Economic Potential of Formation Brines: Interim Results from the … · 2019. 1. 4. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2002, Volume 2 Economic Potential

Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2002, Volume 2

Economic Potential of Formation Brines: Interim Results from theSaskatchewan Brine Sampling Program

B.J. Rostron 1, L.I. Kelley, L.K. Kreis, and C. Holmden 2

Rostron, B.J., Kelley, L.I., Kreis, L.K., and Holmden, C. (2002): Economic potential of formation brines: Interim results fromthe Saskatchewan brine sampling program; in Summary of Investigations 2002, Volume 2, Saskatchewan Geological Survey,Sask. Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2002-4.2, CD-ROM, Paper C-1, 29p.

AbstractAnalytical results are presented for 305 samples of formation waters from across Saskatchewan and surroundingareas. Samples were obtained from water source wells, producing oil wells with high water cuts (>50%), from drill-stem tests, and from grab samples (e.g., surface springs and seepages in potash mines). These data are compared tochemical data for economic brines that are either extracted for the sole purpose of mineral production or are co-produced during petroleum extraction. This comparison highlights opportunities for production or co-production ofK, Mg, Ca, I, Br, and Li from Saskatchewan brines.

Keywords: Williston Basin, geochemistry, brine, bromine, iodine, magnesium, lithium, potassium, calcium,industrial minerals.

1. IntroductionSediments of the Williston Basin host a diverse range of hydrogeologically influenced economic resources. Themost significant of these resources include: i) water supply for domestic, municipal, and industrial uses; ii) mineraldeposits, including potentially economic brines; and most importantly iii) petroleum and other energy-relatedresources. Exploration and exploitation of these resources require a clear understanding of regional hydrogeologicaland hydrochemical processes in the basin.

Chemical data on the basin fluids are needed to understand the hydrochemistry and hydrogeology of the basin.Existing data on the deeper Paleozoic formations are sparse, unevenly spaced, and normally not analyzed for theirtrace elements. Recent interest in deep hydrocarbon exploration in the Williston Basin (Haidl et al., 1996; Dancsok,and Haidl, 1997) provided a unique opportunity to collect needed chemical data on subsurface formation fluids.Thus, a joint project (Saskatchewan Brine Sampling Program) was initiated in 1996 between the SaskatchewanGeological Survey, the University of Alberta, and the University of Saskatchewan to collect samples from recentlydrilled deep wells across the basin. This sampling program has been augmented by a systematic sampling ofproducing oil wells across the basin, and by the donation of samples from oil and potash companies.

The project has several objectives, including:

1) Characterization of water chemistry and stable isotope signatures for all of the aquifers in the Williston Basin(Rostron et al., 1998).

2) Evaluation of the potential of Saskatchewan brines for use as feedstock in the production of industrial mineralsand chemicals.

3) Development of techniques for using stable isotopes to fingerprint formation fluids (Rostron and Holmden,2000; Rostron et al., 2000), for applications in oil and gas exploration and production, and potash mining.

This note is the first publication of chemical data on 305 samples collected from drill-stem tests, producing wellsand mine seeps in southern Saskatchewan and surrounding areas. Discussion is limited to a comparison of selecteddata with published analytical results for brines that are produced or co-produced (with petroleum) for the extractionof industrial chemicals. Sample collection and data interpretation are on-going. Elements of the project that will becompleted at a later date include release of additional data, including hydrogen, oxygen, and strontium isotope data,further screening of the data to identify analyses not representative of formation waters (e.g., contaminated withdrilling fluid), compilation of the data into a queriable database, and interpretation of the chemical and isotopic datain hydrodynamic context.

1 Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3.2 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2.


2. Economic Potential of Saskatchewan Brines

a) Background

Naturally occurring subsurface brines are the feedstock for a wide variety of industrial minerals and chemicals.Examples include bromide produced in Arkansas from the Upper Jurassic Smackover Formation; magnesiumchloride and bromide produced in Michigan from the Devonian Detroit River Group; lithium carbonate produced inChile and California from aquifers beneath playas and salars; iodide produced in Oklahoma from the LowerPennsylvanian Morrow Formation, and co-produced in Japanese natural gas wells; and calcium chloride producednear Slave Lake, Drumheller, and Brooks, Alberta (Ver Planck, 1957; Kunasz, 1975; Buchinski, 1988; Harben andKuzvart, 1996; Johnson, 1998; Ober, 2001; Christie and Brathwaite, 2001).

The Williston Basin is a structural region within the much larger Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Thestratigraphy of the Williston Basin is broadly similar to that of the Michigan Basin. Both are intra-cratonic basinsthat host thick successions of carbonates and evaporite-bearing strata. Potash and salt are produced in bothMichigan and Saskatchewan. Although the Michigan Basin was the birthplace (through Dow Chemical Co.) ofindustrial mineral and chemical production from formation brines (Schaetzl, 2001), exploitation of naturalformation brines in Saskatchewan has been restricted to the production of calcium and magnesium chloride brinesfor use in suppressing dust on gravel roads and for use as ballast in tractor tires (Buchinski, 1988). Given theirgeological similarity, it is possible that higher value products derived from Michigan Basin brines might also beproduced from brines of western Canada. This prospect was the foundation, in part, for the present work.

b) Previous Work

Previous work on the economic potential of Saskatchewan brines began with Buchinski (1988) who documented thechemistry, recovery, and marketing of calcium chloride-rich brine that has periodically seeped into the undergroundworkings of the Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Cory Division Mine. Ogu and Arnold (1989) surveyedindustrial mineral and chemical production from brines around the world, and discussed technologies for usingbrines as media for capturing and disposing of carbon dioxide and other waste gases produced by coal-firedgenerating plants. Lane (1989) discussed the industrial mineral and chemical potential of brines from Devonianaquifers in southern Saskatchewan, focusing primarily on CaCl2 and MgCl2. Kreis and Gent (1992) reportedchemistries of brines below the Devonian Duperow Formation in southern Saskatchewan. They pointed out thathigh concentrations of Mg and Ca were found in many of the hydrostratigraphic units investigated and suggested,based on aquifer parameters, that high production rates could be supported.

3. MethodsThe brine sampling program consists of four main steps:

1) Identification of Wells to be Sampled: When a drilling license is issued for a well that will be testing ahorizon deeper than the Bakken Formation, that well and operator/company is flagged. One or more samplecollection kits (for each drillstem test on a target horizon) are then provided to the operator at the drill site byfield-personnel from the Petroleum Development Branch of Saskatchewan Industry and Resources. In addition,producing wells with high water cuts (>50% water) from strategic locations are targeted for sampling bymembers of the project team.

2) Sample Collection: Drill-stem test (DST) samples are collected voluntarily by companies during drilling andtesting. Each sample kit consists of three empty, 250 ml “Nalgene” brand sample bottles in a re-sealable plasticbag. Operators are asked to fill two bottles with a representative sample of the recovered formation fluid andthe third with a sample of the drilling fluid (at the time of testing). Bottles are labeled “A”, “B”, and “DrillingFluid”. Collected samples are shipped to the Saskatchewan Industry and Resources Subsurface CoreLaboratory, where the “A” bottle is acidified with 2 ml of concentrated, double-distilled, 2.8 N nitric acid in aneffort to prevent precipitation of the ions in solution. Safety considerations and shipping regulations precludedacidification of the “A” sample at the well site, but testing demonstrated that later acidification still providedexcellent quality data.

Wellhead samples were collected directly from the producing wells. Oil-water emulsions were sampled into 8or 12 litre pre-cleaned plastic jugs. The water fraction was pre-filtered through glass wool, then through a0.45 µm filter, and then aliquoted for field tests and laboratory analyses.

3) Re-labeling and Splitting of the Samples: Samples are shipped to the University of Alberta where they are re-labeled, transferred, and split into “anonymous” 125 ml sample containers. In this manner, confidentiality of theoperator, date, well name, location, interval, and fluid recovery are maintained. The samples are then sent tovarious laboratories for analysis.


4) Sample Analyses: Several different laboratories are used for different analyses. Cl, Na, Br, and I, are measuredusing Epithermal Neutron Activation Analysis (Duke and Rostron, in press) at the SLOWPOKE Reactor at theUniversity of Alberta. This ENAA technique was specifically developed for this study to obtain betteranalytical precision on samples of saline brines. The remainder of the major and minor ions are obtained usingstandard ICP-AES methods at a commercial laboratory in Edmonton, Alberta. Alkalinity is measured bytitration at a commercial laboratory in Edmonton, Alberta. Approximately 5% of the samples were run as blindreplicates. Precision of the analyses generally depends on the technique and sample dilution prior to analysis.Generally, reported results are significant to three figures. Charge balance errors were usually


Tab

le 1

- C

ompa

riso

n b

etw

een

the

chem

istr

y of

typi

cal “

com

mer

cial

” br

ines

wit

h s

elec

ted

Sas

katc

hew

an b

rin

es. P

ubl

ish

ed d

ata

for

prod

uci

ng

oper

atio

ns

from

Ver

Pla

nck

(195

7), H

itch

on a

nd

Hol

ter

(197

1), K

un

asz

(197

5), B

uch

insk

i (19

88),

Kre

is a

nd

Gen

t (19

92),

Har

ben

an

d K

uzv

art (

1996

), J

ohn

son

(19

98),

Obe

r (2

001)

, an

d C

hri

stie

an

dB

rath

wai

te (

2001

). I

n g

ener

al, t

hese

pu

blic

atio

ns

repo

rted

con

cen

trat

ion

s fo

r on

e or

a f

ew io

ns,

in s

ome

case

s as

an

ave

rage

val

ue,

an

d in

oth

er c

ases

as

a ra

nge

. Th

epr

evio

usl

y pu

blis

hed

val

ues

in th

is ta

ble

shou

ld n

ot b

e co

nst

rued

as

anal

ytic

al r

esu

lts,

in th

at c

once

ntr

atio

ns

repo

rted

for

an

y pa

rtic

ula

r br

ine

may

be

com

pile

d fr

om s

ever

aldi

ffer

ent s

ourc

es. C

once

ntr

atio

ns

that

wer

e re

port

ed b

y m

ore

than

on

e so

urc

e di

d n

ot a

lway

s ag

ree,

bu

t wer

e ge

ner

ally

clo

se, s

o an

ave

rage

of

thos

e re

port

ed v

alu

es is

reco

rded

. Th

e co

mpi

led

data

is n

ot c

ompl

ete,

ther

efor

e m

ean

ingf

ul c

har

ge b

alan

ces

can

not

be

calc

ula

ted,

nor

wil

l th

e se

para

te a

nal

ytes

rep

orte

d su

m to

equ

al th

e re

port

edT

DS

. All

con

cen

trat

ion

s ar

e ex

pres

sed

as m

g/l.

Pu

blis

hed

an

alys

es w

ere

in s

ome

case

s or

igin

ally

exp

ress

ed a

s pe

rcen

t oxi

des

or c

hlo

ride

s an

d re

-cal

cula

ted,

bdl

=be

low

dete

ctio

n li

mit

.

Pu

blis

hed

An

alys

es o

f E

con

om

ic B

rin

esS

ourc

e o

fB

rLi

IM

gB

Ca

Cl

Na

KT

DS

Bri

nes

ben

eath

sal

ars

and

pla

yas

Sala

r de A

taca

ma, C

hile

Li,

NaC

l, K

Cl,

B1000

8000

500

500

185000

95000

20000

370000

Sal

ar d

e H

ombr

e M

uert

o, A

rgen

tina

Li91

426

840

010

0019

5000

1220

0093

4034

1000

Searles

Lake

, C

alif

orn

iaB

,Li,

KC

l, N

a2S

O4

85

100

3000

Dea

d S

ea, (

Dee

p M

embe

r) Is

rael

Br,

Mg,

K50

0025

4200

017

200

2190

0040

000

7600

3150

00C

layt

on V

alle

y, N

evad

aLi

200-

300

Dee

p f

orm

atio

n b

rin

esS

mack

ove

r F

orm

atio

n, A

rkansa

sB

r30

00-5

000

174

2634

6513

434

000

1700

0067

000

2800

Detr

oit

Riv

er

Gro

up.,

Mic

hig

an

Br,

I, K

Cl,

NaC

l, C

aC

l 213

00-2

500

4010

000

7000

021

0000

2250

031

3000

Morr

ow

Form

atio

n, O

klahom

aI

300

Tom

igusk

u F

orm

atio

n, Ja

pan

I85

Kas

azu

Gro

up, J

apan

I10

0

Sea

wat

erN

aC

l, I

65

0.1

80.0

61350

4.6

400

1900

10500

380

35000

Brin

e In

flow

, Cor

y M

ine-

from

Buc

hins

ki (

1988

)C

aCl 2

4890

2340

013

8000

3210

00

Sam

ple

No

.F

ield

Fo

rmat

ion

exls

dse

ctw

prn

gm

er

U o

f A 0

1 -

052

366

3P

CS

Cor

y M

ine

Pra

irie

Eva

porit

e54

602.

