EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND 2014 GRAVEL

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND

GRAVEL EXTENSION – PLANNING STATEMENT

2014

1

CEMEX UK MATERIALS LTD

APPLICATION TO CONSOLIDATE PREVIOUS PLANNING PERMIS SIONS AND EXTENSION OF

EXISTING QUARRY INVOLVING THE EXTRACTION OF SAND AN D GRAVEL WITH RESTORATION

TO AGRICULTURE AND CONSERVATION WETLAND, RETENTION OF EXISTING AGGREGATE

PROCESSING PLANT, SILT LAGOON AND ACCESS / HAUL ROA D

REMPSTONE, EAST LEAKE QUARRY

August 2014

VOLUME 1 – PLANNING STATEMENT

Submitted to : Nottinghamshire County Council

Trent Bridge House

Fox Road

West Bridgford

Nottingham

NG2 6BJ

Prepared by: CEMEX UK Operations Ltd

CEMEX House

Evreux Way

Rugby

CV21 2DT

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND GRAVEL

EXTENSION – PLANNING STATEMENT 2014

2

Report Prepared by National Reserves Department Cemex House Evreux Way Rugby CV21 2DT Report Reference: 00_12_ELE_699_PS_KHH_250214_rempstone Report Status; Final Approval SIGNATURE DATE

QUARRY MANAGER

REGIONAL OPEPERATIONS MANAGER

ESTATES MANAGER

PLANNER

Revisions Record: Issue Report

status Comments Author Approved Date

2 Draft Amended MOW

Format History Policy Production rate

KHH 29/4/2015

3 Final Draft Amend ROW Amend Restoration – permissive path Amend – MOW permissive ROW routes Dust

KHH 23/5/2014

4 Final Draft Amend MOW KHH 16/06/2014 5 Final Draft Description KHH 23/06/2014 6 Final Draft Page 3 – updated page numbers, contents

/ appendix subdivided topographical plans and added Extraction Area plan Page 7 – Amended plan numbers (13_C007_ELEK/P5/689/8A & P2/968/9/6a) and added plan ref; P4/689/4C and Quarry Survey Amended Plan ref on application form Amended Appendix ref on pages; Page 14 (1.5.7), Page 15 (1.6.5), Page 19 (1.6.17), Page 26 (1.7.17 & 1.7.18), Page 28 (1.8.0), Page 35 (1.9.1) Page 37 (1.10.6)

KHH 2/7/2014

7 Final Draft Application date, Soil Handling Strategy New plan P5/689/12 (APPENDIX 25)

KHH 21/08/2014



3

The following plans have been UPDATED; P5/689/10 replaced by P5/689/10A, 13_C007_ELEK_007, 13_C007_ELEK_001, 13_C007_ELEK_004, 13_C007_ELEK_006_A, 13_C007_ELEK_012, 13_C007_ELEK_005_B, P5/689/8A, P5/689/9, Number of pages / Contents Landscape, restoration and aftercare (Appendix 16)



4

PLANNING STATEMENT – CONTENTS

PAGE

PART ONE (A) – DETAILS OF THE APPLICATION

1.1.0 INTRODUCTION 6

1.2.0 SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS / APPLICATION SUMMARY 8

1.3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS 10

1.4.0 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 11

1.5.0 PLANNING HISTORY 14

1.6.0 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 16

1.7.0 METHOD OF WORKING 24

1.8.0 RESTORATION 29

1.9.0 AFTERCARE 36

1.10.0 SUMMARY OF MAIN ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL EFFECTS 37

PART TWO (B) – PLANNING POLICY CONSIDERATIONS

2.1.0 INTRODUCTION 41

2.2.0 THE NEED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT 41

2.3.0 NATIONAL POLICY 45

2.4.0 LOCAL POLICY 53

PART THREE (C) – SUMMARY

3.1.0 BENEFITS OF THE DEVELOPMENT 73

3.2.0 STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 73

3.3.0 CONCLUSION 74

APPENDICES

1 APPLICATION FORMS, LANDOWNER AND AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS

CERTIFICATES

2 LOCATION PLAN (13_C007_ELEK_007)

3 SITE PLAN (13_C007_ELEK_001)

4 EXTENSION AREA (13_C007_ELEK_012)

5 METHOD OF WORKING (13_C007_ELEK/P5/689/8A)

6 RESTORATION PLAN – REMPSTONE (13_C007_ELEK/P5/689/9)

7 COMPOSITION RESTORATION OF WHOLE SITE (P5/689/10A)

8 LINGS FARM AND JENKS RESTORATION (P2/689/9/6A)

9 BURTONS RESTORATION (P4/689/4C)

10 ORIGINAL INTERMIN RESTORATION PLAN – EAST LEAKE QUARRY

(P2/689/13B)



5

11 TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY (OCT 2007) (REM_SUR_PW_1007.PDF)

12 QUARRY SURVEY (DEC 13) (EAL_MOD_PW_1213)

13 AREAS OF RESTORATION, BUNDING, SOIL STRIPPING

(EAL_BAP_PW_1213)

14 WATER LAGOON SYSTEM (ELEK_PLA_689_CAW_261112)

15 RIGHT OF WAY DIVERSION (13_C007_ELEK_005B)

16 LANDSCAPE, RESTORATION AND AFTERCARE SCHEME

17 GEOLOGY REPORT AND PLANS

18 SOIL HANDLING, MACHINERY AND PROCEDURES

19 EAST LEAKE PLANNING HISTORY (13_C007_ELEK_004)

20 LAND IN AFTERCARE – (13_C007_ELEK_003)

21 ANCILLARY OPERATIONS

22 BURTON METHOD OF WORKING P4/689/3E

23 106 HEADS OF TERMS

24 SURFACE WATER SCHEME

25 LANDSCAPING TO ALL SAINTS CHURCH – P5/689/12



6

1.0 PART ONE (A) – PLANNING STATEMENT

DETAILS OF THE APPLICATION

1.1 INTRODUCTION

1.1.2 The following planning statement has been prepared by CEMEX UK Operations Ltd (Cemex shall

be hereafter referred to as the ‘Applicant’) in support of this planning application for proposed

sand and gravel extraction on land known as Rempstone which shall form part of East Leake

Quarry as an extension to the existing quarry on adjacent land, with restoration to agriculture,

water features and woodland conservation.

1.1.3 The Applicant, is a leading global producer of cement, concrete and other building materials and

operates a number of quarries in the East Midlands and East Anglia Region. These operations

are focused on the extraction of sand and gravel reserves for the production of concrete and

mortar to local markets. The Applicant’s existing quarry at East Leake is a key strategic site

ideally situated to serve the south Nottinghamshire and north Leicestershire markets with

aggregates.

1.1.4 The proposed development is to form an extension to the applicant’s existing operations at East

Leake Quarry and consists of the extraction of approximately 1.78million tonnes of sand and

gravel over a period of approximately 10-12years from an area of agricultural land covering

approximately 27.5 hectares. The land would be restored to agriculture and water feature and

woodland conservation. This application would consolidate existing permission at East Leake

Quarry providing a single permission for the entire site.

1.1.5 The restoration concept for the site has been carefully designed to ensure that the final landform

compliments the existing restoration scheme for East Leake Quarry and takes into consideration

potential for bird strike and ecological enhancement. Cemex has developed experience over

many years in the restoration and management of land for a range of after-uses such as nature

conservation, recreation and woodland management. Notable examples of Cemex restoration

include Lackford Lakes in the County of Suffolk and Attenborough Nature Reserve in

Nottinghamshire. Restoration of these sites to a series of lakes have led to the creation of



7

regionally and nationally important nature reserves, now managed by Suffolk Wildlife Trust and

Nottinghamshire Wildlife Trust respectively.

1.1.6 The Company commissioned this application in 2012 taking into consideration baseline

information and operations at this time. Through the production of this application the Company

has amended the scheme taking into consideration operation, recent planning permissions,

technical data and consultee comments. The final scheme as presented within this application

provides a balance of operational efficiency and environmental and social protection and where

possible enhancement.



8

1.2 SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS

1.2.1. The following documents comprising the planning application have been submitted to

Nottinghamshire County Council, the determining planning authority:

• Planning Statement (Parts 1, 2 and 3)

• Application forms and landowner and agricultural certificates (Appendix 1)

• Plans, correspondence and supporting technical information (Appendix 2-24)

1.2.2 The application plans consist of the following:

• LOCATION PLAN - - 13_C007_ELEK_007

• SITE PLAN - 13_C007_ELEK_001

• EXTRACTION AREA -13_C007_ELEK_012

• METHOD OF WORKING - 13_C007_ELEK/P5/689/8A

• REMPSTONE RESTORATION PLAN - 13_C007_ELEK/P5/689/9

• OVERALL COMPLEX RESTORATION - P5/689/10A

• LINGS RESTORATION - P2/689/9/6A

• BURTONS RESTORATION PLAN - P4/689/4C

• LINGS INTERIM RESTORATON - P2/689/13B

• TOPOGRAPHICAL PLAN - REM_SUR_PW_1007.PDF

• QUARRY SURVEY PLAN - EAL_MOD_PW_1213

• AREAS OF RESTORATION, BUNDING, SOIL STRIPPING – EAL_BAP_PW_1213

• ANCILLARY OPERATIONS - 13_C007_ELEK_006_A

• WATER LAGOON SYSTEM - ELEK_PLA_689_CAW_261112

• RIGHT OF WAY DIVERSION - 13_C007_ELEK_005B

• PLANNING APPLICATION HISTORY - 13_C007_ELEK_004

• AFTERCARE PLAN - 13_C007_ELEK_003

• BURTONS METHOD OF WORKING - P4/689/3E

• LANDSCAPING TO ALL SAINTS CHURCH - P5/689/12



9

APPLICATION SUMMARY

1.2.3 Extraction area = 27.5ha

Sand and gravel extraction = 1.78million tonnes

Life of the site = 10-12 years

Production rate = 150,000- 180,000 tpa

Vehicle movements = 100 movements per day (50in/ 50out)



10

1.3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS

1.3.1 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is an important statutory procedure for ensuring that the

likely effects of a proposed development on the environment are fully understood and are taken

into account before the development is allowed to go ahead. The EIA process is designed to

identify any potential adverse environmental impacts and if appropriate, recommend the use of

mitigating measures or monitoring programmes that can be incorporated into the design of the

proposal to achieve an environmentally acceptable development. The EIA process enables the

Local Planning Authority, consultees and the general public to reach an informed opinion as to

the environmental consequences of the proposal. The findings of the EIA, together with any

mitigation measures, are a material consideration in determining whether or not planning

permission should be granted for the development.

1.3.2. The application site itself has been assessed internally to determine if an environmental

assessment is required. The proposed development is Scheduled 1 development under the

Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales)

Regulations 2011. The development is Schedule 1 as the proposed extraction area shall exceed

25hectares and shall be additional to the existing East Leake Quarry. It is therefore concluded

that an environmental statement is required under the Town and County Planning (Environmental

Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2011 and an Environmental Statement

has therefore been submitted with the planning application.

1.3.3 An Environmental Statement has been produced to accompany this planning application and can

be found in Volume 2 and Non Technical Summary within Volume 3.



11

1.4 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION

1.4.1 Cemex UK Materials Ltd operates the existing mineral extraction and processing plant at East

Leake Quarry. The quarry (including proposed extension) is located approximately 1km south

east of East Leake Village and 300m west of Rempstone Village. Nottingham City is located

approximately 15km to the north, Derby City is located 17km to the north west and Loughborough

Town 4km and Leicester City 14km to the south (see Appendix 2 – location plan reference

number 13_C007_ELEK_007). The Ordnance survey national grid reference is SK 564 247. The

site is located within the County of Nottinghamshire and District of Rushcliffe. The site is located

in close proximity to the M1, M42, A46 and A6 all leading off the A6006.

1.4.2 The application site, outlined in red, covers a total of approximately 93ha although the proposed

extraction area would cover approximately 27.5ha. The proposed extraction area consists of one

relatively flat, rectangle shaped agricultural parcel separated from the existing site by a mature

hedgerow which runs north to south.

