Upload
clarence-hamilton
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Educational Philosophies
"Education is what remains when we have forgotten all that we have been taught.”George Savile, Marquis of Halifax (1633-1695)
English statesman and author.
Reggio Emilia Approach Response to WWII (Italy)/more just world-
democratic Began – parent initiative Sought help Loris Malaguzzi (Constructivist
Approach) Birth through six years of age 1968-Preschool; 1970 Infant Toddler 1991-Innovative approach worldwide
(Newsweek Magazine) Principles: respect, responsibility, community
Reggio Emilia PrinciplesChild is the protagonist . . .
Some control over learning Learn through experiences &
exploration (constructivist/ emergent curriculum)
Relationships with others Endless ways to express themselves
Reggio Emilia PhilosophyInvolvement Parents. . .
Volunteering Philosophy in home Expected to participate
School policy Curriculum Planning/Evaluation Child Development Concerns
Reggio Emilia – Role of Teachers
Co-learning, collaborator Skilled Observers Curriculum – interests of children Expand children’s learning – pictures,
videos, notes, conversations Absence of teacher manuals &
achievement tests Children with teacher – 3 years
Reggio Emilia – Long Term Projects
Real life problem solving & creative thinking among peers
Small groups work on projects/based on developmental and socio cultural concerns; others self-select activities
Different from thematic approach High value on improve, flexibility,
children’s interests-enjoy the unexpected!
Reggio Emilia – The Environment
Viewed as 3rd teacher Belief – children create meaning &
make sense of their world (alphabet) Plants, natural light, displays of
projects, photographs, children’s work/discussion comments
Design-set up for interaction, sense of community
Reggio Emilia – Developmentally Appropriate Practice
Some challenges to Western practices Teacher viewed as confused contributor
to learning versus teacher competence Importance of child’s ability to negotiate
is emphasized
Reggio Emilia – 100 Languages of Learning
Travelling exhibition, Loris Malaguzzi Children investigate Generate and test hypotheses Depict understanding through
symbolic languages Drawing, sculpture, dramatic play, &
writing Purposely allow mistakes to happen Trust in children/family to select curriculum worth
knowing about
Reggio Emilia – Video Clip
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UFhcDzAqdk&NR=1 (student clip) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UFhcDzAqdk&feature=related (student
clip)
Emergent Curriculum Loris Malaguzzi (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNFYFSa0720&feature=related)
Maria Montessori History Born Italy Work – Univ. of Rome – Psychiatric
Clinic/Treatment of children Directed school for children with mental
disabilities (considered uneducable-2 years later-passed test)
Motivated study potential of typical children, led to S.F. Pananma-Pacific International Exposition (21 children, 4 months, observation booth)
After WWII – emphasis on peace
Maria Montessori Information Ages 3 – 6 & 6-12+ Class size (30-35) teacher, assistant 3-hour period of uninterrupted, work time
each day Assessment-portfolio
Real test: behavior of children/holistic view Happiness, maturity, kindness, love of learning,
concentration, work
Teachers-extensive Montessori training Prepared environment
Maria Montessori Approach Principles, concepts applied across ages
Independence Observation Following the Child Correcting the Child Prepared Environment Absorbent Mind
Maria Montessori Approach Principles, concepts applied across
ages Independence
Allow children to succeed Offer help only when needed
Maria Montessori Approach Principles, concepts applied across
ages Observation
By teachers Child bangs on objects, need for gross
motor activity such as a drum
Maria Montessori Approach Principles, concepts applied across
ages Following the Child
Child takes lead Help move to next step – stay challenged
Maria Montessori Approach Principles, concepts applied across
ages Correcting the Child
Mistakes are made Calmly help child to decide what to do
Something is dropped-child picks it up
Maria Montessori Approach Principles, concepts applied across ages
Prepared Environment Child sized equipment/tables/chairs Safe for exploration Ready and beautifully inviting Activities set up for success (cutting, writing
name) Freedom of choice (versus rotating children from
table to table) Environment includes the parents
Maria Montessori Approach Principles, concepts applied across ages
Absorbent Mind Not necessary for lessons to learn – mind
absorbs everything Hands-on active exploration Language-cautions teachers to think of
how they talk to children – mutual respect Try not to say word “no” to child, instead
