EaglE County SChool DiStriCt 2016 FaCility MaStEr Plan

EaglE County SChool DiStriCt2016 FaCility MaStEr Plan

2016 FaCility MaStEr Plan2

The Board of Education of the Eagle County School District would like to thank all members of the Eagle County School’s community who

contributed to the preparation of this Facility Master Plan.

ECS Board of EducationKate Cocchiarella, PresidentTessa Kirchner, Vice President

Shelly Jarnot, Secretary / TreasurerFelicia BattlePatrick Hirn

Carolyn Knox KeepKevin Kottenstette

General Advisory CommitteeDr. Jason Glass, Superintendent of SchoolsPhilip Qualman, Assistant SuperintendentSandra Mutchler, Chief Financial Officer

Tammy Schiff, Chief Communications OfficerChris Madison, Director of ESS

Shelly Smith, Director of Early ChildhoodTodd Shahan, Chief Technology Officer

Diana Scott, Director of FacilitiesTiffany Dougherty, Principal, EVES

Greg Doan, Principal, EVHSScott Green, Community member

aCknowlEDgEMEntS

Facility Master Plan Preparation:

Braun Associates, Inc. Tom Braun

Tim Halbakken

TAB Associates, Inc. Greg MacikTab Bonidy

Security Advisor CommitteePhilip Qualman, Asst. Supt. of St. Support Services

Sandra Mutchler, Chief Financial OfficerTammy Schiff, Chief Communications Officer

Chris Madison, Director of ESSTodd Shahan, Chief Technology Officer

Diana Scott, Director of FacilitiesHeidi Hanssen, Principal, Edwards Elementary

Eric Mandeville, Vice Principal, EVHSKatie Jarnot, Principal, Eagle Valley Middle

Barry Smith, Emergency Management Director, Eagle County

Tad Degen, SRO/Patrol Deputy, Eagle County Sheriff

DepartmentTechnical Advisory Committee

Sandra Mutchler, Chief Financial OfficerTodd Shahan, Chief Technology Officer

Stan Lake, ECSD, IT ManagerBrian Brugger, ECSD, Sr. Systems Admin.Diana Scott, ECSD, Director of Facilities

David Russell, Principal, GCMS

Maintenance Advisory CommitteeSandra Mutchler, Chief Financial Officer

Diana Scott, Director of FacilitiesRobert Parish, Principal BMHS

Roy Getchell, Principal, Avon ElementaryECSD Maintenance Department Staff

Chuck Silkman, Ameresco

2016 FaCility MaStEr Plan 3

Facility Master Plan (FMP)fə-ˈsi-lə-tē ˈmas-tər ˈplan (noun)

1. A long term vision for capital improvements and facility management initiatives

2. A tool for decision making regarding facility needs deemed necessary to support academic goals

3. A document that evaluates the condition of existing facilities, provides demographics and enrollment forecasts, identifies the need for new facilities and outlines

recommendations for future actions

4. A living document to be reviewed and updated on a regular basis


1. introDuCtion 1 The Purpose and Need for a Facility Master Plan Main Elements of the Facility Master Plan How the Facility Master Plan will be Used

2. ExECutivE SuMMary 4

3. ContExt 6 Background on Eagle County Schools Process of Preparing the Facility Master Plan

4. guiDing PrinCiPlES 11

5. invEntory oF SChoolS anD 15 DiStriCt FaCilitiES School and Facility Inventories Needs List and Priorities District-Wide Initiatives Summary of School Conditions

tablE oF ContEntS

6. DEMograPhiCS/EnrollMEnt ForECaStS 23 Purpose and Need for Demographic Report Approach and Methodology Influence of New Residential Development Historic Enrollment Trends and Existing Enrollments Findings

7. lanD rESourCES 29

8. rECoMMEnDationS 32 Near-Term Improvements Long-Term Improvements Land Resources Facility Master Plan Implementation

9. aPPEnDix 41 1. Building Fact Sheets 2. Eagle County School District Building Capacity Study, 2012, TAB Associates, Inc. 3. Eagle County School District Facilities Energy Assessment Report, Ameresco 4. Eagle County School District Demographics and School Facilities Data, December 2015, Western Demographics, Inc.


1. introDuCtion

thE PurPoSE anD nEED For a FaCility MaStEr Plan nology programs are consistent with contemporary standards. Finally, the District was interested in understanding enrollment projections and the potential need to increase school capaci-ties in the future.

Eagle County voters have a long history of supporting ECS’s facility needs and over the years this has allowed the District to upgrade schools, build new schools, invest in new technology and make other facility improvements. With the support of the community, ECS has been able to offer high quality facilities and educational opportunities. This FMP provides a framework for addressing the District’s school and facility needs and is in-tended to ensure that decisions regarding schools and facilities are aligned with the priorities of both the District and the com-munity.

The FMP is a working document that:• identifies the physical condition, lifespan and need for improvements to existing schools and facilities, • forecasts future enrollment projections and outlines strategies for addressing future capacity needs,• recommends improvements that should be made to existing schools and District facilities, and new schools and facilities that will be needed in the future, and• recommends how District lands can be utilized to address future needs.

The foundation of this Plan is found in seven Guiding Principles outlined in Chapter 4. These Guiding Principles express the vi-sion and values of the Board of Education relative to the Dis-trict’s schools and the role they play in academic achievement. Each of the recommendations for facility improvements out-lined herein is intended to further one or more of these Guiding Principles.

Eagle County Schools (ECS) initiated work on a facility mas-ter plan (FMP or Plan) for one very simple reason – to ensure that the District’s schools and related facilities provide quality environments necessary to further its mission of educating the youth of Eagle County. Simply stated, a quality building is safe, secure, attractive, engaging and is equipped to support con-temporary learning methods. This type of environment creates the best opportunity for providing a quality educational experi-ence.

A number of other factors contributed to the need for ECS to prepare a facility master plan. Foremost among these was the age of many District schools and recognition of the need to address maintenance and other building deficiencies to extend the longevity and health of these buildings. The District also wanted to ensure that energy conservation, security and tech-

Eagle County School District . . . . . what we do:• Wecareforourstudents• Weofferourstudentsandstaffasafe environmentforlearning• Welookfornewwaystoengagestudentsin learning,parentswiththeDistrict,andthe communityforsupportofournoblemission• Mostimportantly,weignitecuriosity,openeyes, fuelconfidence,protectinnocence,feed intelligence,createjoy,softensadness,stimulate creativity,andpreparechildrenforadulthood

Educationisaloftygoal,butthat’swhatwedo

Dr.JasonGlassAGloballyInspiredVisionforEagleCountySchools

1


1. introDuCtion

The need for school and facility improvements was determined two ways. Inventories of all existing schools and facilities were completed to identify deficiencies and improvements neces-sary to further the life of these buildings. Future enrollment projections were prepared to determine the need to increase school capacities. These needs were then evaluated based on the Guiding Principles in order to define appropriate solutions. For example, Guiding Principle #6 addresses equity, that the Dis-trict believes all teachers and students should be provided with equivalent access to quality school facilities and quality aca-demic programing and technology. To further this principle, many recommended improvements are intended to establish equity between schools.

The District’s schools and other facilities are the focus of this Plan. While there is a clear relationship between buildings and academic programming, curriculum, teaching methods and other District programs and initiatives, this Plan addresses facili-ties only. Information on programing, curriculum, educational methods, etc., can be found in other District initiatives and plans, such as the District’s Strategic Plan.

Main ElEMEntS oF thE FaCility MaStEr PlanThe FMP is comprised of seven major sections:

ContextThis section provides background information on the ECS and the process used to prepare this FMP.

Guiding PrinciplesThe FMP is based in large part on Guiding Principles that define the District’s values regarding schools and facilities. These seven Guiding Principles are described in this section.

Inventory of Schools and District FacilitiesA comprehensive inventory of all existing schools and facilities, along with priorities for needed improvements is provided in this section.

Demographics/Enrollment ForecastsWestern Demographics Inc. was retained to evaluate demo-graphic trends in Eagle County and to forecast the future enroll-ment for all District schools. A summary of this analysis is pro-vided in this section. A copy of the complete report is found in the appendix

Land ResourcesThis section summarizes the District’s land holdings and how these lands could be used to support future school and facility needs.

Recommendations Recommendations for implementing improvements to schools and district facilities, alternatives for addressing future school capacity needs, strategies for the use of District lands and other considerations are provided in this section.

AppendixThere is a great deal of supplemental information that was used in the preparation of this plan. This material is provided in the appendix of this plan.


how thE FaCility MaStEr Plan will bE uSEDThe FMP provides a vision for how school renovations, expan-sions, new construction and other improvements can be imple-mented in order to meet the District’s school and facility needs. The Plan provides a strategy for guiding future decision-making and it will be an important resource for District Staff, the Board of Education and the community in making future decisions on capital improvements and to ensure that decisions are aligned with District priorities and that they utilize resources efficiently and effectively.

The FMP provides both near-term and long-term recommenda-tions for building improvements. The recommendations of the FMP are at a “master plan level”; they are general in nature and as such will require more detailed study and analysis prior to implementation.

The recommendations outlined in this Plan define the District’s goals for facilities and improvements that will be needed in the future. They represent the District’s preferred solutions for schools and facilities. Subsequent to this Plan, discussion of when and how to fund these improvements will be necessary. This will involve evaluation of financing alternatives and the District’s bonding capabilities, guaging the communities support for improvements and many other considerations.

This Facility Master Plan represents the first step in the process of implementing school improvements. The Plan is a starting point to be used in the evaluation and planning for potential bond elections that may occur in the future. As a living document, the FMP should be updated on a periodic basis as conditions change or the District’s needs change.

1. introDuCtion


2. ExECutivE SuMMary

Eagle County Schools initiated work on a facility master plan to ensure that the District’s schools and facilities provide quality en-vironments necessary to further the District’s mission of educat-ing the youth of Eagle County. The Plan provides recommen-dations for improvements necessary to maintain and enhance existing schools and buildings, for the construction of new and expanded schools and facilities and for the future use of District lands. Work on the FMP was initiated in March of 2015 and in-volved participation from District Staff, four sub-committees and the community.

Guiding PrinciplesSeven Guiding Principles were adopted and used as a basis for determining recommendations for future improvements to schools and facilities. These Guiding Principles are statements regarding the District’s values and vision for schools and facilities and addressed the following topics:• Providing a healthy, safe and secure environment for learning is of utmost importance.• Acknowledge that the quality of school environments affect student achievement.• Environmental sustainability should be considered in the design, construction and operation of District facilities.• School enrollments should be within a schools defined functional capacity.• Provide school capacities capable of accommodating current and future enrollments.• Equity in schools and school facilities is a core value.• Foster public input in the decision-making process for schools and facilities.

School and Facility InventoriesA comprehensive evaluation of all existing facilities identified the need for extensive maintenance and enhancement to ex-isting facilities. Improvements were prioritized as 1-4, with Priority 1 being improvements with the most immediate need to be ad-dressed and Priority 4 being the least time sensitive. District-wide initiatives include security, technology and energy efficiency.

Enrollment Projections/Future Capacity NeedsAn updated demographic and enrollment projection report was completed. This report found that ECS has experienced an average annual enrollment growth of 2.45% over the past ten years and enrollment growth is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. Other findings of this study include: • Over the next eight years the western end of the County is expected to experience significant enrollment growth while enrollment will remain relatively flat or decline in the eastern end of the County.• By 2023 significant capacity shortfalls are expected at Eagle Valley Elementary, Eagle Valley Middle and Eagle Valley High School.• Minor capacity shortfalls are expected at Red Hill Elementary and Homestake Peak.• Aside from schools mentioned above, enrollment growth over next 8 years should be accommodated by existing schools.

Facility Master Plan RecommendationsRecommendations are presented for Near-Term and Long-Term improvements. Recommendations address improvements to existing schools and facilities, the need for new or expanded schools and for how the District should utilize its existing land resources.

Near-Term Improvements1. Implement Priority 1 and 2 improvements to: Avon Elementary Battle Mountain High Berry Creek Middle Brush Creek Elementary Edwards Elementary Gypsum Elementary Homestake Peak June Creek Elementary VSSA East Bus Barn and Chambers Road Admin Building


2. Replace Red Sandstone Elementary School3. Replace Eagle Valley Elementary School4. Replace Eagle Valley Middle School5. Construct a new Red Canyon High School West6. Expand Eagle Valley High School7. Expand Red Canyon High School East8. Create a centralized “Operations Hub” for transportation, technology and maintenance9. Pursue alternatives for addressing staff housing needs.10. Other improvements, i.e. water tank at Maloit Park and Valley Road improvements in Gypsum.

Potential Long-Term Improvements1. Implement Priority 3 and 4 improvements to existing schools and facilities2. Construct a new school at the Haymeadow parcel in Eagle3. Expand Homestake Peak School in Eagle-Vail4. Convert Gypsum Elementary to house high school programs 5. Construct a new elementary school at the IK Bar parcel in Gypsum (as a replacement for Gypsum Elementary School)6. Construct a 3rd elementary school at the Buckhorn parcel in Gypsum

2. ExECutivE SuMMary


3. ContExt

baCkgrounD on EaglE County SChoolS

About Eagle County SchoolServingPre-Kthrough12thgradestudentsfromVailtoDotsero,includingMcCoyandBond,EagleCountySchoolsisaninnova-tivedistrictcomprisedof830professionalsengagingnearly6,900students.Ourvisionistoprepareallofourstudentstobeglob-al-readygraduates,whowillbesuccessfulintheircareersorcollegeexperienceandcontributetotheircommunitiesinpositiveandeffectiveways.TheDistrictbenchmarksinternationaltopperformingschoolstomodelpracticesthatleadtosuccessforallstudents.Webelievethattheonlywaytoimprovelearningoutcomesforstudentsisthroughbetterinstruction.Consequently,wefocusoureffortsonaninstructionalcoreofeducators,learners,andstandards.Allactions,initiatives,andeffortsareviewedthroughthislenswiththeexpectationthattheymustshapeoneofthesethreetenetsinordertobeeffective.

Our Mission WeteachthechildrenofEagleCountytohavecreativeandactiveminds,compassionforothers,enthusiasmforlifelonglearn-ing,andthecouragetoactontheirdreams.

Awards & RecognitionEagleValleyHighSchoolrankedinthetop10%ofhighschoolsacrossthenationforcareerandcollegereadiness.TheDistricthashadthreePrincipalsoftheYearinColorado,oneSuperintendentoftheYear,andoneEnglishLanguageDirectoroftheYear.OurschoolshavebeenrecognizedasNationalBlueRibbonSchools,JohnIrwinSchoolsofExcellence,andwiththeGov-ernor’sDistinguishedImprovementawardfromtheColoradoDepartmentofEducation.

DemographicsOurstudentpopulationisdiverseinbothdemographicsandeconomicbackground.With34.6%ofstudentsbeingEnglishLan-guageLearnerscomparedwiththestateaverageof14.4%,wearealsouniquelypositionedtoevolveintoaduallanguagedistrictwithbi-lingualgraduatessupportingourvisionofinternationalcompetitiveness.WhilegeographicallypositionednearaffluentcommunitieslikeVailandBeaverCreek,42.2%ofourstudentsqualifyforfreeandreducedlunch.Ourschoolsandstudentsaresupportedby:PTAs,localnon-profitfoundations,youthservices-focusedorganizations,andavarietyofprivate-publicpartnershipsandindividualphilanthropists


For many years ECS was a small, rural school district with a hand-ful of schools in the towns of Eagle and Gypsum in the Eagle River Valley along with small schools in the towns of Minturn, Red Cliff and Bond. As the County’s resort economy took hold in the 1970’s and grew rapidly in the 1980’s, the District expanded school capacities as necessary to accommodate the County’s growing permanent population. During this time the voters of Eagle County expressed their support of education by voting to approve a number of bond elections to construct new schools and to renovate existing schools. The past four bond elections allowed for the construction of the following new schools (along with other renovations, additions, and District-wide improve-ments to security, technology, etc.):

1990 BondEdwards ElementaryGypsum Elementary

1995 BondAvon ElementaryBerry Creek Middle

1999 BondBrush Creek ElementaryRed Hill ElementaryGypsum Creek Middle

2006 BondRed Canyon High June Creek ElementaryBattle Mountain HighEagle Valley High (renovation)

Enrollment growth continues to this day. Over the past 10 years PK-12 enrollment in ECS schools averaged 2.45% growth annu-ally. Notwithstanding the effects of the economic downturn, in the past five years enrollment has grown at a solid 2% rate. Growth in student enrollment is expected to continue and one of the underlying purposes of this FMP is to identify when and where the District will need to increase school capacities.

The diagram on the following page depicts all existing ECS schools. Refer to Chapter 7 of this Plan for additional information on ECS schools.


3. ContExt


3. ContExt

ProCESS oF PrEParing thE FaCility MaStEr Plan This facility master planning process was initiated in March of 2015 and this Plan is the result of analysis and synthesis of data, input from District staff, community input and other internal and external drivers. The chart below depicts the pro-cess used in the preparation of this Plan.

Below is a summary of each of the four major steps taken in the preparation of this plan.

1. Data Gathering and AnalysisThe gathering and analysis of data and informa-tion in support of this Plan involved the following steps:

Inventory of Existing Schools and FacilitiesA comprehensive evaluation of all District schools and facilities was completed to determine the condition of buildings and to identify needed improvements. The product of these evalua-tions was a Needs List of improvements for each building. Refer to Chapter 5 of this Plan for more information on school and building inventories.

Demographics and Enrollment ProjectionsA demographic and enrollment study was com-pleted in order to forecast future school enroll-ments and to understand the need for new school facilities that may be necessary in the future.

Land ResourcesThe District’s land resources were evaluated rela-tive to their ability to accommodate the develop-ment of new schools at some point in the future.


3. ContExt

2. FMP CommitteesFour committees were formed to guide the development of this Plan. Over the course of the past ten months these committees held numerous meetings to evaluate issues, discuss alterna-tive ideas and ultimately define the recommendations that are reflected in this Plan. The General Advisory Committee (GAC) was responsible for reviewing all major elements of this Plan and for providing their recommendations to the School Board. The Security Advisory Committee reviewed current and long term security needs and defined the District’s standards and expectations for security. The Technology Advisory Commit-tee reviewed current and long term technology needs neces-sary to support the District’s educational strategies and tactics and established the District’s standards and expectations for technology. The Maintenance Advisory Committee reviewed current and long-term maintenance needs, identified sustain-ability issues and defined the District’s standards and expecta-tions regarding maintenance. Each of these committees also provided input on the Needs Lists for each school and District facility.

A total of 10 committee meetings were held during the course of this planning process.

3. Community OutreachCommunity outreach was an important part of this planning process. Two community meetings held in November of 2015. A meeting at Battle Mountain High School focused on the eastern end of the Valley and a meeting at Eagle Valley High School focused on the western end of the Valley. These meet-ings included presentations on the facility planning process and provided opportunities for the community to ask questions and provide comments on the Plan. Child care and Spanish inter-pretation was provided at both of these meetings. Informa-

tion on the FMP was provided to individual schools where it was made available to parents and school staff. The ECS web page including information on the FMP and how to provide input.

4. Preparation and Review of PlanA draft of the FMP was prepared and presented to the GAC for their review and comment. Following the GAC review, the FMP was presented to the Board of Education for “worksession” level discussions and formal adoption.


4. guiDing PrinCiPlES

Guiding Principles were established early in the facility master planning process. Guiding Principles express the District’s values relative to school facilities and the important role they play in educating the youth of Eagle County. These principles provided a basis for determining recommendations for future school and facility improvements. Following each Guiding Principle is po-tential explanation of what of the guiding principle means and strategies for how they can be addressed.

GUIDING PRINCIPLE #1Incorporate best practices in the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of District facilities in re-gards to the health, safety and security of students and staff.

A fundamental goal of this Plan is to ensure that the District provides a healthy, safe and secure environment for learning. Providing such an environment is critical to the success of both teachers and students and this is one of the District’s foremost priorities. Quality environments for learning will be achieved by incorporating health, safety and security considerations into the design, construction and operation of District facilities.

Strategies for addressing Guiding Principle #1 include:• Facilities are designed to prevent or mitigate potentially critical situations – i.e. secure doors/access control systems, perimeter fencing, exterior lighting.• Facilities include up to date communication systems, monitoring/surveillance systems, backup electric systems.• Conduct periodic security and safety audits of all schools.• Engage District maintenance and operations staff in the design and construction process of facility improvements to ensure the long term maintenance of facilities is considered during this process.• Maintain building systems (HVAC equipment, roofs, windows and doors) to ensure indoor air quality.• Monitor changes to local health codes related to food service and implement necessary upgrades as necessary to school food service facilities.



GUIDING PRINCIPLE #2Recognize that the physical environment of a school directly affects student achievement and educa-tional growth.

The school’s physical environment affects learning and student achievement in both academics and co-curricular activities. Every student should have access to quality facilities that pro-vide engaging, motivating and stimulating places to learn. ECS schools need to provide effective classrooms for traditional lecture-based teaching, but also need to accommodate more interactive educational methods by providing flexible utilization of space to facilitate small group collaboration, independent studies, research work, on-line curriculum, and other pursuits.

Strategies for addressing Guiding Principle #2 include:• Provide the space, facilities, equipment, etc. necessary to motivate and engage students to learn.• Design new schools and renovate (to the extent feasible) existing schools to support contemporary education and alternative learning methods.• Pursue the renovation and when necessary the replacement of schools when the age and/or physical condition of the building no longer provides a quality learning environment or is otherwise inconsistent with District standards.• Provide facilities that foster student participation in co- curricular activities including but not limited to physical education, athletics, fine arts, career and technical education, debate, etc.

GUIDING PRINCIPLE #3Support environmental sustainability through the implementation of best practices in the design, construction and operation of schools and facilities.

ECS believes that environmental sustainability should be at the forefront of planning, designing, building and operating District facilities. There are a number of opportunities to incorporate environmental sustainability into future capital improvements and in the operation of existing facilities that may involve, but not be limited to green energy and efficiency, recycling and waste minimization, water conservation, and sustainable build-ing practices. Green initiatives can also be incorporated into and strengthen academic programs.

Strategies for addressing Guiding Principle #3 include:• Engage sustainability consultants in the planning, design and operation of District facilities.• The design and construction of new and renovated facilities should incorporate best practices with regard to the efficient use of natural resources, minimize energy and water use, reduce pollution and waste, and foster responsible land development.• Consider the return on investment (ROI), specifically the initial/up-front costs and life-cycle costs, when considering decisions about sustainable improvements and construction.• Pursue alternatives for incorporating environmental stewardship and sustainability into education and academic programs.



GUIDING PRINCIPLE #4Protect the taxpayer’s financial investments through the optimal utilization and preservation of buildings and facilities.

GUIDING PRINCIPLE #5Provide schools with student capacities sufficient to accommodate anticipated growth in school enroll-ments.

An underlying goal of this facility master plan is to ensure that Eagle County taxpayer’s investment in District’s facilities is pro-tected. This is to be accomplished through a long and near-term program of maintenance and renovation that extends the useful life of facilities to the greatest extent feasible.

Strategies for addressing Guiding Principle #4 include:• Continually monitor the condition of buildings to identify the need for necessary repairs, renovations and upgrades.• When the cost of repair or renovation of existing buildings exceeds 40% of the cost of a new building, consider the replacement of the facility.• Establish a permanent funding source for the implementation of an on-going maintenance program for all buildings.• Evaluate the long-term operational costs associated with repairing or renovating facilities in comparison to the cost of replacement and make decisions based on the return on investment (ROI).• Consider qualitative factors when evaluating the renovation or replacement of schools and other district facilities.

The number of students in each classroom directly affect the students learning experience and the ability of staff to educate. In addition, there is an optimal number of students that a build-ing can effectively support. Maintaining school enrollments that are in line with a building’s physical capacity is a priority of the Board of Education and an fundamental goal of this FMP.

Strategies for addressing Guiding Principle #4 include:• To the extent feasible, school enrollment levels should be maintained within the “Functional Capacity” as defined in the 2012 ECSD Building Capacity Study.• As school enrollments increase, implement school expansions or the construction of new schools as necessary to maintain acceptable school enrollment levels.• Utilize modular school buildings, boundary changes or other methods only when necessary to “bridge” capacity issues prior to the construction of school expansions or new schools.


GUIDING PRINCIPLE #6Equity is a core value. ECS should strive to provide all students and staff with equitable facilities, equip-ment, technology and other resources that will fur-ther the District’s mission.


GUIDING PRINCIPLE #7Foster public communication and engagement that provides for the accurate dissemination of informa-tion, generates community involvement, and pro-motes effective decision-making.

The District believes in equity, that all teachers and students should be provided with equivalent access to quality school facilities and quality academic programing and technology. Equities in schools include classrooms, core spaces (such as cafeterias, libraries, gyms and support spaces), and educational spaces such as art and music rooms, science labs and special education classrooms.

Strategies for addressing Guiding Principle #6 include:• Evaluate all schools to identify where inequities may exist in either facilities or programs and how capital improvement programs can be initiated to establish equity among all schools.• As new schools are developed with the latest design features, equipment, technology, etc,, the District should initiate efforts to incorporate comparable improvements to other existing schools.

ECS mission is to serve the community by educating the youth of Eagle County. As such, input from the community in the de-velopment of the FMP and during the more detailed planning, design and implementation of future capital improvements is essential. The District is committed to providing opportunities for input and engagement with the community to ensure that decisions regarding schools and facilities are consistent with the desires of the community.

Strategies for addressing Guiding Principle #7 include:• When appropriate, form committees to address specific topics and/or specific facilities.• Implement community outreach by hosting both community-wide and school specific meetings.• Provide translation at community meetings.• Utilize the internet to disseminate information, inform the community of District initiatives, and gather community input via surveyors or other methods.• Coordination with local governmental organizations (towns, Eagle County, metropolitan or special districts) and the business community to engage them in the District’s planning for future capital improvements.


5. invEntory oF SChoolS anD DiStriCt FaCiliitiES

One of the primary reasons for ECS preparing this facility master plan was the age of many District schools and recognition of the need to address maintenance and other building deficien-cies to ensure the longevity and health of these buildings. An initial step in this process was to complete a comprehensive inventory of all schools and District facilities. This inventory identi-fied all necessary improvements and also prioritized the need for these improvements. Below is a summary of how these facility inventories were completed, how the need for improvements were determined and prioritized, and the range of improve-ments needed at each school and facility.

SChool anD FaCility invEntoriESThe methodology outlined below was used to inventory the condition of all existing schools and facilities.

2012 Comprehensive Facilities Report In 2012 the ECS Maintenance Department compiled a compre-hensive list of facility needs (Needs Lists) for all District schools and facilities. Needs Lists generally included deferred mainte-nance items, future maintenance items and life-cycle replace-ment items. Needs Lists also include “wants” specific to some schools. Needs Lists were updated by the Maintenance Depart-ment in 2013 and 2014.

The Maintenance Department’s report became the starting point for identifying school and facility improvements. Needs Lists were reviewed with Maintenance staff to identify any im-provements that might have been addressed or to add new items since the Needs Lists were last updated.

Staff InterviewsInterviews were conducted with the principals, department heads and building representatives responsible for each District building in order to review and confirm building needs. Inter-views addressed a variety of topics relative to the building and how it is used. Tours of buildings and sites were also conducted as a part of this process. The Needs Lists were updated as nec-essary based on input received during these interviews. Results of staff interviews and site visits are included in Building Fact Sheets that have been completed for each building. Building Fact Sheets are found in the Appendix of this Plan.

Following staff interviews an initial prioritization of the refined Needs Lists was completed. The purpose of prioritizing build-ing needs was to better understand the time frame for when improvements should be addressed. Four priorities were es-tablished with Priority 1 being those improvements with the most immediate need to be addressed and Priority 4 being the least immediate. Priorities were initially determined based on interviews, staff input, overall building condition, costs and the project teams experience with building systems.

Committee ReviewThe Guiding Principles described in Chapter 4 were used by the GAC and the three sub-committees as a basis for their review of the Needs Lists. Each improvement was evaluated relative to how it furthered one or more of the Guiding Principles. Com-mittee review involved the evaluation of each improvement as well as the prioritization of these improvements. Following review by the sub-committees, the GAC formally endorsed the Needs Lists for each school and District facility.



nEEDS liSt anD PrioritiES The GAC and sub-committee’s involvement was essential in re-fining the Needs Lists and prioritizing these improvements. Each improvement was categorized with respect to one or more of the seven Guiding Principles of this Plan. This step was essential to ensuring that each improvement was furthering one or more of the FMP’s Guiding Principles.

Below is a description of improvements for Priorities 1-4:

Priority 1Timeframe - Immediate

Priority 1 improvements are facility needs that should be addressed in the immediate future. Priority 1 improvements generally address building preservation, safety, security, and capacity issues. Delays in addressing Priority 1 items could result in potential long-term damage to buildings. Priority 1 improvements include immediate building preservation needs, (mechanical, electrical, asphalt, roof-ing), renovations of existing spaces, furnishing replacements, playground upgrades, fire alarm upgrades, asbestos removal, accessibil-ity issues, capacity issues, lockers.


5. invEntory oF SChoolS anD DiStriCt FaCiliitiESPriority 2Timeframe – 2-4 years

Priority 3Timeframe - 4+ years

Priority 2 improvements require attention in the next 2-4 years. Priority 2 items include building preservation- (window replacement, me-chanical optimization and upgrades, lighting retrofits, heat tape, irrigation, flooring, ceilings), auditorium upgrades, kitchen equipment, paint, drinking fountains, furnishing replacement, building sealants, door hardware replacement.

Priority 3 improvements address building preservation needs and also includes improvements that may be considered more “wants” than “needs”. Building Preservation (cabinetry replacement, mechanical and electrical upgrades, custodial equipment, flooring), cafeteria tables, exterior facade renovations, site circulation, landscaping, kitchen/serving line redesign, widow covering replacement, appliance replacement, ceiling tile replacement, furnishings replacement, are examples of Priority 3 items.



Priority 4Priority 4 improvements include facility needs which are considered more “wants” than “needs”. Signage, renewable energy, synthetic turf replacement, tracks at middle schools, additional fire sprinklers (beyond code requirements), and additional insulation are exam-ples of Priority 4 improvements.

In general all the District’s buildings are in need of improvements to address maintenance needs that have accumulated over the past 4-5 years. This deferred maintenance has occurred due to a lack of available funding. Deferred maintenance items are typically included in Priorities 1 and 2. While schools with deferred maintenance needs are functioning, if these maintenance items are not ad-dressed in a timely manner the cost of repairs and potential replacement could continue to rise or more permanent damage to build-ings could occur.

A Building Fact Sheet has been prepared for each school and District facility. Building Fact Sheets include background information on the school or building (such as size, date of construction, date of expansion, capacities, and enrollment), results of staff interviews, infor-mation on energy consumption and other information on the buildings. Facility Needs Lists include all improvements contemplated for each building. Facility Needs Lists are an element of the Building Fact Sheets, which are found in the Appendix of this Plan.

In addition to inventorying the condition of school buildings, inventories of all other District’s other buildings were completed. These inventories included the 3rd Street Annex and West Bus Barn, Chambers Road Administration buildings, and the East Bus Barn and food service warehouse.


DiStriCt-wiDE initiativESSecurity, technology and energy efficiency are critically impor-tant considerations for each of the District’s buildings. Because of their importance to all buildings, these considerations were evaluated on a District-wide basis relative to defining the range and type of improvements that may be necessary. Below is a summary of improvements necessary to address these three initiatives.

SecurityProviding safe and secure buildings is a major focus of this Plan. The following factors were considered in the evaluation of each school in order to identify specific school improvements neces-sary to enhance security:• Secured Vestibules – Provide school entries that allow staff to control school access and implement an “all doors locked” policy. Renovations necessary to provide secure entries are required at most schools and range from relatively minor to major modifications.• Enforce “all doors locked” policy – there is a need to follow up at all schools to ensure enforcement of this policy.• Door Access system – install detection systems that provide notification of doors that may be open or unlocked.• Keyless entry systems - provide keyless systems to specific doors.• Security Cameras - Install cameras (or additional cameras) where necessary: Elementary Schools – Entries and drop-off areas Middle Schools – Entries, drop-off areas, and other areas High School – All interior and exterior public areas • Improvements to school grounds, landscaping, exterior lighting, etc.

TechnologyTechnology is an evolving science that is continually changing and technology changes often occur at a very rapid rate. The nature of technology is such that it creates the need for an on-going rotational program for equipment and software replace-ment. While the District has a rotational program in place, the costs of upgrading technology are significant and funding has not allowed ECS to keep pace with all necessary technology upgrades. At a District-wide level, the following was identified as the “benchmark” for technology improvements to all schools and District facilities:• Enhance wireless access points to increase the ability to wirelessly connect computers. • Provide for additional and upgraded data access points in older buildings.• Install LCD projectors in every classroom to facilitate project lessons, student work, and presentations.• Accelerate rotation program for computers, phones, and hardware in all buildings to replace outdated and unsupported equipment and software.• Upgrade public announcement systems.• Upgrade connectivity of wireless and data outlets in Media Centers.• Pursue alternatives for standardization of District software and technology services.• Pursue cost effective options for installation of a district- wide fiber optic connection between all buildings.

Energy EfficiencySince 2006 the District has implemented numerous programs to reduce the energy consumption. These programs have resulted in a 37% reduction in energy usage across all District buildings. With the help of Ameresco, an energy consultant, a number of improvements have been identified to enhance the energy efficiency of buildings and to further reduce the District’s energy costs.



Many of the energy efficiency improvements specific to each school address how to optimize the use of existing equipment and the need to replace older equipment. Examples of these improvements are replacing existing lights with LED lights and the installation of improved automated controls. Water usage will also be addressed by installing improved irrigation controls and high-efficient water fixtures. These and other energy ef-ficiency improvements are indicated on the Needs List found in the Appendix of this Plan.

A suggested budget for renewable energy programs has been provided for each of the District’s buildings. The suggested re-newable energy budget is intended fund improvements such as solar panels or geo-thermal facilities. This budget amount was a product of an energy evaluation report prepared by Ameresco. A copy of the Ameresco report if found in the appendix.

SuMMary oF SChool ConDitionSBuilding MaintenanceDuring the process of evaluating buildings and preparing the Needs Lists it became very apparent that the need for main-tenance and other improvements was directly related to the age of a building . All elements of a building have a life cycle that sooner or later requires replacement and as a building gets older the extent and cost of building maintenance increases. By way of example, typically the life of a low slope roof is 30 years, interior painting is necessary every 10 years, and carpet-ing needs replacement every 20 years. These and many other maintenance items deal just with the basic structure and infra-structure if a building. Many other critical elements of a school building age over time and periodically need replacement. Technology, communication and electrical systems, furnishings and fixtures, space needs and many other considerations re-quire upgrade and renovation.

Improvements included on the Needs Lists address the consid-erations listed above and are intended to bring all buildings, particularly the District’s older buildings, up to current standards and to extend the life of all District’s schools and facilities.

Many of the improvements on the Needs Lists are periodic build-ing maintenance items that are relatively routine and predict-able. Due to a lack of funding for capital improvements and building maintenance, and with reductions in District staff, many maintenance items have not been able to be addressed. In the recent past, building maintenance has been limited by budgetary constraints and the District has generally been able to address emergency maintenance situations only. This has put the District into a reactive position as opposed to a proac-tive one with regard to building maintenance.

Due to school finance limitations, school districts have few options but to fund building maintenance via periodic school bonds. This is not an ideal situation for many reasons. One of the main reasons is that as buildings age and maintenance items are not addressed, the cost to address maintenance gen-erally increases. Deferred maintenance can also result in sig-nificant building deterioration potentially resulting even greater long-term costs.

It will be very important for the District to evaluate potential alternatives for establishing permanent funding for on-going building maintenance. An estimated maintenance budget for the District’s schools and buildings would be in the range of $7 million per year. This is based on industry standards of 1-4% of a buildings replacement costs and varies based on the age and condition of each building. While this is a significant amount of money, it is understandable considering the District has 21 build-ings that comprise over 1,200,000 square feet.



1©2014 U.S. Education Delivery Institute

Good (0‐15% ofReplacement Cost)

Brush Creek Elementary

Battle Mountain High

Homestake Peak PK‐8

June Creek Elementary

Red Hill Elementary

Eagle County Charter Academy

Fair (15‐30% of Replacement Cost)

Poor (Over 30% ofReplacement Cost)

Eagle Valley Elementary

Eagle Valley Middle

Red Sandstone Elementary

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Red Canyon High – East

Avon Elementary

Berry Creek Middle

Edwards Elementary

Eagle Valley High

Gypsum Elementary

Gypsum Creek Middle

Each school was evaluated based on cost of facility needs compared to the cost of replacing building

Life Cycle of BuildingsThe cost of addressing the Needs List for each school and building was compared to the estimated cost of building replacement. As could be expected, the percentage of maintenance cost to building replacement cost was greater for older buildings. For example, the percentage for Eagle Valley Middle School is 43.7% and Red Sandstone Elementary is 46.1%, while Battle Mountain High School is just 6.2%. While there is no hard and fast standard for when the maintenance cost percentage indicates that a building should be re-placed, general guidelines indicate that when the percentage approaches or exceeds 40%, building replacement may be warranted.

Buildings have been ranked as Good, Fair and Poor based on the comparison of maintenance costs and replacement costs. A sum-mary of these rankings is provided below:




In addition to the quantitative approach of evaluating the per-centage of maintenance cost to replacement cost, many other qualitative factors were considered when preparing recom-mendations for the replacement of a building. These included:• Educational space – The size of classrooms and whether they were consistent with today’s standards. • Support and Other Spaces – The adequacy of building support spaces and other key school functions. Examples of these include width of hallways, the number and size of restrooms, and the size of cafeterias storage, offices, and mechanical/technology areas.• Mechanical Systems – The quality and comfort of air handling systems and the compliance of these systems with current codes.• Building Finishes – The condition of flooring, walls, ceilings, etc.• Natural Light – Older buildings tend to have less natural light. Current practice is to provide ample natural light to reduce energy consumption and to foster a better learning environment.• Educational Programing – Whether or not the building is capable of accommodating current educational programs and teaching methods.


6. DEMograPhiCS anD EnrollMEnt ForECaStS

The underlying goal of this Plan is to ensure that ECS has the facilities necessary to provide a quality educational experience for the children of Eagle County. Understanding where, when and to what extent increased school capacity may be needed is a major focus of this Plan. In order to understand future ca-pacity needs the District retained Western Demographics, Inc. to provide enrollment projections. Western Demographics Inc. completed a report titled Eagle County School District Demo-graphics and School Facilities Data, December 2015. This report provides the basis for recommendations on how the District can address future capacity needs. Below is a summary of this re-port, a complete copy of the report is found in the Appendix.

PurPoSE anD nEED For DEMograPhiC rEPortThe purpose of the demographic report was to forecast future school enrollments throughout the District and to identify the potential need for new school facilities necessary to accommo-date enrollment growth. The District’s last enrollment study was done in 2010 and since the recession of 2007-2009, many factors that influence school enrollment have been in a state of flux.Foremost among these factors is new residential development. The rate of new residential development in Eagle County has changed dramatically from pre-recession development levels and has only recently begun to stabilize. In order to forecast student enrollment, it was necessary to have a current under-standing of new residential growth and all the other consider-ations that influence enrollment growth.

aPProaCh anD MEthoDologyThe process of forecasting school enrollments and planning for new school facilities has been described as a combination of

art and science. In general, school population forecasting is derived from basic demographic forecasting techniques, and is somewhat based on taking recent growth or decline dynam-ics and applying those rates to the future. The factors that are considered when forecasting school enrollments include the following:

• Historic School Enrollment Growth• Birth Rates• Overall Population Growth Expectations and In-Migration• School-aged Composition of Expected Growth• Grade-level Differences within the K-12 Population• Job Growth and Economic Outlook• Housing Availability and Affordability• Future Residential Development Plans

Two levels of forecasting were completed - annual enrollment projections for the years 2016–2023 were done for each school and a preliminary estimate of school enrollment was prepared for the year 2030. Projecting enrollment to an eight-year hori-zon is generally the greatest length of time most demographers are comfortable forecasting. This is due in large part to the vari-ety of factors and multitude of assumptions that must be made in preparing enrollment forecasts. For 2016-2023, enrollment projections have been developed by school and by grade. Low, medium and high enrollment scenarios were prepared, each reflecting a different rate of residential growth.

In order to understand what potential long-term enrollment growth could mean to the District, projections out to 2030 were prepared. While the 2030 projections provide an indication of what ECS could experience in the future, forecasting 15 years into the future is quite speculative. As such, the 2030 forecasts should be considered an indication of what could happen long-term, they should not be used for making decisions on spe-cific facility improvements at this time.


Student enrollment projections were assigned to each school based on existing school boundaries. Enrollment numbers were then compared to school capacities based on the 2012 ECSD Building Capacity Study, prepared by TAB Associates, Inc. A copy of this report is found in the Appendix. School capacities define both a “functional” and “stressed” capacity. Functional Capacity reflects an enrollment that can be reasonably and ef-fectively accommodated by a school and provides for “growth spikes” in student population without the need for expanded facilities. Stressed Capacity reflects a school at its maximum capacity. While a school that reaches its stressed capacity can function within building codes and other standards, a school at its stressed capacity would indicate the need for the District to manage capacity by re-allocating space within the school, adding modulars or building expansions, modifying school boundaries or constructing a new school.

inFluEnCE oF nEw rESiDEntial DEvEloPMEntThe rate of new residential development in Eagle County has varied widely over the past ten years. Prior to the recession Eagle County saw as many as 600 new residential units annual. In the years following the recession new housing starts dipped to less than 100 annually. In 2014 and 2015 new housing starts have averaged +/-150 per year. Due to these variations and the uncertainty with defining what the rate of residential devel-opment will be in the future, three residential growth scenarios were prepared. The Low Growth Scenario assumes that the cur-rent rate of +/-150 new units per year continued through 2023. The High Growth Scenario assumes annual increases to housing starts that “max out” at approximately 325 per year in 2023. The Medium Growth Scenario is essentially a middle-ground scenar-io between the High and Low scenarios. These scenarios pro-vide some perspective on the implications of residential growth on future school enrollment. For the purposes of this analysis, the Medium Growth Scenario was used in forecasting future school enrollments.

Type of HousingWhile a significant amount of new housing has been developed in Eagle County over the past 10-20 years, as a resort-oriented community the number of school-aged children generated by new housing is directly influenced by the type of housing that is developed. For example, resort-oriented (second home) housing and large estate residential homes tend to generate very few school-aged children. In general, single-family homes regardless of their location produce more school children than apartments, town homes or condominiums. Mobile and modular housing, because of their relative affordability, tend to produce a very high rate of school-aged children. On aver-age homes in the western end of the County generate more students than homes in the eastern end.

In order to quantify for the variations in student generation from different housing types, average “student yields” (students per housing unit) were determined by evaluating the number of existing students generated by different housing types. Student yields varied from as little as .02 students per unit in Cordillera to as high as 1.01 students per unit in Two Rivers Village in Dotsero.

151 151 152 150 150 152 152 152 152 156 170 196 211 227 230 234

152 193

256 295

319 326 326 328

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

ECSD - Future Housing Growth Scenarios - 2016 - 2023

Low Medium High



Assumptions on the rate of residential growth and student yield per unit were applied to twenty-four existing or planned residen-tial projects in order to understand how future residential growth will impact student enrollment. These twenty-four projects are not the only source of new residential development that will occur in the County, many “in-fill units” will be developed in other projects. These twenty-four projects generally represent the larger projects in the County (that could have the greatest impact on future student growth) and they also provide a good representation of where future development may occur. The estimated student generation from these residential develop-ments was then assigned to respective schools based on exist-ing school boundaries.

hiStoriC EnrollMEnt trEnDS anD ExiSting EnrollMEntSEnrollment has steadily increased during the past five years at a rate of approximately two percent. Notwithstanding the ef-fects of the economic downturn, the average annual growth rate during the past ten years was 2.45 percent. This enrollment increase is not insignificant. In general, elementary enrollment has been stable since 2008 while middle and high school enroll-ments have grown. The following chart suggests that overall enrollment will continue to grow with secondary school enroll-ments driving growth in the short-term.

2610 2665 2767 3024 3088 3032 3069 3084 3065 3064 3023

1183 1135 1190 1193 1248 1265 1380 1396 1453 1519 1558 1423 1487 1556 1604 1695 1659 1694 1737 1760 1881 1980

5365 5426 5679

6007 6244 6181

6344 6408 6520 6713 6826

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Eagle County School District - Enrollment History - 2005 - 2015

(K-‐5) (6-‐8) (9-‐12) Total with Preschool

The construction of new schools made possible by the com-munity’s support of recent bond elections has enabled ECS to avoid significant school capacity issues. The diagram on the following page indicates 2015 enrollments and the Capaci-ties of all schools. The vast majority of ECS schools are currently meeting enrollment needs at a very satisfactory level (within Functional Capacities).






FinDingSThe main findings of the demographic study are:

• ECS has experienced consistent 2% enrollment growth over past 5 years • Birth rates are down slightly, unemployment is down significantly, labor force has been stable• Planned housing projects will produce significant numbers of new students, primarily in the western half of the district.• Larger than average-sized grades 3-8 are advancing into middle and high schools, resulting in “built-in” growth in several secondary schools.• Smaller than average-sized K-2 grades are replacing larger 3-5 grades, resulting in declines in some schools.• Over the next eight years the western end of the County is expected to experience significant enrollment growth while enrollment will remain relatively flat in the eastern end of the County.