1.4.3 The field is bound to the south by the A6006 (Melton/ Ashby Road), to the west by Jenks sand

and gravel extraction (8/12/01488/CMA). Rempstone Church, Clifton Lodge, Beech Tree Lodge

and Loughborough Road bound the site to the east. Sheepwash Brook bounds the site to the

north in addition to pockets of woodland planting. The southern bound includes mature hedgerow

and trees. There are two existing agricultural accesses to the south on to the A6006.

1.4.4 The proposed extraction area is located 200m to the north of Lings Farm and 150m from

Rempstone Hall (both separated by the A6006). Rempstone Church and Clifton Lodge bound the

site to the south east. Beech Tree Lodge bounds the site to east. There are various properties

located to the south on the opposite side of the A6006 including Farm Cottage, Rempstone Hall

Farm and East Lodge. Oaklands Farm and 4 Loughborough Road look down upon the site from

the top of the wolds approximately 130m to the north of the extraction area.

1.4.5 As stated above the application site is currently in agricultural arable use. The extraction areas

agricultural land classification can generally be classified as Grade 2-3b agricultural land with the

majority of the site subgrade 2 and 3a and with small patches of subgrade 3b which complements

the surrounding agricultural classification.



12

1.4.6 The topography of the application area and surrounding landscape is generally flat with a small

undulation to the north east typical of the Leicestershire and Nottinghamshire Wolds. Due to the

topography and existing hedgerow screening along the A6006 reduces views into the proposed

extension area although Oaklands Farm, The Oaklands and Beech Tree Farm have more

prominent views into the site. The main vantage point is the Public right of way which runs

across the site, Oaklands Farm and The Oaklands due to the topography and also Beech Tree

Lodge to the east.

1.4.7 There is one right of way crossing the proposed extraction area which runs north west to south

east existing near Rempstone Church on the A6006. There is a bridleway crossing the previous

extraction area known as Jenks.

1.4.8 The main East Leake Quarry aggregate processing plant, reception offices, silt lagoons and

stocking area lies towards the northern boundary within the centre of the application boundary.

The internal access road between the extraction area and plant site shall run through previous

extraction area known as Jenk’s. A small gap would be made in the mature hedgerow into

Rempstone (and shall be gated) providing access from the existing plant site through into the

proposed extraction area.

1.4.9 Access to East Leake Quarry from the public highway is via an existing haul road leading onto

Rempstone Road. The site has a designated traffic route along the Rempstone Road leading

onto the A6006. All traffic is strictly controlled and restricted to this route in order to avoid passing

through the village of East Leake.

1.4.10 The quarry is well placed to serve local building suppliers and concrete plants in Nottinghamshire,

Leicestershire and East Midlands.

1.4.11 The site is located within East Midlands Aerodrome consultation area (arrival path and holding

area). The site is not located within a National Park or Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The

site is not located within 2km of a Special Area of Protection, Site of Special Scientific Interest,

Ramsar or Ancient Scheduled Monument. The site is located within 1km of a registered national

Park and Gardens – Stanford Hall. Stanford Hall is a grade II listed building and set within 113ha



13

of registered park and gardens. The landscape park dates back to the 18 Centuries with

additional features added in the 19 and 20 Centuries.



14

1.5 PLANNING HISTORY

1.5.1 Mineral extraction has been sought in the East Leake area since the mid eighties with the Local

Minerals Planning Authority refusing two applications mainly due to the lack of need and being

contrary to planning policy. Planning permission was first granted in 1991 after the company

appealed the last planning refusal (application reference number 8/J1/85/1141/P). The planning

approval was subject to 37 planning condition and low level restoration to agriculture and a lake.

The original planning permission included the construction of the existing aggregate processing

plant. This permission area is known as Lings.

1.5.2 In 2009 planning permission was issued (reference 8/07/02187/CMA) for an additional three

phased extension to the east of the main quarry. The 2009 planning permission was granted

contrary to being an un-allocated site due to its small scale, duration and location to the local

markets. Planning permission 8/07/02187/CMA has been amend to extend the period of

extraction for a further 12months to accommodate increased reserves and slight economic down

turn (8/12/01488/CMA). This permission area is known as Jenks

1.5.3 In 2013 planning permission was issued (reference 8/11/00157/CMA) for an additional 4 phased

extension to the south west of the existing plant site. Extraction commenced September 2013

and shall be completed within 3 years (September 2016). This permission is known as Burtons

1.5.4 The existing processing plant, silt lagoons and haul road has the benefit of planning permission

until 30 September 2017 (PP8/14/00341.CMA) (Lings).

1.5.5 This planning application to extract material from land known as Rempstone shall seek to

continue to utilise the existing plant site and proposes to retain the void within Jenks as a means

of silt disposal. The use of the existing plant is considered the most sustainable and

environmentally acceptable option as the plant is established and screened. It is proposed that

Rempstone would commence during final phase of Burton’s permission to ensure there is a

continuation of mineral extraction at East Leake Quarry.

1.5.6 The proposed extension area is not allocated within the Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan as a

future mineral site. The proposed extension area has been put forward as part of the emerging



15

Local Development Framework. No formal conclusion has been undertaken determining if the

proposed extension area is a suitable allocated site for future mineral working. It is considered

that the proposed extension provides a strategic release of sand and gravel to the south of the

County and provides opportunity of conservation restoration. The Rempstone extraction area is

considered a logical progression of mineral working within the East Leake area ensuring the

release of quality reserves prior to quarrying operations ceasing in this area.

1.5.7 The Company, in seeking to continue extraction of sand and gravel and utilise existing

infrastructure on site. Plan ref:13_C007_ELEK_004 with the proposed extraction area illustrated

on plan 13_C007_ELEK_012 Appendix to this application illustrates the permission boundaries

related to East Leake Quarry.



16

1.6 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

1.6.1 This proposal is for the extraction of approximately 1.78 million tonnes of sand and gravel from an

area of approximately 27.5 hectares split into 6 phases. Following extraction the site will be

restored at a lower level incorporating agriculture, lakes and woodland conservation which shall

integrate and complement permitted restoration schemes at East Leake Quarry and established

wildlife habitats.

1.6.2 The proposal involves the continued use of the existing access to the public highway onto

Rempstone Road, reception facilities, aggregate processing plant, and the silt and freshwater

lagoons.

Geology

1.6.3 Geological investigations have indicated that the proposed extraction area contains

approximately 1.78 million tonnes of sand and gravel at an average thickness of 4.96 metres

although maximum depth could be over 9m. The Geological Report is located in Appendix 17

within the Planning Statement.

1.6.4 The original geological investigation looked at the whole agricultural field and estimated 2.20

million tonnes over an area of approximately 30ha. The Company has used this geological data

as the foundations and starting point of this application. The extraction area has been influenced

by the geological data, high clay spots and possible interburden layers, hydrology, noise, dust

and ecological data. The final extraction boundary takes into consideration necessary standoff,

for example highways 30m from the A6006, electricity line, Sheepwash brook (15m), Planting

(root protection areas of 3-10m). The final extraction boundary for Rempstone is identified within

the Method of working plan (13_C007_ELEK/P5/689/8A).

1.6.5 The final extraction boundary and reserve of 1.78mt would enable extraction to continue at the

quarry for an additional 10-12 years. The proposal would be worked in 6 principle phases, as an

extension of the existing quarry, at a rate of approximately 150,000 to180,000 tonnes per annum:

ultimately the extraction rate would depend on the strength of the demand from the local market.



17

1.6.6 East Leake sand and gravel reserve is of a glacial origin and has bedrock of mercia mudstone

group of Triassic age which consists of predominantly of mudstone with siltstones and thin

limestones. The Geological report summaries two investigations in 1992 and 2007 and takes into

consideration workings undertaken on site and it is concluded that the reserve will continue to

have a high level of fines of 20% although this could drop to 7% or increase to 30% this is due to

a high level of clay and silt within the deposit. The anticipated soil and overburden levels vary

over the geological search area from 0.2m to 13m with an average of 3.07m providing an overall

figure of approximately 1mt to be removed and used as restoration material. The geological

report identified a significantly deep overburden section along the northern boundary towards

Sheepwash Brook which also holds high level of silty fines. It has been concluded that the

northern area and south east corner be excluded as they are economically unviable to work due

to high levels of overburden/ clay and silty fines. The overall mineral thickness ranges from 0-

9.95m with an average of 4.96m, although reserves in Jenks adjacent did appear to reach nearly

12m in depth. The mineral quality should produce an average of 37.8% gravel, 49.1% sand and

13.1% fines. The deposit has varied in quality which has led to the larger phases that can be

worked in two benches. Due to the varied quality the Company proposed to commence extraction

in Rempstone whilst completing the final phase of Burton’s.

Sequence of extraction

1.6.7 The proposed extension would commence during the final phase of extraction within the

permitted area known as ‘Burtons Land’. Access to the proposed extension area would be

gained by the internal haul road through a small section of hedgerow along the western boundary

with Jenks Land. Internal traffic signs and routing would be introduced ensuring right of way to

external HGV vehicle movements and rights of way users. The proposed extension would not

increase annual output from the site only increase the duration of mineral extraction at the site by

a maximum of 12 years.

Method of Extraction

1.6.8 It is proposed for the site to be dewater via a pump, then excavate the mineral using a 360

degree hydraulic excavator and transporting the mineral to the existing processing plant at the

quarry via dumper truck. It is proposed that mineral extraction would be worked in regular

campaigns throughout the year to meet demand. Raw material would be stockpiled within the

existing plant site stocking area, for processing and sale. The pump for dewatering will be

located along the western boundary and kept to the north were possible to reduce noise impact to

sensitive receptors located on A6006 and A60, the pipe would travel through the internal access



18

point and buried under the bridleway linking into the existing surface water management system

of Jenks and Lings which would be utilised and retained for the life of the processing plant as

shown on plan ELEK_PLA_689_CAW_261112.

1.6.9 The general approach to the extraction of sand and gravel within Rempstone would be to peg out

the extraction area, fence any hedgerow and Rights of Way as necessary. Clear any vegetation,

strip soils and overburden which would be principally stored in bunds along the southern and

eastern boundary or direct placement to assist restoration. The mounds would provide acoustic

and visual screening. Archaeological investigation would be implemented in accordance with an

approved WSI during soil stripping. It is proposed each face will be worked to an angle of 1 in 2.

A surface water trench shall be created along the southern boundary as necessary to catch water

from the soil bunds to prevent water travelling on the A6006.

1.6.10 Overall approximately 1mt of overburden / clay including topsoil’s would be removed as part of the

extraction process which would be used as part of the sites reclamation.

Production Rate

1.6.11 Extraction and processing is dictated by market demand and taking into consideration the last 5

years sales the Company anticipate a production rate of between 150,000 – 180,000tpa.

Equipment Required

Processing Plant

1.6.12 The static aggregate processing plant would be retained within the existing quarry plant site

complex for the crushing, washing and grading of the excavated sand and gravel.

1.6.13 The existing fresh and small silt water lagoons would similarly be retained in order to allow for

settlement of the silt fraction washed from the sand and gravel, and also to supply fresh re-

circulated water to the plant.

1.6.14 The existing finished product stockpile area would also be retained, as will the workshop building,

weighbridge, site office/messroom and car park area.



19

Mobile Plant

1.6.15 A number of elements of mobile plant are required, namely:

i) Soil Stripping and Handling – soil and overburden would be removed using a hydraulic

excavator with dump trucks being used to take the material to either create a temporary

storage/screen bund to place the soil directly on to a previously worked area for final

restoration.

ii) Mineral Extraction / Restoration – this would entail the use of a 360o excavator and

wheeled loading shovel working on benches set below ground level. The shovel would

also be used to load the dumper. A dozer and shovel will place restoration material to

achieve permitted contours.

iii)Lorry Loading – a second wheeled shovel would be employed within the plant area to feed the

plant with raw material for processing, load lorries with the finished products and general

stockpile handling.

All of this plant currently operates in this manner within the existing extraction area.

Soil Handling

1.6.16 A 360 degree back actor excavator and a dumper truck will be used in the soil stripping

operations. The storage bund will be formed by the loose placement of stripped soils by the

dumper and shaped using a bulldozer with low pressure tracks. Topsoil /overburden/ clay will be

stored separately with the bunds being a maximum of 3 and 5m high and seeded and maintained

until replacement.

