25
Economic Impacts of Population Change After Malaria Eradication Conference on Health Improvements for Economic Growth Cambridge, Massachusetts May 30, 2007 Gretchen Donehower UC Berkeley Department of Demography

Economic Impacts of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

  • Upload
    creda

  • View
    55

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Economic Impacts of Population Change After Malaria Eradication. Conference on Health Improvements for Economic Growth Cambridge, Massachusetts May 30, 2007 Gretchen Donehower UC Berkeley Department of Demography. Outline. Review demographic scenarios - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Economic Impacts of Population Change

After Malaria Eradication

Conference on Health Improvements for Economic Growth

Cambridge, Massachusetts

May 30, 2007

Gretchen Donehower

UC Berkeley Department of Demography

Page 2: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Outline

• Review demographic scenarios

• Introduce model linking population inputs with economic outputs

• Examine economic outcomes under different population scenarios

• Discuss implications and other possible linkages

Page 3: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Demographic Scenarios - Mortality

Probability of Death in Interval (nqx), Zambia Population Scenarios

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0-4

5 - 9

10 -

14

15 -

19

20 -

24

25 -

29

30 -

34

35 -

39

40 -

44

45 -

49

50 -

54

55 -

59

60 -

64

65 -

69

70 -

74

75 -

79

80 -

84

85 -

89

90 -

94

95 -

9910

0+

Age

Pro

ba

bili

ty o

f De

ath

in A

ge

Inte

rva

l (n

qx)

Before Malaria EradicationAfter Malaria Eradication

Page 4: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Demographic Scenarios - Mortality

Large mortality reduction at youngest ages

Probability of Death in Interval (nqx), Zambia Population Scenarios

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0-4

5 - 9

10 -

14

15 -

19

20 -

24

25 -

29

30 -

34

35 -

39

40 -

44

45 -

49

50 -

54

55 -

59

60 -

64

65 -

69

70 -

74

75 -

79

80 -

84

85 -

89

90 -

94

95 -

9910

0+

Age

Pro

ba

bili

ty o

f De

ath

in A

ge

Inte

rva

l (n

qx)

Before Malaria EradicationAfter Malaria Eradication

Page 5: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Demographic Scenarios - Mortality

Much smaller reductions at older ages

Probability of Death in Interval (nqx), Zambia Population Scenarios

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0-4

5 - 9

10 -

14

15 -

19

20 -

24

25 -

29

30 -

34

35 -

39

40 -

44

45 -

49

50 -

54

55 -

59

60 -

64

65 -

69

70 -

74

75 -

79

80 -

84

85 -

89

90 -

94

95 -

9910

0+

Age

Pro

ba

bili

ty o

f De

ath

in A

ge

Inte

rva

l (n

qx)

Before Malaria EradicationAfter Malaria Eradication

Page 6: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Demographic Scenarios - Fertility

Difference of 0.18 births per woman

Page 7: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Demographic Scenarios - Fertility

Page 8: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Demographic Scenarios - Age Structure

Page 9: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Demographic Scenarios - Age Structure

Initial impact: younger population due to more

child survival

Page 10: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Demographic Scenarios - Age Structure

Eventual impact: older population due to

lower fertility

Page 11: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Demographic Scenarios - Population Growth

Population Growth Rates

0.000

0.004

0.008

0.012

0.016

0.020

2005 2030 2055 2080 2105

Year

An

nu

aliz

ed

Gro

wth

Ra

tes

Before Malaria Eradication

After Malaria Eradication

Page 12: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Model Motivation

• Hold institutional setting fixed– care of young dependents by family and

government– care of elderly dependents by family, government

and own saving

• Use what we have learned in the National Transfer Accounts (www.ntaccounts.org) project about the age-shape of economic activity in different types of countries

Page 13: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Model

• Cross-sectional profiles of labor income (Yl) and consumption (C) have fixed shape– but levels change over time

• Aggregate lifecycle wealth (W) for adults determined by the profiles and population: – W=PV(C) - PV(Yl)

• Lifecycle wealth held as W=A+ Tp+ Tk:– assets (A)

– transfer obligations from gov’t and own children (Tp)

– transfer obligations to children (Tk)

Page 14: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Model (continued)

• Key assumptions– Assets and transfers are constant fraction of pension

wealth (Wp=A+Tp)

• Tp(t) = Wp(t)

• A(t) = (1-) Wp(t)

– Level of Yl profiles determined by economic growth in open economy.

