Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. 905-272-3600
May 7, 2019 [email protected]
Education Development Charges
Background Study
Peel District School Board
OFFICE CONSOLIDATION INCORPORATING
ADDENDUM OF MAY 7th, 2019
________________________
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019
Table of Contents
Page
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... i
1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-1
1.1 Background ............................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Existing By-Laws .................................................................................... 1-2
1.3 Area in Which By-law May Apply ............................................................ 1-3
1.4 EDC Review Areas ................................................................................. 1-4
2. The EDC By-law ............................................................................................... 2-1
2.1 Imposition of an EDC .............................................................................. 2-1
2.2 The Background Study ........................................................................... 2-2
2.3 Public Meetings ...................................................................................... 2-3
2.4 Exemptions, Expiration, Collection ......................................................... 2-6
2.5 Appeals and Amendments ...................................................................... 2-8
3. The Process and Methodology of Calculating an Education Development Charge ....................................................................................... 3-1
3.1 Eligibility .................................................................................................. 3-1
3.2 Demographic Projections ........................................................................ 3-5
3.3 Site Needs .............................................................................................. 3-7
3.4 Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs ............................................ 3-8
3.5 Determination of the Charge ................................................................... 3-9
4. Demographic Projections ............................................................................... 4-1
4.1 The Residential Growth Forecast ........................................................... 4-1
4.2 Enrolment Projections ............................................................................. 4-5
4.3 Summary of Projected Enrolment ......................................................... 4-18
5. Education Development Charge Calculation ................................................ 5-1
5.1 The Projections ....................................................................................... 5-1
Table of Contents (Cont’d)
Page
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019
5.2 Net Education Land Costs ...................................................................... 5-4
5.3 Reconciliation of the EDC Reserve Fund ................................................ 5-8
5.4 The Education Development Charge .................................................... 5-10
Appendix A Education Development Charges Ministry of Education Forms Submission .......................................................................................................A1
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019
Foreword and Acknowledgements
Section 257.61(1) of the Education Act states that, “Before passing an education
development charge by-law, the board shall complete an education development
charge background study.” Section 257.61(2) of the Act, as well as Section 9 of Ontario
Regulation 20/98, as amended, provide the information that must be contained in the
background study. This report contains the background study for the Peel District
School Board (PDSB).
The amended version of the EDC Background Study incorporates an addendum to the
original study. The revisions to the study occurred as part of the stakeholder and public
feedback process and have resulted in some changes to the original proposed EDC
rate.
The first change reflects moving an elementary school to its correct EDC review area.
This change had no impact on the EDC rate or any of the assumptions used to calculate
the rate. The second change reflects an elementary site requirement in the City of
Mississauga. The Board requires a total of two sites in review area ERA04B, however
one of the two sites is already owned and was incorrectly identified as needing to be
purchased. As such, any associated purchase expenditures have been removed
resulting in the proposed residential EDC rate decreasing to $3,476 from $3,734 and
the proposed non-residential EDC rate decreasing to $0.46 from $0.50 per square foot.
The consultant would like to acknowledge and thank the staff at the PDSB for their
work, time and effort over the past several months. Staff from the Board provided
invaluable input and assistance throughout the EDC process.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019
The consultant would also like to thank Keel Cottrelle LLP, legal counsel for the Board,
and Cushman & Wakefield, the appraisal firm responsible for the site valuations.
Executive Summary
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE i
Executive Summary
Education development charges (EDCs) are a revenue source, for school boards that
qualify, to purchase and develop land for new schools. EDCs are meant as a funding
mechanism for boards that are experiencing a growth-related accommodation need in
their jurisdiction. In order to enact their by-law, the Board must follow certain processes
and guidelines as required by provincial legislation. This background study fulfills certain
requirements while providing the background necessary to understand and determine
the education development charge.
The general authority for school boards to impose EDCs is provided by Division E of
Part IX of the Education Act. Ontario Regulation 20/98, as amended, provides the
requirements necessary to determine an EDC. In addition, the Ministry has published a
set of EDC Guidelines to assist boards with the EDC process.
The jurisdiction of the Board consists of the Region of Peel, including the City of
Mississauga, the City of Brampton and the Town of Caledon.
Before an EDC by-law can be passed, school boards must ensure they:
• Demonstrate that their elementary or secondary enrolment on a jurisdiction-wide
basis is greater than the elementary or secondary Ministry approved On-The-
Ground capacity or that their EDC reserve fund is in a deficit position;
• Prepare a background study meeting the requirements of the legislation;
• Hold required legislated public meetings; and
• Receive written Ministry approval of the projected number of students and school
sites.
PDSB is able to enact a new by-law on the basis of:
• Reserve Fund Qualification – The Board has a deficit in the EDC reserve fund
and outstanding financial obligations.
The Board intends to hold statutory public meetings to inform the public as to the new
proposed EDC by-law. The Board will hold such meetings on May 14, 2019 at the
Board’s main office as part of their regularly scheduled Board meetings and will
consider passage of the EDC bylaws at an additional Board meeting on May 28, 2019.
Further details are provided in the Board public meeting notice contained in this report.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE ii
Demographic projections form an important component of the EDC analysis. The
residential dwelling unit forecast is used both to project pupils from new development as
well as determining the final quantum of the residential charge. The residential
forecasts used in this analysis are consistent with the most recent and available area
forecasts that were available at the time of study preparation. The number of net new
units projected in the jurisdiction for the 15 years in the EDC analysis totals 109,499 for
the Region of Peel.
The number of growth-related pupils is based on the aforementioned residential
forecast and pupil yields have been derived from Statistics Canada custom tabulated
data and historical board enrolment information. Pupil yields are mathematical
representations of the number of school-aged children that will be generated by
particular dwellings. The total growth-related pupils must be offset by any available
pupil places that are not required by existing pupils of the Board. These calculations
were done for the Board on a municipal basis to determine the total net growth-related
pupil places. The 15-year growth projection analysis projects a total of 18,555
elementary net growth-related pupils and 5,149 secondary net growth-related pupils for
the PDSB.
Once the net growth-related pupil place requirements have been determined, it is
necessary for the Board to decide the number of new schools that will be built to
accommodate that need. The EDC legislation provides a table which relates pupil place
requirements to school site sizes. The table, as well as a description and methodology,
are provided in the background study. The study also provides information on the
approximate timing, size and location of the proposed new schools/sites.
The EDC analysis projects that the PDSB will require 23 new elementary sites – 3 sites
are located in the City of Mississauga, 17 sites are located in the City of Brampton and
3 sites are located in the Town of Caledon. In addition, the Board will require 4 new
secondary sites – 2 of which are located in the City of Brampton and the remaining 2
sites are located in the Town of Caledon. A detailed summary of the site requirements
can be found in each region’s Form G in Appendix A.
One of the final steps of the EDC process involves translating the land requirements to
actual land costs. Estimated appraised values for new school sites are based on
appraisals completed by the firm of Cushman & Wakefield. The per acre appraised
values ranged from $1,415,000 to $3,090,000 for the elementary sites, and between
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE iii
$1,415,000 and $1,420,000 for the secondary sites. Similar to many areas in Ontario,
the cost to acquire land has been increasing in the region. Land acquisition costs are
escalated to the time of site purchase at a rate of 2.5% per year.
The costs to prepare and develop a school site for school construction are also EDC
eligible costs. The assumed site preparation costs are based on historical data
provided by the Board. A site preparation cost of $13,000 per acre has been assumed
for the PDSB in this study. Site preparation costs are escalated to the time of site
purchase at a rate of 1.6% per year.
The total land costs (acquisition and servicing costs) as well as study costs must be
included by the Board to determine the final net education land costs. The PDSB’s total
net education land costs are estimated to be $422,935,331.
On the basis of the aforementioned net education land costs and net new unit forecasts,
the analysis resulted in a proposed EDC rate of $3,476 per dwelling unit for the
PDSB’s residential charge in the Region of Peel. In addition, the analysis proposed an
EDC rate of $0.46 per square foot for the PDSB’s non-residential charge in the Region
of Peel. The charges contained herein are based on a uniform rate for all types of
development, with 90% residential allocation/10% non-residential allocation, and
applicable jurisdiction-wide for the Region of Peel.
Report
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019
Chapter 1 Introduction
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 1-1
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
Education development charges (EDCs) are a revenue source, for school boards that
qualify, to purchase and develop land for new schools. EDCs are meant as a funding
mechanism for boards that are experiencing a growth-related accommodation need in
their jurisdiction. In order to qualify for education development charges, it is necessary
for school boards to meet certain “triggers.”
School boards no longer have the ability to implement property taxes to fund education
costs and now rely on a system of per pupil grants established by the Ministry of
Education. The grants are set out to cover expenses such as teacher salaries,
textbooks, heating of schools, renewing schools, building schools, etc. Education
development charges are meant to fund the acquisition and development of growth-
related school sites outside this grant envelope. Education development charges are
based on a formulaic approach which looks at three main areas – enrolment projections
to determine need, the number of school sites necessary to meet need and the costs
related to the purchase and development of those school sites.
The EDC may be levied by a school board on both residential and non-residential
developments, subject to certain exemptions which are outlined in the legislation.
Division E of Part IX of the Education Act is the legislation responsible for governing the
EDC. Ontario Regulation 20/98, as amended, provides guidelines and requirements on
the qualification process for a school board, as well as the specifics on calculating the
charge. The charges are collected at building permit issuance on behalf of the school
board by the local area municipality in the by-law’s area.
In order for a school board to qualify to implement EDCs, there are two triggers that can
be met. First, the Board’s total projected enrolment for the 5-year period following
expected by-law passage must exceed the Board’s Ministry rated On-The-Ground
capacity on either the elementary or the secondary panel.
The second qualification trigger deals with unmet financial obligations with regard to the
purchase and development of growth-related school sites. If the school board has an
existing EDC by-law in place and they can demonstrate that there are existing
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 1-2
outstanding financial obligations, the school board will automatically qualify for a
subsequent by-law. The Education Act, specifically Section 257.54, gives school
boards the ability to “pass by-laws for the imposition of education development charges”
if there is residential land in the jurisdiction of a board that would increase education
land costs.
School boards are responsible for providing school sites and can do so through such
limited revenue sources as selling surplus school sites, revenue from leasing sites,
entering into joint use agreements with other school boards or public/private
partnerships and the imposition of education development charges – thus making EDCs
an important revenue source.
1.2 Existing By-Laws
This EDC Background Study has been prepared on behalf of the Peel District School
Board (PDSB) in consideration of renewing their EDC by-law in the Region of Peel. The
Board’s current in-force by-laws came into effect on July 1 of 2014 and are based on
90% recovery of costs from residential development. The current EDC residential rate
is $3,224 per dwelling unit and the non-residential rate is $0.45 per square foot.
Current In-force EDC By-laws for the PDSB:
School Board
In-force Date
% Residential/ Non-residential
Area of By-law
Charge ($/Unit)
Charge ($/Sq.Ft.)
PDSB July 1 2014
90%(Res) - 10%(Non-Res)
Region of Peel
$3,224 $0.45
EDC Policy Review
It should be noted that all school boards with an existing EDC by-law in place must
conduct a review of the policies contained in their existing by-laws before passing a new
by-law. This process includes a policy review report as well as a public meeting to
review the policies in a public forum.
Section 257.60 sub-section (1) of the Education Act states that:
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 1-3
“Before passing an education development charge by-law, the board shall conduct a review of the education development charge policies of the board.”
Sub-section (2) goes on to state that:
“In conducting a review under subsection (1), the board shall ensure that adequate information is made available to the public, and for this purpose shall hold at least one public meeting, notice of which shall be given in at least one newspaper having general circulation in the area of jurisdiction of the board.”
1.3 Area in Which By-law May Apply
The legislation states that an education development charge by-law may apply to the
entire area of the jurisdiction of a board or only part of it. In addition, an education
development charge by-law of the board shall not apply with respect to land in more
than one “region” if the regulations divide the area of the jurisdiction of the board into
prescribed “regions.” For the purpose of this study, the Board only has one region, with
the by-law enforced in the Region of Peel.
Finally, “education development charges collected under an education development
charge by-law that applies to land in a District shall not, except with the prior written
approval of the Minister, be used in relation to land that is outside that District” and
“money from an EDC reserve fund established under section 16(1) of O.Reg. 20/98 may
be used only for growth-related net education land costs attributed to or resulting from
development in the area to which the EDC by-law applies.”
EDC background studies should clearly outline the areas that will be covered by EDC
by-laws. Two maps have been included on the following pages outlining the Board’s
jurisdiction, indicating the area to which the EDC by-law will apply (i.e. Region of Peel)
as well as the review areas for the Board by panel.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 1-4
1.4 EDC Review Areas
The EDC methodology allows school boards to examine growth-related needs on a
jurisdiction-wide basis – that is, treat the whole EDC area as one review area – or to
examine them on a sub-area basis or review areas. Review areas are artificial
constructs intended to divide the Board’s jurisdiction into sub-areas in order to more
accurately determine the location of new school sites. Board review areas are likely to
reflect attendance boundaries for families of schools, natural dividers such as rivers,
creeks, etc., or man-made barriers such as major thoroughfares. The Ministry of
Education’s EDC Guidelines recommend that review areas are consistent with school
board review areas used for capital planning purposes and that they also maintain
consistency with review areas of subsequent EDC by-laws.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 1-5
PDSB EDC (2019) – Elementary Review Areas
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 1-6
PDSB EDC (2019) – Secondary Review Areas
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 1-7
The PDSB’s review areas used in this background study are somewhat consistent with
the Board’s review areas used in their long-term accommodation studies. For the
purpose of calculating an EDC, the PDSB has used a total of 33 elementary review
areas and 10 secondary review areas.
Elementary Review Areas
ERA01 - SOUTH OF QEW / WEST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF LAKE / EAST OF
PEEL BND
ERA02 - SOUTH OF QEW / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF LAKE /EAST OF
CREDIT RIVER
ERA03 - SOUTH OF 403 / WEST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF QEW
ERA04a - SOUTH OF 403 / EAST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF QEW / WEST OF
CAWTHRA RD – a
ERA04b - SOUTH OF 403 / EAST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF QEW / WEST OF
CAWTHRA RD – b
ERA05 - SOUTH OF 401 /WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF QEW /EAST OF
CAWTHRA RD
ERA06 - SOUTH OF BRITANNIA RD / WEST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL / NORTH
OF 403/ EAST OF PEEL BND
ERA07 - SOUTH OF BRITANNIA RD / WEST OF CREDIT RIVER & RAILWAY /
NORTH OF 403 / EAST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL
ERA08 - SOUTH OF 401 / WEST OF HURONTARIO & MAVIS / NORTH OF 403 /
EAST OF CREDIT RIV & RAIL
ERA09 - SOUTH OF BRITANNIA & 401 / WEST OF TOMKEN RD / NORTH OF 403 /
EAST OF MAVINS
ERA10 - SOUTH OF RAILWAY / WEST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL / NORTH OF
BRITANNIA RD / EAST OF PEEL BND
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 1-8
ERA11 - SOUTH OF RAIL & 401 / WEST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF
BRITANNIA RD / EAST OF WINSTON CHURCHILLERA012
ERA12 - SOUTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / WEST OF HURONTARIO / NORTH OF 401
/ EAST OF PEEL BND
ERA13 - SOUTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / WEST OF EPPL BND / NORTH OF 401 /
EAST OF HURONTARIO
ERA14 - SOUTHEAST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST
OF PEEL BND
ERA15 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF CHINGUACOUSY / NORTHWEST OF
CREDIT RIVER
ERA16 - SOUTH OF RAIL / WEST OF HURONTARIO / NORTH OF STEELES / EAST
OF CHINGUACOUSY
ERA17 - SOUTH OF STEELES / WEST OF HURONTARIO / NBORTH OF B & M CITY
LIMITS / EAST OF RAIL
ERA18 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / WEST OF 410 / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS /
EAST OF HURONTARIO
ERA19 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / WEST OF AIRPORT RD / NORTH OF B & W CITY
LIMITS / EAST OF 410
ERA20 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF B & M CITY
LIMITS / EAST OF AIRPORT RD
ERA21a - SOUTH OF MAYFIELD RD / WEST OF MCLAUGHLIN / CREDITVIEW/
NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF PEEL BND – a
ERA21b - SOUTH OF MAYFIELD RD / WEST OF MCLAUGHLIN / CREDITVIEW/
NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF PEEL BND – b
ERA22 - SOUTH OF WANLESS/MAYFIELD / WEST OF HURONTARIO/RAIL / NORTH
OF RAIL / WEST OF CREDITIVIEW
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 1-9
ERA23 - SOUTH OF B& C CITY LIMITS/WEST OF 410 / NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST
OF HURONTARIO
ERA24a - SOUTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF GOREWAY / NORTH OF
BOVAIRD / EAST OF 410 – a
ERA24b - SOUTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF GOREWAY / NORTH OF
BOVAIRD / EAST OF 410 – b
ERA25a - SOUTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF
BOVAIRD / EAST OF GOREWAY – a
ERA25b - SOUTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF
BOVAIRD / EAST OF GOREWAY – b
ERA26a – MAYFIELD
ERA26b - SOUTH OF OLD BASE LINE RD / WEST OF AIRPORT RD / NORTH OF
B&C CITY LIMITS/EAST OF PEEL BND – b
ERA27 - S OF CAL EAST BND/OLD BASELINE/CASTLEDERG/W OF PEEL BND/N
OF B&C CITY LIMITS/E OF AIRPORT
ERA28 - S OF PEEL BND / W OF PEEL BND / N OF OLD BASELINE / CAL EAST
BND / CASTLEDERG/ WEST OF PEEL BND
Secondary Review Areas
SRA01 - SOUTH OF 403 & 401 / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF LAKE ONTARIO /
EAST OF PEEL BND
SRA02 - SOUTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / WEST OF 410 / NORTH OF 403 / EAST OF
PEEL BND
SRA03 - SOUTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF 401 /
EAST OF 410
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 1-10
SRA04 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD & RAIL / WEST OF CHINGUACOUSY / NORTH OF B
& M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF PEEL BND
SRA05 - SOUTH OF B & C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF 410 / NORTH OF B & M CITY
LIMITS / EAST OF CHINGUACOUSY
SRA06 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / WEST OF AIRPORT RD / NORTH OF B & M CITY
LIMITS / EAST OF 410
SRA07 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD /CASTLEMORE / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF
B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF AIRPORT RD
SRA08 – SOUTH OF OLD BASELINE/ WEST OF AIRPORT/GOREWAY/ NOTH OF
BOVAIRD / EAST OF 410 / NORTH OF MAYFIELD/EAST OF PEEL BND
SRA09 - SOUTH OF PEEL BND / WEST OF LINE BTWN ST ANDREWS &
MOUNTAINVIEW/ NORTH OF OLD BASELINE/ EAST OF PEEL BND
SRA10 - SOUTH OF PEEL BND / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF MAYFIELD /
EAST OF AIRPORT / ST ANDRES / MOUNTAINVIEW
The EDC calculation on a review area basis assumes that the total OTG capacity of all
existing permanent accommodation within the review area is considered to be the total
available capacity for instructional purposes and is required to meet the needs of the
existing community. Determining board needs on a review area basis is premised on:
Available space is determined by subtracting the Year 15 existing community
enrolment number from the current OTG capacity figure;
Pupils that are generated from new development must fill any available surplus
OTG capacity first; and
Pupils generated from new development, above and beyond those that fill any
available surplus space within the review area, are net growth-related pupil place
requirements and can potentially be funded through education development
charges.
The review area approach to calculating an EDC has been undertaken by the Board as
it is consistent with the way in which future capital construction needs will be assessed
over the long term.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019
Chapter 2 The EDC By-law
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 2-1
2. The EDC By-law
2.1 Imposition of an EDC
The passage of an education development charge by-law gives school boards the
authority to impose and collect EDCs for the purpose of acquiring and developing
growth-related school sites. Each by-law has a maximum term of 5 years and must be
passed within one year of EDC background study completion. Before a school board
can proceed with an EDC by-law, it must receive confirmation in writing from the
Ministry of Education acknowledging receipt of the background study and approving
estimates of enrolment projections and future site needs contained in the background
study.
Section 10 of Ontario Regulation 20/98 sets out the conditions that must be satisfied in
order for a board to pass an education development charge by-law:
The Minister has approved the board’s estimates of the total number of
elementary and secondary pupils over each of the fifteen years of the forecast
period;
The Minister has approved the board’s estimates of the number of elementary
and secondary school sites used by the board to determine the net education
land costs;
The board has demonstrated that the average elementary or secondary
enrolment within its jurisdiction exceeds the board’s elementary or secondary
capacity; or the board’s current EDC financial obligations exceed revenues
reported in the EDC reserve fund;
The board has prepared a background study and given a copy of the education
development charge background study relating to the by-law to the Minister and
each board having jurisdiction within the area to which the by-law would apply;
The area to which the board proposes the EDC by-law is enforced and charges
are imposed, is the same area that was subject to the EDC charge by-law in
force on August 31, 2018; and
The board provides any information regarding the calculation of the education
development charge if requested by the Minister upon the review of the
background study.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 2-2
2.2 The Background Study
An education development charge background study must be completed by a school
board that wishes to pass an EDC by-law. The intention of the background study is to
provide information on the process and methodology of calculating an EDC, as well as
the background and assumptions that make up the estimates of the enrolment
projections and site needs.
Section 257.61 (1) of the Act requires that “before passing an education development
charge by-law, the board shall complete an education development charge background
study.”
Section 257.61 (2) of the Act, as well as O.Reg. 20/98 section 9 (1) and (2) set out the
following information that must be included in an EDC background study:
Section 9 (1):
Estimates of the anticipated amount, type and location of new dwelling units for
each year of the fifteen-year forecast period in the area in which the charge is to
be imposed;
The number of projected new pupil places as a result of new growth and the
number of new school sites needed to provide accommodation for those
students;
The number of existing pupil places by school and the number of available
spaces to accommodate the projected number of new pupil places;
For every existing elementary and secondary pupil place in the board’s
jurisdiction that the board does not intend to use to accommodate pupils from
new growth, an explanation as to why the board does not intend to do so;
Section 9 (2):
For each elementary and secondary school site, estimates of the net education
land cost, the location of the site, the area of the site (including the area that
exceeds the maximum set out in section 2 of O.Reg. 20/98, and an explanation
of whether the costs of the excess land are education land costs and if so, why);
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 2-3
The number of pupil places the board estimates will be provided by the school to
be built on the site and the number of those pupil places that the board estimates
will be used to accommodate new pupil places;
The EDC Guidelines suggest that school boards are required to provide the Ministry
with a copy of the final background study at least 40 days prior to the anticipated by-law
passage date. In addition, the background study must be made available to the public
at least two weeks prior to the legislated public meeting.
2.3 Public Meetings
Before a school board can pass an EDC by-law, the legislation requires that the board
hold at least two public meetings. The purpose of the public meetings are to review the
existing EDC policies of the Board and to also advise any interested stakeholders and
the public at large of the board’s intentions and address the new proposed EDC by-law.
The public meeting also gives the community and stakeholders the opportunity to voice
any issues or concerns they have with regard to the proposed by-law. The Board is
holding an additional public meeting is to consider passage of the new by-law.
The board is required to provide at least 20 days’ notice of the meetings and must make
the background study, as well as the new proposed by-law, available to the public at
least two weeks in advance of the first public meeting. O.Reg. 20/98 states that notice
of a public meeting can be given in two ways:
To every owner of land in the area to which the proposed by-law would apply by
personal service, fax or mail; and
By publication in a newspaper that is, in the secretary of the school board’s
opinion, of sufficiently general circulation in the area to which the proposed by-
law would apply to give the public reasonable notice of the meeting.