1.6.17 All personnel involved with the soil stripping and restoration of the extraction area will be given

specific instructions from the Quarry Manager with regard to the importance of conserving the soil

resource and not causing inadvertent loss or damage. No soils will be moved in wet weather or

when ground conditions are not suitable. Details of soil handling, machinery and procedures is

set out in Appendix 18.



20

Hours of Operations

1.6.18 It is proposed to continue to operate the quarry on the same hours and days as currently

permitted which are:

07.00 – 19.00 Monday to Friday

07.00 – 13.00 Saturdays

And no such operations shall be carried out on Sundays or Public (bank) Holidays.

Access / Vehicle Movements

1.6.19 As stated above the proposal will continue to use the main site access onto Rempstone Road /

A6006. The traffic movements associated with the proposal would continue at approximately 72

movements per day with a maximum of a 100 vehicle movements as previously conditioned. The

proposed extension will only result in the continuation of historic production levels. As a result

traffic movements associated with these operations will remain the same as currently experienced

at the permitted quarry site. The access route to the quarry was designed with this level of traffic

in mind and the Company strictly adheres to the designated access route and agreed practices.

The type of vehicles which enters the site varies greatly depending on the requirement of each

customer. Typically the average vehicle is a two tonne truck with the largest vehicles to visit the

site having a twenty tonne capacity. Additional vehicles will be small private vehicles of quarry

and company staff.

1.6.20 Existing signs at the quarry entrance instructs all HGV drivers to turn left only out of the site this

shall be maintained throughout the life of the development and all drivers of HGVs shall exit the

site turning left only. The existing wheelwash facility would be utilised as and when necessary to

ensure no mud debris is deposited on the public highway. The wheelwash shall be maintained at

all times.

Rights of Way

1.6.21 The proposed development shall affect one right of way and one bridleway. Bridleway

Rempstone BW11 and Right of Way Rempstone FP1 which leads into East Leake FP1 to the

north.



21

1.6.22 Bridleway Rempstone BW11 has been temporarily diverted round the perimeter of Jenks

permission area to enable mineral extraction to be undertaken in this area and shall be restored

along the definitive route once restoration has been completed.



22

1.6.23 The diversion order of Rempstone BW11 was issued on the 18th March 2011 and is in place until

completion of development and restoration of the site. The use of Jenks field for silt disposal

related to mineral extraction on adjacent land shall delay reinstatement of the bridleway but shall

also ensure the definitive route is reinstated to a suitable condition for its lawful use as a public

bridleway. Until this time it is proposed that the Bridleway diversion route continue until

restoration works have been completed.



23

1.6.24 To assist mineral extraction within the proposed extension the Company seek to temporarily

divert Rempstone FP1 to follow a southerly then westerly route following the internal field

boundary as illustrated on plan ref: 13_COO7_ELEK_005B. The Company seek to link the

existing bridleway diversion with the proposed Rempstone FP1 diversion with a small gate

created within the hedgerow between Jenks and Rempstone extraction area, this gate would be

removed once restoration has been completed and replanted with species rich hedgerow. The

proposed diversion shall be a grassed surface covering a width of 2m and shall be in place until

final restoration at which point the original definitive route shall be reinstated.

1.6.25 The Company is committed to maintain the current definitive rights of way Rempstone FP1 as

long as possible. In addition to the formal diversion route the Company also propose to provide a

route following the eastern and northern permission boundary which is considered to be more

interested. During phase 1 and 2 a small diversion would be identified around the proposed

extraction area as shown illustrated on plan 13_COO7_ELEK_005B this route would be fenced to

protect public users.

1.6.26 The proposed routes should provide continued access of Rempstone FP1 during extraction and

once restoration has been completed the original definitive route shall be reinstated. As the land

is privately owned and shall be restored and handed back to the landowner as agriculture and

conservation it is not possible to introduce additional access routes.

1.6.27 The Company shall continue to provide a new link from bridleway to the Rempstone FP1 as

approved through previous planning permissions.



24

1.7 METHOD OF WORKING

(Details of the method of working can be seen on plan 13_C007_ELEK/P5/689/8A)

1.7.1 Prior to the commencement of development the following works shall be undertaken within the

initial phase

• Vegetation clearance

• Archaeological investigation

• Fencing of any root protection area

• Creation of initial soil bunds

• Creation of internal haul road

• Laying any water / silt pipe work

1.7.2 It is proposed for works to commence within Rempstone during the final phase of Burton’s. This

approach has been identified due to the geological variation within the deposit at East Leake

Quarry. The Company seeks to maintain a full product range which may require blending of the

upper deposit of Rempstone and lower deposit of Burton’s phase 4 (Plan ref; P4/689/3e).

Burton’s operation is undertaken on a campaign basis and this approach would be continued for

the initial working of phase 1 within Rempstone. The Company does not propose to extract

mineral simultaneously from the Burton’s phase 4 and Rempstone phase 1 so as to reduce any

environmental effects of extraction upon local residents.

1.7.3 Works shall commence in the south west corner of Rempstone in phase 1, extraction would then

progress in a general anticlockwise direction back to the plant site. The Company seek to extract

phase 1 as silt lagoon to ensure sufficient capacity is provided and water recharge can be

achieved. The internal haul road shall be located along the northern extraction boundary

spearing south into the individual phases as and when necessary. All haul roads created on site

shall ensure that one way systems are introduced to prevent the need for vehicles to reverse

reducing noise impact upon surrounding residents. Stand offs include 3m from existing

hedgerow, minimum of 35m from the A6006 (which shall include soil bunds, surface water trench

if necessary and ROW diversion), 100 metres from Beech Tree Lodge and 15m from Sheepwash

Brook.



25

1.7.4 Phase 1 covers an area of approximately 4.93ha and shall extract approximately 298,000 tonnes

split between several campaigns over a period of up to 1.6-1.9years. Soils would be stripped

starting from the south western corner of the extension area moving in a northerly direction.

Topsoil stripped would be deposited in storage mounds along the southern boundary of the

A6006 providing additional screening to properties along Ashby Road (Melton Road). Clay

removed shall be located in a bund to the north, east and south east which shall be a height of

4m.

1.7.5 The soil mound along the A6006 shall be to a maximum height of 3 metres and seeded and

maintained for the duration of extraction. The remaining soils and overburden shall be stored

along the northern and eastern boundary for the duration of the operations creating the acoustic

mound surrounding Beech Tree Lodge. All soils shall remain on site and used in the restoration.

Phase 1 would be used to create two silt lagoons to assist the processing of the material and

recycling of water on site.

1.7.6 Phase 2 has been split into 3 areas to assist progressive extraction, restoration and silt disposal.

Phase 2a covers an area of 2.31ha, phase 2b covers 1.54ha and phase 2c covers 2.19 ha and in

total shall release 306,000t of sand and gravel. Working within all areas of phase 2 should take

approximately 1.7-2.04 years.

1.7.7 Phase 2a topsoil is placed within phase1 to assist the silt lagoon bank profiling. Interburden and

clay shall be used to assist the formation of phase 1 silt lagoons and final restoration contours

within phase 2a. Remaining clays shall be stored to the east ready for final placement.

1.7.8 Phase 2b topsoil shall be placed along the southern boundary of the A6006. Interburden

released shall be used within phase 2b remaining interburden and clay shall be placed within

phase 2a.

1.7.9 Phase 2c topsoil and interburden shall be directly placed into phases 2b and 2c. Working within

phase 2c shall be in a northerly direction



26

1.7.10 The third phase covers an area of approximately 4.08 ha split into two equal areas removing a

total of approximately 272,000 tonnes of sand and gravel over a period 1.5 – 1.8y. Phase 3a,

topsoil and interburden would be stripped with topsoil being placed within phase 2b and 2c,

interburden shall be placed within phase 3a and clay would be placed within phase 2c and

northern storage bund. Phase 3b would continue to be worked in an easterly to northerly

direction, interburden would be directly placed within phase 3a and 3b, topsoil would be placed to

the east and stored ready for restoration and clay material would be placed within phase 3a.

1.7.11 The fourth phase covers an area of 2.87ha removing approximately 210,000tonnes of sand and

gravel over 1.1 -1.4years. Phase 4, topsoil would be stripped shall be directly placed within

phase 3a to assist restoration. Clay shall be placed within phase 3b with interburden placed

within phase 3b and 4 ready for topsoil. Clays stored in the northern bund shall be moved and

placed within phase 3b.

1.7.12 The fifth phase covers an area of 5.1ha removing 397,000tonnes of sand and gravel over 2-2.6

years. Topsoil would be directly placed into phase 3b to assist restoration and stored to the east.

Clay and interburden shall be placed within phase 4 with a significant proportion placed within

phases 4 and 5.

1.7.13 The sixth phase covers an area of 4.62ha removing 298,000tonnes of sand and gravel over 1.6-

1.9years. Topsoil would be and directly placed into phase 5 to assist restoration. Clay from

phase 6 shall be placed within phase 5 in addition to the clay bunds to the east and north. As

phase 6 is worked soil shall be taken from the eastern bunds and used to restore phase 5.

1.7.14 Topsoil from the southern boundary shall be used to restore the remainder of phase 5 and phase

6. Virgin material between phase 1 and 2 shall be cut and used to re-profile the silt lagoons in

phase1. On site clay, silt, interburden and topsoil shall be used to achieve the restoration

contours. Material is progressively used to restore phase 1 and 6 in accordance with restoration

plan ref P5/689/9. It is anticipated that the restoration of the site would be completed within 24

months from the cessation of mineral extraction.

1.7.15 The silt produced from the proposed extraction and processing of phase 1- 3 would be placed

into silt lagoons within Jenks. The remaining silt created from the processing of phases 3-6 shall



27

be disposed within the newly created silt lagoons created within Rempstone phase 1. The newly

created silt lagoons shall be linked to the existing fresh water lagoon and existing processing

plant as shown on plan ELEK_PLA_689_CAW_261112.

1.7.16 The extraction area shall be linked to the existing processing plant via an internal haul road for

quarry vehicles and plant through a gap to be created through the existing hedgerow between 1c

Jenks and Phase 1 Rempstone. The haul road shall continue through Jenks into the existing

processing plant.

1.7.17 Soils would continue to be handled in accordance with DEFRA (MAFF’s) good practice guide for

soil handling as demonstrated in Appendix 18. Soils would be stripped and stored for restoration

within the proposed extension area.

1.7.18 Restoration should be completed within two years of cessation of mineral extraction. Once the

restoration profile contours have been achieved soils shall be placed in anticipation of planting in

accordance with Appendix 16. Planting shall be undertaken within the first available planting

season.



28

1.8 RESTORATION

(Plans of the restoration scheme are contained in Appendix 6, within Plan No P5/689/9.)

Rempstone

1.8.1 The proposed restoration seeks to complement adjacent restoration details and provide a

balance of agriculture and conservation helping to assist the Counties bio-diversity targets.

Approved restoration schemes at East Leake Quarry consist of low level agriculture, silt lagoons

naturally regeneration to conservation, wetland and landscaped planting. The proposed

restoration scheme for Rempstone has been designed to complement the restoration schemes

already approved, taking into consideration geological constraints, maintaining the landscape

character of the Nottinghamshire Wolds whilst protecting best and most versatile agricultural land

and further enhancing conservation and biodiversity. The proposal offers a mix of woodland,

agriculture and water conservation.

1.8.2 The current landform at Rempstone is an undulating arable field with no internal drainage ditches,

hedgerow or mature trees. The site is bound by mature hedgerow and planting which shall be

retained as part of the proposed sand and gravel operation.

1.8.3 The restoration scheme for Rempstone scheme involves the creation of 7 lakes along the

northern extraction boundary with the remaining land being restored to similar grade agricultural

land and woodland. The lakes will be created from the silt lagoons and extraction void and shall

be restored in a manner as to protect aerodrome safety whilst promoting bio-diversity.

1.8.4 The existing hedgerow has small gaps which would be planted to improve screening within the

first available planting season. The hedgerow would be maintained along the site and allowed to

grow up to improve screening throughout the duration of the operations. Additional trees shall be

planted within the hedgerow to improve the ecological value of the hedgerow and landscape

character. New hedgerow is proposed within the agricultural fields providing additional

biodiversity, these hedgerows shall also benefit from field ditches that will flow into the water

features.