• By 2023 significant capacity shortfalls are expected at Eagle Valley Elementary, Eagle Valley Middle and Eagle Valley High School during the eight-year period of the forecast.• Minor capacity shortfalls are expected at Red Hill Elementary and Homestake Peak.• Aside from schools mentioned above, growth in the district over next 8 years should be accommodated by existing schools.

The table below compares projected 2023 enrollments to the Functional and Stressed capacities of Eagle County schools. It is important to note that the enrollment and capacity numbers were derived based on existing school boundaries. While spec-ulative in nature, 2030 enrollment projections are also provided on this table. The graph on the following page indicates historic enrollments since 2005 and forecasted enrollments to 2023 for elementary, middle and high schools.

Neighborhood School

En

roll 2

02

3

Fun

ctio

nal

Cap

aci

ty

Str

ess

ed

C

ap

aci

ty

20

23

Seats

A

vailab

le

Fun

ctio

nal

20

23

Seats

A

vailab

le

Str

ess

ed

Ad

dit

ion

al

Stu

den

ts b

y 2

03

0

En

roll 2

03

0

20

30

Seats

A

vailab

le

Fun

ctio

nal

20

30

Seats

A

vailab

le

Str

ess

ed

Avon_ES 235 443 466 208 231 0 235 208 231Brush_Creek_ES 396 489 514 93 118 83 479 10 35Eagle_Valley_ES 537 409 430 (128) (107) 151 688 (279) (258)Edwards_ES 213 459 483 246 270 9 222 237 261Gypsum_ES 283 444 468 161 185 100 383 61 85Homestake_PK_ES 230 433 510 203 280 111 341 92 169June_Creek_ES 247 387 408 140 161 16 263 124 145Red_Hill_ES 474 425 448 (49) (26) 266 740 (315) (292)Red_Sandstone_ES 172 247 260 75 88 7 179 68 81Berry_Creek_MS 317 466 548 149 231 20 337 129 211Eagle_Valley_MS 470 379 446 (91) (24) 144 614 (235) (168)Gypsum_Creek_MS 412 464 546 52 134 163 575 (111) (29)Homestake_Peak_MS 224 220 258 (4) 34 80 304 (84) (46)Battle_Mountain_HS 927 1169 1375 242 448 106 1033 136 342Eagle_Valley_HS 1286 968 1139 (318) (147) 342 1628 (660) (489)

ECSD School Enrollment and Seat Availability Given Projections - 2023, 2030



5365 5426

5679

6007

6244 6181

6344 6408

6520

6713

6826

6993

7106 7126 7186 7188 7183 7180 7221

5365 5426

5679

6007

6244 6181

6344 6408

6520

6713

6826

6996

7109 7133 7210

7259 7283 7320

7412

5365 5426

5679

6007

6244 6181

6344 6408

6520

6713

6826

6954

7086

7205

7315 7398

7464 7535

7663

5000

5500

6000

6500

7000

7500

8000

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

Eagle County School District - Enrollment History and Multi-basis Enrollment Forecast - 2005 - 2023

Low Forecast Medium Forecast High Forecast

Chapter 8 of this Plan provides recommendations for how future capacity needs can be addressed. Recommendations provide both short-term and for long-term solutions.

Given the dynamic nature of the factors that influence forecasting school enrollment in Eagle County, it will be necessary to periodically update the demographic and enrollment report.


7. lanD rESourCES

ECS owns, will acquire via land dedication, or has perpetual easements on 33 properties throughout Eagle County that collectively comprise approximately 400 acres. The diagram on the following page depicts the location of all District parcels. Properties in black type are existing schools, red type indicates other school facilities and blue type indicates vacant parcels.


7. lanD rESourCES

The majority of the District’s properties are developed with schools and school-related facilities and the tables below summarize the District land holdings and facilities. Properties and facilities are presented in three categories: school sites, sites used for other District purposes and vacant or undeveloped land.

School SitesECS’s 18 schools are included on the table below. The location, parcel size and approximate school square footage is provided. In most cases the school is located on one parcel that is owned by ECS. However, this is not the always the case. In some cases more than one school is located on one parcel, one school may be located on more than one parcel, the District may not own the land on which the school is located and/or school related facilities (parking or fields) may be located on land the District does not own. These unique situations are described.

ECS Land and Facility InventorySchools ECS Facility Master Plan

Parcel Building Year School Location Size Size (sf) Built Comments

Avon Elementary Avon 6.0 ac 67,780 1996Portions of field and parking located on Town of Avon land

Battle Mountain High Edwards 38.7 ac 209,000 2009Berry Creek Middle Edwards 16.7 ac 80,552 1996 Parcel includes RCHS east campusBrush Creek Elementary Eagle 10.3 ac 65,143 2001Eagle County Charter Edwards 6.0 ac 45,000 2012

Eagle Valley Elementary Eagle 23.3 ac 47,738 1973 Parcel includes EVMS and District Annex BuildingEagle Valley High Gypsum 26.3 ac 155,147 1975/2009 Parcel includes GESEagle Valley Middle Eagle 23.3 ac 53,700 1980 Parcel includes EVES and District officesEdwards Elementary Edwards 9.1 ac 55,000 1991Gypsum Creek Middle Gypsum 13.4 ac 81,500 2001Gypsum Elementary Gypsum 26.3 ac 55,000 1991 Located on EVHS parcel

Homestake Peak Eagle-Vail 15.6 ac 122,500 1975/1991ECS ownes 15.6 ac in fee, has perpetual lease on 44 acres from State Land Board

June Creek Elementary Edwards 9.8 ac 70,000 2008Red Canyon High East Edwards 16.7 ac 5,052 2008 Located on BCMS parcelRed Canyon High West Eagle n/a 6,000 leased RCHS west campus operates in leased spaceRed Hill Elementary Gypsum 12.9 ac 62,900 2001

Red Sandstone Elementary Vail 4.3 ac 45,500 1977

ECS has perpetual lease on 4.3 ac from Town of Vail. Access and fields located on other Town owned parcels.

Vail Ski/Snowboard Academy Minturn 45 ac 55,632 1978 VSSA comprises approximately 8 ac


7. lanD rESourCESDistrict Facilities/Other FacilitiesSchool related facilities and other uses are listed on the table below. Note that in many cases these facilities are located on school sites.

ECS Land and Facility InventorySchool-related and other facilitiesECS Facility Master Plan

District Facilities/Other Location Uses CommentsDistrict Offices/Chambers Eagle District offices, administration ECS owns building, leases space in District Offices/3rd Street Eagle Transportation, Food ServiceMaintenance/3rd Street Eagle Maintenance Located below EVES Eagle-Vail Facility Eagle-Vail Transportation, Food Service Facility also includes staff housing unitGypsum Residences Gypsum Staff housing units (5)Minturn/Pooh Corner Minturn Pre-school ECS leases building to operator

Vacant ParcelsThe District owns or will be acquiring via school land dedication thirteen undeveloped parcels. These include both vacant parcels and undeveloped areas within existing developed school sites. The table below lists the location and size of these parcels. Where relevant, the anticipated use of these parcels is provided. The intended use of these lands is further described in Chapter 8 – FMP Recommen-dations.

ECS Land and Facility InventoryVacant ParcelsECS Facility Master Plan

Vacant Parcels Location Size Intended Use CommentsBindley Parcel Gypsum 6 ac EVHS fields Parcel located adjacent to EVHSValley Airpark Site Gypsum 2 ac TBD Parcel located in Airpark SubdivisionEdwards/Miller Ranch Parcel Edwards 3.6 ac Use by others SOS has option to acquire parcel

Eagle-Vail/Homestake Parcel Eagle-Vail 3 ac TBDApproximately 3 acres of undeveloped land within District's 16 ac parcel

Maloit Park Minturn 87 ac TBDVSSA occupies 6-8 acres of 45 ac "buildable" parcel

Red Mountain Ranch Parcel Eagle 40 ac TBD Purchased by District, located east of EagleIK Bar Residential Parcels Gypsum 12 ac Residential Two parcels, 10 and 2 acresIK Bar School Site Gypsum 18 ac Future school Approximately 14 acres buildableBuckhorn Valley Parcel Gypsum 10 ac Future school School land dedication provided by developerGilman Parcel Gilman .01 ac None Ownership of parcel subject to confirmation

Hay Meadow Parcel (Pending) Eagle 10-15 ac Future school

Land dedication to be provided by developer. Size of parcel to be dedicated to be determined based on ECS needs

Avon Village Parcel (Pending) Avon 3.8 ac TBD Land dedication to be provided by developer


8. rECoMMEnDationS

Recommendations for improvements to District schools and facilities are presented in three related, yet distinct areas:

Near-term ImprovementsThese improvements are needed in the near future or in some cases in a fairly immediate time frame. Near-term improve-ments include maintenance, renovations and upgrades to exist-ing buildings and the construction of new buildings or expan-sions necessary to increase school capacities.

Long-term ImprovementsThese improvements are less time-sensitive than near-term im-provements and include both improvements to existing facilities and the construction of new buildings that may be necessary to provide increased school capacity.

Land ResourcesThese recommendations provide direction on how vacant lands will be used to address future school and facility needs and also identifies District parcels that may be considered surplus lands or could be used for non-school purposes.

Recommendations were formulated based on a number of considerations. Foremost among these is that all recommenda-tions implement one or more of the Guiding Principles outlined in Chapter 4 of this Plan. Other considerations used in preparing these recommendations, particularly with respect to the con-struction of new schools, were the age of buildings, compari-sons of building renovation costs to building replacement costs, and how qualitative aspects of a building could be addressed.

Recommendations provide a general direction for improve-ments to the District’s buildings and facilities. They define the District’s vision for preferred improvements that will best serve the needs of students, staff and the community. In some cases

more than one alternative is provided for addressing a particu-lar situation and in such cases a preferred alternative is sug-gested.

Final decisions on building and facility improvements will be made after a more detailed analysis of each improvement is completed. This analysis will include, but not be limited to more detailed project design and estimates of project costs. Funding alternatives and the District’s bonding capability will also be a major consideration in finalizing future building and school im-provement plans. During these subsequent studies and analysis the District will engage the community to obtain their input and perspective on future improvements. While the recommenda-tions below are a starting point for potential improvements to schools and facilities, the considerations above will ultimately determine final decisions on the nature, extent and timing of future improvements.

A number of the recommendations in this Plan involve new or expanded schools necessary to increase school capacity. It is important to note that not all capacity issues will need to be addressed by building new capacity. Enrollment projections have assigned future growth to schools based on existing school boundaries. This has resulted in some cases where a school has a significant seat deficit while a neighboring school has a signifi-cant seat surplus. In these cases school boundary modifications may be used to address school capacities. In addition to the potential for school boundary changes, the potential benefits of changing school grade configurations may also be evaluated in the future.

A summary table of recommendations for near-term improve-ments, long-term improvements and land resources is provided on the following page. More detailed explanations of these recommendation is provided on the following pages.


SUMMARY OF FACILITY MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONSNear-Term Improvements (now - 4 years)Maintenance/Upgrades to Existing Schools and Facilities Capacity Expansions/New FacilitiesPriority #1 and #2 Improvements to: Replace Red Sandstone ElementaryAvon Elementary Homestake Peak Replace Eagle Valley Elementary SchoolBattle Mountain High June Creek Elementary Replace Eagle Valley Middle SchoolBerry Creek Middle VSSA Expand Eagle Valley High SchoolBrush Creek Elementary East Bus Barn New Red Canyon High School - WestEdwards Elementary Chambers Road Admin BuildingExpand Red Canyon High School - EastGypsum Elementary Expand Red Hill Elementary

New District Operations HubDistrict Board room/Food ServiceStaff housing

Long-Term Improvements (4-10 years or longer)Maintenance/Upgrades to Existing Schools and Facilities Capacity Expansions/New FacilitiesPriority #3 and #4 Improvements to: New Haymeadow School (Eagle)Avon Elementary Homestake Peak Expand Homestake PeakBattle Mountain High June Creek Elementary Convert Gypsum Elementary to High School useBerry Creek Middle VSSA New Elementary at IK BarBrush Creek Elementary East Bus Barn New Buckhorn Elementary (Gypsum) Edwards Elementary Chambers Ad Min BuildingGypsum Elementary

LAND RESOURCESFuture School Development District or Other UsesBuckhorn Valley Parcel Pooh Corner (Minturn)IK Bar Parcel IK Bar Residential ParcelsHaymeadow Parcel (pending dedication)Eagle Vail/Homestake ParcelBindley Parcel Use to be DeterminedRed Mountain Ranch ParcelAvon Village Parcel (pending dedication)Valley AirPark ParcelMaloit Park

8. rECoMMEnDationS


nEar-tErM iMProvEMEntS Near-term improvements address maintenance issues and enhancements to existing schools and buildings, the redevelop-ment or expansion of existing buildings and district-wide initia-tives (security, technology and energy conservation). Near-term suggests that the improvements be pursued when funding can be secured or within the next two to four years.

Improvements to Existing Buildings and FacilitiesThe following is recommended for existing schools and District facilities:• Priority 1 improvements identified on the Needs List should be implemented as soon as funding is available. • Priority 2 improvements identified on the Needs List should be implemented within the next 2 years.

The recommended Priority 1 and 2 improvements would occur at the following schools and facilities:Avon ElementaryBattle Mountain HighBerry Creek MiddleBrush Creek ElementaryEdwards ElementaryGypsum ElementaryHomestake PeakJune Creek ElementaryVSSAEast Bus BarnChambers Road Administration Building

Specific Priority 1 and 2 improvements for each school and building are indicated on the Facility Needs Lists that are includ-ed in the Building Fact Sheets found in the Appendix of this Plan.

New and Expanded Schools and Facilities The following new schools, capacity expansions to existing schools and renovations to District facilities are recommended:

Red Sandstone Elementary SchoolDue to the age of this building, inadequate or antiquated de-sign features (i.e. under-sized classrooms, lack of natural light, in-adequate storage, office, cafeteria and kitchen spaces, out of date electrical and technology systems, extensive list of repairs and replacements of equipment), and the high percentage of renovation cost to replacement cost, it is recommended that RSES be demolished and replaced with a new building. The goal of a new building is to improve the overall quality of the school’s physical environment.

Based on enrollment projections there is no need to increase the existing capacity of RSES (current Functional Capacity is 247)

Eagle Valley Elementary School and Eagle Valley Middle SchoolDue to the age of these two buildings, inadequate or antiquat-ed design features (i.e. under-sized classrooms and hallways, lack of natural light, major mechanical issues (fresh air and sounds), out of date electrical and technology systems, exten-sive list of repairs and replacement), and the high percentage of renovation cost to replacement cost, it is recommended that both EVES and EVMS be demolished and replaced with new buildings. The goal of this effort is to improve the overall qual-ity of the school’s physical environment and to increase school capacity.

There are a number of alternatives for how these schools can be redeveloped. Either free-standing elementary and middle schools or a PK-8 school could be developed. This decision will be made after subsequent design studies and with input from the school community. A number of District operations (main-tenance, transportation, food service, technology) currently operate out of the 3rd Street campus. A goal of this redevelop-ment would be to re-locate most or all of these operations so use of the 3rd Street campus is focused on academics. Deci-

8. rECoMMEnDationS


sions on the re-location of these operations will be made after subsequent design studies of the 3rd Street campus and upon further evaluation of alternative locations for these operations.

There is a need to increase the capacities of both schools in order to accommodate anticipated enrollment growth in the Eagle area. While final decisions on school capacity will be made during subsequent stages in the planning and design pro-cess, it is anticipated that school capacities for both EVES and EVMS will be approximately 500 students. The functional capac-ity of EVES is currently 409 and EVMS is currently 379.

Refer to discussion of Red Canyon High School and District Op-erations below.

Eagle Valley High SchoolGrowth of high school enrollment in the western end of the County is expected to stress the capacity of EVHS in the next three to four years and by 2023 the capacity deficit could sur-pass 300 seats. Renovation and expansion of EVHS is needed to provide a capacity of approximately 1,300 students. This can be accomplished by adding classrooms and renovating or expanding auditorium, gym, locker room, hallway and other common spaces. In addition to adding needed capacity, the renovation and expansion of EVHS presents the opportunity to create classrooms and other spaces that could accommodate alternative high school programs. During the detailed design process of EVHS consideration will be given to creating new spaces that are flexible and capable of accommodating new programs that may include but not be limited to Career Techni-cal Education (CTE).

Red Canyon High School WestRCHS has operated out of leased space for many years and a new, permanent building for the school is necessary. Subject to further analysis the capacity of this new school is expected to be 120 students. Based on conceptual design studies it appears

feasible to accommodate a new RCHS and the redevelopment of EVES and EVMS on the 3rd Street campus. 3rd Street is the recommended location for this school. If subsequent design studies identify issues with locating RCHS at the 3rd Street cam-pus, alternative locations for RCHS could be on a portion of the undeveloped school site at the IK Bar in Gypsum, or a new par-cel to be acquired by the District. While a less than ideal alter-native, the 2-acre Valley Airpark site has sufficient land area to accommodate a new school.

Red Canyon High School EastThe east campus of RCHS was has a functional capacity of 81 students. Due to the growth In this program the school has been accommodating nearly 100 students for the past few years. The need to increase the capacity of the school is warranted. The recommendation is to add additional classrooms to increase the functional capacity of RCHS East to approximately 120 stu-dents.

Red Hill ElementaryEnrollment at Red Hill Elementary is currently approaching its Functional Capacity and is expected to exceed this capacity in the next few years. Currently Pre-K programs utilize standard classrooms. It is recommended that a two Pre-K rooms be added to the school.

District Operations/3rd Street Campus Transportation, technology (in the Annex Building) and mainte-nance (beneath the EVES gym) currently operate out of the 3rd Street campus. It is recommended that if feasible these uses be re-located to a centralized “operations hub”. Centralizing these uses will improve the efficiency of District operations and re-locating these uses will address the goal of converting 3rd Street to predominantly academic uses. Removing the traffic intensive maintenance and transportation functions will benefit the surrounding residential neighborhood.

8. rECoMMEnDationS


There are a number of alternatives for how District operations could be addressed. The preferred solution is for the District to secure a site and/or building that could accommodate trans-portation, maintenance and technology. It is possible that the EVES gym may be retained as a part of redeveloping that school. Maintenance is currently located below the gym. If the gym is retained it may be cost effective for maintenance to remain in its existing location. This decision will be made after more detailed design, cost estimating and evaluation of poten-tial site alternatives is completed.

Food service offices are currently located in the Annex Building on the 3rd Street campus. It is recommended that these offices be located within the redeveloped EVES or EVMS. In addition to these offices, it is recommended that the kitchen constructed to serve these schools be slightly over-sized to allow for commodity storage, the centralization of some food preparations (sauces, dressings, etc.), and kitchen staff training.

The ECS Board of Education board room is currently located within the Annex Building and this building will be removed to allow for the redevelopment of EVES and EVMS. It is recom-mended that a new board room be incorporated into the redevelopment of 3rd Street. This room should be designed to accommodate board meetings as well as accommodate other District-wide uses such as meetings, training and presentations.

Staff HousingThe challenges ECS employees encounter in securing attain-able housing are acute and the cost and availability of housing in Eagle County has become a significant hindrance to both recruiting and retaining employees. The District’s issues created by the housing situation are no different than those faced by ev-ery other employer in the Valley. There are increasingly limited housing options for the County’s workforce and housing that is available is priced such that it is not attainable to most employ-ees.

8. rECoMMEnDationS

The District’s difficulty in recruiting and retaining quality employ-ees directly impacts the District’s mission. The District is often unable to recruit quality teachers and annually the District loses quality teachers due to housing issues. The inability to retain teacher is disruptive to the schools and expensive for the Dis-trict.

In order to address this situation it is recommend that the District pursue initiatives to create housing for District staff. Specific ap-proaches for how the District could address this situation have not been defined. Alternatives could include:• The development of either rental or for-sale housing• The District functions as developer of housing project(s)• The District joint ventures with housing developers• The District’s surplus land is made available for housing development• Implementation of a down-payment assistance program for employees

These and other alternatives should be evaluated by the District to determine the most effective means for addressing the hous-ing situation.

long-tErM iMProvEMEntSBelow are improvements that may be needed to address long-term building and facility needs and to provide the District with increased school capacity that may be needed in the future. Long-term improvements will not be necessary for four to ten years, if not longer. Generally, improvements to existing build-ings will be necessary in closer to four years time, while increas-ing school capacities could not be necessary for well beyond ten years. The new and expanded schools listed below are intended to address potential capacity needs as identified the 2015 Eagle County School District Demographics and School Facilities Data report. While this report does indicate potentially significant school enrollment increases that could occur by 2030, projecting enrollment 15 years into the future is far more


speculation than it is science. As such, it should not be assumed that the school capacity improvements listed below will be nec-essary. The need for these potential improvements provide a basis for recommendations on how the District manages its land resources. Periodic updates to enrollment projections should be done to continually monitor these situations.

Improvements to Existing Buildings and FacilitiesThe following is recommended for existing schools and District facilities:

• Priority 3 and 4 improvements as identified on the Needs List for each school and building should be implemented in the next four to ten years.

New and Expanded Schools and Facilities New Haymeadow SchoolLong range enrollment projections (2030) for the Eagle area indicate potentially significant increases in elementary and middle school enrollments. While there is a certain risk in fore-casting enrollment fifteen years out, elementary and middle school seat deficits in 2030 could exceed 500. While a portion of these seats will be addressed by increasing capacity as a part of redeveloping EVES and EVMS, long term growth in Eagle is expected at some point to create the need for a new school, likely a K-8 school. The pending school land dedication to be provided by the Haymeadow development will provide a site to accommodate this new school.

Homestake Peak Expansion Enrollments on the east end of the County are expected to remain relatively flat or decline over the long-term and based on 2030 forecasts there is sufficient capacity to accommodate future capacity needs. There is however some uncertainty with respect to large residential projects in Avon and Minturn. The Avon Village project in Avon has the potential to develop ap-proximately 2,000 residential units. The Battle Mountain project

has approvals for a 1,700 unit vacation/second home commu-nity. It is speculated that this project may be re-branded to a different type of residential development. The type of units that are developed in these two projects will directly impact east end enrollment projections.

Due to the uncertainty of how these projects may develop, it is recommended that the 3 acres of vacant land west of Home-stake Peak (the location of old Meadow Mountain Elementary) be reserved in the event the expansion of Homestake Peak is necessary in the future. This situation should be monitored over time. Depending on how residential development occurs, this land could be deemed surplus in the future.

Eagle Valley High School/Gypsum Elementary/New IK Bar SchoolThe expansion and renovation of EVHS described above under near-term improvements should provide ample capacity to 2023 and beyond. Long-term projections indicate that EVHS enrollment could exceed 1,600 students by 2030. It is recom-mended that enrollments be closely monitored and that if needed, increased capacity high school capacity be provided by converting Gypsum Elementary School (GES) for high school use and replacing Gypsum Elementary by constructing a new elementary school at the IK Bar property.

Conversion of GES to high school use could address a num-ber of needs. GES could provide room for an expanded Red Canyon High School in the event the enrollment of that school continues to grow. Portions of GES could be used for new, al-ternative high school programs such a Career Technical Educa-tion program, a P-Tech program or experiential and internship based programs. GES could also have the potential to provide space for EVHS programs.

8. rECoMMEnDationS


It is the District’s preference that the enrollment of EVHS be maintained at approximately 1,300 students. An added benefit of these alternative high school programs is that they could at-tract students who would otherwise be enrolled in EVHS. These alternative programs could in effect reduce EVHS enrollment and potentially help maintain EVHS at approximately 1,300 students.

The IK Bar includes an undeveloped site that has been re-served for construction of a future school. If or when a second elementary school is constructed at the IK Bar, in lieu of two elementary schools a likely scenario would be to have one PK-2 school and one 3-5 school.

3rd Gypsum Elementary SchoolEnrollment growth in the Gypsum area could result in a deficit of nearly 350 elementary school seats by 2030. The District has a 10 acre parcel in the Buckhorn development that was pro-vided by the developer via school land dedication. This parcel provides the land necessary for a new elementary school if and when demand warrants.

lanD rESourCESThe District has a portfolio of thirteen undeveloped parcels, many of which are intended to accommodate new school facilities in the future. Refer to Chapter 7 for additional infor-mation on these parcels. The intended use for each of these parcels is described below.

Buckhorn Valley ParcelThis 10 acre site is being reserved for the future development of a third elementary school in Gypsum.

IK Bar ParcelThis +/-14 ac. parcel is being reserved for the future develop-

ment of an elementary school. This could potentially be a school to replace GES.

Haymeadow Parcel The dedication of this site to the District is pending. The 10-14 acre parcel will be reserved for the future development of a new elementary or K-8 school.

Bindley ParcelThis 6 acre site is reserved for the future development of athletic fields for Eagle Valley High School.

Eagle Vail/Homestake ParcelThis 3 acre parcel adjacent to Homestake Peak is being re-served for the future expansion to Homestake Peak School. Depending upon how a few large residential projects develop in the future, it is possible that this land may not be needed for expansion of Homestake Peak. Development patterns and enrollments should be monitored over time and the status of this land evaluated in the future.

RMR ParcelThis 40 acre parcel was originally purchased for the develop-ment of a second high school for the west end of the County. Due to significant issues with providing access and utilities to the site, the cost of a new high school and the ability to expand EVHS to accommodate future enrollment demands, the devel-opment of a high school on this site is no longer under consider-ation. It is recommended that this site be land banked for the forseeable future.

Valley Air-Park ParcelThis 2 acre parcel was purchased many years ago with the intention of using it for a west end transportation facility. The site has since been deemed to be too small for this use. There are currently no planned uses for this land. It is deemed surplus land.

8. rECoMMEnDationS


8. rECoMMEnDationS

Maloit ParkMaloit Park is approximately 87 acres of which 42 acres is des-ignated open space and 45 acres is “buildable”. Existing uses within these 45 acres include the Vail Ski and Snowboard Acad-emy, the Vail Community Fund and 15 manufacture/mobile homes. There are no additional District uses contemplated for Maloit Park. Subject to addressing existing uses and further site analysis, a portion of the 45 acres could be deemed surplus land.

IK Bar Residential ParcelsThe District owns a 10 acre parcel that is zoned for five Single- Family lots and a 2 acre parcel that is zoned for 8 Multi-family units. The intended use of these parcels is for residential devel-opment at some point in the future.

Gilman ParcelNo viable use due to location and the small size of this parcel. The District’s ownership of this parcel is subject to confirmation.

Berry Creek ParcelThe District has provided Snowboard Outreach Society (SOS) with an option to acquire this property. It is assumed that this option will be exercised and the District will convey this land to SOS.

Avon VillageThe Avon Village developers are obligated to provide a 3.8 acre parcel to the District in order to satisfy their school land dedication requirement. There is no timetable for when this dedication will occur, nor are there assurances regarding the lo-cation or quality of this site. There are no recommendations on the use of this site until such time more is known about the land to be dedicated.

FaCility MaStEr Plan iMPlEMEntationThis FMP identifies the District’s current and future facility needs and provides a framework for decision-making regarding future capital improvements. The recommendations in this Plan are general in nature and additional work will be necessary prior to making final decisions on the implementation of any school or facility improvements. Below is a brief outline of steps that will need to be taken prior to implementing the recommendations of the Plan.

Community OutreachAn underlying goal of this Plan is to ensure that decisions are aligned with the priorities of the District and the community. Additional input from the community will be necessary in order to better define improvement plans. This is particularly true with respect to school expansions and new school buildings. Fol-lowing approval of this Plan, addition outreach will be done at individual schools in order to further engage the community on specifc improvement plans.

Improvements to Existing FacilitiesImprovements needed at existing schools have been identi-fied and prioritized based on when they are needed. While the building inventories that resulted in the Needs List for each school and building were exhaustive, it will be necessary to further evaluate the priority of improvements prior to imple-mentation. This is particularly true with Priority 2 and Priority 3 improvements. A Near-Term recommendation of this Plan is to implement Priority 1 and Priority 2 improvements to existing schools and facilities. Depending on funding availability and other considerations, it may be prudent to include some Priority 3 items in Near-Term improvements.


8. rECoMMEnDationS

New or expanded schools and facilitiesMany decisions will need to be made regarding the design and development of new schools. In addition to completing more detailed design and cost estimating, additional analysis will be necessary to determine the capacity of new schools. Commu-nity input will also influence decisions on specific school features and in the case of the 3rd Street Campus whether a K-8 school or separate elementary and middle schools are developed.

Other District ImprovementsThere are a number of district-wide initiatives recommended in the FMP that will need further study in order to define the specific improvements that will be implemented. For example, Priority 1 and Priority 2 improvements include a budget for each school and district building for sustainable energy and all el-ementary schools include a budget for improvements to Pre-K facilities. Specific improvements to be provided by this fund-ing will need to be determined for each school. A major ele-ment of district-wide technology improvements is the possibility of the District installing a fiber optic line to connect all schools and facilities. Alternatives for implementing these lines and related cost considerations are under evaluation. A central-ized Operations Hub is proposed for down-valley transportation, maintenance and technology. An appropriate location for the Operations Hub will need to be acquired in order to imple-ment this improvement. These and other decisions will need to be made in order to better define specific improvements to be implemented.

Improvement Costs and FundingUnderstanding the cost of improvements will be a key consider-ation in finalizing improvement plans. While conceputal esti-mates of probable costs have been prepared, more detailed cost estimating will be done in conjunction with more detailed design that will be done for each improvement.

Alternatives for how school districts can fund capital improve-ments are limited. While approval of a bond measure by the voters of Eagle County is the most likely way to finance new and improved buildings, the evaluation of all possible funding alter-natives such as BEST Grants will be necessary.

Enrollment ProjectionsThe need for additional school capacity has been identified by the recently completed Eagle County School District Build-ing Capacity Study. Due to the multitude of variables involved in forecasting school enrollment, it will be essential that school enrollments be closely monitored and that this study is updated on a periodic basis. Decisions on when to update this study will be made based on enrollment trends.


9. aPPEnDix

1. Building Fact Sheets 2. Eagle County School District Building Capacity Study, 2012, TAB Associates, Inc.3. Eagle County School District Facilities Energy Assessment Report, Ameresco 4. Eagle County School District Demographics and School Facilities Data, December 2015, Western Demographics, Inc.

Eagle County School District 2016 Facility Master Plan

Building Fact Sheets

Avon Elementary

Battle Mountain High

Berry Creek Middle

Brush Creek Elementary

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle Valley Elementary

Eagle Valley High

Eagle Valley Middle

Edwards Elementary

Gypsum Creek Middle

Gypsum Elementary

Homestake Peak Pk-8

June Creek Elementary

Red Canyon High – East

Red Canyon High - West

Red Hill Elementary

Red Sandstone Elementary


East Bus Barn

3rd Street Building/ West Bus Barn, Food Service, Technology

District Offices – Chambers Avenue

Maintenance

Avon Elementary Avon Elementary Principal: Roy Getchell, Phd Mascot: Bear Cubs Colors: Royal Blue and White

Square Footage: 67,780 Built- 1996 Site Acreage: 10 acres. Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 443, Stressed 466) w/o PreK Enrollment 2014/2015: 330 w/ pk Enrollment 2015/2016: 275/ 317 w/ pk 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 295 2020 Projected Enrollments- 264, 264, 264 2023 Projected Enrollments- 235, 235, 235 * Projected Enrollments are with out Pre-K. Staff and Teacher Size: 40 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 153 S.F.)

Replacement Cost: $27.1 Million. Cost of return: 16% of Replacement Cost. Level of Need: Fair Recommendations: Address Priorities 1 - 4. Facility Needs - Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life

Secured Entries, Door Access Systems, Cameras

Educational Growth – Physical Environment

Building Preservation

Equity LCD Projectors in Classrooms Furniture Replacements

Community Site Circulation – Parent Drop Off/ Pick Up Playground Upgrades, Replacement Serving Line Upgrades

Environmental Sustainability HVAC Upgrade- Revise Ventilation Issues Lighting Upgrades Renewable Energy

* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. Mission/ Goals Avon offers a powerful dual language program. The program has two goals: that all students become multilingual to be internationally-competitive later in life; and that English Language Learning students accelerate their mastery of English. The program is a research-based, proven, and complex combination of scheduled, structural, integrated, and sequential instruction of English as a Second Language (ESL) and Spanish as a Second Language (SSL). Evaluation School Community- Specific, partnerships Only public school located in the city limits of Avon. Avon Elementary is a National Blue Ribbon School, the highest honor bestowed on public schools by the U.S. Department of Education. Avon received this recognition due to its rapid turnaround and significant increases in student growth on achievement tests. This was no small feat. The school experienced a huge demographic shift with the influx of Spanish speaking students and families. Avon had to rapidly adapt to the unique and diverse needs of these students. School leaders reached out to the community and developed innovative and robust relationships and programs that tackled barriers to learning for all of

Avon Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 2

their students. The Vail Valley Motorcycle Association provided free breakfast for students, addressing a tremendous barrier to learning. The Youth Foundation organized and began providing after school programs for structured play and extended learning. Students could now complete, and get help with, their homework instead of going home to empty houses. The Vail Valley Foundation organized arts, dance, and music programs to provide enrichment and creative brain stimulation. Vail Resorts offered scholarships so all kids could participate in Learn to Ski and become immersed in local culture. The district's first in-school health clinic opened in Avon Elementary, providing free, or reduced cost, health and dental care on the spot. Absences declined and well-being improved. (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Section is progress. Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships In school Health Clinic. Dual Language program. Utilization High community use of gym and other spaces. Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: More to follow Educational Technology: Additional learning boards. Need for higher computer count. Safety Secured entry is not available. A potential to use the existing vestibule and open directly into the office is possible. With some additional office renovations. Fire Alarm- Update fire alarm panel and devices. Card Access- Due to high public use card access could be used to limit keys distributed for Public use. Easier control of exterior doors.

Codes The structure was built during the initial stages of the federal accessibility standards. In general the building meets the standards when it was built. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Programs Delivered in Facility Dual Language programming. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Variable Speed HW Pumps Destratification Replace aging HVAC Systems Radiant Heaters in Gyms Improve Ventilation Install new high efficiency water fixtures Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Install controls for Heat Tape Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize Ice Maker

Utilities

Annual Cost - $68,548 Cost per Square Foot – $1.01

Maintenance- Custodial and Systems.

Replace equipment. Acquire lifts.

Recommended Cost per year and cost per SF to maintain each facility

2.5% of Replacement Cost – existing building - $677,500 $9.88 per SF

Avon Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 3

SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; No large deficiencies noted. Operating well within the occupancy. District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations District Summary of Major Deficiencies Parking availability is limited. Existing parking provides for 84 spots in which some are shared with the adjacent Avon tennis and basketball courts. Average requirements is approximately 68 spots. We did notice there are still many spots remaining empty to the east in the main lot. So, depending on number of spots used for the Avon courts the parking could be adequate. Site circulation is another matter. Although the school has a large population which can walk or ride to school many students are still dropped off via vehicle. Without a proper drop off pattern the site gets congested. It has been suggested to provide a loop around the school to provide a one way travel verses the two way entry exit at the school. The existing playground needs upgraded surfacing. The current pea gravel surfacing is heavily compacted and does not meet the required code. New surfacing should be provided. In addition, many of the playground pieces have broken and need replacement. Some level of repair could occur without a total replacement of the equipment. If the playground is relocated due to site circulation issues it may make sense to replace the equipment with the move. Existing asphalt and concrete walks need repairs. General Observations

In general the building is functioning as designed. Site circulation and parking stress the site and create hazards and

strict limitations. With almost 20 years of use the building is beginning to see the end

of life of many items such as FFE, carpet, painting and etc. Need to consider how to begin rotation schedules for items needing replacement.

Security vestibule needed. Summary of Principal Interview: Building Issues High Priority Issues

Security Vestibule Key Card Entry

Asphalt Repairs Playground Update Site circulation, additional parking

Medium Priority Issues No issues.

Low Priority Issues No issues.

Wants Technology upgrade. Smart boards. Higher computer count.

Uniqueness Community Use – Town Rec everyday. Dual Language

Utilization No issues.

Enrollment – 2014-2015 (330 w/ pk) 2015-2016 (330 w/ pk) 443/ 466 capacity. Staff- 24, 40 Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues

Hand washing sinks for students and parents. Pre-School – verify impact levels of surfacing, metal fencing and

head entrapment. Priorities

Confirmed. Technology should be moved to one. Carpet high issue.

Avon ElementaryFacility Needs List

Priority GP CategoryGuiding Principles

Maint. Cat. Maintenance Category

1 High Health, Safety, Security, Student Life 1 1 Assets Protection‐ Critical, Life Safety2 Medium Financial Investment/ 21st Century 2 2 Assets Protection‐ Cost Reduction, Preventative Maintenance3 Low Equity 3 3 Productivity‐ Learning Experience Enhancement4 Future Community 4 4 Quality Assurance‐ Public, Parent, Staff, Student, Pride

Sustainability 5 5 Wants‐ Preferred items to be added by Staff

Priority School Area Item Cat. Cat. Action Year1 AES GRDS Playground Media 2 1 Gravel . Add media 20161 AES GRDS Sidewalks 2 1 Replace as needed. 30% 20161 AES INT Kitchen 1 1 Caulk and seal 2016

1 AES EXT Parking Lot Asphalt 1 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe. Done in 2007. Mill 20161 AES INT Drinking Fountains 2 2 Fountains need replaced 20161 AES INT Interior Paint 2 3 Repaint every 10 years 20161 AES INT Cafeteria 2 4 Add acoustics 20161 AES INT Stage 2 4 Carpet needs to be replace with a dark tile 2016

1 AES INT Carpet 2 3Replace every 30 years. 2011 new C&C hallway carpet. Replace classroom carpet 2015 2017

1 AES GRDS Playground Media 2 1Pre‐School Playground Code Issues ‐ Surfacing attentuation level and head entrapment in metal fencing. 2016

1 AES INT Gym 2 1Tartan floor ‐ contains mercury. Cracked. Needs replacement. Research high use flooring 2016

1 AES INTSecured Entrance/ All Doors Lockedat Main Entrance 1 1

Provide reconfiguration of main office for vestibule entrance, provide electronic lock and visual into vestibule. 2016

1 AES SYS Card Access System 1 1Add card access system to control three doors. Door detection system all doors. Remove existing burglar alarm. 2016

1 AES IT Security Cameras 1 2 Front Entry and drop off coverage. 20161 AES GRDS Bus/Parent Drop Off Circulation 4 3 Inadequate. Redesign at renovation 20161 AES INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 AES INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 20161 AES IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 2016

End Priority One

2 AES GRDS Playground Equipment 1 3Redesign playground add additional features (maybe part of circulation budget) Possible GOCO grant. 2016

2 AES GRDS Site 2 3West end create drainage system at prek stairs. Rear parking lot has drainage and ice issues. Redesign at renovation 2016






Priority School Area Item Cat. Cat. Action Year

2 AES EXT Windows 2 250% of windows have lost their seal. Need replacement. Classroom windows need to be reframed 25% 2016

2 AES HVAC VFD 5 3 Add 11 VFD 20162 AES KITCH Cafeteria Tables 4 3 Replace every 15 years 20162 AES INT Operable walls 2 1 Re‐vinyl, refurbish and 2 at stage 20162 AES EXT Roof 2 2 Replace Partial Roofing ‐ EPDM and Asphalt Shingle 20182 AES EXT Heat Tape 2 1 Replace every 10 years . Replaced 2006, Add controls 2018

2 AES EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 Caulk and seal ‐ exterior doors, windows/replace sealants, masonry, etc 20202 AES IT Technology 4 2 Networking Cable Upgrade or Wireless upgrades 20232 AES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 2 Put on JCI controls. Half of lot lighting belongs to Town of Avon 2023

2 AES INT Restrooms 2 3Replace fixtures every 25 years. Faucets and valves need replacement. Hard water 2016

2 AES INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 20202 AES INT HVAC 2 2 Replace aging Equipment 20202 AES INT HVAC 2 2 Improve Ventilation 2020

2 AES MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 AES KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 AES INT Windows 5 1,2 install reflective film at south, east and west facing windows 20232 AES INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 AES EQUIP Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Reach In Replacement ‐ CFC, HCFS 20182 AES EQUIP Grounds 2 2 Snow removal equipment 2018

End Priority Two

3 AES INT FF&E 3 3 Replace every 25 years 20163 AES HVAC Kitchen Heat 2 2 OK. Add to DDC 20163 AES INT Custodial Equipment 2 2 Replace every 10 years 20163 AES INT Occupancy Sensors 5 2 None. Add 20163 AES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 3 Retrofit to LED 20163 AES INT Residential Appliances 2 3 Replace every 10 years. Review for replacement 20163 AES KITCH Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Rotate equipment as needed. Assess at 15 years for rotation. OK 2016






Priority School Area Item Cat. Cat. Action Year3 AES GRDS Landscaping 1 3 Refurbish/ Security Issues Resolved 20163 AES INT Window Coverings 2 2 Replace every 15 years. Venetian blinds 20183 AES KITCH Flooring 2 2 Epoxy. Review and repair as needed 20183 AES INT Acoustical Ceiling 2 3 Partial Replacement every 20 years. 20203 AES EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 OK. EIFS repaired and recoated 2011. Recoat every 10 years 20203 AES GRDS Irrigation Systems 5 3 Install wireless controls district wide, optimize system 20203 AES KITCH Serving Line 4 4 OK. Review for upgrade 20203 AES INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20233 AES INT HVAC 5 2 Radiant Heaters in Gyms 20233 AES KITCH Ice Makers 5 2 Optimize Ice Makers‐ Heat Exchangers 20233 AES INT Equipment 2 2 Provide Lifts 2023

End Priority Three

4 AES EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 20234 AES EXT Signage 4 4 OK. Add monument sign 2023

End Priority Four

Battle Mountain High Battle Mountain High Principal: Phil Qualman (Interviewed)- Current Dr. Lourra Barthuly Mascot: Huskies Colors: Black and Gold

Square Footage: 209,000 Built: 2009 Site Acreage: 39 acres. Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 1169, Stressed 1375) Enrollment 2014/2015: 850 Enrollment 2015/2016: 861 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 751 2020 Projected Enrollments- 913, 921, 937 2023 Projected Enrollments- 907, 927, 955 Staff and Teacher Size: 48 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 173 S.F.)

Replacement Cost: $62.7 Million. Cost of return: 6.2% of Replacement Cost. Level of Need: Good Recommendations: Priorities 1- 4 Facility Needs - Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life

Door Access Systems Upgrade, Additional Cameras


Building Preservation Consider Building Addition – Capacity Issues

Equity LCD Projectors in Classrooms Capacity Issues

Community Landscape Changes Environmental Sustainability HVAC Re-Commissioning

Lighting Upgrades Renewable Energy

* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. Mission/ Goals Battle Mountain High School is a four-year comprehensive high school accredited by the Colorado Department of Education. It holds membership in the National Association of College Admission Counseling and Colorado Council of High School/College Relations. Based on state expectations and achievement data, Battle Mountain has the highest rating for the Colorado Department of Education performance plans. Students experience challenging academics, a large variety of athletics, fun activities and social events, and develop a sense of community as a Battle Mountain Husky. Upper Classmen mentor and help incoming Freshmen adapt to high school. With both academic and technical opportunities for enrichment, graduating Huskies are prepared to follow their dreams to the college or technical school of their choice. Parents are welcome and active supporters of our school and their community, rounding out a robust community of learners, parents, and educators. School Community- Specific, partnerships Located in Miller Ranch in Edwards Colorado. Battle Mountain is the public school for the upper Eagle Valley.

Battle Mountain High Facility Evaluation Page - 2

(Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Shared food service kitchen with Colorado Mountain College. Section is progress. Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships Part of Miller Ranch Educational hub. VERY high community use. Utilization Current teacher count and classrooms are full. Feels need for additional classrooms and specifically additional Science rooms. Wood shop underutilized. Not currently used. Computer labs not fully utilized throughout day. Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: More to follow Educational Technology: Current. Safety Card Access- Due to high public use card access could be used to limit keys distributed for Public use. Easier control of exterior doors. Codes No issues. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Programs Delivered in Facility Standard Colorado Department of Education. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit

Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Destratification Install radiant gas heaters in gyms Install new high efficiency water fixtures Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize Ice Maker Install air curtain at kitchen door

Utilities



Replace equipment. Recommended Cost per year and cost per SF to maintain each facility

1.5% of Replacement Cost - $873,600 $4,17 per SF

SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; Operating at 70% of capacity. Science room deficiency. District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations District Summary of Major Deficiencies Existing asphalt and concrete walks need repairs. General Observations

In general the building is functioning as designed. There are some current concerns with classrooms and science

rooms. There did appear to be room for reconfiguration of schedules and using classrooms and computers room to a high efficiency. But, would require additional staff.

Summary of Principal Interview: Phil Qualman (Interviewed)- Current Dr. Lourra Barthuly- updated.

Battle Mountain High Facility Evaluation Page - 3

Building Issues High Priority Issues

Current student enrolment of 850. Capacity Issue no an issue. School is looking into a utilization program to help better schedule classrooms. Better utilize building.

Security of main entry. Currently front vestibule office door is not locked. Design intent is in place but requires additional personnel at window to buzz people into office from vestibule.

How to deal with large groups? Access into building and controlling when they are in the building.

Need to add additional science rooms. Renovation of existing classrooms possible with roaming carts and shared use of classroom.