If a school board already has an existing in-force EDC by-law in place, the board must
hold an additional meeting to review the existing policies of the current EDC by-law.
This part of the process is necessary in order to fulfil the requirements of the policy
review process. It should be noted that this policy review meeting can be addressed by
the board during its first EDC public meeting.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 2-4
The Board intends to hold public meetings to inform the public as to the new proposed
EDC by-law. The Board will hold such meetings on May 14, 2019. In addition, the
Board will consider passage of the bylaw at a meeting on May 28, 2019. All meetings
will take place at the Board’s main office prior to their regularly scheduled Board
meeting. Both meetings will start at 7:00PM. Detailed notices will be issued in advance
of the meetings as per legislative requirements. A copy of the notice has been included
on the following page.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS
PEEL DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Board Room, HJA Brown Education Centre
5650 Hurontario Street, Mississauga, Ontario
EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, May 14, 2019 at 7:00 p.m., the Peel District School Board (the "Board") will hold a public meeting pursuant to subsection
257.60(2) of the Education Act (the "Act") at the location shown above.
The Board has begun the process of preparing a successor education development charge by-law for the Region of Peel. The purpose of this policy
review meeting on May 14, 2019 will be to review the current education development charge policies of the Board and to solicit public input. All
interested persons are invited to attend. Any person who attends the meeting may make a representation to the Board in respect of the policies. The
Board will also consider any written submissions.
AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that, immediately following the policy review meeting referred to above, the Board will hold a second public meeting on
Tuesday, May 14, 2019 at the same location pursuant to section 257.63 of the Education Act to consider proposed education development charges
which may be imposed pursuant to an education development charge bylaw against land undergoing development in the Region of Peel.
The purpose of the second meeting on May 14, 2019 will be to inform the public generally about the education development charge proposal of the
Board for the Region of Peel and to permit any person who attends the meeting to make a representation to the Board relating to the proposed charges.
All interested persons are invited to attend. The Board will also consider any written submissions.
AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that the Board will consider enacting a successor by-law imposing education development charges in the Region of Peel at a
public meeting to be held on Tuesday, May 28, 2019 at 7:30 p.m. at the location shown above. All interested parties are invited to attend. Any person who
attends the meeting may make representations to the Board in respect of this matter. Written submissions, filed in advance of the meeting, will also be considered.
Should a successor by-law be passed on such date, collection of education development charges pursuant to such by-law may commence on June 2, 2019. All submissions received in writing and those opinions expressed at the public meetings will be considered prior to the Board's decision.
A copy of the proposed education development by-law for the Region of Peel and the education development charge background study (including the
Board’s policy review analysis) required pursuant to sections 257.60 and 257.61 of the Act in connection therewith will be available on request during regular business hours beginning on April 9, 2019 in the Planning and Accommodation Department at the Board's administrative offices, 5650
Hurontario Street, Mississauga, Ontario and will also be posted on the Board’s website (www.peelschools.org).
The Board would appreciate receiving written submissions one week prior to the public meetings referred to herein so that they may be distributed to trustees prior to the meetings. Submissions and requests to address the Board as delegations should be submitted to: Suzanne Blakeman, Peel District School Board, Tel: (905) 890-1010 ext. 2216.
Any comments or requests for further information regarding this matter may be directed to Suzanne Blakeman, Manager, Planning and Accommodation Support Services, Peel District School Board at (905) 890-1010 ext. 2216.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 2-6
Stakeholder Participation
In addition to the legislated public meetings, the Ministry encourages school boards to
include relevant stakeholders in the EDC process and discussions. Local developers or
development associations, as well as municipalities should be contacted in advance of
the public meetings to ensure they are aware of the proposed EDC and to bring to light
any potential issues, etc. It is essential that stakeholders are part of the process and
that the discussions remain transparent at all times to help ensure smooth passage of
the EDC by-law.
The Board will work closely with stakeholders and ensure they are provided with
appropriate materials and have opportunities to provide feedback. This ensures
consistency in the data and assumptions used in the calculation of the charges. Growth
forecasts used for the EDC analysis are consistent with the most recent and available
Regional forecasts. Stakeholders were made aware of the Board’s EDC process and
the Board will also hold a stakeholder information session on April 3, 2019.
2.4 Exemptions, Expiration, Collection
Exemptions
The EDC by-law is subject to certain statutory exemptions for both residential and non-
residential collection. The exemptions for residential development deal with residential
intensification and replacement of units. If a new unit is added to an existing dwelling
unit, for example, a single detached unit is converted to a duplex, the additional unit is
exempt from EDCs. Section 3 of O.Reg. 20/98 sets out the classes of residential
buildings and the maximum number of dwelling units that can be added under the
exemption.
The legislation also allows for exemptions dealing with the replacement of residential
units when the unit has been destroyed by fire, demolition or otherwise, or has been
rendered uninhabitable, subject to certain conditions prescribed under Section 4 of
O.Reg. 20/98.
Non-residential statutory exemptions deal similarly with additions/enlargements of
space and replacement of existing non-residential space which has been destroyed. A
non-residential development that includes the enlargement of existing industrial space,
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 2-7
up to 50% of the gross floor area of the existing development, is exempt from EDCs as
per section 257.55 of Division E of the Education Act. Replacement of non-residential
building space is exempt from EDCs if the existing space was destroyed by fire,
demolition or otherwise, or has been rendered uninhabitable, subject to certain
conditions in Section 5 of O.Reg. 20/98.
In addition to the exemptions mentioned, the legislation allows for a limited non-
residential exemption for certain institutional developments. Section 257.54 (5) of the
Education Act stipulates that, “No land, except land owned by and used for the
purposes of a board or municipality, is exempt from an EDC under a by-law passed
under subsection (1) by reason only that it is exempt from taxation under Section 3 of
the Assessment Act.”
School boards may also decide to impose their own non-statutory exemptions to certain
developments, both residentially and non-residentially. Non-statutory exemptions are
entirely at the discretion of the board and any EDC revenues lost as a result cannot be
recovered.
Expiration
A school board can specify any date as the expiration date of the EDC by-law as long
as the term of the by-law does not exceed 5 years. The exception to this rule is that the
EDC by-law of one school board automatically expires on the same date as an existing
by-law of a co-terminous school board if they are in force in any part of the same area.
Section 17 of O.Reg. 20/98 prescribes the conditions dealing with this special rule of
expiry of by-laws.
Collection
The EDC is collected by local municipalities on behalf of the school boards at the time a
building permit is issued. The funds are deposited into an EDC reserve fund by the
Board. The municipality, under the legislation, cannot issue a building permit if the
education development charge has not been paid. In addition to collecting the charge
and transferring the monies to the school boards, municipalities are also required to
provide the boards with detailed reports respecting all EDC transactions (Section 20 of
O.Reg. 20/98). At a minimum, each report should cover the total EDCs that have been
collected, the number of building permits issued (or GFA for non-residential), any
exemptions granted and any permits that were issued without an EDC being paid.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 2-8
The municipalities do not receive any remuneration for collecting EDCs on behalf of the
school boards; however, municipalities are allowed to retain any interest earned on the
monthly EDC balances.
2.5 Appeals and Amendments
Appeals
The education development charge by-law can be appealed by any individual or
organization in accordance with the provisions in the Education Act. Sections 257.64 to
257.69 of the Act outline the legislation dealing with an appeal of an EDC by-law. The
by-law is subject to appeal for a maximum of 40 days after the by-law has been passed.
The school boards must provide written notice that an EDC by-law has been passed
(within 20 days of passage) and this notice must include information on how to file an
appeal.
An appeal of an EDC by-law goes to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT)
formerly known as the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), to be decided. All appeals must
be filed in writing with the secretary of the school board within the allotted time allowed.
The reasons for the appeal must be included in the notice. It is the responsibility of the
secretary of the school board to forward a copy of the Notice of Appeal to the LPAT
within 30 days after the last day of the appeal period. In addition to the Notice of
Appeal, the secretary must provide:
A copy of the by-law certified by the secretary;
A copy of the background study;
An affidavit or declaration certifying that notice of the passing of the by-law was
provided in accordance with the Education Act; and
The original or true copy of all written submissions and material relevant to the
by-law.
After hearing an appeal, the LPAT may decide to:
Dismiss the appeal in whole or in part;
Order the board to repeal or amend the by-law; or
Repeal or amend the by-law itself.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 2-9
If the by-law is repealed, the EDCs that have already been paid must be refunded. If
the by-law is amended and the amended charge is lower than the original charge, the
difference must be refunded. All refunds are due within 30 days of the by-law being
repealed or amended. While the LPAT does have the power to repeal or amend the by-
law, they are not able to increase the quantum of the charge, remove or reduce the
scope of discretionary exemptions or change the expiration date of the by-law.
Amendments
The EDC legislation gives school boards the authority to amend their by-laws. Section
257.70 (1) of the Act states, “Subject to subsection (2), a board may pass a by-law
amending an education development charge by-law.” There are certain limitations to an
EDC amendment, specifically laid out in s. 257.70 (2) of the Act,
A board may not amend an education development charge by-law so as to do any one of the following more than once in the one-year period immediately following the coming into force of the by-law or in any succeeding one-year period:
Increase the amount of an EDC.
Remove or reduce the scope of an exemption.
Extend the term of the by-law.
There are a variety of reasons why school boards may feel the need to amend their by-
law. School boards may be paying more for school sites than what was estimated in
the EDC and may need to increase their land cost assumptions or they may need to
change a discretionary exemption. The board does not need Ministry approval to pass
an amending by-law; however, boards are required to provide proper notice proposing
an amendment and of the amendment itself. Boards are also required to ensure that
the original EDC background study is available, as well as any additional information
that would explain the reason for the amendment. A public meeting is not required to
pass an amending by-law, but it is recommended.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019
Chapter 3 The Process and Methodology of Calculating an Education Development Charge
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 3-1
3. The Process and Methodology of Calculating an Education Development Charge
The following Chapter will outline the procedures and methodologies utilized to
calculate the EDC. As mentioned earlier in this report, the EDC calculation is formulaic
and technical in nature and encompasses three main components – demographic
projections, determination of need (new school sites) and the associated costs.
3.1 Eligibility
School boards must first qualify by meeting certain criteria in order to be eligible to
impose EDCs. The first criterion deals with the board’s average projected enrolment
compared to its OTG capacity. The second criterion, available only to school boards
who have an existing in-force by-law, deals with outstanding EDC financial obligations.
Capacity Trigger
If a school board’s average elementary or secondary enrolment on a jurisdiction-wide
basis over the 5 years following proposed by-law passage is greater than the board’s
elementary or secondary OTG capacity, then it is eligible to impose an EDC.
Qualification on either panel allows the board to impose EDCs throughout its jurisdiction
for both elementary and secondary new school sites. Form A of the EDC submission
sets out a board’s projected average daily enrolment over the proposed 5-year term of
the EDC by-law (2019 to 2024), as compared to its OTG capacity on both the
elementary and secondary panels.
The OTG capacity for the EDC is typically based on the Ministry-approved permanent
capacity according to the School Facilities Inventory System on the proposed date the
new by-law is to come into force. Additional adjustments may be made to the capacity
figure used in the study, in consultation with Ministry staff and for circumstances such
as:
OTG capacity of schools that are transferred from one panel to the other within
12 months of by-law passage may be attributed to the panel the school will be
used for after the transfer is complete. The boards must have a passed
resolution for this to take effect;
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 3-2
The capacity of all schools or additions under construction and that are planned
for opening within 12 months of the by-law coming into force are to be included in
the capacity determination;
Purpose-built space (i.e. special education, adult education, outdoor education
facilities) that cannot be reasonably used to accommodate pupils from new
growth may be excluded from the permanent capacity determination;
The capacity of a leased school must be included if the school has a “New Pupil
Place” capacity attributed to it; and
Any schools that have been closed (in accordance with the Boards’ school
closure policy) may be excluded from the permanent capacity. In addition, if a
school is scheduled to close during the tenure of the by-law (with Board passed
resolution) then the capacity may also be excluded.
The Board has determined a permanent capacity of 130,818 on the elementary panel
and 46,203 on the secondary panel.
PDSB does not meet the capacity trigger on the either panel. The average projected
enrolment from 2019/20 to 2023/24 is 117,330 on the elementary panel, compared with
a permanent capacity of 130,818 – resulting in 13,488 surplus spaces. On the
secondary panel, the average project enrolment is 43,379, compared with a permanent
capacity of 46,203 – resulting in 2,824 surplus spaces.
Form A from the EDC Ministry Submission for the Board can be found on the
following page.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 3-3
Peel District School Board– Form A
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form A - Eligibility to Impose an EDC
A.1.1: CAPACITY TRIGGER CALCULATION - ELEMENTARY PANEL
Elementary
Elementary Average Average
Panel Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Projected Projected
Board-Wide 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ Enrolment Enrolment
EDC Capacity 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Over Five less
Years Capacity
130,818.0 115,632 116,511 117,420 117,979 119,106 117,330 -13,488
A.1.2: CAPACITY TRIGGER CALCULATION - SECONDARY PANEL
Secondary Average Secondary
Panel Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Projected Projected
Board-Wide 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ Enrolment Enrolment
EDC Capacity 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Over Five less
Years Capacity
46,203.0 41,682 42,650 43,247 44,454 44,864 43,379 -2,824
Projected Elementary Panel Enrolment
Projected Secondary Panel Enrolment
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 3-4
Financial Obligations
A school board that has an existing EDC by-law in place and has outstanding financial
obligations related to its existing by-law that exceed the balance of the EDC reserve
fund, is eligible to impose EDCs. It is possible for a board to have sufficient capacity to
accommodate projected enrolment, yet still be obligated to pay for sites that have been
purchased as a result of a growth-related need. Outstanding financial obligations can
result from a board not having collected enough revenue because of growth shortfalls or
an increase in land prices, or if a board has purchased school sites earlier than what
was projected in the background study.
This financial obligation eligibility trigger was added to the original capacity trigger
criteria with an amendment to O.Reg. 20/98 and came into force on March 12th, 2002.
For school boards to qualify under this trigger, an EDC financial obligation must be
demonstrated in the background study, including the following required information:
Have a previous by-law in effect after September 1, 1999;
Funds borrowed from the EDC reserve fund must be reconciled back;
Copies of Appendix D1 and D2 must be provided;
A transaction history of EDC financial activity must be provided from the last
Appendix D1 and D2 statements to proposed by-law implementation; and
A repayment schedule outlining the elimination of the EDC financial obligation.
An outstanding EDC financial obligation exists if the adjusted outstanding principal as
per Appendix D of the Board’s financial statements (plus any adjustments made), is
greater than the adjusted EDC reserve fund balance from Appendix D (including
adjustments).
The PDSB’s EDC reserve fund for the by-law is estimated to have outstanding EDC
Financial Obligation of $119,576,810 in the Region of Peel. This means that the
reserve fund is currently in a deficit position and qualifies the Board to pursue additional
by-law in the Region of Peel.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 3-5
3.2 Demographic Projections
The demographic projections respecting school enrolment and housing and population
growth form an important basis for the entire EDC analysis. These projections
ultimately determine eligibility, need and the final quantum of the charge. The housing
unit forecasts contained in this study are consistent with the most recent Regional
forecasts that were available at the time of study. Background, methodologies and
overviews of both the enrolment and housing forecasts can be found in Chapter 4 of this
report.
The demographic projection requirements of the EDC consist of three distinct
components: projecting the number of annual building permits that will be issued for
new dwelling units and new non-residential space; projecting enrolment of the existing
community; and projecting enrolment from new housing growth.
New Dwelling Units/Non-residential Space
The number of new dwelling units in the area of the EDC by-law must be estimated for
each of the next fifteen years. The forecast is set out by three types of development –
low density (single and semi-detached homes), medium density (townhouses) and high
density (apartments) – and is broken down by the Board review areas that were outlined
earlier in this report.
The forecast is set out by varying types/densities of development for two reasons. The
first is that different types of developments produce school-aged children in different
ways. Defining various types of developments allows for greater accuracy when
projecting the number of new pupils arising from new developments. The second
reason is to be able to calculate a differentiated charge should the Board choose to do
so. The Board has the ability to charge a uniform EDC rate across all types of
development – meaning that the EDC is one rate for a single-family home or an
apartment – or it can choose to charge separate rates depending on the type or density
of development.
There are situations, as defined by the legislation, where certain developments are
exempt from EDCs, such as housing intensification. A forecast of net new dwelling
units should ensure that these exempt units are factored into any forecast and
excluded.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 3-6
In addition to a housing forecast, projections of new non-residential space must also be
provided in the EDC study to allow for the calculation of the non-residential component
of the charge.
A forecast of new non-residential space estimated to be built in the by-law area must be
provided for each of the fifteen years following by-law inception. The non-residential
forecast can be estimated in two ways: by gross floor area of non-residential space; or
by the estimated declared value of future non-residential construction. As with the
residential component, there are certain statutory exemptions which must be factored
into the non-residential forecast to ensure that exempt space is excluded. These
exemptions are discussed earlier in the report.
Existing Community Projections and Projections of New Pupils
The enrolment projections required in order to calculate EDCs must be made up of two
distinct projections, one for the existing community and one for pupils from new housing
growth. This is done because ultimately the number of total growth-related pupils must
be offset by any available pupil places that are not required by pupils of the existing
community in Year 15 of the forecast. The existing community projection must
estimate, by school, the number of students for fifteen years based on the number of
existing students today and assuming no additional new housing growth. The Board’s
total OTG capacity of the review area (as of by-law inception) less the projected number
of existing community pupils in the review area in Year 15, is the Board’s total available
space.
The determination of pupils from new development is based on the aforementioned
housing forecast and the use of pupil yield factors. Pupil yields are mathematical
representations of the number of school-aged children that will be generated by a
particular dwelling over the planning forecast and that will attend a particular school
board. Pupil yields used in this analysis are based on Statistics Canada data and Board
historical enrolment information. Multiplying the pupil yield factors by the appropriate
type of developments in the net new dwelling forecast determines the projected pupils
from new development.
To determine the total net growth-related pupil place requirements, the available pupil
places (total available space referenced above) must be subtracted from the total pupils
projected from new development. Enrolment projections and the determination of net
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 3-7
growth-related pupil places can be done on a jurisdiction-wide basis or on a review area
basis. The EDC analysis in this study is based on a review area approach.
3.3 Site Needs
The final “planning” or “forecasting” step in the EDC process is determining the Board’s
site needs, specifically the number, location and size of sites for new growth-related
schools within the Board. The calculation of net growth-related pupil place
requirements ultimately determines the number of necessary sites and their size. The
regulation governing the EDC provides a table of maximum sizes depending on the
number of pupil places that will be constructed. These tables can be found below.
While the tables ultimately determine the amount/size of land that will be necessary for
new school sites, the legislation also recognizes that there may be situations in which
the necessary site for a new school may exceed the size specified in the table. For
example, a board may need a larger site to accommodate certain municipal
requirements or Ministry initiatives. Should a site exceed the legislative requirements,
justification must be included in the EDC background study.
Elementary Schools
Number of Pupils Maximum Area (acres)
1 to 400 4
401 to 500 5
501 to 600 6
601 to 700 7
701 or more 8
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 3-8
Secondary Schools
Number of Pupils Maximum Area (acres)
1 to 1000 12
1001 to 1100 13
1101 to 1200 14
1201 to 1300 15
1301 to 1400 16
1401 to 1500 17
1501 or more 18
Form G of the Ministry EDC Forms submission provides specific details on each site the
Board is proposing to acquire to construct new schools. On a site by site basis, Form G
provides information on the general location of the site (by review area or greater detail,
if available), the proposed size of the new school, the approximate timing of site
purchase, as well as the percentage of the site that is considered EDC eligible. The
Ministry also recommends that proposed site purchases for new schools are consistent
with the Board’s long-term accommodation plans.
3.4 Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs
The planning or forecasting component of the EDC analysis is critical to determining the
overall EDC eligible needs of the Board. To finalize the calculation process of the EDC,
these accommodation needs must be translated into financial requirements. The
analysis in the previous section determined the total growth-related pupil needs as well
as the amount of land (in acres) that will be required to accommodate those pupils.
EDC eligible expenses are determined by attaching costs to acquire and service the
land needed.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 3-9
Appraised land values for new sites have been determined by qualified appraisers and
the methodologies used, as well as relevant data, can be found in Chapter 5 of this
report. Servicing costs are based on historical costs provided by the Board with respect
to sites that have been recently developed. Once costs for each site have been
finalized, the next step is to determine the percentage of each site that is EDC eligible.
This is based on the percentage of net growth-related students that make up the total
capacity of the proposed new school. For example, if the new proposed school had a
capacity of 450 and 400 of the spaces were accounted for by new growth-related pupils,
then the site would be 88.88% eligible for EDCs (400/450 = 88.88%).
In addition to site acquisition and servicing costs, there are other EDC eligible expenses
that can be included in the analysis. Examples of other EDC eligible costs are:
Interest and borrowing costs related to site acquisition;
Land escalation costs;
Costs related to the preparation and distribution of EDC background studies; and
Costs related to studies of land being considered for acquisition (environmental
assessments).
Outstanding Financial Obligations
In addition to the costs that have been outlined above, any outstanding financial
obligations from previous by-laws are also eligible education land costs. A negative
balance in a board’s EDC reserve fund, established for the area to which the proposed
by-law will apply, is considered as an outstanding financial obligation and can be added
to the total net education land costs. It should be noted that if a board has a positive
balance in the EDC reserve fund, these funds must be used to defray any EDC eligible
expenditures. The total eligible costs are referred to as the total growth-related net
education land costs.
3.5 Determination of the Charge
Once the total growth-related net education land costs have been determined, there are
certain prescribed steps that must be followed to determine the actual quantum of the
EDC. As discussed in Chapter 2, the legislation allows school boards to determine the
type of EDC it will impose. The Board can impose an EDC on residential or non-
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 3-10
residential developments and can also charge a uniform rate for all types of
developments or can differentiate the rate based on dwelling unit types.
Apportionment of Land Costs
The legislation allows school boards to allocate up to 40% of their education land costs
to non-residential development. If a school board had a non-residential component to
their EDCs then the land costs would be multiplied by whatever percentage the board
deemed to be apportioned to non-residential. For example, if the total land costs were
estimated to be $1 million and the non-residential allocation was 10%, then the non-
residential growth-related net education land costs would total $100,000. The
remaining balance would make up the residential growth-related net education land
costs.
To determine the residential charge (assuming a uniform charge), the total residential
growth-related net education land costs are divided over the projected number of net
new dwelling units assumed in the EDC forecast over the next fifteen years. The result
is the amount of the uniform residential EDC per dwelling unit. If charges are to be
imposed on non-residential development, there are two ways in which they can be
calculated. If the Board chooses to use a non-residential forecast of gross floor area,
then the total non-residential growth-related net education land costs are divided by the
estimated gross floor area of proposed non-residential developments. The Board can
also choose to use a non-residential forecast of estimated declared values where the
non-residential land costs are divided by the projected declared values and multiplied by
100 to get a non-residential charge.
Once the residential charge is determined, it can be charged uniformly across all types
of development or different rates can be charged depending on the types of units being
built. If the EDC is applied in a uniform manner, then the total residential land costs are
simply divided over the estimated net new dwelling units as described earlier. If the
Board chooses to impose a differentiated EDC, then the charges are apportioned on the
basis of different unit types producing different amounts of pupils. The Board may
choose to define developments as they wish (i.e. low density, high density, condos,
apartments, single family, etc.) but are encouraged to stay as consistent as possible
with categories used by the local municipalities impacted by the by-law.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 3-11
A distribution factor is determined by the distribution of growth-related pupils amongst
the various unit types defined by the Board. For example, if 100 students were from low
density developments, 50 from medium density and 10 from high density, the
distribution factors would be 62.5% for low (100/160), 31.25% for medium and 6.25%
for high. These distribution factors are then multiplied by the total residential land costs
to determine the apportioned residential land costs by development type. Each
separate amount is then divided by the number of net new units for the particular
development type to arrive at the differentiated residential EDC per unit by development
type.
