Upload
dominh
View
222
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Early Identification and Prevention of
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders: the
NIAAA Collaborative Initiative in Eastern
Europe
Early Identification and Prevention of
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders: the
NIAAA Collaborative Initiative in Eastern
Europe
Christina Chambers, PhD, MPH
Pediatrics and Family and Preventive Medicine
University of California San Diego
La Jolla, CA, USA
Christina Chambers, PhD, MPH
Pediatrics and Family and Preventive Medicine
University of California San Diego
La Jolla, CA, USA
Collaborative Initiative on Fetal
Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
(CIFASD)
Collaborative Initiative on Fetal
Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
(CIFASD)
�
��
�
�
��
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
��
Under-recognition of FAS/DUnder-recognition of FAS/D
� Difficulty in making the diagnosis, especially in the newborn period
� Lack of expertise among general pediatricians, or poor access to expert diagnostic teams to achieve consistent validity of diagnoses
� Lack of a clearly defined/distinct neurobehavioral phenotype
� Poor ascertainment of alcohol use by pregnant women
– Stoler JM et al J Pediatr 135:430-6 (1999)
– Elliott EJ et al J Paediatr Child Health 42:698-703 (2006)
– Elgen I et al Acta Pediatrica 96:237-41 (2007)
� Difficulty in making the diagnosis, especially in the newborn period
� Lack of expertise among general pediatricians, or poor access to expert diagnostic teams to achieve consistent validity of diagnoses
� Lack of a clearly defined/distinct neurobehavioral phenotype
� Poor ascertainment of alcohol use by pregnant women
– Stoler JM et al J Pediatr 135:430-6 (1999)
– Elliott EJ et al J Paediatr Child Health 42:698-703 (2006)
– Elgen I et al Acta Pediatrica 96:237-41 (2007)
Other unanswered questionsOther unanswered questions
� How much alcohol, when and in what pattern presents a risk?
� What factors (e.g., genetic susceptibility, nutritional factors, other exposures) increase or decrease that risk for FASD, and can we intervene to prevent or ameliorate the disorder during pregnancy?
� What methods can be used to provide earlier identification of affected children in support of earlier intervention and treatment?
� How much alcohol, when and in what pattern presents a risk?
� What factors (e.g., genetic susceptibility, nutritional factors, other exposures) increase or decrease that risk for FASD, and can we intervene to prevent or ameliorate the disorder during pregnancy?
� What methods can be used to provide earlier identification of affected children in support of earlier intervention and treatment?
Informatics
Stewart
Dysmorphology
Jones
AdministrativeRiley
Hull Thomas
Foroud
SowellM
att
son
Cham
bers
New
Sulik
Cudd
Zh
ou
New
Collaborative Initiative on Fetal AlcoholSpectrum Disorders (CIFASD)
Integration and translation among CIFASD
projects
Integration and translation among CIFASD
projects
C. ChambersAssessment of
Neonates
K. JonesDysmorphology
Core
S. MattsonBehavioral Phenotypes
E. SowellBrain Imaging
T. Foroud3D FacialImaging
Establishing
Standardized
Criteria
F. ZhouMouse Model
K. SulikMouse MRI
A. HullPrenatal
Ultrasound
T. CuddSheep Model
C. StewartInformatics
E. RileyAdmin
South AfricaSouth Africa
The diagnostic and research team in S.A., 1999
Prevalence of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Western
Cape Province, South Africa - Wave 3
Prevalence of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Western
Cape Province, South Africa - Wave 3
68.0 - 89.2/1,000Rate
55 FAS+18 FASDFinal diagnosis
30 FAS+78 DeferredPreliminary diagnosis
244 + 62Dysmorphology exam (Tier 2)
818Screened for growth (Tier 1)
1,013Total in 1st grade
Number of ChildrenCategory
May PA et al Drug and Alcohol Dependence 88:259-71 (2007)
ItalyItaly
Prevalence of Fetal Alcohol SyndromeLazio Province, Italy
Prevalence of Fetal Alcohol SyndromeLazio Province, Italy
3.7 - 7.4 per 1,000 FAS
20.3 - 40.5 per 1,000 FASD
Rates
4 FAS + 17 FASD + 1 ARNDFinal diagnosis
230Total dysmorphology exam
(Tier 2)
543Total evaluated (Tier 1)
1,086Total N in 1st grade
Number of ChildrenCategory
May PA Alcoholism Clin Exp Res 30:1562-75 (2006)
RussiaRussia
Fetal Alcohol Syndrome in Boarding Schools and Orphanages in Moscow
Fetal Alcohol Syndrome in Boarding Schools and Orphanages in Moscow
17 (8.9%)17190 (76%)218Orphanages for
Normal or Mildly
Delayed Children
N = 3
69 (12.3%)71561 (87%)648Orphanages for