Upgrades of landscaping and weed control. Medium Priority Issues

Would like to more general classrooms. Athletic storage at fields. Academic Storage.

Low Priority Issues Vehicle access ramp to baseball field. Concrete infill behind and around main bleachers to contain

gravel. Ticket taker booth.

Wants Additional Classroom Athletic Field upgrades

Uniqueness Very high community activity.

Utilization Wood shop underutilized. Would like to grow CTE course in

space. Computer labs not fully occupied.

Enrollment – 2014-2015 (850) 1,200 capacity. (25 per classroom) Staff- 48 teachers.

Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues

No new issues. Need additional office person for front door attendant.

Priorities Confirmed priorities. Additional science rooms top priority Street lighting at roundabout was noted as necessary. Moved to

three.

Battle Mountain HighFacility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year

1 BMHS EXT Parking Lot 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe. Every 3 years 2016

1 BMHS GRDS Site 1 3Add Lighting, pedestrian flashing sign and crosswalk to ECO bus stop across road. 2016

1 BMHS GRDS Sidewalks 1 2 OK. Replace as needed every 3 years 20161 EVHS EXT Field Equipment for Turf 2 2 Provide litter CAT and Turf Vac for synthetic tuf maintenance. 20161 EVHS EXT Baseball Field 4 4 Bleachers at Baseball field 20161 BMHS INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 2016

1 BMHS INT Doors 1 1Change existing door detection system to be able to notify which door is open and not just zones. Door access system Tied to student ID cards? 2016

1 BMHS INT Security Cameras 1 1Update software to be more user friendly. Add more cameras. Investigate ability for cameras to be operated by motion. 2016

1 BMHS INT Capacity Issues 3 1 Science Rooms. Renovation of existing classrooms? 20161 BMHS INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 BMHS IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 2016

End Priority One

2 BMHS INT Locker Room Showers 4 3Repipe the showers. Delete mixing valves in showers. Install pressure balance valves. 8 total. Hot water issues in showers ‐ user group complaint 2016

2 BMHS GRDS Pumphouse 2 4 OK. Restain 20162 BMHS INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 2020

2 BMHS MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 BMHS KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 BMHS INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 BMHS EXT Landscape redesign 1 and 5 3 Reduce labor intensive installations/ review security upgrades 2016

End Priority Two

3 BMHS INT Emergency Elevator 1 1 Battery Back up 20163 BMHS EXT Stadium 1 1 Replace gravel as sidewalk behind belachers. 20163 BMHS EXT Parking Lot 2 4 Add asphalt to maintenance storage area (rolled millings) 20163 BMHS EXT Storage 2 4 Add shed for sanding truck at mtce yard 2016

Battle Mountain HighFacility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year3 BMHS INT Custodial Equipment 2 1 replace every 10 years 20163 BMHS INT Interior Paint 2 3 Repaint every 10 years 20163 BMHS EXT Parking Lot 5 2 Replace Parking lot lights with LED 20163 BMHS INT Auditorium 5 2 Replace Pendant lights with LED 20163 BMHS EXT Windows 2 2 Review replace fogged windows as needed 20163 BMHS EXT Heat Tape 2 1 Replace every 10 years 20193 BMHS INT Overhead Doors 2 1 6 doors. Refurbish overhead doors every 10 years 20193 BMHS GRDS Snow Removal Equipment 2 2 OK, Replace tractor every 10 years 20203 BMHS INT Bleachers 2 2 Refurbish at 10 years 20203 BMHS INT Residential Appliances 2 3 Replace every 10 years 20203 BMHS GRDS Running Track 2 2 OK ‐ new in 2009/ Repairs 20203 BMHS INT Lighting ‐ Interior 5 2 Upgrade watt stopper lighting control system 20203 BMHS EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 4 1 Install lighting at the round‐a‐bout. Partner with county if possible 20203 BMHS GRDS Irrigation Systems 5 4 Add wireless control for irrigation systems/ District Control System 20203 BMHS INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20233 BMHS INT HVAC 5 2 Radiant Heaters in Gyms 20233 BMHS KITCH Ice Makers 5 2 Optimize Ice Makers‐ Heat Exchangers 20233 BMHS KITCH HVAC 5 2 Air Curtain at Door 20233 BMHS INT Woodshop Equipment 1 4 Replace equipment with instant shut offs ‐ safety issue 2020

End Priority Three

4 BMHS EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 20234 BMHS EXT Parking Lot 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe. Every 3 years 20204 BMHS EXT Fields 4 5 Additional Athletic Storage 20234 BMHS EXT Site 2, 4 4 Revise curbs to allow vehicle access to baseball field 20234 BMHS EXT Stadium 4 5 Ticket Booth 20234 BMHS GRDS Fields 4 4 Add turf for baseball field 20234 BMHS GRDS Fields 4 3 OK. Artificial Turf. Replace every 10 years 2021

End Priority Four

Berry Creek Middle Berry Creek Middle Principal: Amy Vanwel Mascot: Wildcats Colors: Purple and Black

Square Footage: 80,552 Site Acreage: 16.7 acres. Built: 1996 Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 466, Stressed 548) Enrollment 2014/2015: 382 Enrollment 2015/2016: 384 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 328 2020 Projected Enrollments- 364, 367, 373 2023 Projected Enrollments- 311, 317, 326 Staff and Teacher Size: 38 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 173 S.F.) Replacement Cost: $32 Million. Cost of return: 21.2% of Replacement Cost. Level of Need: Fair

Recommendations: Priorities 1- 4 Facility Needs - Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life

Secured Entries, Door Access Systems, Cameras Site Issues – parking lot, sidewalks


Building Preservation New Carpet

Equity LCD Projectors in Classrooms Furniture Replacements New Lockers

Community Playground Upgrades Gymnasium Expansion

Environmental Sustainability HVAC Upgrade- Revise Ventilation Issues Lighting Upgrades Renewable Energy

* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. School Mission Mission: The Berry Creek Middle School community believes that our mission is to teach students how to learn, to prepare each student to achieve at their highest levels, and to prepare each student to contribute in the broadest sense to the betterment of the school community as well as to the community-at-large. Vision: A Community Educating Inspired Learners We demonstrate PRIDE: Preparedness Respectfulness Integrity Dependability Effort Berry Creek educators are committed to the following beliefs about learning:

students learn best when instruction is varied in its practice and is individualized to students’ particular learning styles and levels

students learn best when they are fully engaged and self-motivated students learn best by experience and by developing higher levels of

mastery when they can apply learned knowledge and skills to new situations.

We further believe: students learn best when the school's demanding curricula provide exposure to diverse experiences opportunities for creative activity broad engagement in cooperative endeavors focused on real world

lessons

Berry Creek Middle Facility Evaluation Page - 2

students learn best when they are challenged to set high goals and to independently reflect on and assess their progress in achieving those goals

students learn best when assessment by the school is designed not only to assess current levels of achievement, but also to establish new goals for achievement

students learn best in safe environments where expectations and positive behavior supports are consistently and effectively communicated and implemented

students learn best when the entire community fully supports their learning in all regards: personal, social, and emotional

School Community- Specific, partnerships Located in Miller Ranch in Edwards Colorado. Only stand alone middle school up valley. (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Section is progress. Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships Part of Miller Ranch Educational hub. Utilization Bleachers are undersized for events. Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: Need to update data and power. Update wireless access. Educational Technology: More computers and chrome carts. Safety Secured entry is not available. A potential to use the existing vestibule and open directly into the office is possible. With some additional office renovations. Card Access- Due to high public use card access could be used to limit keys distributed for Public use. Easier control of exterior doors.

Marmot – site hole, tripping. Codes No issues. Environmental, Indoor air-quality Ventilation system need to be reworked. Does not provide adequate fresh air. Programs Delivered in Facility Standard Colorado Department of Education. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Variable Speed HW Pumps Destratification Replace aging HVAC Systems Radiant Heaters in Gyms Improve Ventilation Independent heat in kitchen Install new high efficiency water fixtures Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Install controls for Heat Tape Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize Ice Maker

Utilities




Berry Creek Middle Facility Evaluation Page - 3

Recommended Cost per year and cost per SF to maintain each facility 3% of Replacement Cost - $960,000 $11.91 per SF

SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; No large deficiencies noted. Operating well within the occupancy. Approaching capacity but Capacity study shows declining numbers. There is a small continued growth over the next 5 years but shows a decline after. District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations District Summary of Major Deficiencies Existing asphalt and concrete walks need repairs. Playground upgrades wanted. General Observations

In general the building is functioning as designed. With almost 20 years of use the building is beginning to see the end

of life of many items such as FFE, carpet, painting and etc. Need to consider how to begin rotation schedules for items needing replacement.

Summary of Principal Interview: Building Issues High Priority Issues

Carpet Interior Paint Secured Vestibule.

Medium Priority Issues Auditorium- Partition wall, curtain, functions poorly. Simpler

layout with fixed wall? Furniture- 20 years. Mixed and matched need consolidation. Card Entry Access, security Bleachers- manual bleachers may only need to be refurbished.

Bi-annual maintenance. Windows- seals and operation.

Low Priority Issues Site- More permanent playground features.

Wants More computers, chrome carts.

Uniqueness Part of school community shared with JCES, RCHS, and ECCA.


Enrollment – 2014-2015 (382) 2015-2016 (360/400) 466 capacity. Staff- 38 (4 Staff, 2 Custodial, 25 Teachers)


Baseball field upgrade Sidewalk stairs near stop sign- handrail missing and full of

gravel. Upgrade basketball courts. Marmots- Issue with holes, tripping issues. Asphalt issues.

Priorities Confirmed issue locations. May need to consider playground upgrades move to one. May need to consider wood shop upgrades move to one.

Berry Creek MiddleFacility Needs List






1 BCMS GRDS Sidewalks 2 1Redesign, replace all sidewalks, with expansion joints, at front of building, various repairs and handrails 2016

1 BCMS KITCH Kitchen Equipment 2 1 Dishwasher replacement 2016

1 BCMS GRDS Asphalt 2 2Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe. Replace 10,000 sq feet, mill balance and overlay 1.5" throughout 2016

1 BCMS GRDS Playground Asphalt 2 2 Seal coated in 2008. Needs mill and overlay with 1.5', restripe 20161 BCMS INT FFE 3 2 Classrooms 20161 BCMS INT Bleachers 2 3 Refurbish bleachers every 10 years 2016

1 BCMS INT Cafeteria 2 3Refurbish cafeteria. Paint, repair operable wall, auditorium entrance, add reflective tint to avoid passive solar gain 2016

1 BCMS INT Interior Paint 2 3Paint life expectancy 15 years. Repaint walls, doors,door frames, window frames. (corridor side) 2016

1 BCMS INT Carpeting 2 2 Classrooms and offices, hallways VCT to Carpet 20161 BCMS INT Theatre Curtains 1 3 Clean and fireproof 20161 BCMS EXT Site 1 1 Address ‐ ground squirrels, holes in ground 20161 BCMS INT Interior Storage 2 4 OK.Reorganize gym storage area at gym exit 2016

1 BCMS INTSecured Entrance/ All Doors Lockedat Main Entrance 1 1


1 BCMS IT Security Cameras 1 3 Front Entry and drop off coverage. Additional Exterior Coverage. 2016

1 BCMS SYS Card Access System 1 3Add card access system to control four doors. Door detection system all doors. Remove existing burglar alarm. 2016

1 BCMS HVAC System 4 3 Home Ec room needs redesign. Needs A/C. Room overheats 20161 BCMS KITCH Cafeteria Tables 2 2 replace every 15 years. See FF&E 20161 BCMS INT Paging Systems 2 2 Replace outdated Paging System Backboard 20201 BCMS EXT Playground 4 5 Redesign playground add additional features. Parklike. 20201 BCMS INT Woodshop Equipment 1 3 OK. Upgrade to safer equipment 20201 BCMS INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 20161 BCMS INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 BMCS IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 2016

End Priority Four

2 BCMS INT Audtorium 4 4 Reconfigure Partition Walls 20162 BCMS GRDS Fields 4 4 Upgrade‐ regrade, address baseball field 2016






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year2 BCMS INT Woodshop Equipment 1 1 Add interlock to dust collector 20162 BCMS KITCH Kitchen 2 1 Caulk and seal countertops 20162 BCMS EXT Windows 2 2 Operable windows need new seals 20162 BCMS EXT Windows 2 2 Replace seals on exterior doors and windows, replace fogged windows. 20162 BCMS EXT Roof 2 2 Re Roof 20182 BCMS GRDS Snow Removal Equipment 2 2 Add tractor storage‐ combine other units to one. 2016

2 BCMS HVAC Kitchen Heat 2 3Stand alone RTUs. Due for replacement in 4‐5 years. Upgrade controls on kitchen heat. Stand alone heat in Kitchen. 2018

2 BCMS HVAC System 2 3 Add 17 VFDs 20182 BCMS INT Gas Shut Offs 1 3 Need to be upgraded, not in code. Science rooms 20182 BCMS IT Conditioned IDF Rooms 2 3 Portable units. Need to be replaced 20162 BCMS INT Hallways 3 4 Additional Tack boards in Hallways 20182 BCMS INT Carpet 2 3 Not C&A. Replace in 20 years 20182 BCMS INT Gym Floor 2 3 Sand/refinish every 20 years 20182 BCMS IT Technology 2 2 Networking Cable Upgrade or Wireless upgrades, pod to pod fiber 20202 BCMS INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 20202 BCMS INT HVAC 2 2 Replace aging Equipment 20202 BCMS INT HVAC 2 2 Improve Ventilation 2020

2 BCMS MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 BCMS KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 BCMS INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 BCMS INT Windows 5 2 Add reflective film at south and east facing windows 20162 AES EQUIP Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Reach In Replacement ‐ CFC, HCFS 2020

End Priority Four

3 BCMS KITCH Flooring 2 2 new epoxy on floor every 20 years. Steam clean, recoat 20163 BCMS KITCH Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Rotate equipment as needed. Assess at 15 years for rotation 20163 BCMS INT Residential Appliances 2 3 replace every 10 years 2016

3 BCMS EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 1 Connect exterior lighting to JCI controls ($5,000) ‐ ENERGY EFFICIENCY 2016







3 BCMS GRDS Site 1 4Add sidewalk at rear of building to bb asphalt for fire egress. Review egress with fire marshal. Add paths from school to neighborhood. 2016

3 BCMS INT Tile 2 4 Replace cafeteria, custodial VCT 2016

3 BCMS EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 4Replace all bollards with LED pole lights, Replace Parking lot lights with LED, Dark sky compliant 2016

3 BCMS GRDS Irrigation 2 4 Install irrigation at bus loop island‐ redesign for no irrigation. 20163 BCMS GRDS Landscaping 5 4 Upgrade‐ redesign 20183 BCMS GRDS Trash/Recycle 1 4 Redesign dumpster/recycle areas 20183 BCMS INT Custodial Equipment 2 2 replace every 10 years 20183 BCMS INT Restrooms 2 2 Replace fixtures every 20 years 20183 BCMS INT Restrooms 2 2 Replace plumbing hardware every 20 years, finish renovations 20183 BCMS INT Acoustical Ceiling 2 3 Partial Replacement every 20 years (includes device reinstallation) 20183 BCMS INT Doors 2 3 Replace Panic hardware every 20 years. OK 20183 BCMS INT Locker Room Lockers 2 3 Renovate every 20 years 20183 BCMS INT Student Lockers 2 3 Replace every 20 years 20183 BCMS SYS Fire Alarm System 2 1 OK. Fire alarm upgrade every 20 years 20203 BCMS EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 Caulk and seal building exteriors 20203 BCMS EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 Repaired, painted 2011, refinish eifs 20203 BCMS INT Restrooms 2 2 Toilet partitions. Replace at renovation 20203 BCMS INT Window Coverings 2 2 Venetian blinds. Some need replacement. Replace every 15 years 20203 BCMS GRDS Irrigation Systems 5 3 Install wireless controls district wide 20203 BCMS INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20233 BCMS KITCH Ice Makers 5 2 Optimize Ice Makers‐ Heat Exchangers 20233 BCMS INT Equipment 2 2 Provide Lifts 2023

End Priority Four

4 BCMS EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 20234 BCMS INT Insulation 5 3 Upgrade to code at bond. Coordinate with roof replacement 20234 BCMS EXT Scoreboards 4 4 N/A. Install exterior scoreboard 20234 BCMS GRDS Running Track 3 4 N/A. Install track 2023

End Priority Four

Brush Creek Elementary Brush Creek Elementary Principal: Stephanie Gianneschi (Interviewed)- Current, Brooke Cole Mascot: Bobcats Colors: Teal and Silver

Square Footage: 65,143 Built: 2001 Site Acreage: 10.3 acres. Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 489, Stressed 514) w/o PreK Enrollment 2014/2015: 439 w/ pk Enrollment 2015/2016: 424 w/ pk 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 553 2020 Projected Enrollments- 374, 380, 392 2023 Projected Enrollments- 378, 396, 414 * Projected Enrollments are with out Pre-K. Staff and Teacher Size: 47 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 133 S.F.) Replacement Cost: $26 Million. Cost of return: 10.6% of Replacement Cost. Level of Need: Good





Equity LCD Projectors in Classrooms Environmental Sustainability HVAC Upgrade- Revise Ventilation

Issues Lighting Upgrades Renewable Energy

* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. School Mission Brush Creek Elementary is a Colorado John Irwin School of Excellence serving the community of Eagle Ranch in Eagle. John Irwin schools demonstrate excellent academic achievement that exceeds expectations established by the Colorado Department of Education. Mission To provide the highest quality academic experience for our students so they succeed in the 21st Century. Vision A safe, collaborative and rigorous learning environment in which all students are held to high expectations and are active participants in their learning process. Values- Integrity and Honesty, Teamwork and Collaboration, Dependability, Compassion, Enjoyment and Fun School Community- Specific, partnerships One of two public elementary schools in Eagle. Located in Eagle Ranch (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Section is progress. Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships Very high volume of students ride bikes to school. High Community use- Church, WECMRD, Karate. Utilization High community use of gym.

Brush Creek Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 2

Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: More to follow Educational Technology: In classroom LCDs. Safety Secured entry is not available. A potential to use the existing vestibule and open directly into the office is possible. With some additional office renovations. Card Access- Due to high public use card access could be used to limit keys distributed for Public use. Easier control of exterior doors. Codes No issues. Environmental, Indoor air-quality Upper Level classrooms get very hot. Programs Delivered in Facility Standard Colorado Department of Education. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Variable Speed HW Pumps Destratification Radiant Gas Heaters in Gym Install new high efficiency water fixtures Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Install controls for Heat Tape Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers

Optimize Ice Maker Install air curtain for kitchen door

Utilities





SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; No large deficiencies noted. Operating well within the occupancy. District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations District Summary of Major Deficiencies Existing asphalt and concrete walks need repairs. Minor playground repairs and replacement of parts. Some parts of equipment is tapped off and not in use. General Observations

In general the building is functioning as designed. Buildings are over ten years old and generally holding up well but

need typical maintenance and start to consider rotation schedules for future items in 5 plus years.

Security vestibule. Summary of Principal Interview: Building Issues High Priority Issues

Security Vestibule Key Card Entry Asphalt Repairs Upstairs classrooms (Hot)

Medium Priority Issues Dumpster concrete repairs

Brush Creek Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 3

Low Priority Issues Stage stair repairs Playground equipment repairs

Wants Security Vestibule

Uniqueness High Community Use- Church, WECMRD, Karate


Enrollment – 2014-2015 (439) 2015-2016 (418) 449 capacity. Staff- 1, 2, 47 Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues

Parking can be congestive with lots of traffic. Many comments in regards to security.

Priorities Confirmed priorities. Perception of lack of Security big issue.

Brush Creek ElementaryFacility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year1 BCES EXT Heat Tape 2 1 OK ‐ Additional tape and Replace every 10 years, add controls 20161 BCES GRDS Playground Media 2 1 Add media, drainage issue 20161 BCES INT Custodial Equipment 2 2 replace every 10 years ‐ needs rotation 20161 BCES INT Interior Paint 2 2 Repaint every 15 years 20161 BCES INT Operable walls 2 2 1 at stage, 1 in upstairs special needs ‐ Rebuild 1 panel at stage 20161 BCES GRDS Fields 2 4 Amend Soils 20161 BCES EXT Parking Lot Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe 2016

1 BCES GRDS Asphalt 2 2 Raise asphalt by shed at kitchen area entry at masonry retainer wall to drain 2016

1 BCES EXT Exit Doors ‐ Heaving? 1 2heaving at playground asphalt at restroom, settling at hallway entry by kitchen 2016

1 BCES GRDS Sidewalks 2 2 Repair and Replace as needed 2016

1 BCES INTSecured Entrance/ All Doors Lockedat Main Entrance 1 1


1 BCES SYS Card Access System 1 1Add card access system to control five doors. Door detection system all doors. 2016

1 BCES IT Security Cameras 1 1 Front Entry and drop off coverage. 20161 BCES GRDS Playground Equipment 2 3 Evaluate equipment, add as needed, repairs 20161 BCES HVAC Upper Level 2 3 Upstairs classrooms and hallways hot 20161 BCES INT Stage 2 1 Stair repairs 20161 BCES SYS Fire Alarm System 2 1 Need firmware upgrade 20161 BCES INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 20161 BCES INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 BCES IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 2016

End Priority One

2 BCES HVAC Kitchen Heat 2 3 Install separate heating unit 20162 BCES IT Technology 3 2 Networking Cable Upgrade or Wireless upgrades 20182 BCES HVAC VFD 5 3 Install 5 on air handlers 20182 BCES INT Gym Floor 2 4 sand/refinish every 20 years 20202 BCES INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 20202 BCES INT HVAC 2 2 Improve Ventilation 2020

2 BCES MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year2 BCES KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 BCES INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 BCES INT Windows 5 2 install reflective film at south, east and west facing windows 20162 BCES EQUIP Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Reach In Replacement ‐ CFC, HCFS 2020

End Priority Two

3 BCES KITCH Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Equipment rotation every 10 years 20163 BCES INT Residential Appliances 2 3 replace every 10 years 20163 BCES GRDS Landscaping 1 and 5 4 Refurbish‐ Review Security Issues 20163 BCES KITCH Flooring 2 4 Replace epoxy flooring, install expansion joints in slabs 20163 BCES INT Restrooms 2 2 replace fixtures every 15 years 20183 BCES INT Window Coverings 2 2 Replace every 15 years 20183 BCES KITCH Cafeteria Tables 2 3 Replace every 15 years 20183 BCES INT Kitchen 2 1 caulk and seal 20203 BCES EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 caulk and seal all exterior doors and windows/replace sealants 20203 BCES INT Cabinetry 2 2 Repair hinges/handles every 15 years 20203 BCES INT Operable Walls 2 2 re‐vinyl and refurbish operable walls 20223 BCES INT Doors 2 2 Replace Panic hardware, door closures, sweeps every 20 years 20223 BCES EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 replace/reseal at masonry, metal panels, etc 20203 BCES EXT Windows 2 2 replace fogged windows 2020

3 BCES EXT Roof Drains 2 1Bury roof drain by kitchen area entryAddress drains at North side ‐ playground 2022

3 BCES INT Stage Curtains 2 4 Re apply fireproofing every 20 years 2022

3 BCES GRDS Fields 2 2Relocate the softball field for parking addition coordinate with parking redesign 2022

3 BCES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 2 3 Add to JCI Controls 20223 BCES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 3 Change out Parking Lot lighting to LED ‐ cost savings (energy/mtce) 20223 BCES GRDS Site 1 3 Add asphalt entry to green house ‐ redo irrigation 20223 BCES INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20233 BCES INT HVAC 5 2 Radiant Heaters in gym 20233 BCES KITCH Ice Makers 5 2 Optimize Ice Makers‐ Heat Exchangers 20233 BCES EVAC Equipment 2 2 Replace Aging Equipment 20233 BCES INT Acoustical Ceiling 2 3 Partial Replacement every 20 years 2022






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year3 BCES GRDS Irrigation Systems 5 4 Install wireless controls district wide 2022

End Priority Three

4 BCES EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 20234 BCES EXT Roof 2 2 Replace roof at 30 years 2030

End Priority Four

Eagle County Charter Academy Eagle County Charter Academy Principal: Kim Walters Mascot: Hawks Colors: Red and Black

Square Footage: 45,000 Site Acreage: 6 acres. Built: 2012 Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 480, Stressed 600) Enrollment 2015/2016: 346 Replacement Cost: $18 Million Facility Assessment/ Capital Improvements None. Level of Need: Good Recommendations: No Work Planned.

School Mission Mission The Eagle County Charter Academy community creates lifelong learners and productive global citizens through a challenging college preparatory curriculum and character education. We accomplish this through an empowered staff, parental involvement and small class size. Vision The Eagle County Charter Academy will be the premier school in educating students for the future demands of our changing world. Values Children First, High Standards, Community, Effective Communication, Innovation and Creativity, Hawk Traits School Community- Specific, partnerships None. (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) None. Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships First Eagle County Charter School. Utilization No issues. Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology No issues. Safety No issues. Codes No issues. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues.

Eagle County Charter Academy Facility Evaluation Page - 2

Programs Delivered in Facility State Programs. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis No study. SF Analysis No deficiencies. Site Evaluations Operating as designed and functioning well. Summary of Principal Interview: Since building is a new building the needs a very few. ECCA is also very lucky to have a operating budget which has been able to handle any maintenance issues or needs as they arise. Building Issues High Priority Issues

None. Medium Priority Issues

None. Low Priority Issues

None Wants

None. Uniqueness

Charter School Utilization

No issues. Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues

No comments. Priorities

No comments.

No Facility Needs List to follow.

Eagle Valley Elementary Eagle Valley Elementary Principal: Tiffany Dougherty Mascot: Eagles Colors: Green and White

Square Footage: 47,739 Site Acreage: part of 23.3 acres. Built: 1973 Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 409, Stressed 430) w/o pk Current Enrollment 2014/2015: 335 w/pk Future Enrollment 2015/2016: 346/ 378 w/pk 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 309 2020 Projected Enrollments- 481, 481, 493 2023 Projected Enrollments- 525, 537, 555 * Projected Enrollments are with out Pre-K. Staff and Teacher Size: 50 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 117 S.F.)

Replacement Cost: $19 Million as designed, $28 Million new program. Cost of return: 38.6% of Replacement Cost Level of Need: Poor New Construction: $29,750,000 Recommendation: Replace School with Increased Capacity. Facility Needs - Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life

Secured Entries, Door Access Systems, Cameras Building Ventilation Renovation/ Expansion



Equity LCD Projectors in Classrooms Furniture Replacements Capacity Issues Programming Future Needs

Community Site Circulation – Parent Drop Off/ Pick Up

Environmental Sustainability HVAC Upgrade Lighting Upgrades Renewable Energy

* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. School Mission International Baccalaureate World School Eagle Valley Elementary School became fully authorized to offer the International Baccalaureate (IB) Primary Years Program (PYP) in January 2011. The PYP at Eagle Valley is offered in a dual language setting. Mission At Eagle Valley Elementary School, we are educating every student for success by developing inquisitive, informed and compassionate citizens. We strive to ensure that students become independent thinkers, problem-solvers, life-long learners and responsible members of an intercultural society. What is the Primary Years Program?

Eagle Valley Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 2

The IB Primary Years Program (PYP) is a curriculum framework focused on the development of the whole child as an inquirer, both in the classroom and in the world outside. It is defined by six transdisciplinary themes of global significance, explored using knowledge and skills derived from six subject areas, with a powerful emphasis on inquiry-based learning. An aim of the PYP is to create a transdisciplinary curriculum that is engaging, relevant, challenging and significant for learners in the 3-12 age range. (from www.ibo.org) The IB Primary Years Program at Eagle Valley

addresses learners’ academic and artistic development and their physical, social and emotional well-being

develops learners’ communication skills in more than one language respects and appreciates students cultural and linguistic diversity encourages learners to develop independence and take

responsibility for their own learning supports learners’ efforts to gain understanding of the world and to

function comfortably within it helps learners establish personal values as a foundation upon which

international-mindedness will develop and flourish encourages a positive attitude to learning by engaging students in

inquiries and developing their awareness of the process of learning so that they become lifelong learners.

integrates subject specific knowledge and skills within the study of universal themes and concepts

reflects real life by encouraging learning beyond traditional subjects with meaningful, in-depth inquiries into real issues.

encourages a growth mindset through reflection and goal setting develops an awareness of local and global issues and the

understanding that their actions make a difference in their own and others’ lives

School Community- Specific, partnerships Eagle, Colorado. (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Section is progress. Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships Long standing Eagle community school. Culture Issue- EVES has 55% of the students on free lunch program versus BCES 7%. When students mix at EVMS there can be a cultural breakdown. Mix sooner. Maybe split BCES and EVES with similar to PK-2, 3-5 grades.

Utilization Shared Pirate Gym. Over used space hard to schedule with EVMS. EVES gym does not get used as a gym. Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: More to follow Educational Technology: Upgrade of wiring. Safety Current entry is uncontrolled with main office across from entry. Would require a redesign and relocation of front office to closer to entry. Card Access- Due to high public use card access could be used to limit keys distributed for Public use. Easier control of exterior doors. Indoor lighting levels in entry, too low. Quantity of exterior doors. Double swinging interior classroom doors. Codes Accessibility items need to be addressed as well as code issues for current codes. Environmental, Indoor air-quality Very high mechanical air noise. Effects teaching and office personnel. Plumbing issues, smells. Programs Delivered in Facility Dual Language Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System


Variable Speed HW Pumps Destratification Replace aging HVAC Systems Install new high efficiency water fixtures Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Install controls for Heat Tape Replace/ renovate Windows (Partial) Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize Ice Maker Install air curtain for kitchen door

Utilities Annual Cost - Cost per Square Foot –



4% of Replacement Cost – existing building - $1,120,000 $23.46 per SF

1% of Replacement Cost – New Building - $280,000 $4.00 per SF

SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; Operating below capacity. District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations District Summary of Major Deficiencies Existing asphalt and concrete walks need repairs. Playground upgrades needed. Site vehicle circulation issues with EVMS, parents and buses. General Observations

Although the school is operating below capacity many issues noted above and below could compromise the learning atmosphere.

The school was designed in a pod layout which actually works well

with the dual language programing due to the students switching classes often.

Security and Safety present difficult challenges for “fixes”. Room sizes, need equality. Significant mechanical issues. 42 years of age. Can continue to operate at a high annual cost and

at a cost to Educational growth and culture (see performance levels which could be increased with new educational and design ideas) break out spaces, daylighting.


Air Flow!!! High volume of air makes distribution loud and disruptive.

Safety – Quantity of exterior doors. Plumbing issues. Security Vestibule. Key Pads. Cameras. Security system which detects open doors.

Medium Priority Issues Double swinging doors in pods. Safety and sound issues. Playground – outdated and unsafe. (Going after GOCO grant.)

Low Priority Issues Issues with common usage of gym. Traffic flow, buses and drop off mixed. Lighting in main entry is low at night.

Wants Tackable wall surfaces. Common Space for gathering. Assembly Space. Like current cubbies setup but could be in back of classroom

pods. Room sizes that are comparable- current inequality creates

issues when switching classrooms between English and Spanish. Appears as unequal to students.

Current work rooms not utilized. Need special needs room that is not shared access corridor. Like classroom layout in south wing with shared space between

and hallway connection for flow. Rooms by themselves are not useful.


Cafeteria Gym is typically always opens and do not use partition often. Gym does not get used as gym.

Adult Restrooms at other end of building. Culture Issue- EVES has 55% of the students on free lunch

program versus BCES 7%. When students mix at EVMS there can be a cultural breakdown. Mix sooner. Maybe split BCES and EVES with similar to PK-2, 3-5 grades.

Uniqueness International Baccalaureate Program- Students are grouped and

regrouped throughout day. Large and small groups with 1-3 teachers. Spend little time at traditional desk and chair setup. So, current pod setup works fairly well for programing. Central media center with multiple entry points is best location for easy access as students need to visit throughout day.

Dual Language- Two teachers split 40 students which are taught in both English and Spanish. Half and Half. So, students move from one classroom to the next. Again pod layout is great.

Utilization High use of shared gym. Media center high use. Perfect location centered in school.

Enrollment – 2014-2015 (335 w/pk) 2015-2016 (355 w/pk) 409 capacity. Staff- 25 Certified, 50 total.


Support of new building to replace existing. Cost to renovate to high.

Questioned kitchen equipment replacement if no cooking occurs at school.

Priorities Confirmed priorities. Exterior site Circulation major issue. Few dots for renewable energy. Library renovation (loft removal) removed from list.

Eagle Valley ElementaryFacility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year1 EVES GRDS Playground Media 2 1 Add media (GOCO grant) 20161 EVES GRDS Playground Equipment 2 2 Replace 15‐20 Yr Old Playground Equipment (GOCO grant) 20161 EVES INT Lighting ‐ Interior 2 1 T12. Upgrade lighting through out building. 20161 EVES GRDS Sidewalks 2 2 Repair and Replace as needed 20161 EVES EXT Parking Lot Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe 20161 EVES INT Asbestos 1 1 Total mitigation at renovation 20231 EVES INT Classrooms 2 2 Redesign all open classrooms/reduce airhandler noise, heat issues 20231 EVES INT Gym 2 2 Refurbish at renovation 20231 EVES INT Learning Walls 2 2 Address room use at renovation 20231 EVES INT Night Lighting 1 2 Upgrade at renovation‐ Security Issues. 2023

1 EVES INTSecured Entrance/ All Doors Lockedat Main Entrance 1 2 Standardize Entry Camera System with district. 2023

1 BCES SYS Card Access System 1 1Add card access system to control five doors. Door detection system all doors. 2016

1 BCES IT Security Cameras 1 1 Front Entry and drop off coverage. 20161 EVES INT Stage Curtains 1 2 Refireproof every 20 years 20201 EVES IT Computer Rooms 3 2 OK. Upgrade at renovation 20201 EVES IT Conditioned MDF Rooms 2 2 Provide cooling. 20201 EVES KITCH Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Equipment rotation. New hood needed 2020

1 EVES GRDS Bus/Parent Drop Off Circulation 4 3

Redesign parking area / circulation to accommodate district vehicle parking. Combined with EVMS.Separate parent/bus drop off. Separate bus barn parking entrance 2020

1 EVES INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 20181 BCES INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20164 EVES INT ADA Compliance 3 1 Bring into ADA compliance at renovation 20231 BCES IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 2016

End Priority One

2 EVES INT Kitchen 2 1 caulk and seal 20162 EVES GRDS Snow Removal Equipment 2 2 Need snow tractor and shed 20162 EVES GRDS Fields 2 4 Amend soils and reseed 20162 EVES EXT Exterior Façade 2 3 caulk and seal all exterior doors and windows/replace sealants 20162 EVES EQUIP Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Reach In Replacement ‐ CFC, HCFS 20182 EVES EXT Heat Tape 2 2 Replace every 10 years 2020






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year2 EVES INT Acoustical Ceiling 2 2 Partial Replacement every 20 years. Replace at renovation. 20202 EVES INT Carpet 2 2 Replace every 30 years 20202 EVES INT Drinking Fountains 2 2 Install additional fountains at renovation 20202 EVES INT FF&E 2 2 Replace every 25 years. Replace Classroom Furniture. 20202 EVES INT Flooring 1 2 Replace all flooring at renovation (asbestos) 20202 EVES INT Interior Paint 2 2 Repaint every 15 years 20202 EVES INT Operable walls 3 2 Eliminate at renovation‐ Confirm with Design Group. 20202 EVES IT Technology 3 2 Networking Cable Upgrade or Wireless upgrades 20202 EVES INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 2020

2 EVES MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 EVES KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 EVES INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 EVES INT Windows 5 2 install reflective film at south, east and west facing windows 20232 EVES KITCH Grease Trap 2 2 Redesign and install new grease trap 2020

End Priority Two

3 EVES INT Custodial Equipment 2 2 Replace every 10 years ‐ needs rotation 20163 EVES KITCH Cafeteria Tables 2 3 Replace every 15 years 20163 EVES INT Scoreboard 4 3 Replace in Eagle Gym 20163 EVES EXT Windows 2 3 replace fogged windows 20163 EVES EXT Roof Drains 2 1 Redesign and replace 20223 EVES GRDS Trash/Recycle 2 1 Redesign dock area, install electronic gate 20223 EVES HVAC VFD 5 1 Redesign based on renovation 20223 EVES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 2 2 Put on JCI controls 20223 EVES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 2 Need upgrade all 20223 EVES EXT Parking Lot 5 2 Replace Parking lot pole lights w/LED 20223 EVES EXT Windows 5 2 Replace at renovation 20223 EVES INT Cabinetry 2 2 Partial ‐ Replace every 30 Years 20223 EVES INT Doors 2 2 Replace '73 doors at renovation 20223 EVES INT Residential Appliances 2 2 Replace every 10 years. Replace at renovation 20223 EVES INT Restrooms 2 2 Replace fixtures every 15 years. Replace at renovation 20223 EVES INT Tile 2 2 Replace every 30 years 2022






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year3 EVES INT Window Coverings 2 2 Replace every 15 years 20223 EVES KITCH Flooring 2 2 Tile. Replace at renovation 20223 EVES KITCH Serving Line 3 2 Redesign entire kitchen/serving line/cafeteria at renovation 20223 EVES EXT Exterior Façade 2 3 Clean brick, rework downspouts 20223 EVES GRDS Irrigation 2 4 Redesign around new parking area at SW corner of building 20223 EVES GRDS Irrigation Systems 5 4 Install wireless controls district wide 20223 EVES KITCH Ice Makers 5 2 Optimize Ice Makers‐ Heat Exchangers 20233 EVES GRDS Landscaping 1 and 5 4 Enhance existing landscaping‐ security issues. 2022

End Priority Three

4 EVES EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 20234 EVES SYS Fire Sprinkler 1 2 No. Add at renovation 20234 EVES INT Insulation 5 2 Reinsulate '73 portion of building, including piping 20234 EVES INT Signage 2 2 Replace every 30 years 20234 EVES EXT Signage 2 4 Install monument sign 2023

End Priority Four

Eagle Valley High Eagle Valley High Principal: Greg Doan Mascot: Devils Colors: Black and White w/ Red

Square Footage: 155,147 Site Acreage: 26.3 acres. Built: 1960’s, 1975, 2000, 2009 Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 968, Stressed 1139) Enrollment 2014/2015: 750 Enrollment 2015/2016: 818 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 920 2020 Projected Enrollments- 1125, 1137, 1161 2023 Projected Enrollments- 1250, 1286, 1338 Staff and Teacher Size: 60 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 160 S.F.) Replacement Cost: $62 Million as designed.

Cost of return: 29.5% of Replacement Cost Level of Need: Fair Recommendations: Priorities 1- 4 Addition(s) to address future capacity concerns. Facility Needs - Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life




Equity LCD Projectors in Classrooms Furniture Replacements Capacity Issues Locker Room Upgrades

Community New Practice Field Stadium Upgrades – Football and Baseball


* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. School Mission Eagle Valley High School is a 4-year comprehensive high school accredited with distinction by the Colorado Department of Education. It holds membership in the Colorado Council of High School/College Relations. Students experience challenging academics, a large variety of athletics, fun activities and social events, and a strong sense of community as an Eagle Valley Devil. With two former college mascots as Administrators, school spirit runs high and students strive to excel and represent their school with pride. With both academic and technical opportunities of enrichment, graduating Devils are prepared to follow their dreams to the college or technical school of their choice. Parents are welcome and active supporters of our school and their children, rounding out our full community of learners, parents and educators. School Community- Specific, partnerships Gypsum, Colorado. (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Section is progress.

Eagle Valley High Facility Evaluation Page - 2

Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships Long standing Eagle community school. Culture Issue- EVES has 55% of the students on free lunch program versus BCES 7%. When students mix at EVMS there can be a cultural breakdown. Mix sooner. Maybe split BCES and EVES with similar to PK-2, 3-5 grades. Utilization Media Center- Convert to more of a technology center. What to do with computer labs which are not used extensively. Building is quickly approaching a capacity issue. Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: More to follow Educational Technology: Replace LCDs. Safety Access to Auto Shop uncontrolled. More interior cameras. Door security access system needed. Codes No issues. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Programs Delivered in Facility State Programs. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit

Optimize Control System Variable Speed HW Pumps Destratification Replace aging HVAC Systems Install radiant gas heaters in gym Install new high efficiency water fixtures Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Install controls for Heat Tape Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize Ice Maker

Utilities




2.5% of Replacement Cost - $1,550,000 After Renovations 1.25% - $775,000 $9.99 per SF and $4.99 per SF

SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; Operating below capacity. District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations Field upgrades desired. General Observations

Provide renovations of areas not touched in 2009 construction. Concern with capacity of building.

Eagle Valley High Facility Evaluation Page - 3


Face lift on untouched areas from last renovations. Media Center/ Technology overhaul Safety- Autoshop connection. Security Vestibule. Key Pads. Cameras. Security system which detects open doors.

Medium Priority Issues Issues on Maintenance Casework repairs in older sections. Window blinds and window operation.

Low Priority Issues What to do with Computer Labs

Wants Field Upgrades. Athletic facilities upgrade and expansion.

Uniqueness Multiple expansions since 60’s.

Utilization Fields highly used. Community use high.

Enrollment – 2014-2015 (750) 2015-2016 (775/800) 968 capacity.


Building deficiency issues: o Only 750 lockers, need more for capacity. o Lockerooms to small. o Replace PA in aux gym. o Auditorium upgrades for capacity, stage lighting fly system o Additional Science Rooms with capacity increase o Kitchen upgrades for Pro Start.

Priorities Confirmed.