A flow chart detailing the EDC process can be found on the following page. In
addition, the Ministry EDC Forms, which detail the calculations required to
determine the EDC, can be found in Appendix A at the end of this report.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 3-12
EDC Process and Methodology
DETERMINING
ELIGIBILITY
Enrolment To CapacityOutstanding Financial
Obligations
DEMOGRAPHIC
PROJECTIONS
SITE NEEDS
Total Net Growth-related
Pupils
Legislated Maximum Site
Area
Number, Location and
Size of New School Sites
NET EDUCATION
LAND COSTS
Land Acquisition CostsOutstanding Financial
ObligationsSite Preparation Costs Study Costs
DETERMINATION
OF CHARGE
Residential ForecastEnrolment Expected From
New DevelopmentNon-Residential Forecast
Existing Community
Projections
Total Net Education Land
Costs
Residential/Non-Residential
Allocation (if necessary)Differentiation of Charge
(if necessary)
BY-LAW
PASSAGE
EDC PoliciesPublic Process
By-law Implementation
And Passage
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019
Chapter 4 Demographic Projections
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-1
4. Demographic Projections
As mentioned earlier in the report, the demographic projections form the backbone of
the EDC analysis, in that they are used to determine eligibility, need and ultimately the
quantum of the charge itself. The demographic projections for an EDC consist of both
forecasts of new housing development and projections of school enrolment. Projections
of both new housing and enrolment must be provided on an annual basis for a 15-year
period following by-law imposition. The following Chapter provides the methodology
and background to the demographic projections, as well as the results of those
projections.
4.1 The Residential Growth Forecast
Residential
The residential growth forecast for the EDC is critical to the analysis because of the
direct link between new homes and new pupils for the school board. In addition to
determining a board’s needs, the number of net new projected units in the forecast is
what the total net education land costs get divided by to determine the final quantum of
the residential charge. The dwelling unit forecast contained in this study provides a
projection of the number of units on an annual basis for the next 15 years by low
(single/semis), medium (townhouses) and high (apartments) density allocations as well
as seasonal dwellings. O.Reg. 20/98 s.7(1) states that a board must, “estimate the
number of new dwelling units in the area in which charges are to be imposed for each of
the 15 years immediately following the day the by-law comes into force.”
Housing development and occupancy patterns have changed significantly over the last
decade. Housing developments are offering more choice in terms of density, such as
singles, townhomes and apartments, as well as developments that cater to specific
lifestyles or age groups (retirement residences). The new Places to Grow initiative by
the provincial government mandates that future developments will have more units on
less land, increasing the likelihood of more urban-type developments and infilling
projects in the future. The combination of new initiatives, societal shifts in housing and
the recent downturn in the economy have posed a set of unique challenges for
municipalities in the area to develop long-term population and housing projections.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-2
The development projections contained in this study are mainly derived from the Official
Plan Review, Peel 2041: Growth Management Strategy. The GMS targets the new
regional forecast as established by the Growth Plan 2017. This ensures consistency
with local and upper tier governments and other agencies. In addition, the GMS
allocated growth on both a municipal and local planning community area basis, to
ensure that anticipated population, housing and employment growth is directed to areas
where infrastructure and service investment has already been made or is expected to
be in the future.
According to regional municipal building permit data, the Region of Peel have averaged
approximately 64,700 new permits for residential construction between 2010 and 2018.
Residential building activity in the Board’s jurisdiction have generally stayed consistent
over the last several years, with a few exceptions during 2012 and 2015 where it
reached over 8,000 new units in each year, 2,000 above the 9-year annual average of
6,078.
During 2016-2018, 50% of the total units issued with a building permit occurred within
the City of Brampton, 40% within the City of Mississauga and the remaining 10% within
the Town of Caledon. Over this time-period, the Town of Caledon accounted for 15%
for low density units while the City of Brampton accounted for 75% and the remaining
10% occurred within the City of Mississauga. In addition, 75% of all high-density
building permits were issued within the City of Mississauga (5,422) from 2016-2018,
with only 336 occurring within the Town of Caledon (5%) and the remaining 18% within
Brampton. The medium density units (rows and townhouses) saw 3,823 new units from
building permits over the 2016-2018 period, with 73% within Brampton, 13% and 14%
within Caledon and Mississauga, respectively.
Region of Peel Historical Building Permit Issuance Trends
Year Area Total
2010 Region of Peel 4,491
2011 Region of Peel 6,786
2012 Region of Peel 8,066
2013 Region of Peel 4,872
2014 Region of Peel 5,922
2015 Region of Peel 8,186
2016 Region of Peel 6,786
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-3
2017 Region of Peel 4,715
2018 Region of Peel 4,878
Average 6,078
Region of Peel Building Permit Activity, 2010 - 2018
Share of total units from building permits issued between 2016-2018 by municipality within the Region of Peel
4,491
6,786
8,066
4,872
5,922
8,186
6,786
4,715 4,878
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
# o
f U
nit
s
Year
Low Density Medium Density High Density Historical Average
Source: Region of Peel building permit data, Open Data Catalogue 2019.
50%
10%
40%
City of Brampton Town of Caledon City of Mississauga
Source: Region of Peel building permit data, Open Data Catalogue 2019.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-4
The growth forecast is based on some changes in terms of how and where growth will
occur in the future. The Municipal/County forecasts project fairly sustained growth over
the next few decades with an average of approximately 7,411 new dwelling units per
year from 2019/20 to 2033/34 (15-year EDC forecast term).
REGION OF PEEL
2019/20 to 2033/34
Density Type # Of Units % By Density
Low (Single/Semi) 43,948 39.5%
Medium (Townhouses) 22,364 20.1%
High (Apartments) 44,854 40.4%
Total 111,166 100%
The final growth forecast for the Region of Peel by-law for PDSB is based on the
aforementioned data and totals 111,166 new units that are forecast to be built over the
next 15 years. Of these new units, 39.5% are estimated to be low density, 20.1%
medium density, and 40.4% high density. Comparatively, the historical building permit
data (Statistics Canada) from 2010 to 2018, indicates approximately 53% of all permits
were for low density type units (singles/semis), 19% for medium density and 29% for
high density. While the forecast averages 7,411 units for the 15-year EDC term, it is
expected that the first 5 years of the forecast will average 7,531 units per year.
Between Years 5 and 10, the forecast is expected to average 7,661 and between Years
10 and 15, the forecast is expected to average 7,041.
As mentioned previously, there is a residential statutory EDC exemption dealing with
intensification of residential units. In order to account for the intensification EDC
exemption, an adjustment to the projections was made to derive the “net” new units
housing forecast. This adjustment is intended to estimate the number of units in the
forecast that will be created by intensification – for example, transforming existing
single-family homes into duplex/apartment-type units. The overall forecast was reduced
by approximately 1.5% to estimate the number of exempt units and resulted in a
projection of 109,499 net new units. Approximately 36% of these units are expected to
be built in the City of Mississauga, 49% are expected to be built in the City of Brampton
and the remaining 15% are expected in to be built in the Town of Caledon.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-5
Non-residential
Over the next 15-year study period, the Region of Peel non-residential growth is also
expected to grow by approximately 101,695,000 sq.ft. by 2033. This accounts for a
growth of 68,515,500 sq.ft. of industrial (67%), 26,645,800 sq.ft. of commercial (26%)
and 6,533,700 sq.ft. of institutional (6%) growth, based on the Region of Peel Growth
Management Strategy background work, October 2017.
4.2 Enrolment Projections
Enrolment projections for the purposes of the EDC analysis are completed as two
separate components – enrolment of the existing community and enrolment expected
from new housing growth. The enrolment projections of the existing community are
based on a scenario of no new housing growth and examine projected enrolment of the
existing population. The projections of enrolment from new housing focus on pupils that
are generated from expected new housing developments. EDC eligible growth-related
pupils must be offset by any available space in the existing community and, thus, it is
necessary to examine enrolment projections utilizing the two separate components.
Enrolment projections have been prepared for each review area in the Board’s
jurisdiction. The existing community projections have been prepared for the Board’s
schools contained in the EDC analysis. The projections of enrolment from new housing
growth are provided on a review area basis. The enrolment projections also assume
that students are accommodated in their home attendance areas. This means that
students that are currently in a holding situation at a school outside their home school
boundary are returned to their home boundary. Holding situations typically arise when
students in a development area await new school construction and are “held” in nearby
schools until the new school is open. Situations where students are permanently
accommodated outside their home areas (i.e. program) are not affected.
Methodology
The prediction of school enrolment involves the consideration of a wide range of factors.
There are three common methods of enrolment projections: rate of growth; enrolment
ratios; and grade transition. The rate of growth method assumes that past rates of
enrolment growth or decline will carry forward. In today’s changing demographic and
economic landscape, this method of enrolment forecasting is suitable for short-term
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-6
projections but should be combined with other methodologies for longer term
projections. The enrolment ratio method looks at historical ratios of school enrolment
compared with the overall population and then carries forward these ratios or makes
assumptions about new ratios and applies them to a population forecast. The grade
transition method examines historical progression rates from grade to grade and makes
assumptions about the retention of grades from one year to the next.
Watson used a combination of the latter two methodologies – enrolment ratio and grade
transition – in conjunction with strong demographic background data and historical
Board enrolment to produce the enrolment forecasts for the EDC. The enrolment
projection methodology focuses on the relationships between demographic trends and
actual historical enrolment of the Board. The basis of the assumptions for future trends
comes from the analysis of these historical relationships.
Demographic Background
A demographic profile is compiled for each review area within the Board’s jurisdiction
using single year of age data from the 2001, 2006, 2011 and 2016 Census at the
Dissemination Area level. Trends in the demographic data are used to highlight
changes in population on both a review area and jurisdiction-wide basis. Examining
these historical trends assist in providing perspective and direction when determining
future assumptions for the projections.
The table below depicts the demographic trends for the Region of Peel for the 2006,
2011 and 2016 census periods. The total population in the jurisdiction increased by
12.0% between 2006 and 2011. In comparison, population counts grew 5.7% in Ontario
and 5.9% Canada-wide over that same time period, a difference of approximately 6%.
Between 2011 and 2016, the population in the Board’s jurisdiction continued to grow by
another 6.5%, which was still above the provincial and national rates for this same time
period, which were 4.6% and 5%, respectively. More importantly, from a school board
perspective, was the increase in the elementary school-aged (4-13 years) population
which grew by 3.9% from 2006 to 2011 and by an additional 1.1% between 2011 and
2016 – an absolute gain of 8,465 persons between 2006 and 2016. Comparably, the
secondary school-aged (14-18) population experienced greater increase, growing by
13.3% from 2006 to 2011 but was followed by a declining secondary population of
approximately 3% from 2011 to 2016. This resulted in an absolute gain of 8,510
persons aged 14-18 between 2006 and 2016.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-7
In addition to the elementary and secondary-aged population, the pre-school-aged
population and the population of females aged 25-44 were also examined for both the
2006/11 and 2011/16 time periods. These two groups are important because they are
excellent indicators of what is expected to happen in the school aged population in the
short to mid-term. The pre-school population is the cohort that will be entering the
school system in the next few years.
Females between 25 and 44 years of age are the group of women that are said to be in
their prime child-bearing years and examining this population can provide input to future
births/school-aged children. In the Board’s jurisdiction, the pre-school population and
population of females aged 25-44 both saw increased between 2006 and 2011 of 4.3%
(pre-school) and 3.0 (Females aged 25-44). Between 2011 and 2016 the female based
population continued to grow by another 1% while the pre-school aged population
decreased by 4.7%.
At the municipal level, in 2006, the City of Mississauga accounted for 58% of the
Region’s population, with Brampton making up 37% and Caledon the remaining 5%. By
2016, Mississauga’s share dropped to 52% while Brampton’s grew to 43% while
Caledon stayed consistent at 5% of the total share. This was a result of Brampton
receiving 72% of the growth from 2006 to 2016, Mississauga receiving 24% while
Caledon accounted for only 4% of the total growth. As Caledon only grew by 4% of the
total regional growth, the Town itself grew by 17% over this 10-year period from 57,000
in 2006 to 66,500 in 2016 according to Statistics Canada.
PDSB Total Jurisdiction - Demographic Trends 2006, 2011, 2016
Population Data 2006
Census Share of
Total 2011
Census Share of
Total 2016
Census Share of
Total
Total Population 1,158,085 1,296,814 1,381,145
Pre-School Population (0-3) 60,320 5.2% 62,910 4.9% 59,935 4.3%
Elementary School Population (4-13) 166,450 14.4% 173,008 13.3% 174,915 12.7%
Secondary School Population (14-18) 85,965 7.4% 97,410 7.5% 94,475 6.8%
Population Over 18 Years of Age 845,350 73.0% 963,486 74.3% 1,051,820 76.2%
Females Aged 25-44 187,420 16.2% 192,984 14.9% 194,825 14.1%
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-8
2006-2011 2011-2016
Population Data Absolute Change
% Change
Share Change
Absolute Change
% Change Share
Change
Total Population 138,729 12.0% 84,331 6.5%
Pre-School Population (0-3) 2,590 4.3% -0.4% -2,975 -4.7% -0.5%
Elementary School Population (4-13) 6,558 3.9% -1.0% 1,907 1.1% -0.7%
Secondary School Population (14-18) 11,445 13.3% 0.1% -2,935 -3.0% -0.7%
Population Over 18 Years of Age 118,136 14.0% 1.3% 88,334 9.2% 1.9%
Females Aged 25-44 5,564 3.0% -1.3% 1,841 1.0% -0.8%
A description of the relevant population age cohorts is as follows:
Pre-school aged (0-3) – used as a lead indicator of potential anticipated
enrolment in the short-term;
Elementary (4-13) – represents the predominant age structure of the students
that attend elementary schools;
Secondary (14-18) – represents the predominant age structure of the students
that attend secondary schools; and
Adult (18+) – reflects the segment of the population that does not attend
elementary or secondary school.
Females (25-44) – Group of women said to be in prime child bearing years. Can
be an indicator of future births.
The Enrolment Projection Process
Determining Entry Year Enrolment
One of the most important and most difficult components of the enrolment forecast is
predicting entry year enrolment (the Junior Kindergarten (JK) grade). Much of the
overall projection relies on the assumptions made with regard to pupils entering the
system. To develop forecasts for the JK grade, a review of historical births, pre-school
(0-3 years old) population and historical JK enrolment is undertaken. The participation
rates of the Board’s JK grade enrolment of the 4-year old population are examined from
one Census period to the next to determine future participation ratios.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-9
In addition, a population forecast of the pre-school and school aged population (0-18
years) by single year of age is prepared for the study area. This forecast is based on
the population trends of the 2001, 2006, 2011 and 2016 Census periods, as well as
other relevant demographic trends of the area. Recent fertility and death rates are
applied to the 2016 Census population and the population is aged to provide future
births and future school-aged population.
The challenge in this population forecast is to exclude growth/development in this phase
of the forecast. The total enrolment forecast is divided into two separate components –
existing enrolment and enrolment from future housing. To account for this, trends are
examined for 2001, 2006, 2011 and 2016 Census populations to estimate levels of
growth and migration that occurred between the Census periods. Assumptions arising
from this examination are used to “strip” growth/migration from the projected population
forecast to ensure that growth is not double counted.
Comparing historical JK enrolment to actual population provides ratios that are used to
determine future JK enrolment from the projected 4-year old population in the review
area. This determines the projected JK pupils for the review area for the forecast
period. These overall JK students then need to be allocated to their respective schools
in the review area. This allocation is based on historical shares combined with any
Board information on recent openings/closures or program changes that may affect
future share. Table 4.1 depicts an example of JK/Elementary participation rates
between 2006 and 2016 for one review area in the Board’s jurisdiction.
Table 4.1: An Example of Junior Kindergarten/Elementary Participation Rates (2006 – 2016)
Single Year of Age 2006 2011 2016
0 286 261 274
1 317 291 274
2 316 296 290
3 315 355 297
4 340 288 285
5 362 328 305
6 363 391 358
7 356 350 374
8 324 372 387
9 321 364 393
10 327 378 334
11 388 365 448
12 336 350 409
13 346 323 384
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-10
JK HEADCOUNT ENROLMENT 172 150 145
ELEMENTARY ENROLMENT 1,567 1,591 1,760
JK PARTICIPATION 51% 52% 51%
ELEMENTARY PARTICIPATION 45% 45% 48%
At this stage of the projections, each school in a review area will have a projected
number of JKs for the forecast period. The next step then involves using the grade
transition method to advance each grade from one year to the next. For every school in
the system, retention rates from grade to grade are calculated and applied to grade
enrolments as they are advanced through each projection year. Each school and
community can be unique when it comes to grade retention. For example, the ratio of
Kindergarten students to JK students is often higher in the more rural areas and an
indication that more students routinely enter the Senior Kindergarten (SK) grade than
would be expected, given the JK count from the previous year. Programs, such as
French Immersion, etc., can also have a significant impact on grade to grade retention.
Table 4.2 provides an example of retention rate calculations based on historical
enrolment.
Table 4.2: Retention Rate Example
Historical 2011/ 2012/ 2013/ 2014/ 2015/ 2016/
Years Grade 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
5 4 2 JK 1,484 1,562 1,539 1,559 1,605 1,730
111% 112% 110% SK 1,720 1,611 1,745 1,750 1,696 1,797
110% 111% 112% 1 1,613 1,859 1,787 1,919 1,929 1,915
104% 103% 102% 2 1,847 1,682 1,949 1,866 1,947 1,994
104% 104% 104% 3 1,982 1,911 1,765 2,016 1,934 2,047
103% 103% 103% 4 1,971 2,004 1,953 1,846 2,067 1,990
103% 103% 103% 5 2,119 2,058 2,082 2,011 1,895 2,128
102% 102% 103% 6 2,151 2,145 2,093 2,123 2,051 1,953
101% 101% 102% 7 2,184 2,144 2,174 2,114 2,148 2,093
101% 102% 102% 8 2,120 2,210 2,194 2,178 2,145 2,193
Historical enrolment trends, overall participation rates/enrolment share, as well as the
overall demographics of the area, are all examined in conjunction with the ratio of the
projected enrolment to the population. This examination looks at the reasonableness of
the projections and expected ratios and assumptions in light of recent historical trends.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-11
Secondary Enrolment Projections
The secondary enrolment projections are based largely on the elementary projections
and how the elementary students transition into the secondary panel. Each secondary
school of the Board is assigned feeder elementary schools which form a “family” of
schools based on Board data. As Grade 8 students graduate, they are assigned to their
respective secondary schools. If Grade 8 students can attend more than one
secondary school, they are then allocated based on recent trends.
The other factor involved in projecting the entry year or Grade 9 grade for the secondary
panel involves the concept of open access. In Ontario, students are permitted to attend
the secondary school of their choice, regardless of religious requirements, assuming
there is space and program availability. To account for this in the projections, the
predicted Grade 9 enrolment at a given secondary school based on its feeder schools
and historical retention rates is compared to the actual Grade 9 enrolment at the school.
This ratio provides an approximation of the net students lost or gained due to open
access.
The other important variable that is considered in the secondary enrolment projection
methodology is the impact of the fifth year of secondary school which was eliminated in
2003/04. The elimination of the fifth year of study does not mean that Grade 12
students are not allowed to come back for a fifth year of study. There are still instances
where Grade 12 students may come back to finish the 4-year program in 5 years or to
upgrade or retake certain courses. The percentage of students that are coming back for
a fifth year varies throughout the Province and even from school to school within a
Board. The projections in this analysis typically utilize a 3-year average of Grade 12
retention rates (putting greater emphasis on the last year or two), as well as input from
the Board on their experiences and expected future trends.
The remainder of the secondary projection follows the same methodology used in the
elementary projections. Grades are advanced by applying historical grade transition
rates for each school in the system. Assumptions are derived using historical ratios of
enrolment to population and are used to ensure that projected secondary enrolment
relates back to the projected secondary populations.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-12
Examining Historical Enrolment Trends
Historical enrolment provides trends that are used to help form assumptions for
projected enrolment and provides an important basis to determine relationships with
demographic data. The historical data can provide detail on things such as how the
change in enrolments compare with the changes in the school aged populations of the
same area, how different sized grade cohorts are moving through the system and how
enrolment has changed in light of new housing activity.
An important indicator when examining historical enrolment is the ratio of senior
elementary enrolment compared to junior elementary enrolment. This ratio provides a
quick “snapshot” of the current enrolment structure and can provide a short-term outlook
of expected enrolment.
The comparison is made between the senior elementary grades (6-8) and the junior
elementary grades (JK-1). Assuming full-day JK and SK, an equal number of pupils
entering JK-1 to those moving through the senior elementary grades would result in a
ratio of 1. If the ratio is higher than 1, it indicates that more pupils are leaving the
elementary system or school than are entering and could be an indicator of future
enrolment decline, at least in the short term and absent of mitigating factors. A ratio
lower than 1 indicates possible enrolment growth (at least in the short term) and is
typically found in growing areas where housing attracts young couples or young families
with children.
The ratio of senior to junior elementary enrolment for the PDSB’s total jurisdiction based
on 2016/17 enrolment is 1.08; in 2006/07, however, the ratio of senor to junior
elementary enrolment was 1.14. The decrease in this ratio between 2006/07 and
2016/17 is indicative of grade structures in the junior and senior grades starting to
equalize. The current grade structure ratio, however, has been on the rise since
2014/15 and is currently at 1.11 (2018/19). Table 4.3 outlines historical enrolment and
historical grade ratios for the Board.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-13
Table 4.3: PDSB TOTAL JURISDICTION
2006/ 2011/ 2016/ GRADES 2007 2012 2017
JK 8,600 9,790 10,448
SK 9,388 10,355 10,622
1 10,236 11,159 11,025
2 10,356 11,040 11,229
3 10,480 10,846 11,636
4 10,536 10,574 11,666
5 10,646 11,031 11,864
6 10,812 10,864 11,698
7 10,875 11,013 11,534
8 10,615 11,152 11,471
Special Education 0 0 0
Total Enrolment 102,544 107,824 113,193
Junior Elementary 28,224 31,304 32,095
Senior Elementary 32,302 33,029 34,703
GSR Ratio 1.14 1.06 1.08
The Impact of Enrolment Share
Board enrolment share refers to the share or percentage of total enrolment a board
receives between itself and its co-terminous English language board. Changes in
enrolment share can have significant impacts on board enrolment. For example,
increases in enrolment share can help mitigate declines or even increase enrolment in
areas where the total school-aged population is in decline.
The table on the following page measures the historical elementary enrolment of the
Peel District School Board(PDSB) and PDSB within the Region of Peel. PDSB has
increased its share of elementary enrolment between 2006/07 and 2016/16 – growing
approximately 4% from 66.1% in 2006/07 to 70.1% in 2016/17. Subsequently, the
DPCDSB has decreased its elementary enrolment share over the past decade,
dropping from 33.9% in in 2006/07 to 29.9% in 2016/17.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-14
ELEMENTARY PANEL
Board 2006/07 2015/16
PDSB TOTAL 107,824 113,193
DPCDSB TOTAL (Peel Region) 55,220 48,266
TOTAL OF BOTH BOARDS 163,044 161,459
PDSB SHARE 66.1% 70.1%
DPCDSB SHARE (Peel Region) 33.9% 29.9%
On the secondary panel, the PDSB has experienced a slight decrease in enrolment
share from 2006/07 to 2016/17 – from 57.1% to 55.8%. Comparably, the DPCDSB has
increased its secondary enrolment share by approximately than 1% for the same period
of time – growing from 42.9% to 44.2% in enrolment share from 2006/07 to 2016/17.