1.8.5 Around the lake margins natural regeneration and planting of reedbed would be promoted and

conservation grassland which would be managed at a height of 200mm. Planting would

predominantly consisting of tree species such as Field Maple, Alder, Wild Cherry, Oak and Crack



29

Willow with additional shrub planting of Dogwood, Hazel, Hawthorn, Holly, Blackthorn, Goat

Willow, Grey Willow, Wych Elm and Osier.

1.8.6 To create this restored landform clay, interburden and soils would be stored or directly placed.

Interburden soils would be laid at a depth of approximately 20cm. Top soil will be progressively

spread out from storage mounds to a depth of 40cm.

1.8.7 It is considered that this area of the restoration should have a soil equivalent to the existing grade

2-3b classification. Upon restoration this area will provide a valuable agricultural resource for the

farmer restoring traditional farming activities to continue alongside water nature conservation.

Lings (Plan Ref:P2/689/9/6A)

1.8.8 The permitted restoration of Lings Farm shall be amended as part of this application to take into

consideration the current situation. One constraint of the site is that it has evolved through the

placement of silt material therefore It has become necessary to revise the permitted restoration

scheme.

1.8.9 The principle reasons for the proposed amendments have arisen due to additional silt being

disposed within the Lings water management system. As part of the 2007 planning permission to

extract sand and gravel from land known as Jenks it was intended that silt created through the

processing of material extracted from Jenks be placed within the void at Jenks through a series of

silt lagoons. The increased depth of the working within Jenks and time necessary to create a

sealed silt lagoon rendered the void unsuitable for silt disposal within the given time frame.

Therefore it was necessary to continue to use the existing silt lagoons system within Lings

permission area for the processing of material extracted from Jenks altering the final water levels

and lake formations. The additional silt has amended the final landform.

1.8.10 Since the restoration plan for Lings Farm was approved 22/2/1991 amendments to the site

contours and developing habitats has led to this revised restoration scheme. None of the

variations are adverse or contrary to the ethos of the restoration to wetland, conservation and

agriculture previously approved. The variations proposed reflect the current situation

experienced on site and the constraints these impose on the final land form.

1.8.11 In summary the revised Lings restoration scheme illustrates the provision for a mixed use

restoration scheme which would incorporate the following proposed landscape elements:



30

• Agricultural land

• Lake

• Seasonal wetland

• Conservation grassland

• Sand face

• Hedgerows

Lings Current Position

1.8.12 Over a third of the site has been restored through the process of silt disposal and replacement of

soils in accordance with the approved restoration scheme P2/689/9/6A. The agricultural field

along the southern boundary have been restored and H8, H7, H6 and P1hedgerows and

woodland were planted in 2011/ 12. The rough grassland to the north west has been created and

northern lake formed which has seen the establishment of wetland margins and aquatic habitat.

The wet grassland over silt disposal adjacent to P1 planting and H4 has naturally regenerated

with reeds and willow developing. A soil mound located around Home Farm Cottage remains and

has been historically planted. It is not proposed for this mound to be removed until final

restoration.

1.8.13 The larger open water features to the south of The Lings Farm properties has been extracted and

the final contours have been created through silt disposal. The silt lagoon barriers between the

water features have been located in a more easterly position as necessary to assist deposition of

silt particles and to ensure water quality remains clear within the large open water feature to the

east of The Lings Farm. Final bank profiles are yet to be completed around the lake perimeter.

The temporary soil mound around The Lings Farm still remains and H9 hedgerow is still to be

completed. The original silt pipe work is still located along the southern lake margin separating

the water features and wet grassland which shall be removed in 2014 allowing restoration of this

area. The water feature to the north of The Lings Farm has been created but the three small

ponds along the northern boundary have not been established, they have been replaced by the

final lake bank profile. The historic silt lagoons which run along site Sheepwash Brook have

naturally regenerated into wet woodland of willow.

1.8.14 The water feature located under the plant site has not been created due to ongoing use of

existing infrastructure. The approved interim restoration scheme has been implemented whilst

existing infrastructure remains on site illustrated on plan ref:P2/689/13b. Soil mounds are located

along the internal haul road and to the east of the site to assist final restoration.



31

Lings Proposed Landform

1.8.15 A review of the site survey and existing landform when compared to the permitted restoration

scheme identified a need to update the approved contours as part of the overall restoration plan

for East Leake Quarry.

1.8.16 Alterations of the landform have become necessary to take account of the differing on site levels,

increased silt deposit and lake levels, amendment to the large lake profile and location of

hedgerows. As such the variations represent minor alterations to the approved plan recognising

that there are always minor variations that need to be accounted for when restoring a sand and

gravel quarry.

Lings Proposed Amendments

1.8.17 It is propose that the hedgerows H8, H6 and H4 follow the final contours around the wet

grassland instead of straight lines providing a more natural line with the land. It is proposed for H2

to be removed due the retention of the soil bund around Home Farm Cottage and future use as

an agricultural field. H8 hedgerow has been extended in a more northerly direction to replicate an

historic hedgerow line. The agreed hedgerow mix shall remain as approved and implemented

accordingly.

1.8.18 The middle lake depth has been reduced to less that 0.5m and shall develop into a seasonal

wetland / silt conservation area instead of being open water. The sand martin face shall be

retained. The northern and western wetland margins shall be re-profiled with soils currently stored



32

in temporary bunds along the boundary with The Lings Farm. Once the silt pipe has been

removed 2014 the southern lake margins shall be graded providing a gentle slope (excluding

sand face) between the established wet grassland and the new seasonal wetland. Once the soil

bund along The Lings Farm has been removed once mineral extraction has ceased hedgerow H9

shall be planted within the next available planting season.

1.8.19 The small water feature to the north of The Lings Farm shall be retained in its current form and

part of hedgerow H9 shall be planted 2014/15. The small water feature shall be maintained as

temporary light grazing until mineral extraction ceases and final restoration is completed through

the removal of the soil mounds, the land shall then be reseeded as conservation grassland. The

northern lake formation shall alter from the previously approved plan taking into consideration silt

disposal and final extraction face. The three ponds proposed to the north of along site

Sheepwash Brook shall now be incorporated into the lake although it is proposed for the margins

to be stepped to provide seasonal variation linking to the small pond to the north of The Lings

Farm. To compensate the loss of the three small water features it is proposed to retain the water

feature to the east near the offices and provide a link to the main lake feature through the existing

stocking area. The final water levels shall also reduce due to silt disposal providing a more

diverse wetland feature. The Company do not proposed to extract sand and gravel from beneath

the plant site and therefore the dog leg part of the lake shall not be created. It is proposed for this

area to be reinstated to a conservation grassland area with pockets of bare sand floor and

various small scrapes being created to enhance the biodiversity of the area. The historic silt

lagoons located to the north of the site following Sheepwash Brook shall be retained with

additional woodland / shrub planting being created enhancing the existing hedgerow around the

silt lagoons linking the different landforms and contours. The soil bund along Sheepwash Brook

shall be maintained until mineral extraction has ceased at which point it shall be partially removed

reducing the height by a 1m or remain in situ as to necessary to retain surrounding habitats

naturally regenerating, the Company seek to monitor the evolving landscape and seek

confirmation from the County Ecologist and Landscape officer prior to final restoration of this

area, any soils removed would assist final restoration of Lings Farm permission area.

1.8.20 It is considered that the proposed amendments shall not negatively impact the overall aims of the

original restoration scheme. The proposed landform provides a rich seasonal wetland habitat

with reduced large water features which will benefit bird strike management on site.

1.8.21 Jenks and Burton Restoration



33

1.8.22 Jenks and Burtons permitted restoration scheme shall remain as permitted and have been

transposed upon the overall restoration plan to show full context of the final restoration of East

Leake Quarry. The proposed extraction at Rempstone should not delay restoration of Burton’s

and shall ensure Jenks restoration can be implemented in accordance with approved details.



34

1.9 AFTERCARE

1.9.1. The Applicant recognises it’s social, legal and environmental responsibility in ensuring successful

integration of the restored landform into its surroundings. This will only be achieved by the

implementation of an aftercare programme. A restoration and aftercare assessment and

management have been included as part of this planning application, please see Appendix 16. It

is proposed that should planning permission be granted the aftercare scheme would be

implemented progressively on completion of restoration. Essentially the scheme covers the

management of the woodland, grassland and reinstated agricultural areas and the new habitats

created in accordance with good practice.

1.9.2 The main objective of aftercare is to restore land covered by the proposed development to a

condition similar to that of undisturbed land and to enhance and develop the biodiversity and

nature conservation.

1.9.3 Detail of the proposed aftercare management is detailed in Appendix 16 of the Planning

Statement.

1.9.4 Agricultural aftercare shall be undertaken for a period of 5y and woodland and conservation areas

shall be managed for an aftercare period of 10y.



35

1.10 SUMMARY OF MAIN ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS

1.10.1 It has been concluded that the development is EIA development and therefore requires an

Environmental Statement. This section provides a brief overview of the possible environmental

effects assessed in the Environmental Statement attached to this planning application.

1.10.2 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL AMENITY: The proposed development is not likely to lead to any

adverse landscape, significant magnitude of change or long term visual impacts. The proposed

development shall have a moderate impact during the operation period but this should be limited

upon ROW users and sensitive receptors and mitigated by careful placement of screening bunds

and progressive restoration. The proposed development is not within a designated landscape

area and the proposed restoration will not appear out of keeping with the surrounding landscape.

It is recognised that the proposed extraction is encroaching Rempstone Village and properties

along the A6006, it is considered with proposed screening mounds along the southern and

eastern boundary that views into the site shall be reduced to limited first floor views.

1.10.3 RESTORATION AND AGRICULTURE: Following the careful stripping, storage and replacement

of soils it will be possible to reinstate part of the land for agricultural use which can then be

returned to the Landowner for farming. The remaining land would be used to create a

conservation feature including planting. A benefit of restoring part of the site to nature

conservation is assisting bio-diversity targets through the creation of broadleaved woodland, field

margins, conservation grassland and water margins.

1.10.4 ECOLOGY: In respect of ecology, the site is of low ecological value and therefore no adverse

impact has been identified. The conservation habitat being offered as part of the proposed

restoration will enhance local biodiversity and will contribute towards the targets of the

‘Nottingham Biodiversity Action Plan’. The principle biodiversity action plan targets include;

Arable field margins, reedbeds, hedgerows, oak- birch woodland and unimproved neutral

grassland.

1.10.5 ARCHAEOLOGY: This site was subject to an archaeological survey as part of the planning

application for the current extraction site. The proposed extraction area has potential for anglo

saxon remains related to St Peter’s Church and Rempstone Estate, but no national significant

remains have been discovered to date that has required preservation in situ. Therefore it is

unlikely that adverse impacts will arise from the proposed development and in fact the proposals



36

will contribute towards the knowledge and understanding of local archaeology and its wider

setting. It is proposed that the existing archaeological scheme be developed to include the

proposed extension area, this could be controlled by a planning condition.

1.10.6 HYDRO-GEOLOGY: Groundwater levels would be reduced for the duration of the development. It

is not envisaged that this will have a significant effect on nearby properties or agricultural land.

As part of assessing the material considerations and impacts of the proposed extension a Flood

Risk Assessment has been undertaken. It is concluded there should be no adverse impact on

flooding within the area, mitigation measures are recommended with regard to surface water

collection in a trench from soil mounds as necessary (scheme attached in Appendix 24 provides

details of trench as necessary) and seasonal wetland around the restored lake margins to

accommodate any significant flood flows.

1.10.7 TRAFFIC: The proposal represents a continuation of existing activities with no increase in vehicle

movements. So as not to compromise the use, safety or amenity of other road users the site

already possesses the entire necessary site access arrangements and infrastructure. East Leake

Village would continue to be protected from HGV site traffic which enters or leaves the site.

1.10.8 NUISANCE: It is not envisaged that dust or noise would be a problem during the development.

The following dust suppression methods would continue to be implemented for the duration of

operations.

• Water bowser

• Dampening of haul roads

• Spraying of stockpiles

• Seeding of soil mounds

• Wheelwash

Even though the site will be dewatered the mineral would still be moist when excavated.

