37
Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1

Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Econ 1900 Laura Lamb

1

Page 2: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

1. Perfect competition

2. Monopolistic competition

3. Oligopoly

4. Pure Monopoly

2

Page 3: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

What are the major characteristics of each market model?

3

Page 4: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Large number of firms

Standardized products

Price takers

Easy entry & exit of firms

4

Page 5: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Then why do we study it?

◦ helps analyze industries with characteristics similar to perfect competition.

◦ provides a context in which to apply revenue and cost concepts developed in previous chapters.

◦ provides a norm or standard against which to compare and evaluate the efficiency of the real world.

5

Page 6: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Demand is perfectly elastic for each firm◦ Not for the industry◦ Individual firms can sell as much as they want at

the market price

6

Page 7: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Average Revenue

Total Revenue

Marginal Revenue

7

Page 8: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Product price Quantity Demanded

Total Revenue Marginal Revenue

8888888

0123456

8

Page 9: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

1. Compare total revenue & total cost

2. Compare marginal revenue & marginal cost

9

Page 10: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Consider the Maple Syrup Market: The North American maple syrup market

produces nearly 30 million litres/year. More than 80% is produced in Canada. The number of firms can only be estimate because some are very small and sell their output in a small local market. There are about 9,500 producers in Canada & about 2,000 in the US.

  Maple syrup is not quite a standardized good,

but is close. At the wholesale level, the market is highly competitive and a good example for perfect competition.

10

Page 11: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Total Revenue & Total Cost Schedule for Dave’s Maple Syrup

Quantity (cans/day)

Total Revenue ($/day)

Total cost ($/day)

Economic profit($/day)

01234567891011121314

081624324048566472808896

104112

15222730323334363944516076

104144

-15-14-11-607142025282928200

-3211

Page 12: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Where is the break-even point?

How do we describe the profit at this point?

12

Page 13: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

MR = MC rule: in the short run, a firm will maximize profit by producing at the output level where MR = MC.

13

Page 14: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Quantity (cans/day)

Total Revenue$/day

MR$/day

Total Cost$/day

MC$/day

Economic Profit

8

9

10

11

12

64

72

80

88

96

8

8

8

8

39

44

51

60

76

5

7

9

16

25

28

29

28

20

14

Page 15: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

 

***The MR=MC rule is applicable to all market models***

15

Page 16: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Note: for perfectly competitive firms: MR = MC is equivalent to P= MC

Why?

16

Page 17: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

1. If average cost is $8/can, what is the economic profit?

2. Suppose the price dropped from $8/can to $6/can, how would the profit maximizing level of output change?

3. Now suppose, the price drops to $4/can. How much should Dave produce?

17

Page 18: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Quantity (cans/day)

Total revenue

($/day)

MR ($/day) Total cost

($/day)

MC ($/day) Economic profit

(TR-TC)

7

8

9

10

11

12

28

32

35

40

44

48

4

4

4

4

4

36

39

44

51

60

76

3

5

7

9

16

-8

-7

-8

-11

-16

-28

18

Page 19: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

If a loss is incurred, the firm should continue to produce as long as the price is greater than average variable cost (AVC).

Modified rule: MR = MC if P>minimum AVC

19

Page 20: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

In the example of Dave’s Maple Syrup: when P=$8, quantity supplied = 10 when P=$4, quantity supplied = 8

◦ appears rational in light of the law of supply!

◦ The short-run supply curve is the section of the MC curve starting at minimum AVC (and above).

20

Page 21: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

In what situations would the supply curve for the firm shift?

21

Page 22: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Quantity supplied by 1 firm

Total quantity supplied by 1000 firms

Product price Total quantity demanded

10865

10,0008,0006,0005,000

8421

3,0005,0006,00010,000

22

Page 23: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Is the industry profitable at the equilibrium?

23

Page 24: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

1. The firm should produce is P≥minimum AVC

2. The firm should produce the quantity at MR=MC

24

Page 25: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Individual firms must take price as given, but the supply plans of all competitive producers as a group are a major determinant of product price.

25

Page 26: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Assumptions:1.Entry and exit of firms are the only long‑run

adjustments 2.Firms in the industry have identical cost

curves.3.The industry is a constant‑cost industry

the entry and exit of firms will not affect resource prices or location of unit‑cost schedules for individual firms.

26

Page 27: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

**In the long run, product price = minimum ATC

27

Page 28: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

If P>minimum ATC →economic profits will attract new firms to the industry →increased supply of the product →price is driven down to minimum ATC.

If P<minimum ATC →economic losses will cause some firms to leave the industry →decreased supply of the product →price is driven up to minimum ATC.

28

Page 29: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

A change in consumer tastes increases the demand for product

trace the steps to a new long-run equilibrium

Illustrate with two graphs, one for the firm and one for the industry.

29

Page 30: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Household income decreases causing a fall in demand for the product.

trace the steps to a new long-run equilibrium

Illustrate with two graphs, one for the firm and one for the industry.

30

Page 31: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

**In the long run, equilibrium price & quantity always occur where ATC is at a minimum for a perfectly competitive firm.

31

Page 32: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

The product price will be exactly equal to each firm’s point of minimum average total cost.

32

Page 33: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Perfectly elastic ◦ Level of output does not affect price in the long-

run.

33

Page 34: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Upward sloping as industry expands output.

34

Page 35: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

Downward sloping as the industry expands output.

35

Page 36: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

In the long run:◦ Productive efficiency occurs where P = minimum

ATC

◦ Allocative efficiency occurs where P = MC allocative efficiency implies maximum consumer and

producer surplus.

36

Page 37: Econ 1900 Laura Lamb 1. 1. Perfect competition 2. Monopolistic competition 3. Oligopoly 4. Pure Monopoly 2

When a pharmaceutical company introduces a new drug, it typically owns the patent and can price and produce as a monopolist, earning economic profits.

When patent rights expire, firms pursuing economic profits enter the market for that drug.

Prices of these drugs typically drop 30-40 percent. ◦ Those lower prices increase efficiency and consumer

surplus.

37