SECONDARY PANEL
Board 2006/07 2016/17
PDSB TOTAL 42,666 40,670
DPCDSB TOTAL (Peel Region) 32,095 32,215
TOTAL OF BOTH BOARDS 74,761 72,885
PDSB SHARE 57.1% 55.8%
DPCDSB SHARE (Peel Region) 42.9% 44.2%
Enrolment Expected from New Housing
The second phase of the enrolment projection methodology involves predicting housing
growth in the study area and its impact on school enrolment. Earlier in this Chapter, the
residential unit growth forecasts were explained in detail. The residential unit forecast is
used as the basis to predict future school enrolment from growth. Historical levels of
occupancy by school-aged children and by housing type provide us with factors and
trends that allow us to make assumptions about how new units might produce children
in the future. From an occupancy point of view, the number of people per housing unit
has been declining in practically every part of the Province over the last decade or
longer. In addition, the number of school-aged children per household has also been in
sharp decline. New units today are not producing the same number of people or the
same number of children as they have historically.
Each unit in the residential forecast is multiplied by a factor to predict the number of
school-aged children that will come from the projected number of units. To derive this
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-15
pupil generation factor, the methodology involves using custom Census data prepared
specifically for Watson by Statistics Canada. The Census data provides information
with respect to the number of pre-school and school-aged children that are currently
living in certain types and ages of dwelling units. For example, the data is able to
provide the number of children aged between 4-13 years that live in single-family homes
that are between 1-5 years old for any Census tract in the study area.
Pupil yields were derived for both the elementary and secondary panels for low-,
medium- and high-density housing types for each municipality/review area in the
Board’s jurisdiction. The pupil yields and trends can vary significantly from area to area
in the Board’s jurisdiction. In this way, factors are derived and applied to the
appropriate growth forecast to get a forecast of school-aged children from new
development. This new development forecast must then be adjusted to reflect only the
enrolment for the subject Board. Using historical apportionment and population
participation rates, the enrolment forecast is revised to capture the appropriate share for
the Board. For the PDSB, the total yields for the elementary panel range between 0.18
(City of Mississauga) and 0.40 (City of Brampton) (Table 4.4). On the secondary panel,
total yields for the secondary panel range from 0.04 (City of Mississauga) to 0.16 (Town
of Caledon).
Figure 1 depicts a flow chart outlining the process of projecting enrolment from
new development.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-16
Table 4.4 PDSB Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form E Growth-Related Pupils – Elementary and Secondary Panel (Region of Peel)
Municipality Dwelling Unit Type
Elementary Pupil Yield
Municipality Dwelling Unit Type
Secondary Pupil Yield
City of Mississauga
Low Density 0.39
City of Mississauga
Low Density 0.13
Medium Density 0.34 Medium Density 0.09
High Density 0.12 High Density 0.03
Total 0.18 Total 0.04
City of Brampton
Low Density 0.48
City of Brampton
Low Density 0.11
Medium Density 0.45 Medium Density 0.09
High Density 0.15 High Density 0.03
Total 0.40 Total 0.09
Town of Caledon
Low Density 0.23
Town of Caledon
Low Density 0.20
Medium Density 0.17 Medium Density 0.11
High Density 0.06 High Density 0.03
Total 0.20 Total 0.16
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-17
Figure 1: Enrolment Expected from New Development
Council-Approved
Growth Forecast
School-Age Population
Generation Factors
Projected School-Age
Population
(elementary and
secondary)
Adjusted for Board
Share with
Coterminous Board
Adjusted for Population
Participation
(i.e. those not attending
Public Schools)
Board-Specific
Enrolment Expected
from New Development
Multiplied by
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-18
Is the EDC Forecast Reasonable in Comparison to Other School-Aged Forecasts?
The aforementioned methodology describes the process in which enrolment projections
are derived; however, before the projections can be finalized there is one final step.
The projections are compared with an accepted school-age forecast for the Board’s
jurisdiction to determine the reasonableness of the projections. The Board’s projections
are built back up to a total school-aged population forecast using assumptions on
apportionment and participation rates.
The projections are compared to the most recent available forecasts in the Board’s
jurisdiction. These can include Ministry of Finance Population projections, Statistics
Canada Population projections, Official Plan projections, etc. If the enrolment
projections and the population forecast have similar long-term trends, further adjustment
is unlikely. However, should there be significant differences between the two forecasts,
adjustments may be made to the enrolment projections to ensure consistency with the
population forecast.
This final adjustment ensures that the projected enrolment for the Board maintain
similar long-term trends and assumptions consistent with other
governments/agencies in the Board’s jurisdiction.
For the purposes of the EDC projections, various population forecasts were used to
cross-check the numbers including Ministry of Finance Population Projections and the
Region of Peel GMS (2017).
4.3 Summary of Projected Enrolment
The total EDC enrolment projections for the Region of Peel, indicate that by the end of
the forecast period (2033/34), the PDSB can expect total elementary enrolment of
137,643, compared to the 2019/20 enrolment of 115,630. This results in an increase of
22,013 elementary pupils or 19.04%. On the secondary panel, enrolment is expected to
increase over the projected term. Enrolment is expected to grow from 41,682 in
2019/20 to 46,455 at the end of the forecast term, for a total increase of 4,773 pupils or
11.5%. A summary of the projected enrolment for the Board, by review area and panel
can be found on the following page.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-19
Summary of Elementary Projected Enrolment:
PDSB Elementary Review Areas
Review Year 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Review Year 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15
Area 2019/20 2023/24 2028/29 2033/34 Area 2019/20 2023/24 2028/29 2033/34
ERA01 2,976 3,067 3,328 3,505 ERA17 2,725 2,705 2,724 2,851
ERA02 1,874 2,020 2,322 2,611 ERA18 7,128 7,020 7,106 7,454
ERA03 2,874 2,661 2,571 2,783 ERA19 7,890 7,689 7,632 7,733
ERA04a 4,760 4,756 4,899 5,282 ERA20 6,573 6,529 6,749 7,092
ERA04b 4,047 4,567 5,304 5,911 ERA21a 197 680 1,564 2,956
ERA05 4,030 3,981 3,990 4,209 ERA21b 3,796 5,047 6,383 6,839
ERA06 4,335 3,953 3,892 4,153 ERA22 6,344 6,286 6,248 6,287
ERA07 3,431 3,364 3,471 3,695 ERA23 2,516 2,535 2,576 2,778
ERA08 3,475 3,205 3,165 3,209 ERA24a 9,846 9,431 9,083 9,229
ERA09 3,926 4,135 4,329 4,569 ERA24b 683 1,379 2,224 2,776
ERA10 2,804 2,506 2,538 2,669 ERA25a 2,598 2,754 2,803 2,849
ERA11 3,296 3,166 3,165 3,422 ERA25b 0 704 1,672 2,068
ERA12 2,476 2,315 2,389 2,558 ERA26a 1,725 2,171 2,857 3,467
ERA13 3,581 3,373 3,300 3,332 ERA26b 1,521 1,507 1,540 1,628
ERA14 1,195 1,833 2,668 2,964 ERA27 1,888 1,914 2,235 2,742
ERA15 5,366 5,953 6,958 7,265 ERA28 1,044 1,117 1,211 1,303
ERA16 4,710 4,785 5,066 5,454 Total 115,630 119,108 127,962 137,643
*Note: May not add to jurisdiction total due to rounding.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 4-20
Summary of Secondary Projected Enrolment:
PDSB Secondary Review Areas
Review Year 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15
Area 2019/20 2023/24 2028/29 2033/34
SRA01 9,390 9,847 10,114 10,323
SRA02 8,571 8,565 7,562 7,375
SRA03 2,482 2,638 2,451 2,264
SRA04 3,170 4,053 4,985 5,681
SRA05 5,042 5,572 5,708 5,781
SRA06 2,739 2,714 2,612 2,529
SRA07 2,963 2,959 2,826 2,781
SRA08 3,854 4,504 4,799 4,396
SRA09 1,989 2,338 2,614 3,141
SRA10 1,482 1,674 1,795 2,184
Total 41,682 44,864 45,466 46,455
*Note: May not add to jurisdiction total due to rounding.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board March 29, 2019
Chapter 5 Education Development Charge Calculation
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 5-1
5. Education Development Charge Calculation
Once eligibility has been determined, the charge is calculated using the aforementioned
forecasts and methodologies. The calculation is dependent on the growth/enrolment
forecasts to project need, the valuation of land and services to assign a cost to that
need and the residential and non-residential forecast to provide a quotient to determine
the final quantum of the charge. O.Reg. 20/98 s.7 provides the basis under which the
EDC is determined. The following section will explain and highlight the specific
calculation components of the EDC.
5.1 The Projections
The residential dwelling unit forecasts, as well as the non-residential GFA forecasts that
were used in the EDC analysis, are explained in detail in Chapter 4 and outlined below.
Residential Unit Forecast
Region of Peel 2019/20-2033/34
TOTAL PROJECTED UNITS 111,166
TOTAL NET NEW UNITS 109,499
Non –Residential Forecast
Region of Peel 2019/20-2033/34
TOTAL PROJECTED GFA 101,695,000
TOTAL NET NEW GFA 91,735,525
Net Growth-related Pupil Places
The projected Board enrolments, as well as the residential forecasts, determine the net
growth-related pupil places which, in turn, determine the number of EDC eligible sites.
Form E of the EDC Ministry Submission for the Board and each panel is set out below.
This form highlights, by municipality, the net number of units, the Board pupil yields and
the growth-related pupils.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 5-2
Board-wide, the enrolment projections predict 18,555 net growth-related pupils on the
elementary panel and 5,149 on the secondary panel for PDSB.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 5-3
PDSB Education Development Charges Submission 2019 Form E Growth-Related Pupils – Elementary and Secondary Panels
Municipality Dwelling
Unit Type
Net New Units
Elementary Pupil Yield
Elementary Growth-Related Pupils
Municipality Dwelling Unit Type
Net New Units
Elementary Pupil Yield
Elementary Growth-Related Pupils
City of Mississauga
Low 2,986 0.39 1,155
City of Mississauga
Low 2,986 0.13 381
Medium 6,373 0.34 2,156 Medium 6,373 0.09 549
High 30,024 0.12 3,693 High 30,024 0.03 814
Total 39,383 0.18 7,004 Total 39,383 0.04 1,744
City of Brampton
Low 29,818 0.48 14,377
City of Brampton
Low 29,818 0.11 3,260
Medium 10,591 0.45 4,740 Medium 10,591 0.09 901
High 12,932 0.15 1,966 High 12,932 0.03 426
Total 53,341 0.40 21,084 Total 53,341 0.09 4,587
City of Caledon
Low 11,144 0.23 2,574
City of Caledon
Low 11,144 0.20 2,275
Medium 3,733 0.17 631 Medium 3,733 0.11 395
High 1,898 0.06 120 High 1,898 0.03 49
Total 16,775 0.20 3,325 Total 16,775 0.16 2,719
SUBTOTAL: 31,413 SUBTOTAL: 9,050
LESS: Available Pupil Places: 12,858 LESS: Available Pupil Places: 3,901
NET GROWTH RELATED PUPILS: 18,555 NET GROWTH RELATED PUPILS: 5,149
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 5-4
5.2 Net Education Land Costs
The enrolment projections, the Board’s long-term accommodation plans and the EDC
analysis ultimately determine the number of EDC eligible sites which are needed for
new growth-related schools. Form F of the Ministry Submission outlines, by review
area, the 15-year enrolment projections as well as the net growth-related pupil places.
Form G of the Ministry Submission outlines the number of new sites that will be needed,
as well as the number of EDC eligible acres of land that are required for those sites.
O.Reg. 20/98 s.7, specifically paragraphs 4-7, deals with the steps involved in moving
from the site component of the calculation to the financial or costing component of the
calculation. A cost must be attached to the value of the land that needs to be
purchased, as well as the costs to provide services and prepare the land for
construction. In addition, the balance of the existing EDC reserve funds must be
calculated and incorporated into the analysis. Finally, the total eligible revenues,
expenditures and existing deficits or surpluses are cash-flowed over a 15-year period to
determine the final charge.
Section 257.53 (2) of the Act specifically describes what education land costs are:
1. Costs to acquire land or an interest in land, including a leasehold interest, to be
used by the board to provide pupil accommodation;
2. Costs to provide services to the land or otherwise prepare the site so that a
building or buildings may be built on the land to provide pupil accommodation;
3. Costs to prepare and distribute education development charge background
studies;
4. Interest on money borrowed to pay for costs described in paragraphs 1 and 2;
and
5. Costs to undertake studies in connection with an acquisition referred to in
paragraph 1. N.B. – Only the capital component of costs to lease land or to
acquire a leasehold interest is an education land cost.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 5-5
Site Valuation
Paragraph 4 of Section 7 of O.Reg. 20/98 states that, “The board shall estimate the net
education land cost for the school sites required to provide pupil places for the number
of new school pupils estimated under paragraph 3.”
To determine the costs of land acquisition, PDSB retained the appraisal firm of
Cushman & Wakefield. The appraisers were responsible for providing a per acre land
value for each EDC eligible site identified in the analysis. In addition, the appraisers
were asked to provide an annual land escalation factor (for 5 years) to apply to the
current land values.
The following approach to land valuation was undertaken by the appraisers:
In undertaking the appraisals, the two most common approaches to the valuation of development land were utilized and are summarized as follows:
a) the Direct Comparison Approach which involves comparing or contrasting the recent sale, listing or optioned prices of comparable properties to the subject and adjusting for any significant differences between them; and,
b) the Land Residual Approach (or Development Approach) which estimates land value based on determining selling prices of serviced lots and considers infrastructure costs and appropriate returns, rendering a ‘residual’ land value component.
The strengths underlying the Land Residual Approach are that it more accurately reflects the specific development parameters of a site, while its weaknesses relate to the preliminary nature of planning and engineering information available.
The strengths underlying the Direct Comparison Approach are that it more accurately reflects market attitudes to development land, while its weaknesses relate to the specifics of the subject properties, particularly those that are draft plan approved. For all the subject properties, except where noted, both approaches have been utilized (50:50 weighting) – with the exception of medium/high density sites in Mississauga, where the appraisers relied solely on the Direct Comparison Approach.
The effective date of the appraisals is April 2019.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 5-6
The table below sets out the estimated EDC eligible sites that the Board will require in
the 15-year analysis term, their locations and their appraised land value. These values
were calculated in 2019 and do not include escalation, site improvements, land transfer
taxes, HST (net of rebate) or other associated acquisition costs.
Review Area - Site Panel Cost Per Acre
ERA02 Elementary $3,090,000
ERA04B Elementary $3,090,000
ERA04B Elementary $3,090,000
ERA14 Elementary $0*
ERA15 Elementary $0*
ERA15 (Site in ERA21A) Elementary $1,420,000
ERA21a Elementary $1,420,000
ERA21a Elementary $1,420,000
ERA21a Elementary $1,420,000
ERA21a Elementary $1,420,000
ERA21b Elementary $0*
ERA21b Elementary $0*
ERA21b Elementary $0*
ERA21b Elementary $1,420,000
ERA24b Elementary $1,420,000
ERA24b Elementary $1,420,000
ERA24b Elementary $1,420,000
ERA25b Elementary $1,420,000
ERA25b Elementary $1,420,000
ERA25b Elementary $1,420,000
ERA26a Elementary $1,415,000
ERA26a Elementary $1,415,000
ERA27 Elementary $0*
SRA04 Secondary $0*
SRA04 Secondary $1,420,000
SRA09 Secondary $1,415,000
SRA10 Secondary $1,415,000 *Board-owned site
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 5-7
Land Escalation over the Forecast Period
As previously mentioned, the appraiser’s report estimates an annual land escalation
rate to be applied to the appraised acreage values in order to sustain the likely site
acquisition costs over the next 5 years. In arriving at an escalation factor, the
appraisers considered the recent historical general economic conditions at both the
micro- and macro-economic levels. The purchase of school sites by the Board takes
place on a very local level, with Board entering into negotiations with developers on a
site-specific basis.
Having regard for the above, the appraisers concluded an escalation factor of 2.5% for
the Region of Peel for the first year through to the final year are reasonable for the
purposes of projecting the land values over the 5-year by-law period.
Land Development and Servicing Costs
The Education Act includes the “costs to provide services to the land or otherwise
prepare the site so that a building or buildings may be built on the land to provide pupil
accommodation” as an EDC eligible education cost. These costs typically include
services to the lot line of the property, rough grading and compaction of the site and that
the site is cleared of debris. Costs related to studies of land being considered for
acquisition, such as environmental assessments or soil studies, are also considered to
be EDC eligible. In addition, there are certain costs that are typically associated with
the acquisition of sites that are also included in the site development costs analysis.
Costs such as land transfer taxes, and HST (net of rebate) are included in the site
development analysis because, as mentioned previously, the estimated appraised
values of land are exclusive of these costs.
Discussions with stakeholders and the Ministry of Education in past EDC by-law
processes has resulted in a list that includes some of the primary development and
servicing costs that are considered to be EDC eligible:
Agent/commission fees to acquire sites;
Municipal requirements to maintain sites prior to construction;
Appraisal studies, legal fees;
Expropriation costs;
Land transfer taxes/HST (net of rebate).
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 5-8
As mentioned previously, the costs in this analysis are based on historical school board
data from past EDC background studies. A cost of $13,000 per acre for the PDSB was
used in the study. Using a three-year average of the non-residential institutional
construction cost index from Statistics Canada, an escalation factor of 1.6% per annum
was applied to the assumed per acre site preparation costs. Site preparation costs are
escalated to the time of site purchase.
Total Land Costs
The total net education land costs, including the site acquisition costs, the escalation of
land over the term of the by-law (5 years), the site development/servicing costs, as well
as associated financing costs and study costs, are projected to be approximately $454.3
million for the Peel District School Board.
5.3 Reconciliation of the EDC Reserve Fund
For boards with prior or existing EDC by-laws – before the final growth-related net
education land costs can be determined, they must be adjusted by any deficit or surplus
in the existing EDC reserve fund. Any outstanding education development charge
financial obligations that have been incurred by the Board under previous by-laws are
added to the total land costs. If there is a positive balance in the EDC reserve fund this
amount is subtracted from the total land costs and used to defray EDC eligible
expenditures.
Section 7, paragraphs 5-7 of O.Reg. 20/98 describe the process of deriving the final net
education land costs.
“The board shall estimate the balance of the education development charge reserve fund, if any, relating to the area in which the charges are to be imposed. The estimate shall be an estimate of the balance immediately before the day the board intends to have the by-law come into force.”
“The board shall adjust the net education land costs with respect to any balance estimated under paragraph 5. If the balance is positive, the balance shall be subtracted from the cost. If the balance is negative, the balance shall be converted to a positive number and added to the cost.”
“The net education land cost as adjusted, if necessary, under paragraph 6, is the growth related net education land cost.”
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 5-9
The reserve fund analysis summarizes the EDC collections (both actual and estimated)
as well as the EDC costs that have been expended (both actual and estimated) and the
estimated EDC reserve fund balance. It is based on the Ministry of Education Appendix
D1 and D2 Forms that are prepared and submitted to the Ministry by all school boards
with EDC by-laws in place. The balance from the most recent Appendix D1/D2 is used
as the base point. The EDC reserve fund must also include certain estimates
respecting revenues and expenditures to account for the most recent actual balance
and the balance estimated to the new EDC by-law date.
The PDSB’s EDC reserve fund balance for the Region of Peel by-law is an estimated
deficit balance of -$119,576,810.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 5-10
5.4 The Education Development Charge
The total land costs, adjusted by any surplus or deficit in the EDC reserve fund,
determine the total net education land costs for which EDCs may be imposed. The final
steps in the process involve apportioning the land costs between residential and non-
residential, as well as differentiating the charge by development type, if necessary. The
proposed charge in this Background Study is based on a 90% residential charge, with
10% non-residential component; and the EDC is a uniform rate across all types of
development. A range of charges and residential and non-residential rates are
presented in the cashflow analysis later in this chapter. In addition, a differentiated
residential charge is also presented as part of the EDC Forms package contained in
Appendix A.
The final net education land costs that have been apportioned to residential (in this case
90%) are divided over the net new units from the dwelling forecast to determine a final
EDC rate per dwelling unit.
For the Region of Peel, the net education land costs for the residential portion of
PDSB’s by-law are estimated to be $380,641,798 and the number of net new units in
the EDC forecast is projected to be 109,499, resulting in a rate of $3,476 per dwelling
unit.
The net education land costs for the non-residential portion of PDSB’s by-law are
estimated to be $42,293,533 and the non-exempt Board-determined GFA is projected to
be 91,735,525, resulting in a rate of $0.46 per square foot of GFA.
Table outlining the proposed costs and charges are shown below.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 5-11
PDSB – Region of Peel 2019 EDC Calculation of Uniform 90% Residential/10% Non-Residential Charge
Residential Growth-related Net Education Land Costs $380,641,798
Net New Dwelling Units (Form C) 109,499
Uniform Residential EDC per Dwelling Unit $3,476
Non-Res. Growth-related Net Education Land Costs $42,293,533
Net New GFA (Form D) 91,735,525
Uniform Non-Residential EDC per Square Foot $0.46
The Cashflow Analysis
A cashflow analysis was completed, incorporating all eligible EDC expenditures, current
reserve fund balances and land escalation factors, to determine the necessary
revenues that will be collected through the imposition of EDCs. When revenue in any
given year is insufficient to cover the expenditures, interim financing (on a short- or
long-term basis) is assumed. The methodology used for the cashflow analysis is
consistent with accounting practices used by many school boards, municipalities and
financial lenders across the Province.
General Assumptions Used
The cashflow analysis must incorporate certain assumptions respecting interest rates,
terms, escalation, etc. The table below outlines the general assumptions that have
been used for the EDC analysis.
Site Acquisition Escalation Rate Yr.1, Yr.2, Yr.3, Yr.4, Yr.5 – 2.5%
Site Preparation Escalation Rate 1.6% per annum
EDC Reserve Fund Interest Earnings 1.5%
Short Term Debt (term/rate) 5 Years at 4.25%
Long-term Debt (term/rate) 10 Years at 4.25%
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 5-12
Description of Cashflow
The first section of the cashflow deals with revenue – there are two distinct components
to the revenue section of the cashflow:
1. The first component deals with any short- or long-term debt the boards incur.
The total debt issuance for any given year will be identified in Lines 1 or 2 of the
analysis.
2. The second component deals with the actual expected collections through the
imposition of the Education Development Charge incorporating the annual net
new dwelling unit forecast and non-residential forecast (if available). Projected
EDC collections by year can be found on Lines 4, 5 and 6 of the cashflow.
The second section of the cashflow deals with expenditures – the eligible EDC
expenditures incorporate the site acquisition and development costs, study costs and
financing costs for incurred debt.
Site acquisition costs are found on Line 8 of the analysis and are escalated for up
to a 5-year period (term of the by-law).
Site preparation/development costs are found on Line 9 of the cashflow and are
escalated up to the time of site purchase.
Study costs (Line 10) are based on actual and projected board data and are
included for each expected subsequent by-law renewal (every 5 years).
Long- and short-term financing costs (debt carrying costs) are found on Lines 11
and 12 of the cashflow analysis.
The final section of the cashflow provides the projected opening and closing balances of
the EDC reserve fund incorporating any existing deficit or surplus as well as annual
interest earnings on any balance in the account. Total borrowing, debt payments and
outstanding debt can be found in the bottom right portion of the cashflow analysis.