Eagle Valley HighFacility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year1 EVHS INT Athletic Showers 3 1 Relocate shower heads per Accessibility Standards 20161 EVHS EXT Roof 2 1 Main Classroom wing replace roof‐ not 2000 portion 20161 EVHS INT Student Lockers 3 2 Locker replacement 20161 EVHS INT Drinking Fountains 2 3 Replace Classroom Wing Drinking Fountains 20161 EVHS GRDS Sidewalks 2 1 OK. Replace as needed 20161 EVHS GRDS Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe 20161 EVHS INT Autoshop 2 3 Replace ceiling tiles and flooring in autoshop classroom 20161 EVHS INT Flooring 2 1 Replace stair treads in classroom wing. 20161 EVHS INT Main Gym 2 2 Needs additional storage 20161 EVHS INT Interior Storage 2 2 Storage‐ Gym, Maintenance and Custodial 20161 EVHS INT Locker Room Lockers 2 2 New lockers in Varsity Locker Rooms 2016

1 EVHS INT Locker Rooms 3 2Renovate PE and Varsity locker rooms, Address accessibility issues. Insulation issues. 2016

1 EVHS EXT Field Equipment for Turf 2 2 Provide litter CAT and Turf Vac for synthetic tuf maintenance. 2016

1 EVHS INT Building 3 2 Renovate portions not touched in last renovations ‐ Classrooms, Restrooms. 20161 EVHS INT Media 3 4 Technology Renovation of Media, Tech Center 20161 EVHS EXT Exterior 1 2 Add Breezeway to Auto Stop, or address school hours entry. 2016

1 EVHS IT Secured Entry 1 1Secure door into main office with button lock release to keep door locked during school hours. 2016

1 EVHS IT Security Cameras 1 1Update software to be more user friendly. Add more cameras. Investigate ability for cameras to be operated by motion. 2016

1 EVHS IT Door Access System 1 1Provide and alter existing door access system and door detection system to see which doors are open. Tied to student ID cards? 2016

1 EVHS INT Casework 2 4 Casework repairs and replacement 20161 EVHS INT Window Blinds 2 2 Replace integral blinds with shades. 20161 EVHS INT Windows 2 2 Repair windows. Hard to operate. 20161 EVHS INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 20161 EVHS IT Paging Systems 2 2 Replace outdated Paging System Backboard 20161 EVHS INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 EVHS IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 20161 EVHS INT Capacity Issues 1 1 Need to determine scope‐ Hallways, Auditrium, Etc. 2016

End Priority One







2 EVHS INT Technology 3 2 Networking Cable Upgrade or Wireless upgrades 20232 EVHS EXT Fencing 1 2 Repair/replace chain link fence /GES 20161 EVHS INT Gym‐aux 4 4 Replace PA system. 20182 EVHS INT Carpet 2 1 Partial replacement every 30 years 20162 EVHS HVAC Boiler RM‐ NW 5 2 Install VFDS at New Boiler (classroom wing) 20162 EVHS INT Paint 2 2 Classrooms ‐ repaint 20162 EVHS IT LCD in all classrooms 4 2 Rework installation of LCDS 20162 EVHS INT Bleachers 2 2 Refurbish AUX Gym Bleachers 20172 EVHS INT Doors 2 2 Hardware, Door Closures at end of Life Cycle in older areas 20172 EVHS EXT Building 2 2 Caulk, Seal exterior. 20172 EVHS EQUIP Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Reach In Replacement ‐ CFC, HCFS 20182 EVHS INT GYM ‐ AUX 2 3 Refinish wood floor 20202 EVHS INT Fire Alarm 2 2 Replace fire alarm panel 20202 EVHS INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 20202 EVHS INT HVAC 2 2 Replace aging Equipment 2020

2 EVHS MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 EVHS KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 EVHS INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 EVHS INT Gym ‐ AUX 5 1 Replace Lighting with T8 20162 EVHS INT GYM ‐ AUX 2 4 Replace Ceiling 20162 EVHS EXT Windows 5 4 Replace windows at renovation 2023

End Priority Two

3 EVHS EXT Parking Lot 5 2 Replace Parking lot lights with LED 20163 EVHS EXT Heat Tape 2 2 Replace every 10 years 20173 EVHS INT Acoustical Ceiling 2 3 Partial Replacement every 20 years ‐ CLASSROOM WING 20173 EVHS GRDS Running Track 2 2 Repairs Maintenance‐ OK ‐ new in 2009 20223 EVHS INT Custodial Equipment 2 2 replace every 10 years 20223 EVHS KITCH Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Replace old kitchen equipment 20223 EVHS EXT Doors 2 2 Replace old doors & hardware (science wing, old dock entrance) 20223 EVHS EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 2 Put lighting on Douglas controls ‐ for cost savings 2022






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year3 EVHS GRDS Fields 2 2 recondition baseball field 20223 EVHS GRDS Stadium Bleachers 4 2 replace baseball bleachers 20223 EVHS INT Night Lights 5 2 Old lights needs to be put on Douglas controls 20223 EVHS EXT Exterior Façade 1 3 Need roof access at auto shop 20223 EVHS GRDS Fields 4 3 Add new practice field at Bindley site (GOCO grant application) 20223 EVHS GRDS Irrigation Systems 2 3 Replace controllers, district wide central system 20223 EVHS INT FF&E 2 3 Partial replace every 25 years. Rotation 20223 EVHS INT Residential Appliances 2 3 Replace every 10 years 20223 EVHS INT Scoreboards ‐ aux 2 3 Needs new scoreboards 2022

3 EVHS EXT Auto Shop 2 4 Add storage for parts, etc ‐ redesign auto shop building. Refinish Exterior. 20223 EVHS EXT Storage 4 4 Build new storage shed at baseball field (GOCO grant application) 20223 EVHS GRDS Fields 4 4 Refurbish batting cage 20223 EVHS GRDS Irrigation 2 4 Replace boulder diverter in ditch with weir gate 20223 EVHS INT Operable walls 3 4 Remove upstairs walls. 20223 EVHS INT Woodshop Equipment 1 4 Replace equipment with instant shut offs ‐ safety issue 20223 EVHS INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20233 EVHS INT HVAC 5 2 Radiant Heaters in Gyms 20233 EVHS KITCH Ice Makers 5 2 Optimize Ice Makers‐ Heat Exchangers 20233 EVHS GRDS Fields 2 4 Football Field Turf ‐ Repairs 2022

End Priority Three

4 EVHS INT Insulation 2 1 Classroom wing 2016

4 EVHS EXT Signage 2 4New monument sign ‐ upgrade to new district standard ‐ integrate reader board 2023

4 EVHS GRDS Fields 4 4 Add turf for baseball field 20234 EVHS EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2023

End Priority Four

Eagle Valley Middle Eagle Valley Middle Principal: Katie Jarnot Mascot: Pirates Colors: Black and Yellow

Square Footage: 82,000 Site Acreage: shared 23.3 acres. Built: 1980 Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 379, Stressed 446) Enrollment 2014/2015: 330 Enrollment 2015/2016: 352 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 430 2020 Projected Enrollments- 399, 405, 417 2023 Projected Enrollments- 455, 470, 494 Staff and Teacher Size: 37 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 216 S.F.) (Student Based – 196 S.F.) Replacement Cost: $32.9 Million as designed. New Replacement Cost: $35 Million

Cost of return: 43.7% of Replacement Cost Level of Need: Poor. Recommendation: Replace with new facility. Facility Needs - Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life

Secured Entries, Door Access Systems, Cameras Building Ventilation Renovation/ Expansion



Equity LCD Projectors in Classrooms Furniture Replacements Capacity Issues Programming Future Needs

Community Site Circulation – Parent Drop Off/ Pick Up


* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum Mission/ Goals Eagle Valley Middle School's mission is to educate and inspire life-long learners for academic and personal success. It is our vision that all school and community members will be involved in the process of educating students to achieve academic, emotional, social and physical success. At Eagle Valley Middle School we believe in ourselves, our school, and our community. We practice three simple rules: Be Respectful, Be Responsible and Be Positive and Productive. By following these tenants, students and teachers work together to create an environment that is conducive to learning and allows all students to grow and achieve. Middle school is a team sport, so we rely on the support of our students‚ families and encourage parents and guardians to have frequent and meaningful communication with the school. School Community- Specific, partnerships Located in Eagle. Only middle school in the mid valley area. “Need to provide what is best for children and not least expensive.”

Eagle Valley Middle Facility Evaluation Page - 2

(Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Section is progress. Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships Long standing Eagle community school. Love Art room, daylighting and size. Functions well. Utilization Corridors undersized. Shared Pirate Gym. Over used space hard to schedule with EVMS. 3 computer labs, one per grade. Conflicts during testing. Functions well for current programing. Office spaces needed. Community space needed. Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: More to follow Educational Technology: Replace LCDs. True media/ technology center- renovation. Safety Uncontrolled entry with no direct access with office across hall. Would be difficult and expensive to move office adjacent to entry. Number of entries into building. Card access security system. Cameras needed. Location of Nurses office in relationship to the main office. Cross traffic, emergency services access. Codes Accessibility issues and code issues. Environmental, Indoor air-quality Sewer smells when it rains. Gym roof leak. 8th grade fumes and smells. Ventilation issues from maintenance yard below.

Programs Delivered in Facility State Programs. Middle school that encompasses everything, Arts, language, VOtech, etc. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Variable Speed HW Pumps Destratification Replace aging HVAC Systems Install new high efficiency water fixtures Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Install controls for Heat Tape Replace/ renovate Windows (Partial) Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize Ice Maker Install air curtain for kitchen door

Utilities

Annual Cost - Cost per Square Foot –



3% of Replacement Cost – existing building - $960,000 $11.70 per SF


SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; Operating below capacity. Need more community space. Conference rooms, etc.

Eagle Valley Middle Facility Evaluation Page - 3

District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations Playfield upgrades. Site traffic circulation issues with buses, parents and children crossing. Asphalt and concrete repairs. More bike storage needed. General Observations

The school continues to function well in regards to classroom spaces.

Main corridor at main office crossroads is very congested during class changes to cafeteria, gym, art wood shop wings. Creates safety issues and issues with bullying.

Educational growth and culture (see performance levels which could be increased with new educational and design ideas) break out spaces, daylighting.


Hallway congestion. What is best for children! Not necessarily the least expensive. 8th Grade fumes and smells- Ventilation Sewer Smell in office went it rains Gym roof leak Security Vestibule. Key Pads. Cameras. Security system which detects open doors.

Medium Priority Issues Nurses office- Access to outside. Paramedics, Privacy from front

office. Conflicts with use of Gyms with EVES. Community Space Offices – Speech, wayfinders, caseworkers. Partition Walls – many in disrepair, would use more if they

worked. Like idea of expandable rooms. Need to be sound proof. Site- Separation of buses and vehicles. Bike Path. More bike storage.

Low Priority Issues Stage stair repairs

Playground equipment repairs Team meeting spaces True media/technology center Performing Arts Stage

Wants Educational growth and culture (see performance levels which

could be increased with new educational and design ideas) break out spaces, daylighting

Middle school that encompasses everything, Arts, language, VOtech, etc.

Uniqueness Functions well Love Art Room

Utilization 3 computer labs (one per grade) do see conflicts during testing.

Enrollment – 2014-2015 (330) 2015-2016 (340/350) 379 capacity. Staff- 37 Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues

No new issues. Many confirmations to build new school due to age, congestion,

furniture, and cost to renovate veruse replacement. Priorities

Appears to confirm priorities one and two as necessary items now.

Priority three issues which got attention: Football field bleachers, technology upgrades, lighting in big gym, renewable energy.

Eagle Valley MiddleFacility Needs List

Priority GP CategoryGuiding Principles Maint. Cat. Maintenance Category



Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year1 EVMS GRDS Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe 20161 EVMS GRDS Sidewalks 2 2 Misc Repairs (allot $5k every 3 years) 2016

1 EVMS INT Interior Paint 2 3Paint life expectancy 15 years. Repaint interior room walls, doors,door frames, window frames 2016

1 EVMS INT Exhaust Smells 1 1 Smell of Exhaust from maintenance yard. 20161 EVMS INT Sewer Smells 1 1 Sewer smells during rain storms 20161 EVMS INT Renovations 1 3 Nurses office location, community space, offices 20161 EVMS INT Restrooms 4 4 Install partitions at urinals in classroom wing 2016

1 EVMS INTSecured Entrance/ All Doors Lockedat Main Entrance 1 1 Standardize Entry Camera System with district. 2018

1 EVMS IT Security Cameras 2 3 Front Entry and drop off coverage. Additional Exterior Coverage. 2018

1 EVMS SYS Door Access System 2 3Add card access system to control six doors. Door detection system all doors. 2018

1 EVMS GRDS Bus/Parent Drop Off Circulation 4 4Redesign for separate lots busses and parents, Combine with EVES, bike storage 2020

1 EVMS INT Gym / Stage 4 4Replace sound system, renovate True Performing Arts Stage/ Area, replace curtain and wood flooring, lighting upgrades. 2020

1 EVMS IT Technology 3 2 Networking Cable Upgrade or Wireless upgrades 20201 EVMS INT Locker Room Lockers 2 4 Replace all lockers 20201 EVMS INT Locker Rooms 2 4 Complete renovation 20201 EVMS INT Student Lockers 2 3 Replace every 30 years 20201 EVMS KITCH Serving Line 2 3 Redesign/relocate? at renovation ‐ needs to be expanded 20201 EVMS INT Media Center 3 4 Media center conversion to more technology. 20201 EVMS INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 EVMS IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 20161 EVMS IT Paging Systems 2 2 Replace outdated Paging System Backboard 20221 EVMS INT ADA Compliance/ Redesign 3 4 building designed/built prior to ada requirements 20231 EVMS INT Asbestos 1 1 asbestos abatement at renovation 20231 EVMS INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 2020

End Priority One

2 EVMS EXT Playground 4 5 Redesign playground add additional features. Parklike. 20162 EVMS KITCH Kitchen 2 1 caulk and seal countertops 20162 EVMS EXT Windows 2 3 replace seals on doors and windows 20162 EVMS GRDS Playground Asphalt 2 2 OK ‐ added 4 years ago, seal coat with parking lot 2016





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year2 EVMS EXT Exterior Façade 2 3 caulk and seal building exterior 20182 EVMS EXT Windows 2 3 Replace fogged windows 20182 EVHS EQUIP Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Reach In Replacement ‐ CFC, HCFS 20182 EVMS EXT Roof Drains 2 1 bury the roof drain on the pirate gym 20222 EVMS GRDS Fields 2 1 recondition ‐ unsafe, uneven 20222 EVMS INT Bleachers 2 1 Refurbish at renovation (aux Gym) 20222 EVMS EXT Windows 5 2 replace windows 20222 EVMS INT Operable walls 2 2 Replace Operable walls 20222 EVMS IT Conditioned IDF Rooms 2 2 Install A/C in IDF 20222 EVMS IT Conditioned MDF Rooms 2 2 Install A/C in MDF 20222 EVMS KITCH Flooring 2 2 new epoxy on floor every 10 years ‐ at renovation 20222 EVMS EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 3 Redesign to current lighting standards/LED 20222 EVMS HVAC Kitchen Heat 2 3 Redesign kitchen heating unit 20222 EVMS HVAC VFD 2 3 Add vfds for heating pumps, main air handlers for gyms 20222 EVMS INT FF&E 3 3 Replace every 25 years 20222 EVMS INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 2020

2 EVMS MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 EVMS KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 EVMS INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 EVMS INT Interior Storage 3 4 redesign for more custodial storage 2022

End Priority Two

3 EVMS EXT Roof 2 1 Replace roofing ‐ East Lower roof. 20163 EVMS EXT Roof 2 1 Replace Roofing ‐ West classrooms, Gym, Music, science wings' 20163 EVMS GRDS Snow Removal Equipment 2 2 Need tractor and shed 20163 EVMS INT Custodial Equipment 2 2 replace every 10 years. Need extractor, floor machine 20163 EVMS EXT Curb Appeal 4 4 remove / replace park benches 20163 EVMS INT Acoustical Ceiling 2 3 Partial Replacement every 20 years 20163 EVMS INT Carpet 2 3 Replace every 30 years 20163 EVMS GRDS Landscaping 2 4 Fertilize, re‐seed annually 20163 EVMS INT Emergency Gas Shut Offs 1 1 upgrade to code compliant keyed shut off system 20223 EVMS INT Gym ‐ Big Bleachers 2 1 Refurbished at 2008. Refurbish at renovation (Pirate Gym) 20223 EVMS INT Doors 2 2 Replace Panic hardware, door closures, sweeps every 20 years 2022





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year3 EVMS INT Lighting ‐ Interior 5 2 retro to T8 indirect lighting currently T12 20223 EVMS INT Restrooms 2 2 replace fixtures every 15 years 20223 EVMS INT Restrooms 2 2 Replace flooring 20223 EVMS INT Window Coverings 2 2 replace every 15 years 2022

3 EVMS EXT Exterior Façade 2 3facia / soffit repair, repaint all painted surfaces and doors. Done 2011. Repaint every 8‐10 years, brick tucking 2022

3 EVMS HVAC Woodshop 2 3 Needs make up air 20223 EVMS INT Cabinetry 2 3 Needs new cabinetry throughout 20223 EVMS INT Gym ‐ Big Floor 2 3 Refinish at renovation 20223 EVMS INT Gym ‐ Big Lighting 5 3 Replace lighting with automated lighting 20223 EVMS INT Gym ‐ Big Walls 2 3 Paint, joist, duct work and deck ‐ bright white 20223 EVMS INT Residential Appliances 2 3 replace every 10 years 20223 EVMS INT Scoreboards ‐ New 4 3 Original ‐ need replaced 15 years 20223 EVMS IT Computer Rooms 3 3 Need more outlets, needs A/C 20223 EVMS KITCH Cafeteria Tables 2 3 replace every 15 years 20223 EVMS GRDS Site 4 4 OK ‐ remove old pool building/ renovate storage 20223 EVMS GRDS Stadium Bleachers 3 4 Need bleachers for football 20223 EVMS GRDS Trash/Recycle 2 4 Redesign trash pick up area to south side of building 20223 EVMS KITCH Ice Makers 5 2 Optimize Ice Makers‐ Heat Exchangers 20233 EVMS INT Woodshop Equipment 2 4 Original equip ‐ replace at renovation 2022

End Priority Three

4 EVMS GRDS Running Track 3 4 Add running track 20234 EVMS INT Insulation 5 3 add R‐38 insulation 20234 EVMS EXT Signage 5 4 new exterior signage package 20234 EVMS SYS Fire Sprinkler 1 4 Partially sprinklered ‐ renovation 20234 EVMS EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2023

End Priority Four

Edwards Elementary Edwards Elementary Principal: Heide Hanssen Mascot: Wolves Colors: Silver and Black

Square Footage: 55,000 Site Acreage: 9.1 acres. Built: 1991 Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 459, Stressed 483) w/o pk Enrollment 2014/2015: 307 w/pk Enrollment 2015/2016: 303/ 317 w/pk 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 342 2020 Projected Enrollments- 227, 233, 233 2023 Projected Enrollments- 207, 213, 219 * Projected Enrollments are with out Pre-K. Staff and Teacher Size: 33 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 173 S.F.) Replacement Cost: $22 Million. Cost of return: 27.7% of Replacement Cost. Level of Need: Fair


Secured Entries, Door Access Systems, Cameras Replace playground equipment


Building Preservation Interior paint



* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. School Mission Mission: Valuing our differences Vision: Bilingual, Biliterate and Multicultural Students Edwards Elementary School - Colorado Governor's Distinguished Improvement Award Recipient 2012 and 2013 The Governor's Distinguished Improvement awards are given to schools that demonstrate exceptional student growth. On the school performance framework that is used by the state to evaluate schools, these schools 'exceed' expectations on the indicator related to longitudinal academic growth and 'meet or exceed' expectations on the indicator related to academic growth gaps. School Community- Specific, partnerships Located in Homestead in Edwards, Colorado. (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Section is progress. Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships Community school. In recent years before JCES was built it was operated at a stressed level. Utilization No issues.

Edwards Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 2

Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: More to follow Educational Technology: Upgrades. Safety Current entry is uncontrolled with main office across from entry. Card Access- Due to high public use card access could be used to limit keys distributed for Public use. Easier control of exterior doors. Codes Ramps do not meet ADA. Elevator is provided. Building is not fully sprinkled. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Programs Delivered in Facility Dual Language Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Destratification Replace aging HVAC Systems Install new high efficiency water fixtures Install Radiant Gas heaters in Gym Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Install controls for Heat Tape Replace/ renovate Windows Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize ice maker

Install air curtain for kitchen door Utilities



Acquire lifts for building. Recommended Cost per year and cost per SF to maintain each facility

2.5% of Replacement Cost - $550,000 $10.00 per SF

SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; Operating at 70% of capacity. Approaching capacity but Capacity study shows declining numbers. There is a small continued growth over the next 5 years but shows a decline after. District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations District Summary of Major Deficiencies Existing asphalt and concrete walks need repairs. General Observations

In general the building is functioning as designed. Major concern is secured entry. At 20 years of age many items are reaching there designed life span

and should be considered for replacement or part of a rotation schedule to be replaced within 5 years.


Secured Vestibule. Building renovation to move office to front entry. Prefers move in lieu of cameras. There are many times where attending a camera system would be difficult due to staff in front office and other duties.

Edwards Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 3

Wants School functions very well with no current issues.

Uniqueness Dual language program. Functioned better after JCES was built.


Enrollment – 2014-2015 (307) 2015-2016 (318) 450 capacity. Staff- 33 (3 Staff, 2 Custodial, 28 Teachers Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues

No new issues. Priorities

Playground equipment big issue. Need to move from Priority two to one. Codes issues.

Interior paint – move from three to one. Other confirmed.

Edwards ElementaryFacility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year1 EES GRDS Playground Media 2 1 Add media 2016

1 EES INTSecured Entrance/ All Doors Lockedat Main Entrance 1 1 Standardize Entry Camera System with district. 2016

1 EES IT Security Cameras 2 3 Front Entry and drop off coverage. Additional Exterior Coverage. 2018

1 EES SYS Door Access System 2 3Add card access system to control three doors. Door detection system all doors. Remove/ revise existing security system. 2018

1 EES GRDS Sidewalks 2 1 Replace as needed 20161 EES EXT Parking Lot Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe 20161 EES EXT Roof 2 2 Rework skylight penetrations 20161 EES GRDS Playground Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Restripe. 20161 EES INT Interior Paint 2 3 Repaint every 10 years 20161 EES GRDS Playground Equipment 1 3 Original. Needs to assessed 20202 EES IT Technology 3 2 Networking Cable Upgrade or Wireless upgrades 20201 EES EXT Doors 2 2 Refinish main entry doors 20161 EES INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 EES IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 20161 EES INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 2016

End Priority One

2 EES INT Operable walls 4 1 Refurbish/Remove where needed 20162 EES EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 Look at painted surfaces 20162 EES INT Custodial Equipment 2 2 Replace every 10 years ‐ needs rotation 20162 EES KITCH Flooring 2 2 Epoxy. Needs Repair 20162 EES GRDS Fields 2 4 Amend soils and reseed 20162 EES EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 caulk and seal all exterior doors and windows/replace sealants 20162 EES EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 replace/reseal at masonry, metal panels, etc 20162 EES EXT Windows 2 3 replace fogged windows 20162 EES INT Carpet 2 3 Replace every 30 years 20162 EES INT FF&E 2 3 Replace every 25 years. REPLACE CLASSROOM FURNITURE 20182 EES EQUIP Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Reach In Replacement ‐ CFC, HCFS 2018

2 EES GRDS Site 2 3 Redesign walk‐in cooler protection. Remove RR ties/gravel at old greenhouse 20202 EES GRDS Trash/Recycle 2 3 Redesign at renovation 20202 EES INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 2020






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year2 EES INT HVAC 2 2 Replace aging Equipment 2020

2 EES MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 EES KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 EES INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 EES KITCH Grease Trap 2 3 Redesign and install exterior new grease trap at renovation 20222 EES HVAC Kitchen Heat 2 3 Install separate kitchen heating unit 2020

End Priority Two

3 EES EXT Parking Lot 5 2 Replace Parking lot pole lights w/LED 20163 EES INT Kitchen 2 1 caulk and seal 20163 EES SYS Fire Alarm System 2 1 Original. Needs to be replaced 20163 EES KITCH Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Equipment rotation. 20163 EES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 3 Retrofit to LED 20163 EES GRDS Pump House 5 3 Add VFD 20163 EES KITCH Cafeteria Tables 2 3 Replace every 15 years 20163 EES KITCH POS Stations 2 4 Relocate POS in serving line 20163 EES HVAC VFD 5 3 Need 10 VFDs 20163 EES INT Window Coverings 2 2 Replace every 15 years . Replace at renovation 20163 EES INT Restrooms 2 2 Replace fixtures every 25 years. 20183 EES EXT Heat Tape 2 1 Replace every 10 years . Replaced 2009, add controls. 20213 EES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 2 Put on JCI controls 20223 EES EXT Roof 2 2 Replace roof at 20 years ‐ Check B&M roofing plan. 20223 EES INT Acoustical Ceiling 2 3 Partial Replacement every 20 years. Replace at renovation. 20223 EES INT Residential Appliances 2 3 Replace every 10 years. Replace at renovation 20223 EES GRDS Irrigation Systems 5 4 Install wireless controls district wide 20223 EES GRDS Landscaping 1 and 5 4 Enhance existing landscaping, security issues 20223 EES INT Interior Storage 3 4 Improve storage capability at renovation 20223 EES INT Tile 4 Replace every 30 years 20223 EES INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20233 EES INT HVAC 5 2 Radiant Heaters in Gyms 20233 EES INT HVAC 5 2 Install air curtain in kitchen. 20233 EES INT Equipment 2 2 Provide Lifts 2023






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action YearEnd Priority Three

4 EES INT Windows 5 2 install reflective film at south, east and west facing windows 20164 EES INT Insulation 5 3 Add insulation. Upgrade existing, closet by gym is very cold 20164 EES SYS Fire Sprinkler 1 3 Partially sprinklered. Install 20234 EES INT Signage 2 4 Replace every 30 years 20234 EES INT Cabinetry 2 4 Replace every 30 Years 20234 EES EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2023

End Priority Four

Gypsum Creek Middle Gypsum Creek Middle Principal: David Russell Mascot: Wolves Colors: Maroon and Silver

Square Footage: 81590 Site Acreage: 13.4 acres. Built: 2001 Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 464, Stressed 546) Enrollment 2014/2015: 368 Enrollment 2015/2016: 368 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 417 2020 Projected Enrollments- 420, 423, 435 2023 Projected Enrollments- 397, 412, 433 Staff and Teacher Size: 35 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 176 S.F.) Replacement Cost: $32.6 Million Cost of return: 15.8% of Replacement Cost Level of Need: Fair

Recommendations: Priorities 1 – 4 Add Gymnasium addition or expand seating. Facility Needs - Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life




Equity LCD Projectors in Classrooms Furniture Replacements Locker Room Upgrades

Community Playground Upgrades Environmental Sustainability HVAC Upgrade


* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. School Mission School Vision Our vision is to create and cultivate a welcoming, caring, safe, and rigorous culture of learning in which students develop high expectations of themselves as meaningful and productive members of our society. School Mission Our mission is to be Goal-oriented, Child-focused, Multi-faceted, and Safe and secure. Goal-Oriented: The GCMS community will increase academic achievement and growth through self-regulation, critical thinking and problem solving skills Child-Focused: All students‚ needs will be addressed in establishing and implementing school practices. Multifaceted: All students will increase proficiency in 21st Century skills, cultural awareness, physical education, research skills, study skills, visual arts, and performing arts. Safe, Secure, and Supported: The Gypsum Creek community will feel safe, secure, and supported at school and will contribute to that environment. The Gypsum Creek community will treat each other with respect and courtesy. To ensure a safe, secure, and supported environment we are implementing the world's foremost bullying prevention program, Olweus Bullying Prevention. School Community- Specific, partnerships Gypsum Colorado. (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Section is progress.

Gypsum Creek Middle Facility Evaluation Page - 2

Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships Newest down valley Middle school based on districts middle school proptype building. Utilization No issues. Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: More to follow Educational Technology: True media/ technology center- renovation. Need more power in classrooms. Safety Front entry lack secured vestibule. Need to consider how to deal with entry into Music room. Codes No issues. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Programs Delivered in Facility State Programs. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Variable Speed HW Pumps Destratification

Radiant Gas Heaters in Gym Install new high efficiency water fixtures Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Install controls for Heat Tape Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize Ice Maker Install air curtain for kitchen door

Utilities





SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; Functioning well within occupancy. District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations Playfield upgrades. Asphalt and concrete repairs. General Observations

The school continues to function well in regards to classroom spaces.

There are many “wants” related to building function and future programing.

Buildings are over ten years old and generally holding up well but need typical maintenance and start to consider rotation schedules for future items in 5 plus years.

Security Vestibule.

Gypsum Creek Middle Facility Evaluation Page - 3


Power for new technology boards in classrooms. Security Vestibule. (How to deal with music room entry.) Key Pads. Cameras. Security system which detects open doors.

Medium Priority Issues PE Storage room renovated so rubber flooring can easily be

added for exercise room. FFE rotation. Landscaping.

Low Priority Issues On going issues with partition wall in auditorium. Fence around fields to help control access from outside and

game tickets. Wants

Need to review computer labs and future needs. Larger auditorium. Larger seating capacity in Gym. Painting scheme on interior. Media Center (IQUAD) reconfiguration of media to technology

center. FFE and Power. Multi Media capacity with built in technology. Community space.

LCDS throughout school with information. Depending on location.

Wood shop and tech lab expansion of program (STEM) Mat hoists in gym. Playground upgrade.

Uniqueness Functions well


Enrollment – 2014-2015 (368) 2015-2016 (370) 464 capacity. Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues

Gymnasium expansion Woodshop remodel for stem

Priorities Confirmed. Some interest in renewable energy.

Gypsum Creek MiddleFacility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year1 GCMS IT Technology 3 2 Networking Cable Upgrade or Wireless upgrades 20161 GCMS GRDS Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe 20161 GCMS GRDS Sidewalks 2 2 Misc Repairs (allot $5k every 3 years) 20161 GCMS EXT Exit Doors 2 3 add structural slab at exits to prevent heaving 2016

1 GCMS INTSecured Entrance/ All Doors Lockedat Main Entrance 1 2 Standardize Entry Camera System with district. 2023

1 GCMS IT Security Cameras 1 3 Front Entry and drop off coverage. Additional Exterior Coverage. 2016

1 GCMS SYS Card Access System 1 3Add card access system to control four doors. Door detection system all doors. 2016

1 GCMS IT Media Center 3 4 Media center conversion to more technology. 20161 GCMS SYS Fire Alarm System 2 1 Need firmware upgrade 20161 GCMS INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 GCMS IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 20161 GCMS INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 2016

End Priority One

2 GCMS EXT Playground 4 5 Redesign playground add additional features. Parklike. 20162 GCMS INT Gymnasium 4 4 Seating Expansion 20162 GCMS KITCH Kitchen 2 1 caulk and seal countertops 20162 GCMS KITCH Equipment 2 1 Replace equipment‐ rotation 20162 GCMS GYM Storage 4 4 PE Storage ‐ replace flooring with rubber mats 20162 GCMS INT Gym Floor 2 4 sand/refinish every 20 years 20182 GCMS INT Stage 2 3 Continual maintenance to partition 20182 GCMS KITCH HVAC 2 2 Install independent heat in kitchen. 20182 GCMS EQUIP Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Reach In Replacement ‐ CFC, HCFS 20182 GCMS IT Technology 3 2 Networking Cable Upgrade or Wireless upgrades 20222 GCMS INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 2020

2 GCMS MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 GCMS HVAC Equipment 2 2 Replace aging equipment 20202 GCMS KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 GCMS EXT Windows 5 3 Add reflective film to windows 20202 GCMS INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 GCMS IT Paging Systems 2 2 Replace outdated Paging System Backboard 2016






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action YearEnd Priority Two

3 GCMS FFE Interior 2 4 Partial Replacement of FFE 20163 GCMS EXT Landscaping 2 4 Repairs, weeds, Wireless Central Control 20163 GCMS EXT Fence 1 5 Fence around fields to control access 20163 GCMS INT Woodshop 3 5 Expansion of Woodshop and tech lab program (STEM) 20163 GCMS INT Gym 3 5 Mat Hoist or Exterior Storage 20163 GCMS IT Technology 3 5 LCDS throughout school for informational presentations. 20163 GCMS EXT Louvres on Roof 2 1 Reflash louvres on the roof 2016

3 GCMS EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 2 Connect exterior lighting to JCI controls ($5,000) ‐ ENERGY EFFICIENCY 20163 GCMS INT Custodial Equipment 2 2 replace every 10 years 20163 GCMS INT Window Coverings 2 2 venetian blinds 20163 GCMS INT Residential Appliances 2 3 replace every 10 years 20163 GCMS EXT Roof Drains 2 2 Add Heat tape to roof drains 20163 GCMS EXT Roof Drains 2 4 roof drains are staining block 20163 GCMS HVAC HVAC 5 4 add VFDs to five major motors 20163 GCMS Site Site 2 4 Gravel the dirt path to the pump house 20163 GCMS EXT Parking Lot 5 2 Replace Parking lot lights with LED 20163 GCMS EXT Windows 2 2 replace seals on doors and windows 20163 GCMS EXT Windows 2 3 Replace fogged windows 2016

3 GCMS INT Interior Paint 2 3Paint life expectancy 15 years. Repaint walls, doors,door frames, window frames 2017

3 GCMS EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 caulk and seal building exterior 20183 GCMS KITCH Cafeteria Tables 2 3 replace every 15 years 20183 BCES INT Stage Curtains 2 4 Re apply fireproofing every 20 years 20223 GCMS INT Cabinetry 2 4 Misc. repairs 20223 GCMS EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 Paint. 20223 GCMS GRDS Snow Removal Equipment 2 2 Need tractor $12K, tractor storage $13k 20223 GCMS INT Doors 2 2 Replace Panic hardware every 20 years 20223 GCMS INT Restrooms 2 2 replace fixtures every 20 years 20223 GCMS KITCH Flooring 2 2 new epoxy on floor every 20 years 20223 GCMS INT Acoustical Ceiling 2 3 Partial Replacement 2022






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year3 GCMS EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 4 Replace light heads every 20 years 20223 GCMS INT Woodshop Equipment 1 4 Replace equipment with instant shut offs ‐ safety issue 20223 GCMS INT Mechanical 2 2 Replace gas fired Kitchen Make Up Air Unit 20223 GCMS INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20233 GCMS INT HVAC 5 2 Radiant Heaters in Gyms 20233 GCMS INT Equipment 2 2 Provide Lifts 2023

End Priority Three

4 GCMS EXT Roof 2 2 replace roof 20304 GCMS GRDS Running Track 3 4 Add track 20234 GCMS GRDS Site 1 3 Irrigation ditch on property needs to be piped 20234 GCMS INT Locker Room Lockers 2 3 Renovate every 20 years 20234 GCMS INT Student Lockers 2 3 Replace every 20 years 20234 GCMS EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2023

End Priority Four

Gypsum Elementary Gypsum Elementary Principal: Mitch Forsberg Mascot: Jets Colors: Blue and Yellow

Square Footage: 55000 Site Acreage: Part of 26.3 acres. Built: 1991 Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 444, Stressed 468) w/o pk Enrollment 2014/2015: 383 w/pk Enrollment 2015/2016: 326/ 394 w/pk 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 395 2020 Projected Enrollments- 266, 272, 272 2023 Projected Enrollments- 283, 283, 289 * Projected Enrollments are with out Pre-K. Staff and Teacher Size: 35 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 124 S.F.) Replacement Cost: $22 Million Cost of return: 24.1% of Replacement Cost Level of Need: Fair Recommendations: Priorities 1 – 4

Facility Needs - Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life

Secured Entries, Door Access Systems, Cameras Accessibility Compliance




Community New Playground. Environmental Sustainability HVAC Upgrade


* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. School Mission Gypsum Elementary is led by Mitch Forsberg, a Colorado National Distinguished Elementary School Principal of the Year award winner, and President-Elect of the Colorado Association of School Executives. Under Mitch's leadership, Gypsum Elementary has received the National Distinguished Title 1 School award for closing the achievement gap. Central to the school's philosophy is a strong emphasis on shared ownership of the educational experience of each student. The school culture is collaborative and student-focused, encouraging every student, teacher, and parent to take pride in the school and contribute to its ongoing improvement. Gypsum elementary has around 390 students in grades PK-5. During the 2013-14 school year, with support from school leadership, several Gypsum Elementary teachers took personal time to call on State Legislators at the Capitol to share specific experiences about how the reduced funding for public education is putting student learning at risk. This helped spark a grassroots movement in the community that resulted in an additional $110 million being allocated to the state's public education budget. School Community- Specific, partnerships Located in Gypsum. (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Section is progress.

Gypsum Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 2

Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships Built in 1991 as part of two new schools in Edwards and Gypsum. Both of which are prototype similar schools. Adjacent to EVHS. Utilization No issues. Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: More to follow Educational Technology: Infrastructure aging. Safety No secured entry. Codes Accessibility – Ramps to step and no elevator. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Programs Delivered in Facility State Programs. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Destratification Replace aging HVAC Systems Install new high efficiency water fixtures Install Radiant Gas heaters in Gym Upgrade domestic Hot Water System

Install controls for Heat Tape Replace/ renovate Windows Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize ice maker Install air curtain for kitchen door

Utilities




2.5% of Replacement Cost - $550,000 $10.00 per SF

SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; Operating within capacity studies. Operating at 89% of capacity in 2015-2016. District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations Update of playground needed. Code issues, surfacing. Asphalt and concrete repairs. General Observations

Appears to be operating as designed. Need secured entry. At 20 years of age many items are reaching there designed life span

and should be considered for replacement or part of a rotation schedule to be replaced within 5 years.


Gypsum Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 3

Secured Vestibule Medium Priority Issues

Playground Storage

Low Priority Issues

Wants

Secured Vestibule Uniqueness

Shares property with EVHS. Utilization

Operating as designed Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues

Pre-School Playground – Replace equipment- equipment is not appropriate for Pre-K, surfacing upgrade, heaving concrete creating tripping hazards.

Upgrade kitchen equipment with added breakfast program. Priorities

Playground should move to priority one. Others confirmed.

Gypsum ElementaryFacility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year1 GES INT Technology 3 2 Networking Cable Upgrade or Wireless upgrades 2016

1 GES INTSecured Entrance/ All Doors Lockedat Main Entrance 1 1


1 GES INT Card Access System 1 1Add card access system to control four doors. Door detection system all doors. 2016

1 GES INT Security Cameras 1 2 Front Entry and drop off coverage. 20161 GES EXT Exterior Façade 2 1 Brick OK, repaint painted surfaces asap 20161 GES GRDS Playground Media 2 1 Add media 20161 GES INT Cafeteria 2 1 Tile neeeds to be replaced 20161 GES EXT Roof 2 2 Rework skylight penetrations 20161 GES SYS Fire Alarm System 2 2 Original. Needs to be replaced 20161 GES INT Interior Paint 2 3 Repaint every 10 years 20161 GES GRDS Playground Equipment‐ Main 1 2 Original. Needs to be replaced 20161 GES GRDS Playground Equipment‐ Preschool 1 2 Original. Needs to be replaced 20161 GES EXT Concrete Repairs 2 2 Heaving concrete‐ including pre‐k area. 20161 GES EXT Parking Lot Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe 20161 GES INT Locker Rooms 4 4 Convert into storage rooms 20161 GES EXT Storage 4 4 Need additional storage 20161 GES INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 GES IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 2016

1 GES INT ADA Compliance 2 Ramps not compliant. No elevator. Add elevator? Address at renovation 20231 GES INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 2016

End Priority One

2 GES INT Kitchen 2 1 caulk and seal 20162 GES KITCH Flooring 2 1 Epoxy. Needs repair 20162 GES KITCH Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Equipment rotation. 20162 GES KITCH Cafeteria Tables 2 3 Replace every 15 years 20162 GES GRDS Fields 2 4 Amend soils and reseed. Infill as necessary 20162 GES KITCH POS Stations 3 4 Relocate POS in serving line 20162 GES INT Operable walls 4 1 Remove in preschool. Refurbish 20162 GES INT FF&E 3 4 Replace every 25 years. REPLACE CLASSROOM FURNITURE 20182 GCMS EQUIP Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Reach In Replacement ‐ CFC, HCFS 20182 GES INT Carpet 2 2 Replace every 30 years. Replace at renovation 20222 GES INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 2020






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year2 GES INT HVAC 2 2 Replace aging Equipment 2020

2 GES MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 GES KITCH Walk Ins 2 2Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant. Remount compressors off ground. 2020

2 GES INT Windows 2 install reflective film at south, east and west facing windows 20162 GES INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 GES INT Gym 2 2 Carpet. Replace at 30 year renovation 2022

End Priority Two

3 GES GRDS Snow Removal Equipment 2 1 Need snow tractor and shed 20163 GES INT Custodial Equipment 2 2 Replace every 10 years ‐ needs rotation 20163 GES INT Window Coverings 2 2 Replace every 15 years . Replace at renovation 20163 GES EXT Parking Lot 5 2 Replace Parking lot lights with LED 20163 GES IT LCD in all classrooms 3 2 Check IT wiring installation district wide 20163 GES HVAC VFD 5 3 Need 10 VFDs 20163 GES EXT Exterior Façade 2 3 caulk and seal all exterior doors and windows/replace sealants 20163 GES EXT Exterior Façade 2 3 replace/reseal at masonry, metal panels, etc 20163 GES EXT Windows 2 3 replace fogged windows 20163 GES INT Operable walls 2 2 re‐vinyl, refurbish 20183 GES INT Restrooms 2 3 Replace fixtures every 25 years. 20183 GES EXT Heat Tape 2 2 Replace every 10 years . Tape replaced 2010, add controls 2022

3 GES EXT Roof 2 1Replace roof at 20 years ‐ Check B&M roofing plan. Partial flat roof replaced 2008 2022

3 GES HVAC Kitchen Heat 2 1 Install separate kitchen heating unit 20223 GES KITCH Grease Trap 2 1 Redesign and install exterior new grease trap at renovation 20223 GES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 2 Put on JCI controls 2022

3 GES GRDS Site 2 2Redesign loading dock area at renovation / redesign trash recycle area. Truck turn around. 2022

3 GES INT Occupancy Sensors 5 2 Install sensors 20223 GES INT Acoustical Ceiling 2 3 Partial Replacement every 20 years. Replace at renovation. 20223 GES INT Cabinetry 2 3 Repairs every 30 Years 20223 GES INT Residential Appliances 2 3 Replace every 10 years. Replace at renovoation 20223 GES INT Tile 2 3 Replace every 30 years 2022






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year3 GES GRDS Irrigation Systems 5 4 Install wireless controls district wide 20223 GES GRDS Landscaping 2 4 Enhance existing landscaping. Remove cottonwoods, plant new 20223 GES INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20233 GES INT HVAC 5 2 Radiant Heaters in Gyms 20233 GES KITCH Ice Makers 5 2 Optimize Ice Makers‐ Heat Exchangers 20233 GES INT Equipment 2 2 Provide Lifts 2023

End Priority Three

4 GES INT Insulation 3 Add insulation in foyer areas. Upgrade existing 20164 GES SYS Fire Sprinkler 3 Partially sprinklered. Install 20234 GES EXT Signage 4 Install monument sign 20234 GES INT Signage 3 Replace every 30 years 20234 GES EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2023

End Priority Four

June Creek Elementary June Creek Elementary Principal: Erika Donahue Mascot: Cougars Colors: Plum and Black

Square Footage: 70000 Site Acreage: 9.8 acres. Built: 2008 Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 387, Stressed 408) w/o pk, infant Enrollment 2014/2015: 325 w/pk Enrollment 2015/2016: 294/ 324 w/ pk 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 329 2020 Projected Enrollments- 251, 251, 251 2023 Projected Enrollments- 241, 247, 247 * Projected Enrollments are without Pre-K. Staff and Teacher Size: 30 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 191 S.F.) Replacement Cost: $28 Million Cost of return: 3.4% of Replacement Cost Level of Need: Good Recommendations: Priorities 1 – 4

Facility Needs – Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life




Equity LCD Projectors in Classrooms Community Playground Enlargement Environmental Sustainability HVAC Upgrade


* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. School Mission June Creek develops caring, life-long learners who can think creatively and problem-solve in order to contribute to the greater good of the global community. The professional staff at June Creek is dedicated to: Inspiring students to learn through experience Utilizing instructional methods which support a variety of modalities Honoring diversity Ensuring the use of state-of-the-art technology Attending to individual student needs Maintaining high expectations for all learners Employing a rigorous and relevant curriculum As part of the June Creek family, you'll enjoy a learning community that encourages open communication, collaboration, and support among students, staff members, parents and community. School Community- Specific, partnerships Newest Elementary school in Miller Ranch. (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Section is progress. Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships In school child care. Utilization What happens to child care space if school nears capacity and needs the rooms? World Academy uses one room.

June Creek Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 2

Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: Expansion for additional wireless capacity. Educational Technology: No issues. Safety No issues. Codes No issues. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Programs Delivered in Facility State Programs. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Destratification Install new high efficiency water fixtures Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Install controls for Heat Tape Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize Ice Maker

Utilities



Replace equipment.


1% of Replacement Cost - $280,000 $4.00 per SF

SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; Operating within capacity. District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations Asphalt and Concrete repairs. Walkway from upper lot to school needs to be replaced. Double fall line creates hazard when icy. General Observations

Operating as designed. Discuss effects of shared spaces with Early Childhood and World

Academy when building enrolment increases. Summary of Principal Interview: Building Issues High Priority Issues

Walkway from upper parking to building. Double fall line slope creates accidents every year.

South door from Pre-K wing. Heaving of concrete create exiting issue.

Medium Priority Issues Technology- Adding computers to upper computer lab. Hardware

issue, power is already there. Expand Playground – 100+ children.

Low Priority Issues None.

Wants What happens when they need space used by Early Childhood

and World Academy? Uniqueness

World Academy uses one room. Early Childhood rooms.

June Creek Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 3


Enrollment – 2014-2015 (325) 2015-2016 (325) 387/456 capacity. Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues


Appears playground expansion should be moved to one. Others confirmed.

June Creek ElementaryFacility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year1 JCES GRDS Sidewalks 2 1 Replace walk from upper lot. Less slope and sideslope. 20161 JCES GRDS Fields 2 4 Amend soils and reseed 2014

1 JCES SYS Card Access System 1 1Additional doors (3) added. Add system to detect all doors ‐ opened or closed. 2015

1 JCES IT Security Cameras 1 3 Front Entry and drop off coverage. 20231 JCES GRDS Sidewalks 2 2 Replace as needed 20161 JCES EXT Parking Lot Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe 20141 JCES GRDS Playground Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Restripe. 20141 JCES GRDS Playground 4 5 Playground Expansion ‐ 100+ children 20161 JCES EXT Doors/ Concrete 2 1 South Pre‐K door, concrete heaves 20161 JCES INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 JCES IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 20161 JCES INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 2016

End Priority One

2 JCES INT Restrooms 2 2 High Efficient fixtures 20202 JCES INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 2020

2 JCES MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 JCES KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 JCES INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 JCES INT Windows 5 2 install reflective window film east facing classrooms 20192 JCES INT Kitchen 2 1 caulk and seal 2019

End Priority Two

3 JCES GRDS Asphalt 4 3 Add asphalt path at rear of building to playground 20143 JCES EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 caulk and seal all exterior doors and windows/replace sealants 20193 JCES EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 replace/reseal at masonry, metal panels, etc 20193 JCES EXT Windows 2 2 replace fogged windows 20193 JCES EXT Heat Tape 2 1 Replace every 10 years, add controls 20203 JCES INT Custodial Equipment 2 2 Replace every 10 years 20203 JCES INT Interior Paint 2 3 Repaint every 10 years 20203 JCES INT Residential Appliances 2 3 Replace every 10 years 20203 JCES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 3 Put on JCI controls ‐ wired for this already. Currently watt stopper 20223 JCES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 4 Retrofit to LED 2022

June Creek ElementaryFacility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year3 JCES GRDS Irrigation Systems 5 4 Install wireless controls district wide 20223 JCES INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20233 JCES KITCH Ice Makers 5 2 Optimize Ice Makers‐ Heat Exchangers 2023

End Priority Three

4 JCES EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2023End Priority Four

Homestake Peak Homestake Peak Principal: Bobby Young Mascot: Falcons Colors: Blue and Green

Square Footage: 122533 Site Acreage: 59.5 acres. Built: 1975, 1991, 2019 Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 653, Stressed 768) w/o pk Enrollment 2014/2015: 540 w/pk Enrollment 2015/2016: 522/ 547 w/pk 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- No projections. 2020 Projected Enrollments- 493, 502, 523 (Middle 285, 288, 297 / Elementary 208, 214, 226) 2023 Projected Enrollments- 427, 454, 487 (Middle 215, 224, 239 / Elementary 212, 230, 248) * Projected Enrollments are without Pre-K. Staff and Teacher Size: 60 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 180 S.F.)