78.

520

400

108

1350

0030

1000

8160

1720

049

1933

U o

f A 0

1 -

054

20

33

1IM

C E

ster

hazy

Min

eP

rairi

e E

vapo

rite

1540

31.0

bdl

8680

03

1040

2835

0012

900

1490

040

1868

U o

f A

01 -

208 A

& B

91

620

52

2W

illm

ar

Fro

bish

er35

850

.346

.713

3024

050

7015

4198

8949

636

1025

5017

U o

f A 0

1 -

020

191

15

34

55

2S

teelm

an

Bird

bear

628

34.0

36.8

1890

204

15000

186370

92472

3890

301743

U o

f A 0

1 -

004B

21

10

38

52

Cla

rilaw

Dupero

w709

83.7

19.5

2400

195

17600

189000

91300

4710

307180

U o

f A 9

8 -

077A

11

14

66

62

Min

ard

Yeo

man

509

69.9

7.9

1620

110

1340

018

3000

1010

0072

7030

8201

U o

f A 9

8 -

095A

41

814

47

2K

ingsf

ord

Bird

bear

722

47.4

34.4

2190

242

18000

180011

88493

6800

297943

U o

f A 0

1 -

159 A

& B

31

814

47

2K

ingsf

ord

Red R

iver

499

68.6

8.1

2040

103

17500

181000

93300

4230

299523

U o

f A 9

8 -

099

A1

419

48

2M

acou

nD

uper

ow80

010

8.0

20.1

2170

203

1850

018

7766

8909

066

7030

6831

U o

f A 0

0 -

064

A31

74

11

92

Goo

sebe

rry

Lake

Red

Riv

er/H

eral

d32

211

2.0

3.8

2020

7416

900

1872

1594

600

3430

3054

75U

of A

98

- 12

3 C

31

818

711

2M

idal

eD

uper

ow10

2855

.121

.835

7019

128

200

2018

0784

690

5540

3266

80U

of A

98 -

120 A

114

36

813

2H

um

e N

ort

hS

ouris

Valle

y934

67.4

24.0

3410

168

25600

199195

86885

5690

323358

U o

f A 0

0 -

025

133

36

521

2H

ardy

Sou

thW

inn

ipe

g20

2.7

0.4

127

4294

37500

14500

18100

71691

U o

f S 9

7 -

077A

92

214

88

2S

toughto

nR

ed R

iver

438

76.2

4.2

1610

7914

000

1360

0097

600

3630

2554

20U

of A

00 -

033 A

115

26

212

Har

dyY

eom

an42

4.6

81.1

7060

1225

300

1040

0024

000

1120

1630

51

Lo

cati

on

Sas

katc

hew

an f

orm

atio

n b

rin

es� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

��

��

��

� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

��

��

� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �


either a stratigraphic or geographic sense to conclude that any one formation or area is more prospective, withrespect to economic brine potential, than another. It is notable that the degree of element enrichment (with respect toseawater) is not uniform. For example, samples containing the highest concentrations of Br are not the highest withrespect to Li, Mg or I, and vice versa. More detailed analysis, focused on systematic variations with respect togeography and hydrostratigraphy may point to areas or stratigraphic units with higher potential to host potentiallyeconomic brines.

It should be stressed that the brine data collected to date represents a very low density sampling of the formationwaters of the Williston Basin. The DST sample locations are more-or-less a matter of seizing an opportunity ratherthan strategically targeting an area or hydrostratigraphic unit. In this light, it is remarkable that for Br, I, Li, K, Mg,and Ca, the data set includes Saskatchewan brines with concentrations of the same order of magnitude as brinesfrom currently producing operations elsewhere.

6. ConclusionsBrines associated with petroleum reservoirs in southern Saskatchewan contain concentrations of K, Mg, Br, I, Ca,and Li that merit further investigation. These brines are in a variety of aquifers in the stratigraphic section, and overa large part of the Williston Basin. Compositions vary, and the degree of element enrichment (with respect toseawater) is not uniform.

These brines could possibly be utilized as a feedstock for industrial mineral extraction. In Saskatchewan, co-production of brine and extraction of “economic minerals” may present an opportunity for petroleum operators toturn the operating expense of brine disposal into an industrial minerals and chemical production revenue stream.

Figure 1 - Sample location map for Saskatchewan brine samples included in Table 1.

SASKATOON

REGINA

WEYBURN

MOOSE JAW

U of A 00 - 033 A

U of A 01 - 052

U of A 01 - 054

SWIFT CURRENTU of A 98 - 120 A

U of A 98 - 123 C

U of A 00 - 064 A

U of A 97 - 077 A

U of A 01 - 004 B

U of A 98 -077 A

U of A 01 - 020

U of A 01 - 208 A&B

U of A 98 - 098 A

U of A 98 - 095 A

Saskatchewan

Montana North Dakota

ESTEVANU of A 00 - 025

U of A 01 - 159 A&B

0 50 100 150 20025Kilometres

Legend

Samples

Cities

Lakes


7. AcknowledgmentsThis research was supported by NSERC Operating Grants to Rostron and Holmden. Major funding was providedby: a grant from the Saskatchewan Initiatives Fund, Grants-in-Aid of Research by the Potash Corporation ofSaskatchewan; and funding from Berkley Petroleum and Nexen Canada Limited. Heather Iampen, Nadine Watson,Erin Cowell, Gavin Jensen, Christian Miller, and Amanda Gaze collected samples from producing wells. JeffCoolican is thanked for figure preparation.

The cooperation of the many companies which have returned samples and allowed access to their wells is greatlyappreciated. The assistance of personnel from the Petroleum Development Branch of Saskatchewan Industry andResources is critical to the program and greatly appreciated.

8. ReferencesBuchinski, K.W. (1988): The occurrence, recovery, and commercial application of calcium chloride brine from a

Saskatchewan potash mine; in 90th Annual Meeting of CIM, Edmonton, Paper No. 22, 16p.

Christie, T. and Brathwaite, B. (2001): Mineral Commodity Report 19–Beryllium, Gallium, Lithium, Magnesium,Uranium and Zirconium, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Science, Ltd.; www.med.govt.nz/crown_minerals/minerals/docs/comreports/report19_beryllium.pdf, accessed 1 Oct 2002.

Dancsok, E.F.R. and Haidl, F.M. (1997): Update on new oil discoveries in Devonian and Ordovician strata,southeastern Saskatchewan; in Summary of Investigations 1997, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask.Energy Mines, Misc. Rep. 97-4, p193-194.

Duke, M.J.M., and Rostron, B.J. (in press): Determination of Bromine, Iodine, Chlorine, and Sodium in highlysaline formation waters by epithermal NAA; J. Radioanalyt. Nuclear Chem., accepted September 2002.

Haidl, F.M., Kreis, L.K., and Dancsok, E.F.R. (1996): New oil discoveries in Ordovician Red River strata,southeastern Saskatchewan; in Summary of Investigations 1996, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Sask.Energy Mines, Misc. Rep. 96-4, p136-144.

Harben, P.W. and Kuzvart, M. (1996): Industrial minerals: A global geology; Industrial Minerals InformationLtd./Metal Bull. PLC, London, 462p.

Hitchon, B. and Holter, M.E. (1971): Calcium and magnesium in Alberta brines; Alta. Resear. Counc., Econ. Geol.Rep. 1, 39p.

Johnson, K.S. (1998): Recent activities in iodine exploration and development in northwestern Oklahoma; in 34thForum on the Geology of Industrial Minerals, Norman, Guidebook, Field Trip 2, p18-20.

Kreis, L.K. and Gent, M. (1992): Sub-Duperow formation brines in southern Saskatchewan; Sask. Energy Mines,Open File Rep. 92-1, 77p.

Kunasz, I.A. (1975): Lithium raw materials; in Lefond, S.J. (ed.), Industrial Minerals and Rocks, Amer. Inst. Min.,Met. Petrol. Eng., p791-803.

Lane, D. (1989): Saskatchewan subsurface brines in Souris River, Dawson Bay, and Winnipegosis formations;Sask. Dep. Miner. Resour., unpubl rep., 44p.

Ober, J.A. (2001): Lithium; U.S. Geological Survey Minerals Yearbook 2001, U.S. Geol. Surv., p46.1-46.5.

Ogu, E. and Arnold, A. (1989): A preliminary study of the evaluation of opportunities for the utilization of naturallyoccurring brines for the production of chemicals; Sask. Energy Mines, unpubl. internal rep. 99p.

Rostron, B.J. and Holmden, C. (2000): Fingerprinting formation waters using stable isotopes, Midale area, WillistonBasin, Canada; J. Geochem. Expl., v69-70, p219-223.

Rostron, B.J., Holmden, C., and Kreis, L.K. (1998): Hydrogen and oxygen isotope compositions of Cambrian toDevonian formation waters, Midale area, Saskatchewan; in Eight International Williston Basin Symposium,Sask. Geol. Soc., Spec. Publ. No. 13, p267-273.


Rostron, B.J., Iampen, H.T., and Holmden, C. (2000): Spatial variability of stable isotopic compositions offormation fluids in the Williston Basin: Implications for fingerprinting; in Geocanada 2000, Calgary,Conference CD, ext. abstr. #1034.

Schaetzl, R.J. (2001): Dow Chemical, Michigan State University, http://www.geo.msu.edu/geo333/dow.html,accessed 19 Sept 2002.

Ver Planck, W.E.H. (1957): Salt in California: San Francisco; California Dept. Nat. Resour., Bull. 175, 168p.


Appendix 1 – Brine Sample Locations and Sampling Notes

Information on wells sampled was obtained from public sources. While the data have been checked carefully, some errors and many omissions remain, and should be brought to the attention of the senior author (B.J000. Rostron). Data in this appendix are available in digital format upon request to the corresponding author (L.I. Kelley).

Sample ID ex lsd sec twp rng mer FieldKB elev.,

m mslGround elev,

m mslKB

LatitudeKB

Longitude Sample interval, depth, mmidpoint depth, m

midpoint elev, m Latitude Longitude Formation °C Depth Comments General Comments Type

U of A 00 - 002 133 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 1833-1858 1845.5 -1096.0 49.35 104.82 Lodgepole 56.4 1845.5 from DST DST#1 Middle, rec 150metres, sample S99-06253-3, 25% mud in bottle

DST-company

U of A 00 - 003 133 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 1833-1858 1845.5 -1096.0 49.35 104.82 Lodgepole 56.4 1845.5 from DST DST#1 Bottom, rec 150metres, sample S99-06253-4, black&sour? Bacteria?

DST-company

U of A 00 - 004 133 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 1833-1858 1845.5 -1096.0 49.35 104.82 Lodgepole 56.4 1845.5 from DST DST#1 BHS#1, rec 150metres, sample S99-06253-5, 25% mud in bottle, slightly smelly

DST-company

U of A 00 - 005 133 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 1833-1858 1845.5 -1096.0 49.35 104.82 Lodgepole 56.4 1845.5 from DST DST#1 BHS#2, rec 150metres, sample S99-06253-6, 10% mud in bottle, bacteria acting?