A cashflow for the Board is included as Table 5.1 on the following page.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE 5-13
Table 5.1.A
Peel District School BoardEducation Development Charge 2018 Non-res Res Non-Res
15 Year Cash Flow Analysis Share Rate Rate
0% $3,862 $0.00
5% $3,669 $0.23
Cash Flow Assumptions 10% $3,476 $0.46
A. Reserve Fund Interest Rate 1.50% 15% $3,283 $0.69
B. Borrowing Rate 4.25% 20% $3,090 $0.92
C. Borrowing Term (Years) 10 25% $2,897 $1.15
C. Borrowing Term (Years) 10 40% $2,317 $1.84E. Short Term Debt Term (years) 5
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Projected Revenues
1 Long Term Financing $93,000,000 $16,000,000 $8,500,000 $22,500,000 $21,600,000 $4,000,000 $55,000,000 $17,000,000 $14,000,000 $5,200,000 $2,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
2 Short Term Financing $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
3 Subtotal (1 +2) $93,000,000 $16,000,000 $8,500,000 $22,500,000 $21,600,000 $4,000,000 $55,000,000 $17,000,000 $14,000,000 $5,200,000 $2,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
4 Education Development Charge Revenue (Res) # 3,476 per unit $25,099,343 $25,099,343 $26,259,702 $26,259,702 $26,259,702 $26,259,702 $26,259,702 $26,259,702 $26,259,702 $26,259,702 $26,259,702 $26,259,702 $22,615,365 $22,615,365 $22,615,365
5 Education Development Charge Revenue (Non-Res) # 0.46 per sq.ft $2,819,569 $2,819,569 $2,819,569 $2,819,569 $2,819,569 $2,819,569 $2,819,569 $2,819,569 $2,819,569 $2,819,569 $2,819,569 $2,819,569 $2,819,569 $2,819,569 $2,819,569
6 Subtotal EDC Revenue (4 + 5) $27,918,912 $27,918,912 $29,079,271 $29,079,271 $29,079,271 $29,079,271 $29,079,271 $29,079,271 $29,079,271 $29,079,271 $29,079,271 $29,079,271 $25,434,933 $25,434,933 $25,434,933
7 Total Revenue (3 + 6) 3,862 34,238,285 $120,918,912 $43,918,912 $37,579,271 $51,579,271 $50,679,271 $33,079,271 $84,079,271 $46,079,271 $43,079,271 $34,279,271 $31,979,271 $29,079,271 $25,434,933 $25,434,933 $25,434,9330 33,005,084
Education Development Charge Expenditures
8 Site acquisition costs (Escalation Rates Included) ¹ $0 $32,314,289 $23,870,200 $36,558,018 $32,790,539 $12,852,797 $62,790,086 $18,411,553 $12,852,797 $3,260,869 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
9 Site preparation costs (Escalation Rates Included) ¹ $880,309 $293,610 $214,710 $326,713 $230,606 $112,591 $425,001 $166,487 $118,082 $30,438 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
10 Projected Future Study Costs $0 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000
11 Long Term Debt Costs $0 $11,609,201 $13,606,483 $14,667,539 $17,476,217 $20,172,548 $20,671,868 $27,537,525 $29,659,637 $31,407,259 $32,056,375 $20,809,181 $18,811,899 $17,750,843 $14,942,166
12 Short Term Debt Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
13 Reserve Fund Deficit 119,576,810-
14 Total Expenditures (8 through 12) $880,309 $44,217,100 $37,691,393 $51,552,270 $50,622,362 $33,137,936 $83,886,955 $46,115,565 $42,630,516 $34,823,566 $32,056,375 $20,809,181 $18,811,899 $17,750,843 $15,067,166
Cashflow Analysis:
15 Revenues Minus Expenditures (7 - 14) $120,038,603 -$298,188 -$112,123 $27,000 $56,909 -$58,665 $192,316 -$36,294 $448,755 -$544,295 -$77,105 $8,270,089 $6,623,034 $7,684,090 $10,367,768
16 Opening Balance (previous year's closing balance) -$119,576,810 -$119,576,810 $461,793 $166,059 $54,745 $82,971 $141,978 $84,563 $281,032 $248,409 $707,621 $165,776 $90,001 $8,485,491 $15,335,153 $23,364,532
17 Sub total (15 + 16) 119,576,810- 461,793 163,605 53,936 81,745 139,880 83,313 276,879 244,738 697,164 163,326 88,671 8,360,090 15,108,525 23,019,243 33,732,300
18 Interest Earnings $0 $2,454 $809 $1,226 $2,098 $1,250 $4,153 $3,671 $10,457 $2,450 $1,330 $125,401 $226,628 $345,289 $505,985
19 Closing Balance (17 + 18) -$119,576,810 $461,793 $166,059 $54,745 $82,971 $141,978 $84,563 $281,032 $248,409 $707,621 $165,776 $90,001 $8,485,491 $15,335,153 $23,364,532 $34,238,285
1 Land acquisition costs have been escalated by 2.5% compounded for the term of the bylaw. Long Term Borrowing (Total of Line 3): $259,700,000
Escalation rates for site preparation costs are applied to the date of acquisition and are escalated by 1.6% compounded annually. Total Debt Payments: $324,183,826
05-Jan $127,603,994 Outstanding Debt At End Of Forecast(15 years): $33,005,084
10-Jun $111,145,701 Outstanding Debt Will Be Fully Funded In: 2039
Range of Residential and Non-Residential
Rates
Appendices
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE A-1
Appendix A Education Development Charges Ministry of Education Forms Submission
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE A-2
Appendix A: Education Development Charges Ministry of Education Forms Submission
The Ministry of Education has prepared a set of standard forms that are required to be
part of the EDC Background Study. The forms are used by the Ministry to review the
EDC analysis and are standardized so that information is presented in a consistent
manner for all school boards. The forms for the Board’s EDC analysis are found in this
Appendix. In addition, a description of each form and its purpose can be found below.
FORM A1 AND A2
This form is used to determine whether a school board is eligible to impose EDCs. The
A1 section of the form includes the Board’s approved OTG capacity for each panel, as
well as the projected 5-year enrolment. If the average 5-year projected enrolment is
greater than the Board’s OTG capacity (on either panel), the Board is eligible to impose
EDCs. The A2 section of the form deals with any outstanding EDC financial obligations.
The form highlights any outstanding principal less the existing reserve fund balance. A
positive financial obligation results in a board being eligible to impose future EDCs.
FORM B
Form B outlines the dwelling unit forecast that was used in the EDC analysis. The
forecast is provided by municipality and by year for low-, medium- and high-density
types of development.
FORM C
This form provides the net new dwelling units that are a requirement of the EDC
analysis. Due to certain statutory exemptions (intensification) that were discussed
earlier in this report, a certain percentage of units are removed from the forecast to
determine the “net new units.”
FORM D
This form provides the non-residential forecast of gross floor area in square feet over
the next 15 years. In addition to providing the total projected square footage, this form
also includes an estimate as to the amount of square footage that is exempt from the
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE A-3
forecast. Similar to the residential forecast, because of certain statutory exemptions, an
assumption must be made regarding square footage that is excluded from the final EDC
forecast.
FORM E
Form E provides the total number of growth-related pupils by municipality. The form
includes the net number of units, associated pupil yields and the number of pupils by
density type for both the elementary and secondary panels. The bottom of the form
provides the total number of growth-related pupils less any existing available space to
determine the total “net” growth-related pupils.
FORM F
These forms provide the total “net” growth-related pupil places on a review area basis.
Each form provides a projection of the existing community enrolment by school for each
of the 15 years in the EDC forecast as well as their current OTG capacities. In addition,
the total projected enrolment expected from new development is provided for the total
review area. The total requirements from new development less any available existing
space are the net growth-related pupil places for that review area.
FORM G
Form G highlights the EDC eligible sites that the Board is proposing to purchase. Each
site listing includes information on location, status, proposed school size and site size.
The form also provides information on what percentage of each site is EDC eligible
based on eligible pupil places as a percentage of the total proposed capacity of the
school. In addition to providing site and eligibility information, Form G is noteworthy
because it includes the translation from site requirements to site costs. On a site by site
basis, the form highlights the expected per acre acquisition costs, site development
costs as well as associated escalation and financing costs.
FORM H1 or H2
These forms outline the EDC calculation – Form H1 is used for a uniform EDC rate and
Form H2 is used if the board is proposing a differentiated EDC rate. This EDC analysis
assumes a uniform rate and includes Form H1. This form includes all relevant
information needed to calculate the final EDC. The total education land costs (derived
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE A-4
from Form G) are added to any existing EDC financial obligations (Form A2) and study
costs to determine the growth-related net education land costs for which EDCs may be
collected. These costs must then be allocated to the proposed residential and non-
residential splits. The amount determined to be borne by residential development
(between 60% and 100%) is divided by the total net new units to determine a residential
charge by unit.
Education Development Charge Background Study – Peel District School Board
March 29, 2019 PAGE A-5
PDSB EDC Forms
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form A - Eligibility to Impose an EDC
A.1.1: CAPACITY TRIGGER CALCULATION - ELEMENTARY PANEL
ElementaryElementary Average Average
Panel Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Projected Projected
Board-Wide 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ Enrolment Enrolment
EDC Capacity 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Over Five less
Years Capacity
130,818.0 115,632 116,511 117,420 117,979 119,106 117,330 -13,488
A.1.2: CAPACITY TRIGGER CALCULATION - SECONDARY PANEL
Secondary Average Secondary
Panel Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Projected Projected
Board-Wide 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ Enrolment Enrolment
EDC Capacity 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Over Five less
Years Capacity
46,203.0 41,682 42,650 43,247 44,454 44,864 43,379 -2,824
A.2: EDC FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS
Total Outstanding EDC Financial Obligations (Reserve Fund Balance): 119,576,810-$
Projected Elementary Panel Enrolment
Projected Secondary Panel Enrolment
Peel District School BoardEducation Development Charges Submission 2019Form B - Dwelling Unit Summary
PROJECTION OF GROSS NEW DWELLING UNITS BY MUNICIPALITY
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Total
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/ All
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Units
City of Mississauga
Low Density 160 160 227 227 227 227 227 227 227 227 227 227 132 132 132 2,986
Medium Density 374 374 432 432 432 432 432 432 432 432 432 432 606 606 606 6,886
High Density 1,750 1,750 2,032 2,032 2,032 2,032 2,032 2,032 2,032 2,032 2,032 2,032 2,068 2,068 2,068 30,024
Total 2,284 2,284 2,691 2,691 2,691 2,691 2,691 2,691 2,691 2,691 2,691 2,691 2,806 2,806 2,806 39,896
City of Brampton
Low Density 2,550 2,550 2,164 2,164 2,164 2,164 2,164 2,164 2,164 2,164 2,164 2,164 1,026 1,026 1,026 29,818
Medium Density 988 988 768 768 768 768 768 768 768 768 768 768 596 596 596 11,444
High Density 798 798 872 872 872 872 872 872 872 872 872 872 872 872 872 12,932
Total 4,336 4,336 3,804 3,804 3,804 3,804 3,804 3,804 3,804 3,804 3,804 3,804 2,494 2,494 2,494 54,194
Town of Caledon
Low Density 454 454 828 828 828 828 828 828 828 828 828 828 652 652 652 11,144
Medium Density 190 190 234 234 234 234 234 234 234 234 234 234 438 438 438 4,034
High Density 72 72 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 238 238 238 1,898
Total 716 716 1,166 1,166 1,166 1,166 1,166 1,166 1,166 1,166 1,166 1,166 1,328 1,328 1,328 17,076
Total Jurisdiction
Low Density 3,164 3,164 3,219 3,219 3,219 3,219 3,219 3,219 3,219 3,219 3,219 3,219 1,810 1,810 1,810 43,948
Medium Density 1,552 1,552 1,434 1,434 1,434 1,434 1,434 1,434 1,434 1,434 1,434 1,434 1,640 1,640 1,640 22,364
High Density 2,620 2,620 3,008 3,008 3,008 3,008 3,008 3,008 3,008 3,008 3,008 3,008 3,178 3,178 3,178 44,854
Total 7,336 7,336 7,661 7,661 7,661 7,661 7,661 7,661 7,661 7,661 7,661 7,661 6,628 6,628 6,628 111,166
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form C - Net New Dwelling Units - By-Law Summary
Number of UnitsCity of Mississauga 39,896City of Brampton 54,194Town of Caledon 17,076
Grand Total Gross New Units In By-Law Area 111,166Less: Statutorily Exempt Units In By-Law Area 1,667 Total Net New Units In By-Law Area 109,499
Municipality
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form D - Non-Residential Development
D1 - Non-Residential Charge Based On Gross Floor Area (sq. ft.)
Total Estimated Non-Residential Board-Determined Gross Floor Area
to be Constructed Over 15 Years From Date of By-Law Passage: 101,695,000
Less: Board-Determined Gross Floor Area From Exempt Development: 9,959,475
Net Estimated Board-Determined Gross Floor Area: 91,735,525
Peel District School Board Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019 Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form E - Growth Related Pupils - Elementary Panel Form E - Growth Related Pupils - Secondary Panel
Elementary Secondary
Growth- Growth-
Dwelling Net New Elementary Related Dwelling Net New Secondary RelatedUnit Type Units Pupil Yield Pupils Unit Type Units Pupil Yield Pupils
Low Density 2,986 0.39 1,155 Low Density 2,986 0.13 381
Medium Density 6,373 0.34 2,156 Medium Density 6,373 0.09 549
High Density 30,024 0.12 3,693 High Density 30,024 0.03 814 Total 39,383 0.18 7,004 Total 39,383 0.04 1,744
Low Density 29,818 0.48 14,377 Low Density 29,818 0.11 3,260
Medium Density 10,591 0.45 4,740 Medium Density 10,591 0.09 901
High Density 12,932 0.15 1,966 High Density 12,932 0.03 426 Total 53,341 0.40 21,084 Total 53,341 0.09 4,587
Low Density 11,144 0.23 2,574 Low Density 11,144 0.20 2,275
Medium Density 3,733 0.17 631 Medium Density 3,733 0.11 395
High Density 1,898 0.06 120 High Density 1,898 0.03 49 Total 16,775 0.20 3,325 Total 16,775 0.16 2,719
SUBTOTAL: 31,413 SUBTOTAL: 9,050
LESS: Available Pupil Places: 12,858 LESS: Available Pupil Places: 3,901
NET GROWTH RELATED PUPILS: 18,555 NET GROWTH RELATED PUPILS: 5,149
Town of Caledon
City of Mississauga
Secondary Planning AreaElementary Planning Area
City of Brampton
City of Mississauga
City of Brampton
Town of Caledon
Royal Windsor Drive
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
£¤QEW
Lakeshore Rd
£¤403
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
£¤QEW
Huron
tario
St
Lakeshore Rd
Lakeshore Rd
Dixie
Rd
Dundas St
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Halton
ERA03ERA4a
ERA02
ERA4b
ERA01 - SOUTH OF QEW / WEST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF LAKE / EAST OF PEEL BND
ERA01
±
0 1,500750 M
Lake Ontario
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA01 SOUTH OF QEW / WEST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF LAKE / EAST OF PEEL BND
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Clarkson PS 245 0 105 107 106 107 108 118 113 116 115 114 114 114 114 114 114 114
Green Glade Sr. 366 0 303 329 361 356 338 318 281 289 345 346 342 330 329 328 327 327
Hillcrest MS 516 0 346 389 391 375 331 349 353 363 386 386 386 386 386 386 386 386
Hillside PS 675 0 589 575 567 551 532 510 507 500 506 503 501 497 496 496 495 495
Lorne Park PS 303 0 214 213 203 191 194 187 191 190 184 181 180 180 180 180 180 180
Owenwood PS 130 0 111 109 107 108 105 107 108 105 104 103 103 103 103 103 103 103
Riverside PS 438 0 306 316 320 348 373 368 374 384 389 371 375 370 369 369 369 368
Tecumseh PS 392 0 369 358 358 345 329 320 297 298 289 301 299 292 289 288 288 288
Whiteoaks PS 668 0 555 542 560 562 572 587 587 587 587 587 587 587 587 587 587 587
TOTAL: 3,733.0 0 2,898 2,938 2,972 2,943 2,882 2,863 2,812 2,831 2,903 2,893 2,888 2,860 2,853 2,851 2,849 2,848
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 885
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
38 77 110 143 204 265 308 352 396 440 485 530 572 615 657
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 657
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 885
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
Royal Windsor Drive
£¤QEW
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
£¤QEW
Huron
tario
St
Lakeshore Rd
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Dixie
Rd
£¤427
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤403
Dundas St
Dundas St
Huron
tario
StToronto
ERA4a
ERA05
ERA01
ERA4b
ERA03
ERA02 - SOUTH OF QEW / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF LAKE /EAST OF CREDIT RIVER
ERA02
±
0 1,500750 M
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA02 SOUTH OF QEW / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF LAKE /EAST OF CREDIT RIVER
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Allan A Martin Sr. 538 0 497 521 515 490 512 499 549 519 553 523 534 513 493 497 503 512
Forest Avenue PS 199 0 208 200 187 180 180 172 167 164 162 159 159 159 159 159 159 159
Janet I. McDougald PS 552 0 450 454 448 455 442 443 431 429 422 421 421 420 420 420 420 420
Kenollie PS 245 0 197 199 195 191 185 175 170 167 165 164 164 164 164 164 164 164
Mineola PS 429 0 365 360 369 372 371 372 371 370 364 364 364 364 364 364 364 364
Queen Elizabeth Sr. 262 0 336 305 313 344 314 321 322 288 306 324 317 306 306 306 308 310
Students Holding at Queen Elizabeth Sr. Returned To ERA4a 202- 202- 202- 202- 202- 202- 202- 202- 202- 202- 202- 202- 202- 202- 202-
TOTAL: 2,225.0 0 2,053 1,838 1,826 1,830 1,803 1,780 1,808 1,734 1,769 1,754 1,757 1,725 1,703 1,709 1,716 1,727
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 498
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
37 74 118 163 240 318 378 439 502 565 618 670 742 813 884
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 884
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 498
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 386
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
Royal Windsor Drive
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
£¤QEW
Lakeshore Rd
£¤403Er
in Mi
lls Pk
wy£¤QEW
Huron
tario
St
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤403
Dundas St
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Halton
ERA01
ERA4a
ERA07
ERA4b
ERA06ERA08
ERA09ERA11
ERA02
ERA03 - SOUTH OF 403 / WEST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF QEW
ERA03
±
0 1,500750 M
Peel District School BoardEducation Development Charges Submission 2019Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA03 SOUTH OF 403 / WEST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF QEW
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Brookmede PS 436 0 365 343 335 331 330 322 319 320 325 330 335 341 348 355 362 369
Erin Mills Middle 522 0 440 482 499 502 473 469 483 489 464 434 416 409 410 416 422 427
Garthwood Park PS 473 0 371 360 349 331 318 304 295 290 289 292 298 303 309 315 321 328
Homelands Sr. 456 0 496 456 460 450 453 417 409 412 401 384 362 356 357 358 361 365
Oakridge PS 202 0 99 97 87 84 79 78 74 74 74 75 76 78 79 81 82 84
Sawmill Valley PS 436 0 406 405 387 391 396 388 374 368 363 364 366 367 368 368 368 368
Sheridan Park PS 593 0 453 464 463 446 442 437 438 426 427 428 432 436 442 450 459 468
Thorn Lodge PS 461 0 277 264 234 226 220 213 201 198 195 197 200 204 208 212 216 221
Elm Drive PS 412 0 196 224 273 275 275 283 287 289 294 294 304 296 298 298 299 299
Students Holding At Elm Drive Returned To ERA04B 224- 273- 275- 275- 283- 287- 289- 294- 294- 304- 296- 298- 298- 299- 299-
TOTAL: 3,991.0 0 3,103 2,871 2,814 2,761 2,711 2,628 2,595 2,577 2,538 2,505 2,486 2,494 2,521 2,555 2,591 2,630
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 1,361
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 152019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
2 5 13 21 34 46 56 66 75 85 96 107 122 138 153
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 153
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 1361
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
Royal Windsor Drive
£¤QEW
£¤403
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
£¤QEW
Huron
tario
St
Lakeshore Rd
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Dixie
Rd
£¤427
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤403
Dundas St
Dundas St
Huron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Derry Rd
ERA03
ERA05
ERA02
ERA4b
ERA01
ERA09
ERA07ERA08
ERA11
ERA04a - SOUTH OF 403 / WEST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF QEW - a
ERA04a
±
0 1,500750 M
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA04a SOUTH OF 403 / EAST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF QEW / WEST OF CAWTHRA RD - a
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Camilla Sr. 655 0 694 707 688 689 694 697 696 693 694 695 695 694 694 694 694 694
Cashmere Avenue PS 461 0 405 416 402 389 395 386 395 402 397 393 395 398 402 405 409 413
Clifton PS 468 0 341 345 353 357 346 342 345 343 342 344 346 349 352 356 359 363
Corsair PS 879 0 729 720 730 730 726 726 726 726 726 726 726 726 726 726 726 726
Ellengale PS 268 0 339 328 321 317 316 325 312 307 310 308 310 312 315 317 321 324
Floradale PS 711 0 667 676 673 668 674 667 674 678 681 682 686 691 697 703 710 717
Hawthorn PS 153 0 205 198 204 195 190 189 195 193 194 191 195 195 197 198 200 202
McBride Avenue PS 539 0 409 397 380 379 386 371 375 372 370 370 372 375 378 382 386 389
Munden Park PS 433 0 361 355 354 353 354 356 354 353 354 356 359 362 365 369 373 376
Queenston Drive PS 597 0 502 525 524 509 509 515 515 530 522 511 510 507 510 513 518 522
Springfield PS 409 0 435 434 438 419 411 410 407 420 412 410 412 415 419 423 427 431
The Woodlands 309 0 193 210 225 234 219 214 212 188 200 214 203 197 196 197 198 199
Holding Students In From ERA02 (Queen Elizabeth Sr.) 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202
Holding Students Returned To ERA4b (multiple schools) -776 -776 -776 -776 -776 -776 -776 -776 -776 -776 -776 -776 -776 -776 -776
TOTAL: 5,882.0 0 5,280 4,736 4,719 4,666 4,647 4,625 4,631 4,630 4,629 4,626 4,634 4,648 4,676 4,710 4,746 4,784
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 1,098
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
25 50 77 104 131 158 186 212 239 265 293 321 380 439 498
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 498
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 1,098
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
£¤QEW
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
£¤QEW
Huron
tario
St
Lakeshore Rd
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Dixie
Rd
£¤427
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
Dundas St
Dundas StHu
rontar
io St
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Toronto
Toronto
Toronto
ERA05
ERA4a
ERA09
ERA03
ERA08
ERA02
ERA07ERA11
ERA13
ERA01
ERA04b - SOUTH OF 403 / EAST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF QEW / WEST OF CAWTHRA RD - b
ERA04b
±
0 1,500750 M
Peel District School BoardEducation Development Charges Submission 2019Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA04b SOUTH OF 403 / EAST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF QEW / WEST OF CAWTHRA RD - b
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Briarwood PS 522 0 491 473 464 454 446 439 431 438 438 438 437 436 437 437 437 437
Chris Hadfield PS 672 0 600 596 593 604 605 604 611 624 631 635 638 639 640 640 640 640
Fairview PS 605 0 562 569 583 570 595 595 605 596 596 592 595 596 597 597 597 597
Silver Creek PS 271 0 273 266 261 256 259 259 251 248 251 252 253 254 254 254 254 254
Thornwood PS 579 0 544 555 557 545 536 527 536 533 530 526 533 539 544 548 549 549
The Valleys Sr 536 0 490 479 496 501 497 488 475 467 458 458 452 447 437 441 445 452
Holding Students In From ERA4b (multiple schools) 776 776 776 776 776 776 776 776 776 776 776 776 776 776 776
Holding Students In From ERA03 (Elm Drive) 224 273 275 275 283 287 289 294 294 304 296 298 298 299 299
TOTAL: 3,185.0 0 2,960 3,939 4,003 3,982 3,989 3,971 3,971 3,971 3,974 3,973 3,988 3,984 3,984 3,992 3,998 4,005