1.10.9 Construction noise levels are of a short duration while the operational noise levels would remain

within acknowledged levels as indicated in a revised noise report commissioned as part of this

proposal (see Environmental Statement Volume 2 - Noise). It is not proposed that noise levels

shall increase through the proposed extension. The Company proposes to operate in

accordance with the following noise limits

Noise Limits

Location Site Noise Limit dB LAeq, 1h (freefield)

Lings Farmhouse 55



37

Home Farm Cottage 53 Rempstone Church 55

4 Loughborough Road 53 Beech Tree Lodge 54 Holy Cross Cottage 55

Rempstone Hall 55 Home Farm 50

The Lings Farm 50

Temporary operations would continue to operate at a level of 70 dB LAeq, 1 hour (free field).

1.10.10 Comments were raised through the public exhibition regarding reversing alarms from vehicles on

site. To mitigate potential reversing alarms the Company shall ensure all vehicles have white

noise alarms, introduce one way haul routes and where possible remove reversing alarms and

use alternative reserving safety measures. The Company recognises that as extraction moves in

an easterly direction it will become closer to the Parish Church and the site are happy to

accommodate when necessary sensitive working during certain Church services to maintain the

tranquil setting.

1.10.11 The proposed extension does not include the erection of any lighting. Should any lighting be

required further approval would be sought from the Mineral Planning Authority.

1.10.12 The proposed scheme has been assessed against bird strike potential from operations and

restoration, the following mitigations are proposed to reduce any significant impact;

• Planting at 4m centres

• Reedbed planting on lake margins

• Maintenance of grass at 200mm height

• Limited berry-bearing species

1.10.13 The following permission implements the following stand offs

A6006 – 35M (includes electricity line stand off)

Hedgerows – 3m

Sheepwash Brook – 15m

Beech Tree Lodge – 100m

Ash Tree – 13m



38



39

2.0 PART TWO (B) – PLANNING POLICY CONSIDERATIONS

2.1 INTRODUCTION

2.1.1 When determining planning applications the approved Development Plan policies are a material

consideration and planning authorities must have regard to these, and the extent to which the

proposal complies with them, when making its decision on whether or not to grant planning

permission.

2.1.2 An assessment of a proposal against the relevant planning policies allows the principle of the

development and its details to be properly assessed against planning policy objectives and

requirements. This in turn assists in balancing the impacts associated with a particular

development against the need for the proposal and its overall merits and benefits.

2.2 NEED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT

2.2.1 Nottinghamshire County Council falls within the East Midlands region. Nottinghamshire Annual

Monitoring Report identifies a land won sand and gravel apportionment figure of 2.65 million

tonnes per annum for the County (as stated in the Minerals Local Plan).

2.2.2 Nottinghamshire Minerals Local plan has 23 million tonnes allocated at 7 sites which were

expected to sustain a minimum 7 year landbank until 2015 based on sales continuing at

forecasted levels. The seven sites include Gunthorpe, Bleasby, Rampton, Sturton le Steeple,

Lound East, Mission – Finningley and Newington South. Of these allocated sites 5 have been

granted planning permission equating to approximately 13.95 million tonnes.

2.2.3 Nottinghamshire Local Aggregate Assessment 2013 provides an overview of the Counties

permitted reserves, production and landbank. Sand and gravel production between 2001 and

2011 has been varied and impacted by the economic climate. Production saw a high in 2004 with

3.37 million tonnes and a low of 1.27 million tonnes in 2009. Production has steadily risen since

2009 up to 1.71 million tonnes in 2011 which is still below the County apportionment of 2.65

million tonnes per annum.



40

2.2.4 There are currently 12 permitted sand and gravel sites in the county although only 9 are currently

active. The County landbank stood at 7.3y December 2011 which equates to 19.3million tonnes.

Utilising average sales between 2001 and 2011 the apportionment figure should be 2.58 million

tonnes which is slightly less than previous apportionment figures but above current production.

Sales over the last 3 years have been an average low of 1.51 million tonnes.

2.2.5 The proposed extension is not allocated and is therefore a departure from the existing Minerals

Local Plan. The current Minerals Local Plan provided allocated sites until the end of the plan

period 2015. The Company have put forward Rempstone extension area to be considered as

part of the emerging Local Development Framework but has not been formally approved as a

preferred site although it forms part of the recent consultation document. It is considered that

delay in the review of the Minerals Local Plan due to the changes in National legislation and new

Planning Policy Framework has prevented full consideration of Rempstone as an allocated site

leading to this departure. Although the proposed extraction area is a significant departure from

the existing local plan it meets the principles of sustainable development and National Planning

Policy Framework as an extension to an existing site.

2.2.6 It is proposed for Rempstone to come online in 2016 during the final stages of the permitted

extraction in Burton’s. The site would release 1.78 million tonnes over a period of 10-12y. The

commencement of Rempstone would be in the final years of the permitted landbank should

production levels rise to an apportionment figure of 2.58mtpa which would assist the Counties

supply of sand and gravel between 2016 and 2028 depending on market demand. Should

production remain below at the current average of 1.51 million tonnes per annum then

Rempstone could be seen as slightly premature as current permitted reserves would not be

below 7 years until 2018. National Planning Policy Framework states there should be a minimum

of 7y landbank it does not state a maximum it also states;

Longer landbanks may be appropriate to take account of the need to supply a range of types of

aggregates, locations of permitted reserves relative to markets, and productive capacity of

permitted sites.

2.2.7 Although reserves have been permitted at East Leake on, land known as Burtons, these reserves

would be depleted within 3 years. East Leake is the only sand and gravel quarry within



41

Nottinghamshire to serve the southern markets of Nottinghamshire and northern markets of

Leicestershire. With the closure of Holme Pierrepoint and Hoveringham quarries in 2004 and

2007 and the failure for Gunthorpe Quarry coming online there is only East Leake serving this

market. It is proposed that this extension would enable East Leake to continue operating and

supplying local markets.

2.2.8 Without the reserve contained within the application site existing operations will cease at the

quarry and the processing plant will be removed. In effect, the reserve will be sterilised from

being a high grade product. At any future point in time it could be excavated and sold

unprocessed ‘As Raised’ material for low grade specification uses such as bulk fill.

2.2.9 It is appreciated that the current landbank is currently over the required 7 years but it is

considered an increase to this figure to ensure the continuation of East Leake Quarry and the

effective use of the mineral reserve, be appropriate in the long term.

2.2.10 It is considered appropriate to bring this extension at East Leake Quarry now as it will continue to

supply an essential product to the southern markets of Nottinghamshire and northern market of

Leicestershire, utilise existing infrastructure and provide restoration benefits.



42

2.3 NATIONAL POLICY

2.3.1 The new National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was published on the 27th March 2012 and

is the principle policy document which sets out the overarching planning policy that shall be

implemented through the development plan and determination process. NPPF identifies a

presumption in favour of sustainable development. There are three dimensions to sustainable

development, economic, social and environmental, the planning system as a function should

perform a number of roles;

‘An economic role – contributing to building a strong, responsive and competitive economy, by

ensuring that sufficient land of the right type is available in the right places at the right time...’

‘A social role – supporting strong, vibrant and healthy communities by providing the supply of

housing required...’

‘An environmental role – contribution to protecting and enhancing our natural, built and historic

environment; and as part of this helping to improve biodiversity, use natural resources prudently,

minimise waste and pollution and mitigate and adapt to climate change including moving to a low

carbon economy.’

2.3.2 Sections 18 to 219 taken as a whole contribute to the definition of sustainable development which

includes the implications upon mineral extraction and reclamation.

2.3.3 The new planning policy framework does not move away from being a plan led system and that

the development plan should be the starting point of any decision making process and the NPPF

is a material consideration in determining any application.

2.3.4 The presumption in favour of sustainable development means; approving development proposals

that accord with the development plan without delay, and where the development plan is absent,

silent or relevant policies are out of date, granting planning permission unless – any adverse

impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits. The benefits

should be assessed against the policies in this framework taken as a whole; or as specific

policies in this Framework indicate development should be restricted.



43

2.3.5 There are 12 Core Planning Principles that underpin the decision making process which are

summarised below;

1) Plan-led

2) Be creative, enhance and improve the places people live

3) Proactively drive and support sustainable economic development and respond positively to

wider opportunities for growth, set out clear strategies for allocating sufficient land which is

suitable for development in their areas.

4) High quality design and good standard of amenity.

5) Take into account the different roles and character of different areas recognising the intrinsic

character and beauty of the countryside and supporting thriving rural communities.

6) Support the transition to a low carbon future in a changing climate. Taking full account of flood

risk and coastal change and encourage reuse of existing resource.

7) Contribute to conserving and enhancing the natural environment and reducing pollution.

8) Encourage the effective use of land.

9) Promote mixed use development and encourage multiple benefits from the use of land in

urban and rural areas, recognise that some open land can perform many functions (such as for

wildlife, recreation, flood risk, mitigation, carbon storage or food production)

10) Conserve heritage assets in a manner appropriate to their significance, so that they can be

enjoyed for their contribution to the quality of life of this and future generations.

11) Actively manage patterns of growth ...and focus significant development in locations which

are or can be made sustainable; and

12) Take account of and support local strategies to improve health, social and cultural wellbeing

for all, and deliver sufficient community and cultural facilities and services to meet local needs.

NPPF includes various sub headings which contribute to the definition of sustainable

development those of relevance to this development are summarised below;

2.3.6 Supporting a prosperous rural economy- Policies should support economic growth in rural

areas in order to create jobs and prosperity by taking a positive approach to sustainable

development, support the sustainable growth and expansion of all types of business and



44

enterprise in rural areas and promote the development and diversification of land-based rural

businesses.

2.3.7 Promoting sustainable transport – Transport policies have an important role to play in

facilitating sustainable development but also in contributing to wider sustainability and heath

objectives. All development that generates significant amounts of movements should be

supported by a Transport Statement or Transport Assessment. Plans and decisions should take

account of whether opportunities for sustainable transport modes have been assessed and if

improvements can be undertaken within the transport network that cost effectively limit the

significant impacts of development. Development should only be prevented or refused on

transport grounds where the residual cumulative impacts of development are severe.

Development should be located to efficiently deliver goods and supplies.

2.3.8 Requiring good design – Great importance is placed on the design of the built environment.

Good design is a key aspect of sustainable development and should contribute positively to

making places better for people.

2.3.9 Promoting healthy communities – As part of facilitating social interaction and creating healthy,

inclusive communities we should aim to deliver social, recreational and cultural facilities and

services the community needs. Access to high quality open spaces and opportunities for sport

and recreation can make an important contribution to health and well being of communities.

Polices should protect and enhance public rights of way and access.

2.3.10 Meeting the challenge of climate change, flooding and costal change – Proactive strategies

to mitigate climate change taking full account of flood risk coastal change, water supply and

demand considerations. Developments should be located in a manner which reduce greenhouse

gas emissions and actively support energy efficiency, landform, layout, orientation, massing and

landscaping. New development shall be planned to avoid increased vulnerability to the range of

impacts arising from climate change. Development should take account of the impacts of climate

change by; applying the sequential test, if necessary exceptions test, safeguard land from

development that is required for current and future flood management and use opportunities

offered by new development to reduce the causes and impacts of flooding. Development should

not cause flood risk elsewhere.

2.3.11 Conserving and enhancing the natural environment – The planning authority should

contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by; protecting and enhancing valued



45

landscapes, geological conservation interests and soils; recognising the wider benefits of

ecosystems services; minimizing impact on biodiversity and providing net gains in biodiversity

where possible reducing the decline in biodiversity; preventing new and existing development

from contributing to or being put at unacceptable risk or being adversely affected by unacceptable

levels of soil, air, water or noise pollution or land instability. Proposals should propose remediate

and mitigate despoiled, degraded, derelict, contaminated and unstable land where appropriate.

Account should be taken of the economic and other benefits of best and most versatile

agricultural land. Great weight should be given to conserving landscape and scenic beauty in

National Parks, the Broads and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty which have the highest

status of protection, taking into consideration wildlife and cultural heritage conservation. Planning

permission should be refused for major development in these designations except in exceptional

circumstances and where it can be demonstrated they are in the public interest and have assess

the need (including National considerations) impact upon local economy, cost and scope of

developing elsewhere or meeting the need in another way. Proposals should assess any

detrimental effect on the environment, landscape and recreational opportunities.

