32
Ecology B. Species Interactions 1. Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2. Interspecies competition

Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

EcologyB. Species Interactions

1. Intraspecific competition• Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins

• Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs

2. Interspecies competition

Page 2: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

EcologyB. Species Interactions

2. Interspecific competition – Competitive exclusion

Page 3: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

EcologyB. Species Interactions

3. Predation• Natural selection favors increased predation efficiency• Predators can control prey populations (Top-down)

• Reduce competition/competitive exclusion• Prey can control predator populations (Bottom-up)

• Prey = food• Some prey have evolved defense mechanisms

• Ex – Spines in plankton• Ex – Poisonous chemicals in algae and mollusks

• Some defenses are inducible• Ex – Barnacles grow upright when predatory snails absent and horizontally when snails present• Ex – Algae produce more bad-tasting chemicals after being damaged

• Coevolution – Evolutionary “arms race”

Page 4: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

EcologyB. Species Interactions

3. Predation• Natural selection favors increased predation efficiency

• Predators can control prey populations (Top-down)

• Reduce competition/competitive exclusion

• Prey can control predator populations (Bottom-up)

• Prey = food

Page 5: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

EcologyB. Species Interactions

3. Predation• Some prey have evolved defense mechanisms

• Ex – Spines in plankton

• Ex – Poisonous chemicals in algae and mollusks

• Some defenses are inducible

• Ex – Barnacles grow upright when predatory snails absent and horizontally when snails present

• Ex – Algae produce more bad-tasting chemicals after being damaged

• Coevolution – Evolutionary “arms race”

Page 6: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

EcologyB. Species Interactions

4. Symbiosis• Relationship between host and symbiont

a. Commensalism• One partner benefits, other unaffected• Ex – Barnacles living on whale

b. Parasitism• One partner benefits at expense of other• Common in marine environment• Ex – Tapeworm in whale

c. Mutualism• Both partners benefit• Ex – Cleaner wrasses and shrimps on coral reefs• Ex – Anemonefishes and anemones

Page 7: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

EcologyC. Trophic Structures

• Energy and matter flow through ecosystems can be described through trophic relationships

• Relationships between producers and consumers = food chain

Page 8: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

EcologyC. Trophic Structures

• Food chains are often simplistic – alternative is a food web

Page 9: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

EcologyC. Trophic Structures

• Food chains are often simplistic – alternative is a food web

Page 10: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

EcologyC. Trophic Structures

• Energy transfer between trophic levels not 100% efficient• Matter consumed by metabolism

• Energy released as heat

• Matter released as waste

• Transfer efficiency ~ 10% (5-20%)

Page 11: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

EcologyC. Trophic Structures

• Energy transfer can be illustrated as pyramid of energy• Higher levels contain progressively less energy

Page 12: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

EcologyC. Trophic Structures

• Energy transfer can be illustrated as pyramid of energy• Higher levels contain progressively less energy

Page 13: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

EcologyC. Trophic Structures

• Decomposers – break down waste products

Page 14: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

• Seafood is ~1% of all food eaten worldwide

• Seafood especially important in poor coastal nations with low protein availability

• World seafood catch stabilized by late 1980s

Page 15: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

Page 16: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

Page 17: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

Page 18: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

Page 19: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

Page 20: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

1. Clupeoid fishes• Herrings, sardines, anchovies, menhadens, shads• Feed on plankton (use gill rakers)• Form large schools over continental shelves and in upwelling zones

• Caught with purse seines• Industrial fisheries

- Fish meal (protein supplement in animal feed)

- Fish oil (margarine, cosmetics, paint)

- Fish flour (protein supplement for humans)

- Fertilizers

- Pet food

Page 21: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

1. Clupeoid fishes

Page 22: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

Page 23: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

2. Cods and related fishes• Cods, pollock, haddock, hakes, whiting

• Demersal and benthopelagic cold-water fishes

• Caught with bottom trawls

• Grand Banks (Newfoundland), Georges Bank (New England) and North Sea supported extensive cod fisheries until 1992, 1994, and 2001, respectively

• Cod populations crashed; catches plummeted

• Ex – North Sea catch

• 1971 – 277,000 tonnes

• 2001 – 59,000 tonnes

Page 24: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

Page 25: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

Page 26: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

3. Tunas• Skipjack, yellowfin, albacore, bigeye, bluefin

• Primarily eaten in affluent countries

• Can be very expensive (up to $40,000 for a choice bluefin in Tokyo)

• Highly migratory species

• Caught with purse seines, longlines, gill nets, rod and reel

• Often associate with floating objects, dolphin schools

• Juveniles caught in purse seines may be finished in net pens (aquaculture)

Page 27: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

3. Tunas

Page 28: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

Page 29: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

4. Other species• Flatfishes, rockfishes, mackerels, salmon

• Mostly coastal

• Threatened by coastal pollution, damming of rivers (salmon), overfishing

• Flatfishes and rockfishes harvested extensively in US

• Salmon farmed heavily in Canada, Chile

• Non-finfish

• Squid, octopus

• Clams, oysters, scallops

• Crabs, lobsters

• Sea urchin, sea cucumber

• Barnacles, jellyfish

• Sea turtles, seals, whales

Page 30: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

5. Fishery Yields

Page 31: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

5. Fishery Yields

• Overfishing leads to1) Stock depletion

2) Reduced catch rate

3) Capture of smaller individuals

4) Unsustainable harvest

• Biological – Can’t reproduce fast enough

• Economic – Can’t catch enough to make a profit

Page 32: Ecology B.Species Interactions 1.Intraspecific competition Ex – Competition for algae by sea urchins Ex – Competition for shells by hermit crabs 2.Interspecies

Marine ResourcesA. Fisheries

5. Fishery Yields