Replacement Cost: $49 Million as designed. Cost of return: 13.7% of Replacement Cost Level of Need: Good. Recommendations: Priorities 1 – 4 Proposed Improvements - Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life



Building Preservation Accessibility Issue – at Lift, Ramp, Elevator Science Room Upgrades

Equity LCD Projectors in Classrooms Furniture Replacements Address Capacity Issues - Cafeteria Lockers Media Center Technology Upgrades

Community Auditorium Renovation Environmental Sustainability HVAC Upgrade


* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. Mission/ Goals Homestake Peak is an Expeditionary Learning Pre-K through 8th grade school where learning is active, challenging, meaningful, public, and collaborative. Our motto is: We are all crew! This speaks to our collaborative vision for learning; teachers, students, and parents, all working together as a synchronized crew to support students to achieve more than they think possible. We see our students as scientists, historians, writers, urban planners, activists; investigating real community problems with their peers to develop creative, actionable solutions. Making positive changes to real-world issues make the learning relevant and increases their motivation. Our students demonstrate their knowledge through presentations, exhibits, participating in critiques, and data analysis. Teachers, parents, and students see and have a shared understanding of their achievement! This fosters collaboration and improves work quality across the board, while building perseverance, excellence, accountability and kindness. Expeditionary Learning is a proven, research-based program that empowers young people with confidence and enthusiasm for learning and applying their knowledge to life. The hallmarks of an Expeditionary Learning school are:

Homestake Peak Facility Evaluation Page - 2

supportive, positive cultures; great teachers (trained in Expeditionary pedagogy) in every classroom; purpose-driven learning; and high expectations for all students. School Community- Specific, partnerships Highly regarded and popular school in Eagle-Vail. (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Section is progress. Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships First PreK-8 school in district. Moved into old High School site after renovation in 2009. Utilization High community use of gym and auditorium. Need better control and limitation of building space. Cafeteria highly used due to 2 hour serving time available for all students. Woodshop not used. Old Meadow Mountain site. Could be used for outdoor learning and activities. Need additional office space on upper levels. Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: Update in 2010. Wireless upgrades will be necessary. Educational Technology: LCD Projectors in all rooms. All capability to rooms via LCDS. Ability is present with current wiring. Needs hardware and final hookup. Safety Front entry needs additional buzz in entry to control door into office. Card access to help control extra community use. Expansive building with many doors. Need updated security system noting which doors are open. Codes Stairs from 100 to 200 level. Replace with ramp, elevator?

Still many Accessibility issues at doors into rooms. Full building is not sprinklered. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Programs Delivered in Facility Expeditionary Learning Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Destratification Replace aging HVAC Systems Install new high efficiency water fixtures Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Install controls for Heat Tape Replace/ renovate Windows Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize ice maker Install air curtain for kitchen door

Utilities

Annual Cost $143,663 Cost per Square Foot – $1.21




SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; Approaching capacity but Capacity study shows declining numbers. There is a small continued growth over the next 5 years but shows a decline after. (Two concerns – serving line, cafeteria and locker capacity.)

Homestake Peak Facility Evaluation Page - 3

District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations Playground needs additional retainage device at bottom of fencing to retain playground surfacing. What to do with Meadow Mountain site and East Bus Barn. General Observations

Operating within capacity but is nearing capacity in a few years. Concerns with cafeteria and serving line size as well as locker space.

High community use. Need to consider how this effects maintenance budget and safety.

What to do with Meadow Mountain site and East Bus Barn. Summary of Principal Interview: Building Issues High Priority Issues

Auditorium- Stage surface in poor condition, ADA upgrades (ramp, seating, headphones), Enlarge sound booth for sound board. Replace curtain bring tracks up to code.

Commons Lift- Replace with ramp, add elevator. Art Room- Storage Convert darkroom to storage. Carpet in work

room. Security system. Minimum at all doors to know if doors are open. Front entry door, buzz in system with camera. Door currently

stay open and unlocked. Building could be at capacity in 2016-2017.

Medium Priority Issues Additional lockers as capacity nears 650. Cafeteria serving issues as capacity nears 650. With two hour

window for serving it is difficult to serve students in time frame. Become extra difficult for children who are getting hot lunch since they spend half their time in the serving line.

Additional Office Space at commons level. More division of office space and flexibility.

Playground needs something at bottom of fencing to hold in media.

Large rocks around tree wells.

Wants All call system linked to LCDs in rooms. Ability to broadcast in

classrooms from central location. Smart boards in all rooms. Currently there unequitable of who

gets one and who does not. Currently has 1:4 computer ratio. When testing is occurring there

is no additional computers available for research during those times.

Uniqueness Very highly used for Community uses. Challenge occurs with

managing those uses after hours with current staff. Need separate manager. Many instances with doors and window remaining open after uses. Hard to control.

Utilization High- Community Use. High- Cafeteria Low- Wood Shop. Low- Site- Old Meadow Mountain site could be used more for

outdoor activities. Enrollment – 2014-2015 (540) 2015-2016 (580) 2016-2017 (650- at capacity) Staff- 60 (4 Staff, 2 Custodial, 40 Teachers, Approx. 20 volunteers. Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues

Media Center – Technology upgrades for 21st century. Separate K-5, 6-8 Playground space. Parking lot configuration – Painting, winter confusion. Ice Dams out of fire exits in winter.

Priorities Appears to confirm priority ones. Science room renovations

Homestake Peak PK-8Facility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year1 HPS IT Technology 3 2 Networking Cable Upgrade or Wireless upgrades 20161 HPS INT Storage 3 5 Convert Darkroom to storage, carpet in workroom 2016

1 HPS INTSecured Entrance/ All Doors Lockedat Main Entrance 1 1 Provide electronic lock at vestibule door. 2016

1 HPS SYS Card Access System 1 1Add card access system to control four doors. Door detection system all doors. Remove or revise existing security system. 2016

1 HPS SYS Security Cameras 1 2Front Entry and drop off coverage. Some exterior. Can existing system work, or new? 2016

1 HPS SYS Lockers 4 3 New Lockers as capacity nears 650 20171 HPS SYS Cafeteria 4 4 Serving line revisions as capacity nears 650. 2017

1 HPS IT Technology 3 4Provide final install of all call systems to classrooms, wiring in place need hardware. 2017

1 HPS INT Offices 4 4 Additional office space at commons level. 2017

1 HPS GRDS Playground Media 2 1New 2011. Review media yearly, Retaining board at bottom of fence. Large rocks removal. 2016

1 HPS EXT Parking Lot Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe (redesign pattern) 20161 HPS GRDS Sidewalks 2 2 Replace as needed 20161 HPS INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 20161 HPS EXT Exit Doors 1 1 Ice Damns at exit doors 20161 HPS EXT Roofing 2 2 Roofing Various sections and 400 wing 20181 HPS GRDS Running Track 2 4 OK. New in 2000. Resurface every 20 years (needs lanes striped asap) 20221 HPS INT Science Classrooms 4 2 Design 21st Century Science Rooms 20221 HPS INT ADA Compliance 4 3 Needs improvement. Expand 100/200 corridor, add ramp or elevator 20221 HPS INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 HPS IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 20161 HPS INT Auditorium 4 3 Needs renovation for lighting and sound booth, ramp, curtains. 2022

End Priority One

2 HPS INT Scoreboards ‐ main 2 1 Parts no longer available. System failing 20162 HPS IT Media Center 3 4 Media center conversion to more technology. 20162 HPS KITCH Grease Trap 2 2 Needs one Installed 20162 HPS GRDS Fields 2 4 Amend soils and reseed 20162 HPS INT Doors 2 3 Replace door hardware (not done in 2011 renovation) 2016






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year2 HPS EQUIP Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Reach In Replacement ‐ CFC, HCFS 20182 HPS INT Bleachers 2 2 Refurbish every 5 years 20182 HPS KITCH Kitchen 2 1 caulk and seal countertops 20222 HPS KITCH Kitchen 2 1 Equipment rotation. 2022

2 HPS MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 HPS KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 HPS EXT Windows 2 Add reflective film to windows 20162 HPS INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 2023

End Priority Two

3 HPS EXT Exterior Façade 2 4 Paint Exposed concrete at 200 level/fill "blockouts" 20163 HPS EXT Exterior Façade 2 3 apply new acrylic coatings (EIFIS) at gym and PE locker rooms 20163 HPS EXT Parking Lot 5 2 Replace Parking lot lights with LED 20163 HPS INT Flooring 2 4 Replace VCT flooring in science rooms 20163 HPS INT Cabinetry 2 4 Replace every 30 Years. Partial replacement in 5 years 20183 HPS INT FF&E 3 4 Replace every 25 years. Most new 2011. Partial replacement 20213 HPS EXT Heat Tape 2 1 OK ‐ Replace every 10 years, add controls 20223 HPS SYS Fire Alarm System 2 1 Fire alarm software upgrade every 20 years 20223 HPS EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 caulk and seal building exterior 20223 HPS EXT Windows 2 2 replace seals on doors and windows 20223 HPS EXT Windows 2 2 Replace fogged windows 20223 HPS EXT Windows 5 2 Replace 100 and 200 level windows, parts no longer available 20223 HPS INT Custodial Equipment 2 2 Replace every 10 years 20223 HPS INT Restrooms 2 2 Replace fixtures every 25 years. Varying ages of fixtures 20223 HPS EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 2 3 Put on JCI controls 20223 HPS EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 3 Retrofit to LED 20223 HPS EXT Scoreboards 2 3 Aux Gym ‐ Replace scoreboard in 10 years 20223 HPS GRDS Irrigation Systems 2 3 Install wireless controls district wide 20223 HPS INT Interior Paint 2 3 Repaint every 10 years 20223 HPS INT Residential Appliances 2 3 Replace every 10 years 20223 HPS GRDS Asphalt 2 4 Install asphalt from parking lot to east shed 20223 HPS GRDS Landscaping 4 4 add landscaping at bus barn and track area 2022






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year3 HPS GRDS Press Box 2 4 Repair Siding 20223 HPS GRDS Gym 2 4 Gym Lighting Replacements (Both) 20223 HPS GRDS Storage Buildings 4 4 Concessions stand needs heat and insulation 20223 HPS INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20233 HPS KITCH HVAC 5 2 Install air curtain 20233 HPS KITCH Ice Makers 5 2 Optimize Ice Makers‐ Heat Exchangers 20233 HPS INT Equipment 2 2 Provide Lifts 2023

End Priority Three

4 HPS SYS Fire Sprinkler 3 Partially sprinklered. Complete sprinklering 20234 HPS EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2023

End Priority Four

Red Canyon High - East Red Canyon High - East Principal: Wade Hill Mascot: Dragons Colors: Red and Black

Square Footage: 6850 Site Acreage: 16.7 acres. Part of Berry Creek Middle. Built: 2008 Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 83, Stressed 98) Enrollment 2014/2015: 100 Enrollment 2015/2016: 100 (100 East and 71 West) 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 92 Staff and Teacher Size: 12 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 61 S.F.) Replacement Cost: $2.75 Million Cost of return: 32.7% of Replacement Cost Level of Need: Poor Recommendations: Priorities 1- 4 Addition to address Capacity Issues. Increase to 120.

Facility Needs - Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life




Equity LCD Projectors in Classrooms Capacity Issues – Classrooms, Autoshop

Community Infant Care Facility Environmental Sustainability HVAC Upgrade


* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. Mission/ Goals Red Canyon High School is the alternative high school for Eagle County. It has two campuses, one in Edwards and one in Eagle. Both locations are Expeditionary Learning schools. Mission Statement Educating every student for success one student at a time. Red Canyon provides a safe "non-traditional" learning environment, where all students acquire the skills, knowledge, and behaviors necessary to be productive citizens in an ever-changing world. We will prepare students to: Be in charge of, and apply, their academic knowledge Set and achieve academic and personal goals Communicate effectively Respect and work cooperatively with others Think critically and be creative problem solvers School Community- Specific, partnerships Located in Miller Ranch. (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Section is progress. Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships Alternative High School.

Red Canyon High - East Facility Evaluation Page - 2

Utilization At Capacity. Computer room has been changed to classroom. Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: More to follow Educational Technology: Computer room has been revised to classroom. Safety Door access buzz in. Codes No issues. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Programs Delivered in Facility Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound School Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Destratification Insulate and seal building

Utilities



Replace equipment.

Recommended Cost per year and cost per SF to maintain each facility 1% of Replacement Cost – - $27,500 $4.01 per SF

SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; Operating at stressed level. Needs an addition. District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations Need additional parking. General Observations

Needs addition for additional classrooms. Wants to increase programing for shop and STEM related

programing. Summary of Principal Interview: Red Canyon East Building Issues High Priority Issues

Red Canyon West Medium Priority Issues

What happens when JCES meets capacity and they need to relocate the infant/ toddler nursery? Add addition to RCHS East for Infant and Toddler.

Building is at capacity. Future capacity needs for two more classrooms. Maybe second story over I/T addition.

Low Priority Issues More parking.

Wants Garage- Auto shop addition. Teachers lounge.

Uniqueness Proximity to bus route.

Utilization Fully utilized. Have converted computer room and kitchen to

classrooms.

Red Canyon High - East Facility Evaluation Page - 3

With 1:1 computers these changes are ok. Enrollment – East 2014-2015 (100), West 2014-2015 (85) Red Canyon West New building. Similar in design to West. Additional storage. Need for infant/ toddler possible. Future classroom addition. Vo Tech sharing with Eagle Valley? On campus. Continue to look at Autoplex building for site. Provide central location for students from Eagle and Gypsum which is about a 50-50 split. Right on bus route. Could provide VOtech options which are for the district not just EVHS or RCHS. Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues


Confirmed.

Red Canyon High - EastFacility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year1 RCHS‐E INT Classrooms 4 5 Building at Capacity‐ two additional classrooms, teachers lounge 20161 RCHS‐E EXT Parking 4 5 More Parking 20161 RCHS‐E EXT Parking Lot Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe 20161 RCHS‐E GRDS Sidewalks 2 1 Replace as needed 20161 RCHS‐E IT Security Cameras 1 2 Install interior/exterior. 2016

1 RCHS‐E SYS Card Access System 1 3Install card access‐1 door system with door detection at others. (Tied to Student ID) No buzz in system. 2016

1 RCHS‐E EXT Building 2 2 Insulate, caulk and seal exterior. 20161 RCHS‐E EXT Painting 2 2 Repaint Exterior 20161 RCHS‐E INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 RCHS‐E IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 20161 RCHS‐E IT Technology 3 2 Networking Cable Upgrade or Wireless upgrades 20181 RCHS‐E INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 2016

End Priority One

2 RCHS‐E INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 20202 RCHS‐E INT Restrooms 2 2 High Efficient fixtures 20202 RCHS‐E INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 RCHS‐E INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20232 RCHS‐E GRDS Trash/Recycle 4 4 OK ‐ Build enclosure for trash 2016

End Priority Two

3 RCHS‐E INT Custodial Equipment 2 1 Replace every 10 years 20163 RCHS‐E EXT Heat Tape 2 1 Replace every 10 years 20203 RCHS‐E HVAC Domestic Hot Water Heater 2 2 New in 2008 ‐ replace every 10 years 20203 RCHS‐E INT Interior Paint 2 3 Repaint every 10 years 20203 RCHS‐E INT Residential Appliances 2 3 Replace every 10 years 20203 RCHS‐E EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 3 Retrofit to LED 20223 RCHS‐E GRDS Irrigation Systems 5 3 Install wireless controls district wide 2022

End Priority Three

4 RCHS‐E EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2023End Priority Four

Red Canyon High – West Red Canyon High - West Principal: Wade Hill Mascot: Dragons Colors: Red and Black Proposed Square Footage: 11,000 Needed Minimum Site Acreage: 2.5 acres Capacity: (Square footage based: 70 Enrollment 2015/2016: 71 West Replacement Cost: $4,400,000 Recommendations: New structure on School District Property. Increase Capacity to 140. Mission/ Goals Red Canyon High School is the alternative high school for Eagle County. It has two campuses, one in Edwards and one in Eagle. Both locations are Expeditionary Learning schools. Mission Statement Educating every student for success one student at a time. Red Canyon provides a safe "non-traditional" learning environment, where all students acquire the skills, knowledge, and behaviors necessary to be productive citizens in an ever-changing world. We will prepare students to: Be in charge of, and apply, their academic knowledge Set and achieve academic and personal goals Communicate effectively Respect and work cooperatively with others Think critically and be creative problem solvers Summary of Principal Interview: Red Canyon West New building. Similar in design to West. Additional storage. Need for infant/ toddler possible. Future classroom addition. Vo Tech sharing with Eagle Valley? On campus. Continue to look at Autoplex building for site. Provide central location for students from Eagle and Gypsum which is about a 50-50 split. Right on bus route. Could provide VOtech options which are for the district not just EVHS or RCHS.

No Facility Needs List to follow:

Red Hill Elementary Red Hill Elementary Principal: Eric Olsen Mascot: Bear Cubs Colors: Red and Black

Square Footage: 62943 Site Acreage: 12.9 acres. Built: 2001 Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 425, Stressed 448) w/o pk Enrollment 2014/2015: 356 w/o pk Enrollment 2015/2016: 358/ 381 w/ pk 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 439 2020 Projected Enrollments- 424, 436, 460 2023 Projected Enrollments- 444, 474, 510 * Projected Enrollments are without Pre-K. Staff and Teacher Size: 30 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 148 S.F.) Replacement Cost: $25.1 Million Cost of return: 10.9% of Replacement Cost (Not Including PreK addition) Level of Need: Good

Recommendations: Priorities 1 – 4 Pre-K addition to address need for additional k-5 capacity. Complete Valley Road Improvements per Town of Gypsum Agreement. Facility Needs - Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life





Community Pre-School Addition. Environmental Sustainability HVAC Upgrade


* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. Mission/ Goals We instill a joy of learning through setting and achieving goals, growing from challenges, and celebrating successes. Students, staff, and families listen, encourage, and support one another to bring out our strengths. We celebrate our diverse and cohesive community that extends its support outside the walls of our school. Our students and families thrive because of our commitment to one another and the community around us We meet individual student needs through a variety of programs including Gifted and Talented, English as a Second Language, Special Education, Art, Counseling, Physical Education, Technology, Music, and Response to Intervention (RtI.) We cultivate respect. We purposefully recognize and celebrate respectful, responsible, and safe behaviors through our system of Positive Behavior Interventions and Support (PBIS.) Through direct instruction and modeling we teach that respect is a shared responsibility throughout the Red Hill community. We differentiate our instruction so that all students will master the Common Core State Standards. Our teachers and staff engage in professional development to continually improve teaching and learning in our classes. We emphasize literacy as the foundation from which students start their own successful educational journey.

Red Hill Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 2

Our teachers and staff engage in professional development to continually improve teaching and learning in our classes We celebrate our diverse and cohesive community that extends its supports outside the walls of our school. Our students and families thrive because of our commitment to one another and the community around us. We believe in providing as many opportunities as possible for students to shine. We incorporate programs beyond the curriculum that encourage the whole child to grow and thrive. School Community- Specific, partnerships Located in Gypsum. (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Youth Foundation TLC After School Program WECMRD Ute Springs Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships Built in 2001 in the Gypsum Creek Valley. Utilization Operating under capacity. Modulars are not used. Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: More to follow Educational Technology: No issues. Safety Provide secured vestibule. Card Access needed. Codes No issues.

Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Programs Delivered in Facility State Programs. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Variable Speed HW Pumps Destratification Radiant Gas Heaters in Gym Install new high efficiency water fixtures Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Install controls for Heat Tape Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize Ice Maker Install air curtain for kitchen door

Utilities





SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; Operating as designed.

Red Hill Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 3

District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations Asphalt and concrete repairs. General Observations

Operating as designed. Discuss need for Pre-K addition. Discuss future of modulars.


Security Vestibule Key Card Entry Asphalt Repairs

Medium Priority Issues Fields Crosswalk at new Pre-K drop off.

Low Priority Issues Pre-K landscaping.

Wants Safety issues.

Uniqueness PreK in Kindergarten room.

Utilization Modulars are not being used.

Enrollment – 2014-2015 (356) 2015-2016 (366) 425 capacity. Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues


Confirmed priorities.

Red Hill ElementaryFacility Needs List






1 RHES INTSecured Entrance/ All Doors Lockedat Main Entrance 1 1


1 RHES SYS Card Access System 1 1Add card access system to control five doors. Door detection system all doors. 2016

1 RHES IT Security Cameras 1 1 Front Entry and drop off coverage. 20161 RHES SYS Fire Alarm System 2 1 Need firmware upgrade 20161 RHES GRDS Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe 20151 RHES GRDS Playground Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, restripe 20151 RHES GRDS Sidewalks 2 2 Misc Repairs (allot $5k every 3 years) 20151 RHES GRDS Pre‐K 2 1 Crosswalk at Pre‐K Entry 20161 RHES GRDS Pre‐K 4 5 Landscaping around pre‐k playground 20161 RHES GRDS Fields 2 1 Baseball field has sunk 12" 20141 RHES GRDS Playground Media 2 1 Needs fill ‐ review annually for Health Dept Inspection 20141 RHES INT Technology 3 2 Networking Cable Upgrade or Wireless upgrades 20181 RHES INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 RHES IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 20161 RHES INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 2018

End Priority One

2 RHES HVAC Kitchen Heat 2 2 Needs kitchen heating unit 20162 RHES GRDS Delivery Area 2 1 Add additional turnaroudn area at trash and delivery area. 20162 RHES EQUIP Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Reach In Replacement ‐ CFC, HCFS 20182 RHES INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 2020

2 RHES MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 RHES EVAC Equipment 2 2 Replace Aging Equipment 20202 RHES KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 RHES INT Windows 5 2 install reflective film at south, east and west facing windows 20142 RHES INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 RHES INT Gym Floor 2 4 sand/refinish every 20 years 2020

End Priority Two

3 RHES INT Stage Curtains 2 4 Re apply fireproofing every 20 years 20223 RHES GRDS Snow Removal Equipment 2 1 Need tractor and shed 20143 RHES KITCH Flooring 2 1 new epoxy on floor every 10 years 2014

Red Hill ElementaryFacility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year3 RHES KITCH Kitchen 2 1 Equipment rotation. 20143 RHES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 2 Connect exterior lighting to JCI controls ($5,000) 20143 RHES INT Custodial Equipment 2 2 replace every 10 years 20143 RHES HVAC VFD 5 3 5 Motors ‐ 2 New in 2011, 3 need VFDs for roof top units, plus 20143 RHES INT Residential Appliances 2 3 replace every 10 years 20143 RHES EXT Roof Drains 2 2 Replace Heat tape to roof drains, add controls 20143 RHES EXT Roof Drains 2 4 Roof drains are staining block 20143 RHES GRDS Landscaping 2 4 OK ‐ fertilize, re‐seed annually. Infill as necessary 20143 RHES INT Kitchen 2 1 caulk and seal 20163 RHES EXT Windows 2 2 replace fogged windows 20163 RHES EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 caulk and seal all exterior doors and windows/replace sealants 20183 RHES EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 replace/reseal at masonry, metal panels, etc 20183 RHES INT Cabinetry 2 2 Repair hinges/handles every 15 years 20183 RHES INT Window Coverings 2 2 replace every 15 years 2018

3 RHES INT Interior Paint 2 3Paint life expectancy 15 years. Repaint walls, doors,door frames, window frames 2018

3 RHES INT Restrooms 2 3 replace fixtures every 15 years, high efficiency 20183 RHES KITCH Cafeteria Tables 2 3 replace every 15 years 20183 RHES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 2 Replace light heads every 20 years‐ LED 20223 RHES INT Operable Walls 2 2 re‐vinyl and refurbish operable walls 20223 RHES INT Doors 2 2 Replace Panic hardware, door closures, sweeps every 20 years 20223 RHES EXT Mechanical 2 4 New Hot Water ‐ High Efficiency 20223 RHES INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20233 RHES INT HVAC 5 2 Radiant Heaters in gym 20233 RHES KITCH Ice Makers 5 2 Optimize Ice Makers‐ Heat Exchangers 20233 RHES INT Equipment 2 2 Provide Lifts 2023

End Priority Three

4 RHES INT Roof 2 1 Roof life cycle ‐ 20 Years 20304 RHES INT Acoustical Ceiling 2 3 Partial Replacement every 20 years 20224 RHES EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2023

End Priority Four

Red Sandstone Elementary Red Sandstone, 551 N. Frontage Road, Vail, CO 81657 Principal: Marcie Laidman Mascot: Tiger Cubs Colors: Red and White

Square Footage: 45,527 Built: 1977 Site Acreage: 5.8 useable acres. Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 247, Stressed 260) w/o pk Enrollment 2014/2015: 258 w/ pk Enrollment 2015/2016: 222/ 235 w/pk 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 225 2020 Projected Enrollments- 181, 181, 181 2023 Projected Enrollments- 172, 172, 172 * Projected Enrollments are without Pre-K. Staff and Teacher Size: 22 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 185 S.F.) Replacement Cost: As designed: $18,2 Million New Program (55,000 S.F.) $23.3 Million. Cost of return: 46.1% of Replacement Cost Level of Need: Poor.

Recommendations: Build New Structure while existing remains. Facility Needs – Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life

Secured Entries, Door Access Systems, Cameras Pre-K Playground Handicap Accessibility


Building Preservation Needs Classroom Size

Equity LCD Projectors in Classrooms Furniture Replacements Capacity Issues – Addition/ Renovation/ New Office Space Various Renovations to spaces Cafeteria

Community Site Circulation Environmental Sustainability HVAC Upgrade


* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. School Mission: Red Sandstone Elementary School (RSES) is the only public school located in the heart of Vail. Established in 1977, RSES is a true community school that is nestled in the beautiful mountains. We believe in providing a strong foundation for all students in both academics and character development. Vision: We are committed to all students: Respecting themselves, their community, and their world. Succeeding in academic achievement and citizenship. Excelling to new levels each day. Solving problems for themselves, their community, and their world. Mission Statement: RSES is a collaborative learning community inspiring excellence for all. At RSES we believe in: • Inspiring students to learn through engaging, meaningful educational opportunities • Creating a love of learning by providing opportunities for students to reach out to the community and explore the world

Red Sandstone Elementary Facility Evaluation Page - 2

• Implementing instructional strategies that meet the different learning styles of students • Maintaining high expectations for all learners • Creating a learning environment that encourages collaboration, communication and support of each other • Emphasizing character development in the classroom and in the community At RSES we are able to promote our vision and mission by working as a collaborative team with parents, students and the community. All of these attributes help contribute to a successful school environment that works towards developing the whole child. Evaluation School Community- Specific, partnerships Red Sandstone Elementary is the only public school located in the heart of the Vail Valley. True community school nestled in a beautiful mountain scenery. Scenery and a strong commitment to educating all students are the things that make Red Sandstone a great school. Site is Town owned and leased to School district. Heavy Town of Vail and recreational usage in Gym. Playground funded by GOCO grant. Assessable to public. Soccer and playfield part of Town and District agreement. (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) Vail Recreation District Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships Built in 1977. No additions. Only Public school located in Vail. Highly valued access to the Town core via the pedestrian bridge. Utilization Instructional Spaces: Current utilization is on average 22 students per classroom in average classroom sizes of 640 square feet or 29 square foot per student. This number is per the capacity study of an average of 30 square feet per student for 2-5 grades. Currently the building is operating just below the square footage method stressed level. In this specific case the per student method should not be used since he per student method notes 20, 23 and 25 (grade dependent) students per classroom. The classroom sizes limit the size of classes to 21. When comparing Red Sandstone to the new built schools there are some deficiencies which are noticed:

cafeteria

varied computer classroom space group work areas teacher restrooms conference rooms adequate office space classroom storage general storage music room special needs accommodations

The current Pre-Kindergarten rooms were renovations done in 2000 as more of a temporary solution. Raised restrooms built above the slab for drainage provides issues with drainage of sewer and smells. Rooms lacks updated design, flexibility and function. In classroom partitions do not function. Ability to open rooms for larger group functions is desired. Stage is currently underutilized due to age and functionality of the curtain and tracks and flooring. Tiger Pit area is not used. Area directly in front of entry doors. Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: Need to update power structure for computers and future technology. Educational Technology: One computer classroom. Classroom sizes do not allow for “smart boards” or similar technology to be installed as permanent equipment. Temporary equipment is moved in and out of rooms. Media Center reconfiguration for Technology center. Safety Current entry layout does not provide a secured vestibule for entry. No secured door system is available. Relocation of Administration is difficult due to main corridor from classrooms to gym and upper level. Doors from lower level classrooms to exterior. No longer required in new code. Provide multiple entry locations to building. Fire Alarm- Update fire alarm panel and devices. Card Access- Due to high public use card access could be used to limit keys distributed for Public use. Easier control of exterior doors.


Lack of Night Lighting for additional security measures. Codes Accessibility- Built in 1977 the existing structure does not conform to current accessibility codes. Issues such as restrooms, ramps, door entries, water fountains, and pathways need to be updated and brought into code. Structure- Due to age of structure an evaluation of the 1977 code and current code should be reviewed. Exiting – Heaving of concrete at south exit doors limit exiting in case of emergency if doors do not open. Environmental, Indoor air-quality Sewer Smells are prevalent in main office. Roof Leaks above boiler room. Windows and doors are existing on the lower level and north elevation. Poor weather barriers and broken seals in glass. Programs Delivered in Facility Colorado State Standards. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Variable Speed HW Pumps Destratification Replace aging HVAC Systems Install new high efficiency water fixtures Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Install controls for Heat Tape Replace/ renovate Windows (Partial) Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize Ice Maker Install air curtain for kitchen door

Utilities Annual Cost - $50,696 Cost per Square Foot – $1.11



4% of Replacement Cost – existing building - $728,000 $15.99 per SF


SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; Classroom size: Average size 640 SF compared to district average of 850. Class sizes are restricted to 22. Square footage does not include storage space provided in newer schools which is not present here. Lack of Cafeteria space. Creates conflicts with scheduling of gym and lunch periods. Computer classrooms. Creates conflicts during state testing periods and use of computers during those times. District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations District Summary of Major Deficiencies Parking availability is limited. Existing parking provides for 23 spots not including spaces used in the bus loop. Typical spaces required at a minimum for this size school is approximately 45. Drop off and bus pick up is shared. Major issues with on site circulation with crossing of students and traffic. Pavement condition is poor. Repairs of asphalt and concrete are needed. Pre-K Playground access is not accessible. Asphalt playground in front of school is not utilized appropriately and actually creates a hazard for students. Snow build up at west end creates issue for students accessing playground.


General Observations Site circulation and parking stress the site and create hazards and

strict limitations. Classroom sizes are undersized and per one occupancy

measurement the school is at a stressed level. At a stressed level usage, maintenance and costs are exaggerated.

School design has developed tremendously since 1977. Studies have shown that updated school design techniques, daylighting and etc. increase test scores.

The cost to renovate the school is over 40% of a replacement value for a school of a larger size.

Secured entry needed. Summary of Principal Interview: Building Issues High Priority Issues

Small Classrooms (currently average about 22 students per classroom) Due to room issues they have an extra white board that is stored in the space for projectors which creates more of an issues with storage.

Storage in Classrooms (Classroom and Cubbies) Lack of technology Security Vestibule Classroom partitions need work. Not preferred. Proper Pre-K design, plumbing issues and playground access. Parking.

Medium Priority Issues Group work areas Roof leaks above boiler. Basketballs over fence and bounce to I-70.

Low Priority Issues Pre-K landscaping Continued room changes for STEM programing in upper level

multi purpose room. Wants

Pk-8 will not fit in current structure. Cafeteria Black top play area in front is not needed. Staff restroom upstairs.

Uniqueness 2 classes per grade

Old Vail community, access to town center via pedestrian bridge. High use of gym.

Utilization Teacher office space ok. Stage – underutilized. New curtains, flooring. Tiger Pit – underutilized. Area in front of main entrance.


No new school issues. Priorities

Confirmed priorities. Accessibility/ ADA compliance should be moved to one.

Red Sandstone ElementaryFacility Needs List




Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year1 RSES INT Classrooms 4 3 Classroom Size ‐ Limited to 22/ Addition, Capacity increase (80)? 20161 RSES INT Storage 4 3 Classroom Storage and Cubbies 20161 RSES INT Technology 3 3 Lack of Technology ‐ Computers, Infrastructure. 2016

1 RSES INTSecured Entrance/ All Doors Lockedat Main Entrance 1 1 Standardize Entry Camera System with district. 2018

1 RSES IT Security Cameras 2 3 Front Entry and drop off coverage. 2018

1 RSES SYS Door Access System 2 3Add card access system to control six doors. Door detection system all doors. 2018

1 RSES INT Operable walls 2 1 re‐vinyl, refurbish as needed 20161 RSES GRDS PreK playground 1 1 Needs replacement. Redesign ‐ needs ada equipment and access 20231 RSES GRDS PreK playground media 1 1 Needs fill 20161 RSES INT Pre K Classroom 3 2 In PreK. Needs upgrade/improvement 20161 RSES EXT Parking Lot Asphalt 2 2 Repair/resurface as needed of drive and bus loop 20161 RSES GRDS Asphalt 2 2 Pathway Needs to be replaced 20161 RSES GRDS Playground Asphalt 2 2 Repair/Resurface as needed , fencing repair 20161 RSES GRDS Playground 1 1 Move Basketball net‐ Balls go onto I‐70. 20161 RSES GRDS Sidewalks 2 2 Replace as needed 2016

1 RSES INT Stage/ Tiger Pit 4 1Renovation ‐ Replace curtain, upgrades to floor. Tiger Pit redesign ‐ underutlizied space. 2016

1 RSES INT Gym/ Cafeteria/ Kitchen 4 1

Renovation‐ Walls, floors, HVAC, after school program area, lighting, separate cafeteria, Vail Recreation Room above gym ‐ renovation? Grease trap. Kitchen heat ‐ make up air. CFCS ‐ HFCS replacement. POS upgrades. 2016

1 RSES EXT Exit Doors ‐ Heaving? 1 3 Rear door by ramp out of gym on north side. Needs snow melt system 20161 RSES INT Window Coverings 2 2 Replace every 15 years 20161 RSES IT Computer Rooms 4 2 Converted 2 classrooms. Both need A/C. Upgrade electrical and data 20161 RSES INT Asbestos 1 1 Asbestos continaing floor tile and fittings 20183 RSES INT ADA Compliance 3 4 Not compliant. No elevator. Ramp is not ADA. Install elevator 20181 RSES INT Mechanical 2 1 Exhaust fans in hallways. 20181 RSES INT Classrooms 3 3 LCD Projectors 20161 RSES IT Phones 2 1 Replace Phones 20161 RSES IT Paging Systems 2 2 Replace outdated Paging System Backboard 20221 RSES INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 2018

End Priority One






2 RSES EXT Roof 2 1 Replace roof at 20 years ‐ Check B&M roofing plan. 20162 RSES INT Space 4 3 Group Work Areas 20162 RSES INT Classroom 4 3 Continue room renovation for STEM 20162 RSES INT Offices 4 5 Additional Office Space 20162 RSES INT Restrooms 4 5 Staff Restrooms on West end upstairs. 20162 RSES GRDS Site 2 2 Reroute hillside drainage at west end to underground 20162 RSES SYS Fire Alarm System 2 1 Fire alarm upgrade every 20 years 20162 RSES INT Custodial Equipment 2 2 Replace every 10 years 20162 RSES EXT Windows 2 3 replace fogged windows 20162 RSES INT Paint 2 3 Interior repaint 20162 RSES GRDS Irrigation 2 3 Upgrades needed. Central control. 20162 RSES EXT Doors 2 2 Original. Replace at renovation. Front door needs replaced asap 20182 RSES INT Night Lighting 1 1 None. Add night lighting‐ Security 20182 RSES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 2 2 Put on JCI controls 20232 RSES EXT Windows 5 2 Replacement of windows & window frames‐ Lower level and back 20232 RSES INT Drinking Fountains 2 2 Partial replacement 20232 RSES INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 20202 RSES INT HVAC 2 2 Replace aging Equipment 2020

2 RSES MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 RSES KITCH HVAC 2 2 Add air curtain. 20202 RSES KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 RSES INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 RSES GRDS Bus/Parent Drop Off Circulation 4 4 Needs to be redesigned. Increase parking 2023

End Priority Two

3 RSES HVAC VFD 5 3 Need four, plus 20163 RSES EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 caulk and seal all exterior doors and windows/replace sealants 20163 RSES EXT Exterior Façade 2 2 replace/reseal at masonry, metal panels, etc 2016

3 RSES INT Carpet 2 3Replace every 30 years. Partial replacement (Carpet replaced in 2001 and 2002) 2020

3 RSES EXT Back Deck 1 1 Back deck in disrepair. Safety issue. 20203 RSES KITCH Flooring 2 2 OK ‐ Epoxy ‐ Review at 15 years 2020






3 RSES EXT Heat Tape 2 1Replace every 10 years . Internal roof drains. Replace where needed at front. Add Controls. 2020

3 RSES EXT Crub Appeals 2 1Minor repairs and paint of siding in 2012. Redesign. Replace all siding, metal panels at concrete? 2023

3 RSES INT Restrooms 2 2 Replace fixtures every 25 years. Total restroom renovation. ADA compliance 20233 RSES INT Floor Tile 2 2 Replace every 30 years. Carpet upper level 20233 RSES KITCH Cafeteria Tables 2 2 Replace every 15 years 20233 RSES EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 2 3 Retrofit to LED 20233 RSES INT Acoustical Ceiling 2 3 Replace every 20 years. Original. 20233 RSES INT FF&E 3 3 Replace every 25 years 20233 RSES INT Residential Appliances 2 3 Replace every 10 years.Refurbish staff lounge 20233 RSES GRDS Trash/Recycle 2 4 Redesign. 20233 RSES INT Cabinetry 2 4 Partial Replacment every 30 Years‐ Cabinets were replaced in 2009 20233 RSES INT Learning Walls 2 4 Replace at renovation 20233 RSES INT Scoreboards ‐ main 2 4 Replace at renovation 20233 RSES INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20233 RSES INT HVAC 5 2 Radiant Heaters in Gyms 20233 RSES KITCH Ice Makers 5 2 Optimize Ice Makers‐ Heat Exchangers 2023

End Priority Three

4 RSES INT Signage 4 4 Replace every 30 years. Replace at renovation 20234 RSES EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2023

End Priority Four


Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Principal: Geoff Grimmer Mascot: Colors:

Square Footage: 55632 Site Acreage: 45 acres. Built: 1978 Capacity: (Square footage based: Functional 370, Stressed 435) Enrollment 2014/2015: 180 Enrollment 2015/2016: 173 2009 Projected Enrollment for 2015- 56 Staff and Teacher Size: 38 Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): (SQFT Based – 150 S.F.) Replacement Cost: $22.3 Million Cost of return: 39% of Replacement Cost

Recommendations: Priorities 1 – 2 Provide for replacement of Water Tank at current size. Facility Needs - Highlights Health, Safety, Security, Student Life





Community Entry Renovations Environmental Sustainability HVAC Upgrade


* All full list of proposed scope of work in addendum. School Mission Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy is a remarkable and utterly unique public school that allows serious winter sports athletes the opportunity of world-class training and competition in their sport in a challenging, college-prep academic environment. The majority of our student-athletes compete on a national and international level, which entails extensive travel during the traditional school year. The Academy is specifically tailored to deliver its curriculum to a student body that can be spread across the globe. Every student travels with a laptop computer for easy access to schoolwork at all times. The use of innovative internet technologies allows teachers and students to remain in close communication. Students collect assignments, participate in discussion boards, take quizzes, download videos of lectures and receive real time instruction from teachers over the web. Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy's student-to-teacher-ratio of 10:1 (including the academic coaches) allows for individualized attention. Ski & Snowboard Club Vail provides funding for five to seven academic coaches per year who support students from August to May. Flexibility is key in our environment. Careful planning and monitoring of each student‚Äôs course work maintain a uniform opportunity for learning. Our students develop a deep level of independent learning that is unusual among high school students, but absolutely essential for future college and even Olympic athletes. MISSION Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy provides a challenging secondary and college preparatory academic program while supporting the athletic and personal goals of our students. In partnership with Ski and Snowboard Club Vail we facilitates the attainment of our students, dreams by offering challenging academics, flexible scheduling and individualized attention.

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Facility Evaluation Page - 2

School Community- Specific, partnerships Located in Minturn in Maloit Park. Ski Club Vail Senior Community (Memorandums of Understandings (MOUs) 20% of building is leased to Ski Club Vail. Historical Significance- Uniqueness- History, relationships Built in 1978 as the up Valley Middle school. In 2010 VSSA started using the Minturn Middle school building. In 1992, Teres Herbst created an academic arm of SSCV called Vail Valley Academy (VVA); six students and five teachers attend. By 1996, VVA had an enrollment of 36 student-athletes. In, 2007 SSCV and ECSD created the first public ski and snowboard academy in the country, Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy (VSSA). Enrollment for the first year was 31 students. In 2008, Geoffry Grimmer became VSSA Head of School; 9th-12th grades were supported by Battle Mountain High School and Minturn Middle School supported 6th-8th grades. With the support of ECSD, in 2009 VSSA opened as the first 6th-12th public ski and snowboard school in the United States with 7 full time faculty, an Office Manager, a Director of College Placement and a Director of Admissions. In the 2010-2011 school year, VSSA opened with over 90 students. In the 2013-2014 school year VSSA grew to 150+ students in grades 5 through 12 and in the 2014-2015 school year VSSA grew to 170+ students in grades 5 through 12. Utilization Large portion of building is leased out to Ski Club Utilization Matrix To be completed at later date as needed. Technology Infrastructure Explanation: More to follow Educational Technology: Infrastructure aging. Safety No secured entry.

Proximity to I-70 and pedestrian path. Codes Accessibility issues. Kitchen Ansul system. Playground. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Programs Delivered in Facility State Programs customized delivery method. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Variable Speed HW Pumps Destratification Replace aging HVAC Systems Radiant Heaters in Gym Install new high efficiency water fixtures Upgrade domestic Hot Water System Replace/ renovate Windows Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Optimize Ice Maker

Utilities





4% of Replacement Cost - $892,000 $16,55 per SF

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Facility Evaluation Page - 3

SF Analysis District Summary of Major Deficiencies; Operating within capacity studies. Lease to Ski Club Vail effectively reduces occupancy by approximately 80 students. District Utilization Matrix Provided as needed. Site Evaluations Eagle Valley Community Fund Building – Presents Hazards and liability. Playground issues. Surfacing and code. General Observations

Operates well for the VSSA specific needs as well as unique VSSA programs. Smaller percentage of whole building is used for VSSA.

Kitchen repairs- Depends on future of school and other developments on site. Will kitchen be needed?

Many items on the list as low priority need to be evaluated as currently needed for VSSA. In many instances some items are not and would not be used by VSSA so no need to spend the money.

VSSA really wants a facelift. That first impression clean up. Maintenance items for upkeep of building need to be completed.

How leases work into maintenance cost and upkeep of building. Summary of Principal Interview: Building Issues High Priority Issues (Both items - Will go very long way with Parents.)

Interior Facelift- Restrooms, paint. Secured Vestibule- Camera notification system? Building maintenance.

Medium Priority Issues Kitchen serving capabilities and cafeteria. If dorms are built may

provide serving and kitchen there. So, why spend large amounts?

Wants Spend less for consideration of future expansions. What is longevity of building? Will new building be needed for changing enrollment? No need to spend large amounts for renovations?

No need to spend money on items no being used- stage, bleachers, etc.

Uniqueness Ski and Snowboard academy- Varying school operation hours.

After dark. Utilization

No issues. Eagle Valley Community Fund Building – Large liability to district

and safety issue. Enrollment – 2015-2016 (180) Staff- 38 (4 Staff, 2 Custodial, 25 Teachers)


Gas smell near kitchen. Bus service from forest service lot to school.

Priorities Confirmed.