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: -
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 152019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
108 217 320 424 597 770 907 1043 1179 1316 1466 1616 1712 1809 1906
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 1906
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 0
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 1906
NOTES
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
15 Year Projections
£¤QEW
Huron
tario
St
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Dixie
Rd
£¤427
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤407
Dundas St
Dundas StDix
ie Rd
Huron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Queen St
Derry Rd
Toronto
ERA09
ERA4a
ERA13
ERA4b
ERA02
ERA18
ERA08
ERA11
ERA12
ERA03
ERA01
ERA05 - SOUTH OF 401 /WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF QEW /EAST OF CAWTHRA RD
ERA05
±
0 2,0001,000 M
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA05 SOUTH OF 401 /WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF QEW /EAST OF CAWTHRA RD
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Brian W. Fleming PS 813 0 500 478 462 444 432 412 405 403 405 405 405 405 404 404 404 404
Burnhamthorpe PS 504 0 628 616 598 602 609 591 591 590 590 590 590 590 590 590 590 590
Dixie PS 507 0 322 323 328 338 338 338 345 341 341 339 338 337 337 337 337 337
Forest Glen PS 539 0 500 485 485 469 473 473 475 471 470 467 465 464 464 464 464 464
Glenhaven Sr PS 559 0 481 470 462 473 475 474 471 471 473 473 472 472 472 472 472 472
Silverthorn PS 401 0 296 293 290 290 286 281 277 277 274 273 272 271 271 271 271 271
Tomken Road Middle 947 0 1,062 1,059 1,058 1,056 1,057 1,057 1,057 1,057 1,057 1,057 1,057 1,057 1,057 1,057 1,057 1,057
Westacres PS 248 0 292 297 310 313 309 311 306 314 308 302 298 299 305 298 295 295
TOTAL: 4,518.0 0 4,081 4,021 3,992 3,984 3,978 3,937 3,927 3,924 3,917 3,905 3,898 3,896 3,900 3,893 3,890 3,890
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 628
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
8 16 26 35 44 54 63 72 82 91 103 114 182 251 319
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 319
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 628
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
£¤403
Britannia Rd
Royal Windsor Drive
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
£¤QEW
Lakeshore Rd
£¤403
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤403
£¤401
£¤407
Dundas St
Huron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
dWins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407
Halton
ERA11
ERA03ERA4a
ERA08
ERA07
ERA10
ERA12
ERA09
ERA4b
ERA06 - SOUTH OF BRITANNIA RD / WEST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL / NORTH OF 403/ EAST OF PEEL BND
ERA06
±
0 2,0001,000 M
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA06 SOUTH OF BRITANNIA RD / WEST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL / NORTH OF 403/ EAST OF PEEL BND
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Artesian Drive PS 698 0 600 557 517 507 484 477 480 484 489 493 498 506 514 521 528 533
Churchill Meadows PS 651 0 626 601 565 565 541 551 554 559 562 568 576 586 596 604 611 616
Erin Centre Middle 766 0 831 846 860 836 777 718 657 639 642 659 643 630 628 629 634 643
McKinnon PS 672 0 563 538 503 478 464 465 463 463 466 471 478 486 494 501 506 510
Oscar Peterson PS 832 0 845 811 797 770 763 762 772 757 748 752 760 771 783 796 807 816
Ruth Thompson Middle 799 0 957 969 998 980 967 894 808 780 736 750 749 750 749 752 761 772
TOTAL: 4,418.0 0 4,422 4,321 4,239 4,135 3,995 3,867 3,734 3,681 3,642 3,691 3,704 3,728 3,764 3,804 3,847 3,890
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 528
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
14 29 48 67 86 106 127 147 167 188 208 227 239 251 263
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 263
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 528
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
£¤403
Britannia Rd
Royal Windsor Drive
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
£¤QEW
£¤403
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
Dundas St
Huron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
dWins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407
Halton
ERA11
ERA12
ERA03
ERA09
ERA4a
ERA08
ERA10
ERA06
ERA4b
ERA18
ERA07 - SOUTH OF BRITANNIA RD / WEST OF CREDIT RIVER & RAILWAY / NORTH OF 403 / EAST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL
ERA07
±
0 2,0001,000 M
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA07 SOUTH OF BRITANNIA RD / WEST OF CREDIT RIVER & RAILWAY / NORTH OF 403 / EAST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Castlebridge PS 536 0 540 533 508 509 497 488 458 457 452 455 460 466 474 483 493 503
Credit Valley PS 655 0 638 628 602 578 541 512 494 485 472 478 483 490 499 508 519 529
Middlebury PS 557 0 573 588 588 600 615 635 643 640 635 629 623 616 610 610 610 610
Thomas Street Middle 755 0 940 913 944 930 917 879 899 871 877 837 827 801 803 798 794 794
Vista Heights PS 780 0 776 739 715 673 674 676 676 678 680 682 685 687 690 693 696 698
TOTAL: 3,283.0 0.0 3,467 3,400 3,357 3,290 3,243 3,189 3,170 3,131 3,115 3,081 3,078 3,061 3,076 3,092 3,111 3,134
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 149
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
31 63 93 123 174 225 266 308 350 393 437 480 507 534 561
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 561
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 149
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 412
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
£¤403
Britannia Rd
Royal Windsor Drive
£¤QEW
£¤403
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
£¤QEW
Huron
tario
St
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
Dundas St
Dundas St
Dixie
Rd
Huron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407
Halton
ERA11
ERA09
ERA05
ERA03
ERA12
ERA18
ERA4a
ERA4b
ERA07
ERA10
ERA06
ERA13
ERA08 - SOUTH OF 401 / WEST OF HURONTARIO & MAVIS / NORTH OF 403 / EAST OF CREDIT RIV & RAIL
ERA08
±
0 2,0001,000 M
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA08 SOUTH OF 401 / WEST OF HURONTARIO & MAVIS / NORTH OF 403 / EAST OF CREDIT RIV & RAIL
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Edenrose PS 747 0 691 676 709 728 765 745 744 744 743 743 743 743 743 743 743 743
Fallingbrook Middle 273 0 547 561 561 537 460 458 454 469 457 454 462 466 467 466 466 465
Hazel McCallion Sr. 671 0 734 728 728 696 659 582 575 542 538 512 511 521 517 513 511 510
Sherwood Mills PS 675 0 612 558 518 497 487 497 493 501 506 507 506 505 504 504 504 504
Whitehorn PS 744 0 697 659 625 606 590 598 585 582 585 583 581 580 580 579 579 579
Willow Way PS 407 0 287 267 258 256 248 242 235 236 237 236 236 235 235 235 235 235
TOTAL: 3,517.0 0 3,568 3,450 3,397 3,319 3,209 3,123 3,087 3,073 3,068 3,035 3,039 3,051 3,047 3,042 3,039 3,038
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 479
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
25 49 60 71 82 89 97 107 117 127 137 148 156 163 171
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 171
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 479
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
£¤403
Britannia Rd
£¤QEW
Huron
tario
St
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Dixie
Rd
£¤427
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dundas St
Dundas StDix
ie Rd
Huron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
£¤407
Toronto
ERA05
ERA13ERA18
ERA12
ERA11
ERA08
ERA4a
ERA4b
ERA03
ERA07
ERA14
ERA09 - SOUTH OF BRITANNIA & 401 / WEST OF TOMKEN RD / NORTH OF 403 / EAST OF MAVINS
ERA09
±
0 2,0001,000 M
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA09 SOUTH OF BRITANNIA & 401 / WEST OF TOMKEN RD / NORTH OF 403 / EAST OF MAVINS
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Barondale PS 444 0 527 513 527 526 521 513 503 502 497 497 499 502 506 511 516 521
Bristol Road Middle 601 0 632 667 641 657 681 717 743 745 767 756 744 734 727 726 727 731
Champlain Trail PS 709 0 650 664 661 672 677 682 656 657 655 656 658 662 668 674 681 688
Cooksville Creek PS 580 0 442 453 474 488 502 517 520 524 524 524 524 524 524 524 524 524
Fairwind Sr. 671 0 623 609 562 562 556 548 594 596 610 581 583 580 577 577 577 580
Huntington Ridge PS 624 0 496 474 461 454 441 433 419 417 417 418 420 423 426 430 435 439
Nahani Way PS 614 0 498 528 554 566 563 579 578 570 569 568 570 573 578 584 589 595
TOTAL: 4,243.0 0 3,868 3,908 3,880 3,925 3,940 3,989 4,013 4,010 4,039 4,000 3,998 3,998 4,006 4,025 4,049 4,078
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 165
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
18 36 73 110 146 184 221 258 295 331 369 406 434 463 491
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 491
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 165
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 326
NOTES
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
15 Year Projections
£¤403
Britannia Rd
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
£¤403
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤407
Dixie
Rd
Huron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
dWins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407
Halton
ERA11
ERA12
ERA08
ERA14
ERA07ERA06
ERA09
ERA17
ERA16
ERA4a ERA4b
ERA15
ERA10 - SOUTH OF RAILWAY / WEST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL / NORTH OF BRITANNIA RD / EAST OF PEEL BND
ERA10
±
0 2,0001,000 M
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA10 SOUTH OF RAILWAY / WEST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL / NORTH OF BRITANNIA RD / EAST OF PEEL BND
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Kindree PS 641 0 448 429 417 398 372 361 356 350 345 345 345 345 345 345 345 345
Lisgar Middle 577 0 677 639 578 532 516 514 472 439 400 390 384 385 390 390 390 390
Miller's Grove PS 309 0 223 209 199 191 188 176 173 169 167 167 167 167 167 167 167 167
Osprey Woods PS 540 0 513 476 454 427 412 392 400 401 405 411 411 411 411 411 411 411
Plum Tree Park PS 833 0 773 742 707 673 667 640 623 623 623 623 623 623 623 623 623 623
Trelawny PS 389 0 313 293 275 270 267 259 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253
TOTAL: 3,289.0 0 2,947 2,788 2,629 2,491 2,422 2,341 2,277 2,234 2,194 2,190 2,184 2,184 2,190 2,190 2,190 2,190
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 1,099
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
16 32 76 120 165 201 237 276 315 354 395 435 450 465 480
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 480
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 1099
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
38,647 38,209 37,828 37,326 36,819 36,313 36,024 35,796 35,790 35,653 35,654 35,628 35,721 35,862 36,027 36,213
323 646 1013 1380 1903 2417 2846 3281 3718 4156 4606 5055 5498 5941 6383
38,647 38,532 38,475 38,339 38,199 38,215 38,440 38,642 39,071 39,370 39,810 40,234 40,776 41,360 41,967 42,596
15 Year Projections
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
£¤403
Britannia Rd
Royal Windsor Drive
£¤QEW
£¤403
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Huron
tario
St
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
Dundas St
Dixie
Rd
Huron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
dWins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407Halton
ERA12
ERA09
ERA18
ERA08
ERA07
ERA10
ERA06
ERA4b
ERA03
ERA05
ERA4a
ERA14ERA17
ERA19
ERA11 - SOUTH OF RAIL & 401 / WEST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF BRITANNIA RD / EAST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL
ERA11
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA11 SOUTH OF RAIL & 401 / WEST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF BRITANNIA RD / EAST OF WINSTON CHURCHILL
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Britannia PS 854 0 580 570 552 532 513 517 502 509 508 514 519 527 536 546 557 568
Dolphin Sr. 555 0 597 611 545 556 515 493 447 457 465 467 458 452 451 451 452 454
Edenwood Middle 504 0 511 519 562 580 544 520 524 504 493 489 478 469 471 471 472 476
Maple Wood PS 176 0 129 125 123 119 118 118 122 120 121 120 122 123 125 128 130 133
Plowman's Park PS 405 0 282 289 280 270 260 261 263 264 257 255 257 261 265 270 275 281
Ray Underhill PS 350 0 264 258 269 272 294 313 311 301 298 300 303 307 313 319 325 332
Settler's Green PS 501 0 489 490 474 471 461 452 442 433 443 447 455 461 468 477 486 496
Shelter Bay PS 484 0 410 422 417 408 417 428 434 436 432 431 435 441 448 456 464 474
TOTAL: 3,829.0 0 3,262 3,284 3,222 3,210 3,121 3,102 3,045 3,024 3,016 3,024 3,028 3,041 3,078 3,117 3,163 3,212
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 617
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
12 24 37 51 64 78 92 107 122 137 152 168 182 196 211
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 211
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 617
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
£¤403
Britannia Rd
£¤QEW
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dundas St
Dixie
Rd
Huron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
dWins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407
Bovaird Dr
HaltonERA18
ERA11
ERA09
ERA14
ERA10
ERA08ERA07
ERA16
ERA17
ERA06
ERA15
ERA19
ERA05
ERA12 - SOUTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / WEST OF HURONTARIO / NORTH OF 401 / EAST OF PEEL BND
ERA12
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA12 SOUTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / WEST OF HURONTARIO / NORTH OF 401 / EAST OF PEEL BND
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
David Leeder Middle 896 0 910 937 911 908 828 788 780 782 763 752 748 750 751 754 759 765
Derry West Village PS 625 0 538 501 497 493 496 503 508 506 507 510 513 518 522 528 533 538
Levi Creek PS 611 0 565 568 564 551 552 546 544 541 542 545 549 554 559 564 570 576
Meadowvale Village PS 623 0 499 464 426 428 422 408 398 403 409 411 414 418 421 426 430 434
TOTAL: 2,755.0 0 2,512 2,469 2,398 2,379 2,298 2,245 2,230 2,233 2,221 2,219 2,224 2,239 2,254 2,271 2,291 2,313
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 442
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
6 13 32 51 70 89 108 127 146 165 183 202 216 231 245
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 245
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 442
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
£¤427
£¤410
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dundas St
Dixie
RdHuron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Toronto
York
ERA18
ERA19
ERA20
ERA09
ERA05
ERA12
ERA16
ERA17
ERA11
ERA13 - SOUTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / WEST OF EPPL BND / NORTH OF 401 / EAST OF HURONTARIO
ERA13
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA13 SOUTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / WEST OF EPPL BND / NORTH OF 401 / EAST OF HURONTARIO
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Brandon Gate PS 540 0 385 380 380 374 369 369 372 366 362 360 359 359 358 358 358 358
Corliss PS 412 0 238 223 208 197 184 167 161 159 159 158 158 157 157 157 157 157
Darcel Avenue Sr. 550 0 513 520 498 476 474 466 464 451 442 428 421 418 415 412 411 410
Dunrankin PS 631 0 473 472 467 465 463 467 453 452 451 449 448 447 447 447 447 447
Lancaster PS 626 0 355 340 328 312 289 289 281 280 281 280 279 279 279 279 279 279
Marvin Heights PS 513 0 372 361 356 359 352 367 360 360 361 359 359 358 358 358 358 358
Morning Star Middle 699 0 599 596 576 588 571 538 528 501 510 499 499 502 500 499 498 498
Ridgewood PS 861 0 708 684 679 666 666 662 662 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661
TOTAL: 4,832.0 0 3,643 3,576 3,493 3,438 3,369 3,325 3,280 3,230 3,227 3,195 3,185 3,182 3,175 3,171 3,168 3,167
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 1,665
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
6 11 24 36 48 61 75 88 102 116 128 140 149 157 165
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 165
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 1665
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
£¤403
Britannia Rd
£¤410
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
dWins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407
Bovaird Dr
Halton
ERA12
ERA18ERA16
ERA15
ERA21a
ERA17
ERA11
ERA10
ERA22ERA21b
ERA23
ERA14 - SOUTHEAST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF PEEL BND
ERA14
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA14 SOUTHEAST OF CREDIT RIVER / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF PEEL BND
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Eldorado PS 778 0 914 877 851 832 796 778 758 747 743 739 741 743 743 743 743 743
Huttonville PS 715 0 212 215 217 204 194 181 175 172 165 165 163 163 163 163 163 163
Whaley's Corners 648 0 281 294 301 311 308 317 328 331 338 335 332 334 333 333 333 333
Holding Students Returned To ERA15 & ERA21a 448- 448- 448- 448- 448- 448- 448- 448- 448- 448- 448- 448- 448- 448- 448-
TOTAL: 2,141.0 0 1,407 939 922 899 850 828 814 803 798 790 788 791 791 791 791 791
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 1350
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
257 514 677 841 1005 1184 1362 1535 1708 1880 2004 2128 2143 2158 2173
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 2173
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 1350
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 823
NOTES
15 Year Projections
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
£¤410
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Huron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Miss
issau
ga R
dWins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
Bovaird Dr Dixie
Rd
Airpo
rt RdHalton
Halton
ERA18
ERA14
ERA16
ERA21a
ERA12
ERA19
ERA22
ERA17
ERA23
ERA21b
ERA24a
ERA13
ERA10 ERA11
ERA15 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF CHINGUACOUSY / NORTHWEST OF CREDIT RIVER
ERA15
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA15 SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF CHINGUACOUSY / NORTHWEST OF CREDIT RIVER
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Churchville PS 804 0 1,012 1,023 1,011 1,012 1,012 992 970 955 948 959 955 960 967 975 984 993
Ingleborough PS 764 0 810 792 753 741 723 695 692 678 672 671 671 674 679 684 690 696
James Potter PS 749 0 577 567 571 562 551 547 539 542 547 550 554 559 564 570 576 581
Lorenville PS 778 0 842 840 822 815 818 818 824 823 811 814 805 806 811 818 825 833
McClure PS 861 0 790 770 708 662 683 700 723 732 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742
Springbrook PS 790 0 790 801 797 800 790 787 790 797 807 810 802 796 802 808 815 823
Holding Students Returned From ERA14 258 258 258 258 258 258 258 258 258 258 258 258 258 258 258
TOTAL: 4,746.0 0 4,821 5,052 4,920 4,850 4,834 4,798 4,796 4,785 4,779 4,799 4,782 4,790 4,819 4,852 4,888 4,926
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 0
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
314 627 803 979 1155 1370 1584 1781 1978 2176 2261 2346 2344 2341 2339
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 2339
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 0
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 2339
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dixie
Rd
Huron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Miss
issau
ga R
dWins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Halton
Halton
ERA18
ERA19
ERA12
ERA14
ERA13
ERA15
ERA21a
ERA22
ERA17
ERA11
ERA23
ERA10
ERA21b
ERA24a
ERA16 - SOUTH OF RAIL / WEST OF HURONTARIO / NORTH OF STEELES / EAST OF CHINGUACOUSY
ERA16
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA16 SOUTH OF RAIL / WEST OF HURONTARIO / NORTH OF STEELES / EAST OF CHINGUACOUSY
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Beatty-Fleming Sr. 583 0 367 367 339 331 334 335 333 334 334 334 334 334 334 334 334 334
Centennial Sr PS 855 0 748 701 664 630 654 690 673 662 635 635 626 623 623 623 623 623
Copeland PS 631 0 469 459 476 457 459 452 452 452 452 452 452 452 452 452 452 452
McHugh PS 303 0 174 160 148 141 135 129 128 130 132 132 132 132 132 132 132 132
Morton Way PS 715 0 563 581 599 599 588 566 577 575 576 576 576 576 576 576 576 576
Northwood PS 614 0 574 569 554 533 530 517 522 514 511 511 511 511 511 511 511 511
Queen Street PS 596 0 477 456 441 433 417 402 402 395 393 393 393 393 393 393 393 393
Ridgeview PS 784 0 677 678 670 676 665 665 655 644 636 636 636 636 636 636 636 636
Sir William Gage PS 689 0 659 650 641 649 646 645 647 646 646 646 646 646 646 646 646 646
TOTAL: 5,770.0 0 4,708 4,622 4,531 4,449 4,428 4,400 4,389 4,351 4,316 4,316 4,306 4,303 4,303 4,303 4,303 4,303
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 1467
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
88 176 246 315 385 461 537 611 686 760 848 937 1008 1080 1151
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 1151
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 1467
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
Britannia Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dundas St
Dixie
Rd
Huron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
dWins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
Halton
ERA18
ERA19
ERA12
ERA14
ERA11
ERA13
ERA16
ERA15
ERA10
ERA21a
ERA09ERA08 ERA05ERA07
ERA22
ERA17 - SOUTH OF STEELES / WEST OF HURONTARIO / NBORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF RAIL
ERA17
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA17 SOUTH OF STEELES / WEST OF HURONTARIO / NBORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF RAIL
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Cherrytree PS 778 0 458 455 442 431 420 406 398 393 390 388 387 386 386 386 386 386
Fletcher's Creek Sr. 680 0 500 539 599 561 566 543 543 512 493 481 480 479 475 473 471 470
Hickory Wood PS 879 0 464 445 432 433 422 422 418 420 422 420 419 418 418 418 418 418
Ray Lawson PS 713 0 545 551 537 524 509 501 498 481 479 477 475 474 473 473 472 472
Roberta Bondar PS 769 0 712 701 687 683 679 680 678 681 675 670 668 667 667 666 666 666
TOTAL: 3,819.0 0 2,679 2,692 2,698 2,632 2,595 2,552 2,534 2,487 2,458 2,435 2,429 2,425 2,419 2,415 2,413 2,412
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 1407
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
33 67 95 124 153 182 211 239 267 295 330 364 389 414 439
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 439
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 1407
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
15 Year Projections
£¤403
Britannia Rd
£¤QEW
Huron
tario
St
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Dixie
Rd
£¤427
Burnhamthorpe Rd£¤403
£¤410£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dundas StDundas St
Dixie
RdHuron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407
Bovaird Dr Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Toronto
Halton
Halton
York
ERA13
ERA19
ERA20
ERA12
ERA14
ERA11
ERA16
ERA21a
ERA15
ERA09
ERA22
ERA10
ERA17
ERA05
ERA24aERA23
ERA08
ERA21b
ERA07
ERA25a
ERA06
ERA25b
ERA18 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / WEST OF 410 / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF HURONTARIO
ERA18
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA18 SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / WEST OF 410 / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF HURONTARIO
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Agnes Taylor PS 617 0 618 599 591 556 559 562 562 562 562 562 562 562 562 562 562 562
Arnott Charlton PS 746 0 566 572 571 575 569 580 580 557 551 549 547 546 546 546 546 546
Glendale PS 369 0 314 307 288 286 274 271 266 265 265 264 264 263 263 263 263 263
Gordon Graydon Sr. 620 0 466 478 485 461 475 463 474 476 495 493 472 463 460 457 455 454
Harold F Loughlin PS 366 0 274 265 256 259 252 251 247 255 255 254 253 253 253 253 253 253
Helen Wilson PS 238 0 239 235 229 229 225 226 213 218 218 217 216 216 216 215 215 215
Homestead PS 1097 0 817 784 785 773 759 754 744 743 743 739 737 736 736 735 735 735
Kingswood Drive PS 816 0 592 578 561 538 544 526 502 516 516 513 512 511 511 511 511 511
