Upload
alexina-fleming
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ecology Lecture 10Ecology Lecture 10
Life History Patterns 1
Topics covered (both Life Topics covered (both Life History Lectures)History Lectures)
Sexual selection What criteria do individuals use to choose
mates?
Mating systems How many mates does an individual have What factors determine this?
Parental care/parental investment in offspring
Allocation of resources Quick reproduction vs. growth & long life (r
and K strategists, etc…)
Relevance to Population Relevance to Population EcologyEcology
Life-history characteristics determine Organization of individuals in space and time
Examples…
How the population perpetuates itself discretely vs. continuously; rapidly vs. slowly, etc…
Which characteristics will be selected for and persist within the population (due to sexual selection)
Conversely, selective pressures (abiotic factors, distribution of resources, etc..) will affect the life-history patterns observed
Sexual selectionSexual selection
Defined: Selection for characteristics/behaviors
that maximize chances of mating and producing the most, and highest quality, offspring.
A category within “natural selection” General pattern: Male-male
competition and female choice Common pattern with many
exceptions!
Example: Satin bowerbird Example: Satin bowerbird mating behaviormating behavior
Each male build an elaborate bower where he conducts his courtship display
Bowers located near each other
Each female visits several times, finally chooses a mate
Bowerbird males: # of Bowerbird males: # of matesmates
Some males much more successful than others
Bowerbird females: # of Bowerbird females: # of matesmates
Only ~1/3 of females have >1 mate
Why do males usually Why do males usually compete, while females compete, while females
choose?choose? Hypothesis 1, A.J. Bateman: “Eggs are
expensive, sperm is cheap!”
Amount of energy invested in a single gamete is much greater for females (eggs) than for males (sperm) Female bird may
invest up to 30% of body weight in eggs.
““Eggs are expensive, Eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap.”sperm is cheap.”
Difference in investment per gamete Example: Fairy wrens
Males have 8 billion sperm in testes at once Females lay six eggs maximum per clutch
Female limited by egg production, Male limited by number of mates
only (presumably unlimited sperm) Operational sex ratio skewed
toward males
Is sperm really cheap?Is sperm really cheap?
It often takes a large number of sperm to fertilize a single egg, due to
Hostile environment within female Acid Attacks by the immune system
Is sperm really cheap?Is sperm really cheap?
Sperm competition among males Occurs when females have multiple
mates Possibly the predominant situation Fitness advantages for female (will explore in
next lecture)
Some males may actually run out of sperm… Garter snakes, zebra finch, blue crabs,
rams…
What if there is no sperm What if there is no sperm competition?competition?
In sea horses, eggs are deposited into pouches, and there is not sperm competition. Why not?
Male sea horses have relatively low sperm counts!
Is sperm really cheap?Is sperm really cheap?
Drosophila bifurca: one sperm with long tail Sperm tail is 20x
length of his body His testes make up
11% of his body mass.
Why do males usually Why do males usually compete, while females compete, while females
choose?choose? Hypothesis 2 (R.
Trivers): Competition vs. choice is based on individual with the most total parental investment
Often the female (example: mammals)
But in some species, male makes a greater total investment
Gulf pipefishGulf pipefish
While male cares for a single brood, a female can produce two clutches of eggs male has greater total parental investment Operational sex ratio skewed toward females.
Males choose large, ( ornamented females over small, drab ones.
Female
Male
Types of sexual selectionTypes of sexual selection
Intrasexual selection: maintenance of traits that assist in competition within the gender successful mating
Intersexual selection: maintenance of traits that are attractive to the opposite gender
Intrasexual selection 1: Intrasexual selection 1: Adaptations to gain access to Adaptations to gain access to
femalesfemales
Dominance behavior & characteristics Example 1: sexual dimorphism in
elephant seals
Male-male competition and sexual Male-male competition and sexual dimorphism (seals)dimorphism (seals)
Male dung beetle, Phanaeus vindex (Rattlebox photography)
Intrasexual selection 1: Intrasexual selection 1: Adaptations to gain access to Adaptations to gain access to
femalesfemales Weaponry for fighting with other males.
Example: dung beetle!
IntraIntrasexual selection 1: sexual selection 1: Adaptations to gain access to Adaptations to gain access to
femalesfemales Sneaker
strategies Example 1: Plainfin
midshipmen Dominant male
features and behavior Nest building, singing,
guarding Sneaker male features
and behavior No nest, no singing,
just sex… Small fish, big balls!