Children with
Mental Deficiency
N = 7
27 (6.1%)35574 (76%)760Boarding Schools
for Children Mental
Deficiency
N = 5
Confirmed
Diagnosis
FAS
Preliminary
Diagnosis
FASChildren
Examined
Total
Number
ChildrenFacility
Marintcheva G et al Soc Clin Psychiatry 3:17-22 (2003)
Russia/Ukraine CIFASD Clinical ProjectRussia/Ukraine CIFASD Clinical Project
� Prospective cohort study involving moderate to heavily exposed pregnant women screened during routine prenatal
care and low/unexposed comparison women
� Prospective cohort study involving moderate to heavily exposed pregnant women screened during routine prenatal
care and low/unexposed comparison women
Investigators/CollaboratorsInvestigators/Collaborators
� Christina Chambers - UCSD
� Ken Jones - UCSD
� Claire Coles - Emory University
� Julie Kable - Emory University
� Carl Keen - UC Davis
� Jan Uriu-Adams - UC Davis
� Andrew Hull - UCSD
� Ludmila Bakhireva - UNM
� Lily Xu - UCSD
� Christina Chambers - UCSD
� Ken Jones - UCSD
� Claire Coles - Emory University
� Julie Kable - Emory University
� Carl Keen - UC Davis
� Jan Uriu-Adams - UC Davis
� Andrew Hull - UCSD
� Ludmila Bakhireva - UNM
� Lily Xu - UCSD
� Lyubov Yevtushok - Omni Net -Rivne, Ukraine
� Wladimir Wertelecki - U. So. Alabama
� Lela Kavteladze - Moscow Regional Institute of OB/Gyn
� Ludmila Joutchenko - Moscow Regional Genetics
� Anatoly Skalny - Center for Biotech Medicine, Moscow
� Pavel Ogurtsov -Friendship University, Moscow
� Lyubov Yevtushok - Omni Net -Rivne, Ukraine
� Wladimir Wertelecki - U. So. Alabama
� Lela Kavteladze - Moscow Regional Institute of OB/Gyn
� Ludmila Joutchenko - Moscow Regional Genetics
� Anatoly Skalny - Center for Biotech Medicine, Moscow
� Pavel Ogurtsov -Friendship University, Moscow
I. Spectrum of OutcomesI. Spectrum of Outcomes
– To measure the birth prevalence and range of alcohol-related physical features and neurobehavioral impairment among children born to women who consume moderate to heavy amounts of alcohol in pregnancy relative to children born to mothers who report consuming low amounts or no alcohol during pregnancy
� Three maternal interviews; biomarkers of exposure; banked DNA
� Physical examinations by specially trained neonatologists/geneticists
� Neurobehavioral testing at 6 m and 12 m
– To measure the birth prevalence and range of alcohol-related physical features and neurobehavioral impairment among children born to women who consume moderate to heavy amounts of alcohol in pregnancy relative to children born to mothers who report consuming low amounts or no alcohol during pregnancy
� Three maternal interviews; biomarkers of exposure; banked DNA
� Physical examinations by specially trained neonatologists/geneticists
� Neurobehavioral testing at 6 m and 12 m
II. NutritionII. Nutrition
– To evaluate the contribution of specific micronutrients to risk for various features of FASD
– To conduct a randomized intervention trial of multivitamin supplementation with or without choline supplementation to reduce alcohol-related effects
� Blood samples 2 times in pregnancy
� Random assignment to multivitamin/mineral supplement
� Random assignment to 700 mg choline supplement
– To evaluate the contribution of specific micronutrients to risk for various features of FASD
– To conduct a randomized intervention trial of multivitamin supplementation with or without choline supplementation to reduce alcohol-related effects
� Blood samples 2 times in pregnancy
� Random assignment to multivitamin/mineral supplement
� Random assignment to 700 mg choline supplement
FASD and cholineFASD and choline
� Prenatal choline deficiency leads to long-lasting
hippocampal dysfunction as well as memory and
learning impairments
� In rats, perinatal choline supplementation attenuates the adverse effects of alcohol on hyperactivity and
memory tasks
� complementary sheep and rat models in CIFASD
III. Earlier/Better DiagnosisIII. Earlier/Better Diagnosis
– To test training methods, imaging and
earlier/more sensitive neurobehavioral testing
measures to identify affected infants
� Repeated physical examinations
� Repeated prenatal ultrasound measures
� 2-D and 3-D facial photographs
� Repeated neurobehavioral testing
– To test training methods, imaging and
earlier/more sensitive neurobehavioral testing
measures to identify affected infants
� Repeated physical examinations
� Repeated prenatal ultrasound measures
� 2-D and 3-D facial photographs
� Repeated neurobehavioral testing
Final 3D model constructed from the highest confidence data points.