DST-company

U of A 00 - 010 B 41 11 16 6 5 2 Browning 602.1 597.1 49.47 102.63 1292-1297 1294.5 -692.4 49.47 102.63 Frobisher DST#1 Bottom, rec 312m: 294m gassy oil, 18m salt h2o, 99-12-7, 5556

DST

U of A 00 - 011 B 41 10 30 4 21 2 Hardy South 751.0 745.0 49.33 104.82 2791-2912 2846.0 -2095.0 49.33 104.82 Winnipeg 88.0 BHT+10% Swab 24, 2000-feb 04, rept says 2040-2161m Winnipeg snd? Swab

U of A 00 - 012 133 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 2743-2746 2744.5 -1995.0 49.35 104.82 Yeoman 79.4 2746.0 from DST Swab 12, lots of oil, labelled 5274?, 99K079, 24-2-00 Swab

U of A 00 - 013 11 11 2 9 13 2 Hume N 613.5 608.8 49.71 103.67 2433.5-2443, 2445-2446.5 2440.0 -1826.5 49.71 103.67 Yeoman labelled 5413 wellhead-company?

U of A 00 - 014 A 8 37 52 Wildcat 713.5 709.6 48.98 104.89 2909-2937 2923.0 -2209.5 48.98 104.89 Red River 'C' rec 2536 ft mud cut sw, 99/12/28 DST

U of A 00 - 015A 8 37 52 Wildcat 713.5 709.6 48.98 104.89 2671-2686 2678.6 -1965.1 48.98 104.89 Winnipegosis rec 282 ft sli stain OCM, 99/12/22, looks like mud DST

U of A 00 - 016A 8 37 52 Wildcat 713.5 709.6 48.98 104.89 2270-2274 2272.1 -1558.6 48.98 104.89 Nisku 99/12/17, 25% mud in container? DST

U of A 00 - 017 A 121 9 13 2 22 2 Big Muddy 761.2 756.6 49.12 104.82 2375-2384 reported, wellfile says depth corr to 2382-2394

2386.0 -1624.8 49.12 104.82 Duperow 79.0 2386.0 from DST DST#1, rec 885m (200 C+ 20m Mud+665m br SW, sal 100ppt) OIL BASED MUD, 99/12/20

DST

U of A 00 - 018 A 121 9 13 2 22 2 Big Muddy 761.2 756.6 49.12 104.82 2656-2668 2662.0 -1900.8 49.12 104.82 Winnipegosis 83.0 2662.0 from DST DST#2, rec 890m fluid (294m WC+70m Mud+562m SW, 190ppt) OIL BASED MUD, 99/12/25

DST

U of A 00 - 019 133 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 est from wellfile wpg ss2798-pc@2986

2892.0 -2142.5 49.35 104.82 Winnipeg/Deadwood 88.0 BHT+10% first flow on test S00-06292-1, jan 25-00 wellhead-company?


2892.0 -2142.5 49.35 104.82 Winnipeg/Deadwood 88.0 BHT+10% at 300 units of gas on flow test, sample s00-06292-2, jan 25-00 wellhead-company?


2892.0 -2142.5 49.35 104.82 Winnipeg/Deadwood 88.0 BHT+10% at 740 units of gas on flow test, sample s00-06292-3, jan 25-00 wellhead-company?

U of A 00 - 022 133 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 2830-2840.5 2835.3 -2085.8 49.35 104.82 Winnipeg 78.2 2835.5 from DST DST#3, Top, S-00-06290-1, trace mud in container, estimated recovery 2690m?

DST

U of A 00 - 023 133 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 2830-2840.5 2835.3 -2085.8 49.35 104.82 Winnipeg 78.2 2835.5 from DST DST#3, Bottom, S-00-06290-2, trace mud in container DST

U of A 00 - 024 133 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 2830-2840.5 2835.3 -2085.8 49.35 104.82 Winnipeg 78.2 2835.5 from DST DST#3, tool A, S-00-06290-3, trace mud in container, sal 185g/l DST

U of A 00 - 025 133 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 2830-2840.5 2835.3 -2085.8 49.35 104.82 Winnipeg 78.2 2835.5 from DST DST#3, tool b, S-00-06290-4, trace mud in container, layer of black stinky gunk? Bacteria?

DST

U of A 00 - 029B 91 7 30 4 21 2 Hardy S 753.5 749.8 49.33 104.82 oh 2809-3111, tvd 2727.6-2747m, checked wellfile

2737.0 -1983.5 49.32 104.82 Red River 82.0 2747.0 from logs, confirm by DST

no info on bottles, prob prod test?cant be DST#2 (no h20), likely not DST #1 (SourV, rec 250m TDS 140g/l)

wellhead-company?

U of A 00 - 029C 91 7 30 4 21 2 Hardy S 753.5 749.8 49.33 104.82 oh 2809-3111, tvd 2727.6-2747m, checked wellfile



wellhead-company?

U of A 00 - 029D 91 7 30 4 21 2 Hardy S 753.5 749.8 49.33 104.82 oh 2809-3111, tvd 2727.6-2747m, checked wellfile



wellhead-company?

U of A 00 - 030A 21 12 28 5 19 2 Ceylon 729.1 721.9 49.41 104.51 2732-2737.5 perfs, checked wellfile

2734.5 -2005.4 49.41 104.51 Yeoman 93.0 2734.5 from DST's SWABS, 31/10/2000, swab 15, Swab

U of A 00 - 030B 21 12 28 5 19 2 Ceylon 729.1 721.9 49.41 104.51 2732-2737.5 perfs, checked wellfile

2734.5 -2005.4 49.41 104.51 Yeoman 93.0 2734.5 from DST's SWABS, swab 15 Swab

U of A 00 - 030C 21 12 28 5 19 2 Ceylon 729.1 721.9 49.41 104.51 2732-2737.5 perfs, checked wellfile

2734.5 -2005.4 49.41 104.51 Yeoman 93.0 2734.5 from DST's SWABS, #27, 30/10/2000 Swab

Sample LocationWellhead Location Sample Temp



m mslGround elev,

m mslKB

LatitudeKB




U of A 00 - 031 A 2 9 26 6 2 2 Queensdale 602.9 598.0 49.50 102.17 1507-1516 1511.5 -908.6 49.50 102.17 Birdbear 58.0 1511.5 from DST DST#1, rec 3.1m3, july 8/99, 62m WCM+530mW(260,000 ppm), oil based mud

DST

U of A 00 - 032 A 21 8 4 9 13 2 Hume North 604.8 600.4 49.70 103.70 2432-2440 2436.0 -1831.2 49.70 103.70 Yeoman DST#1, 99-07-16, rec 3m crude+73m gas cut fm water DST

U of A 00 - 033 A 1 15 2 6 21 2 Hardy 761.7 756.0 49.45 104.73 2690-2692 2691.0 -1929.3 49.45 104.73 Yeoman Swab, 99/08/04, rec water Swab

U of A 00 - 033 B 1 15 2 6 21 2 Hardy 761.7 756.0 49.45 104.73 2672-2675 2673.5 -1911.8 49.45 104.73 Coronach Swab, 99/08/11, rec water Swab

U of A 00 - 036 B 41 16 10 5 6 2 Steelman 595.7 591.5 49.38 102.73 2313-2319 2316.0 -1720.3 49.38 102.73 Winnipegosis DST#3, used invert drilling mud, rec 644m=200m oil, 240m W, 200m mud

DST

U of A 00 - 038 A 21 3 24 7 7 2 Forget 607.8 603.6 49.57 102.83 2586-2595 2590.5 -1982.7 49.57 102.83 Winnipeg? (Ordovician?) 85.6 2590.5 from DST#1 DST#1, nov 9/99, rec 115m WC+ 56m invert+389m GSW (2 tests, 1 trip, says lowK, all fluid from DST #2)

DST

U of A 00 - 039 A 21 3 24 7 7 2 Forget 607.8 603.6 49.57 102.83 2497.5-2505 2501.3 -1893.5 49.57 102.83 Yeoman 88.8 2501.3 from DST3-4 DST#4, nov11/99, invert mud, 86m fW+328m SW+72m invert, 258 ppt, run w/DST3, rept states ~253m rec from DST#4

DST

U of A 00 - 040 A 21 3 24 7 7 2 Forget 607.8 603.6 49.57 102.83 2464-2475.5 2469.8 -1862.0 49.57 102.83 Yeoman 87.7 2469.8 from DST#6 DST#6, nov12/99, invert mud, 30m WC+1690m oil, 433m water, 258,000 tds

DST

U of A 00 - 041 B 21 7 15 5 5 2 Steelman 593.4 589.0 49.38 102.60 2224-2230 2227.0 -1633.6 49.38 102.60 Winnipegosis 81.4 4day buildup on 7-26

DST#2, rec 150m mud+90m oil+50m SW, nov 28/99 DST

U of A 00 - 041 C 21 7 15 5 5 2 Steelman 593.4 589.0 49.38 102.60 2221-2242 2231.5 -1638.1 49.38 102.60 Winnipegosis 81.4 4day buildup on 7-26

DST#1, rec 15m gco+1000m ocsw, nov 26/99 DST

U of A 00 - 043 B 21 4 15 12 8 2 Bemersyde 669.1 664.9 49.99 103.03 2147.5-2159.5 2153.5 -1484.4 49.99 103.03 Red River 65.5 2153.5 from DST#2 DST#2, rec 215m (193m oil, 2 m W, 20m invert), dec8/99, sal 230,000

DST

U of A 00 - 044 A 21 9 13 2 22 2 Big Muddy 761.2 756.6 49.12 104.82 2373-2385 reported, wellfile says depth corr to 2382-2394

2386.0 -1624.8 49.12 104.82 Duperow 'D' 79.0 2386.0 from DST DST#1, rec 885m (200 C+ 20m Mud+665m br SW, sal 100ppt) OIL BASED MUD, 99/12/20

DST

U of A 00 - 045A 33 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 1833-1858 1845.5 -1096.0 49.35 104.82 Lodgepole 56.4 1845.5 from DST DST#1, Dec 23/99, rec 60m W+90m mud DST

U of A 00 - 046 B 41 7 28 10 10 2 Creelman 629.1 624.9 49.85 103.30 2415-2421 2418.0 -1788.9 49.85 103.30 Winnipeg 82.5 2418.0 from DST#1 DST#1, rec 2370m oil, 28m W, invert mud, sal 255,000 DST

U of A 00 - 049 B 41 7 28 10 10 2 Creelman 629.1 624.9 49.85 103.30 2408-2414 2411.0 -1781.9 49.85 103.30 Winnipeg 84.4 2411.0 from DST#5 DST#5, rec 348m oil, 122m invert mud, 1m SW, sal 255,000 DST

U of A 00 - 050 B 41 7 28 10 10 2 Creelman 629.1 624.9 49.85 103.30 2391-2397 2394.0 -1764.9 49.85 103.30 Winnipeg 84.0 2394.0 from DST#6 DST#6, rec 170m W, 20m invert mud, sal 232,000 DST

U of A 00 - 051 A 33 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 2734.8-2758 2745.6 -1996.1 49.35 104.82 Yeoman 79.4 2746.0 from DST DST#2, jan 8/2000, rec 548m water cut w/oil+892m oily salt water+1440m W+202m watery Mud w/oil stain, sal 240g/l, sample lost from BHS

DST

U of A 00 - 052 A 41 10 30 4 21 2 Hardy South 751.0 745.0 49.33 104.82 2478-2488 2483.0 -1732.0 49.33 104.82 Winnipegosis 72.5 2483.0 from DST DST#1, jan 12/2000, rec 2316m (510m WC+1000m OC gassy mud+800m OC gassy H2o)

DST

U of A 00 - 053 A 33 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 2830-2840.5 2835.3 -2085.8 49.35 104.82 Winnipeg 78.2 2835.5 from DST DST#3, jan 25/2000, rec 2690m salt water?, lost recovery to hole… DST

U of A 00 - 054 A 33 3 6 5 21 2 Hardy South 749.5 746.0 49.35 104.82 2800-2820 2810.0 -2060.5 49.35 104.82 Winnipeg 78.2 2810.0 from other DST DST#5, jan 26/2000, rec 2525m 310m W+10m mud+2215m SW DST

U of A 00 - 055 A 31 11 33 3 21 2 Salt Lake 780.9 776.3 49.26 104.78 2150-2156 2153.0 -1372.1 49.26 104.78 Birdbear 69.1 2153.0 from DST DST#1, feb 11/00, rec 292m (20m M+ 272m brackish SW) sal 70,000 DST