• With these assumptions, we can solve for levels of C profiles over time, backwards from steady state with stable population

Page 15: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Model Inputs

Profiles of Consumption and Labor IncomeIndonesia 1996, Modified

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Age

Pro

file

Re

lativ

e to

Ave

rag

e Y

l, a

ge

30

-49 Labor Income

Consumption

Alternate Labor Income Profile(higher child labor force participation)

`

Page 16: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Model Inputs (continued)

• Productivity growth 1.5%• Depreciation rate 3%• Discount rate 3%• Interest rate 5%

• Family share of 0.67transfers to children

• Transfers as a share 0.80of pension wealth ()

Page 17: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Model Inputs (continued)

• Baseline and malaria eradication scenarios use these profiles and inputs

• Additional simulation includes change in female labor force participation (LFP)– female LFP increases as fertility declines, proportional

to decline beyond baseline

– assumes a birth takes a woman out of the labor force for one year

– with fewer births, age-specific increase in Yl profile over time

Page 18: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Model Inputs (continued)

Support Ratio:

ratio of population weighted by labor income profile to population weighted by consumption profile

Support Ratios

0.88

0.90

0.92

0.94

0.96

0.98

1.00

1.02

1.04

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120

Year

Effe

ctiv

e P

rod

uce

rs P

er

Effe

ctiv

e C

on

sum

er

Before Malaria Eradication

After Malaria Eradication

Additional Increase in Female LFP

Page 19: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Model Outputs

Saving

0.000

0.001

0.002

0.003

0.004

0.005

0.006

0.007

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120

Year

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f To

tal O

utp

ut S

ave

d

Before Malaria Eradication

After Malaria Eradication

Additional Increase in Female LFP

Page 20: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Model Outputs

Saving

0.000

0.001

0.002

0.003

0.004

0.005

0.006

0.007

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120

Year

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f To

tal O

utp

ut S

ave

d

Before Malaria Eradication

After Malaria Eradication

Additional Increase in Female LFP After Malaria Eradication:

Greater saving by adults required to pay for faster population growth and more young dependents.

Page 21: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Model Outputs (continued)

Assets

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120

Year

Ass

ets

pe

r D

olla

r o

f La

bo

r In

com

e

Before Malaria Eradication

After Malaria Eradication

Additional Increase in Female LFP

Page 22: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Model Outputs (continued)

Assets

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120

Year

Ass

ets

pe

r D

olla

r o

f La

bo

r In

com

e

Before Malaria Eradication

After Malaria Eradication

Additional Increase in Female LFP

After Malaria Eradication:

Greater assets accumulated between period of initial higher saving and period of population aging.

Page 23: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Model Outputs (continued)

Differences from baseline (before malaria eradication) are very small.

GDP Per CapitaRelative to Baseline Scenario

0.985

0.990

0.995

1.000

1.005

1.010

2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120

Year

Alte

rna

tive

/ B

ase

line

GD

P P

er

Ca

pita

After Malaria Eradication

Additional Increase in Female LFP

Page 24: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Review of Results

• In the near term, small strain on per capita resources; in the long term, small gains are realized.

• Changes in model inputs have very strong influence on outcome levels, but not on difference from baseline.

• Other potential positive effects likely to have larger impacts than population age structure or growth rate.

Page 25: Economic Impacts  of Population Change After Malaria Eradication

Acknowledgements

• The National Transfer Accounts project received core funding from the National Institutes of Health, NIA, R01-AG025488 and NIA, R37-AG025247, principal investigators Ron Lee and Andy Mason.