14
Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant Education Commission of the States

Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

Education Commission of the States

House Committee Meeting on School Finance

Springfield, IllinoisApril, 2015

Michael GriffithSchool Finance ConsultantEducation Commission of the States

Page 2: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

2Education Commission of the States

Education Commission of the States

Created by states, for states, in 1965 to track state policy trends, translate academic research, provide unbiased advice and create opportunities for state leaders to learn from one another.

53 member states, territories and the District of Columbia

Contact: www.ecs.org (303) 299.3600

Page 3: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

3Education Commission of the States

School Funding Presentation

Overview of state funding formulas

Promising practices

Questions & answers

Page 4: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

Education Commission of the States

School Funding Formulas

Foundation Programs (33) (38)Resource Allocation Systems (6) (6)

Combination (5) Other (6)

Page 5: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

5Education Commission of the States

Foundation Formula (33 States)

1. Determine foundation/base amount

2. Count students with weights

3. Multiply student count by the foundation amount

4. Determine state vs. local split

5. Add on outside funding (capital, transportation, other)

Page 6: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

6Education Commission of the States

Why do so Many States Use a Foundation Formula

Easy to establish

Easily adjusted to meet a state’s/district’s educational needs and economic circumstances

Provides districts with greater autonomy in decision making

Page 7: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

7Education Commission of the States

Resource Allocation System (6 states)

1. Identify education components

2. Cost-out each component

3. Calculate the amount of resources that each district should receive

4. Determine state vs. local split

5. Add on outside funding (capital, transportation, other)

Page 8: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

8Education Commission of the States

Why Have States Adopted Resource Allocation Systems?

Clarity in the amount of resources that a district/school receives from the state

States can use this system to dictate the number of teachers (and other resources) that should be in a school

Page 9: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

9Education Commission of the States

Why Haven’t More States Adopted This System?

It is seen by some as a “top-down” system

No matter how many components you put into the system, you may miss some

Calculating the cost of each “education component” is time consuming, both for the state and districts

Page 10: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

10Education Commission of the States

Promising PracticesMassachusetts: Chapter 70

Year Adopted: 1993

How is it calculated: The formula uses a system of costs per student

Complexity: Chapter 70 funding is more complicated than foundation formulas but produces similar results

Educational Results: The funding system was adopted in the same year as the state’s new accountability/ assessment system

Page 11: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

11Education Commission of the States

Massachusetts – Chapter 70Calculation for a General Ed. Elementary Student – FY 2015

  Elementary Student

Administration $359

Instructional Leadership $649

Teachers $2,976

Other Teach Services $763

Pro Development $118

Instructional Equip & Tech $431

Guidance & Psychology $217

Pupil Services $129

Operation & Maintenance $827

Employee Benefits $745

Total $7,214

Page 12: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

12Education Commission of the States

Promising PracticesMaryland

Year Adopted: 2002

How is it calculated: The new system uses a two-tiered foundation approach

Straightforward: 27 categorical programs were eliminated

Educational results: Districts must now enter into agreements with the state about standards for student performance

Page 13: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

13Education Commission of the States

Promising PracticesRhode Island

Year Adopted: 2010

How is it calculated: Base funding is the average funding amount for CT, MA, N.H. & R.I.

A Focus on At-risk Students: The formula has two different provisions that provide additional funding for at-risk students

Phased-in Approach: The formula will be phased in over a 7 to 10 year period

Educational results: Additional funding targeted toward student achievement

Page 14: Education Commission of the States House Committee Meeting on School Finance Springfield, Illinois April, 2015 Michael Griffith School Finance Consultant

14Education Commission of the States

For More Information

Michael GriffithEducation Commission of the States

700 Broadway, Suite 810Denver, Colorado 80203

(303) 299-3600www.ecs.org

[email protected]