U of A 00 - 059 A 11 2 5 5 21 2 Hardy South 754.6 750.1 49.35 104.79 2669-2679 2674.0 -1919.4 49.35 104.79 Stonewall/Gunton 78.8 2674.0 from DST DST#2, rec 300m W+473m invert Mud+57m WC, used invert mud, april 25/2000

DST

U of A 00 - 060 A 11 2 5 5 21 2 Hardy South 754.6 750.1 49.35 104.79 2847-2853 2850.0 -2095.4 49.35 104.79 Winnipeg 79.8 2850.0 from DST DST#1, april 24/2000, rec 2417m W, 210,000 ppm+250mWC, invert mud

DST

U of A 00 - 061 A 11 2 5 5 21 2 Hardy South 754.6 750.1 49.35 104.79 2187.5-2195 2191.3 -1436.7 49.35 104.79 Duperow 70.3 2191.3 from DST DST#3, rec 1063m brackish W 30,000 tds, used invert mud, april 26/2000

DST

U of A 00 - 062 A 31 7 4 11 9 2 Gooseberry Lake 648.6 644.4 49.88 103.18 2398-2405 2401.5 -1752.9 49.88 103.18 Winnipeg 79.8 2401.5 from DST DST#3, may22/00, rec 2018m (165m WC+1853m SW) tds 260g/l, invert mud

DST

U of A 00 - 063 A 31 7 4 11 9 2 Gooseberry Lake 648.6 644.4 49.88 103.18 2263-2270 2266.5 -1617.9 49.88 103.18 Yeoman 77.5 2266.5 from DST DST#4, may23/00, rec 905m (165m WC+40m Mud+700m SW) TDS 235g/l, invert mud

DST



m mslGround elev,

m mslKB

LatitudeKB




U of A 00 - 064 A 31 7 4 11 9 2 Gooseberry Lake 648.6 644.4 49.88 103.18 2232-2245 2238.5 -1589.9 49.88 103.18 Red River/Herald 75.5 2238.5 from DST DST#6, may24/00, rec 255m (165m WC+30m invertmud+60m fm wtr), invert mud, TDS 300g/l

DST

U of A 00 - 065 A 21 6 36 12 15 2 Francis 609.8 605.3 50.04 103.93 2294-2309 2301.5 -1691.7 50.04 103.93 Winnipeg 73.4 2301.5 from DST#1 DST#1, july 11/2000, rec 224m WC+1835m salt water, sal 226,000, rev circ

DST

U of A 00 - 066 A 21 6 36 12 15 2 Francis 609.8 605.3 50.04 103.93 2206-2213 2209.5 -1599.7 50.04 103.93 Yeoman 71.3 2209.5 from DST#2 DST#2, july 12/2000, rec 82m mcO+101m wcO+210m ocW, sal 246,000

DST

U of A 00 - 067 A 21 6 36 12 15 2 Francis 609.8 605.3 50.04 103.93 2198-2205 2201.5 -1591.7 50.04 103.93 Yeoman 71.3 2201.5 from DST#3 DST#3, july 13/2000, rec 85m salt water, sal 224,000 DST

U of A 00 - 068 A 21 6 36 12 15 2 Francis 609.8 605.3 50.04 103.93 1915-1930 1922.5 -1312.7 50.04 103.93 Winnipegosis 68.4 1922.5 from DST#4 DST#4, july 14/2000, rec 1216m salt water, sal 234,000 DST

U of A 00 - 070 B 21 15 23 9 23 2 Dahinda 727.8 723.2 49.75 105.02 2719-2735 2727.0 -1999.2 49.75 105.02 Deadwood DST#3, rec 2360m, BHS#18(80%sediment) DST

U of A 00 - 071 A 21 15 23 9 23 2 Dahinda 727.8 723.2 49.75 105.02 2719-2735 2727.0 -1999.2 49.75 105.02 Deadwood DST#3, rec 2360m Bubble Hose#5 DST

U of A 01 - 003B 31 13 34 4 6 2 597.0 593.0 49.35 102.74 1386.5-1392 ? Perfs 1389.3 -792.3 49.35 102.74 Ratcliffe SWAB, 2001-01-02 Swab

U of A 01 - 003C 31 13 34 4 6 2 597.0 593.0 49.35 102.74 1386.5-1392 ? Perfs 1389.3 -792.3 49.35 102.74 Ratcliffe SWAB, 2001-01-02 Swab

U of A 01 - 004B 21 10 3 8 5 2 Clarilaw 603.9 599.0 49.62 102.60 1700-1701.5 1700.8 -1096.9 49.62 102.60 Duperow SWAB, jan 8, 2001 bottletop says 5218-2 Swab

U of A 01 - 014B 21 8 14 5 3 2 Willmar 592.1 587.7 49.38 102.30 49.38 102.30 Frobisher DST-1, sample from chamber, #5280 DST-company

U of A 01 - 015B 91 9 14 5 13 2 Weyburn 569.2 565.4 49.39 103.64 49.39 103.65 Midale june 15/01 wellhead-company

U of A 01 - 016 91 6 20 5 2 2 Willmar 582.3 578.0 49.40 102.23 49.40 102.24 Frobisher from Wellhead, collected by nexen may 24/01 wellhead-company

U of A 01 - 017 41 2 34 5 2 2 Willmar 594.2 588.6 49.42 102.20 49.42 102.19 from Battery, collected by Nexen june 28/01 battery-company

U of A 01 - 019 191 15 34 5 5 2 Steelman 600.9 592.1 49.43 102.60 1739-1750 1744.5 -1143.6 49.43 102.60 Birdbear 72.0 1744.5 from dst DST-1, fluid rec #3, 2001-06-22 DST



U of A 01 - 022B 191 15 34 5 5 2 Steelman 600.9 592.1 49.43 102.60 1739-1750 1744.5 -1143.6 49.43 102.60 Birdbear 72.0 1744.5 from dst DST-1, chamber #001, 2001-06-22 DST

U of A 01 - 023B 191 15 34 5 5 2 Steelman 600.9 592.1 49.43 102.60 1739-1750 1744.5 -1143.6 49.43 102.60 Birdbear 72.0 1744.5 from dst DST-1, chamber #263, 2001-06-22 DST

U of A 01 - 024 21 3 35 7 5 2 Clarilaw East 603.5 599.0 49.60 102.59 49.60 102.59 Frobisher? - check Swab #30, upper perf point, july1/01 Swab

U of A 01 - 025 21 3 35 7 5 2 Clarilaw East 603.5 599.0 49.60 102.59 49.60 102.59 Frobisher? - check Swab #26, last sample, June 30/01 Swab

U of A 01 - 026 21 3 35 7 5 2 Clarilaw East 603.5 599.0 49.60 102.59 49.60 102.59 Frobisher? - check Swab #13, lower perf point, July 01/01 Swab

U of A 01 - 028A 92 8 6 10 15 2 McTaggart 575.0 570.4 49.79 104.02 2116-2129 2122.5 -1547.5 49.79 104.02 Interlake DST#1, rec brine, august 11,2000, rept states misrun DST

U of A 01 - 030B 42 7 30 7 8 2 Viewfield 616.3 611.7 49.59 103.07 2167-2189.5 2178.3 -1562.0 49.59 103.07 Winnipegosis DST#1, 252m (200m M+52mW) invert mud, sept 30,2000 DST

U of A 01 - 031A 21 15 23 9 23 2 Dahinda 727.8 723.2 49.75 105.02 2719-2735 2727.0 -1999.2 49.75 105.02 Deadwood DST, nov 16,2000 rec 2300m salt water DST

U of A 01 - 032A 11 7 12 7 4 2 Wordsworth 600.9 596.7 49.54 102.42 1560-1570 1565.0 -964.1 49.54 102.42 Birdbear DST#1, Nov 22/2000, rec 200m (180m W+ 20m M) DST



m mslGround elev,

m mslKB

LatitudeKB




U of A 01 - 033A 91 5 20 4 21 2 Hardy S 739.1 735.7 49.32 104.81 1582-1591 1586.5 -847.4 49.31 104.81 Poplar 56.7 1586.5 from DST DST #1, Dec 3,2000, rec 1189 m water, sal 30,000, invert mud DST

U of A 01 - 035A 41 3 11 10 16 2 Yellowgrass 574.9 570.4 49.80 104.07 2460-2471 2465.5 -1890.6 49.80 104.07 Winnipeg DST, Feb 13/01, rec 15m3, Distillate mud DST

U of A 01 - 037A 41 3 11 10 16 2 Yellowgrass 574.9 570.4 49.80 104.07 1607-1622 1614.5 -1039.6 49.80 104.07 Birdbear DST, Feb 15/01, rec 0.45m3 mud+1.2m3 salt water, distillate mud DST

U of A 01 - 038A 31 13 1 12 11 2 Gooseberry 670.3 666.2 49.97 103.39 1243-1259 1251.0 -580.7 49.97 103.39 Souris Valley Chalk DST, Mar 4/01, rec 909m DST

U of A 01 - 040A 191 15 34 5 5 2 Steelman 600.9 592.1 49.43 102.60 1739-1750 1744.5 -1143.6 49.43 102.60 Birdbear 72.0 1744.5 from dst DST, June 22/01, rec 1452m, invert mud DST

U of A 01 - 051 21 10 28 5 1 2 Queensdale 577.5 49.42 102.08 49.42 102.08 Frobisher? Check - new well wellhead-company

U of A 01 - 052 36 6 3 PCS Cory Mine 52.08 106.81 Mine Level ~1000 Prairie Evaporite Precise location is unknown Mine Level seep

U of A 01 - 054 20 33 1 IMC Esterhazy Mine

50.73 101.93 Mine Level ~930 Prairie Evaporite Precise location is unknown Mine Level seep

U of A 01 - 057= uofs9914

91 10 9 36 25 3 Luseland 709.3 705.1 52.08 109.51 hz well, from survey 754.3 -45.0 52.08 109.51 Bakken 29.0 bht from 10-9v logs

Wellhead wellhead

U of A 01 - 059=uofs9920

21 14 1 35 26 3 Plover Lake 740.0 736.3 51.98 109.59 810-814, checked wellfile 812.0 -72.0 51.98 109.59 Bakken 31.0 812.0 est from BHT+10%

Wellhead wellhead

U of A 01 - 060=uofs9924

21 11 15 35 27 3 Plover Lake 731.7 727.6 52.01 109.78 810-814 812.0 -80.3 52.01 109.78 Bakken 32.0 861.0 BHT from logs Wellhead wellhead

U of A 01 - 152 A & B

91 14 7 10 7 2 Lost Horse Hill 616.4 611.8 49.81 102.94 TVD 1161.5, HZ various 1161.5 -545.1 49.81 102.94 Alida? wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 153 A & B

91 1 20 10 7 2 Handsworth 648.2 643.7 49.84 102.91 TVD 1182.8, Hz various 1182.8 -534.6 49.83 102.91 Alida wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 154 A & B

92 11 5 10 7 2 Lost Horse Hill 616.6 611.8 49.80 102.93 1158.6 TVD? Various HZ 1158.6 -542.0 49.79 102.93 Alida? wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 155 A & B


U of A 01 - 156 A & B

31 10 19 6 8 2 Benson 600.8 596.4 49.49 103.07 1361.5-1363 1362.3 -761.5 49.49 103.07 Frobisher? wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 157 A & B

91 3 19 10 6 2 Handsworth 712.4 707.7 49.83 102.82 2hz legs+sidetrack, TVD 1246.9m,1247m cf wellfile

1247.0 -534.6 49.83 102.81 Alida no logs, no DSTS wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 158 A & B

41 8 14 4 7 2 Kingsford 592.8 588.3 49.30 102.84 2409.5-2413 2411.3 -1818.5 49.30 102.84 Winnipegosis wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 159 A & B

31 8 14 4 7 2 Kingsford 593.4 589.4 49.30 102.84 2673.8-2723, various 2698.4 -2105.0 49.30 102.84 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 160 A & B

91 15 27 5 5 2 Steelman 596.2 591.5 49.42 102.59 3 legs, tvd 2204.55, 2202.64, 2205.37