say “stop”
Maria Montessori Curriculum All areas of intelligences & styles of learning
respected & nurtured/aligns with Howard Gardner (Multiple Intelligences) musical, bodily-kinesthetic, spatial,
interpersonal, intrapersonal, intuitive, natural, and the traditional linguistic and logical-mathematical
Maria Montessori CurriculumMaterials organized 5 Curriculum Areas Practical Life Sensorial Language Math Cultural
Maria Montessori Video Clip
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OM1Gu9KXVkk (Time 10:05)
http://www.blog.montessoriforeveryone.com/top-ten-montessori-videos-on-youtube.html (top 10 videos)
Waldorf History Began 1919 Rudolf Steiner, Austrian philosopher,
teacher & developer/founder of Waldorf (died 1925)
Started 1st School Named/Waldoff-Astoria Cigarette
factory/employees Stuggart, Germany
Waldorf History Steiner focused on writings, lectures, private
consultations Fields: art, architecture, science, education, ag,
medicine, economic, religion, care of dying, social organization
Influence today includes Waldorf Strives to transform education – art
Whole child – heart, hands & head Encourages creativity and “free thinking”
Waldorf History 2010/600 Schools worldwide, 125 North America;
2 stated funded in Wisconsin/Michigan Charter Public School in Chico, CA Private School in Sonora, CA Families – “middleclass, avoid TV & shopping
malls, buy organic, recycle and compost; want their children to strive for other things than those just right SAT scores” (www.waldorf critics.org)
Waldorf Approach Students of Waldorf
Emphasis on the humanities/arts such as music, dance, theater
Writing, literature, legends, myths Learn to knit by first grade Read, ingest, and test! Experienced through experiences Cultivates-life-long learning
Cognitive, physical, spiritual To be of service to the world
Waldorf
Steiner/founder/controversy Steiner founded Anthroposophy Philosophy is NOT taught to Waldorf
students Highly complex esoteric (understood by
only by an inner circle) philosophy “Cultivating conscientiously form of
thinking independent of sensory experience.” Wikipedia
Waldorf
Spiritual/many definitions
Highest priority-loving to oneself, others, planet Happiness comes from within (not materialism) Yoga, religion, meditation does not define a person
as spiritual Both religion/spirituality connote belief in a Higher
Power of some kind Both religion/spirituality desire to connect with
Higher Power, rituals practices, daily moral behaviors that foster connection
Waldorf Approach Responds to three developmental phases
of childhood Birth to 7 7 to 14 14 to 18
Steiner suggests: curriculum meaningful and age appropriate
Waldorf Approach Teachers value – inner enthusiasm, think
independently, strive harmony; greet children each morning with a handshake
Same teacher – 8 elementary school years
Similarity to Montessori-both tactile (senses) & developmentally appropriate curriculum (taught to knit by 1st grade)
Waldorf Approach Educate all children Understanding of world cultures &
religions (non-sectarian, non denominational, no particular religious doctrine)
Spiritual dimension Families – broad range religious
traditions and interests
Waldorf Environment
In a time of computers and early learning (teach your baby to read): Emphasis on imagination Void of brightly colored toys and
bulletin boards Walls painted in soothing pastels
Waldorf Readiness for Real World
2010 Waldorf Website - According to a recent study of Waldorf graduates:
94% attended college or university 47% chose humanities or arts as a major 42% chose sciences or math as a major 89% are highly satisfied in choice of occupation 91% are active in lifelong education 92% placed a high value on critical thinking 90% highly values tolerance of other viewpoints
Waldorf Readiness for Real World
Transfer to public school Upgrade reading (start at age 7/Waldorf),
new approach to science (differs Waldorf-observation of natural phenomena; Public-formulation of abstract concepts and laws
Well prepared for social studies, math, humanities
HighScope Began in US – 1960s Common here, other countries Preschool, kindergarten, elementary Based on Jean Piaget’s ideas/active, hands-on
learning, scientists (Swiss psychologist, 1896-1980)
Led by David Weikert Teachers/facilitators or partners Encompasses all aspects of child development Partnership with parents
HighScope David Weikart, Director of special services in the
Ypsilanti, Michigan public school district Known – successful school district Interested in the children failing (low scores,
impoverished neighborhoods) Collaborated
Committee of elementary education leaders that included Perry School's, Charles Eugene Beatty, Michigan's first African-American principal.