Vail Ski and Snowboard AcademyFacility Needs List





Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year1 VSSA GRDS Landscaping 1 1 Remove beetle kill pines around school 20161 VSSA GRDS Sidewalks 2 1 Replace as needed 20161 VSSA PARK Landscaping 1 1 Remove beetle kill pines. In park area 20161 VSSA SYS Fire Alarm System 1 1 Original. Fire alarm upgrade every 20 years. Upgrade 20161 VSSA EXT Parking Lot Asphalt 2 2 Patch, Repair, Crack Fill, Seal Coat, Curb paint, restripe 20161 VSSA EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 1 2 Enhance exterior lighting ‐ very dark. Wall packs on the building 20161 VSSA GRDS Fields 2 2 Amend soils and reseed 2016

1 VSSA SYSSecured Entrance/ All Doors Lockedat Main Entrance 1 2 Standardize Entry Camera System with district. 2016

1 VSSA SYS Security Cameras 1 3 Front Entry and drop off coverage. Additional Exterior Coverage. 2016

1 VSSA SYS Card Access System 1 3Add card access system to control four doors. Door detection system all doors. Remove existing security system. 2016

3 VSSA INT Window Coverings 2 1 Replace/ Install. Security Issue during lockdowns. 20161 VSSA INT Interior Paint 2 3 Repaint every 10 years. Needed asap 2016

1 VSSA INT PA System 1 1Original. Replace at renovation to be consistent with other schools. Add lockdown capability. 2016

1 VSSA INT Night Lighting 1 1 None. Add 20161 VSSA INT Drinking Fountains 2 2 Replace 20161 VSSA KITCH Flooring 2 2 Original.Replace at Renovation 20161 VSSA INT Doors 2 3 Refurbish existing. Replace missing 2016

1 VSSA INT Front Office Appearance 4 3Replace glass block with windows. Renovate entry. Restrooms‐ finishes, fixtures, accessibility. 2016

1 VSSA INT Kitchen 2 1 Ansul system upgrade to code 20181 VSSA INT Tunning 2 4 What to do with dust collector. 20181 VSSA EXT Drainage 2 1 Drainage issue at gym 20161 VSSA INT Carpet 2 1 Replace every 30 years. Replace at renovation 2022

1 VSSA INT Restrooms 2 1 Balance of school restrooms ‐ replace fixtures, address accessibility issues. 2022

1 VSSA GRDS Playground Equipment 1 3Needs to be replaced or removed within 5 years. Old outdated equipment ‐ not to current code (Review actual use?) 2022

1 VSSA INT ADA Compliance 3 1 Not compliant. Redesign at renovation 20231 VSSA INT Door Hardware 1 1 Door Hardware change out per State Code 2018

End Priority One







2 VSSA EXT Doors 2 2Doors/hardware are original. Replace all exterior door hardware and partial door replacement (rust) 2016

2 VSSA EXT Windows 2 2 Replace fogged windows 20162 VSSA KITCH Kitchen Equipment 2 3 Rotate equipment as needed. Assess at 15 years for rotation 20162 VSSA INT Emergency Gas Shut Offs 2 1 Upgrade existing to meet code 20162 VSSA IT Computer Rooms 3 2 Upgrade power and data 20162 VSSA INT Clock System 2 1 Needs GPS clock system installed to be consistent with other schools 20162 VSSA EQUIP Kitchen Equipment 2 2 Reach In Replacement ‐ CFC, HCFS 2018

2 VSSA INT Asbestos 1 1 Yes in some areas. See AHERA books for detail. Mitigate at renovation 20222 VSSA KITCH Grease Trap 2 1 None. Install grease trap (if kitchen is leased out, must install) 20222 VSSA INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 20202 VSSA INT HVAC 2 2 Replace aging Equipment 2020

2 VSSA MECH Hot Water 2 2Upgrade Domestic HW‐ High Efficency, Controls, Commissioning, remove storage tanks 2020

2 VSSA KITCH HVAC 2 2 Add air curtain. 20202 VSSA KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 20202 VSSA EXT Windows 2 1 Add reflective film to windows 20162 VSSA INT Lighting 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 20232 VSSA HVAC Kitchen Heat 2 2 Needs to be improved 2022

End Priority Two

3 VSSA GRDS Site 1 2Establish fire ring around building. Establish concrete walks around building to allow for snow removal with tractor 2016

3 VSSA INT Classrooms 4 3 Need renovation, facelift 20163 VSSA INT Dark Room 4 3 Remodel existing for storage 20163 VSSA INT Operable walls 4 3 Four. Replace/repair at Renovation 20153 VSSA INT Cabinetry 2 3 Replace every 30 Years. 20163 VSSA KITCH POS Stations 2 3 OK. Redesign at Renovation 20163 VSSA INT FF&E 3 2 Replace every 25 years. 20223 VSSA EXT Exterior Façade 2 1 Replace façade, repaint 20163 VSSA EXT Exterior Façade 2 1 caulk and seal building exterior 20163 VSSA GRDS Trash/Recycle 4 1 Redsign dock area. Build bear‐proof enclosure. 2016






Priority School Area Item Cat. Action Year3 VSSA HVAC VFD 5 1 Add 6 VFDs. Change out motors to high effeciency, plus 20163 VSSA INT Bleachers 2 1 Refurbish every 5 years. 20163 VSSA GRDS Playground Asphalt 4 2 Resurface (Remove?) 20163 VSSA INT Residential Appliances 2 3 Replace every 10 years. Replace all 20163 VSSA PARK Picnic Area 4 4 Remove or replace picnic tables, trash containers in park area 20163 VSSA KITCH Kitchen 2 1 caulk and seal countertops 20163 VSSA INT Locker Rooms 2 2 Refurbish plumbing fixtures at renovation 20163 VSSA INT Gym 2 3 Refinish gym floors, replace lighting with flourescent and paint 20163 VSSA INT Tile 2 3 Replace every 30 years. Abatement and replacement at renovation 20163 VSSA INT Scoreboards ‐ main gym 4 4 Original 20163 VSSA INT Stage Curtains 4 4 Replace at Renovation 2016

3 VSSA EXT Storage 3 2Remove existing old sheds. Add new storage with roll up door in new location 2016

3 VSSA EXT Windows 2 2 replace seals on doors and windows 2016

3 VSSA EXT Entry Road 4 2Build in snow storage. Add retaining walls where needed along creek. Widen shoulder. Resurface Road (Team with Town and SSCV) 2016

3 VSSA GRDS Snow Removal Equipment 2 2 2 snow blowers. Need tractor 20163 VSSA INT Custodial Equipment 2 1 Replace every 10 years 20183 VSSA EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 2 2 Put parking lot lights on JCI controls. 20223 VSSA EXT Lighting ‐ Exterior 5 3 Retrofit to LED 20223 VSSA EXT Windows 5 3 Replace. Original windows. 20223 VSSA GRDS Asphalt 4 3 Redesign back dock entry and resurface 20223 VSSA GRDS Irrigation 2 3 OK currently. Redesign when front entry redesigned 20223 VSSA GRDS Irrigation Systems 5 3 Install wireless controls district wide 20223 VSSA INT Acoustical Ceiling 2 3 Partial Replacement every 20 years. Replace at renovation 20223 VSSA INT HVAC 1 2 Destratification ‐ with fans, high spaces 20233 VSSA INT HVAC 5 2 Radiant Heaters in Gyms 20233 VSSA KITCH Ice Makers 5 2 Optimize Ice Makers‐ Heat Exchangers 2023

End Priority Three

4 VSSA INT Ski Lockers 4 4 Install 20164 VSSA KITCH Serving Line 2 4 Redesign at Bond (Shared Cost?) Serving Dorms? 20164 VSSA GRDS Stadium Bleachers 2 1 Old not to code. Remove? 2016







4 VSSA GRDS Bus/Parent Drop Off Circulation 4 4Redesign. Partner with SSCV, Redesign parking and front entry, stairs, ada ramp so building is visible and parking is better utilized 2016

4 VSSA INT Insulation 3 2 Upgrade insulation to meet New code 20164 VSSA INT Signage 4 3 Replace every 30 years 20164 VSSA SYS Fire Sprinkler 3 1 Not sprinklered (kitchen, stage sprnklered). Install sprinklers 20234 VSSA EXT Renewable Energy 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2023

End Priority Four

District Buildings

East Bus Barn

Square Footage: 10,300 Transportation: 7,000~ Food Service: 1,500~ Residential (2 Units): 1,800~ Site Acreage: 1.8 acres. Built: ? Replacement Cost: $3.5 Million Cost of return: 12% of Replacement Cost Level of Need: Good Recommendations: Priorities 1 – 4. Utilization Full. Technology Limited. Safety

Provide secured vestibule. Card Access needed. Codes No issues. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Replace aging systems Install new high efficiency water fixtures Insulate and seal building Optimize walk-in coolers Used oil furnace

Utilities




2% of Replacement Cost - $70,000 $13,59 per SF

General Observations

Operating as designed. Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues


Confirmation.

East Bus BarnFacility Needs List





Priority Building Area Item Cat. Action YearEBB INT Overhead Doors 2 2 Replace bay door harware and operators 2016EBB INT Paving 2 2 Apshalt and concrete paving repairs 2016EBB INT Mechanical 2 2 Replace exhaust fan 2020EBB INT Electrical 5 2 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 2022EBB INT Painting 2 4 Interior Paint 2022EBB EXT Building 5 2 Insulate Seal Building. 2020EBB INT HVAC 2 2 Optimize Control System ‐ Recommissioning, Strategies 2020EBB INT HVAC 5 2 Used Oil Furnace 2020

EBB INT Restrooms 2 2 High Efficient fixtures 2020RSES KITCH Walk Ins 2 2 Optimize Walk in Coolers‐ Compressors, Refrigerant 2020EBB HVAC Equipment 2 2 Replace Aging Equipment 2020EBB INT Sustainability 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2020

End of all Work

District Buildings/ Issues Facility Evaluation Page - 2

3rd Street Building/ West Bus Barn

Square Footage: 14,600 Transportation/ Delivery: 7,200~ Offices, Support (Technology, Food Service) : 5,900~ Board Room: 1,500 ~ Site Acreage: 1.8 acres. Built: ? Replacement Cost: $4.5 Million Cost of return: 23.6% of Replacement Cost Level of Need: Fair Recommendations: Replace with new combined facility off site. Utilization Full. Technology Limited.

Safety Provide secured vestibule. Card Access needed. Codes No issues. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Optimize Control System Replace aging systems Install new high efficiency water fixtures Insulate and seal building Used oil furnace

Utilities








Confirmed.

3rd Street Building/ West Bus BarnFacility Needs List





Priority Building Area Item Cat. Action YearWBB INT Technology 2 2 Move Main Frame from EVMS if new buildings 2020WBB INT Mechanical 2 2 Replace Mechanical Room Floor 2020WBB INT Mechanical 2 4 Redesign and Replace HVAC equipment, optimize 2020WBB INT Mechanical 1 1 Air Conditioning on Transportation Offices, Window in Break Room 2020WBB INT Mechanical 1 1 Parts Purchasing Office ‐ No air Circulation 2020WBB EXT Site 1 1 Fence Repairs 2020WBB INT Electrical 2 1 Upgrade Fire Alarm Panel 2020WBB INT Plumbing 2 2 Replace plumbing fixures 2020WBB INT Plumbing 2 4 Sewer line issues, drainage 2020WBB INT Plumbing 2 2 Replace hot water heater 2020WBB INT Mechanical 2 4 HVAC upgrade in Board room for cooling 2020WBB INT Electrical 2 4 Replace bus block heaters power outlets 2020

WBB EXT Mechanical 2 2 Replace electric heating in transportation area, less expensive running units 2020WBB INT Doors 2 2 Replace door into Transportation 2020WBB INT Doors 2 2 Replace all entry hardware 2020WBB INT Doors 2 2 Replace overhead hardware and operators 2020WBB INT Mechanical 2 1 Exhaust in storage room 2022WBB INT Plumbing 2 2 Relocate Grease interceptor outside 2022WBB INT Electrical 5 4 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 2022WBB INT Sustainability 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2020WBB INT HVAC 5 2 Used Oil Furnace 2020WBB EXT Building 5 2 Insulate Seal Building. 2020WBB INT HVAC 2 2 Radiant Gas Heaters 2020

End of All Work


District Office (Chambers Avenue)

Square Footage: 7,955 Main Level Offices- 4,925 Upper Level Offices- 1,700 Basement Storage- 1,330 Site Acreage: 1 acres. Built: ? Replacement Cost: $2.4 Million Cost of return: 12.3% of Replacement Cost Level of Need: Good Recommendations: Priorities 1 – 4. Utilization Full. Technology Limited. Safety Card Access needed.

Codes No issues. Environmental, Indoor air-quality No issues. Energy, HVAC, O&M Analysis Energy Performance (Code review, Utility Costs) Major Systems, Envelope Review, ability for new systems District Summary of Major Deficiencies and Potential Upgrades (Per Ameresco Report)

Interior Lighting Retrofit Optimize Control System Install VAV System Install new high efficiency water fixtures Insulate and seal building

Utilities








Confirmed.

District OfficeFacility Needs List





Priority Building Area Item Cat. Action YearDO INT Mechanical 2 2 Replace HVAC System, Optimize. 2016DO INT Paving 2 2 Apshalt and concrete paving repairs 2016DO INT Cable TV 4 3 Add Cable TV 2022DO INT Electrical 5 4 Interior Lighting Retrofit‐ Sensors, LED, Controls 2022DO INT Sustainability 5 2 Install Renewables ‐ Solar, Geo, etc. ‐ TBD 2020DO EXT Roof 2 2 Replace Asphalt Roofing 2030

End of All Work


Maintenance

Square Footage: 10,000~ Site Acreage: Below EVMS Gym Built: 1980’s Need consideration of moving if building is removed. Replacement cost: $2,000,000 Recommendations: Possible Relocation with Transportation and Technology off site. Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues


Confirmed.

Food Service – Commissary (Central Kitchen)

Square Footage: ??? Site Acreage: Location to be determined Location of new commissary kitchen to serve up and down valley schools from central location. Food Service is currently staffed at 3rd Street and at each school site. Discussions have occurred to have a centralized kitchen which provides food to all the sites. Provides quality control, reduced staffing needs, equipment costs and central teaching kitchen. Where would kitchen be located? Replacement cost: Part of construction at EVMS/EVES Summary of Community Meeting: New Issues

Consider expanding healthy foods – Breakfast, Eat, teach and breathe nutrition – students using kitchens.

School gardens and greenhouses Redesign facilities

Priorities

Confirmed.

Building Capacity Study

Eagle County School District

October 19th, 2012

Completed by:

TAB Associates, Inc. The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Boulevard Suite 210, Edwards, Colorado 81632 (970) 766-1470 (970) 766-1471 fax www.tabassociates.com [email protected]

Eagle County School District Building Capacity

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PURPOSE

DEFINITIONS

DISCUSSION METHODS DISTRICT HISTORY

CAPACITY DIRECTION

INITIAL CONCLUSIONS

INITIAL RECOMMENDATIONS

STAFF RESPONSE REVIEW OF STAFF RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION

WEB SITE RESEARCH


2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Based on a thorough review of school building design and use, Staff recommends the Board adopt the functional capacities listed below as new standardized building capacities. Staff also recommends that the District maximum class size be amended to included square footage calculations as a way to verify physical classrooms can accommodate class size.

School

Current Published Capacity (Including Pre-K)

Capacity Based on Square Footage per Student (Excluding Pre-K)

Battle Mountain High 1,000 Functional 1,169 Stressed 1,375Red Canyon - East - Functional 83 Stressed 98Berry Creek Middle 490 Functional 466 Stressed 548Vail Ski Snowboard Academy *** 415 Functional 370 Stressed 435Homestake Peak 650 Functional 653 Stressed 768Red Sandstone Elementary 365 Functional 247 Stressed 260Avon Elementary 410 Functional 443 Stressed 466June Creek Elementary 500 Functional 387 Stressed 408Edwards Elementary 430 Functional 459 Stressed 483Eagle Valley High 800 Functional 968 Stressed 1,139Red Canyon - West - Functional 81 Stressed 95Eagle Valley Middle 500 Functional 379 Stressed 446Gypsum Creek Middle 500 Functional 464 Stressed 546Eagle Valley Elementary 550 Functional 409 Stressed 430Brush Creek Elementary 500 Functional 489 Stressed 514Gypsum Elementary 550 Functional 444 Stressed 468Red Hill Elementary 450 Functional 402 Stressed 424Total All Schools 8,110 Functional 7,913 Stressed 8,903


3

NEW STANDARDIZED BUILDING CAPACITIES *** VSSA Calculated at 100% ECSD occupancy. The functional capacity of each building has been determined by the following factors:

Standardized square foot per student per elementary, middle and high. Elementary capacities exclude specials to allow for home classrooms and exclude district mandated program spaces. Pre-K classrooms are also not included.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

The published building capacity will be the functional capacity figure. The stressed capacity figure will be used by the District to manage growth when a school starts trending above the functional capacity by

triggering short term or long term decisions such as relocating district mandated program spaces, adding modulars or building additions, boundary revisions or building new schools.


4

PURPOSE The School District hired TAB Associates, Inc. to review the student capacities of all the school buildings in the district. A numbers of factors lead to this decision.

o District Maximum Class Size policy change for 2012. Maximum class sizes increased “due to shrinking revenues to education statewide”. o Maximum Class Size change could effect how older schools could properly handle increased class sizes in smaller classrooms. o Need to review all buildings since designs were based on lower student class sizes. Can a building support the increased student

population? o Building use changes using rooms for new special requirements like Title One, English as Second Language and etc.

DEFINITIONS Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross): Amount of space a student is associated with in comparison to the entire floor area of a school. These are acceptable standards based on National Averages. Elementary and Middle 150-200 Square Feet of Gross Area per student High 160-200 Square Feet of Gross Area per student Building Code: State adopted building code regulating life safety issues in a building. District Mandated Uses: These are typically general classrooms which are currently being used as District required non-full time uses. Current Mandated uses are (ESL/ELL, Cluster, and Title1). In a “stressed” capacity situation these rooms could be returned to general classrooms and the uses would need to be come floating uses or other spaces in the building would need to accommodate. In some cases not all three uses are currently present at a school. Ex. Capacity: Current published capacity of building by Eagle County School District. The capacity number is a full “Stressed Capacity”. Extra Classrooms: Currently used classrooms for uses other than a general classroom. The current use is typically not being used towards current capacity. In a “functional and stressed” capacity these rooms would be used towards the capacity number as a general classroom with full time use. ESL/ELA/ELL: English as a Second Language, English Language Acquisition, English Language Learners. Special Language programs for students in the process of learning English. Some buildings do have specific spaces designed for these uses while others are using general classrooms which could be used for “stressed” capacities. Functional Capacity: This measurement reflects the capability of a building to reasonably and efficiently house students at the published number. This capacity provides for growth spikes in student population without the need to build additional facilities. Functional Capacity also targets a smaller classroom size more in line with “Original Maximum per student” numbers.


5

Cluster: Small group learning focusing on specific academic needs. Some buildings do have specific spaces designed for these uses while others are using general classrooms which could be used for “stressed” capacities. Current General Classrooms: Current (2011-2012 school year) breakdown of Classrooms provided for general core subjects. Maximum Square Footage per student: National recognized rules of thumb for amount of space in a room associated with each student in that room. The space includes seating and walking areas, storage and teaching space. Kindergarten-First Grade 30-40 Square Feet per student (CDE-35 SF) Second-Fifth Grade 25-35 Square Feet per student (CDE-32 SF) Sixth-Twelfth Grade 25-35 Square Feet per student (CDE-32 SF) New Maximum per student: Maximum number of students in a classroom as revised and published by Eagle County School District starting in 2012 school year. (Kindergarten, First Grade – 25 Students per class) (Second and Third – 30 Students per class) (Grades Four though Six – 30 Students per class) (Grades Seven through Twelve – A school average of 25 students per class) Original Maximum per student: Maximum number of students in a classroom as originally published by Eagle County School District in 1989. (Kindergarten, First Grade – 20 Students per class) (Second and Third – 23 Students per class) (Grades Four though Six – 25 Students per class) (Grades Seven through Twelve – A school average of 25 students per class) Pre-K: Pre-Kindergarten are classrooms specifically designed and used for this use. Programs Included: These are the “Specials” included in the Capacity of a building. Specials are not included in Elementary and Specials increase in number from Middle to High. Specials: Additional educational offerings and classrooms outside of a “general classroom”. In the middle and high schools these classrooms are utilized to achieve tighter class scheduling. Typically these rooms are specifically designed for these classes. Stressed Capacity: This measurement reflects that the building is at maximum capacity. The building can still function within “Building Code” and within “New Maximum per student” numbers. This capacity helps signify a possible need for new facilities or redistribution of students to other schools. Title 1: Title I is a federally-funded, general education support program. The goal of Title I Reading is to provide extra reading help and instruction for struggling readers. Some buildings do have specific spaces designed for these uses while others are using general classrooms which could be used for “stressed” capacities. Utilization Rate: This percentage is based on recognized national rules of thumb where a “Stressed Capacity” is reduced by a certain percentage for school growth. It also reflects the educational appropriate percentage of the school day that teaching stations can be used for instruction. Typical rates are: Elementary 95-100%, Middle/Jr/ High 70-85% and Senior High 80-85%. The rate basically reflects the difference between “Stressed Capacity” and “Functional Capacity”. The higher the rate equals tighter class scheduling.


6

DISCUSSION There are many ways to estimate a schools capacity. You can use square footage per classroom, gross building square footage per student, maximum number of students per class, staff availability and ratios, and many other methods initiated and developed by individual Districts, Towns and States. Eagle County School District has historically used a maximum student count per class room. Recently the District revised these counts which subsequently could raise the capacity of the schools. The question has been raised whether or not the existing school can hold the extra capacity. CAPACITY DIRECTION During a number of discussions with the District Superintendant, District Financial Officer, Land Resource Committee, other staff and TAB Associates, Inc. the District decided to pursue a square footage method as a verification and check of the Districts maximum student count per class room method. The square footage methods uses National recognized rules of thumb for amount of space in a room associated with each student in that room. The space includes seating and walking areas, storage and teaching space. This method will help identify if existing classrooms are large enough to handle the new maximum student count per classroom. TAB Associates, Inc. and District staff reviewed each site in the Spring of 2012 to determine how existing rooms were currently being utilized. We inputted this information into the attached spreadsheets. We determined what was being used as a general classroom, science room, conference rooms and etc. Included in the spreadsheet are the average class square footage and total square footage per grade. The total square footage was divided by the recognized rule of thumb for the grade or class type to determine a capacity for those rooms. To compare the square footage method with the District student maximum size we show a column with the average class size determined by square footage (light blue column number 3). This column is used to reference back to the maximum student count per class (purple column number 1). If the square foot capacities (blue column number 2) are smaller than the district capacity (purple column 2) then the room(s) can not hold the District maximum student count per class. See example below. In this example the second grade classrooms would only hold 43 students while the District maximum is 60 students for those classrooms. The District max will not fit in these classrooms. The Maximum class size would only be 21 per classroom.


7

The square footage numbers used in this study are an average of the range of square footage guidelines we found nationally. Per discussions with the School District team some of the square footage numbers were increase above the national averages. The Square footage numbers decided by the team are as follows. Kindergarten-First Grade 40 Square Feet per student Second-Fifth Grade 30 Square Feet per student Sixth-Twelfth Grade 32 Square Feet per student In determining the Usable Square Footage in a classroom we included all space from the inside of the walls including casework. Not including adjacent storage rooms, offices and etc. The building capacity for general classrooms provides a stressed capacity for Elementary but in the case of Middle and Senior High the capacity can be increased by adding in specials classrooms. Typically Middle schools will not add as many specials in the rotation of scheduling as in a Senior High. The spreadsheet lists all the specials classrooms available in Middle and Senior High but we only included the highlighted specials as part of the capacity calculation. (It is understood that as education changes and evolves district guidelines, different specials or scheduling rotation could delete or included other specials in the capacity.) In many schools current general classrooms are being used for other District Mandated programs like Title 1 and English as a Second Language. Since these are mandated programs and need rooms we broke these program out in a separate row. They are being provided in a room which would typically be used for capacity. So, if a building reaches its “Stressed” capacity these rooms could be returned to general classrooms to increase the capacity for the short term. We also have not included Pre-Kindergarten in the capacity counts. These programs are funded outside of the general capacity funds. All the Pre-K rooms are currently designed for Pre-K uses. The spreadsheet notes two capacities. “Stressed” and “Functional”. At both capacities the school will function properly in regards to available building facilities (cafeteria, restrooms, etc.) but the “Functional” capacity is the desired operating level. When the school begins to trend towards


8

the “Stressed” capacity triggers the District to review the need for additions or modular’s to the building, new schools or review of the district boundaries. If all schools operate for a prolonged period at the “Stressed Capacity” it could create situations were schools are over populated above the “Stressed Capacity” when there is growth in the community. This Growth could occur quickly enough that the District could not redistrict or build new facilities. The two capacities give the District the ability and time to adjust as noted above. This spreadsheet provides some flexibility in determining the proper class sizes and can give direction to the Principals in how to use the classrooms. In the Eagle County School District each school can operate differently with different educational philosophies and direction from other schools in the District. The actual capacity of the school could vary from these numbers depending on the school scheduling and staff. INITIAL CONCLUSIONS With only one school being the exception (Battle Mountain High) all the schools would not function properly within the Nationally Recognized square foot standards at the “Functional” and “Stressed” level if the District’s published Maximum Students per Class were used for class sizing. This study does show that the District’s published maximum students per classroom can not be used unless it is compared to the square footage available in a classroom. The square footage number used for classroom is an average number determined from national guidelines and this District could determine that the square footage numbers used are to high or to low, thus changing the building capacities. We also noticed there are six schools which currently have published capacities which are higher than the square footage method at the “stressed” level and five schools higher than the District maximum students per classroom. In the case of the Eagle schools and Gypsum Elementary these schools did have modular’s at one time and the capacities could be based on those added classrooms which have been removed. Red Hill and June Creek were both designed with the previous lower maximum student counts per classroom. Red Sandstone has lost some classrooms to additional mandated programs and two classrooms to pre-school functions. One other note, and possible comparison of buildings and square footages per student. At the bottom of each capacity sheet we show the Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross). This is the square footage assigned to each student for the entire building. Some Districts use this as a check as to whether or not a building is to small or to large for the student count. In all cases in this District the square footages fall within the national averages. INITIAL RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The District published maximum students per classroom could still remain as a maximum guideline. But, a footnote should be added that the square footage of a classroom may not allow the maximum number of students to fit in the classroom.


9

2. As part of the footnote in number one above, the District should publish with the maximum student numbers the acceptable square footages per classroom. The numbers in this report could be accepted or adjusted. 3. The District should review the published school capacities and adjust capacities which are over District Maximum Students and per the Square Footage method. WEBSITE RESEARCH: Below are a websites which provided data on square footages and utilization rates used across the nation. Capacity: http://www.adams14.org/Websites/adams14/images/03-2_A-14_SD_MP_Appendix_Ed_Planning.ppt http://www.egcsd.org/budget_tax/budget/brac/packet%20brac%202012-02-13%20-2012%20ENROLLMENT%20STUDY-EG.pdf http://mlis.state.md.us/other/education/public_school_facilities_2003/Definition%20of%20Standards.pdf http://info.sos.state.tx.us/pls/pub/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=T&app=9&p_dir=F&p_rloc=102796&p_tloc=14964&p_ploc=1&pg=6&p_tac=&ti=19&pt=2&ch=61&rl=1036 http://www.cde.ca.gov/ls/cs/k3/recommend.asp http://www.nhschoolreform.org/PDFs%20and%20Docs/Facilities%20Handbook.pdf http://www.douglas.co.us/zoning/documents/ZR-AppendixB.pdf Utilization and Gross Average Square Footage: http://www.brainspaces.com/PRES/BrainSpaces-PRES_2007-1006_Capacity-CEFPI.pdf Utilization Rate: http://www.d11.org/FOTC/capacitycharts/Capacity%20Model%20Description%20(new).pdf Gross Average Square Footage: http://www.dpi.state.nd.us/finance/construct/sqfoot.pdf http://www.21csf.org/csf-home/DocUploads/DataShop/DS_44.pdf

TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacitySummary

1/28/2016

School

Current Published Capacity (Including Pre-K)

2012-2013 Enrollment

Capacity Based on Square Footage per Student

Capacity Based on NEW Maximum Students per Class set by District

School capable of operating within NEW Maximum Students per Class set by District when compared to available square

footage in classroom.Battle Mountain High 1,000 784 Functional 1,169 Functional 1,131 XXX

Stressed 1,375 Stressed 1,330 XXX

Red Canyon - East - 92 * Functional 83 Functional 170Stressed 98 Stressed 200

Berry Creek Middle 490 340 Functional 466 Functional 514 Stressed 548 Stressed 605

Vail Ski Snowboard Academy 415 165 ** Functional 370 Functional 412 Stressed 435 Stressed 485

Homestake Peak 650 491 Functional 653 Functional 782 Stressed 768 Stressed 885

Red Sandstone Elementary 365 *** 287 Functional 247 Functional 323 Stressed 260 Stressed 340

Avon Elementary 410 261 Functional 443 Functional 466 Stressed 466 Stressed 490

June Creek Elementary 500 *** 288 Functional 387 Functional 456 Stressed 408 Stressed 480

Edwards Elementary 430 336 Functional 459 Functional 485 Stressed 483 Stressed 510

Eagle Valley High 800 701 Functional 968 Functional 1,020 Stressed 1,139 Stressed 1,200

Red Canyon - West - 92 * Functional 81 Functional 149Stressed 95 Stressed 175

Eagle Valley Middle 500 *** 284 Functional 379 Functional 417 Stressed 446 Stressed 490

Gypsum Creek Middle 500 346 Functional 464 Functional 493 Stressed 546 Stressed 580

Eagle Valley Elementary 550 *** 266 Functional 409 Functional 456 Stressed 430 Stressed 480

Brush Creek Elementary 500 470 Functional 489 Functional 594 Stressed 514 Stressed 625

Gypsum Elementary 550 *** 340 Functional 444 Functional 480 Stressed 468 Stressed 505

Red Hill Elementary 450 *** 357 Functional 402 Functional 489 Stressed 424 Stressed 515

Total All Schools 8,110 5,900 Functional 7,913 Functional 8,835 Stressed 8,903 Stressed 9,895

* Red Canyon Includes New America and World Academy** Capacity is for entire school with ECSD capacity maximums.*** Current Published Capacity is Higher than Capacity Based on Square Footage per Student

TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityAvon Elementary

1/28/2016

Current Quantity of Rooms per Grade

Average Room Square Footage

Total Room Square Footage

Suggested Standard for Maximum Square Foot Per Student **

Capacity Based on Square Foot Per Student Per Grade

Maximum Average Class Size

Original Maximum Students per classrm

Current Capacity for Original Maximum Students per Class

New Maximum Students per Classrm

Capacity for NEW Maximum Students per Class per Grade per Grade per Grade

Square Foot average per

Student based on new

Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom

Kindergarten 2 1,120 s.f. 2,240 s.f. 40 s.f. 56 28 20 40 25 50 45 s.f.

First Grade 2 880 s.f. 1,760 s.f. 40 s.f. 44 22 20 40 25 50 35 s.f.

Second 3 880 s.f. 2,640 s.f. 30 s.f. 88 29 23 69 30 90 29 s.f.

Third 2 880 s.f. 1,760 s.f. 30 s.f. 59 29 23 46 30 60 29 s.f.

Fourth 2 880 s.f. 1,760 s.f. 30 s.f. 59 29 25 50 30 60 29 s.f.

Fifth 2 880 s.f. 1,760 s.f. 30 s.f. 59 29 25 50 30 60 29 s.f.

Extra Classrooms- Science, Spanish, Child Find, Reading 4 768 s.f. 3,070 s.f. 30 s.f. 102 26 23 92 30 120 26 s.f.

Total General Classrooms 17 786 s.f. 14,990 s.f. 29 s.f. 466 24 387 490 28 s.f. EX. Capacity 410

Based on Student Count

Cog. Needs 1 520 s.f. 520 s.f. 100 s.f. 5 2 12 12 43 s.f.Art 1 1,100 s.f. 1,100 s.f. 50 s.f. 22 22 25 25 44 s.f.Music 1 1,200 s.f. 1,200 s.f. 45 s.f. 27 27 25 25 48 s.f.Gymnasium 1 4,450 s.f. 4,450 s.f. 75 s.f. 59 59 75 75 59 s.f.Computer 1 600 s.f. 600 s.f. 25 s.f. 24 12 30 30 20 s.f.Media 1 2,270 s.f. 2,270 s.f. 45 s.f. 50 50 50 50 45 s.f.

District Mandated Uses in General Classroom

Cluster, ESL, Title 1 (See definitions) 3 880 s.f. 2,640 s.f. 30 s.f. 88 29 23 69 30 90 29 s.f.

Pre-K Pre-K 2 680 s.f. 1,360 s.f. *** s.f. 30 15 15 30 15 30 45 s.f.Total Specials 10,140 s.f. 188 217 43

Stressed Capacity 466

District Mandated Uses could be added.


Functional Capacity 443

95% utilization Rate



Total All Spaces - Per Maximum Student Count 25130 s.f. Total Building Square Footage 67780 s.f.

Average Square Footage Per Student (Gross) 153 s.f.

Acceptable Standard 100-150 s.f.

Building Code maximum floor area in general classrooms per student per 2006 IBC is 20 square feet.

* Pre-K - 30 is required 50 is recommended.** Suggested Square Footages have been derived from a number of sources and does not widely vary. We found square footages from 25-50 which alsodepended on Grade Level.*** Capacities for Pre-K are based on Capacities published ECSD November 2011.

Spe

cial

sC

urre

nt G

ener

al C

lass

room

s

Room Sizes Square Footage Per Students in ClassroomCapacity Based on Student Count per

TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityBattle Mountain High

1/28/2016










Capacity for NEW Maximum Students per Class per Grade



Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom

General 29 833 s.f. 24,157 s.f. 32 s.f. 755 26 25 725 25 725 33 s.f.


Programs Included

(Highlighted) Based on Student Count

Program Included (Highlighted)

Spec. Ed 1 600 s.f. 600 s.f. 60 s.f. 10 10 12 12 50 s.f.Technology 3 677 s.f. 2,031 s.f. 30 s.f. 68 23 25 75 25 75 27 s.f.Art 2 1,027 s.f. 2,053 s.f. 50 s.f. 41 21 25 50 25 50 41 s.f.Music 2 1,388 s.f. 2,775 s.f. 50 s.f. 56 28 25 50 25 50 56 s.f.Consumer and Fam. 1 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 40 s.f. 25 25 25 25 25 25 40 s.f.Auditorium 1 6,900 s.f. 6,900 s.f. 275 s.f. 25 25 25 25 276 s.f.Lecture 1 1,700 s.f. 1,700 s.f. - s.f. 80 80 25 80 21 s.f.Gymnasium 2 9,301 s.f. 18,601 s.f. 125 s.f. 149 74 75 150 124 s.f.Fitness 3 2,153 s.f. 6,460 s.f. 125 s.f. 52 17 25 75 86 s.f.Wood Shop 1 2,675 s.f. 2,675 s.f. 100 s.f. 27 27 25 25 25 25 107 s.f.Science 6 1,313 s.f. 7,878 s.f. 45 s.f. 175 29 25 150 25 150 53 s.f.Computer 5 814 s.f. 4,070 s.f. 25 s.f. 163 33 25 125 33 s.f.Media 1 4,900 s.f. 4,900 s.f. 45 s.f. 109 109 50 50 98 s.f.

Total Specials 61,643 s.f. 620 375 605 781100



Functional Capacity w/ specials 1169




Total All Spaces - Per Maximum Student Count 85800 s.f.Total Building Square Footage 209000 s.f.




* Pre-K - 30 is required 50 is recommended.** Suggested Square Footages have been derived from a number of sources and vary from 25-50 which also depend on grade level.*** Capacities for Pre-K are based on Capacities published ECSD November 2011.

Spe

cial

sG

ener

al

Cla

ssro

oms


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityBerry Creek Middle

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom

Sixth 6 760 s.f. 4,560 s.f. 32 s.f. 143 24 25 150 30 180 25 s.f.

Seventh 6 760 s.f. 4,560 s.f. 32 s.f. 143 24 25 150 25 150 30 s.f.

Eighth 6 760 s.f. 4,560 s.f. 32 s.f. 143 24 25 150 25 150 30 s.f.


Programs Included


Program Included

Spec. Ed 1 780 s.f. 780 s.f. 60 s.f. 13 13 12 12 65 s.f.ESL 1 780 s.f. 780 s.f. 30 s.f. 26 26 25 25 31 s.f.Art 1 1,072 s.f. 1,072 s.f. 50 s.f. 21 21 25 25 43 s.f.Music 1 1,450 s.f. 1,450 s.f. 50 s.f. 29 29 25 25 58 s.f.Life Management 1 1,070 s.f. 1,070 s.f. 40 s.f. 27 27 25 25 43 s.f.Auditorium 1 2,462 s.f. 2,462 s.f. 15 s.f. 164 164 25 25 98 s.f.Gymnasium 1 7,650 s.f. 7,650 s.f. 125 s.f. 61 61 25 25 75 75 102 s.f.Wood Shop 1 1,500 s.f. 1,500 s.f. 75 s.f. 20 20 25 25 60 s.f.Science 2 1,034 s.f. 2,068 s.f. 35 s.f. 59 30 25 50 25 50 41 s.f.Computer 3 928 s.f. 2,784 s.f. 25 s.f. 111 37 25 75 37 s.f.Media 1 3,425 s.f. 3,425 s.f. 45 s.f. 76 76 50 50 69 s.f.













Spe

cial

sC

urre

nt G

ener

al C

lass

room

s


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityBrush Creek Elementary

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom

Kindergarten 4 789 s.f. 3,156 s.f. 40 s.f. 79 20 20 80 25 100 32 s.f.


Second 4 740 s.f. 2,960 s.f. 30 s.f. 99 25 23 92 30 120 25 s.f.

Third 4 800 s.f. 3,200 s.f. 30 s.f. 107 27 23 92 30 120 27 s.f.

Fourth 4 740 s.f. 2,960 s.f. 30 s.f. 99 25 25 100 30 120 25 s.f.

Fifth 3 757 s.f. 2,270 s.f. 30 s.f. 76 25 25 75 30 90 25 s.f.



Reading 1 614 s.f. 614 s.f. 100 s.f. 6 2 12 12 51 s.f.Cog. Needs 2 325 s.f. 650 s.f. 100 s.f. 7 2 12 24 27 s.f.Art 1 826 s.f. 826 s.f. 50 s.f. 17 17 25 25 33 s.f.Music 1 816 s.f. 816 s.f. 45 s.f. 18 18 25 25 33 s.f.Gymnasium 1 6,237 s.f. 6,237 s.f. 75 s.f. 83 83 75 75 83 s.f.Computer 1 520 s.f. 520 s.f. 25 s.f. 21 10 30 30 17 s.f.Media 1 3,320 s.f. 3,320 s.f. 45 s.f. 74 74 50 50 66 s.f.


ESL, Cluster (See Definitions) 2 750 s.f. 1,500 s.f. 30 s.f. 50 25 25 50 30 s.f.

Pre-K Pre-K 2 930 s.f. 1,860 s.f. *** s.f. 30 15 15 30 15 30 62 s.f.Total Specials 12,983 s.f. 225 241 35





95% utilization Rate of "Total General Classrooms"








Spec

ials

Cur

rent

Gen

eral

Cla

ssro

oms


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityEagle Valley Elementary

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom



Second 2 800 s.f. 1,600 s.f. 30 s.f. 53 27 23 46 30 60 27 s.f.

Third 2 800 s.f. 1,600 s.f. 30 s.f. 53 27 23 46 30 60 27 s.f.

4th/5th 3 923 s.f. 2,768 s.f. 30 s.f. 92 31 25 75 30 90 31 s.f.

Extra Classroom- Migrant/ Ed Office, Multi-Purpose, Spanish, Gifted 4 718 s.f. 2,872 s.f. 30 s.f. 96 24 23 92 30 120 24 s.f.



Art 1 1,226 s.f. 1,226 s.f. 50 s.f. 25 25 25 25 49 s.f.Music 1 1,226 s.f. 1,226 s.f. 45 s.f. 27 27 25 25 49 s.f.Gymnasium 1 2,327 s.f. 2,327 s.f. 75 s.f. 31 31 75 75 31 s.f.Computer 2 697 s.f. 1,394 s.f. 25 s.f. 56 28 30 60 23 s.f.Media 1 2,300 s.f. 2,300 s.f. 45 s.f. 51 51 50 50 46 s.f.


ESL, Cluster (See Definitions) 2 764 s.f. 1,528 s.f. 30 s.f. 51 25 23 46 30 60 25 s.f.

Pre-K Pre-K(Empty) 2 870 s.f. 1,740 s.f. 55 s.f. 32 16 15 30 15 30 58 s.f.Total Specials 11,741 s.f. 272 325 40













Spe

cial

sC

urre

nt G

ener

al C

lass

room

s


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityEagle Valley High

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom



Programs Included



Spec. Ed 1 550 s.f. 550 s.f. 60 s.f. 9 9 12 12 46 s.f.Technology 3 813 s.f. 2,438 s.f. 30 s.f. 81 27 25 75 25 75 33 s.f.Art 2 1,211 s.f. 2,421 s.f. 50 s.f. 48 24 25 50 25 50 48 s.f.Music 2 1,360 s.f. 2,719 s.f. 50 s.f. 54 27 25 50 25 50 54 s.f.Consumer and Fam. 1 894 s.f. 894 s.f. 40 s.f. 22 22 25 25 25 25 36 s.f.Auditorium 1 3,600 s.f. 3,600 s.f. 8 s.f. 450 450 8 8 450 s.f.Gymnasium 2 10,837 s.f. 21,673 s.f. 125 s.f. 173 87 75 150 144 s.f.Fitness 1 6,971 s.f. 6,971 s.f. 125 s.f. 56 56 25 25 279 s.f.Wood Shop 1 3,270 s.f. 3,270 s.f. 100 s.f. 33 33 25 25 25 25 131 s.f.Science 6 1,110 s.f. 6,662 s.f. 45 s.f. 148 25 25 150 25 150 44 s.f.Computer 3 897 s.f. 2,690 s.f. 25 s.f. 108 36 25 75 36 s.f.Autoshop 1 2,950 s.f. 2,950 s.f. 30 s.f. 98 98 25 25 118 s.f.Media 1 2,240 s.f. 2,240 s.f. 45 s.f. 50 50 50 50 45 s.f.













Spe

cial

sC

urre

nt

Gen

eral

C

lass

room

s


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityEagle Valley Middle

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom

Sixth 3 725 s.f. 2,175 s.f. 32 s.f. 68 23 25 75 30 90 24 s.f.


Eighth 3 722 s.f. 2,167 s.f. 32 s.f. 68 23 25 75 25 75 29 s.f.

Extra Classroom: AP Office 1 705 s.f. 705 s.f. 32 s.f. 22 22 25 25 25 25 28 s.f.


Programs Included (Highlighted)


Program Included

Art 1 1,050 s.f. 1,050 s.f. 50 s.f. 21 21 25 25 42 s.f.Music 1 1,203 s.f. 1,203 s.f. 50 s.f. 24 24 25 25 48 s.f.Fitness 1 1,400 s.f. 1,400 s.f. 125 s.f. 11 11 25 25 56 s.f.Gymnasium 2 10,000 s.f. 20,000 s.f. 125 s.f. 160 80 25 50 75 150 133 s.f.Wood Shop 1 1,010 s.f. 1,010 s.f. 75 s.f. 13 13 25 25 40 s.f.Science 3 720 s.f. 2,160 s.f. 35 s.f. 62 21 25 75 25 75 29 s.f.Computer 3 740 s.f. 2,219 s.f. 25 s.f. 89 30 25 75 30 s.f.Media 1 2,357 s.f. 2,357 s.f. 45 s.f. 52 52 50 50 47 s.f.


ELL, Spec Ed (2) (See Definitions) 3 733 s.f. 2,199 s.f. 30 s.f. 73 Not in Capacity 24 23 69 30 90 24 s.f.









Total All Spaces - Per Maximum Student Count 40770 s.f.

Total Building Square Footage 82000 s.f.

Gym is shared with EVES





Spe

cial

sC

urre

nt G

ener

al C

lass

room

s


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityEdwards Elementary

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom



Second 2 871 s.f. 1,742 s.f. 30 s.f. 58 29 23 46 30 60 29 s.f.

Third 3 870 s.f. 2,611 s.f. 30 s.f. 87 29 23 69 30 90 29 s.f.

Fourth 3 870 s.f. 2,611 s.f. 30 s.f. 87 29 25 75 30 90 29 s.f.

Fifth 2 878 s.f. 1,756 s.f. 30 s.f. 59 29 25 50 30 60 29 s.f.

Empty 2 867 s.f. 1,733 s.f. 30 s.f. 58 29 23 46 30 60 29 s.f.



Cog. Needs/ Conf. 1 821 s.f. 821 s.f. 50 s.f. 16 16 12 12 68 s.f.Small Group 1 800 s.f. 800 s.f. 50 s.f. 16 16 12 12 67 s.f.Art 1 751 s.f. 751 s.f. 50 s.f. 15 15 25 25 30 s.f.Music 1 905 s.f. 905 s.f. 45 s.f. 20 20 25 25 36 s.f.Gymnasium 1 4,070 s.f. 4,070 s.f. 75 s.f. 54 54 75 75 54 s.f.Computer 2 622 s.f. 1,244 s.f. 25 s.f. 50 25 30 60 21 s.f.Media 1 1,882 s.f. 1,882 s.f. 45 s.f. 42 42 50 50 38 s.f.


ESL, Cluster, Title 1 (Located in non-general classrooms) 0 0 s.f. 0 s.f. 30 s.f. 0 0 50 0 0 s.f.

Pre-K Pre-K(Empty) 2 744 s.f. 1,488 s.f. 55 s.f. 27 14 15 30 15 30 50 s.f.Total Specials 11,961 s.f. 240 289 45












Spe

cial

sC

urre

nt G

ener

al C

lass

room

s


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityGyspum Creek Middle

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom

Sixth 6 830 s.f. 4,980 s.f. 32 s.f. 156 26 25 150 30 180 28 s.f.


Eighth 5 786 s.f. 3,930 s.f. 32 s.f. 123 25 25 125 25 125 31 s.f.