2204.6 -1608.4 49.42 102.60 Winnipegosis 81.4 4day buildup on 7-26

wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 161 A & B

1 5 30 6 8 2 Benson 600.8 597.1 49.50 103.08 1349.3-1351.5 1350.4 -749.6 49.50 103.08 Midale? wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 162 A & B

91 8 6 10 15 2 McTaggaart 574.9 570.6 49.79 104.02 2507-2510, 2513-2514, 2526-2527 Meas Depth

2517.0 -1942.1 49.79 104.02 Winnipeg wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 163 A & B

91 12 34 8 13 2 Mansur 604.4 599.5 49.70 103.70 TVD REDRIVER 2394.9, hz 2394.9 -1790.5 49.69 103.70 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 164 A & B

32 7 2 10 9 2 Harthaven 628.5 622.5 49.79 103.12 open hole (2406-2427m) 2416.5 -1788.0 49.79 103.12 Winnipeg 88.0 BHT+10% wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 165 A & B

91 7 2 10 9 2 Harthaven 625.3 621.0 49.79 103.12 2293-2301 2297.0 -1671.7 49.79 103.12 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 166 A & B

41 14 32 9 9 2 Creelman South 633.6 628.0 49.78 103.19 2275.0-2275.5, 2348-2357.8 MD cf wellfile

2343.0 -1709.4 49.78 103.19 Red River(+Stonewall) 80.0 2343.0 cf DST wellhead August-2001 wellhead



m mslGround elev,

m mslKB

LatitudeKB




U of A 01 - 167 A & B

41 12 1 10 9 2 Harthaven 626.3 622.0 49.79 103.11 2288.5-2303.5 2296.0 -1669.7 49.79 103.11 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 168 A & B

1 5 1 7 11 2 Midale 606.6 602.0 49.53 103.38 1707.5-1709.5, 1359-1360 mixed 49.53 103.38 Bakken+Midale DUAL! 71.0 wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 169 A & B

5 26 5 5 2 Steelman 594.9 591.2 49.41 102.59 hz well, tvd 2200.9 leg1, tvd 2204.4 leg2

2202.0 -1607.1 49.41 102.59 Winnipegosis 81.4 4day buildup on 7-26


U of A 01 - 170 A & B

21 4 15 12 8 2 Bemersyde 669.1 664.9 49.99 103.03 2148-2155, 2156-2158.5 2153.3 -1484.2 49.99 103.03 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 171 A & B

91 10 15 6 19 2 Ceylon 729.1 723.7 49.46 104.48 hz well, est from TVD Bakken 1947.0 -1217.9 49.47 104.48 Bakken wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 172 A & B

91 14 5 10 7 2 Lost Horse Hill 618.8 614.3 49.79 102.92 1166.5 TVD, hz various 1166.5 -547.7 49.80 102.92 Alida? wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 173 A & B


U of A 01 - 174 A & B

11 3 4 6 5 2 Browning 598.8 594.6 49.44 102.63 2187.5-2195.0 2191.3 -1592.5 49.44 102.63 Winnipegosis wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 175 A & B

91 5 16 9 10 2 Creelman 618.5 612.9 49.73 103.31 2380-2386, 2387-2391, checked wellfile

2385.5 -1767.0 49.73 103.31 Red River 80.0 2382.0 from DST wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 176 A & B

2 12 21 31 21 3 Dodsland 684.8 680.8 51.67 108.93 2026.5-2049 2037.8 -1353.0 51.67 108.93 Deadwood 69.0 wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 201 A & B

NESW 9 163 87 Newporte 552.0 548.0 48.96 101.97 2917.5-2919 2918.2 -2366.2 48.96 101.97 Deadwood 94.4 Aug 17?/01, treater sample + wellhead sample centrifuged wellhead

U of A 01 - 202 A & B

SWNE 3 163 87 Newporte 524.6 528.5 48.98 101.94 2788-2804 2794.3 -2269.8 48.98 101.94 Deadwood 90.0 Surfactron DN87 D.E., water tank after treater. Wellhead DNS tank after separator

U of A 01 - 203 A & B

91 4 2 7 11 2 Midale 613.3 608.0 49.53 103.40 dd 1960-2492m, TVD 1884-1891 cfwellfile

1887.5 -1274.2 49.52 103.40 Duperow 76.0 Aug 17/01, wellhead

U of A 01 - 204A 31 8 17 6 13 2 Weyburn 582.2 578.5 49.47 103.71 1026.6-1056.7 1041.6 -459.4 49.47 103.71 Mannville Aug 16/01, filtered Aug 17/01 wellhead

U of A 01 - 205A 21 5 16 6 13 2 Weyburn 580.6 577.6 49.47 103.71 1024.1-1065 1044.0 -463.4 49.47 103.71 Mannville Aug 16/01 wellhead

U of A 01 - 206A 41 5 16 6 13 2 Weyburn 579.8 575.3 49.47 103.70 1021-1062 1041.5 -461.7 49.47 103.70 Mannville Aug 16/01 wellhead

U of A 01 - 207 A & B

91 6 20 5 2 2 Willmar 582.3 578.0 49.40 102.23 49.40 102.24 Frobisher Aug 7/01 wellhead-company

U of A 01 - 208 A & B

91 6 20 5 2 2 Willmar 582.3 578.0 49.40 102.23 49.40 102.24 Frobisher July 27/01 wellhead-company

U of A 01 - 209 A & B

91 6 20 5 2 2 Willmar 582.3 578.0 49.40 102.23 49.40 102.24 Frobisher Aug 1/01 wellhead-company

U of A 01 - 401 A & B

1 7 26 2 19 2 Hummingbird 741.3 737.3 49.15 104.44 2301.2-2319.5 various 2310.4 -1569.1 49.15 104.44 Birdbear A-408X Emulsifier, 63X Corgard wellhead

U of A 01 - 402 A & B

31 6 26 2 19 2 Hummingbird 730.1 726.0 49.15 104.45 2301-2306.5, 2315-2316 2308.5 -1578.4 49.15 104.45 Birdbear no chemicals wellhead

U of A 01 - 403 A & B

1 10 26 2 19 2 Hummingbird 742.2 737.0 49.15 104.44 2306.8-2326.2, various 2316.5 -1574.3 49.15 104.44 Birdbear no chemicals wellhead

U of A 01 - 404 A & B

1 3 26 2 19 2 Hummingbird 737.0 733.3 49.15 104.45 2225.2-2229.2 2227.2 -1490.2 49.15 104.45 Bakken no chemicals wellhead

U of A 01 - 405 A & B

1 15 2 3 21 2 Minton 763.2 757.6 49.19 104.73 2183-2185 2184.0 -1420.8 49.19 104.73 Birdbear wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 406 A & B

11 13 8 3 21 2 Minton 710.0 702.1 49.20 104.80 2526-2528 2527.0 -1817.0 49.20 104.80 Winnipegosis wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 407 A & B

1 5 17 3 21 2 Minton 745.5 740.9 49.21 104.81 2565-2567.5 2566.3 -1820.8 49.21 104.81 Winnipegosis wellhead August-2001 wellhead



m mslGround elev,

m mslKB

LatitudeKB




U of A 01 - 408 A & B

1 1 10 3 21 2 Minton 771.0 766.1 49.19 104.74 2602-2604 2603.0 -1832.0 49.19 104.74 Winnipegosis wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 409 A & B

91 7 30 4 21 2 Hardy S 753.5 749.8 49.33 104.82 oh 2809-3111, tvd 2727.6-2747m, checked wellfile


Wellhead Aug 28/01 wellhead

U of A 01 - 410 A & B

91 15 30 4 21 2 Hardy S 752.1 746.1 49.34 104.82 tvd 2737.2, md 3241.0, yeoman top2724m TVD, 2785 md, checked

wellfile

2730.0 -1977.9 49.33 104.82 Red River 81.2 from nearby well wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 411 A & B

1 11 2 3 21 2 Minton 774.8 770.2 49.18 104.73 2609.1-2611.5 2610.3 -1835.5 49.18 104.73 Winnipegosis wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 412 A & B

91 5 20 4 21 2 Hardy S 739.1 735.7 49.32 104.81 oh TVD2729-2735 from wellfile, temps from logs

2732.0 -1992.9 49.31 104.81 Red River 86.0 2730.0 from logs+flow test

Wellhead, Aug 28/01 wellhead

U of A 01 - 413 A & B

91 7 21 13 11 2 Montmarte 660.7 656.8 50.10 103.44 TVD 2160.1 2160.1 -1499.4 50.10 103.45 Red River 72.0 from 10-21 buildup


U of A 01 - 414 A & B

21 8 21 13 11 2 Montmarte 660.9 653.9 50.10 103.44 2143.5-2156, various 2150.0 -1489.1 50.10 103.44 Red River 72.0 from 10-21 buildup


U of A 01 - 415 A & B

21 4 22 13 11 2 Montmarte 660.4 655.4 50.09 103.44 2152-2155.5, 2158-2160 2156.0 -1495.6 50.09 103.44 Red River 72.0 2156.0 from 10-21 buildup


U of A 01 - 416 A & B

91 1 21 13 11 2 Montmarte 660.9 656.1 50.10 103.44 2146 TVD from wellfile, no logs 2151.5 -1490.6 50.09 103.44 Red River 72.0 from 10-21 buildup


U of A 01 - 417 A & B

91 7 23 14 12 2 Chapleau Lake 669.4 664.8 50.18 103.53 md 2246.5-2880, tvd 2117.5 cfwellfile

2117.5 -1448.1 50.18 103.54 Red River 71.0 2117.5 from buildup static gradient test in wellfile wellhead

U of A 01 - 418 A & B

31 16 14 14 12 2 Chapleau Lake 667.4 663.3 50.18 103.53 2115-2122,various 2118.5 -1451.1 50.18 103.53 Red River 71.0 2118.5 16-14 buildup ? Injection well wellhead

U of A 01 - 419 A & B

41 1 27 14 12 2 Chapleau Lake 667.5 661.6 50.20 103.56 2119-2122 2120.5 -1453.0 50.20 103.56 Red River 72.5 from 5 day buildup


U of A 01 - 420 A & B

91 8 14 14 12 2 Chapleau Lake 668.9 664.7 50.18 103.53 hz well, leg 2, from survey 2150.0 -1481.1 50.17 103.53 Red River 71.0 16-14 buildup wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 421 A & B

21 6 28 13 11 2 Montmarte 665.6 660.1 50.11 103.46 2145.5-2170, various 2157.5 -1491.9 50.11 103.46 Red River 72.0 2158.0 from 10-21 buildup


U of A 01 - 422 A & B

11 4 4 12 8 2 Corning 659.5 655.5 49.96 103.05 2173-2178.5 2175.8 -1516.3 49.96 103.05 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 423 A & B

21 16 32 11 10 2 Fillmore 679.1 674.4 49.96 103.33 2256.3-2265.3, 2265.8-2268 2262.2 -1583.1 49.96 103.33 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 424 A & B

31 12 11 12 9 2 Gooseberry Lake 647.6 642.7 49.98 103.14 2178-2184.5 2181.3 -1533.7 49.98 103.14 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 425 A & B

41 11 27 14 12 2 Chapleau Lake 666.0 661.4 50.20 103.57 2107-2118 2112.5 -1446.5 50.20 103.57 Red River 72.5 2117.3 from 5 day buildup


U of A 01 - 426 A & B

21 15 10 13 12 2 Mutrie 656.8 653.8 50.07 103.56 2184-2189.5 2186.8 -1530.0 50.07 103.56 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 427 A & B

1 1 15 13 12 2 Mutrie 660.4 656.1 50.08 103.56 2176-2185 2180.5 -1520.1 50.08 103.56 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 428 A & B

21 11 34 13 8 2 Peebles 691.3 686.5 50.13 103.02 2072.5-2074.5 2073.5 -1382.2 50.13 103.02 Red River 61.8 2073.5 temp from buildup


U of A 01 - 429 A & B

91 4 28 13 11 2 Montmarte 662.5 658.0 50.11 103.45 hz well, various depths from survey 2146.0 -1483.5 50.11 103.46 Red River 72.0 2146.0 from 10-21 buildup