Madoc Drive PS 306 0 291 301 304 305 299 297 294 286 282 281 280 279 279 279 279 279
Royal Orchard Middle 629 0 646 654 618 583 548 552 556 535 522 506 508 510 506 503 501 500
Sir John A Macdonald Sr. 646 0 477 463 474 558 532 522 482 487 468 442 459 460 459 457 456 456
Sir Wilfrid Laurier PS 309 0 187 184 183 178 170 178 177 177 177 176 176 175 175 175 175 175
Sir Winston Churchill PS 605 0 350 335 301 287 277 268 266 266 260 260 261 258 257 257 257 257
Westervelts Corners PS 416 0 356 337 333 332 329 323 314 314 314 313 312 311 311 311 311 311
Parkway PS 458 0 440 427 409 395 381 376 354 353 351 349 348 348 347 347 347 347
William G Davis Sr. 493 0 534 533 527 518 519 487 500 462 464 426 433 432 428 426 424 423
TOTAL: 8,731.0 0 7,167 7,051 6,916 6,832 6,712 6,636 6,531 6,472 6,442 6,344 6,339 6,324 6,307 6,296 6,289 6,286
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 2445
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
77 153 230 307 384 459 534 612 690 767 860 953 1024 1096 1168
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 1168
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 2445
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
£¤427
Burnhamthorpe Rd
£¤410
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dundas St
Dixie
RdHuron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
King St
¬«50
York
Toronto
ERA18
ERA13
ERA20
ERA25a
ERA22
ERA23ERA24a
ERA16
ERA12
ERA25b
ERA15
ERA17
ERA24b
ERA21b
ERA26a
ERA14
ERA26bERA26bERA26a
ERA27
ERA11
ERA19 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / WEST OF AIRPORT RD / NORTH OF B & W CITY LIMITS / EAST OF 410
ERA19
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA19 SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / WEST OF AIRPORT RD / NORTH OF B & W CITY LIMITS / EAST OF 410
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Aloma Crescent PS 470 0 389 392 387 392 404 401 401 396 394 394 393 393 393 393 393 393
Balmoral Drive Sr. 693 0 612 662 641 617 569 588 636 660 653 619 613 606 604 602 601 600
Birchbank PS 413 0 364 354 348 352 343 326 307 303 301 300 300 300 300 300 300 300
Clark Boulevard PS 634 0 594 573 590 591 603 610 598 599 595 594 593 593 593 593 593 593
Dorset Drive PS 432 0 502 501 515 521 520 522 528 522 519 518 517 517 517 516 516 516
Earnscliffe Sr. 893 0 779 733 714 706 673 682 680 677 681 672 677 676 674 673 672 671
Eastbourne Drive PS 505 0 358 329 319 307 296 290 272 285 287 286 286 286 286 285 285 285
Fallingdale PS 283 0 209 205 199 192 193 195 196 193 191 191 191 191 190 190 190 190
Folkstone PS 433 0 384 398 409 417 429 434 434 434 433 433 433 433 433 433 433 433
Goldcrest PS 459 0 326 322 322 327 310 310 313 311 310 309 309 308 308 308 308 308
Greenbriar Sr. 482 0 512 529 505 525 504 496 472 473 469 472 462 456 454 453 452 451
Grenoble PS 389 0 353 344 337 330 328 328 334 326 320 319 319 319 318 318 318 318
Hanover PS 337 0 283 281 279 269 264 256 245 249 251 250 250 250 249 249 249 249
Hilldale PS 300 0 233 224 229 240 242 239 237 236 238 238 237 237 237 237 237 237
Jefferson PS 461 0 319 308 302 287 296 288 279 279 281 281 280 280 280 280 280 280
Massey Street PS 521 0 282 254 238 227 224 219 218 220 220 219 218 219 219 219 219 219
Russell D Barber PS 717 0 693 690 687 690 687 672 644 639 635 633 632 632 632 631 631 631
Williams Parkway Sr. 639 0 730 751 732 695 656 665 702 693 660 615 619 618 615 613 613 612
TOTAL: 9,061.0 0 7,922 7,852 7,753 7,685 7,543 7,521 7,494 7,495 7,440 7,343 7,329 7,312 7,301 7,294 7,290 7,288
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 1,773
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
38 75 106 137 168 194 220 247 275 302 333 364 391 418 445
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 445
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 1773
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
£¤410
£¤401
£¤407
Dixie
RdHuron
tario
St
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
King St
¬«50
¬«50
York
Toronto
ERA19
ERA13
ERA18
ERA25a
ERA24aERA23
ERA25b
ERA26b
ERA24b
ERA27ERA26a
ERA20 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF AIRPORT RD
ERA20
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA20 SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF AIRPORT RD
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Beryl Ford PS 772 0 771 674 578 559 526 505 490 481 473 472 473 474 475 477 484 490
Calderstone Middle 629 0 573 564 557 565 561 561 562 561 561 562 561 561 562 561 561 561
Castle Oaks PS 804 0 789 859 925 943 967 984 1,005 1,041 1,047 1,049 1,050 1,052 1,053 1,055 1,056 1,058
Castlemore PS 678 0 625 612 595 568 541 532 515 507 496 503 504 505 506 507 515 521
Claireville PS 739 0 691 681 677 688 684 649 645 650 649 649 649 660 669 676 683 690
Red Willow PS 776 0 648 633 622 613 589 574 568 564 564 563 563 573 581 587 593 599
Sir Isaac Brock PS 850 0 860 831 821 799 788 775 772 771 774 769 777 779 781 784 795 805
Thorndale PS 769 0 577 637 699 679 657 643 635 615 607 606 610 611 613 615 624 632
Walnut Grove PS 861 0 1,013 972 938 942 914 891 878 882 863 847 855 861 862 864 878 889
TOTAL: 6,878.0 0 6,547 6,462 6,412 6,357 6,227 6,113 6,071 6,072 6,034 6,020 6,042 6,076 6,102 6,126 6,190 6,246
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 632
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
110 221 286 351 416 472 528 588 647 707 762 817 827 837 846
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 846
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 632
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 214
NOTES
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Britannia Rd
Mayfield Rd
£¤403
£¤410£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dixie
RdHuron
tario
St
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Miss
issau
ga R
d
King St
Halton
Halton
ERA19
ERA18
ERA14
ERA26b ERA26a
ERA22
ERA23
ERA16
ERA15
ERA24a
ERA26b
ERA21b
ERA13ERA17
ERA24b
ERA12
ERA21a - SOUTH OF MAYFIELD RD / WEST OF MCLAUGHLIN / CREDITVIEW/ NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF PEEL BND - a
ERA21a
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA21a SOUTH OF MAYFIELD RD / WEST OF MCLAUGHLIN / CREDITVIEW/ NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF PEEL BND - a
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Holding Students Returned From ERA14 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190
TOTAL: 0.0 0 0 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 0
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
7 14 173 331 490 649 808 997 1185 1374 1562 1750 2088 2427 2766
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 2766
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 0
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 2766
NOTES
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Mayfield Rd
£¤407
Miss
issau
ga R
dWins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd Ch
ingua
cous
y Rd
Steeles Ave
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
King St
Halton
HaltonERA18
ERA21a
ERA22
ERA23
ERA26bERA26a
ERA15
ERA16
ERA19
ERA14
ERA24a
ERA26b
ERA24b
ERA21b - SOUTH OF MAYFIELD RD / WEST OF MCLAUGHLIN / CREDITVIEW/ NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF PEEL BND - b
ERA21b
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA21b SOUTH OF MAYFIELD RD / WEST OF MCLAUGHLIN / CREDITVIEW/ NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF PEEL BND - b
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Dolson PS 862 0 929 949 959 987 1,001 1,013 1,015 1,007 993 993 980 973 981 982 979 979
Mount Pleasant Village PS 620 0 441 446 451 438 438 441 427 419 405 395 393 392 393 393 392 392
Tribune Drive P.S. 885 0 815 855 878 884 898 910 911 915 915 910 902 900 899 899 898 899
Aylesbury P.S. 873 0 704 724 762 789 825 846 852 874 883 904 926 922 917 917 921 919
Return Students Holding In ERA26B 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438
TOTAL: 3,240.0 0 2,889 3,413 3,489 3,536 3,600 3,649 3,643 3,653 3,633 3,640 3,638 3,625 3,629 3,629 3,629 3,627
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: -
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
383 766 977 1187 1398 1690 1983 2237 2491 2745 2908 3071 3118 3165 3212
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 3212
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 0
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 3212
NOTES
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Existing Schools and Projects
Mayfield Rd
£¤407
Huron
tario
St
Miss
issau
ga R
dWins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd Ch
ingua
cous
y Rd
Steeles Ave
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
King St
Halton
HaltonERA18
ERA21a
ERA23
ERA26bERA26a
ERA21b
ERA15
ERA19
ERA16
ERA24a
ERA14
ERA26b
ERA24b
ERA22 - SOUTH OF WANLESS/MAYFIELD / WEST OF HURONTARIO/RAIL / NORTH OF RAIL / WEST OF CREDITIVIEW
ERA22
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA22 SOUTH OF WANLESS/MAYFIELD / WEST OF HURONTARIO/RAIL / NORTH OF RAIL / WEST OF CREDITIVIEW
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Brisdale PS 1005 0 927 914 899 876 857 843 855 856 862 858 855 854 853 853 853 853
Burnt Elm PS 929 0 784 788 786 786 772 747 739 744 751 748 746 744 744 744 744 744
Cheyne Middle 877 0 843 803 746 748 747 778 778 767 742 739 746 759 753 748 745 744
Edenbrook Hill PS 789 0 708 699 721 716 731 734 721 723 729 726 724 722 722 722 722 722
McCrimmon Middle 891 0 807 829 814 835 844 864 837 795 742 753 770 781 775 770 767 766
Nelson Mandela PS 804 0 730 719 719 723 720 698 689 692 689 686 684 683 683 683 683 683
Rowntree PS 873 0 848 828 839 837 829 833 839 836 836 832 830 828 828 827 827 827
Worthington PS 1010 0 763 748 743 738 726 707 709 720 727 724 722 721 720 720 720 720
TOTAL: 7,178.0 0 6,410 6,329 6,266 6,259 6,226 6,204 6,167 6,132 6,077 6,066 6,077 6,093 6,077 6,066 6,060 6,057
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 1,121
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
15 31 48 65 82 99 115 134 153 171 188 206 214 221 229
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 229
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 1121
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Mayfield Rd
£¤410
Huron
tario
St
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
King St
ERA26b
ERA26a
ERA22
ERA24a
ERA19ERA18
ERA21b
ERA24b
ERA15
ERA16
ERA23 - SOUTH OF B& C CITY LIMITS/WEST OF 410 / NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF HURONTARIO
ERA23
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA23 SOUTH OF B& C CITY LIMITS/WEST OF 410 / NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF HURONTARIO
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Conestoga PS 509 0 436 420 395 374 363 350 348 344 343 347 350 354 357 361 364 368
Esker Lake PS 457 0 339 342 344 337 341 316 317 309 307 310 313 316 319 322 326 329
Robert H Lagerquist Sr. 637 0 645 663 675 680 676 676 679 677 658 631 616 610 617 623 629 635
Somerset Drive PS 557 0 434 433 429 434 435 446 431 437 439 444 448 453 457 462 467 471
Terry Fox PS 593 0 611 615 608 600 587 588 579 575 578 584 590 596 602 608 614 620
TOTAL: 2,753.0 0 2,465 2,472 2,450 2,426 2,402 2,376 2,353 2,342 2,325 2,315 2,317 2,329 2,352 2,376 2,400 2,424
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 329
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
44 88 111 135 160 178 197 217 238 259 288 317 329 342 354
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 354
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 329
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 25
NOTES
94,613 93,488 92,469 91,213 90,250 89,562 89,064 88,747 88,349 88,329 88,347 88,518 88,760 89,092 89,455
1712 3426 4858 6291 7880 9582 11201 12802 14405 16011 17414 18817 19920 21023 22126
96,325 96,914 97,327 97,504 98,130 99,145 100,264 101,549 102,754 104,339 105,761 107,335 108,680 110,115 111,581
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Mayfield Rd
Countryside Dr
£¤410
£¤407
Huron
tario
St
Queen St
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
¬«50
ERA19
ERA25a
ERA23
ERA20
ERA26bERA26a
ERA18
ERA27
ERA24b
ERA22
ERA24a - SOUTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF GOREWAY / NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF 410 - a
ERA24a
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA24a SOUTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF GOREWAY / NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF 410 - a
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Carberry PS 855 0 692 712 709 701 698 694 644 628 617 617 617 617 617 617 617 617
Eagle Plains PS 611 0 550 529 508 493 489 477 476 468 462 454 452 452 452 452 452 452
Fernforest PS 867 0 853 849 847 860 853 837 825 813 803 803 803 803 803 803 803 803
Great Lakes PS 919 0 868 834 824 789 771 767 753 740 720 696 695 696 696 696 696 696
Hewson PS 697 0 594 576 562 519 505 484 470 465 459 459 459 459 459 459 459 459
Larkspur PS 1112 0 865 848 836 820 800 810 791 791 792 792 792 792 792 792 792 792
Lougheed Middle 744 0 759 770 752 736 718 717 746 736 727 672 645 624 624 624 624 624
Mountain Ash PS 730 0 600 629 601 588 566 569 554 548 526 509 509 511 512 512 512 512
Robert J Lee PS 752 0 720 700 691 676 658 641 629 599 602 587 588 587 587 587 587 587
Ross Drive PS 804 0 861 885 914 908 903 889 877 866 850 823 816 811 817 817 817 817
Shaw PS 814 0 628 628 610 602 578 560 555 555 545 542 537 535 537 537 537 537
Springdale PS 867 0 610 570 539 501 462 444 435 428 422 422 422 422 422 422 422 422
Stanley Mills PS 671 0 461 450 442 429 424 428 424 427 427 427 427 427 427 427 427 427
Sunny View Middle 792 0 791 784 790 817 813 786 755 717 715 679 676 672 672 672 672 672
TOTAL: 11,235.0 0 9,852 9,764 9,625 9,440 9,239 9,104 8,934 8,781 8,666 8,482 8,439 8,408 8,417 8,417 8,417 8,417
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 2,818
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
82 165 219 273 327 392 457 519 582 644 696 748 769 791 812
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 812
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 2818
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Mayfield Rd
Countryside Dr
£¤410
£¤407
Huron
tario
St
Queen St
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
King St
¬«50
ERA26b
ERA25a
ERA27
ERA23ERA24a
ERA26a
ERA19ERA20
ERA22
ERA18
ERA24b - SOUTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF GOREWAY / NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF 410 - b
ERA24b
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA24b SOUTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF GOREWAY / NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF 410 - b
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Countryside Village PS 885 0 460 483 505 522 537 542 548 555 558 540 535 533 533 533 533 533
TOTAL: 885.0 0 460 483 505 522 537 542 548 555 558 540 535 533 533 533 533 533
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 352
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
200 400 546 691 836 1012 1188 1355 1522 1689 1859 2029 2100 2171 2242
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 2242
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 352
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 1891
NOTES
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Mayfield Rd
Countryside Dr
£¤410
Queen St
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
King St
¬«50
York
ERA27ERA26b
ERA24a
ERA20
ERA25b
ERA19
ERA24b
ERA23
ERA26a
ERA25a - SOUTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF GOREWAY - a
ERA25a
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA25a SOUTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF GOREWAY - a
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Fairlawn PS 885 0 814 783 775 768 754 731 716 710 698 696 696 696 696 696 696 696
Mount Royal PS 847 0 962 944 931 910 896 876 858 833 822 816 808 801 798 797 796 795
Treeline PS 923 0 755 732 697 684 651 622 611 579 550 527 525 521 519 518 517 517
Vales of Humber #1 658 0
TOTAL: 3,313.0 0 2,531 2,458 2,403 2,362 2,301 2,229 2,184 2,123 2,071 2,040 2,028 2,018 2,014 2,011 2,009 2,009
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 1,304
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
140 281 362 444 525 565 604 661 718 775 825 875 864 852 840
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 840
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 1304
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 0
NOTES
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Mayfield Rd
Countryside DrTh
e Gore
Rd
Bovaird Dr
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
King St
¬«50
¬«50
York
ERA27
ERA25a
ERA20
ERA26b
ERA19
ERA24a
ERA24b
ERA25b - SOUTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF GOREWAY - b
ERA25b
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA25b SOUTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF GOREWAY - b
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
TOTAL: 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 0
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
0 0 235 469 704 939 1174 1340 1506 1672 1838 2004 2025 2046 2068
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 2068
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 0
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 2068
NOTES
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Mayfield Rd
Countryside Dr
£¤410
Huron
tario
St
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Huron
tario
St
King St
Olde Baseline Rd
ERA26b
ERA23
ERA24a
ERA22
ERA21b
ERA24b
ERA21a
ERA26a - MAYFIELD
ERA26a
±
0 21 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA26a MAYFIELD
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
SouthFields Village PS 763 0 1,003 978 947 915 899 887 879 877 884 894 905 930 943 952 957 960
Tony Pontes P.S. 611 0 394 409 419 439 446 461 479 475 491 503 500 500 500 500 500 500
Holding Students Returned From ERA26b 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240
TOTAL: 1,374.0 0 1,397 1,627 1,606 1,594 1,585 1,588 1,598 1,592 1,615 1,637 1,645 1,670 1,683 1,692 1,697 1,700
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 0
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
98 201 323 450 583 703 828 952 1,080 1,213 1,331 1,449 1,555 1,661 1,767
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 1,767
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities -
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 1,767
NOTES
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Mayfield Rd
Huron
tario
St
Countryside Dr
The G
ore R
d
£¤410
£¤407
£¤407
Huron
tario
St
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
The G
ore R
d
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Huron
tario
St
King St
Olde Baseline Rd
King St
¬«50
¬«50
Halton
Wellington
ERA28
ERA27
ERA28
ERA25a
ERA26a
ERA24aERA23
ERA22
ERA21b
ERA21a
ERA24b
ERA25b
ERA20
ERA26b - SOUTH OF OLD BASE LINE RD / WEST OF AIRPORT RD / NORTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS/ EAST OF PEEL BND - b
ERA26b
±
0 42 Km
Peel District School BoardEducation Development Charges Submission 2019Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA26b SOUTH OF OLD BASE LINE RD / WEST OF AIRPORT RD / NORTH OF B&C CITY LIMITS/EAST OF PEEL BND - b
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
James Grieve PS 743 0 665 637 645 648 645 647 650 663 664 649 651 652 651 651 651 651
Herb Campbell PS 671 0 781 768 764 757 732 704 688 677 671 677 689 725 730 739 749 762
Alloa PS 625 0 788 794 802 802 808 818 830 856 861 845 842 843 843 843 843 843
Return Students Holding At Alloa To ERA21B and 26A 678- 678- 678- 678- 678- 678- 678- 678- 678- 678- 678- 678- 678- 678- 678-
TOTAL: 2,039.0 0 2,234 1,520 1,533 1,529 1,507 1,491 1,489 1,518 1,518 1,492 1,505 1,542 1,546 1,555 1,566 1,579
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 460
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 152019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
1 2 7 11 16 21 25 29 32 36 39 43 45 47 50
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 50
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 460
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) -
NOTES
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Existing Schools and Projects
Countryside Dr
The G
ore R
d
Huron
tario
St
Queen St
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
The G
ore R
d
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Huron
tario
St
King St
Olde Baseline Rd
King St
¬«50
¬«50
York
Simcoe
ERA28
ERA26b
ERA26a
ERA25a ERA25bERA24bERA23 ERA23
ERA27 - S OF CAL EAST BND/OLD BASELINE/CASTLEDERG/W OF PEEL BND/ N OF B&C CITY LIMITS/E OF AIRPORT
ERA27
±
0 42 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA27 S OF CAL EAST BND/OLD BASELINE/CASTLEDERG/W OF PEEL BND/N OF B&C CITY LIMITS/E OF AIRPORT
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Allan Drive Middle 643 0 479 443 420 416 371 344 337 344 343 332 319 295 291 288 288 289
Caledon East PS 254 0 259 264 258 247 241 241 244 245 245 236 237 231 231 232 234 236
Ellwood Memorial PS 504 0 382 358 334 318 311 297 295 292 286 285 285 287 289 292 295 298
James Bolton PS 596 0 482 479 454 453 453 438 426 413 395 394 394 396 399 403 407 411
Macville PS 323 0 321 321 297 282 245 230 216 204 217 214 217 207 210 215 219 221
TOTAL: 2,320.0 0 1,923 1,865 1,764 1,716 1,620 1,551 1,518 1,499 1,485 1,461 1,453 1,416 1,420 1,430 1,442 1,454
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 866
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
23 46 152 257 363 463 563 636 709 782 862 943 1,058 1,173 1,288
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 1,288
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 866
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 422
NOTES
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Mayfield Rd
Huron
tario
St
Countryside Dr
The G
ore R
d
£¤410
£¤407
Dixie
Rd
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
The G
ore R
d
Miss
issau
ga R
d Huron
tario
St
King St
Olde Baseline Rd
King St
¬«50
¬«50
Simcoe
Wellington
York
Halton
ERA27ERA26b
ERA28 - S OF PEEL BND / W OF PEEL BND / N OF OLD BASELINE / CAL EAST BND / CASTLEDERG/ WEST OF PEEL BND
ERA28
±
0 63 Km
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form F - Growth Related Pupil Place Requirements
Panel: Elementary Panel
Review Area: ERA28 S OF PEEL BND / W OF PEEL BND / N OF OLD BASELINE / CAL EAST BND / CASTLEDERG/ WEST OF PEEL BND
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Alton PS 245 0 111 118 115 117 119 124 124 116 121 119 120 121 122 123 124 125
Caledon Central PS 521 0 364 353 361 373 358 354 357 377 369 366 362 357 359 361 364 368
Palgrave PS 670 0 396 386 377 360 348 341 334 331 328 323 329 331 333 335 338 341
Belfountain PS 199 0 161 169 176 180 187 198 209 218 216 226 228 230 234 238 243 248
TOTAL: 1,635.0 0 1,032 1,026 1,028 1,029 1,012 1,018 1,024 1,042 1,034 1,034 1,039 1,039 1,047 1,058 1,070 1,082
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 553
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
19 37 57 78 98 114 129 143 157 171 184 196 204 212 221
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 221
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 553
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) -
NOTES
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
£¤403
Britannia Rd
Mayfield Rd
Huron
tario
StRoyal Windsor Drive
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
£¤QEW
Lakeshore Rd
£¤403
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
£¤QEW
Huron
tario
StLakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Dixie
Rd
£¤427
Burnhamthorpe Rd£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dundas St
Dixie
Rd
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407
Dixie
Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
HaltonToronto
SRA02
SRA03
SRA04SRA05
SRA01 - SOUTH OF 403 & 401 / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF LAKE ONTARIO / EAST OF PEEL BND
SRA01
±
0 42 Km
Lake Ontario
Review Area: SRA01 SOUTH OF 403 & 401 / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF LAKE ONTARIO / EAST OF PEEL BND
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Applewood Heights SS 1,284.0 1,190 1,167 1,229 1,169 1,152 1,148 1,126 1,145 1,136 1,174 1,189 1,188 1,206 1,186 1,182 1,177