2.3.12 When determining planning applications the development should aim to conserve and enhance

biodiversity this may be undertaken through the implementation of adequate mitigation measures,

compensation. Proposed development on land within or outside of a Site of Special Scientific

Interest that has an adverse impact shall only be permitted where the benefits clearly outweigh

both the impact and the features which constitute the SSSI. Development proposals where the

primary objective is to conserve or enhance biodiversity should be permitted; opportunities to

incorporate biodiversity in and around development should be encouraged. Planning permission

should be refused for development resulting in the loss or deterioration of irreplaceable habitats,

including ancient woodland, loss of aged or veteran trees unless the need or benefit of the

development clearly outweighs the loss. Presumption in favour of sustainable development does

not apply where development requiring appropriate assessment is necessary.

2.3.13 Planning polices and decisions should aim to; avoid adverse impact by means of noise; mitigate

and reduce noise impacts. Take into account the presence of Air Quality Management Areas and

the cumulative impacts on air quality from any new development and individual sites in a local

area. Encourage good design to limit light pollution upon local amenity and nature conservation.

2.3.14 Conserving and enhancing the historic environment – A planning application should describe

the significance of any heritage assets affected including any contribution made by their setting;

the level of detail shall be proportionate to the assets importance and no more than is sufficient to



46

understand the potential impact of the proposal on their significance. Where a site on which

development is proposed includes or has the potential to include heritage assets with

archaeology interest local planning authorities should required developers to submitted an

appropriate desk-based assessment and, where necessary, a field evaluation.

2.3.15 When consideration is given to the impact of a heritage asset great weight will be given to

conservation, the more important the asset the greater weight should be given, significance can

be harm or lose through alteration, destruction of the heritage asset or development within its

setting. Substantial harm to a grade II listed building, park or garden should be exceptional.

Where a proposed development will lead to substantial harm to or total loss of significance of a

designated heritage asset it should only be permitted if the public benefits outweigh that harm or

loss.

2.3.16 Non designated archaeological assets of interest that are demonstrably of equivalent significance

to schedule monuments, should be considered subject to the policy for designated heritage

assets which include;

• The nature of the heritage asset prevents all reasonable uses of the site; and

• No viable use of the heritage asset itself can be found in the medium term through

appropriate marketing that will enable its conservation; and

• Conservation by grant-funding or some form of charitable or public ownership is

demonstrably not possible; and

• The harm or loss is outweighed by the benefit of bringing the site back into use.

Where a development proposal will lead to less than substantial harm to the significance of a

designated heritage asset, this harm should be weighed against the public benefits of the

proposal, including securing its optimum viable use.

2.3.17 Developers should record any heritage assets to be lost (wholly or in part) in a manner

proportionate to their importance and the impact, and to make this evidence (and any archive

generated) publicly accessible. However, the ability to record evidence of our past should not be

a factor in deciding whether such loss should be permitted

2.3.18 Facilitating the sustainable use of minerals – “Minerals are essential to support

sustainable economic growth and our quality of life ” . NPPF recognises the importance of

sufficient supply of material to provide the infrastructure, buildings, energy and goods that the

country needs and that minerals can only be worked where they are found. When proposals are

determined the following points shall be considered;



47

• Great weight shall be given to the benefits of mineral extraction to the economy

• Where practical provide for the maintenance of landbanks of non energy minerals from

outside National Parks, the Broads, Areas of Outstanding Beauty and World Heritage

Sites, Scheduled Monuments and Conservation Areas.

• No unacceptable adverse impacts on the natural and historic environment, human health

and aviation safety and take into account the cumulative effect

• Avoid noise, dust and particle emissions are any blasting vibrations through mitigation

and removal of sources and appropriate control levels.

• No peat extraction

• Provide for restoration and aftercare at the earliest opportunity to be carried out to high

environmental standards through planning conditions (bonds and financial agreements

shall only be sought in exceptional circumstances)

• Conserve mineral resources within safeguarding zones where possible so not to

constrain potential future use.

2.3.19 The local plan should provide for a steady and adequate supply of aggregate by preparing an

annual local aggregate assessment based upon a rolling average of 10y sales data and other

relevant data and all supply options (recycled sources). Landbanks should be a minimum of

7years within the local plan for sand and gravel and 10y for silica sand, crushed rock and 15y for

chalk and limestone and 25y for clay. Landbanks should provide a stock of permitted reserves to

support the level of actual and proposed investment required for a new or existing plant and the

maintenance and improvements needed.

2.3.20 Longer landbanks may be appropriate to take account of the need to supply a range of types of

aggregates, locations of permitted reserves relative to markets, and productive capacity of

permitted sites.

2.3.21 Planning Practice Guidance

The guidance document provides additional information on various planning and environmental

topics. Those considered pertinent to this proposal including environmental impact assessment,

minerals, flood risk, air quality, and noise to name a few all of which reaffirms detail as set out in

the National Planning Policy Framework.

2.3.22 As set out in the National Planning Policy Framework, minerals planning authorities are expected

to ensure that plan proposals do not have an unacceptable adverse effect on the natural or



48

historic environment or human health. Residents living close to mineral workings may be exposed

to a number of environmental effects and particular care should be taken in respect of any

conditions they attach to a grant of permission for working in proximity to communities.

Dust

2.3.23 The scope of a dust assessment study should be agreed with the minerals planning authority and

local planning authority. Such studies should be used to:

• establish baseline conditions of the existing dust climate around the site of the proposed

operations;

• identify site activities that could lead to dust emission without mitigation;

• identify site parameters which may increase potential impacts from dust;

• recommend mitigation measures, including modification of site design; and

• make proposals to monitor and report dust emissions to ensure compliance with appropriate

environmental standards and to enable an effective response to complaints.

Noise

2.3.24 Those making development proposals should carry out a noise emissions assessment, which

should identify all sources of noise and, for each source, consider the proposed operating

locations, procedures, schedules and duration of work for the life of the operation. Proposals for

the control or mitigation of noise emissions should consider:

• the main characteristics of the production process and its environs, including the location of

noise-sensitive properties;

• proposals to minimise, mitigate or remove noise emissions at source;

• assessing the existing noise climate around the site of the proposed operations, including

background noise levels at nearby noise-sensitive properties;

• estimating the likely future noise from the development and its impact on the neighbourhood of

the proposed operations;

• monitoring noise emissions to ensure compliance with appropriate environmental standards.

Noise standards

2.3.25 Noise levels shall be subject to a maximum of 55dB(A)LAeq, 1h (free field), and ensure levels do

not exceed the background level by more than 10dB(A). Normal working hours have been

identified as (0700-1900) and evening as (1900-2200) limits should not exceed background level

by more than 10dB(A) and night-time limits should not exceed 42dB(A) LAeq,1h (free field) at

noise-sensitive dwellings.



49

2.3.26 All mineral operations will have some particularly noisy short-term activities that cannot meet the

limits set for normal operations. However, these activities can bring longer-term environmental

benefits. Increased temporary daytime noise limits of up to 70dB(A) LAeq 1h (free field) for

periods of up to 8 weeks in a year at specified noise-sensitive properties should be considered to

facilitate essential site preparation and restoration work and construction of baffle mounds where

it is clear that this will bring longer-term environmental benefits to the site or its environs.

Stability in surface mine workings and tips

2.3.27 Appraisal of slope stability issues for new workings should be based on existing information,

which aims to:

• identify any potential hazard to people and property and assess its significance;

establish the basis for reserve calculation;

• identify any features which could adversely affect the stability of the working to enable basic

• Quarry design to be undertaken

Restoration and aftercare of mineral sites

2.3.28 Restoration and aftercare should be undertaken at the earliest opportunity to be carried out to

high environmental standards. This should include through provision of a landscape strategy,

restoration conditions and aftercare schemes as appropriate

Landscape strategy

2.3.29 A site-specific landscape strategy to accompany applications for either a new site or any

significant extension to an existing working site should include:

• defining the key landscape opportunities and constraints;

• considering potential directions of working, significant waste material locations, degrees of visual

exposure etc;

• identifying the need for additional screening during operations;

• identifying proposed after-uses and preferred character for the restored landscape.

2.3.30 Planning conditions for reclamation should be specific to the proposed site and should normally

be framed with the intended after-use in mind. They will vary according to the characteristics of

the individual site; the intended after-use; the type of mineral to be worked; the method of

working; the timescale of the working; the general character of, and planning policies for the area.

Aftercare schemes



50

2.3.31 The preparation of a successful aftercare scheme requires two levels of information from the

mineral operator:

• an outline strategy of commitments for the five year aftercare period; and

• a detailed programme for the forthcoming year.



51

2.4 LOCAL POLICY

Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

2.4.1 Nottingham Minerals Local Plan was adopted 5 December 2005, GOEM have saved a number of

policies under the 2004 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act which this development needs to

be considered in the context of.

2.4.2 M2.1 – Sustainable Development

Planning permission for mineral development will only be granted where it has been

demonstrated that the plan’s sustainable development objectives have, where appropriate, been

fully addressed.

2.4.3 M3.1 – Information in Support of Planning Applications

Planning permission for minerals development will not be granted unless sufficient information is

provided to enable a balanced assessment of all relevant factors. Such information should

include as appropriate details of, geology, design, routing etc as much information regarding the

proposed development should be included within the planning application.

2.4.4 M3.3 – Visual Intrusion

Planning permission for mineral development will only be granted where any adverse visual

impact can be kept to an acceptable level. Where appropriate, conditions will be imposed to

ensure that plant, structure, buildings and storage areas are:

a) located in such a position as to minimize impact on adjacent land;

b) kept as low as practicable to minimize visual intrusion;

c) of appropriate colour, cladding or suitable treated to reduce their visual impact;

d) satisfactorily maintained to preserve their external appearance;

e) removed upon cessation of extraction and the site restored to an acceptable level,

In addition, measures should be taken by sympathetic design and / or screening to void

unacceptable light intrusion caused by extraneous light from the development.

2.4.5 M3.4 – Screening

Where planning permission for mineral development is granted condition will be imposed to

ensure that screening and landscape proposal reduce visual impact. Such conditions should

where appropriate include:



52

a) measures to retain, enhance, protect and manage existing features of interest and value for

screening and their contribution to the reclamation of the site;

b) measures to screen the site by the use of walls, fencing, earth mounding and or tree and

shrub planting

c) details of the method of working and phasing to cause least visual intrusion;

d) details of the location form, number, species size, method of planting, site preparation and

any necessary measures for replacing plant material which fails following initial planting.

Where appropriate, screening proposals should maximise the potential to enhance the landscape

and wildlife potential through appropriate planting.

2.4.6 M3.5- Noise

Planning permission for minerals development will only be granted where noise emissions

outside the boundary of the mineral workings do not exceed acceptable levels. Where

appropriate conditions will be imposed to;

a) restricted hours of operations;

b) require the use of conveyors instead of dumper trucks;

c) sound – proof fixed and mobile plant

d) set maximum noise labels at sensitive locations

e) impose standoff distances between operations and noise sensitive locations

f) require the use of acoustic screening such as baffle mounds or fencing.

2.4.7 M3.7 – Dust

Planning permission for minerals development will only be granted where dust generation will not

lead to an unacceptable impact. Where appropriate conditions will be imposed to suppress dust

generation such conditions may relate to the;

a) layout of the site, design or stockpiles;

b) containment of conveyors and processing plant and dust collection equipment;

c) use of bowsers, sprays and vapour masts on haul roads stockpiles, transfer points

d) design of material – handling systems, drop heights, wind guards, loading points

e) use of binders on haul roads and stockpiles;

f) limiting on site vehicle speed

g) soil handling strategies

h) limiting levels of dust measures in a specific way; provision of monitoring facilities

The quarry undertakes dust suppression at present and would continue whilst the quarry is

operational.



53

2.4.8 M3.8 – Water Environment

Planning permission for minerals development will only be granted where;

a) surface water flows are not detrimentally altered

b) groundwater levels, where critical are not affected

c) there are no risks of polluting ground or surface waters

Unless engineering measures and / or operational management systems can adequately mitigate

such risks.