U of A 01 - 430 A & B

91 6 28 13 11 2 Montmarte 662.4 657.2 50.11 103.45 TVD 2156 2156.0 -1493.6 50.11 103.46 Red River 72.0 2156.0 from 10-21 buildup


U of A 01 - 431 A & B

11 1 5 13 13 2 Tyvan 611.0 606.7 50.05 103.74 2176.3-2177.5, 2179-2183 2179.7 -1568.7 50.05 103.74 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 432 A & B

11 8 5 13 13 2 Tyvan 614.0 609.3 50.05 103.74 2168-2170.5 2169.3 -1555.3 50.05 103.74 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 433 A & B

41 11 29 12 13 2 Tyvan 607.7 602.8 50.03 103.75 2175.6-2195.5, various 2185.6 -1577.9 50.03 103.75 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead



m mslGround elev,

m mslKB

LatitudeKB




U of A 01 - 434 A & B

11 2 29 13 13 2 Tyvan 629.6 625.8 50.11 103.74 2147.5-2168 various 2157.5 -1527.9 50.11 103.74 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 435 A & B

1 10 28 13 13 2 Tyvan 640.2 635.5 50.11 103.72 2156.8-2172 various 2164.7 -1524.5 50.11 103.72 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 01 - 436 A & B

21 16 28 13 13 2 Tyvan 639.4 634.3 50.12 103.72 2160.3-2163.8 2162.1 -1522.7 50.12 103.72 Red River wellhead August-2001 wellhead

U of A 98 - 012B 41 8 3 9 13 2 Hume North 611.0 606.6 49.70 103.68 2526-2558? Check with Berkley, have wellfile

2542.0 -1931.0 49.70 103.68 Winnipeg 90.4 2542.0 DST collected by Berkley, June 10/98, sample from swab #16 Swab

U of A 98 - 017-2B 41 8 3 9 13 2 Hume North 611.0 606.6 49.70 103.68 2441-2461, BHS 2451.0 -1840.0 49.70 103.68 Yeoman 89.5 2451.0 2 DST's labelled s98-05661-2, DST#4, middle #1, rec 265m (20m SW+15m O+50m OCM+180m OfM)

DST

U of A 98 - 017-3B 41 8 3 9 13 2 Hume North 611.0 606.6 49.70 103.68 2441-2461, BHS 2451.0 -1840.0 49.70 103.68 Yeoman 89.5 2451.0 2 DST's labelled s98-05661-3, DST#4, middle #2, 25500 mg/l cl, rec 265m (20m SW+15m O+50m OCM+180m OfM)

DST


DST


DST


DST


DST


DST

U of A 98 - 018 dupe

92 8 16 6 11 2 Midale 594.6 589.7 49.47 103.42 1832-1843 1837.5 -1242.9 49.47 103.42 Birdbear 75.0 collected by Berkley, BHS, rec 1552m water, (tool labelled S98-05658-1?)

DST

U of A 98 - 018-1B 92 8 16 6 11 2 Midale 594.6 589.7 49.47 103.42 1832-1843 1837.5 -1242.9 49.47 103.42 Birdbear 75.0 labelled S98-05658-1, 50% solids in container DST

U of A 98 - 018-2B 92 8 16 6 11 2 Midale 594.6 589.7 49.47 103.42 1832-1843 1837.5 -1242.9 49.47 103.42 Birdbear 75.0 labelled S98-05658-2, trace solids in container DST




U of A 98 - 018-6B 92 8 16 6 11 2 Midale 594.6 589.7 49.47 103.42 1832-1843 1837.5 -1242.9 49.47 103.42 Birdbear 75.0 labelled S98-05658-6, trace solids in container, lowest of all DST

U of A 98 - 028 A SWNE 14 163 99 Ambrose 643.1 639.5 48.95 103.49 2563-2565,2568-2571,2574-2575 2568.6 -1925.4 48.95 103.49 Duperow 87.8 Wellhead, 19/8/98 wellhead

U of A 98 - 070A 1 1 1 18 8 3 Morse 739.8 735.8 50.49 106.97 2240-2247 2243.5 -1503.7 50.49 106.97 Deadwood 66.2 2243.5 from DST DST#1, rec 1250m salt water, 75000 tds, 16/8/97 DST

U of A 98 - 071A 1 1 1 18 8 3 Morse 739.8 735.8 50.49 106.97 1717-1724 1720.5 -980.7 50.49 106.97 Souris River/Dawson Bay? 52.6 1720.0 from DST DST#5, 18/8/97 MISRUN DST

U of A 98 - 075A 1 9 2 6 6 2 Weir Hill 600.9 595.6 49.44 102.70 1746-1753 1749.5 -1148.6 49.44 102.70 Birdbear 70.7 from DST DST#4, rec 748m murky salt W, 262,000 ppm 31/1/98, gel salt sat DF DST

U of A 98 - 077A 11 14 6 6 6 2 Minard 599.3 595.1 49.45 102.80 2539-2565 2542.0 -1942.7 49.45 102.80 Yeoman 92.8 2542.0 from DST DST#1, 27/2/98, rec 1423m (300m WC+ 1123m os H2O, sal 247,000) DST

U of A 98 - 078A 21 4 5 9 8 2 Stoughton N 628.4 622.4 49.70 103.07 2397-2427 MD 2412.0 -1783.6 49.70 103.06 Red River 27/2/98, rec 1600m, DST #2, 100m oil+1500m Water DST

U of A 98 - 079A 41 9 23 8 10 2 Froude 615.2 610.4 49.66 103.25 2448-2469 2458.5 -1843.3 49.66 103.25 Yeoman 90.0 2458.5 from DST DST#2, 14/2/98, rec 1792m salt Water, sal 224,000 DST

U of A 98 - 080A 11 10 13 10 17 2 YellowGrass 582.7 578.2 49.82 104.18 2335-2352 2343.5 -1760.8 49.82 104.18 Yeoman 1/3/98, rec 500m W, DST#2 DST



m mslGround elev,

m mslKB

LatitudeKB




U of A 98 - 081A 21 1 4 4 11 2 Torquay N 568.2 563.3 49.26 103.42 2104.4-2129 2116.7 -1548.5 49.26 103.42 Birdbear DST#3, 18/3/98, rec 940m W+20m Mud DST

U of A 98 - 083A 11 4 24 7 17 2 Abbot E 638.3 632.4 49.57 104.19 2563-2596 2579.5 -1941.2 49.57 104.19 Yeoman DST#3, 12/4/98, DST

U of A 98 - 084A 31 2 18 6 21 2 Hardy 762.6 756.8 49.47 104.82 2685-2697 2691.0 -1928.4 49.47 104.82 Red River 77.5 2691.0 from DST DST#2, 22/5/98, rec 500m WC+50m mud+100m muddy water DST

U of A 98 - 086A 21 6 28 13 11 2 Montmarte 665.6 660.1 50.11 103.46 2236-2247 2241.5 -1575.9 50.11 103.46 Winnipeg 78.0 2242.0 from DST 12/5/98, rec 290m DST

U of A 98 - 087A 21 8 22 4 7 2 Kingsford 594.2 589.1 49.31 102.86 2711-2735 2723.5 -2129.3 49.31 102.86 Yeoman 91.1 2723.5 from DST DST#2, 21/5/98, rec 725m WC+1035m MCW, 239,000 tds (mud=187,000)

DST

U of A 98 - 093A 11 4 14 11 5 2 Hazelwood 755.4 750.9 49.90 102.59 2235-2250 2242.5 -1487.1 49.90 102.59 Yeoman 58.0 2242.5 from DST DST#1, 4/7/98, rec 433m (76m DM+357m SW, sal 231-227 ppt) DST

U of A 98 - 094A 42 11 12 6 20 2 Ceylon 707.9 703.8 49.46 104.57 2058-2072 2065.0 -1357.1 49.46 104.57 Birdbear 77.1 2065.0 from DST DST#1, 25/6/98, rec 496m (120m muddy W+ 376m brackish W) 11,540 ppm

DST

U of A 98 - 095A 41 8 14 4 7 2 Kingsford 594.0 588.2 49.30 102.84 1912-1921.5 1916.3 -1322.3 49.30 102.84 Birdbear 82.3 1916.3 from 2 DSTs DST#2, 15/11/97, rec 711m (11m mud+700m SW, sal 42,000) DST

U of A 98 - 096A 11 16 23 2 1 2 Glen Ewen 557.3 552.9 49.14 102.03 2285.5-2298.5 2292.5 -1735.2 49.14 102.03 Interlake 75.2 2292.5 from 3 DSTs DST#2, 15/11/97, rec 200m WC+1135m SW, tds 250,000 DST

U of A 98 - 098 A 91 5 16 9 10 2 Creelman 618.5 612.9 49.73 103.31 2369.5-2393.4 2382.0 -1763.5 49.73 103.31 Red River 80.0 2382.0 from DST DST#1, 19/11/97, 548m (58m GOCM+340m OFM+427m+121m OFM+29m SW, U&R 141m WC, rev circ, sal 250,000)

DST

U of A 98 - 099 A 1 4 19 4 8 2 Macoun 587.2 582.8 49.31 103.08 2098-2102 2000.0 -1412.8 49.31 103.08 Duperow 90.0 2000.0 from DST DST#2, 24/11/97, rec 551m (548m W+ 3m M, 237,000 ppm) DST

U of A 98 - 100 A 21 10 13 5 1 2 Queensdale 572.4 568.5 49.39 102.01 1176-1180.2 1188.1 -615.7 49.39 102.01 Frobisher 47.5 1188.1 from 2 DSTs DST#2, 11/12/97, rec 914m (34m gmco+120m go+760m gassyW) 192,000 tds

DST

U of A 98 - 102 A 31 13 3 1 16 2 Flat Lake 692.3 684.7 49.01 104.07 2406.5-2412.9 2409.0 -1716.7 49.01 104.07 Upper Nisku 92.0 2409.0 from DST#1 DST#1, 24/12/97, rec 127m gassy ocm+1750m gassy W, sal 227,000 tds

DST

U of A 98 - 103 A 1 1 22 7 11 2 Midale 610.4 605.8 49.57 103.41 2574-2579 2576.5 -1966.1 49.57 103.41 Lower Yeoman 92.0 2576.5 89.3 on DST DST#1, 25/12/97, rec 450m WC+490m gas cut SW, 260,000 tds DST

U of A 98 - 104 A 1 1 22 7 11 2 Midale 610.4 605.8 49.57 103.41 2543-2554 2548.5 -1938.1 49.57 103.41 Upper Yeoman 92.0 2548.5 86.3 on DST DST#2, 26/12/97, rec 540m WC+ 100m oil cut SW+400m gas&oil cut SW, 263,000 tds

DST

U of A 98 - 106 A 11 15 30 8 10 2 Froude 613.9 609.4 49.68 103.34 2414-2434 2424.0 -1810.1 49.68 103.34 Yeoman 5/1/98, rec 794m W DST

U of A 98 - 110 A 11 15 30 8 10 2 Froude 613.9 609.4 49.68 103.34 2105-2112 2108.5 -1494.6 49.68 103.34 Winnipegosis 11/1/98, rec 301m W DST

U of A 98 - 114 B 11 13 14 4 25 2 Roncott 754.1 749.1 49.30 105.28 1865-1872 1869.5 -1115.4 49.30 105.28 Lodgepole, Mud Mound 64.2 1869.5 from DST DST#3, rec 1053m oil+580m W 24/1/98, sal 111,500 DST

U of A 98 - 119 A 21 1 4 4 11 2 Torquay N 568.2 563.3 49.26 103.42 1665-1674.5 1669.3 -1101.1 49.26 103.42 Midale DST#2, 8/3/98, rec 76m W+114m Mud DST

U of A 98 - 120 A 1 14 36 8 13 2 Hume North 615.3 610.8 49.70 103.65 1911.6-1925.8? 1916.1 -1300.8 49.70 103.65 Souris Valley 9/3/98, rec 618m, 118m mW, 480m W, 20m salt H2O DST

U of A 98 - 121 A 13 4 2 7 11 2 Midale 614.5 610.1 49.52 103.40 2358 2358.0 -1743.5 49.52 103.40 Interlake 83.0 29/7/98, wellhead-company