Program Included

Spec. Ed 2 766 s.f. 1,532 s.f. 60 s.f. 26 13 12 24 64 s.f.Art 1 1,244 s.f. 1,244 s.f. 50 s.f. 25 25 25 25 50 s.f.Music 1 1,350 s.f. 1,350 s.f. 50 s.f. 27 27 25 25 54 s.f.Auditorium 1 2,100 s.f. 2,100 s.f. 15 s.f. 140 140 25 25 84 s.f.Gymnasium 1 7,300 s.f. 7,300 s.f. 125 s.f. 58 58 25 25 75 75 97 s.f.Wood Shop 1 1,475 s.f. 1,475 s.f. 75 s.f. 20 20 25 25 59 s.f.Science 2 1,082 s.f. 2,164 s.f. 35 s.f. 62 31 25 50 25 50 43 s.f.Computer 3 900 s.f. 2,700 s.f. 25 s.f. 108 36 25 75 36 s.f.Media 1 3,400 s.f. 3,400 s.f. 45 s.f. 76 76 50 50 68 s.f.


ESL (See Definitions) 1 855 s.f. 855 s.f. 32 s.f. 27 Not in Capacity 27 25 25 34 s.f.














Spe

cial

sC

urre

nt G

ener

al C

lass

room

s


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityGypsum Elementary

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom



Second 3 863 s.f. 2,590 s.f. 30 s.f. 86 29 23 69 30 90 29 s.f.

Third 2 870 s.f. 1,740 s.f. 30 s.f. 58 29 23 46 30 60 29 s.f.

Fourth 2 870 s.f. 1,740 s.f. 30 s.f. 58 29 25 50 30 60 29 s.f.

Fifth 2 870 s.f. 1,740 s.f. 30 s.f. 58 29 25 50 30 60 29 s.f.

Extra Classrooms: Breakout 2 870 s.f. 1,740 s.f. 30 s.f. 58 29 23 46 30 60 29 s.f.

Total General Classrooms 18 865 s.f. 15,530 s.f. 33 s.f. 468 27 401 505 30 s.f. EX. Capacity 550Title 1, ELA, SLA, Cluster 5 371 s.f. 1,856 s.f. 30 s.f. 62 12 23 115 30 150 12 s.f.Break Room, Couns. 2 480 s.f. 960 s.f. 30 s.f. 32 16 23 46 30 60 16 s.f.Cog. Needs 1 480 s.f. 480 s.f. 50 s.f. 10 10 12 12 40 s.f.Art 1 775 s.f. 775 s.f. 50 s.f. 16 16 25 25 31 s.f.Music 1 800 s.f. 800 s.f. 45 s.f. 18 18 25 25 32 s.f.Gymnasium 1 3,960 s.f. 3,960 s.f. 75 s.f. 53 53 75 75 53 s.f.Computer 2 622 s.f. 1,244 s.f. 25 s.f. 50 25 30 60 21 s.f.Media 1 1,580 s.f. 1,580 s.f. 45 s.f. 35 35 50 50 32 s.f.


ESL, Cluster, Title 1 (Located in non-general classrooms) 0 0 s.f. 0 s.f. 30 s.f. 0 0 50 0 0 s.f.

Pre-K Pre-K(Empty) 2 656 s.f. 1,312 s.f. *** s.f. 32 16 15 30 15 30 44 s.f.Total Specials 12,967 s.f. 306 487 31


Stressed Capacity 505 ****










Spec

ials

Cur

rent

Gen

eral

Cla

ssro

oms


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityJune Creek Elementary

All Classrooms

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom



Second 3 768 s.f. 2,304 s.f. 30 s.f. 77 26 23 69 30 90 26 s.f.

Third 3 768 s.f. 2,304 s.f. 30 s.f. 77 26 23 69 30 90 26 s.f.

Fourth 2 768 s.f. 1,536 s.f. 30 s.f. 51 26 25 50 30 60 26 s.f.

Fifth 2 790 s.f. 1,580 s.f. 30 s.f. 53 26 25 50 30 60 26 s.f.

Extra Classrooms: ELA 1 768 s.f. 768 s.f. 30 s.f. 26 26 23 23 30 30 26 s.f.Total General Classrooms Available 17 785 s.f. 13,481 s.f. 33 s.f. 408 24 381 480 28 s.f. EX. Capacity 500


Cog. Needs 4 731 s.f. 2,922 s.f. 100 s.f. 29 10 12 48 61 s.f.Art 1 826 s.f. 826 s.f. 50 s.f. 17 17 25 25 33 s.f.Music 1 816 s.f. 816 s.f. 45 s.f. 18 18 25 25 33 s.f.Gymnasium 1 6,237 s.f. 6,237 s.f. 75 s.f. 83 83 75 75 83 s.f.Computer 2 981 s.f. 1,961 s.f. 25 s.f. 78 39 30 60 33 s.f.Media 1 3,320 s.f. 3,320 s.f. 45 s.f. 74 74 50 50 66 s.f.


ELA, Title 1, Cluster (See Definitions) 3 768 s.f. 2,304 s.f. 30 s.f. 77 26 23 69 30 90 26 s.f.

Pre-K Pre-K 2 988 s.f. 1,976 s.f. *** s.f. 30 15 15 30 15 30 66 s.f.Infant Care (in Kindergarten room) 1 895 s.f. 895 s.f. 40 s.f. 22 22 15 15 15 15 60 s.f.

Total Specials 21,257 s.f. 428 418 77













Spe

cial

sC

urre

nt G

ener

al C

lass

room

s A

vaila

ble


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityHomestake Peak PK-8

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom


First 2 750 s.f. 1,500 s.f. 40 s.f. 38 19 20 40 25 50 30 s.f.

Second 2 807 s.f. 1,614 s.f. 30 s.f. 54 27 23 46 30 60 27 s.f.

Third 3 714 s.f. 2,141 s.f. 30 s.f. 71 24 23 69 30 90 24 s.f.

Fourth 2 732 s.f. 1,463 s.f. 30 s.f. 49 24 23 46 30 60 24 s.f.

Fifth 2 704 s.f. 1,408 s.f. 30 s.f. 47 23 23 46 30 60 23 s.f.

Sixth 3 767 s.f. 2,300 s.f. 32 s.f. 72 24 25 75 30 90 26 s.f.


Eighth 2 730 s.f. 1,460 s.f. 32 s.f. 46 23 25 50 25 50 29 s.f.

Extra Classrooms: Spanish, Upper ESL, Gifted, Counseling 4 771 s.f. 3,083 s.f. 32 s.f. 96 24 25 100 25 100 31 s.f.




Program Included

Professional Deve. 1 980 s.f. 980 s.f. 60 s.f. 16 16 12 12 82 s.f.Spec. Ed 2 524 s.f. 1,048 s.f. 60 s.f. 17 9 12 24 44 s.f.Art 2 760 s.f. 1,520 s.f. 50 s.f. 30 15 25 50 30 s.f.Music 1 800 s.f. 800 s.f. 50 s.f. 16 16 25 25 32 s.f.Fitness/Weights 1 1,856 s.f. 1,856 s.f. 125 s.f. 15 15 25 25 74 s.f.Gymnasium 2 8,427 s.f. 16,854 s.f. 125 s.f. 135 67 25 50 75 150 112 s.f.Wood Shop 1 2,100 s.f. 2,100 s.f. 75 s.f. 28 28 25 25 84 s.f.Auditorium 1 3,600 s.f. 3,600 s.f. 8 s.f. 450 450 10 10 360 s.f.Science 2 849 s.f. 1,697 s.f. 35 s.f. 48 24 25 50 25 50 34 s.f.Computer 2 701 s.f. 1,401 s.f. 25 s.f. 56 28 25 50 28 s.f.Media 1 3,046 s.f. 3,046 s.f. 45 s.f. 68 68 50 50 61 s.f.


ESL, Cluster (See Definitions) 2 755 s.f. 1,510 s.f. 30 s.f. 50 Not in Capacity 25 23 46 30 60 25 s.f.

Pre-K Pre-K 2 466 s.f. 932 s.f. *** s.f. 30 15 15 30 15 30 31 s.f.Total Specials 37,344 s.f. 183 100 200 77

687



Stressed Capacity 885 ****





Total All Spaces - Per Maximum Student Count 56269 s.f.

Total Building Square Footage 122553 s.f.

Gym is shared with EVES





Spe

cial

sC

urre

nt G

ener

al C

lass

room

s


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityRed Canyon - East

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom


Science 2 300 s.f. 600 s.f. 45 s.f. 13 7 25 50 25 50 12 s.f.

Computer 1 533 s.f. 533 s.f. 25 s.f. 21 21 25 25 25 25 21 s.f.

Total General Classrooms 7 401 s.f. 2,607 s.f. 34 s.f. 81 13 175 175 16 s.f. EX. Capacity -

Programs Included



Commons 1 1,300 s.f. 1,300 s.f. 75 s.f. 17 17 25 25 25 25 52 s.f.Total Specials 1,300 s.f. 17 25 25 4

200Stressed Capacity 98










** Suggested Square Footages have been derived from a number of sources and vary from 25-50 which also depend on grade level.

Spe

cial

sG

ener

al C

lass

room

s


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityRed Hill Elementary

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom



Second 3 731 s.f. 2,192 s.f. 30 s.f. 73 24 23 69 30 90 24 s.f.

Third 3 771 s.f. 2,314 s.f. 30 s.f. 77 26 23 69 30 90 26 s.f.

Fourth 3 735 s.f. 2,206 s.f. 30 s.f. 74 25 25 75 30 90 25 s.f.

Fifth 3 749 s.f. 2,248 s.f. 30 s.f. 75 25 25 75 30 90 25 s.f.

Empty 1 768 s.f. 768 s.f. 30 s.f. 26 26 25 25 30 30 26 s.f.

Total General Classrooms 18 766 s.f. 0 s.f. 33 s.f. 424 24 413 515 27 s.f. EX. Capacity 450


Gifted, Cluster, ELA 3 652 s.f. 1,956 s.f. 30 s.f. 65 22 23 69 30 90 22 s.f.Counseling 1 278 s.f. 278 s.f. 100 s.f. 3 1Cog. Needs 2 442 s.f. 883 s.f. 100 s.f. 9 3 12 24 37 s.f.Art 1 826 s.f. 826 s.f. 50 s.f. 17 17 25 25 33 s.f.Music 1 816 s.f. 816 s.f. 45 s.f. 18 18 25 25 33 s.f.Gymnasium 1 6,237 s.f. 6,237 s.f. 75 s.f. 83 83 75 75 83 s.f.Computer 2 1,007 s.f. 2,013 s.f. 25 s.f. 81 40 30 60 34 s.f.Media 1 3,320 s.f. 3,320 s.f. 45 s.f. 74 74 50 50 66 s.f.


ELA (See Definitions) 1 760 s.f. 760 s.f. 30 s.f. 25 25 23 23 30 30 25

Pre-K Pre-K 1 885 s.f. 885 s.f. 55 s.f. 16 16 23 23 30 30 30 s.f.Total Specials 17,089 s.f. 374 379 42



Stressed Capacity 515 ***










Spe

cial

sC

urre

nt G

ener

al C

lass

room

s


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityRed Sandstone Elementary

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom

Kindergarten 2 1,142 s.f. 2,284 s.f. 40 s.f. 57 29 20 40 25 50 46 s.f.


Second 2 640 s.f. 1,280 s.f. 30 s.f. 43 21 23 46 30 60 21 s.f.

Third 2 640 s.f. 1,280 s.f. 30 s.f. 43 21 23 46 30 60 21 s.f.

Fourth 2 640 s.f. 1,280 s.f. 30 s.f. 43 21 25 50 30 60 21 s.f.

Fifth 2 640 s.f. 1,280 s.f. 30 s.f. 43 21 25 50 30 60 21 s.f.



Art 1 790 s.f. 790 s.f. 50 s.f. 16 16 25 25 32 s.f.Music 1 640 s.f. 640 s.f. 45 s.f. 14 14 25 25 26 s.f.Multi-Purpose 1 790 s.f. 790 s.f. 50 s.f. 16 16 25 25 32 s.f.Gymnasium 1 6,252 s.f. 6,252 s.f. 75 s.f. 83 83 75 75 83 s.f.Computer 2 640 s.f. 1,280 s.f. 25 s.f. 51 26 30 60 21 s.f.Media 1 1,600 s.f. 1,600 s.f. 45 s.f. 36 36 50 50 32 s.f.


ELA (See Definitions) 1 640 s.f. 640 s.f. 30 s.f. 21 21 23 23 30 30 21 s.f.

Pre-K Pre-K 2 560 s.f. 1,120 s.f. 55 s.f. 20 10 15 30 15 30 37 s.f.Total Specials 13,112 s.f. 258 320 36













Spec

ials

Cur

rent

Gen

eral

Cla

ssro

oms


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityVail Ski Snowboard Academy

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom

Fifth 2 685 s.f. 1,370 s.f. 30 s.f. 46 23 25 50 30 60 23 s.f.

Sixth-Eighth 10 630 s.f. 6,300 s.f. 32 s.f. 197 20 25 250 30 300 21 s.f.


Programs Included


Program Included

Computer 1 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 60 s.f. 17 17 12 12 83 s.f.Art 1 1,550 s.f. 1,550 s.f. 30 s.f. 52 52 25 25 62 s.f.Media 1 2,760 s.f. 2,760 s.f. 50 s.f. 55 55 25 25 110 s.f.Music 1 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 50 s.f. 20 20 25 25 40 s.f.Wood Shop 1 1,450 s.f. 1,450 s.f. 40 s.f. 36 36 25 25 58 s.f.Extra 1 1,800 s.f. 1,800 s.f. 30 s.f. 60 60 25 25 72 s.f.Gymnasium 1 7,200 s.f. 7,200 s.f. 125 s.f. 58 58 25 25 75 75 96 s.f.Science 2 2,367 s.f. 4,734 s.f. 35 s.f. 135 68 25 50 25 50 95 s.f.













Spe

cial

sC

urre

nt G

ener

al

Cla

ssro

oms


TAB Associates, Inc. School CapacityRed Canyon - West

1/28/2016













Maximum Class Sizes

Classroom


Science 1 400 s.f. 400 s.f. 45 s.f. 9 9 25 25 25 25 16 s.f.

Computer 1 352 s.f. 352 s.f. 25 s.f. 14 14 25 25 25 25 14 s.f.

Total General Classrooms 7 1,216 s.f. 3,072 s.f. 102 s.f. 95 37 175 175 49 s.f. EX. Capacity -

Programs Included



N/A 0 0 s.f. 0 s.f. 0 s.f. 0 0 25 0 25 0 0 s.f.Total Specials 0 s.f. 0 0 0 0

175Stressed Capacity 95











Spe

cial

sG

ener

al C

lass

room

s


Eagle County School District Facilities Energy Assessment

Presented by Joel Asrael Ameresco Inc. 10650 E. Bethany Drive Suite A Aurora, CO 80014

This Proposal contains data and information that has been submitted in response to a request for proposal or similar solicitation and is provided in confidence. The contents

include proprietary information and trade secrets that belong to Ameresco, Inc., (“Confidential Information”) and is disclosed to the recipient only for purposes of evaluation. In

the event Ameresco is awarded a contract or purchase order as a result of or in connection with the submission of this proposal, Customer shall have a limited right as set forth

in the governing contract or purchase order to disclose the data herein, but only to the extent expressly allowed. This restriction does not limit the Customer’s right to use or

disclose data obtained without restriction from any source, including the proposer.

May 5, 2015

September, 2015

Facilities Energy Assessment

Facilities Energy Assessment “Page content is subject to Confidentiality Restrictions”

Eagle County School District September 11, 2015 Page ii

This page is intentionally left blank.



Eagle County School District September 11, 2015 Page i

Table of Contents

1. Assessment Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 3

Facilities Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 3

2. Utility Bill Analysis (UBA) ....................................................................................................................................... 5

Utility Cost Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 7

Energy Use Intensity ................................................................................................................................................. 9

Utility Bill Analysis Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 10

3. Potential Measures ................................................................................................................................................... 11

Lighting...................................................................................................................................................................... 12

HVAC ........................................................................................................................................................................ 13

Water .......................................................................................................................................................................... 18

Domestic Hot Water ............................................................................................................................................... 19

Plug Load .................................................................................................................................................................. 20

Envelope ................................................................................................................................................................... 20

Kitchen ...................................................................................................................................................................... 21

Other .......................................................................................................................................................................... 22

4. Financials ................................................................................................................................................................... 23

5. Energy Project Delivery .......................................................................................................................................... 24

Delivery Alternatives ............................................................................................................................................... 24

Development Approach ......................................................................................................................................... 25

Development and Design Process ........................................................................................................................ 26

Construction ............................................................................................................................................................. 27

Closeout ..................................................................................................................................................................... 28

6. About Ameresco ...................................................................................................................................................... 30



Eagle County School District September 11, 2015 Page 3

1. Assessment Overview

As a result of a successful bond election in 2006, Ameresco, operating through Ennovate Corporation, assisted Eagle County School District with implementation of several energy conservation measures in District facilities which resulted in substantial improvements in energy efficiency improvements and an approximately 30% reduction in utility bills. As the District considers another bond issue in 2016, Ameresco has volunteered to assist the District in developing budgetary estimates and associated savings for additional measures to further improve building performance and reduce energy waste. The results of this preliminary assessment are contained in this report.

Facilities Summary This evaluation addressed the District’s 19 primary facilities, totaling 1,300,207 sf of space. For this report, Eagle Valley Elementary and Middle Schools have not been included as they are not expected to be included in any substantial future improvement efforts.

Electricity is provided by Holy Cross Energy and Xcel Energy, Gas is provided by Source Gas, AM Gas, and Xcel Energy, and water is provided by Town of Eagle, Town of Gypsum, and Eagle River Water & Sanitation District. The school district’s facilities, year build, and size are provided in the below table.




Facilities Assessed

Facility Name Abbr Year Built GSF Comments

Eagle Valley Elementary School EVES 1973 62,339 Not included in UBA Gypsum Elementary School GES 1992 55,000 Red Sandstone Elementary School RSES 1977 45,537 Edwards Elementary School EES 1991 55,000 Avon Elementary School AES 1996 67,780 Red Hill Elementary School RHES 2001 65,343 Brush Creek Elementary School BCES 2001 67,043 June Creek Elementary School JCES 2009 74,000 Eagle Valley Middle School EVMS 1979 73,779 Not included in UBA Gypsum Creek Middle School GCMS 2001 81,590 Berry Creek Middle School BCMS 1995 80,552 Red Canyon High School RCHS 2007 5,700 Eagle Valley High School EVHS 1964 155,147 Renovated in 2008 Battle Mountain High School BMHS 2008 209,000 Homestake Peak School HPS 1972 119,159 Renovated in 2010 Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy VSSA 1977 53,758 District Office DO N/A 6,640 Technology/West Bus Barn WBB N/A 12,500 East Bus Barn/Food Service Warehouse EBB N/A 10,340 Total 1,300,207

Note: The Eagle Valley High School Addition and maintenance shop is not broken out separately in the analysis, but will be referred to as the EV-Add in latter sections of the report, and is assumed to be 45,250 sf.




2. Utility Bill Analysis (UBA)

Eagle Valley School District has 29 accounts with Holy Cross, 8 accounts with Xcel, 16 accounts with Source Gas, 9 accounts with AM Gas, 10 accounts with Town of Eagle, 4 accounts with Town of Gypsum, 9 accounts with Eagle Water and Sanitation. For this report, smaller facilities and accounts with minimal usage have not been included. In the table below, all accounts have been listed and those included in this report have been identified.

Utilities Account # Utility Provided Location Included in

UBA Holy Cross 110023501 Electricity Eagle Valley ES

Source Gas/AM Gas 1101260470 Natural Gas Eagle Valley ES Town of Eagle 11650 Water Eagle Valley ES Town of Eagle 10550 Water Eagle Valley ES Town of Eagle 10150 Water Eagle Valley ES

Holy Cross 213513600 Electricity Gypsum ES X Source Gas 1101566038 Natural Gas Gypsum ES X

Town of Gypsum 7220 Water Gypsum ES X Holy Cross 340002901 Electricity Red Sandstone ES X

Xcel Energy/AM Gas A807989 Natural Gas Red Sandstone ES X Eagle River WSD 883700 Water Red Sandstone ES X

Holy Cross 454527700 Electricity Edwards ES X Source Gas 1101566062 Natural Gas Edwards ES X

Eagle River WSD 257000 Water Edwards ES X Holy Cross 500048802 Electricity Avon ES X

Xcel Energy/AM Gas C1107245 Natural Gas Avon ES X Eagle River WSD 10195 Water Avon ES X

Holy Cross 500917801 Electricity Red Hill ES X Source Gas 1101566070 Natural Gas Red Hill ES X

Town of Gypsum 15660 Water Red Hill ES X Holy Cross 500949301 Electricity Brush Creek ES X Source Gas 1101565984 Natural Gas Brush Creek ES X

Town of Eagle 77000 Water Brush Creek ES X Town of Eagle 77050 Water Brush Creek ES X

Holy Cross 503053900 Electricity June Creek ES X Source Gas 1101423570 Natural Gas June Creek ES X

Eagle River WSD 250018 Water June Creek ES X Holy Cross 110023900 Electricity Eagle Valley MS Holy Cross 500192700 Electricity Eagle Valley MS Source Gas 1101565992 Natural Gas Eagle Valley MS

Town of Eagle 80850 Water Eagle Valley MS Town of Eagle 16000 Water Eagle Valley MS

Holy Cross 500919001 Electricity Gypsum Creek MS X Source Gas 1101566066 Natural Gas Gypsum Creek MS X

Town of Gypsum 15650 Water Gypsum Creek MS X Holy Cross 500021103 Electricity Berry Creek MS X

Source Gas/AM Gas 1101331801 Natural Gas Berry Creek MS X Eagle River WSD 250009 Water Berry Creek MS X

Holy Cross 110502902 Electricity Red Canyon HS X Holy Cross 503006501 Electricity Red Canyon HS Source Gas 1101400302 Natural Gas Red Canyon HS X

Town of Eagle 32250 Water Red Canyon HS X Holy Cross 215006501 Electricity Eagle Valley HS X

Source Gas/AM Gas 1101260792 Natural Gas Eagle Valley HS X Source Gas/AM Gas 1101260795 Natural Gas Eagle Valley HS X




Source Gas 1101565999 Natural Gas Eagle Valley HS X Town of Gypsum 1150 Water Eagle Valley HS X

Holy Cross 502758900 Electricity Battle Mountain HS X Holy Cross 503033101 Electricity Battle Mountain HS X Source Gas 1201008581 Natural Gas Battle Mountain HS X

Source Gas/AM Gas Missing Natural Gas Battle Mountain HS X Eagle River WSD 170006 Water Battle Mountain HS X

Holy Cross 451016401 Electricity Homestake Peak Schl X Holy Cross 459106400 Electricity Homestake Peak Schl

Xcel Energy/AM Gas C1252609 Natural Gas Homestake Peak Schl X Xcel Energy 5312282276-300073208 Natural Gas Homestake Peak Schl X

Eagle River WSD 333550 Water Homestake Peak Schl X Xcel Energy 531256576 Electricity Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy X Xcel Energy 5336741443 Electricity Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy X

Xcel Energy/AM Gas A430915 Natural Gas Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy X Eagle River WSD 75600 Water Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy X

Holy Cross 500075503 Electricity District Office X Source Gas 1101582882 Natural Gas District Office X

Town of Eagle 58001 Water District Office X Holy Cross 110006900 Electricity Technology/West Bus Barn X Holy Cross 110022100 Electricity Technology/West Bus Barn X Source Gas 1101565988 Natural Gas Technology/West Bus Barn X

Town of Eagle 13850 Water Technology/West Bus Barn X Holy Cross 503170000 Electricity East Bus Barn/Food Service Warehouse X Holy Cross 451016300 Electricity East Bus Barn/Food Service Warehouse X Xcel Energy 5312282276-300073207 Natural Gas East Bus Barn/Food Service Warehouse X




Utility Cost Summary As indicated in the table and chart below, Eagle County School District has an annual utility cost of over $1,335,310. The majority of costs is for electricity (55%), which is typical for schools in Colorado.

Facility Elec Natural

Gas Water Total

Gypsum ES $36,546 $27,877 $6,119 $70,542 Red Sandstone ES $23,471 $11,591 $15,634 $50,696 Edward ES $30,237 $18,790 $8,141 $57,168 Avon ES $42,718 $12,421 $13,409 $68,548 Red Hill ES $38,911 $25,363 $6,119 $70,393 Brush Creek ES $33,991 $23,180 $3,128 $60,299 June Creek ES $27,736 $21,984 $16,677 $66,396 Gypsum Creek MS $53,516 $26,745 $6,994 $87,255 Berry Creek MS $45,779 $34,287 $8,162 $88,228 Red Canyon HS $3,451 $4,779 $1,626 $9,856 Eagle Valley HS $119,654 $69,529 $11,365 $200,548 Battle Mountain HS $118,286 $68,627 $30,374 $217,287 Homestake Peak School $69,293 $36,047 $38,323 $143,663 Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy $28,851 $17,280 $15,466 $61,596 District Office $9,496 $2,815 $2,526 $14,836 Technology/West Bus Barn $27,336 $9,852 $5,095 $42,283 E Bus Barn/Food Service Warehouse $20,690 $5,024 $0 $25,714 Total $729,961 $416,191 $189,158 $1,335,310




The cost per square foot for each utility is a strong indicator of how efficiently each is being used. Electric, natural gas, water and their combined total cost per square foot by building is provided in the table below.

The cost of energy, per square foot is highest at RCHS, DO, and the two facilities with the bus barns. These facilities should be priorities for further investigation for opportunities to reduce cost.




Energy Use Intensity The energy use intensity (EUI) of a building is equal to its total energy usage in thousands of British Thermal Units (kBTU) divided by its square footage. This measurement can provide a good picture of an individual building’s energy efficiency. The EUI for an energy efficient schools in Colorado is approximately 35 kBTU/sqft. In the below table, the EUI for these building is compared to EUI values from 2006 and 2011 (where available).

This data provides several insights worth noting; the 30% reduction in energy use, realized from capital upgrades implemented in 2007-2009, are generally being maintained. And in most cases, energy savings has improved since the 2011 evaluation. For the buildings where data is available, overall energy use has decreased another 7% since 2011.

There are some exceptions to the continued trend in reduced energy use, specifically Red Sandstone ES, Brush Creek ES, Berry Creek MS and Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy have all increase energy use since 2011. These schools should be investigated further to understand the increase in use and determine the actions needed to stop this backslide.

Using the 2011 portfolio (comparing only 2011 and 2015 data) energy use has dropped by 7% but cost have only dropped by 3%. This suggests a rate increase of 10% over the last 4 years (or 2.5% annually). This also demonstrates that success of the energy program in that the increase in total energy cost have been tempered even with the escalation in fuel costs.




Utility Bill Analysis Conclusion The Utility Bill analysis is only the first step in a complete evaluation of the utility use and savings opportunities at your facilities. These findings are indicators of possible issues that will help direct further investigation.

Our analysis has uncovered several potential issues that warrant further investigation, including:

• Prior efforts to improve District energy performance have resulted in cost and use reductions of approximately 35%.

• Overall, the District staff has done a good job in maintaining savings from past conservation efforts. • Opportunities exist to further reduce energy use at several of the facilities. • Because of the high cost of electricity and natural gas, alternate energy solutions should also be

investigated.




3. Potential Measures Below is the list of potential Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) identified during site visits conducted between July 1 and July 8, 2015. Applicable measures have been identified by location in the table as “yes” if they should be considered for the respective facility. These measures represent high-level opportunities to reduce utility cost at the District facilities. Ameresco would work with the District to further identify specific applicable measures and to ascertain whether there are additional options to consider based on the priorities of the District.

The descriptions that follow describe each of the conservation measures in more detail.

# Conservation Measures AES

BCES

EES

EV-A

dd

GES

HPES

JCES

RHES

RSES

BCM

S

GCM

S

VSSA

BMHS

EVHS

RCHS

DO WBB

EBB

1.00 Lighting1.01 Retroift Interior Lighting Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes1.02 Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes1.03 Install Lighting Controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes2.00 HVAC2.01 Optimize Control System Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes2.02 Install Variable Speed HW Pumping Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2.03 Install VAV System Yes 2.04 Install Destratification Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2.05 Replace Aging HVAC systems Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2.06 Install Used Oil Furnace Yes Yes2.07 Install Radiant Gas Heaters Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2.08 Install Independent Heating Unit for Kitchen Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 2.09 Improve Ventilation Yes Yes 3.00 Water3.01 Install new high efficiency water fixture Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes3.02 Optimize Irrigation Controls Yes Yes 4.00 Domestic Hot Water4.01 Upgrade Domestic Hot Water System Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5.00 Plug Load5.02 Install Controls for heat tape Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6.00 Envelope6.01 Replace/Renovate Windows Yes Yes Yes 6.02 Insulate and Seal Building Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes7.00 Kitchen7.01 Optimize Walk-In Coolers Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7.02 Optimize Ice Maker Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7.03 Install Air Curtin for Kitchen Door Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8.00 Other8.01 Install Renewables Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes8.02 Acquire Lifts for each building Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8.03 Optimize Fleet Yes Yes




Lighting Retrofit Interior Lighting The School District is currently using T-8 fluorescent fixtures as the primary lighting source. Ameresco has successfully upgraded fluorescent lighting to LED lighting at numerous facilities. This retrofit leads to dramatic reductions in energy use and improved light quality. Ameresco will perform a full room by room audit to determine the best lighting solution. This measure will provide an optimized solution that could include:

Replacement of HID or fluorescent fixtures with LED fixtures Retrofit of existing fluorescent fixtures with LED lamps and ballasts Installation of reflectors where appropriate De-lamping of fixtures where appropriate Retrofit of exit signs to LED fixtures Cleaning of dirty fixture lenses during retrofits Replacement of broken lenses as necessary Providing a spare lamp inventory for future use

Retrofit Outdoor Lighting Presently, the District is using a mix of technology for outdoor lighting around the buildings and in the parking lots. This measure would include a retrofit of existing fixtures with new high efficiency LED lighting, improving visibility and reducing operation costs. Install Lighting Controls There are many rooms in the school buildings that are not continuously occupied during the day. By installing

occupancy sensors, lights can be automatically turned off when not in use. Additionally, daylight harvesting sensors will be considered in areas where adequate natural lighting is available. Ameresco will include an evaluation of each room’s use and determine if a sensor would be effective in each respective space. Many school districts that have shut off security lighting around their

schools, have found that their vandalism problems did not subsequently increase; in most cases, they actually decreased appreciably after the lighting was turned off. This result would not happen in every instance where "security lighting" was in use, but it does point out the fact that light, or its absence, is not the only factor in determining the likelihood of crime. Sometimes it is not even one of the more important factors.




Presently outdoor lighting at your facilities is controlled with dedicated photocells. By combining this with scheduling controls to turn lights off during specific hours, additional savings can be realized without sacrificing safety.

HVAC Optimize Control System Re-commissioning Based on the utility bill comparison between 2011 and 2015 data, four school have significantly increased energy use (BCES, RSES, BCMS, and VSSA). This suggests that a re-commissioning effort could likely bring the energy use back in line with 2011 use. There are many opportunities to fine-tune your building’s HVAC control systems which will save energy without sacrificing occupant comfort or equipment reliability, and at the same time, prolong equipment life. Through re-commissioning, you can often employ simple measures to capture opportunities for significant energy savings. Ameresco will work with your site personnel to balance and optimize these systems. Through a re-commissioning process, we will evaluate and recommend including additional control strategies to further reduce energy use. Install/Upgrade HVAC DDC Controls Specifically for RCHS, DO, WBB, and EBB, Ameresco will investigate replacing the stand alone control system with Direct Digital Controls (DDC). This upgrade will allow not only more specialized control but energy management and system diagnostic functions in the environment of a centralized computer network.

Additionally, this upgrade can help make the facility function more efficiently when the gathered data are compiled into useful, pertinent reports. Quality-control, production, research, and maintenance will all benefit from the increased information flow when it is properly managed. Re-commissioning and the upgrade of controls will change how the systems function and possibly include new conservation strategies. Lastly, enhanced controls can

improve the air quality in a building, providing an improved working and learning environment.




A list of control strategies are provided below, each of which will be considered for application during the development of a project. Equipment Scheduling/Setback: By utilizing an hour calendar to turn equipment on/off based on time of day, day of week, holidays and outdoor air conditions, equipment can be programmed to operate in an unoccupied mode. During unoccupied periods, supply and return fans can be turned off, outdoor air dampers closed and temperatures set back, thus reducing energy usage.

Optimized Start: When an HVAC system is turned back to occupied mode, the building air must be returned to operating temperature as quickly as possible. This can be done by setting a specific timed start-up with an optimized sequence, or an optimum start algorithm can be used to anticipate the latest time to turn the system back on. Ameresco will work with you to determine the best option for each building.

Lockouts: This is programming designed to ensure that equipment doesn’t turn on unless required.

Demand Controlled Ventilation (DCV): Fresh, outside air is needed for proper indoor air quality. However, the amount required depends on the number of occupants at any given time. Typical systems use a fixed amount of ventilation air, which is sized for the maximum number of occupants. Conditioning this amount of air is energy intensive. DCV provides only the precise amount of fresh air needed at any given time, thereby reducing energy use. A sensor will monitor the level of CO2 and adjust the amount of ventilation accordingly.

Exhaust Fan Controls: Some exhaust fans appear to be operating constantly. This uses excess electricity and causes an unnecessary load on the HVAC system that provides the conditioned make-up air to these rooms. Exhaust fans will be interlocked with lighting occupancy sensors or placed on schedules to only operate when occupied.




Supply Air Temperature Reset: This strategy resets the supply air temperature (SAT) set point for a variable air volume (VAV) air handling unit. The intent of the control strategy is to adjust the discharge air temperature up and down in order to more effectively satisfy actual loads within the spaces. This control strategy has the potential to minimize the heating, cooling, and pumping energy associated with the conditioned air delivered to each zone during less-than-designed operating conditions.

Duct Pressure Reductions: For VAV systems, there is an opportunity to reduce duct static pressure settings and thereby reduce the amount of fan energy being used. One way to do this is to implement a critical zone reset. The static pressure set point is continually adjusted (reset) so that at least one terminal unit in the system—the terminal unit serving the critical zone - is wide open. Another method is to simply reduce the set point during unoccupied modes.

Reduce Min Air Flow in VAV: Often the minimum airflow set point of a VAV box is designed for worst case scenarios. Because the use of space changes or occupancy never reaches maximum designed levels, energy is often wasted in ventilating the space. Ameresco recommends investigating if the ventilation rates in each VAV box is appropriate and making adjustments as needed. Economizer: Economizing provides free cooling any time the outdoor temperature is below the required system supply temperature. The outdoor air damper modulates to the 100% outdoor air position as the outdoor air temperature approaches the required supply air temperature. Boiler Temperature Reset: The temperature of water being delivered by boilers can often be reset based on outdoor air temperature to optimize the efficiency of these systems. When outdoor temperatures are mild, but indoor space still requires conditioning, the boiler water temperature can be reduced and still meet the conditioning loads of the buildings. Lighting: Integrating the lighting controls into the building automation system can provide additional opportunities to reduce lighting energy use during unoccupied times. Load Sheading: For buildings were the electrical utility rate has a significant demand rate, load sheading can reduce this cost buy automatically shutting off non-critical equipment during times of peak demand. Occupancy Controls for HVAC & Lighting: These controls will turn the fans off when the room is unoccupied. If all rooms on a single fan system are unoccupied, the affected fan will turn off. This will also be tied in with the lights so that lights will not stay lit when the room is unoccupied.




Install Variable Speed Hot Water Pumping Presently, the hot water circulation pumps operate at constant speed. Replacing the existing pumps and motors with new, premium-efficiency units along with installation of variable speed drives will allow the pumps to modulate the flow of water based upon building demand, thus increasing/decreasing the electricity consumption of the pump motor, while precisely matching the demand of the facility. Many existing electric motors have low efficiency ratings and low power factors. Replacing them with premium efficiency motors will allow the pumps to run much cooler, prolonging motor life. Install VAV System

The District Office is presently conditioned by four constant volume residential stile DX/Furnace units. This system is poorly suited for the present use of the building, leading to unbalanced conditioning and uncomfortable working conditions. This measure would include installing new duct work and heating and cooling to provide a variable air volume system that can provide more precise conditioning and reduce the energy used to condition the building.

Install Destratification

Building spaces with high ceilings experience temperature stratification with hot air rising and stagnating at the top of the room. This is especially true during the heating season when the air temperature at the ceiling is several degrees higher than the air temperature at floor level.

Ameresco will investigate installing destratification fans to circulate the air in the gymnasiums and other high bay areas to reduce temperature stratification.




Replace Aging HVAC Systems All the schools in the District have dedicated cooling system for specific spaces such as front offices, IT space

and some classrooms. This is particularly present at EVHS. These units are of different makes, technology, and age. Ameresco recommends evaluating the condition of each unit to understand how close it is to its life expectancy and how efficiently each is providing conditioned air to the space; then prioritize the replacement of these units. This measure also includes the replacement of failing or failed exhaust fans at EVHS.

Install Used Oil Furnace Presently, the two bus barns are heated by natural gas fan coils and/or radiant heaters. Oil-fired furnaces and boilers are a cost-effective choice in areas with high natural gas costs. By installing a new heating system and burning waste oil from fleet maintenance, the cost of heating the bus barn can be drastically reduced. Install Radiant Gas Heaters

Radiant gas heating units only heat people and exposed surfaces instead of air and are therefore much more energy efficient heating large air-volume spaces like a gymnasium or shop. Radiant heating in these areas would significantly decrease heating fuel usage while maintaining occupant comfort. Existing ventilation systems for these spaces will remain in place for ventilation, free cooling, and backup heating.

Install Independent Heating Unit for Kitchen Typically, school kitchens use make-up air units to provide heat during many unoccupied periods. The high make-up ventilation is only required when the kitchen hood exhaust fan is being used. Ameresco recommends installing a hot water cabinet unit heater in each of the kitchens presently heated with a dedicated makeup air unit. This system will provide for comfort control when make-up air for kitchen is not required during unoccupied periods at night and weekends. Improve Ventilation Currently, Berry Creek Middle School and Avon Elementary School have multiple outside air fan coils that provide ventilation air to individual fan coil units within classrooms and other rooms. The original design intent was that these fans would provide and temper minimum required ventilation air. The fans and associated ductwork, however, were not designed to allow for economizer cooling or using outside air to cool spaces causing overheating of spaces in shoulder seasons.




This measure includes redesigning the ductwork and reprogramming the controls to allow for economizer cooling in the spaces. Energy savings will be minimal, however comfort will be greatly improved in the building.

Water Install New High Efficiency Water Fixtures Bathroom fixtures offer good water saving opportunities because many of these fixtures can be retrofitted to reduce the amount of water and energy consumed. Reducing sink water usage also saves the thermal energy used to make hot water. Ameresco will investigate retrofitting or replacing the existing fixtures with low water use alternatives. Optimize Irrigation Controls Most of the schools are irrigating using non-potable water from irrigating ditches or other sources. For the schools that are irrigation large areas with potable water, we recommend installing more advanced controllers.

Most school are using a controller, which is an automatic timer that regulates when and for how long your sprinklers run, depending on the watering schedule you enter. An automatic controller, set properly, is much more efficient than operating sprinklers manually.

To further reduce unnecessary watering we recommend installing controllers with Evapotranspiration (ET) capabilities that measures key climatic conditions to calculate local ET factors. ET is a measurement of the water lost from the soil surface by evaporation and the moisture lost from the plants by transpiration. The ET system will calculate irrigation schedules to replenish only the water that is actually needed for plant and soil conditions. The technology can intervene to trigger protective watering when extreme conditions threaten vegetation. The result is a dramatic savings in water,

healthier root zones, and longer plant life. Factors such as Evapotranspiration, Precipitation Rate, Water Budget and Adjusted Run Time are used to calculate new schedules.

Together, they reveal the amount of water to be replenished in each irrigation cycle, adjusted for seasonal differences. We will investigate the need to install new advanced controllers with ET capabilities along with networked and centralized control of the systems.




Domestic Hot Water Upgrade Domestic Hot Water System Below are several measures that can be implemented for a domestic hot water (DHW) system. Ameresco will work with the District to identify which measures are most applicable to each school. Install High Efficiency DHW Ameresco recommends replacing conventional hot water heaters with high-efficiency, condensing, domestic hot water heaters in all buildings were DHW use is substantial. These new systems can provide hot water at 98% efficiency. During the development of the project we will determine which buildings would benefit from this conversion. Turning off the circulation pump when unoccupied: At all schools, Ameresco recommends installing controls

to automatically switch the domestic hot water circulation pumps off during unoccupied periods, including nights, weekends, and the summer months. This will greatly reduce standby heat loss when hot water is not being used, reduce electricity consumed by constantly running pumps and cut down on the cycling rates of the domestic water heaters. Installing heat exchanger off of high efficiency boiler plant: Often, installing a water-to-water heat exchanger from the high efficiency main heating system can reduce energy use to provide needed DHW. The existing domestic hot water heaters will remain in place to be used during summer months so the heating boilers do not have to run during the summer.

Isolate Existing DHW Storage Tanks: Often DHW systems are installed with too much domestic hot water storage, resulting in excessive standby heat loss. Ameresco will investigate turning off the isolation valves to isolate unneeded storage capacity. Reduce Water Temp in DHW System: There are two factors that can influence the temperature of your domestic hot water. To reduce risk of Legionnaires disease, it is recommended to heat water to 140°F. At the same time, to prevent scalding at the tap, water should be delivered at 120°F or less. We will investigate the water temperature being stored and delivered and determine if there are opportunities to save energy in the production and use of hot water.




Plug Load Install Controls for Heat Tape

Heat tape is a cord or heat cable with encased electrical wire that when plugged in regulates the temperature of an exposed pipe, drain or other outdoor surface. These are commonly used to prevent roof drains from freezing solid during the winter.

Heat tape commonly incorporates a temperature control, so that they are only heating during freezing temperature. This allows the heat tape to self-regulate while being plugged in for the entire winter. Unfortunately, these devices are often forgotten and are left on year round. This can lead to unnecessary energy use, especially when the temperature regulator is portly calibrated and activates the tape at higher outdoor temperatures. Ameresco recommends installing additional controls that will automatically turn the heat tape off outside of the winter months.

Envelope Replacement or Renovation Windows

Presently, at HPES, RSES, and VSSA the majority of windows are single-pane, aluminum or steel frame windows that provide little insulating value or leak air. Replacing these windows with double-pane, vinyl-frame windows will provide greater insulation and decrease air leakage, saving a substantial amount of energy in heating and cooling. Ameresco will investigate this along with other

alternatives such as window tinting and interior accessory solutions. Insulate and seal building Air leakage is defined as “the controlled migration of conditioned air through the building envelope” caused by pressure differences due to wind, chimney (or stack) effect. Air leakage can affect the structural integrity of the building envelope through moisture migration, and it can impact the thermal comfort and indoor air quality for the occupants, through the introduction of contaminants from outside the building. Control of air leakage involves the sealing of gaps, cracks and holes using appropriate materials such as fire retardant, polyurethane foam, caulks, and appropriate weatherization materials. The goal is to create a continuous plane of “airtightness” to completely encompass the building envelope; including the need to “decouple" floor-to-floor, and to “compartmentalize” components of the building in order to equalize pressure differences. Ameresco will perform an envelope audit to evaluate all opportunities to reduce air leakage and improve occupant comfort.




Kitchen Optimize Walk-In Coolers Currently, coolers and freezers run continuously when schools are closed. We understand that turning these units off during the summer has caused maintenance issues during the start up in the fall. As an alternative, there is also the option of raising the set point temperatures so less energy is used. A second option is to install evaporator fan controls. We will work with you to identify which option will work best. This measure also includes the replacement of all walk in cooler compressors that are past their serviceable life. This conversion facilitates the change to more environmentally sound refrigerants for these units. Optimize Ice Maker Waste chill recovery (WCR) heat exchangers can be retrofitted to commercial-size automatic ice makers to improve the energy efficiency and capacity of the ice maker. Residual chilled water, normally sent down the drain, is used to

precool fresh makeup water prior to operating the ice maker’s refrigeration system.

We will investigate the ice machines throughout the District to determine the potential energy savings by using WCR heat exchangers.

Install Air Curtain for Kitchen Door The kitchen doors are often open for prolonged times as deliveries are received and garbage it taken out. This can lead to large amounts of conditioned air escaping and flying insects entering the kitchen area. An air curtain is a device used to prevent air or contaminants from moving from one open space to another. The most

common use is a downward-facing blower fan mounted over an entrance to a building, or an opening between two spaces conditioned at different temperatures. Air curtains can come with or without heaters to heat the air. These devices can act like a “vestibule” maintain an energy and cost effective barrier between the indoors and outside. Presently three schools have these installed in the kitchen doors leading to the loading docks. Ameresco recommends installing these in all schools where these doors are often used.