Known as the Perry Preschool Project (1962) Hired 4 teacher, Michigan’s 1st preschool, operation Perry
Elementary School
HighScope Classroom Preschool Focus
Cognitively oriented rather than social and emotional advances
Theory for teaching/learning Support child’s talents through active learning Support from families, teachers, administrators
Designated different activities: Water play, reading, sand play, art, writing, dramatic play,
housekeeping, block building
Independence and responsibility
HighScope Plan-Do-Review
Formally or informal First – plan what to do and select
materials Second – carry out plan Third – review plan – discuss what
they did and what was successful
Importance of Study to ECE Field Late 1960s and early 1970s, research examining
effectiveness of preschool-inconclusive. 1969 Head Start program evaluated by
Westinghouse Learning Corporation Findings led policy makers and the public to believe
that Head Start was a failure. Same time period,Urie Bronfenbrenner &
colleagues reviewed existing studies of early childhood program effects Findings only critical feature of effective preschool
programs was that they targeted parents.
Importance of Study to ECE Field To refute findings, Irving Lazar brought together
researchers conducting longitudinal studies, effects of early childhood programs
Formed the Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. Main goal-to refute earlier findings-preschool
effects diminish with time Group's work identified clear long-term effects
for children of diverse program Some studies focus was children, some focus was
parents
HighScope Perry Preschool Project
Well known Study/HighScope research efforts, longitudinal data collection by Weikart and colleagues
123 African Americans born in poverty and at high risk of failing in school
1962–1967, subjects ages 3 and 4 Randomly divided into two groups
Program group: enrolled high-quality preschool program based on HighScope's participatory learning approach
Comparison group who received no preschool program.
Perry Study – Study
Originally not a longitudinal study Effects of each finding, inspired
further data collection Data collecting: ages 10, 14, 19, 27,
39-41
Perry Study – Early Findings Effects Age 10: Despite diminishing effect intellectual performance
Fewer held back a grade Fewer placed in special education (17% enrolled compared 34% not enrolled)
Findings as 14-year-olds, even bigger statistically significant effect significantly higher average achievement scores at age
14 Findings as 19-year-olds
Significantly higher literacy scores
Perry Study – Adult Findings
Effects Age 27: Incidence of crime
7%-35% arrested 5 or more 7&-25%, drug related offenses
Earnings and economic status Earn $2,000 or more a mo. (29%-7%) Owned their own homes (36%-13%) Owned second car (30%-13%) Received welfare assistance/social services at
some time (59%-80%)
Perry Study – Early Findings
Effects Age 27 (continued): Educational attainment
Graduated from high school or GED certificate (71%-54%)
Marriage and single parenthood Married (40%-8%) Women single parents (57%-83%)
Perry Study – Adults at age 40 More recent phase (2005), 97% participants still
living,interviewed at age 40. Other data gathered from school, social services, and
arrest records. Findings: age 39-41, group attended preschool
compared to control group (did not attend preschool) higher earnings more likely to hold a job committed fewer crimes more likely to have graduated from high school
Conclusion Three strengths
Design involved random assignment of poor children either to a preschool program group or a no-preschool program group. Exception siblings – assigned to same group.
Research perspective: longitudinal follow-ups through age 27 had very little missing data — an average of only 5% per measure
Pattern of findings/internally consistent Polictically
Head Start supported/Federal Government State Preschools
Hope-lasting contribution to society