Dung beetles: two Dung beetles: two morphsmorphs
Behavioral and morphologial differences similar to midshipmen Large, dominant males with
horns defend burrows Small, hornless males with
“big balls” sneak Midshipmen
Genetically-based differences Dung beetles
Nutritionally-based differences
Intrasexual selection 2: Intrasexual selection 2: Adaptations favoring the use of one’s Adaptations favoring the use of one’s
spermsperm
Displacing or inactivating rival sperm Damselfly “scooper” penis
Intrasexual selection 2: Intrasexual selection 2: Adaptations favoring the use of one’s Adaptations favoring the use of one’s
spermsperm
Displacing or inactivating rival sperm Example: Chemical sperm inactivation in
fruit flies
Photo: San Francisco Exploratorium
Intrasexual selection 2: Intrasexual selection 2: Adaptations favoring the use of one’s Adaptations favoring the use of one’s
spermsperm
Mechanisms to avoid sperm displacement Mate guarding
(Example: many crab species)
Intrasexual selection 2: Intrasexual selection 2: Adaptations favoring the use of one’s Adaptations favoring the use of one’s
spermsperm
Mechanisms to avoid sperm displacement Prolonged mating and cannibalism (example: redback
spider)
Female less likely to mate with another if she eats him
He has low likelihood of finding a new mate (high predation) Andrade, 1996
Intrasexual selection 2: Intrasexual selection 2: Adaptations favoring the use of one’s Adaptations favoring the use of one’s
spermsperm
Mechanisms to avoid sperm displacement Anti-aphrodisiac (Example: Heliconius erato)
InterIntersexual selectionsexual selectionFocus on female choiceFocus on female choice
Material benefits: Nutrition Ex: hangflies) Length of mating time depends on quality and size
of “courtship gift”
InterIntersexual selectionsexual selectionFocus on female choiceFocus on female choice
Material benefits: Anti-predator substances Defensive compounds in arctiid moths
Photo: butterfly-conservation.org
InterIntersexual selectionsexual selectionFocus on female choiceFocus on female choice
Ability of males to provide sufficient sperm Female fruit flies (some species) choose virgin males
Photo: San Francisco Exploratorium
InterIntersexual selectionsexual selectionFocus on female choiceFocus on female choice
Parental ability Cannot assess
directly May be correlated
with other features of the male
Example 1: Redwing blackbird “Epaulettes” correlated
with nest defense Courtship effort
correlated with feeding effort
Photo: Vancouverislandbirds.com
InterIntersexual selectionsexual selectionFocus on female choiceFocus on female choice
Parental ability (Ex: sedge warbler) Size of song repertoire correlates with chick
weight at fledging
Sedge warbler (cont.)Sedge warbler (cont.)
Female sedge warblers choose on the basis of repertoire size. Thus they choose
the most fit males
InterIntersexual selectionsexual selectionFocus on female choiceFocus on female choice
Health/Genetic quality Example: song repertoire in great reed warbler Females chose males with larger repertoires This was correlated with greater offspring
survival (unrelated to parental care)
InterIntersexual selectionsexual selectionFocus on female choiceFocus on female choice
Health/Genetic quality Example: Bright coloration of sticklebacks
negatively correlated with low parasite loads
InterIntersexual selectionsexual selectionFocus on female choiceFocus on female choice
Health/Genetic quality (bright color negatively correlated with parasite load) Advantages to females choosing these
males Avoid getting parasites while mating Avoid transferring parasites to young Are choosing healthier males; their health
status may be related to “genetic quality”
Satin Bowerbirds: multiple signals Satin Bowerbirds: multiple signals of health and fitness (and good of health and fitness (and good
genes?)genes?)
Origin/maintenance of mate Origin/maintenance of mate choice for “exaggerated” choice for “exaggerated”
characteristicscharacteristics In some species, why do males
develop what appear to be extreme traits that actually can hamper their survival?
Example: Peacock’s tail
Origin/maintenance of mate Origin/maintenance of mate choice for “exaggerated” choice for “exaggerated”
characteristicscharacteristics Hypothesis 1: Runaway selection
(R.A. Fisher) Directional that takes on a life of its own
Starts as an “honest signal” more extreme. Mechanism: Females choose males with
large tails, multiple eyespots. the next generation has a higher proportion of these males. Will work even if his traits are not honest signals of
quality. Why? Evidence of arbitrary choices by females (bird band
example)
Origin/maintenance of mate Origin/maintenance of mate choice for “exaggerated” choice for “exaggerated”
characteristicscharacteristics Hypothesis 2: Handicap or “good
genes” hypothesis (R.A. Fisher) Exaggerated trait might decrease chance
of survival, only males with superior genes can survive despite the handicap Example: peacock tail as a handicap.
In this case, a female choosing a male with these traits would be improving her fitness. (His signal is an “honest signal” of fitness.)
Distinguishing between Runaway Distinguishing between Runaway Selection and “Good Genes” Selection and “Good Genes”
(Petrie)(Petrie)
Methods Males of different ornamentation/tail length
and randomly bred them with females Why random?
Young raised under identical conditions and then released
Results Offspring of the “attractive” males weighed
more at day 84. Offspring of the attractive males were more
likely to be alive after two years Which hypothesis is supported by
this data?
Petrie’s peacock dataPetrie’s peacock data
Origin/maintenance of mate Origin/maintenance of mate choice for “exaggerated” choice for “exaggerated”
characteristicscharacteristics How extreme can a
characteristic become? Under what conditions will directional selection stop? (Think about costs vs. benefits…)