Cawthra Park SS 1,044.0 1,299 1,281 1,298 1,320 1,327 1,363 1,337 1,359 1,320 1,404 1,416 1,400 1,453 1,384 1,389 1,332
Clarkson SS 1,392.0 784 716 661 678 695 706 729 714 653 614 630 605 677 665 666 647
Erindale SS 1,353.0 806 901 919 880 914 943 920 905 911 872 866 860 825 790 761 750
Glenforest SS 1,023.0 1,176 1,211 1,266 1,272 1,272 1,254 1,237 1,257 1,258 1,259 1,255 1,253 1,256 1,256 1,256 1,255
Lorne Park SS 1,236.0 959 891 858 856 877 860 866 838 777 790 786 802 814 824 822 815
Port Credit SS 1,203.0 1,232 1,247 1,290 1,295 1,252 1,275 1,248 1,297 1,296 1,286 1,308 1,294 1,311 1,302 1,302 1,289
TL Kennedy SS 1,275.0 911 921 870 819 803 799 873 873 868 865 834 838 835 812 836 816
Woodlands SS 1,080.0 954 989 1,016 1,103 1,118 1,154 1,168 1,140 1,117 1,113 1,130 1,130 1,119 1,104 1,087 1,070
TOTAL: 10,890.0 0 9,311 9,323 9,407 9,392 9,411 9,502 9,503 9,528 9,335 9,377 9,413 9,371 9,497 9,325 9,299 9,150
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 1,740
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
67 133 204 275 345 416 487 558 629 700 784 868 970 1,071 1,173
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 1,173
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 1,740
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) -
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
£¤403
Britannia Rd
Mayfield Rd
Huron
tario
St
Royal Windsor Drive
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd £¤QEW
Lakeshore Rd
£¤403
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
£¤QEW
Huron
tario
St
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Dixie
Rd
£¤427
Burnhamthorpe Rd£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dundas St
Dixie
Rd
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407Halton
Toronto
SRA01
SRA03
SRA04
SRA05 SRA06
SRA02 - SOUTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / WEST OF 410 / NORTH OF 403 / EAST OF PEEL BND
SRA02
±
0 42 Km
Review Area: SRA02 SOUTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / WEST OF 410 / NORTH OF 403 / EAST OF PEEL BND
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
John Fraser SS 1,236.0 0 1,656 1,705 1,701 1,668 1,704 1,680 1,673 1,683 1,644 1,609 1,606 1,581 1,560 1,503 1,494 1,454
Meadowvale SS 1,500.0 0 1,047 1,050 994 989 984 971 947 918 893 851 830 797 762 753 746 740
Mississauga SS 1,554.0 0 1,228 1,308 1,339 1,282 1,365 1,370 1,294 1,282 1,209 1,154 1,136 1,134 1,115 1,102 1,097 1,100
Rick Hansen SS 1,725.0 0 1,670 1,628 1,528 1,488 1,433 1,371 1,375 1,283 1,183 1,169 1,137 1,177 1,161 1,154 1,168 1,178
Stephen Lewis SS 1,530.0 0 1,564 1,579 1,529 1,580 1,613 1,614 1,633 1,596 1,523 1,409 1,311 1,272 1,225 1,251 1,239 1,229
Streetsville SS 1,008.0 0 885 881 948 910 882 876 836 803 744 711 677 659 664 651 646 647
West Credit SS 990.0 0 408 398 431 460 531 531 531 531 531 531 531 531 531 531 531 531
TOTAL: 9,543.0 0 8,458 8,548 8,471 8,377 8,513 8,413 8,289 8,096 7,726 7,434 7,229 7,153 7,019 6,947 6,920 6,878
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 2,665
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
23 46 81 116 151 188 224 260 297 334 373 411 440 468 497
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 497
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 2,665
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) -
NOTES
15 Year Projections
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
£¤403
Britannia Rd
Mayfield Rd
Huron
tario
St
Countryside Dr
£¤QEW
Huron
tario
St
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Dixie
Rd
£¤427
Burnhamthorpe Rd£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dundas St
Dixie
Rd
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
Toronto
York
SRA02
SRA05
SRA04
SRA07
SRA01
SRA06
SRA03 - SOUTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF 401 / EAST OF 410
SRA03
±
0 42 Km
Review Area: SRA03 SOUTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF 401 / EAST OF 410
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Lincoln M Alexander SS 1,470.0 867 865 918 930 942 931 904 902 858 854 833 796 805 784 778 778
Turner Fenton SS 2,040.0 1,636 1,612 1,570 1,618 1,623 1,683 1,716 1,684 1,642 1,615 1,567 1,489 1,479 1,411 1,415 1,412
TOTAL: 3,510.0 0 2,503 2,477 2,488 2,548 2,564 2,614 2,621 2,586 2,500 2,469 2,400 2,286 2,284 2,195 2,193 2,189
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 1,321
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
4 9 14 19 24 30 35 40 46 51 57 62 66 71 75
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 75
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 1,321
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) -
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
£¤403
Britannia Rd
Mayfield Rd
Huron
tario
St
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Burnhamthorpe Rd£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dixie
Rd
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
£¤407
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Miss
issau
ga R
d
King St
Halton
SRA05
SRA03SRA02
SRA09
SRA06
SRA08
SRA07
SRA04 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD & RAIL / WEST OF CHINGUACOUSY / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF PEEL BND
SRA04
±
0 21 Km
Review Area: SRA04 SOUTH OF BOVAIRD & RAIL / WEST OF CHINGUACOUSY / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF PEEL BND
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Fletcher's Meadow SS 1,488.0 0 1,861 1,966 2,017 2,082 2,104 2,094 2,117 2,160 2,231 2,266 2,233 2,217 2,166 2,170 2,183 2,190
Jean Augustine SS 1,533.0 0 788 883 949 912 882 895 851 847 819 790 796 778 759 752 737 736
Parkholme School (Fletcher's Meadow) 108.0 0 163 123 144 142 194 193 187 180 179 187 185 184 183 183 184 184
TOTAL: 3,129.0 0 2,812 2,972 3,110 3,136 3,181 3,182 3,154 3,186 3,229 3,243 3,214 3,178 3,108 3,105 3,104 3,111
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 18
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
198 396 555 713 872 1,056 1,241 1,418 1,594 1,771 1,957 2,143 2,285 2,428 2,570
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 2,570
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 18
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 2,552
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
Mayfield Rd
Huron
tario
St
The G
ore R
d
Huron
tario
St
Cawt
hra R
d
Burnhamthorpe Rd£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dundas St
Dixie
Rd
Mavis
Rd
Erin
Mills
Pkwy
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Derry Rd
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
King St
Olde Baseline Rd
¬«50
Halton
Toronto
SRA04
SRA03
SRA09
SRA07
SRA08
SRA06
SRA02
SRA10
SRA05 - SOUTH OF B & C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF 410 / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF CHINGUACOUSY
SRA05
±
0 21 Km
Review Area: SRA05 SOUTH OF B & C CITY LIMITS / WEST OF 410 / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF CHINGUACOUSY
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Brampton Centennial SS 1,380.0 0 1,221 1,316 1,442 1,537 1,603 1,582 1,577 1,576 1,602 1,590 1,580 1,561 1,534 1,541 1,528 1,525
Central Peel SS 1,224.0 0 1,179 1,101 1,064 966 973 967 974 982 956 962 923 924 922 902 899 892
David Suzuki SS 1,554.0 0 1,616 1,480 1,482 1,482 1,479 1,428 1,332 1,264 1,236 1,256 1,268 1,271 1,273 1,260 1,252 1,245
Heart Lake SS 1,269.0 0 1,100 1,054 1,070 1,088 1,189 1,222 1,232 1,234 1,241 1,238 1,228 1,216 1,179 1,145 1,125 1,120
TOTAL: 5,427.0 0 5,116 4,952 5,057 5,073 5,244 5,198 5,115 5,056 5,035 5,046 4,999 4,972 4,907 4,847 4,805 4,782
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 645
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
90 180 245 309 374 443 511 577 643 709 785 862 908 953 999
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 999
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 645
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 354
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
Mayfield Rd
Huron
tario
St
The G
ore R
d
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Dixie
Rd
£¤427
Burnhamthorpe Rd£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dixie
Rd
Mavis
Rd
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
Olde Baseline Rd
¬«50
York
TorontoSRA03
SRA05
SRA04
SRA07
SRA02
SRA08SRA10
SRA09
SRA01
SRA06 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / WEST OF AIRPORT RD / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF 410
SRA06
±
0 21 Km
Review Area: SRA06 SOUTH OF BOVAIRD / WEST OF AIRPORT RD / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF 410
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Bramalea SS 1,278.0 0 1,070 1,025 1,060 1,008 1,026 981 971 946 915 952 948 964 963 936 935 930
North Park SS 1,308.0 0 1,272 1,216 1,151 1,152 1,178 1,175 1,134 1,087 1,076 1,105 1,082 1,074 1,042 986 988 988
Judith Nyman S.S. 903.0 0 502 492 513 525 533 529 528 529 529 530 529 529 529 529 529 529
TOTAL: 3,489.0 0 2,844 2,734 2,723 2,686 2,738 2,685 2,633 2,562 2,520 2,587 2,559 2,567 2,534 2,452 2,453 2,447
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 1,042
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
6 12 18 23 29 34 39 44 49 53 59 64 70 76 82
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 82
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 1,042
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) -
NOTES
15 Year Projections
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
Mayfield RdHu
rontar
io St
The G
ore R
d
£¤427
£¤410
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dixie
Rd
Mavis
Rd
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Ching
uaco
usy R
d
Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
King St
¬«50
York
TorontoSRA03
SRA05
SRA10
SRA08
SRA06
SRA09
SRA04
SRA02
SRA07 - SOUTH OF BOVAIRD /CASTLEMORE / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF AIRPORT RD
SRA07
±
0 21 Km
Review Area: SRA07 SOUTH OF BOVAIRD /CASTLEMORE / WEST OF PEEL BND / NORTH OF B & M CITY LIMITS / EAST OF AIRPORT RD
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Castlebrooke SS 1,533.0 0 1,844 1,844 1,858 1,816 1,838 1,813 1,803 1,760 1,744 1,730 1,700 1,698 1,677 1,671 1,660 1,648
Chinguacousy SS 1,020.0 0 1,151 1,096 1,121 1,065 1,059 1,061 1,031 1,044 1,010 980 966 958 944 949 932 923
TOTAL: 2,553.0 0 2,995 2,940 2,979 2,881 2,897 2,874 2,834 2,804 2,753 2,710 2,666 2,656 2,622 2,620 2,591 2,571
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: -
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
22 45 58 71 85 100 116 130 145 160 176 192 198 204 210
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 210
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities -
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 210
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
Mayfield Rd
The G
ore R
d
£¤410
£¤407
Queen St
Bovaird Dr
Dixie
Rd
Bram
alea R
d
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
¬«50
SRA09
SRA05
SRA10
SRA07
SRA06
SRA08 - S OF OLD BASELINE/ W OF AIRPORT/GOREWAY/ N OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF 410 / N OF MAYFIELD/ EAST OF PEEL BND
SRA08
±
0 10.5 Km
Review Area: SRA08 S OF OLD BASELINE/ W OF AIRPORT/GOREWAY/ N OF BOVAIRD / EAST OF 410 / N OF MAYFIELD/EAST OF PEEL BND
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Harold M Brathwaite SS 1,479.0 0 1,510 1,613 1,627 1,787 1,844 1,813 1,923 1,873 1,911 1,992 1,948 1,898 1,797 1,664 1,643 1,631
Louise Arbour SS 1,530.0 0 1,340 1,217 1,199 1,177 1,184 1,173 1,193 1,195 1,170 1,188 1,158 1,130 1,114 1,061 1,042 1,026
Sandalwood Heights SS 1,482.0 0 1,084 959 1,024 1,097 1,169 1,255 1,217 1,221 1,202 1,187 1,157 1,111 1,065 1,022 1,017 1,013
TOTAL: 4,491.0 0 3,934 3,788 3,850 4,061 4,197 4,240 4,333 4,289 4,283 4,367 4,263 4,139 3,976 3,746 3,702 3,671
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 820
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
65 131 175 220 264 321 377 430 483 536 593 650 675 700 725
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 725
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 820
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) -
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
Mayfield Rd
Huron
tario
St
The G
ore R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Dixie
Rd £¤427
Burnhamthorpe Rd£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dundas St
Dixie
Rd
Mavis
Rd
Miss
issau
ga R
d Queen St
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
The G
ore R
d
Miss
issau
ga R
d Huron
tario
St
King St
Olde Baseline Rd
King St
¬«50
¬«50
York
Simcoe
Wellington
Halton
SRA10
SRA08SRA04
SRA05
SRA07SRA06
SRA09 - SOUTH OF PEEL BND / WEST OF LINE BTWN ST ANDREWS & MOUNTAINVIEW/ N OF OLD BASELINE/ E OF PEEL BND
SRA09
±
0 42 Km
Review Area: SRA09 SOUTH OF PEEL BND / WEST OF LINE BTWN ST ANDREWS & MOUNTAINVIEW/ N OF OLD BASELINE/ E OF PEEL BND
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Mayfield SS 1,734.0 0 1,880 1,913 1,920 1,898 1,944 1,917 1,903 1,886 1,814 1,824 1,821 1,804 1,827 1,802 1,804 1,855
TOTAL: 1,734.0 0 1,880 1,913 1,920 1,898 1,944 1,917 1,903 1,886 1,814 1,824 1,821 1,804 1,827 1,802 1,804 1,855
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: -
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
76 152 241 331 421 498 575 648 720 793 895 998 1,094 1,190 1,286
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 1,286
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities -
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 1,286
NOTES
15 Year Projections
Existing Schools and Projects
15 Year Projections
Mayfield Rd
Huron
tario
St
The G
ore R
d
Wins
ton C
hurch
ill Blvd
Castlemore Rd
Lakeshore Rd
Cawt
hra R
d
Dixie
Rd £¤427
Burnhamthorpe Rd£¤403
£¤410
£¤401
£¤401
£¤407
£¤407
Dundas St
Dixie
Rd
Mavis
Rd
Miss
issau
ga R
d
Steeles Ave
Derry Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
Airpo
rt Rd
The G
ore R
d
Miss
issau
ga R
d Huron
tario
St
King St
Olde Baseline Rd
King St
¬«50
¬«50
York
Simcoe
Halton
Wellington
SRA09
SRA04 SRA05
SRA07
SRA08
SRA06
SRA10 - S OF PEEL BND / W OF PEEL BND / N OF MAYFIELD / E OF AIRPORT / ST ANDRES / MOUNTAINVIEW
SRA10
±
0 42 Km
Review Area: SRA10 S OF PEEL BND / W OF PEEL BND / N OF MAYFIELD / E OF AIRPORT / ST ANDRES / MOUNTAINVIEW
REQUIREMENTS OF EXISTING COMMUNITY
Current Number Current Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
OTG of Temp 2018/ 2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
Capacity Facilities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
Humberview SS 1,437.0 0 1,318 1,441 1,459 1,404 1,368 1,234 1,128 1,062 949 899 849 877 852 808 807 751
TOTAL: 1,437.0 0 1,318 1,441 1,459 1,404 1,368 1,234 1,128 1,062 949 899 849 877 852 808 807 751
AVAILABLE PUPIL PLACES: 686
REQUIREMENTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT (CUMULATIVE)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15
2019/ 2020/ 2021/ 2022/ 2023/ 2024/ 2025/ 2026/ 2027/ 2028/ 2029/ 2030/ 2031/ 2032/ 2033/
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034
41 82 201 320 439 550 661 756 851 946 1,055 1,163 1,253 1,343 1,433
CALCULATION OF GROWTH-RELATED PUPIL PLACE REQUIREMENTS
1 Requirements of New Development (Pupil Places) 1,433
2 Available Pupil Places in Existing Facilities 686
3 Net Growth-Related Pupil Place Requirements (1-2) 747
NOTES
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
15 Year Projection of Average Daily Enrolments
Existing Schools and Projects
Peel District School BoardEducation Development Charges Submission 2019Form G - Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs
ELEMENTARY PANEL
Net Growth- Percent of Capacity Total Number of
Proposed Related Pupil Proposed Attributed to Net Growth- Acres Required Acreage To Be Eligible Site Land Total
Review Year Of Site Location/ Place School Related Pupil Place (Footnote Funded in EDC Cost Per Education Preparation Escalation Financing Education
Area Site Status Acquisition Facility Type Requirements Capacity Requirements Oversized Sites) By-Law Period Acre Land Costs Costs Costs Costs Land Costs
ERA02 TBD 2023 New School 386 850 45.41% 8.00 3.63 3,090,000$ 11,225,788$ 50,324$ 1,165,382$ 3,363,841$ 15,805,335$
ERA04b Owned 2019 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 -$ -$ 104,000$ -$ 28,119$ 132,119$
ERA04b TBD 2025 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 3,090,000$ 24,720,000$ 114,392$ 3,248,411$ 7,592,826$ 35,675,629$
ERA04b Accommodated In Existing Schools Or Additions 206 -$
ERA07 Accommodated In Existing Schools Or Additions 412 -$
ERA09 Accommodated In Existing Schools Or Additions 326 -$
ERA14 Owned 2019 New School 823 850 96.80% 8.00 7.74 -$ -$ 100,676$ -$ 27,220$ 127,896$
ERA15 Owned 2019 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 -$ -$ 104,000$ -$ 28,119$ 132,119$
ERA15 TBD 2021 New School (Site will be in 21A) 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 1,420,000$ 11,360,000$ 107,355$ 575,100$ 3,255,952$ 15,298,407$
ERA15 Accommodated In Existing Schools Or Additions 639 -$
ERA20 Accommodated In Existing Schools Or Additions 214 -$
ERA21a TBD 2025 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 1,420,000$ 11,360,000$ 114,392$ 1,492,797$ 3,505,975$ 16,473,164$
ERA21a TBD 2026 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 1,420,000$ 11,360,000$ 116,222$ 1,492,797$ 3,506,470$ 16,475,489$
ERA21a TBD 2027 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 1,420,000$ 11,360,000$ 118,082$ 1,492,797$ 3,506,973$ 16,477,852$
ERA21a TBD 2028 New School 216 850 25.37% 8.00 2.03 1,420,000$ 2,882,133$ 30,438$ 378,736$ 889,880$ 4,181,187$
ERA21b Owned 2019 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 -$ -$ 104,000$ -$ 28,119$ 132,119$
ERA21b Owned 2019 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 -$ -$ 104,000$ -$ 28,119$ 132,119$
ERA21b Owned 2019 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 -$ -$ 104,000$ -$ 28,119$ 132,119$
ERA21b TBD 2020 New School 662 850 77.87% 8.00 6.23 1,420,000$ 8,846,136$ 82,282$ 221,153$ 2,473,795$ 11,623,366$
ERA23 Accommodated In Existing Schools Or Additions 25 -$
ERA24b TBD 2020 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 1,420,000$ 11,360,000$ 105,664$ 284,000$ 3,176,789$ 14,926,453$
ERA24b TBD 2021 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 1,420,000$ 11,360,000$ 107,355$ 575,100$ 3,255,952$ 15,298,407$
ERA24b TBD 2023 New School 191 850 22.41% 8.00 1.79 1,420,000$ 2,546,228$ 24,839$ 264,331$ 766,614$ 3,602,012$
ERA25b TBD 2022 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 1,420,000$ 11,360,000$ 109,072$ 873,478$ 3,337,090$ 15,679,640$
ERA25b TBD 2024 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 1,420,000$ 11,360,000$ 112,591$ 1,492,797$ 3,505,488$ 16,470,876$
Peel District School BoardEducation Development Charges Submission 2019Form G - Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs
ERA25b TBD 2026 New School 368 850 43.25% 8.00 3.46 1,420,000$ 4,913,130$ 50,265$ 645,626$ 1,516,527$ 7,125,548$
ERA26a TBD 2020 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 1,415,000$ 11,320,000$ 105,664$ 283,000$ 3,165,704$ 14,874,368$
ERA26a TBD 2022 New School 850 850 100.00% 8.00 8.00 1,415,000$ 11,320,000$ 109,072$ 870,402$ 3,325,443$ 15,624,917$
ERA26a Accommodated In Existing Schools Or Additions 67 -$
ERA27 Owned 2019 New School 422 850 49.65% 8.00 3.97 -$ -$ 51,633$ -$ 13,960$ 65,593$
-
Total: 18,555 19,550 184.0 156.9 168,653,415$ 2,130,318$ 15,355,907$ 50,327,092$ 236,466,732$
Peel District School BoardEducation Development Charges Submission 2019Form G - Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs
SECONDARY PANEL
Site Status Net Growth- Percent of Capacity Total Number of
(Optioned, Proposed Related Pupil Proposed Attributed to Net Growth- Acres Required Acreage To Be Eligible Site Land Total
Review Purchased, Year Of Facility Place School Related Pupil Place (Footnote Funded in EDC Cost Per Education Preparation Escalation Financing Education
Area Reserved, Etc.) Acquisition Type Requirements Capacity Requirements Oversized Sites) By-Law Period Acre Land Costs Costs Costs Costs Land Costs
SRA04 Owned 2019 New School 1,500 1,500 100.00% 16.00 16.00 -$ -$ 208,000$ -$ 56,238$ 264,238$
SRA04 TBD 2023 New School 1,052 1,500 70.13% 16.00 11.22 1,420,000$ 15,934,594$ 155,443$ 1,654,216$ 4,797,563$ 22,541,816$
SRA05 Accommodated In Existing Schools Or Additions 354 -$
SRA07 Accommodated In Existing Schools Or Additions 210 -$
SRA09 TBD 2025 New School 1,286 1,500 85.77% 16.00 13.72 1,415,000$ 19,417,287$ 196,217$ 2,551,591$ 5,992,838$ 28,157,933$
SRA10 TBD 2022 New School 747 1,500 49.77% 16.00 7.96 1,415,000$ 11,267,753$ 108,569$ 866,385$ 3,310,095$ 15,552,802$
Total: 5,149 6,000 64.00 48.91 46,619,635$ 668,229$ 5,072,191$ 14,156,734$ 66,516,789$
Peel District School BoardEducation Development Charges Submission 2019Form H1 - EDC Calculation - Uniform Residential and Non-Residential
Determination of Total Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs
Total: Education Land Costs (Form G) 302,983,521$ Add: EDC Financial Obligations (Form A2) 119,576,810$ Subtotal: Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs 422,560,331$ Add: EDC Study Costs 375,000$ Total: Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs 422,935,331$
Apportionment of Total Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs
Calculation of Uniform Residential Charge
Calculation of Non-Residential Charge - Board Determined GFA
91,735,525
0.46$
42,293,533$
380,641,798$
Total Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs to be Attributed to Non-Residential Development (Maximum 40%)
Total Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs to be Attributed to Residential Development
10%
90%
Non-Residential Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs 42,293,533$
3,476$
Residential Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs
Net New Dwelling Units (Form C)
Uniform Residential EDC per Dwelling Unit
380,641,798$
109,499
GFA Method:
Non-Exempt Board-Determined GFA (Form D)
Non-Residential EDC per Square Foot of GFA
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form H2 - EDC Calculation - Differentiated Residential and Non-Residential (Part 1 of 2)
Determination of Total Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs
Total: Education Land Costs (Form G) 302,983,521$
Add: EDC Financial Obligations (Form A2) 119,576,810.00$
Subtotal: Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs 422,560,331$
Add: EDC Study Costs 375,000.00$
Total: Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs 422,935,331$
Apportionment of Total Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs
Total Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs to be Attributed to
Residential Development 90% 380,641,798$
Total Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs to be Attributed to
Non-Residential Development (Maximum 40%) 10% 42,293,533$
Peel District School Board
Education Development Charges Submission 2019
Form H2 - EDC Calculation - Differentiated Residential and Non-Residential (Part 2 of 2)
Residential Growth-Related Net Education Land Costs:
Determination of Distribution of New Development
Distribution of Distribution of
Elementary Elementary Secondary Secondary
15-Year Gross Gross 15-Year Gross Gross Total Gross
Elementary Requirements Requirements Secondary Requirements Requirements Requirements
Net New Units Pupil Yield of New of New Pupil Yield of New of New of New Distribution
Type of Development (Form B) (Form B & C) (Form E) Development Development (Form E) Development Development Development Factor
Low Density 43,948 0.412 18,106 57.6% 0.135 5,916 65% 24,022 59%
Medium Density 20,697 0.364 7,528 24.0% 0.089 1,845 20% 9,373 23%
High Density 44,854 0.129 5,779 18.4% 0.029 1,289 14% 7,069 17%
Total 109,499 0.287 31,413 100% 0.083 9,050 100% 40,463 100%
Calculation of Differentiated Charge:
Apportionment of Differentiated
Residential Net Residential
Education Land EDC per Unit
Cost By Net New Units by
Development (Carried over Development
Type of Development (Form B) Type from above) Type
Low Density 225,978,586$ 43,948 5,142$
Medium Density 88,168,458$ 20,697 4,260$
High Density 66,494,755$ 44,854 1,482$
380,641,798$