1.5 Milliseconds
3D - facial imaging3D - facial imaging
3-D facial imaging3-D facial imaging
Preliminary FindingsPreliminary Findings
Maternal interviews - RussiaMaternal interviews - Russia
0.2%Daily drinker most recent month
0.5%Daily drinker month of conception
35.5%Any alcohol most recent month
91.2%Any alcohol month of conception
28.2%Current smokers
13.1 (6.9)Gestational age at enrollment (wks)
25.2 (5.5)Age (years)
Mean (SD) or proportion
Characteristics
N = 1164 Women Interviewed
Any binge episodes - RussiaAny binge episodes - Russia
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Perc
en
t o
f E
ver-
Dri
nkers
Rep
ort
ing
at
Least
1 E
pis
od
e
5 or more 4 2 or 3
Number of Drinks per Occasion
Conception
In pregnancy
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Perc
en
t o
f E
ver-
Dri
nkers
Rep
ort
ing
at
Least
1 E
pis
od
e
5 or more 4 2 or 3
Number of Drinks per Occasion
Conception
In pregnancy
Number of binge episodesmonth around conception - Russia
Number of binge episodesmonth around conception - Russia
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Percent of Women
1 to 3 4 to 5 6 or more
Number of Occasions 4 or More Drinks
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Percent of Women
1 to 3 4 to 5 6 or more
Number of Occasions 4 or More Drinks
Number of drinks can ‘hold’ - RussiaNumber of drinks can ‘hold’ - Russia
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Perc
en
t o
f W
om
en
1 or 2 3 or 4 5 or 6 7 or 8 9 or more
Number of Drinks on an Occasion
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Perc
en
t o
f W
om
en
1 or 2 3 or 4 5 or 6 7 or 8 9 or more
Number of Drinks on an Occasion
Signs of abuse in last year - RussiaSigns of abuse in last year - Russia
16.9%
5.0%
23.4%
20.2%
22.6%
17.5%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Perc
en
t o
f W
om
en
CAGE TWEAK T-ACE
Number of Points by Screening Test
1 or more
2 or more
16.9%
5.0%
23.4%
20.2%
22.6%
17.5%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Perc
en
t o
f W
om
en
CAGE TWEAK T-ACE
Number of Points by Screening Test
1 or more
2 or more
Correspondence of signs of abusefor continued pregnancy drinking - Russia
Correspondence of signs of abusefor continued pregnancy drinking - Russia
<0.0014.45, 14.388.00guilt
0.0081.45, 12.194.21worry
0.660.19, 13.631.63eye opener
<0.0013.15, 15.256.93cut down
0.100.76, 20.593.94annoy
<0.0014.00, 72.1416.98amnesia
p-value95% CI
OR for continued drinking in
pregnancyQuestion
Correlation of maternal binge drinking with paternal drinking - Ukraine
Correlation of maternal binge drinking with paternal drinking - Ukraine
<0.0001
3.55, 20.71
12.20, 124.72
1.0
8.57
39.00
Quantity
1-2 drinks
3-4 drinks
≥5 drinks
<0.0001
4.89, 28.44
8.88, 118.59
1.79, 82.86
1.0
11.80
32.44
12.17
Frequency
<1 x week
1-2 x week
3-4 x week
Daily
p-value95% CI
OR for mother’s binge
drinking
(N = 166)
Partner
drinking
Alcohol related physical features in newborns -Ukraine
Alcohol related physical features in newborns -Ukraine
0.068
0.035
0.118
0.126
1.000
0.032
0.126
0.031
5 (9.1)
2 (3.6)
4 (7.3)
0
3 (5.5)
0
0
0
5 (9.1)
14 (21.2)
10 (15.2)
11 (16.7)
4 (6.0)
4 (6.0)
6 (9.0)
4 (6.0)
3 (4.5)
13 (19.4)
Palpebral fissures ≤10th centile
Smooth philtrum
Thin vermilion border
Hockey stick crease
Birth weight ≤10th centile
Birth length ≤10th centile
Birth head circumference ≤10th centile
FAS
Some features of FAS
p-value
No Alcohol
N = 55
