Upload
phoebe-bonner
View
30
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Earnings Surprises vs Earnings Revisions. Taco Bandito: Allen Born Mark Davidson Greg Dayko Stephanie Shayne Ed Shenkan. Overview. Comparison of Surprises to Revisions Implementation Results Why it Works? Caveats Taco Test. Description of Strategy. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Earnings Surprises Earnings Surprises vs Earnings vs Earnings RevisionsRevisions
Taco Bandito:Taco Bandito:
Allen BornAllen Born
Mark DavidsonMark Davidson
Greg DaykoGreg Dayko
Stephanie ShayneStephanie Shayne
Ed ShenkanEd Shenkan
OverviewOverview
Comparison of Surprises to Comparison of Surprises to RevisionsRevisions
ImplementationImplementation ResultsResults Why it Works?Why it Works? CaveatsCaveats Taco TestTaco Test
Description of StrategyDescription of Strategy
Earnings SurprisesEarnings Surprises:: Accounting- Accounting-Based Earnings Momentum Strategy Based Earnings Momentum Strategy that exploits market under-reactions to that exploits market under-reactions to earnings surprisesearnings surprises
Earnings RevisionsEarnings Revisions:: Accounting- Accounting-Based Strategy that exploits market Based Strategy that exploits market under-reactions to revisions in earnings under-reactions to revisions in earnings estimates.estimates.
Implementation-SurprisesImplementation-Surprises
Created portfolios for the months Created portfolios for the months March, June, September, December March, June, September, December 1990-19991990-1999 – Compute the Surprise (% differential of Compute the Surprise (% differential of
Actual EPS to Expected EPS)Actual EPS to Expected EPS)– Long: top 5 % Surprisers Long: top 5 % Surprisers – Short: bottom 5 % Surprisers Short: bottom 5 % Surprisers
Equal weighting in longs and shortsEqual weighting in longs and shorts Held portfolios for 6 monthsHeld portfolios for 6 months
Implementation-RevisionsImplementation-Revisions
Created portfolios for the months Created portfolios for the months March, June, September, December March, June, September, December 1990-19991990-1999 – Compute the Revision (% Change in Compute the Revision (% Change in
expected EPS)expected EPS)– Long: top 5 % Revisions Long: top 5 % Revisions – Short: bottom 5 % Revisions Short: bottom 5 % Revisions
Equal Weighting in Longs and ShortsEqual Weighting in Longs and Shorts Held portfolios for 6 monthsHeld portfolios for 6 months
ResultsResults
Long Short TotalEarnings Surprises 36.61% 0.51% 37.12%Earnings Revisions 17.54% -4.23% 13.31%Difference 19.07% 4.74% 23.82%
ResultsResultsEarnings Surprises Earnings Revisions
Win Factor 28 10
Positive Portfolios 33 28
Negative Portfolios 5 10
Maximum Gain 106.07% 87.90%
Maximum Loss -16.36% -43.64%
Std. Dev of Returns 31.19% 24.67%
Why it works?Why it works?
Prices of equities for companies Prices of equities for companies recently announcing earnings recently announcing earnings surprises are mispricedsurprises are mispriced
Investors under-react to changes Investors under-react to changes in earningsin earnings– Mean revertingMean reverting– Anchoring biasAnchoring bias
CaveatsCaveats
We used quarterly EPS estimates for We used quarterly EPS estimates for revisions - Not annual EPSrevisions - Not annual EPS
Quarterly changes could be impacted byQuarterly changes could be impacted by– SeasonalitySeasonality– Unusual circumstances/Extraordinary Unusual circumstances/Extraordinary
EarningsEarnings We only included stocks which are presently We only included stocks which are presently
in the S&P 500 (i.e. Yahoo instead of Laidlaw) in the S&P 500 (i.e. Yahoo instead of Laidlaw) Used IBES returnsUsed IBES returns
Taco TestTaco Test
To eliminate seasonality, To eliminate seasonality, compared earnings forecast for compared earnings forecast for same quarter of prior yearsame quarter of prior year
Taco Factor
Positive Portfolios 27Negative Portfolios 7Maximum Gain 68.45%Maximum Loss -46.48%Std. Dev of Returns 20.74%
Questions & AnswersQuestions & Answers