2.4.9 M3.12- Highway Safety and Protection

Planning permission for minerals development will only be granted where measures are in place

to the County Council’s Satisfaction that prevents damage to the highway and also prevents mud

and other debris material contaminating public highways. Such measures may include;

a) wheel cleaning facilities;

b) sheeting of lorries

c) metalling haul roads near their point of access to the public highway

2.4.10 M3.13 – Vehicular Movements

Planning permission for minerals development will only be granted where the highway network

can satisfactorily accommodate the vehicle movements likely to be generated and would not

cause unacceptable impact upon the environment and disturbance to local amenity.

2.4.11 M3.14- Vehicular Routing

In granting planning permission for minerals development the County Council will as appropriate;

a) impose conditions requiring the posting of site notices and / or the issuing or instructions to

lorry drivers detailing any routes to be avoided;

b) seek to negotiate planning obligations in order to secure highway improvements;

c) seek to negotiate agreements under section 111 of the Local Government (Miscellaneous

Provisions) Act 1972 in order to specify agreed vehicular routes

2.4.12 M3.17- Biodiversity

Planning permission will not be granted for minerals development which will adversely affect the

integrity of continuity or habitats or features identified as priorities in the UK and/ or Nottingham

Local Biodiversity Action Plan, unless an overriding need for development is demonstrated which

outweighs the nature conservation importance of the feature. If the loss of the habitat or feature

cannot be avoided, provision will be made, where practicable for the creation of an equivalent



54

habitat or feature, either on the development site or under the terms of a voluntary agreement on

a suitable alternative location within the County.

2.4.13 M3.19 – Sites of special scientific interest

Planning permission will not be granted for minerals development which would have an adverse

effect, directly or indirectly on the special interest of an SSSI or a candidate SSSI unless the

reason for the development outweighs the nature conservation considerations. The assessment

of any adverse impact will take account of the scope for mitigation and/ or compensatory

measures to replace the loss.

2.4.14 M3.20 – Regional and Local Designated Sites

Planning permission for minerals development in areas which are regional or local designated

sites will only be granted where it can be demonstrated that the importance of the development

outweighs the regional or local value of the site, taking into account measures to mitigate/

compensate against any adverse impact.

2.4.15 M3.21 – Protected Species

Planning permission for minerals development likely to cause harm to protected species or their

habitats will only be permitted of the protection and conservation of species can be secured by

condition or planning obligations or if there is an overriding need for the development. Planning

permission for mineral development will not be granted until a full survey of the affected species

has been carried out.

2.4.16 M3.22 – Landscape Character

Operators must demonstrate that landscape character and local distinctiveness are fully taken

into consideration within development proposals. Planning permission will not be granted for

minerals development which is likely to adversely impact upon the character and distinctiveness

of the landscape unless there are reasons of overriding public interest or where ameliorative

measures can reduce the impact to an acceptable level.

2.4.17 M3.24 – Archaeology

Planning permission will not be granted for minerals development which would destroy nationally

important archaeological remains and their settings, where scheduled or not. Planning

permission will only be granted for development which would affect archaeological remains of

less that national importance where it can be demonstrated that the importance of the



55

development outweighs the regional or local significance of the remains and where appropriate

provision is made for the excavation and recording of the remains.

2.4.18 M3.25 – Listed buildings, conservation areas, historic battlefields and historic parks and

gardens

Planning permission will not be granted for minerals development which would cause an

unacceptable level of harm to the character, appearance, condition or setting of conservation

areas, listed buildings, historic battlefields and historic parks and gardens.

2.4.19 M4.3 - Soil conservation and use of soil making materials

Where planning permission involves the reclamation of mineral workings, schemes should

include measures to ensure the proper identification of all soil resources and their characteristics,

together with other potential horizons within the mineral deposit that may be suitable for creating

a soil profile, in addition to stripping, storage and placement methods which ensure that the soils

are safeguarded for their intended afteruse. Where soils are absent or deficient, schemes should

be include measures to ensure that available vegetation cover can be established to achieve the

required after i.e. Such measures may include;

a) concentrating soils within area where they will provide most benefit;

b) utilising on-site, or imported soil making materials which with suitable treatment are capable

of supporting plant growth.

c) Volumetric estimates of the soil profile showing the amounts of topsoils, subsoils and

overburden stripped, stored and re-spread in conjunction with the proposed extraction and

restoration plan.

2.4.20 M4.4 Landscape Treatment

Where planning permission involves the reclamation of mineral workings landscaping proposals

will be required that include;

a) an overall landscape concept or brief;

b) details of the final landform which should harmonise with the existing landscape character

and aim to promote strategic landscape features;

c) the location, form, numbers, species, size and method of planting

d) details of establishment, maintenance and longer term management proposals, including

measures for replacing failed planting.

2.4.21 M4.9 – Aftercare



56

The County Council will attach aftercare conditions to all mineral planning permissions where

reclamation is to agriculture, forestry or amenity.

2.4.22 M4.10 After-use – details required and objectives

Where planning permission involves the reclamation of mineral workings, schemes should

include full details of the proposed after-use and be designed to maximize opportunity to enhance

the environment, biodiversity and amenity of the local community

2.4.23 M4.11 After-use – management and other agreements

The Company is committed to long term management through aftercare / management schemes.

2.4.24 M4.12 Agricultural After-use

Where planning permission involves the reclamation of mineral working to agriculture the County

Council will encourage such proposals to take full account of the Countryside Appraisal and Local

Biodiversity Action plan.

2.4.25 POLICY M6.2 Sand and Gravel Landbank

The County Council will endeavour to maintain a landbank of permitted reserves of sand and

gravel sufficient for at least 7 years extraction and also an adequate production capacity in order

that Nottinghamshire will meet its reasonable share of regional provision of aggregates

throughout the plan period.

2.4.26 POLICY M6.3 Sand and Gravel Extraction In Unallocated Land

Proposals for sand and gravel extraction falling outside allocated areas will not be permitted

unless it is evident that existing permitted reserves and the remaining allocations cannot sustain

an adequate landbank and processing capacity as provided for in Policy M6.2.

Nottinghamshire Emerging Core Strategy

2.4.27 Policy SP1 – Sustainable Development

1. When considering development proposals the Council will take a positive approach that

reflects the presumption in favour of sustainable development contained in the National Planning

Policy Framework. The Council will work proactively with applicants jointly to find solutions which

mean that proposals can be approved wherever possible, and to secure development that

improves the economic, social and environmental conditions in the area.



57

2. Planning applications that accord with the policies in this Local Plan (and, where relevant, with

policies in other plans which form part of the development plan) will be approved unless material

considerations indicate otherwise.

2.4.28 Policy SP2 – Biodiversity-Led Restoration

1. Restoration schemes contributing to the delivery of habitat creation targets within the

Nottinghamshire Local Biodiversity Action Plan and contribute to the delivery of the Trent Valley

Biodiversity Opportunity Mapping Project shall be supported where appropriate, unless the need

for non-biodiversity restoration can be clearly demonstrated.

2. Where appropriate, schemes will be expected to demonstrate how restoration will contribute to

the delivery of the Water Framework Directive targets.

3. Restoration schemes for allocated sites should be in line with the relevant Site Restoration

Brief.

2.4.29 Policy Sp3 – Climate Change

1. All minerals development, including site preparation, operational practices and restoration

proposals should minimise their impact on the causes of climate change for the lifetime of the

development. Where applicable development should assist in the reduction of vulnerability and

provide resilience to the impacts of climate change by:

a) Being located, designed and operated to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and move

towards a low-carbon economy;

b) Avoiding areas of vulnerability to climate change and flood risk. Where avoidance is not

possible, impacts should be fully mitigated;

c) Developing restoration schemes which will contribute to addressing future climate change

adaptation.

2.4.30 Policy SP4 – Minerals Provision

1. The strategy for the supply of minerals in Nottinghamshire is as follows:

a) Identify suitable land for mineral extraction to maintain an adequate and steady supply of

minerals during the plan period;

b) Give priority to the extension of existing sites, where economically, socially and

environmentally acceptable;

c) Allow for development on non-allocated sites where a need can be demonstrated; and

d) Ensure the provision of minerals in the plan remains in-line with wider economic trends through

regular monitoring.



58

2. All proposals for mineral development must demonstrate that they have prioritized the

avoidance of adverse social, economic and environmental impacts of the proposed development,

or make use of appropriate mitigation measures

2.4.31 Policy MP1; Aggregate Provision

To meet identified levels of demand for aggregate mineral over the plan period (2012-2030) the

following provision will be made;

49.02 million tonnes of sand and gravel

8.74 Million tonnes of Sherwood Sandstone

1.52 Million tonnes of Limestone

The County Council will make provision for the maintenance of landbanks of at least 7 years for

sand and gravel and Sherwood Sandstone and at Least 10years for Limestone, whilst

endeavouring to maintain a steady and adequate supply over the plan period.

Proposals for aggregate extraction outside those areas identified in policies MP2, MP3 and MP4

will be supported where it can be demonstrated there is an identified shortfall in the landbank.

2.4.32 Policy MP2; Sand and Gravel provision

An adequate supply of sand and gravel will be identified to meet expected demand over the plan

period from;

The extraction of remaining reserves at the following permitted sites;

SGk East Leake

The following extensions to existing sites and new Greenfield sites

MP2K East Leake East…

2.4.33 Policy DM1; Protecting Local Amenity

Proposals for minerals development will be supported where it can be demonstrated that any

potential adverse impacts on amenity associated with the following considerations are avoided

and or adequately mitigated to an acceptable level;

Visual Intrusion

Noise

Blast vibration

Dust

Air emissions

Lighting

Transport

Proximity to properties

Stability of the land at and around the site both above and below ground level



59

2.4.34 Policy DM2; Water resources and flood risk

Water resources

1 Proposals for minerals development will be supported where it can be demonstrated that;

Surface water flows at or in the vicinity of the site are not detrimentally altered;

Groundwater quality and levels where critical and are not altered;

There are no risks to polluting ground or surface waters;

Water resources, where required should be used as efficiently as possible

Flooding

Proposals for mineral development will be supported where it can be demonstrated there will be

no unacceptable impact on;

Flood flows and storage capacity

The integrity of function of flood defence or structures acting as flood defence

Local land drainage systems

Local communities

Where the opportunity exists restoration proposals should seek to incorporate flood risk reduction

measures e.g. flood plain storage, flood defence structures, land management land practices etc.

to benefit local communities

Proposals for mineral extraction that increase flood risk to local communities must be fully

mitigated

Proposals for minerals development should consider the potential for flood storage schemes to

be incorporated into restoration proposals to reduce future flooding issues.

Minerals development should include sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) to manage surface

water drainage.

2.4.35 Policy DM3: Agricultural Land and Soil Quality

Agricultural land

1. Proposals for minerals development located in the best and most versatile agricultural land

(grades 1, 2 and 3a) will only be supported where it can be demonstrated that:

a. There is no available alternative and the need for development outweighs the adverse impact

upon agricultural land quality; or

b. Proposals will not affect the long term agricultural potential of the land; or

c. Alternative land of lower agricultural value has considerations which outweigh the adverse

impact upon agricultural land quality.

2. Where alternative options are limited to varying grades of best and most versatile land, the

development should be located within the lowest grade.



60

Soil quality

3. Measures will be taken to ensure that soil quality will be adequately protected and maintained

throughout the life of the development and, in particular, during stripping, storage, management

and final placement of soils, subsoils and overburden arising as a result of site operations;

2.4.36 Policy DM4: Protection and Enhancement of Biodiversity and Geodiversity

1. Proposals for minerals development will be supported where it can be demonstrated that:

a) There will be no significant adverse impacts on habitats or species or, where impacts cannot

be avoided, adequate mitigation and/or compensation relative to the importance of the resource

can be put in place; and

b) They will not give rise to any significant effects on the integrity of a European site, either alone

or in combination with other plans or projects, as a result of changes to air or water quality,

hydrology, noise, light and dust and that any impacts identified can be mitigated.

