Upload
arthur-jacobs
View
40
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
EANET Monitoring Data for The Model Intercomparison Study. Kazuhide Matsuda Acid Deposition and Oxidant Research Center (ADORC). Introduction. The preparatory phase of Acid deposition monitoring network in East Asia (EANET) was carried out successfully. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
EANET Monitoring Data for
The Model Intercomparison Study
Kazuhide Matsuda
Acid Deposition and Oxidant Research Center (ADORC)
Introduction
• The preparatory phase of Acid deposition monitoring network in East Asia (EANET) was carried out successfully.
• “Report on the Acid Deposition Monitoring of EANET during the preparatory phase” was published in August 2000 with the monitoring data.
• After the preparatory phase, the regular phase was started from January 2001.
EANET sites in 2000
Classifications of EANET sites
• The data monitored in remote sites and some rural sites are suitable for validations of regional scale transport models.
– The year 2000
• Remote: 16 sites
• Rural: 8 sites
• Urban: 14 sites
Remote sites
Thana Rata, Malaysia
Cheju, Korea
Tarelj, Mongolia
Rural sites
Serpong, Indonesia
Los Banos, Philippines
Patumthani, Thailand
Available monitoring data
• The preparatory phase -open to public– Monthly averaged data (Apr.1998 ~ Dec.1999)– A lot of lack of data
• The monitoring data in 2000– The data set in 2000 is relatively complete. – The issue of data disclosure in the regular phase
will be discussed in the 3nd Intergovernmental Meeting held in November 2001.
Quality of monitoring data for wet deposition (1)
• Ion balance check (R1)
• Conductivity balance check (R2)
-80-60-40-20
020406080
100
0 1 10 100
Λ meas (mS/ m)
R2
(%)
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 10 100 1000 10000
C+A (μ eq/ l)
R1
(%)
Country Name of sites Sample(N) R1(N) R1(AA) % R2(N) R2(AA) % R1&R2(N)R1&R2(AA) %
China Chongqing
-Guanyinqiao 58 58 29 50 58 38 66 58 24 41
-Nanshan 21 20 9 45 20 9 45 20 4 20
Xi'an
-Jiancezhan 32 32 3 9 32 21 66 32 2 6
-Weishuiyuan 22 22 4 18 22 8 36 22 0 0
-Dabagou 32 32 2 6 32 18 56 32 1 3
Xiamen
-Hongwen 39 39 26 67 39 35 90 39 23 59
-Xiaoping 49 49 26 53 49 40 82 49 19 39
Zhuhai
-Jiancezhan 26 12 2 17 12 3 25 12 2 17
-Zhuxian Cavern -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Indonesia Jakarta 34 34 2 6 34 11 32 34 0 0
Serpong 50 37 3 8 37 16 43 37 2 5
Kototabang 121 121 112 93 0 0 -- 0 0 --
Bandung
Japan Rishiri 134 104 93 89 104 95 91 104 86 83
Tappi 229 178 172 97 178 178 100 178 172 97
Sado/(Sado-seki) 98 80 78 98 80 79 99 80 78 98
Happo 344 267 253 95 267 267 100 267 253 95
Oki 250 224 209 93 224 223 100 224 209 93
Ashizuri 188 187 182 97 187 187 100 187 182 97
Ogasawara 66 58 47 81 58 54 93 58 47 81
Kunigami 315 264 234 89 264 249 94 264 229 87
Ijira 14 14 11 79 14 14 100 14 11 79
Banryu 17 17 14 82 17 17 100 17 14 82