U of A 98 - 121 B 13 4 2 7 11 2 Midale 614.5 610.1 49.52 103.40 2358 2358.0 -1743.5 49.52 103.40 Interlake 83.0 29/7/98, 11:15 AM fluid while circulating. Muddy water with 20 gas wellhead-company

U of A 98 - 121 C 13 4 2 7 11 2 Midale 614.5 610.1 49.52 103.40 2358 2358.0 -1743.5 49.52 103.40 Interlake 83.0 29/7/98, 12:15 PM fluid while circulating. Just after flow check fluid from shaker

wellhead-company

U of A 98 - 121 D 13 4 2 7 11 2 Midale 614.5 610.1 49.52 103.40 2358 2358.0 -1743.5 49.52 103.40 Interlake 83.0 29/7/98, 1:45 PM fluid flow &drilling mud 660 with gas (killing well) wellhead-company

U of A 98 - 121 E 13 4 2 7 11 2 Midale 614.5 610.1 49.52 103.40 2358 2358.0 -1743.5 49.52 103.40 Interlake 83.0 29/7/98, 3:15 PM sample of flow fluid after extended flow, 730u gas wellhead-company

U of A 98 - 123 A 31 8 18 7 11 2 Midale 617.6 613.2 49.56 103.48 1873-1879 1876.0 -1258.4 49.56 103.48 Duperow 76.0 23/9/98, Swab #12 Swab



m mslGround elev,

m mslKB

LatitudeKB




U of A 98 - 123 B 31 8 18 7 11 2 Midale 617.6 613.2 49.56 103.48 1873-1879 1876.0 -1258.4 49.56 103.48 Duperow 76.0 23/9/98, Swab #13 Swab

U of A 98 - 123 C 31 8 18 7 11 2 Midale 617.6 613.2 49.56 103.48 1987.5-1991.0 1989.3 -1371.7 49.56 103.48 Duperow 76.0 23/9/98, Swab #14 Swab

U of A 98 - 124 B 31 14 12 6 11 2 Midale 605.7 600.8 49.46 103.37 2721-2763mKB 2742.0 -2136.3 49.46 103.37 Winnipeg 95.0 14/10/98, swab Swab

U of A 98 - 124 D 31 14 12 6 11 2 Midale 605.7 600.8 49.46 103.37 2721-2763mKB 2742.0 -2136.3 49.46 103.37 Winnipeg 95.0 14/10/98, swab Swab

U of A 98 - 124 F 31 14 12 6 11 2 Midale 605.7 600.8 49.46 103.37 2721-2763mKB 2742.0 -2136.3 49.46 103.37 Winnipeg 95.0 14/10/98, swab Swab

U of A 98 - 125 A 92 8 16 6 11 2 Midale 594.6 589.7 49.47 103.42 1832-1843 1837.5 -1242.9 49.47 103.42 Birdbear 75.0 DST#1, 24/5/98, rec 300m mcsw+1352m SW, s98-05658 DST

U of A 98 - 126 A 11 5 34 7 20 2 Pangman 712.5 709.1 49.60 104.64 2576-2593 2584.0 -1871.5 49.60 104.64 Yeoman 90.5 2584.0 from DST DST#1, 14/7/98, rec 118m wc+ 303m W[181,000]+ 1142m Mud+W, mud sal=20,000

DST

U of A 98 - 127 A 11 5 34 7 20 2 Pangman 712.5 709.1 49.60 104.64 2581-2594 2587.5 -1875.0 49.60 104.64 Yeoman 87.8 2587.5 from DST DST#2, 18/7/98, rec 109m WC+ 340m Water+123m OWF (53,600 tds), mud=17,000

DST

U of A 98 - 128 A 11 15 4 7 10 2 Huntoon 608.5 603.9 49.53 103.30 2532-2561 2546.5 -1938.0 49.53 103.30 Yeoman 87.5 2548.0 from DST#3 29/10/98, wellhead collected by Wascana wellhead-company

U of A 98 - 132 A 91 11 28 3 12 2 Bromhead 596.3 589.3 49.23 103.57 2850 2850.0 -2253.7 49.24 103.57 Yeoman? 95.0 2850.0 BHT+10% on vert

11/11/98, collected by Wascana, from leg 2 wellhead-company

U of A 98 - 133 A 5 12 8 8 2 Stoughton 618.1 613.9 49.63 102.98 1114-1117 1115.5 -497.4 49.63 102.98 Gravelbourgh 19/10/98, collected by Wascana wellhead-company

U of A 98 - 134 A 41 12 3 15 31 1 Red Jacket 548.1 543.5 50.25 101.68 735.8-741.5 738.7 -190.6 50.25 101.68 Bakken 38.0 BHT+10% from nearby well

12/3/1998, wellhead-company

U of A 98 - 135 A 1 22 6 28 1 Manitoba 49.49 101.18 ? 49.49 101.18 Birdbear 21/12/98, collected by Wascana wellhead-company

U of A 99 - 001 B 13 4 2 7 11 2 Midale 614.5 610.1 49.52 103.40 2670-2702 2686.0 -2071.5 49.52 103.40 Winnipeg 95.0 sample in small glass bottle, Last SWAB, Feb 1/99, wtr analysis in wellfile, 1999-5235

Swab

U of A 99 - 002 B 11 16 20 6 11 2 Midale 600.7 596.2 49.49 103.44 2682-2719 2700.5 -2099.8 49.49 103.44 Winnipeg 95.0 Wellhead, after frac, Nov? 98 wellhead-company

U of A 99 - 003 B 11 16 20 6 11 2 Midale 600.7 596.2 49.49 103.44 2682-2719 2700.5 -2099.8 49.49 103.44 Winnipeg 95.0 Wellhead, after frac, Nov? 98 wellhead-company

U of A 99 - 004 31 8 16 6 11 2 Midale 596.1 591.7 49.47 103.42 2714-2738 2726.0 -2129.9 49.47 103.42 Winnipeg 95.0 wellhead-company

U of A 99 - 006 B 91 1 2 9 13 2 Hume North 612.6 608.2 49.70 103.66 hz 2425.0 -1812.4 49.70 103.66 Red River s99-05888 assumed, 90% oil, 1L wellhead-company

U of A 99 - 007 B 91 1 2 9 13 2 Hume North 612.6 608.2 49.70 103.66 hz 2425.0 -1812.4 49.70 103.66 Red River s99-05888 on bottle, 90% oil, 1L wellhead-company

U of A 99 - 008 B 91 1 2 9 13 2 Hume North 612.6 608.2 49.70 103.66 hz 2425.0 -1812.4 49.70 103.66 Red River s99-05888 on bottle, 90% oil, 1L wellhead-company

U of A 99 - 010 B 42 4 35 6 11 2 Midale 610.0 605.7 49.51 103.39 2698-2704 from Corelabs rept 2701.0 -2091.0 49.51 103.39 Winnipeg 95.0 swabs collected by Berkley, march 16/99, swab #28 Swab

U of A 99 - 097 A = dupe UofA99101

1 10 5 6 3 2 Dalesboro 593.8 589.8 49.44 102.37 932.7-935.7, 948.0-951.0 941.9 -348.1 49.44 102.37 Manville 33.0 from logs Wellhead Wellhead

U of A 99 - 150 A 1 7 36 7 21 2 Amulet 738.5 733.9 49.60 104.72 2604-2610 2607.0 -1868.5 49.60 104.72 Yeoman DST DST

U of A 99 - 151 A 1 7 36 7 21 2 Amulet 738.5 733.9 49.60 104.72 2601-2610 2605.5 -1867.0 49.60 104.72 Yeoman DST DST

U of A 99 - 153 A 21 10 3 8 5 2 Clarilaw 603.9 599.0 49.62 102.60 2326.9-2339 2333.0 -1729.1 49.62 102.60 Red River DST#2, rec 2000m water+50m mud DST

U of A 99 - 154 A 13 4 2 7 11 2 Midale 614.5 610.1 49.52 103.40 2491-2498 2494.5 -1880.0 49.52 103.40 Stony Mountain 92.0 2494.5 87.4 on DST DST#1, rec 117m( 60m WC+57m SW 290,000 tds), norwest s98-5724-5, tds 332,200

DST



m mslGround elev,

m mslKB

LatitudeKB




U of A 99 - 155 A 11 13 7 36 6 3 Cory 499.2 494.8 52.08 106.86 1380-1443 1411.5 -912.3 52.08 106.86 Deadwood 31.4 1411.5 from casing test DST#1, rec 1168m water, 24,000 tds+30m fine sand DST

U of A 99 - 156 A 11 13 7 36 6 3 Cory 499.2 494.8 52.08 106.86 1380-1699 1540.0 -1040.8 52.08 106.86 Deadwood 29.7 1540.0 from casing test DST#2, rec 1260m water, 14,000 tds+24m fine sand DST

U of A 99 - 158 B 41 10 18 5 20 2 Ceylon 767.0 761.4 49.39 104.68 2708-2714?, bottle says 2300?? 2711.0 -1944.0 49.39 104.68 Stony Mountain 79.8 2711.0 from DST#1 DST #1, rec 300m WC+46m WM+300m SW, sal 120,000 tds DST

U of A 99 - 159 A 41 10 18 5 20 2 Ceylon 767.0 761.4 49.39 104.68 2853-2866 2859.5 -2092.5 49.39 104.68 Winnipeg DST DST

U of A 99 - 160 A 32 7 2 10 9 2 Harthaven 628.5 622.5 49.79 103.12 open hole (2406-2427m) 2416.5 -1788.0 49.79 103.12 Winnipeg 88.0 2416.5 BHT+10% Wellhead- company wellhead-company

U of A 99 - 161 A 41 10 18 5 20 2 Ceylon 767.0 761.4 49.39 104.68 2763-2773 2768.0 -2001.0 49.39 104.68 Red River DST?, perfs? DST

U of A 99 - 163 A 11 3 3 9 13 2 Hume North 605.7 601.3 49.70 103.69 2443-2452 2447.5 -1841.8 49.70 103.69 Yeoman 88.4 2447.5 from DST#2 DST#3, rec 340m WC+237m water, sal 255,000 DST

U of A 99 - 165 A 41 8 14 6 6 2 Browning 601.2 597.0 49.47 102.70 2482-2505 2493.5 -1892.3 49.47 102.70 Ordovician DST, #1 DST

U of A 99 - 166 A 41 8 14 6 6 2 Browning 601.2 597.0 49.47 102.70 2482-2505 2493.5 -1892.3 49.47 102.70 Red River DST, rec 1273m gassy oil, 142m oil cut h2o DST

U of A 99 - 168 A 41 7 24 8 9 2 Stoughton 617.0 612.8 49.66 103.10 2435-2456 2445.5 -1828.5 49.66 103.10 Yeoman 92.8 2445.5 from DST DST #1, July 24/99, rec 211mWC+30m M+177m SW DST

U of A 99 - 170 A 41 7 24 8 9 2 Stoughton 617.0 612.8 49.66 103.10 2408-2422 2415.0 -1798.0 49.66 103.10 Red River 92.8 2445.5 from DST DST July 28/99, DST#4 rec 200m WC+ 1674m oil, 140m Mud DST

U of A 99 - 171 A 31 14 12 6 11 2 Midale 605.7 600.8 49.46 103.37 2629-2642 2635.5 -2029.8 49.46 103.37 Yeoman 92.0 DST#1 July 12/98, rec 100m Mud+ 183m salt water DST

U of A 99 - 172 A 31 14 12 6 11 2 Midale 605.7 600.8 49.46 103.37 2618-2628 2623.0 -2017.3 49.46 103.37 Yeoman 92.0 DST #2 July 17/98, rec 672m (500m WC+150m W(13470ppm)+ 22m Oil stained H2O)

DST

U of A 99 - 175 A 11 5 8 6 19 2 Ceylon 732.7 727.8 49.45 104.53 2702-2710 2706.0 -1973.3 49.45 104.53 Yeoman DST Mar 21/99, rec brine, from perfs? DST