2. Nottinghamshire’s biodiversity and geological resources will be enhanced by ensuring that

minerals development:

a) Retains, protects, restores and enhances features of biodiversity or geological interest, and

provides for appropriate management of these features, and in doing so contributes to targets

within the Nottinghamshire Local Biodiversity Action Plan; or

b) Appropriately mitigates for unavoidable adverse impacts on biodiversity and geology, with

compensatory measures used only as a last resort;

2.4.37 Policy DM5: Landscape Character

1. Proposals for minerals development will be supported where it can be demonstrated that it will

not adversely impact on the character and distinctiveness of the landscape unless there is no

available alternative and the need for development outweighs the landscape interest and the

harmful impacts can be adequately mitigated;

2. Restoration proposals should take account of the relevant landscape character policy area as

set out in the Landscape Character Assessments covering Nottinghamshire and, where

appropriate, the Areas of Multiple Environmental Sensitivity Study.

2.4.38 Policy DM6: Historic Environment


a) The development would protect and where appropriate enhance nationally important historical

assets and their settings;

b) The importance of the development outweighs the significance of any regionally or locally

important designated or non-designated heritage assets that would be directly or indirectly



61

affected by the development and where appropriate provision is made for the excavation and

recording of any affected archaeological remains;

2. No development shall take place within the archaeological resource area at South

Muskham.

2.4.39 Policy DM7: Public Access

1. Proposals for minerals development will be supported where it can be demonstrated this will

not have an unacceptable impact, including that upon the enjoyment of use, on the existing public

rights of way network whilst the minerals development is being undertaken.

2. Where this is not practicable, satisfactory proposals for temporary or permanent diversions,

which are of at least an equivalent interest or quality, must be agreed in advance of the

commencement of the proposal.

3. Improvements and enhancements to the rights of way network will be sought and where

possible public access to restored minerals workings will be increased.

2.4.40 Policy DM9: Highways Safety and Vehicle Movements/ Routeing


a) The highway network can satisfactorily and safely accommodate the vehicle movements,

including peaks in vehicle movements, likely to be generated;

b) The transportation of minerals would not cause unacceptable impact on the environment and

disturbance to local amenity;

c) Where appropriate, adequate vehicle routeing schemes have been put in place to minimise the

impact of traffic on local communities;

d) Measures have been put in place to prevent material such as mud contaminating public

highways.

2.4.41 Policy DM10: Planning Obligations

1. The County Council will seek to negotiate planning obligations as measures for controlling

mineral operations and to secure sustainable development objectives which cannot be achieved

by the use of planning conditions.

2.4.42 Policy DM11: Restoration, After-Use and After-Care

1. Proposals for minerals development will be supported where it can be demonstrated that the

scheme includes details to allow an appropriate phased sequence of extraction, restoration, after-

use and after-care which will enable long-term maintenance and enhancement of the

environment.



62

Restoration

2. Where it is impracticable to submit full restoration details at the planning stage proposals

should include:

a) An overall concept plan with sufficient detail to demonstrate that the scheme is feasible in both

technical and economic terms; and

b) Illustrative details of contouring, landscaping and any other relevant information as appropriate.

3. Mineral extraction proposals which rely on the importation of waste for restoration must:

a) Include satisfactory evidence that the waste will be available over an appropriate timescale in

the types and quantities assumed;

b) Provide the optimum reclamation solution; and

c) Provide evidence that it is not practical to re-use or recycle the waste.

After-use

4. Where proposals for the after use includes habitat creation, applicants will be required to

demonstrate how they contribute to the delivery of the Nottinghamshire

Local Biodiversity Action Plan and have regard to the biodiversity led restoration strategy.

5. Where proposals for the after use is agricultural, applicants will be required to make provision

for the retention or replacement of soils and any necessary drainage, access, hedges and fences.

6. The after-use will be required to have regard to the wider context of the site, in terms of the

character of the surrounding landscape and historic environment and existing land uses in the

area.

7. Where opportunities arise, after-use proposals should provide benefits to the local and wider

community which may include enhancement and creation of biodiversity and geodiversity

interests, linking of site restoration to other green infrastructure initiatives, enhanced landscape

character, improved public access, employment, tourism or provision of climate change mitigation

measures.

Aftercare

8. Restoration proposals will be subject to a minimum five year period of aftercare.

Where proposals or elements of proposals, such as features of biodiversity interest, require a

longer period of management the proposal will only be permitted if it includes details the period of

extended aftercare and how this will be achieved.

2.4.43 Policy DM12: Airfield Safeguarding (Bird Strike)

1. Proposals for minerals development within the following Airfield Safeguarding

Areas will be supported where the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed extraction,

restoration and after use will not constitute a hazard to air traffic:

a) East Midlands Airport;



63

b) Gamston (Retford) Airport;

c) Hucknall Aerodrome;

d) Netherthorpe Airfield;

e) Nottingham City Airport;

f) Robin Hood Airport Doncaster Sheffield;

g) RAF Scampton MoD Aerodrome;

h) RAF Syerston MoD Aerodrome;

i) RAF Waddington MoD Aerodrome.

Any new safeguarding area notified to the Council during the Plan period will also be

safeguarded.

2. All proposals within the safeguarding zones will be required to consult the relevant airfields.

Rushcliffe Replacement Local Plan

2.4.44 Under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, which brought in the system of Local

Development Frameworks (LDF), the policies in the adopted Rushcliffe Replacement Local Plan

(1996) would expire on the 27 September 2007 unless they have been formally saved.

2.4.45 The Secretary of State’s assessment of whether saved policies should be extended is based

upon the criteria set out in Planning Policy Statement 12 and the Department for Communities

and Local Government Protocol on saving policies. The Policies of the Rushcliffe Replacement

Local Plan (1996) which the Secretary of State proposes to save are as follows;

• ENV15 GREEN BELT.

• H1 HOUSING ALLOCATIONS.

• E1 EMPLOYMENT LAND PROVISION.

• E4 TOLLERTON AIRFIELD.

• E7 REDEVELOPMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SITES.

• E8 LANGAR AIRFIELD.

2.4.46 None of the saved polices have any direct relevance to the proposed extension to East Leake

Quarry.

2.4.47 Rushcliffe Borough Council Emerging Core Strategy includes polices enhancing biodiversity

(Policy 16) and Landscape (Policy 15). The Strategy also considers transport infrastructure /

travel demands, design and enhancing local identity and the spatial vision for Rushcliffe.



64

Policy Summary

2.4.48 Although the proposed application is a departure to the adopted Minerals Local Plan, the land is

being promoted in the forth coming Local Development Plan (Local Plan). The extension to sand

and gravel is considered a sustainable option to meeting the apportionment figures of the

County’s sand and gravel targets for the forthcoming plan period. The site would be an extension

to the existing quarry utilising existing infrastructure and mitigation measures already in place.

2.4.49 This application is to extend sand and gravel on land to the east of the existing plant covering an

area of 27.5h for additional period of 10-12y utilising existing infrastructure. To sterilize the

remaining reserve is not considered sustainable, existing infrastructure, services and local market

enable the continuation of extraction until all permitted reserves be exhausted as the most

appropriate course of action and sustainable development. The existing operations are

undertaken to a high environmental standard protecting, minimising and mitigating any adverse

impacts on the local environment and sensitive receptors. Restoration provides the opportunity to

develop water conservation whilst restoring part of the land to agriculture complementing the

existing landscape character.

2.4.50 The proposed scheme seeks to increase screening to that already permitted and to maintain

existing hedgerow and mature trees. No additional plant, buildings or structures would be erected

as part of the proposed development. The existing plant which is well screened would continue to

be used for the processing of material extracted.

2.4.51 The proposed extension to mineral workings should not cause a noise nuisance at sensitive

receptors. The site can demonstrated that current mineral operations do not cause any exceeded

noise levels and operations shall continue in a similar manner. The main noise source is the

A6006 which is representative in the noise report.

2.4.52 All surface water shall be collected on site and filter through the void and pumped to the existing

water management system. There are no chemicals to be stored on site that could pollute ground

or surface waters. All fuels are placed in concrete bases and bunded in line with Environment

Agency standards.

2.4.53 The proposed application would not increase impact upon traffic movements or vehicular access.

The site would continue to use the existing access, wheel wash and routing agreement. There



65

would be no increase in HGV movements to and from the site. It is considered that the existing

access is suitable to continue HGV movements subject to approved routing agreements.

2.4.54 The proposed development shall have a short to medium impact upon the local landscape and

cause some visual intrusion to upper view points along the A60 and A6006. It is considered the

long term landscape impact would be minimal through the reintroduction of agricultural land,

woodland and hedgerow. The site is not located on a SSSI or local Designated Area. The site is

of limited ecological value and any mitigation measures would be implemented to ensure no

protected species are affected. The final restoration has been designed taking into consideration

bird strike potential whilst also trying to achieve local bio-diversity action plan targets e.g.

woodland, hedgerow, field margins and reedbeds.

2.4.55 The extraction area is location within 1km of Stanford Hall and 200m of St Peter’s Church. The

site shall be subject to a watching brief approved by the Mineral Planning Authority and any

development shall be undertaken in accordance with that plan.

2.4.56 The proposed development shall take full regard to the correct measures of reclaiming the land

through DEFRA’s good practice guide to soil replacements. It is proposed that the site be

restored to agriculture and nature conservation. Once restoration has been completed the site

shall be managed for successful after-use.

2.4.57 The Company has taken into consideration mineral safeguarding of the surrounding British

Gypsum which is a finite resource of regional and national importance. The proposed sand and

gravel extraction and restoration shall not impede permitted British Gypsum reserves at East

Leake as the operation shall maintain the necessary standoff of 30-35m. The Company has

sought comments from British Gypsum and no objections have been raised and it is considered

both operations can operate with impacting the safety of the mine.



66

3.0 PART THREE (C) – SUMMARY

3.1 BENEFITS OF THE DEVELOPMENT

3.3.1 Quarrying is a traditional rural activity. The existing quarry directly employs a maximum of 6 full

time staff. The Quarry’s employees live within a close proximity of the quarry.

3.3.2 The application proposals are an extension of operations at the East Leake Quarry and would

enable retention of existing jobs for a further period of around 10-12years. The quarry would also

allow the continued supply of construction materials to the established local markets and thus

continue contributing to the local economy by way of providing the means for development to be

undertaken, the use of local services, payment of business rates and use of local contractors.

3.2 STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

3.2.1 As part of producing the application to extend mineral extraction at East Leake Quarry the

company presented the proposed scheme at a public exhibition at Rempstone Village Hall.

Neighbour notification letters were distributed to surrounding properties around the existing

quarry and proposed extension, and properties near the cross roads within Rempstone. Notices

of the exhibition were also displayed on public notice boards at East Leake Parish Council,

Rempstone Village Hall and the White Horse Public House Rempstone. Email notification was

also undertaken to local Councillor’s, Parish Councils and Nottinghamshire Parish Council.

3.2.2 The public exhibition was undertaken at Rempstone Village Hall on 20 May 2014 between 2-8pm.

Exhibition boards were displayed (as shown in App 12 ???of Volume 2 ES) and leaflets which

were also left for the following coffee morning. Approximately 25 people attended and the general

comments received included continued assess of Rempstone Right of Way FP1, reduction of

reserving vehicle alarms, continuation of plant within the current location and retention of soil

bund along Sheepwash Brook. No negative comments were received regarding current

operations, noise, dust or vehicle movements.



67

3.3 CONCLUSION

3.3.1 It is clear that this development offers consideration benefits. Extending the life of the existing

mineral extraction operations at the site ensures continued employment for quarry staff. It also

offers the best opportunity in terms of sustainable development as an extension takes advantage

of existing quarry infrastructure and proximity to the local markets of Nottinghamshire and

Leicestershire. Furthermore restoration of the site will significantly enhance the habitat quality of

the site increasing local biodiversity. It will also establish more diverse and consequently,

sustainable farming opportunities on site.

3.3.2 The proposed extension takes into consideration all material considerations and environmental

impacts and it is therefore considered that with suitable mitigation measures and best practice

there shall be no significant impact in accordance with planning policy.

3.3.3 Therefore the proposed development offers opportunity with many environmental and social

advantages that meet the key principles of Government aims for sustainable development.

Documents

EAST LEAKE QUARRY – REMPSTONE SAND AND 2014 GRAVEL