Republic Kanghwa 16 16 10 63 16 14 88 16 9 56
of Korea Kosan 15 15 9 60 15 12 80 15 7 47
Malaysia Petaling Jaya 66 64 37 58 35 34 97 35 30 86
Tanah Rata 52 51 7 14 17 17 100 17 4 24
Mongolia Ulaanbaatar 65 61 1 2 61 39 64 61 1 2
Terelj 67 58 11 19 57 47 82 57 11 19
PhilippinesMetro Manila 12 12 0 0 12 1 8 12 0 0
Los Banos 20 13 2 15 13 1 8 13 0 0
Russia Mondy 21 21 16 76 21 12 57 21 7 33
Thailand Bangkok 63 63 11 17 62 39 63 62 8 13
Samutprakarn
Patumthani 63 63 39 62 63 46 73 63 32 51
Khao Lam 40 37 13 35 36 18 50 36 7 19
Vietnam Hanoi 16 15 12 80 15 15 100 15 12 80Hoa Binh 16 15 14 93 15 15 100 15 14 93
Quality of monitoring data for wet deposition (1)
• Inter-laboratory comparison project– Round robin analysis survey of uniformly prepare
d artificial rainwater samples
14441525
18CA1828
1F29 1829
1B79 1878
18D8
17D8
1D881BC8
1EC8
1B8A
18C8
1648
1788
1FA9 1748
1434
-60 %
-45 %
-30 %
-15 %
0 %
15 %
30 %
45 %
60 %
Sample No.1 Sample No.2
SO42- (2nd Survey)
1D88
1434
1BC8
1788
1444
17D81829
1B8A
18C81828
18CA
1EC8 15251FA9
17481648
18D8
1B79 18781F29
-60 %
-45 %
-30 %
-15 %
0 %
15 %
30 %
45 %
60 %
Sample No.1 Sample No.2
1F2918D8
17D8
1B79
18C81444
14341525
1FA9
1648
1B8A
1EC8
18CA
1878
1829
1828
1748
1D881BC8
1788
-60 %
-45 %
-30 %
-15 %
0 %
15 %
30 %
45 %
60 %
Sample No.1 Sample No.2
• NO3- (2nd Survey)
• NH4+ (2nd Survey)
Applied methods for air quality monitoring in 2000
• Automatic monitoring method
– UVF (SO2) , CLD (NO, NO2) UV photometric (O3), TEOM, ray (PM) etc.
– China, Indonesia, Japan, Thailand• Filter pack method
– 4-stage filter pack method– Malaysia, Mongolia, Philippines, Russia, Viet
nam
Items of air quality monitoring in 2000
SO2 NO, NO2
NOx (*)
O3 HNO3, HCl, NH3
PM10 PMC
China ○ NO2
Indonesia ○ NO2
Japan ○ NO,NOx* ○ ○
Malaysia ○ ○ ○ ○
Mongolia ○ ○ ○
Philippines ○ ○ ○
ROK
Russia ○ ○ ○
Thailand ○ NO,NO2 ○ ○
Vietnam ○ ○ ○
Results of the monitoring in 2000
• SO2 concentration (monthly average)
– Urban• China 2, Japan 1, Mongolia 1, Philippines 1 , Thailand 2, Vietnam 1
– Rural• China 1, Indonesia 1, Japan 1, Philippines 1, Thailand 1, Vietnam 1
– Remote• Japan 8, Malaysia 1, Mongolia 1, Russia 1, Thailand 1
< 1 ppb
1 ~ 10 ppb
1 ~ 100 ppb
A topic of the year 2000
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0:00
13:0
0
2:00
15:0
04:
00
17:0
06:
00
19:0
08:
00
21:0
010
:00
23:0
012
:00
1:00
14:0
0
3:00
16:0
05:
00
18:0
07:
00
20:0
09:
00
22:0
011
:00
SO
2 co
ncen
trat
ion
[ppb
]
Sado Happo Yusuhara Ijira
• Extremely high concentration influenced by volcanic SO2 from Miyake Island volcano
12 ~ 24 September 2000
Rishiri
Sado
Oki
Yusuhara
Happo
Banryu
IjiraMiyake IslandMiyake Island
volcanovolcano
Tappi
Summery
• Availability of EANET monitoring data– 1998~1999 (opened)– 2000 (not opened yet)
• Quality of the wet deposition monitoring data
• Air quality monitoring– Automatic monitors and filter packs
• A topic of the year 2000– Eruption of Miyake Island volcano