuel targets (e.g. allowing trade of credits), aviation and maritime transport in effective ETS systems
� Make better use of money � Focus on TEN-T priority networks, proven economic rationale
� Wrong turn � LDV’s and personal cars are not the best application for biofuels,
focus R&D and market aids on advanced biodiesel (ships) and biokerosine.
� Reducing emissions from aviation and shipping is key; requires early action and global policy strategies
� Investing in the electricity grid of 2050
�
� Distinguishing interim solutions from long-term strategies.
� price signals under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme will not be sufficient to trigger the development of new systems as needed by 2050.
� securing energy supply on the basis of coal without CCS is a dead end.
� Therefore, an additional policy framework is necessary to guide investments, demand policy and research.
At a strategic level, a number common challenges between the three themes appear
� Slow changes are key, choices in the next 5 years affect the reality in 2050
� Interim solutions are sometimes a dead time and sometimes a bridge to 2050
� Addressing risks requires a battle against uniformity, diversity is key for all three themes
� Wiggle room to manoeuvre with natural resources will be precious� EU’s leverage on the rest of the world is significant, but time-bound� Consumption and public acceptance are key issues, need to find a right
role for EU� Physical infrastructure and networks requires EU role