Alcohol
Exposed
N = 67Feature - n (%)
Minerals in Binge-Drinking Women
vs. Unexposed - Russia
Minerals in Binge-Drinking Women
vs. Unexposed - Russia
3rd trimester
N = 20
1st/2nd trimester
N = 20
0.010.780.620.080.730.59Zn
0.150.140.110.170.130.11Se
0.3119.017.80.4919.018.1Mg
0.551.21.00.351.11.4Fe
0.042.62.00.412.42.2Cu
0.1996.888.80.3593.888.5Ca
P-valueAlc-Alc+P-valueAlc-Alc+Mineral
Prenatal ultrasound brain measures - UkrainePrenatal ultrasound brain measures - Ukraine
� Transverse Cerebellar Diameter
� Occipital Frontal Diameter
� Caval-Calvarial Distance
� Frontothalamic Distance
� Outer Orbital Distance
� Interorbital Distance
� Orbital Distance
� Transverse Cerebellar Diameter
� Occipital Frontal Diameter
� Caval-Calvarial Distance
� Frontothalamic Distance
� Outer Orbital Distance
� Interorbital Distance
� Orbital Distance
TCD
T
T
CCD
FTD
TCD
FTD
OODOOD
Fetal growth measures (2nd trimester)
FAS/some features vs. no FAS - Ukraine sample
Fetal growth measures (2nd trimester)
FAS/some features vs. no FAS - Ukraine sample
0.01062.5±2.247.0±5.4Femur length percentile
0.05343.3±3.227.2±7.6Abdominal circumference percentile
0.00641.9±1.828.5±4.4Head circumference percentile
0.23656.1±2.947.0±7.1Biparietal diameter percentile
0.10535.0±1.827.6±4.2Estimated fetal wt percentile
Mean±sdMean±sd
p-valueNo FAS
(n=121)
FAS/D
(n=21)
Fetal Growth Measures*
* All models adjusted for smoking
Fetal growth measures (3rd trimester)
FAS/some features vs. no FAS - Ukraine sample
Fetal growth measures (3rd trimester)
FAS/some features vs. no FAS - Ukraine sample
0.00551.9±3.630.9±6.3Femur length percentile
0.35054.2±3.547.3±6.3Abdominal circumference
percentile
0.00353.8±3.333.9±5.6Head circumference percentile
0.03366.7±4.248.9±7.0Biparietal diameter percentile
0.05433.4±2.324.2±4.0Estimated fetal wt percentile
Mean±sdMean±sd
p-value
No FAS
(n=120)
FAS/D
(n=21)
Fetal Growth Measures*
* All models adjusted for smoking
Fetal brain measures (3rd trimester)
FAS/some features vs. no FAS - Ukraine sample
Fetal brain measures (3rd trimester)
FAS/some features vs. no FAS - Ukraine sample
0.88016.9±0.316.8±0.4Orbital Diameter (mm)
0.30115.6±0.314.9±0.6Interorbital Distance (mm)
0.18055.5±0.654.0±0.9Outer Orbital Diameter (mm)
0.08066.3±0.763.9±1.2Frontothalamic Distance (mm)
0.12743.3±0.641.6±1.0Caval-Calvarial Distance (mm)
0.888107.8±1.5107.4±2.5Occipital Frontal Diameter (mm)
0.17841.9±0.540.8±0.4Transverse Cerebellar Diameter (mm)
Mean±s.e.Mean±s.e.
p-value*
No FAS
(N=120)
FAS/D
(N=21)
Brain Measure
* Adjusted for gestational age & smoking in pregnancy
ConclusionsConclusions
� Accurate diagnoses can be made in the newborn period offering opportunity for early intervention
� Nutritional factors may be important in FASD (and potentially modifiable)
� Prenatal ultrasound may have clinical relevance in identifying alcohol-affected fetuses in mid-gestation
� Accurate diagnoses can be made in the newborn period offering opportunity for early intervention
� Nutritional factors may be important in FASD (and potentially modifiable)
� Prenatal ultrasound may have clinical relevance in identifying alcohol-affected fetuses in mid-gestation
Future plansFuture plans
� Explore better maternal biomarkers
� Link early identification of high risk infants to initiation of early treatment
� Explore better maternal biomarkers
� Link early identification of high risk infants to initiation of early treatment