32
Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of Vermont

Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Ecological Economics and Sustainability

Joshua FarleyCommunity Development and Applied

EconomicsGund Institute for Ecological Economics

University of Vermont

Page 2: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Economies as Evolutionary Systems

Hunter gatherer economy (Pleistocene) Egalitarian cooperation

Agricultural economy (Holocene) Private property rights (limited) Capture of surplus, hierarchy structures

Industrial economy (Anthropocene) Fossil fuels and competition Scarcity of natural capital

Page 3: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Economy in the Anthropocene

Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., McNeill, J., 2011. The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369, 842-867.

Page 4: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Economy in the Anthropocene

Page 5: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Nature in the Anthropocene

Page 6: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Nature in the Anthropocene

Page 7: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Societal Challenges in the Anthropocene

Just and sustainable degrowth

Page 8: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Transition to Sustainability

Page 9: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Transition to Sustainability

Marginal market costs(Market supply curve)

Poor people have no demand

Page 10: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Limits to throughput Just distribution Incentives to produce necessary

technologies

Transition to Sustainability

Page 11: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Changing the Paradigm

Page 12: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Conventional Economics

Exponential Growth Ecosystem as part Scarcity, markets

and feedback loops Substitutability Energy and

resources? Production

functions Circular economy

Page 13: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Weak Sustainability Schelling (Nobel Memorial Prize in 2005):

“Agriculture and Forestry are less than 3% of total output, and little else is much affected. Even if agricultural productivity declined by a third over the next half century, the per capita GNP we might have achieved by 2050 we would still achieve in 2051.”

Page 14: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Ecological Economic View

Economy is sustained and contained by global ecosystem

Relative scarcity has changed dramatically

Economic institutions must adapt

Page 15: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Laws of Physics Can’t make something

from nothing or vice versa

Can’t do work without energy

Disorder increases

Page 16: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Laws of ecology Conversion of ecosystem structure into

economic products and waste degrades and destroys ecosystem services Time lags common

Both economic products and ecosystem services essential to civilization

Page 17: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Strong Sustainability

“If the biota, in the course of aeons, has built something we like but do not understand, then who but a fool would discard seemingly useless parts? To keep every cog and wheel is the first precaution of intelligent tinkering.”

Aldo Leopold

Page 18: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Price Mechanism Fails

Ecosystem Services: can’t be owned Information: value maximized when

free

Page 19: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Changing the Goals

Page 20: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

From micro-allocation and maximizing monetary value

Micro-allocation: How do we allocate natural capital among the

production of different economic goods and services?

Satisfaction of subjective preferences Preferences weighted by purchasing power Maximize monetary value

Food and eflornithine

Page 21: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

…To macroallocation and Sustainable Scale

How much ecosystem structure should be: converted to economic production conserved to generate essential

ecosystem services? How large an economy and how

many people can our ecosystems sustain?

Page 22: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

…Just Distribution

Between species How much of the planet’s net primary

productivity should we take for ourselves? Between generations

What are our obligations to future generations?

Within a generation Who is entitled to resources created by

nature and society as a whole?

Page 23: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

… and Efficient Allocation

Once we’ve achieved a sustainable and just economy, how can we maximize human well-being from available resources?

Solving prisoner’s dilemmas

Page 24: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Changing the Rules

Page 25: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Rules for Sustainability

Extract renewable resources no faster than they can regenerate Restore depleted stocks

Extract essential non-renewable resources no faster than we develop renewable substitute Energy sector invests .3% of revenue in R&D

Emit waste no faster than it can be absorbed Emissions below absorption rates when

waste stocks are excessive, e.g. CO2

Page 26: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Rules for Sustainability

Neither extraction nor emission can threaten critical ecosystem services

Steady state population

Page 27: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Rules for Justice

We cannot grow our way out of poverty Poverty is higher now than in 1969,

when per capita GNP was ½ of today’s Resources created by nature and

society as a whole should be shared Basic needs must trump luxury

Page 28: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Rules for Efficiency

How we allocate depends on desirable ends, characteristics of scarce resources Economics cannot be faith-based

Non-excludable: markets cannot work, cooperation required

Non-rival: markets inefficient, cooperation required

Most ecosystem services are non-rival

Page 29: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Efficiency: Prisoner’s Dilemmas

Global Climate Change Natural resource

depletion/biodiversity loss Green technology

Minimize cost of producing information Maximize value once it exists

Cooperation is necessary Mathematical biology, behavioral

economics, political theory, anthropology, evolution all agree

Page 30: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Institutions for Cooperation

Institutions can make generous people act selfishly, or selfish people act generously

Reciprocity or payments? Market economy makes people selfish Social economy promotes reciprocity Mixing the two fails

Social norms: glorify greed or punish it?

Page 31: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Conclusions Markets emerged simultaneously with fossil

fuels Nature of ‘scarce’ resources has changed

from rival, excludable to non-rival and/or non-excludable

Cannot transform physical characteristics of resources to fit market model

Must adapt economic system to resource characteristics, human behavior Prisoner’s dilemmas Physiological necessities

Cooperation and common ownership for sustainability

Page 32: Ecological Economics and Sustainability Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University of

Evolution of Cooperation

Genetic Multi-level selection

Distribution of pro-social behavior Bacteria, slime-molds, insects, fish, humans

(super cooperators) Oxytocin Detecting cheaters

Cultural Altruistic punishment Punishing non-punishers Group identity