U of A 99 - 176 A 41 6 5 6 19 2 Ceylon 749.0 743.3 49.44 104.53 2727.8-2733.8 2730.8 -1981.8 49.44 104.53 Yeoman DST Mar 24/99, rec brine, from perfs? DST

U of A 99 - 178 B 11 5 26 5 5 2 Steelman 595.2 591.0 49.41 102.59 2193-2214 2203.5 -1608.3 49.41 102.59 Winnipegosis 81.4 2203.5 DST#1 DST #1, Feb 16/99, rec 1479m oil, 30m salt water, invert mud!, salinity 265,000

DST

U of A 99 - 179 A 31 4 1 9 13 2 Hume 614.8 609.1 49.70 103.65 1667-1676 1671.5 -1056.7 49.70 103.65 Birdbear 70.1 1671.5 from DST DST#1, Jan 3/98, rec 216m muddy water 94,600 ppm, mud in bottle DST

U of A 99 - 180 B 41 1 27 14 12 2 Chapleau Lake 667.5 661.6 50.20 103.56 2119-2122 2120.5 -1453.0 50.20 103.56 Red River 72.5 2120.5 from 5 day buildup

Wellhead, collected by company wellhead-company

U of A 99 - 181 B 8 17 13 13 2 Tyvan 619.1 614.2 2142.3-2155.5, (group treater?) 2148.8 -1529.7 Red River ??Group Treater, collected by company, De-emulsifier may be present, June3/99

group treater-company

U of A 99 - 182 B 11 4 4 12 8 2 Corning West 659.5 655.5 49.96 103.05 2173-2178.5 (2235m on bottle?) 2175.8 -1516.3 49.96 103.05 Red River Wellhead, collected by company wellhead-company

U of A 99 - 183 A 31 12 11 12 9 2 Gooseberry Lake 647.6 642.7 49.98 103.14 2178-2184.5 2181.3 -1533.7 49.98 103.14 Red River Wellhead, collected by company wellhead-company

U of A 99 - 184 A 31 8 16 6 11 2 Midale 596.1 591.7 49.47 103.42 2714-2738 2726.0 -2129.9 49.47 103.42 Winnipeg 95.0 Wellhead, collected by company, 99/03/03 wellhead-company

U of S 96 - 09 A 2 12 21 31 21 3 Dodsland 684.8 680.8 51.67 108.93 2026.5-2049 2037.8 -1353.0 51.67 108.93 Deadwood 69.0 Wellhead, 8/1/1996 wellhead

U of S 97 - 046A 21 4 18 5 4 2 Steelman 592.2 587.8 49.38 102.54 2200-2215 2207.5 -1615.3 49.38 102.54 Winnipegosis 77.1 2207.5 from DST DST#1, rec 1150m(186m WC+100m salt DM+864m Oil stained SW) 240,000 tds

DST

U of S 97 - 060A 31 7 15 6 11 2 Midale 597.3 592.8 49.47 103.40 2629-2646 2637.5 -2040.2 49.47 103.41 Yeoman 92.0 2637.5 90.33 on DST DST#1, rec 1432m (1300m SW +132m watery mud) 115,000 ppm 4.8 m3, 497m WC,

DST

U of S 97 - 066A 41 6 16 6 9 2 Benson 603.7 599.4 49.47 103.16 2602-2609 2605.5 -2001.8 49.47 103.16 Yeoman 91.5 2605.5 from DST DST#1, rec 500m WC+ 175m salt water, 248,000 tds DST



m mslGround elev,

m mslKB

LatitudeKB




U of S 97 - 067A 41 6 16 6 9 2 Benson 603.7 599.4 49.47 103.16 2269-2276 2272.5 -1668.8 49.47 103.16 Winnipegosis 87.0 2272.5 from DST DST#2, rec 2095m salt water, sal 250,000 DST

U of S 97 - 068A 12 1 15 14 33 1 Coothill 589.6 585.7 50.18 101.91 1392-1402 1397.0 -807.4 50.18 101.91 Winnipegosis 40.7 1397.0 from DST DST#3, rec 60m distillate mud+ 1090m h2o, 200,000 tds high perm, invert?

DST

U of S 97 - 069A 12 1 15 14 33 1 Coothill 589.6 585.7 50.18 101.91 1647-1657 1652.0 -1062.4 50.18 101.91 Yeoman 44.3 1652.0 from DST DST#2, invert? 60m mud+240m salt h20, 240,000 tds DST

U of S 97 - 071A 41 4 16 6 13 2 Weyburn 580.8 576.5 49.47 103.71 2668-2674 2671.0 -2090.2 49.47 103.71 Yeoman 93.0 2671.0 from DST DST#2, rec 955m WC+577m SW @ 264,000 ppm DST

U of S 97 - 072A 41 4 16 6 13 2 Weyburn 580.8 576.5 49.47 103.71 2659-2665 2662.0 -2081.2 49.47 103.71 Yeoman 93.0 2662.0 from DST DST #3, rec 788m WC+571m Water, sal 264 ppt DST

U of S 97 - 073A 31 2 32 8 10 2 Froude 615.2 611.8 49.68 103.33 2505-2542 2523.5 -1908.3 49.69 103.33 Winnipeg DST#8, 300m cushion, 1880m salt h20, 65m M DST

U of S 97 - 074A 31 2 32 8 10 2 Froude 615.2 611.8 49.68 103.33 2185-2192 2188.5 -1573.3 49.69 103.33 Interlake DST#9, 1415m water DST

U of S 97 - 076A 41 13 2 7 11 2 Midale 610.9 605.1 49.53 103.40 1507-1530 1518.5 -907.6 49.54 103.40 Lodgepole 67.0 1518.5 65 on DST DST#2, rec 1457m water (says 1353m on bottle) sal 144 ppt high perm

DST

U of S 97 - 077A 92 2 14 8 8 2 Stoughton 618.5 614.2 49.64 102.98 2430.5-2440.4 2435.6 -1817.1 49.64 102.99 Red River rec 116m DST

U of S 97 - 078A 92 2 14 8 8 2 Stoughton 618.5 614.2 49.64 102.98 2445-2458 2451.5 -1833.0 49.64 102.99 Lake Alma rec 171m DST

U of S 97 - 079A 92 2 14 8 8 2 Stoughton 618.5 614.2 49.64 102.98 2445-2474 2459.5 -1841.0 49.64 102.99 Yeoman rec 1772m DST

U of S 97 - 080A 21 9 36 5 4 2 Willmar 594.3 590.8 49.43 102.42 2448-2474 2461.0 -1866.7 49.43 102.42 Yeoman 78.8 2461.0 from DST DST#2, rec 285m WC+715m SW[264pt]+90m mud DST

U of S 97 - 086A 41 10 12 9 12 2 Hume 610.6 606.1 49.72 103.51 2463.5-2483 2472.5 -1861.9 49.72 103.51 Yeoman 89.7 2472.5 from DST DST#1, rec 236m Wc+365m mud&Wc+208m ofw+170m ofw, DST

U of S 97 - 087A 1 6 33 13 20 2 Wilcox 585.3 581.4 50.13 104.68 2135-2142.5 2138.8 -1553.5 50.13 104.68 Red River C 65.6 2138.8 from DST DST#1, rec 20m ocm+70m oil+270m gocW, sal 180,000 DST

U of S 97 - 088A 1 6 33 13 20 2 Wilcox 585.3 581.4 50.13 104.68 2152.65-2156.35 2154.5 -1569.2 50.13 104.68 Red River C 67.9 2154.5 from DST DST#2, rec 900m (90m mW+ 810m SW) 182,000 tds DST

U of S 97 - 089A 41 11 17 9 21 2 Bures 764.5 759.4 49.74 104.82 2522-2548 2535.0 -1770.5 49.74 104.82 Yeoman 83.0 2535.0 from DST DST#1, rec 1894m (400m W, 500m mW, 994 m SW) 217,000 ppm DST

U of S 97 - 090A 11 1 33 8 13 2 Mansur 602.8 598.4 49.68 103.70 2422-2439 2430.5 -1827.7 49.68 103.70 Yeoman 93.0 2430.5 from 3 DSTs DST#3, rec 760m brackish water, sal 256,000 DST

U of S 97 - 091A 41 11 17 9 21 2 Bures 764.5 759.4 49.74 104.82 2015-2029 2022.0 -1257.5 49.74 104.82 Duperow 75.5 2022.0 from DST DST#2, rec 1930m brackish water, sal 109,600 tds DST

U of S 97 - 092A 1 14 16 7 11 2 Midale 614.7 610.1 49.56 103.44 2563-2575 2569.0 -1954.3 49.56 103.44 Yeoman 92.0 2569.0 86.7 on DST DST#1, rec 500m clean water+1060m salt water+10m mxSW, 250,000 tds

DST

U of S 97 - 094A 11 16 23 2 1 2 Glen Ewen 557.3 552.9 49.14 102.03 2273.4-2286.5 2280.0 -1722.7 49.14 102.03 Interlake 75.2 2487.0 from 2 DSTs DST#2, rec 256m WC+ 28m oilyWC+ 142m gassy mud+30m gassy water+oil+mud (ran 400m wc??)

DST

U of S 97 - 099 47.92 108.53 grab sample 0.0 0.0 47.92 108.53 surface 5.0 Alder Gulch sample may 8/97 surface

U of S 97 - 101 47.92 108.53 grab sample 0.0 0.0 47.92 108.53 surface 5.0 Zortman Toilet water May 8/97 surface

U of S 99 - 001 A 1 6 33 14 1 2 Wapella 601.4 598.6 50.21 102.09 co-produced, 638.25-638.86, 676.66-690.68, 749.2-750.42

694.3 -92.9 50.21 102.09 Wapella+Jurassic 29.0 775.0 BHT from 2 logs Wellhead wellhead - Miller

U of S 99 - 002 A 41 5 4 15 1 2 Wapella 599.6 595.6 50.23 102.09 645-646.2 645.6 -46.0 50.23 102.09 Mannville 28.0 BHTcorrected for depth

Wellhead wellhead - Miller

U of S 99 - 003 A 41 4 33 14 1 2 Wapella 603.1 600.1 50.21 102.09 676-677.2 676.6 -73.5 50.21 102.09 Mannville 28.0 779.0 bht from log Wellhead wellhead - Miller

U of S 99 - 004 A 1 7 33 14 1 2 Wapella 606.9 604.4 50.21 102.08 co-produced, 682.14-683.36 + 754.08-757.12

719.6 -112.8 50.21 102.08 Wapella+Jurassic 32.0 774.0 BHT from log Wellhead wellhead - Miller



m mslGround elev,

m mslKB

LatitudeKB




U of S 99 - 005A 91 5 32 13 32 1 Red Jacket 585.2 581.9 50.14 101.84 723-729 md, 667.4-672.5 tvd 670.0 -84.8 50.14 101.84 Upper Shaunavon (Red Jacket Sand)

28.0 670.0 3 day buildup Wellhead wellhead - Miller

U of S 99 - 006A 1 13 8 13 32 1 Red Jacket S 588.5 584.1 50.09 101.83 702-705 704.5 -116.0 50.09 101.83 Red Jacket 29.4 703.5 2 DST's Wellhead wellhead - Miller

U of S 99 - 008 12 18 12 29 1 Manitoba 50.01 101.44 50.01 101.44 Souris Valley Wellhead wellhead - Miller

U of S 99 - 009 21 15 13 15 1 2 Wapella 593.2 589.2 50.25 102.02 670.2-672.2 671.2 -78.0 50.25 102.02 Red Jacket 29.8 3 day buildup Wellhead wellhead - Miller

U of S 99 - 010 21 13 13 15 1 2 Wapella 593.2 589.2 50.26 102.03 671-680 from Dan Khan 675.5 -82.3 50.26 102.03 Red Jacket or Mannville 34.0 BHT+10% Wellhead wellhead - Miller

U of S 99 - 011 41 1 16 15 31 1 Welwyn 543.0 538.7 50.27 101.69 724-726 725.0 -182.0 50.27 101.69 Bakken 38.0 BHT+10% from nearby well

Wellhead wellhead -

Documents

Economic Potential of Formation Brines: Interim Results from the … · 2019. 1. 4. · Saskatchewan Geological Survey 1 Summary of Investigations 2002, Volume 2 Economic Potential