Other Install Renewables Ameresco has extensive experience evaluating, installing and operating renewable energy systems. These systems can be evaluated for each facility to understand the available resource and the cost effectiveness of including them in a larger project. In addition, we have had success in utilizing STEM Grants to help fund sample renewable energy to supplement educational programs. For this report, we have included solar PV systems that represent 10% of the electrical use for each facility. These systems sizes can be scaled to meet the specific needs and goals for each school. Acquire Lifts for each building Presently aerial lifts are shared between schools. This often leads to delays in repairs and maintenance as a lift is located and transported to the school in need. By providing each school with a dedicated lift, these delays can be avoided and facility staff can be more efficient in their jobs. Optimize Fleet Conversion to Natural Gas Vehicles Most school districts utilize diesel-powered busses. Ameresco would recommend investigating the alternative of natural gas vehicle (NGV). The conversion to NGV usage holds the promise of reducing carbon emissions, lessening dependence on foreign oil, and lowering transportation costs. NGVs are also appealing because the high-pressured fuel system is sealed, so little evaporative emission occurs during fueling and use. Because natural gas is generally less expensive than diesel, the greater the number of miles a vehicle is driven, the more savings a fleet will experience compared to conventional fuels. In addition, due to the economy of scale, a large school district would be able to recoup the cost of a fueling station if all diesel-burning buses were replaced with NGVs. Temperature and Timer Controls Ameresco recommends investigating the use of both temperature and timer controls for engine block heaters. Electric block heaters are commonly used in cold climates to heat a vehicle engine prior to driving. Using a block heater not only helps the vehicle start more easily and reduces wear on the engine, it also helps air quality. It only takes 2-3 hours for a block heater to fully warm a vehicle engine, however, for convenience a block heater may be left on all night. To automate the on/off heating cycle, programmable timers can be used to turn on the block heater at the appropriate time. Additionally, a power-saver cord features a built-in thermostat that will sense the temperature of the coolant in the engine and allow power through to the block heater only when the temperature drops to a pre-determined set point. Savings and cost for these measures have not been estimated or included in this feasibility study.




4. Financials Based on this preliminary assessment, we believe that the identified utility saving measures should be further investigated and included in the scope for the upcoming bond initiative. These measures, in total, represent an $8.79 million investment, resulting in over $430,000 in annual utility and operational savings and numerous other facility improvements beyond cost savings. A cost breakdown by building of this investment is provided in Attachment A.

Ameresco would be happy in further developing the energy conservation measures that benefit the District and the public would find attractive in a bond election. In partnership with you, we will select and provide the best solutions that meet the financial requirements for your project.

Maintenance Cost

Utility Cost

Savings

Post Project

Maintenance Cost

Utility Cost

Pre Project



Eagle County School District September 11, 2015

Cost Breakdown by Building

Cost Breakdown by Building

# Conservation Measures AES BCES EES EV-Add GES HPES JCES RHES RSES BCMS1.00 Lighting1.01 Retroift Interior Lighting $70,787 $84,075 $79,905 $0 $80,373 $214,462 $48,774 $77,998 $63,118 $100,2731.02 Retrofit Outdoor Lighting $3,619 $9,839 $9,927 $0 $10,535 $7,478 $11,674 $2,576 $9,782 $20,3052.00 HVAC2.01 Optimize Control System $85,246 $126,903 $66,850 $9,450 $66,850 $0 $28,350 $74,090 $66,939 $146,7612.02 Install Variable Speed HW Pumping $64,260 $52,500 $42,840 $0 $42,840 $0 $0 $48,720 $39,480 $86,4502.03 Install VAV System $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02.04 Install Destratification $5,600 $14,000 $5,600 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 $11,200 $14,0002.05 Replace Aging HVAC systems $104,720 $0 $69,440 $5,600 $0 $5,600 $0 $86,240 $0 $158,4802.06 Install Used Oil Furnace $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02.07 Install Radiant Gas Heaters $30,660 $30,660 $25,550 $0 $25,550 $0 $0 $30,660 $0 $02.08 Install Independent Heating Unit for Kitchen $0 $9,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,800 $0 $9,8002.09 Improve Ventilation $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,0003.00 Water3.01 Install new high efficiency water fixture $36,369 $30,676 $35,452 $0 $35,768 $45,736 $36,416 $35,219 $24,769 $19,8023.02 Optimize Irrigation Controls $8,616 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,610 $04.00 Domestic Hot Water4.01 Upgrade Domestic Hot Water System $2,100 $23,757 $2,100 $2,100 $23,757 $23,757 $2,100 $23,757 $2,100 $2,1005.00 Plug Load5.02 Install Controls for heat tape $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $0 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $06.00 Envelope6.01 Replace/Renovate Windows $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $312,200 $0 $0 $269,024 $06.02 Insulate and Seal Building $15,400 $11,375 $8,295 $11,410 $4,865 $11,025 $15,190 $12,215 $4,095 $8,8907.00 Kitchen7.01 Optimize Walk-In Coolers $24,059 $24,059 $24,059 $0 $24,059 $24,059 $24,059 $24,059 $24,059 $24,0597.02 Optimize Ice Maker $1,115 $1,115 $1,115 $0 $1,115 $1,115 $1,115 $1,115 $1,115 $1,1157.03 Install Air Curtin for Kitchen Door $0 $0 $1,680 $0 $0 $1,680 $0 $0 $1,680 $08.00 Other8.01 Install Renewables $56,787 $44,863 $39,470 $50,304 $47,581 $96,295 $37,509 $50,813 $30,312 $60,7858.02 Acquire Lifts for each building $7,000 $0 $7,000 $7,000 $0 $7,000 $0 $7,000 $0 $7,0008.03 Optimize Fleet $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total $867,738 $465,021 $420,684 $99,864 $378,693 $765,806 $220,587 $499,662 $557,684 $1,009,822



Eagle County School District September 11, 2015

# Conservation Measures GCMS VSSA BMHS EVHS RCHS DO WBB EBB Total1.00 Lighting1.01 Retroift Interior Lighting $136,764 $74,621 $275,996 $266,342 $6,473 $22,621 $0 $9,740 $1,612,3231.02 Retrofit Outdoor Lighting $203 $17,573 $15,643 $65,433 $3,211 $0 $0 $0 $187,7982.00 HVAC2.01 Optimize Control System $94,913 $88,474 $94,500 $136,953 $126,000 $36,400 $28,000 $28,000 $1,304,6802.02 Install Variable Speed HW Pumping $60,900 $47,040 $0 $46,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 $531,7902.03 Install VAV System $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $0 $0 $140,0002.04 Install Destratification $14,000 $11,200 $14,000 $14,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $173,6002.05 Replace Aging HVAC systems $0 $77,840 $0 $186,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $694,1202.06 Install Used Oil Furnace $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,800 $16,800 $33,6002.07 Install Radiant Gas Heaters $40,880 $25,550 $71,540 $102,200 $0 $0 $30,660 $0 $413,9102.08 Install Independent Heating Unit for Kitchen $9,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,2002.09 Improve Ventilation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,0003.00 Water3.01 Install new high efficiency water fixture $20,061 $18,606 $57,450 $12,871 $4,252 $3,991 $0 $26 $417,4633.02 Optimize Irrigation Controls $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,2264.00 Domestic Hot Water4.01 Upgrade Domestic Hot Water System $2,100 $2,100 $2,100 $45,414 $0 $0 $0 $0 $159,3425.00 Plug Load5.02 Install Controls for heat tape $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,2006.00 Envelope6.01 Replace/Renovate Windows $0 $235,424 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $816,6486.02 Insulate and Seal Building $14,665 $4,935 $0 $17,010 $7,385 $1,365 $6,510 $10,255 $164,8857.00 Kitchen7.01 Optimize Walk-In Coolers $24,059 $24,059 $539 $539 $0 $0 $0 $0 $265,7277.02 Optimize Ice Maker $0 $0 $1,115 $1,115 $1,115 $0 $0 $0 $13,3797.03 Install Air Curtin for Kitchen Door $0 $1,680 $1,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,4008.00 Other8.01 Install Renewables $69,639 $34,498 $166,243 $163,720 $4,051 $11,424 $35,155 $25,629 $1,025,0778.02 Acquire Lifts for each building $7,000 $0 $7,000 $0 $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $63,0008.03 Optimize Fleet $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

0.00 Total $494,983 $663,601 $707,805 $1,058,557 $159,486 $215,801 $117,125 $90,450 $8,793,368




5. Energy Project Delivery

Delivery Alternatives As Eagle County School District evaluates options for project implementation upon a successful bond election, Ameresco would suggest the District consider two alternative approaches to implement approved energy efficiency and renewable measures. These approaches may include Energy Professional Services or Energy Performance Contracting. Energy Professional Services The approach the Eagle County School District took at the last bond election was to employ Ameresco (Ennovate) as a professional services partner and contract our firm to provide energy evaluation, design development, construction management and commissioning services for the energy conservation measures selected for implementation. Although coordination and support was provided by Ameresco (Ennovate), the District was responsible to contract directly with various implementation subcontractors and equipment suppliers requiring District staff to process a number of contracts, pay applications and payments.

Energy Performance Contracting An alternative approach for implementing energy efficiency projects is to utilize Energy Performance Contracting. Energy Performance Contracting is not a new concept and in fact, 55 of the State’s 179 School Districts have utilized Energy Performance Contracting to address energy inefficiency and capital needs in their buildings. Utilizing Energy Performance Contracting, an Energy Services Company will guarantee not only the price of a project, but also guarantee expected future energy savings at the time an implementation contract is signed. The advantage of this type of approach, is that Eagle Schools can be assured of no project cost overruns and lower ongoing operating and utility costs. As a pre-qualified Energy Services Company with the State of Colorado, Ameresco has agreed to a specific pricing arrangement for the project. The Colorado Energy Office also offers to act as a customer advocate through the Energy Performance Contract process to assure fairness in the project delivery process.




Development Approach Regardless of the delivery method, Ameresco’s development approach is a collaborative partnership between Eagle County School District and Ameresco’s development team. The success of the design process will always be dependent on the effectiveness this collaboration. Integrating your understanding of how your buildings are currently functioning and vision of how they should be functioning - teamed with our expertise in optimizing facility systems - will result in a project that provides the highest value project that is in line with your goals.

Development and Design Team-Building Ameresco’s engineering design approach utilizes comprehensive, fundamentally sound, efficient, cost-conscious design principles while embracing proven technologies. Our staff comprises engineers with diverse experience who can address the wide-ranging challenges and operational issues facing your facilities. We have the in-house expertise to develop and implement the entire project, from initial design to operational acceptance.

Ameresco’s engineering and development team will take a collaborative partnership approach with the District and external resources; including subject matter experts, contractors, construction and commissioning and measurement and verification team members. This collaboration will insure that all aspects of each measure are addressed and a successful project is designed and implemented.




Development and Design Process Needs Assessment Meeting Ameresco will schedule and facilitate a development/design kickoff meeting with the Eagle County School District project stake holders to discuss their needs and scope ideas. In this meeting, we will listen intently to the key concerns which you would like to address in a facility improvement effort, and then propose various solution scenarios that are possible for each of your facilities. Key financial and technical goals will be established; providing Ameresco with a clear idea of how to proceed with the design effort. Based on these criteria, Ameresco will work with you to design a project following the Technical Energy Audit (TEA) process described below.

Preliminary Audit Ameresco’s design process starts with an interactive site visit to examine existing conditions and to assess all of the potential opportunities available for the installed or planned systems used by the Eagle County School District. Working with your staff, we will review the opportunities to improve facility operations and quantify the degree of potential energy savings. A minimal amount of your staff’s time will be required to arrange for facility access and basic questions regarding system operations. If mechanical drawings and sequences of operation are available for review, the engineer can utilize practical experience to more quickly gain an understanding of the systems in the facilities.

As a result of the site visit, you will become aware of possible improvements, budget costs and potential energy savings associated with each presented in a dedicated review meeting.

Technical Energy Audit (TEA) Report Development and Presentation The following eight steps are necessary to complete the Technical Energy Audit (“Final Audit”) effort and will be presented in detail within our TEA Report; creating a final scope and price for the project:

♦ Final Audit Plan Based on our preliminary findings and subsequent direction from the Eagle County School District, we will publish a schedule and plan, outlining how we expect to identify current conditions in the facilities; including data logging of key building parameters, development of subcontractor solicitation plans, and measurement and verification of energy savings. Once you approve this plan, Ameresco will proceed with execution.

♦ Data Gathering Ameresco will measure motor amperage, lighting levels, carbon-dioxide levels, log or trend operation of existing equipment, and any other baseline readings necessary to establish the current operating conditions of facility systems.

♦ Final Scoping Ameresco will take necessary field inspection information and create statements of work to solicit subcontractor bids for all work items which are to be included within the EPC.




♦ Equipment Selection Ameresco, as an independent company, does not use performance contracting

as a means to sell energy-related hardware, extended maintenance contracts, or any other products. The Eagle County School District will have final approval of all equipment selections.

♦ Final Savings Calculations Ameresco will use an energy model or complete individual energy savings calculations for all measures to be considered. Savings calculations will be reviewed by Ameresco’s Senior Project Development Engineer to ensure that savings estimates may be guaranteed.

♦ Final Project Development Once all final savings calculations have been completed and quotes have been obtained from contractors, Ameresco will evaluate the final price and scope to ensure that it meets the goals established during the development/design kickoff meeting. Any deviations to the established goals will be communicated with you for resolution / direction prior to publishing a final TEA report.

♦ Work Sessions with Customer Throughout the process of accumulating data and designing the measures, Ameresco will meet with your representatives in work sessions; to share progress and receive input on the path forward.

♦ Final Audit Report To complete the Final Audit effort, Ameresco will publish a Technical Energy Analysis Report which contains all findings, recommendations, costs, savings and other technical details relevant to the project.

Upon receipt of the TEA report, the Eagle County School District will review the report findings and provide feedback, in order to fine tune the proposed Energy Performance Contract and verify the measures and associated projected savings included within the EPC.

Construction Construction Management Ameresco actively encourages, and prefers to use, local contractors; especially those identified by the Eagle County School District as “contractors of choice.” All suppliers and contractors will be subject to separate subcontracts with Ameresco and will be pre-qualified to ensure they meet all requirements. Our project managers are responsible for finalizing subcontract details and are responsible for managing all supplier and contractor activities during the entire construction period and project closeout.

Once the EPC is executed and all subcontractors have been selected, Ameresco’s first step in executing the construction phase of the project is to assemble all of the contractors that will be working on the project in a meeting with your staff.




Construction will be performed in a timely manner, and with minimal disruption of building occupants. Ameresco will provide full construction management and administration and assume responsibility for the proper installation of all equipment.

Scheduling & Budget Control Ameresco uses scheduling tools for both communication and management. The schedule will be reviewed with you and all subcontractors during the construction meetings. Ameresco’s management team reviews the schedule’s progress monthly, along with running cost estimates and “look ahead” projections of cost, time, and outstanding issues.

Upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed, all the initial implementation and procurement cost estimates (originally generated during the development phase) will be finalized. They will be vetted by Ameresco’s project team, and will then become the final construction budgets from which the project manager works.

Warranties Ameresco requires each of its subcontractors to issue a one-year parts and workmanship (labor) warranty upon completion of their work and prior to Ameresco issuing final payment. In addition, Ameresco will transfer all commercial equipment and material warranties to the Eagle County School District during the close-out process.

If at any time during the warranty period Ameresco receives from the Eagle County School District; written notice of any failure to the systems with a warranty as described above, Ameresco and its subcontractors shall promptly and satisfactorily correct such noncompliance and remedy any damage to other parts of the work or any other property resulting from such noncompliance.

Closeout Systems Commissioning Commissioning is more than functional performance testing. Ameresco considers commissioning a part of the entire design and construction process, and not just a task at project close-out. It begins in the conceptual stages of projects and includes design reviews and construction coordination facilitation. Ameresco practices commissioning as a solutions-based approach to identifying concerns and problems early on; working through viability issues, and resolving coordination issues prior to testing and acceptance.

Ameresco will develop our commissioning plan with the Eagle County staff and require that functional testing be performed in their presence. Ameresco will work closely with the team to determine dates in the project schedule to coordinate commissioning in conjunction with the construction project. Ameresco insists that all contractors include contingency time in their schedules to account for “retesting” where needed.




Ameresco carefully develops the final pre-functional test procedures and requires that the equipment suppliers provide the commissioning agent with their “company standard” start-up checklists for specific equipment. We will also incorporate the manufacturer’s checklist with the pre-functional checklist. A final Cx report will be generated providing all commissioning plans, test forms, meeting minutes and final verification that all systems are operating as designed. Test forms are prepared in a manner for which your staff can reproduce at a later date for trouble-shooting or system re-set, if desired.

Measurement & Verification After commissioning, Ameresco begins its energy savings assessment to verify energy savings are accruing as guaranteed. Depending upon the magnitude of expected savings and the complexity of savings measurement, Ameresco may employ a variety of methods to verify energy savings.

We follow the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) for verifying guaranteed energy costs savings. Should you prefer a comprehensive approach to savings verification, Ameresco will provide monthly savings updates and then reconcile guaranteed savings annually.

Owner Training Ameresco recognizes the importance of training, and that people learn in different ways. For this reason, we have devised a comprehensive training program that involves on-site, classroom, and visual (manual) learning. Typical training sessions will include a review of the overall installation and performance history so that everyone understands the benefits of the program. Documentation will include review of O&M manuals, drawings, and equipment specification literature.




6. About Ameresco

Ameresco has been offering energy related services including performance contracting services in the energy industry for over 40 years. Ameresco has 65 branch offices in the United States, all of which offer performance contracting services. The regional office of Ameresco designated to serve the Eagle County School District was previously known as Ennovate Corporation, and has been providing energy services to its customers for more than 15 years. Headquartered in Aurora, Colorado our Rocky Mountain Regional Office serves customers in the states of Colorado, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Montana.

Ameresco provides services required to develop, implement and monitor energy-related initiatives. We have built our services around providing solutions that optimize energy use and performance of building systems, while reducing energy and cost demands. Some of our energy efficiency services include:

• Energy Auditing • Utility Bill Analysis • Facility Energy Feasibility Studies • Energy Performance Contracts (EPC) • Investment Grade Energy Audits • Design Engineering • Construction Management • Project Engineering • Commissioning • Energy Modeling • Retro-Commissioning • Training • Measurement & Verification of Savings • Financing • Monitoring of Energy Usage • Maintenance Consulting

Our staff is focused on the business of assessing customer facility needs and implementing projects that offer the best value. All of the services associated with the process of analyzing, designing and implementing these projects are managed directly by Ameresco employees.

Ameresco was the first energy services provider accredited by the National Association of Energy Services Companies (NAESCO). NAESCO accreditation is a rigorous examination of a company’s core competencies and business practices.

Ameresco is recognized by both the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy as a federally qualified ESCO, and has held this designation each year that the federal agencies have pre-qualified candidate firms. Ameresco has also been pre-qualified to implement energy performance contracts through the State of Colorado’s EPC program administered through the Colorado Energy Office.

Additional trade partners and memberships include:




2

<CUSTOMER>s

CONTACTS:

Ameresco Inc. 10650 E. Bethany, Suite A Aurora, CO 80014 Joel Asrael, Lead Engineer, Rocky Mountain Region [email protected]

ameresco.com

©2011 Ameresco Inc. Ameresco, the Ameresco logo, the orb symbol and the tagline “Green. Clean. Sustainable.” Are registered in the U.S. Patent and trademark Office. All rights reserved.

Eagle County School District Demographics and School Facilities Master Plan Data

Western Demographics Inc. 1 January 29, 2016

Eagle County School District

Demographics and School Facilities Data In Support of the Facilities Master Plan

Western Demographics Inc. January 29, 2016



ECSD Demographics and School Facilities Data Executive Summary -‐ The Eagle County School District (ECSD) has grown in enrollment significantly and continues to grow. In-‐migration, job growth and new housing construction will continue to increase overall population in the ECSD and grow school enrollments. The district grew the most significantly during the past housing boom and many of the students that resulted from that growth are now moving into the district’s middle and high school facilities. Birthrates in the district are down slightly and this phenomenon will allow the district to catch up with school facility needs before the next boom. Many new developments are producing approximately 150 new homes each year with two-‐thirds of them in the west end of the district where more students are produced by new housing than housing in more resort-‐oriented housing in the east end of the district. In general, the existing housing stock in Eagle and Gypsum produces significantly more students than elsewhere in the rest of the district and many new homes are proposed in this area. The economy and employment levels have returned to robust levels after the economic downturn and must be prepared to address new growth. This document was prepared in support of annual enrollment projections for the years 2016 – 2023 and a preliminary estimate for the year 2030. Enrollment projections have been developed by school and by grade and low, medium and high estimates have been developed in order to acknowledge that the future is uncertain, especially with regard to new housing construction. Smaller than average-‐sized grades in Kindergarten – grade 2 are replacing larger grades in grades 3 – 5, thus resulting in declines in some elementary schools. Larger than average-‐sized grades in grade 3 – 8 are advancing into middle and high school resulting in “built-‐in” growth in several secondary schools. Significant capacity shortfalls are expected at Eagle Valley Elementary, Eagle Valley Middle and Eagle Valley High School during the first eight-‐year period of the forecast. Minor capacity shortfalls are expected at Red Hill Elementary through 2023 and school seat shortages at these schools will worsen along with enrollments at Gypsum Creek Middle School by 2030. Exhibit 1 illustrates school seat shortages during the period of the forecast based on the “Medium” scenario. This report ends with facility scenarios to address these seat shortages.

Figure 1

Neighborhood School

Enro

ll 2

02

3

Fun

ctio

nal

C

apac

ity

Str

esse

d

Cap

acit

y

20

23

Sea

ts

Ava

ilab

le

Fun

ctio

nal

20

23

Sea

ts

Ava

ilab

le

Str

esse

d

Ad

dit

ion

al

Stu

den

ts b

y 2

03

0

Enro

ll 2

03

0

20

30

Sea

ts

Ava

ilab

le

Fun

ctio

nal

20

30

Sea

ts

Ava

ilab

le

Str

esse

d





The Process of School Enrollment Forecasting and Facility Planning – The process of forecasting school enrollments and planning for new school facilities has been described as a combination of art and science. In general, school population forecasting is derived from basic demographic forecasting techniques, and is somewhat based on taking recent growth or decline dynamics and applying those rates to the future. School forecasting differs significantly given that the age five to seventeen age group or “cohort” is only one seventh of the overall population and this component of the population differs in size relative to the rest of the population given the nature of the community. Communities with large employment concentrations and affordable housing tend to attract young families with school-‐aged children, while retirement-‐focused communities and many resort areas do not. Further, the public school share of the overall education services market has changed in recent decades, with many parents choosing private, parochial or charter options for their children in areas where these schools are available and parents can afford them. Understanding how these factors make the school population forecast different from overall population forecast is the “art” portion of the school planning challenge. The factors that are considered when forecasting school enrollments include the following:

• Historic School Enrollment Growth

• Birth Rates • Overall Population Growth Expectations and In-‐Migration

• School-‐aged Composition of Expected Growth • Grade-‐level Differences within the K-‐12 Population

• Job Growth and Economic Outlook • Housing Availability and Affordability • Future Land Development Plans

In general, school enrollments in Eagle County School District have grown continuously during recent decades and many expect this growth to continue. Birth rates, however, have stabilized at lower rates than those experienced during the district’s most recent “boom” period between 2006 and 2008. The County continues to grow, especially along the western end of the I-‐70 corridor. Demographers and government agencies continue to forecast straight line, no limit growth for Eagle County based on historic two percent rates, local experts are aware that land availability, development costs and infrastructure constraints will combine to limit ultimate population. Housing affordability and job growth will affect the percentage of population growth that will be younger families with school-‐aged children. The ECSD grade distribution is fairly level with the size of elementary school grades remaining mostly similar to high school grades. Elsewhere, school districts can have strong concentrations at specific grades levels with military base districts having mostly elementary and middle school students while many resort areas tend to have a concentration of high school enrollment consistent with higher housing costs. Within the existing K-‐12 population in the Eagle County Schools, Enrollments in grades 3 – 8 are somewhat higher than the other grades and these “cohorts” or larger age groups will move into the high schools thus increasing their enrollment.



The Eagle County economy and employment outlook is strong. Full employment has returned to the County in the wake of the economic downturn. Since school enrollment growth tends to directly correlate to job growth, the implications for future school enrollment growth are significant. However, any growth in workforce will require the availability of affordable housing. Local municipalities continue to encourage the development of housing that addresses this need and many new developments providing housing in all price ranges are planned for the coming decade. Leading State economists and development analysts (Metrostudy) have forecast a State-‐wide return to housing growth rates during the next five years of approximately sixty percent of those experienced during the most recent housing boom. Methodology of the School Population Forecasts in This Report – The forecasts in this report reflect a combination of all of the data previously described into a hybridized forecast through 2023 reflecting the historical growth trends of the most recent year combined with three scenarios reflecting a low, medium and high new housing absorption rate. The low rate reflects the current rate of new housing absorption of approximately 150 new homes per year. The medium and high rates reflect annual absorption rates of 230 and 325 respectively. The thinking behind the high rate was to simply double the current rate. The long-‐term forecasting through 2030 reflects an increase to 400 units per year to reflect trending toward the “sixty percent of boom growth” rate. Between 2006 and 2008, Eagle County’s average absorption was 718 new units per year. Multiplying the 718 units by the theoretical sixty percent ratio yields a maximum annual absorption of 431. An absorption rate of 400 units per year was used to reflect the approximate nature of the figures. Eagle County Population Growth and Forecast – Overall Eagle County population has grown by approximately two percent per year during the decade between 2000 and 2010. This decade was followed by a slower growth period between 2010 and 2015 with a growth rate of 0.5%. 2015 population is currently holding just over 53,000. Forecasts from the Colorado State Demographer indicate significant growth through 2050, largely as a result of in-‐migration and new house construction as illustrated in Figure 2. However, many who follow the State Demographer’s forecasting acknowledge that the State’s forecasts tend to discount the constraints of mountain and resort area land development such as land and water availability and local land use policies. Local policy makers and real estate analysts understand that developing the entire vacant, non-‐BLM portion of the County is not feasible given land and infrastructure costs and open space goals of local governments. Therefore, the local perspective on the eventual doubling of the Eagle County population by 2050 is that ultimate population growth will be more moderate and the “build-‐out” of the County is probably further out into the future. Further, the Eagle County School District does not include all of Eagle County and some of this growth will be in the Roaring Fork School District. In general, the message of this data is that population in Eagle County and in the ECSD is expected to continue to increase, but at some point, stability will be attained.



Figure 2 – Division of Local Government / State Demographer Forecast Eagle County

Eagle County Total Population Growth Rates -‐ The State Demographer’s forecast growth rates vary over time as illustrated in Figure 3. Average growth rates increase during the next five years eventually peaking at approximately 2.8 percent in 2025. The implication of this dynamic suggests that growth rates of approximately two percent are probable in the County and the majority of that growth would result in new housing construction to accommodate the new residents.

Figure 3 – Div. of Local Government / State Demographer Annual Growth Rates - Eagle County

Eagle County Annual Net Migration Expectations – The State Demographer’s Office expects annual net migration to steadily rise during the coming years to approximately 1320 in 2023 where that rate of annual net migration holds for a significant period of time. There is no explanation why the higher plateau of in-‐migration is reached in this year in the State’s information. It is assumed that business cycle or planned land development effects could have some impact. This net migration fuels the majority of expected population growth in the State’s population forecast and could result in potential school enrollment growth. The potential for school population growth is dependent upon housing affordability, which has a heavy effect on the composition of population that results from growth. School enrollments are frequently stable or stagnant in resort areas where only high-‐end housing has been offered.

43,288&

47,278&

52,057&

53,303&

57,226&

65,046&

74,776&

84,565&

94,085&

101,260&

107,312&

0&

20,000&

40,000&

60,000&

80,000&

100,000&

120,000&

July,&2000&

July,&2005&

July,&2010&

July,&2015&

July,&2020&

July,&2025&

July,&2030&

July,&2035&

July,&2040&

July,&2045&

July,&2050&

Eagle&County&Popula/on&0&2000&0&2050&

1.8%%1.9%%

0.5%%

1.4%%

2.6%%2.8%%

2.5%%

2.2%%

1.5%%1.2%%

0.0%%

0.5%%

1.0%%

1.5%%

2.0%%

2.5%%

3.0%%

%00-05

%

%'05-10

%

%'10-15

%

%'15-20

%

%'20-25

%

%'25-30

%

%'30-35

%

%'35-40

%

%'40-45

%

%'45-50

%

Eagle&County&Average&Annual&Growth&3&2000&3&2050&



Figure 4 – Eagle County Net Migration

Eagle County Population Composition – The composition of 2015 population estimates is balanced with no specific sector of the population spectrum dominating the overall population. Child-‐bearing age ranges of 20 – 34 are well represented relative to the remainder of the population, and the percentage of the population that is school aged is somewhat smaller than the rest of the population, but not by much in relative terms. The male population differential in which there are more male residents reflects resort employment, which tends to be more male. In general terms, the population is not retirement-‐aged or skewed toward middle-‐aged residents, as is the case in many resort communities. The typical dip in college-‐aged population shown in the graph is expected in a mountain community without a university. The primary meaning of this graphic to ECSD future enrollment growth expectations is that the population is more balanced than in other resort communities and housing and in-‐migration is more likely to produce students.

Figure 5 – Eagle County Population Composition Using 5-year Cohorts

120 200 300 400 500 600 640 720

1320

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Annual Net Migration Forecast - Colorado State Demographer - 2015 - 2023

Annual Net Migration

1613

1967

1928

1642

2065

2511

2296

2243

2114

1987

1923

1906

1565

1207

725

346

160

68

13

3

0

1543

1899

1836

1618

1774

1981

1906

1843

1773

1590

1778

1694

1380

1159

680

301

168

66

27

5

1

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

0 to 4 5 to 9

10 to 14 15 to 19 20 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 34 35 to 39 40 to 44 45 to 49 50 to 54 55 to 59 60 to 64 65 to 69 70 to 74 75 to 79 80 to 84 85 to 89 90 to 94 95 to 99 100+

Female Number Male Number



Historic Enrollment Growth in the Eagle County School District -‐ PK-‐12 Enrollment in the Eagle County School District has steadily increased during the past five years at a rate of approximately two percent. The average annual growth rate during the past ten years was 2.45 percent even given the effects of the economic downturn. In general, elementary enrollment has been stable since 2008 while middle and high school enrollments have grown. Figure 6 illustrates this growth in table form with the average annual growth rates shown on the far right. The elementary school (K-‐5) column shows the stable elementary school enrollment experienced between 2008 and 2015 while the grade 6-‐8 and grade 9-‐12 enrollments grew during this period. Figure 7 illustrates the same dynamics graphically and suggests that overall enrollment will continue to grow with secondary school enrollments driving growth in the short-‐term.

Figure 6 - ECSD Historical Enrollment– 2005 - 2015

Year (K-5) (6-8) (9-12) Total with

Preschool

Total K-12

PK-12 Net

Growth Preschool

PK-12 Percentage

Growth

Average Growth Rates

2005 2610 1183 1423 5365 5216 149 2006 2665 1135 1487 5426 5287 61 139 1.14% 2007 2767 1190 1556 5679 5513 253 166 4.66% 2008 3024 1193 1604 6007 5821 328 186 5.78% 2009 3088 1248 1695 6244 6031 237 213 3.95% 2010 3032 1265 1659 6181 5956 -63 225 -1.01%

2011 3069 1380 1694 6344 6143 163 201 2.64% 10-yr Avg

2012 3084 1396 1737 6408 6217 64 191 1.01% 2.45% 2013 3065 1453 1760 6520 6278 112 242 1.75% 2014 3064 1519 1881 6713 6464 193 249 2.96% 5-yr Avg 2015 3023 1558 1980 6826 6561 113 265 1.68% 2.01%

Figure 7 - ECSD Historical Enrollment– 2005 - 2015

2610 2665 2767 3024 3088 3032 3069 3084 3065 3064 3023

1183 1135 1190 1193 1248 1265 1380 1396 1453 1519 1558 1423 1487 1556 1604 1695 1659 1694 1737 1760 1881 1980

5365 5426 5679

6007 6244 6181

6344 6408 6520 6713 6826

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Eagle County School District - Enrollment History - 2005 - 2015

(K-‐5) (6-‐8) (9-‐12) Total with Preschool



ECSD Grade Sizes- K - 12 – During the past decade, ECSD grade sizes have changed relative to each other. During the 2006-‐07 school year, the district had significantly larger elementary school grade sizes with smaller secondary (middle and high school) grades as shown by the blue bars and trend line in Figure 8. The red bars and orange trend line indicate the relative grade sizes by the 2011 – 2012 school year illustrate the larger grades moving into grades three through six, but the larger elementary grades / smaller secondary grades distribution continues. The green bars and trend line illustrates the leveling of grade sizes from grade 2 – 12 and the start of smaller grade sizes below 500 in grades kindergarten and first. In general, there is “built-‐in” growth coming for the middle and high schools within the grade distribution that will happen whether new housing and in-‐migration increase enrollment or not. Elementary growth will be more dependent upon residential housing growth into the future.

Figure 8 - ECSD Grade Sizes – 2006, 2011, 2015

ECSD Grade Sizes- K - 2 – Figure 9 illustrates the decline in primary school enrollments (Grade kindergarten – second grade) between roughly 2008 and 2015. All three grades have generally declined in enrollment during this period.

Figure 9 - ECSD Grade Sizes – Kindergarten – Second Grade

496

526

411

414

402 416

367 381

387

423

359

364

341

546

493 510

549

498

473 49

6

442

442

444

435

393

422

481

477 50

2

559

543

461

513 524

521

492

538

464 48

6

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

ECSD Grade Sizes - 2006, 2011, 2015

2006 2011 2015 2 per. Mov. Avg.(2006) 2 per. Mov. Avg.(2011) 2 per. Mov. Avg.(2015)

546

496

546

610

539 501

546 539 500 488 481

442

526

469

539

596

513 493

539 544 517

477

421 411

526 488

528 565

510 471

539 548

502

300

600

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

ECSD Historical Grade-Level Enrollment - K - 2

Kindergarten 1 2



ECSD Grade Sizes- 3 - 5 – Figure 10 illustrates the leveling of growth in the intermediate grades (grades three through five) during the approximate period 2008 through 2015.

Figure 10 - ECSD Grade Sizes – Grade 3 - 5

ECSD Grade Sizes- 6 - 8 – Figure 11 illustrates the growth in the middle school grades (grades 6 – 8) during the past decade.

Figure 11 - ECSD Grade Sizes – Grades 6 - 8

409 414 429

518

481 496

549

511

458

543 559

421 402

414 437

515

458

498 521

499

460

543

371

416

383

432 429

499 473

503 525

508

461

300

600

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

ECSD Historical Grade-Level Enrollment - Grade 3 - 5

3 4 5

377 367

413 402

431 426

496

464

495

530 513

393 381 380

419

395

438 442

488 480

503 524

413

387 397

372

422 401

442 444

478 486

521

300

600

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015


6 7 8



ECSD Grade Sizes- 9 - 12 – Figure 12 illustrates the growth in the high school grades (grades 9 – 12) during the past decade.

Figure 12 - ECSD Grade Sizes – 9 - 12

ECSD Births -‐ Birth rates are down slightly in the Eagle County School District from their record highs during the most recent housing boom, which occurred between 2006 and 2008. Births during this period hovered around 700 per year. The most recent birth year data from the Colorado Department of Health suggests an average annual birth count for babies residing within the school district of 500. The most recent year in which data was available was 2014 and there was an increase to 552 for the district. These trends are illustrated in Figure 13 and future enrollment projections for kindergarten partially reflect these trends.

Figure 13 – Eagle County School District Births – 2003 - 2014

386

423 412 410

446 441 444 442 449

522

492

370 359

417

391 403 395

435 437 430

466

538

352 364 361

413 401

419

393

425 414

430

464

315

341

366

390

445

404 422

433

467 463

486

300

600

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015


9 10 11 12

602$ 591$

533$

680$ 682$ 700$

607$ 590$

502$ 513$

459$

552$

0$

100$

200$

300$

400$

500$

600$

700$

800$

2003$ 2004$ 2005$ 2006$ 2007$ 2008$ 2009$ 2010$ 2011$ 2012$ 2013$ 2014$

Eagle&County&School&District&4&Births&4&2003&&4&2014&4&Colorado&Department&of&Health&



ECSD Births Correlated to Actual Kindergarten Enrollment – Figure 14 illustrates the approximate correlation between births and kindergarten enrollment five years later. The average correlation between births and kindergarten enrollment averaged 1.2 for the most recent five years. This correlation suggests that some kindergarteners may be attending non-‐public schools.

Figure 14 – ECSD Correlation of Births to Actual Public School Kindergarten Enrollment Eagle County School District - Births and Kindergarten Correlation - 2004 - 2017

Kinder Year Kindergarten Enrollment Birth Year Births Correlation Average

Correlation

2005 546 2006 496 2007 546 2003 602 1.10 2008 610 2004 591 0.97 2009 539 2005 533 0.99 2010 501 2006 680 1.36 2011 546 2007 682 1.25 2012 539 2008 700 1.30 2013 500 2009 607 1.21 2014 488 2010 590 1.21 2015 481 2011 502 1.04 1.20 5-year Average

1.16 9-year Average Eagle County Employment and Workforce Observations – The Eagle County labor force has been holding at approximately 32,000 for the for the past five years with an improvement to 32,700 for the most recent data year of 2014. Generally speaking, recent employment levels have steadily improved since a relative low point during the worst year of the economic downturn in 2009. During the most recent five years, unemployment has declined from 8.5 percent to 4.2 percent, which generally indicates full employment. The implications of these statistics on school enrollment growth suggest stability given the fact that school enrollments are generally directly correlated to employment levels. The future growth expectations of State forecasters generally assume that in-‐migration in the County and the school district will result in a growth in the work force. Direct correlation of work force growth to enrollment growth will also depend upon the availability of affordable housing for families. Student yield in the forecasts for this report assume the recent five-‐year mix in house price range and hence student yield.



Eagle County Employed Population – Figure 15 illustrates the steady growth in the number of persons employed in Eagle County.

Figure 15 - Eagle County Employed Population – 1990 - 2014

Eagle County Labor Force -‐ Figure 16 illustrates the steady growth in the labor force in Eagle County. The past five years have been stable.

Figure 16 - Eagle County Labor Force – 1990 - 2014

12,065'

12,640'

13,131'

14,107'

16,021'

17,227'

17,907'

19,153'

20,521'

20,950' 25,014'

25,294'

25,561'

24,960'

26,136'

27,325'

28,823'

30,053'

30,535'

28,382'

29,697'

29,631'

30,063'

30,097'

31,357'

0'

5,000'

10,000'

15,000'

20,000'

25,000'

30,000'

35,000'

1990'

1991'

1992'

1993'

1994'

1995'

1996'

1997'

1998'

1999'

2000'

2001'

2002'

2003'

2004'

2005'

2006'

2007'

2008'

2009'

2010'

2011'

2012'

2013'

2014'

Eagle&County&Employed&0&1990&0&2014&&12,519&

13,281&

14,070&

14,891&

16,626&

17,775&

18,477&

19,716&

21,151&

21,519& 25

,631&

26,096&

26,693&

26,188&

27,314&

28,407&

29,827&

30,929&

31,666&

30,521&

32,447&

32,154&

32,374&

32,043&

32,739&

0&

5,000&

10,000&

15,000&

20,000&

25,000&

30,000&

35,000&

1990&

1991&

1992&

1993&

1994&

1995&

1996&

1997&

1998&

1999&

2000&

2001&

2002&

2003&

2004&

2005&

2006&

2007&

2008&

2009&

2010&

2011&

2012&

2013&

2014&

Eagle&County&Labor&Force&2&1990&2&2014&



Eagle County Unemployed -‐ Figure 17 illustrates the steady decline in the number of unemployed persons in Eagle County during the past five years from the high point of 2,750 in 2010 to the low of 1,382 in 2014.

Figure 17 - Eagle County Unemployed Population – 1990 - 2014

Eagle County Unemployment Rate -‐ Figure 18 illustrates the steady decline in the unemployment rate in Eagle County during the past five years from the high point of 8.5 percent in 2010 to the low of 4.2 percent in 2014. 4.2 percent is generally acknowledged as “full employment” according to most economists. The implications for school enrollments suggest strength and stability for schools given the strength in the economy.

Figure 18 - Eagle County Unemployment Rate – 1990 - 2014

454# 64

1#

939#

784#

605#

548#

570#

563# 630#

569# 617# 80

2#

1,132#

1,228#

1,178#

1,082#

1,004#

876#

1,131#

2,139#

2,750#

2,523#

2,311#

1,946#

1,382#

0#

500#

1000#

1500#

2000#

2500#

3000#

1990#

1991#

1992#

1993#

1994#

1995#

1996#

1997#

1998#

1999#

2000#

2001#

2002#

2003#

2004#

2005#

2006#

2007#

2008#

2009#

2010#

2011#

2012#

2013#

2014#

Eagle&County&Unemployed&1&1990&1&2014&&3.60%& 4.

80%&

6.70%&

5.30%&

3.60%&

3.10%&

3.10%&

2.90%&

3.00%&

2.60%&

2.40%&

3.10%& 4.20%&

4.70%&

4.30%&

3.80%&

3.40%&

2.80%& 3.60%&

7.00%&

8.50%&

7.80%&

7.10%&

6.10%&

4.20%&

0.00%&

1.00%&

2.00%&

3.00%&

4.00%&

5.00%&

6.00%&

7.00%&

8.00%&

9.00%&

1990&

1991&

1992&

1993&

1994&

1995&

1996&

1997&

1998&

1999&

2000&

2001&

2002&

2003&

2004&

2005&

2006&

2007&

2008&

2009&

2010&

2011&

2012&

2013&

2014&

Eagle&County&Unemployment&Rate&1&1990&1&2014&&



Housing Growth – Eagle County School District has added a significant amount of new housing each year throughout its history. As a resort district, the types of housing to be constructed in a specific area tend to produce differing amounts of public school children. Resort housing and large estate residential homes, especially those in gated communities, tend to produce very few children. In general, all single-‐family homes, regardless of location, produce more school children than apartments, town homes or condominiums. Mobile and modular housing is unique, especially in resort communities, as a housing type that appeals to working families because of its affordability. Because of this affordability, mobile and modular homes tend to produce more school-‐aged children than single-‐family homes. In the ECSD, the resort dynamics tend to result in new housing in the western portion of the school district generally producing significantly more students than housing in the eastern portion of the district. Homes in Vail, Avon, Eagle-‐Vail, Edwards and eastern portions of unincorporated Eagle County can be heavily influenced by the Vail and Beaver Creek resorts. With many seasonal homes or rental properties, many homes in these areas do not yield many school-‐aged children. In general, many portions of Eagle and Gypsum host the types of homes that are of a price and density profile that produces more school-‐aged children. In general, single-‐family homes on moderately-‐sized lots tend to produce the most students. There are a couple of exceptions, with mobile or modular homes and workforce housing producing more students in some areas. Average Student Yield Rates – Student yield is a ratio that calculates how many new students result from new homes constructed. Figure 19 displays the average student yield rates from housing in various ECSD communities based on aggregate samples in county assessor’s data. Duplexes were not specifically identified in the data that was available. Duplex yield is expected to be similar to single family detached student yield.

Figure 19 Eagle County Aggregate Student Yield Community Averages from

Housing Units Linkable to Student Enrollment – 11/15/15

Area Dwelling Type Elem Yield Middle Yield High Yield Total Yield AVON Single Family 0.23 0.15 0.15 0.53 AVON Condo 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 EAGLE Single Family 0.26 0.15 0.14 0.54 EAGLE Condo 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.06 EDWARDS Single Family 0.09 0.08 0.11 0.28 EDWARDS Condo 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.10 GYPSUM Single Family 0.27 0.15 0.22 0.65 GYPSUM Condo 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.11 VAIL Single Family 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.15 VAIL Condo <0.00 <0.00 <0.00 0.01

ECSD Student Yield In Selected Neighborhoods – Some neighborhoods in the ECSD produce greater or lesser student yields than other subdivisions because of the special nature of the housing. Two Rivers Village as a modular housing development produces very high student yields of over one student per unit. Stratton Flats, as a small lot single-‐family development, produces high yields as well with more than one student in every unit. Cotton Ranch, Buckhorn Valley, Eagle Ranch and Homestead all produce student yields very much in line with community averages as they are fairly typical single-‐family developments. Cordillera is an estate residential community, which has extremely low student yield rates consistent with other estate residential and gated communities in the ECSD.



Figure 20 - ECSD Student Yield In Selected Neighborhoods

ECSD Planned New Housing -‐ Significant amounts of new housing are planned that will produce new students. The new housing that will produce the most students is located primarily in the western half of the district, but all housing has the potential to produce students to a certain degree. Therefore all developments with significant scale are addressed in this analysis regardless of their location – east or west. In addition to new housing planned in specific developments, there is a significant amount of infill housing occurring in the ECSD. Many of these are in the category of “estate residential” which typically includes more expensive homes on larger lots and produces fewer students. In general, the methodology of this analysis with respect to new housing is to focus on the larger developments where future expectations are more tangible and locations are more defined and assume that infill growth will complement growth in developments and occur roughly in the same locations with similar student yield rates. In order to avoid an unrealistically complex analysis, the infill has been combined into the aggregate analysis. This analysis represents the best thinking of the team which evaluated the potential for future growth in the ECSD. The estimates and development forecast discussed here are a “best guess” and the three scenarios (low, medium and high) reflect the approximate nature of future projections of this type. Development Types – The various new developments that are either currently active or planned well into the future are classified into four categories given the expected timing of the impact of the new housing. Type 1 – Turnkey/ready for development -‐ These developments are either currently active or will produce new units within three years. Type 2 – Zoned/platted -‐ These developments will produce new units within three to eight years. Type 3 – Zoned/platted/no infrastructure – Unit s produced after eight years. Type 4 – “Master plan” level -‐ Units produced well into the future beyond the eight year horizon.

Subdivision Dwelling Type Community

Exis

tin

g

Un

its

Ele

men

tary

S

tud

en

ts

Mid

dle

Sch

S

tud

en

ts

Hig

h S

ch

Stu

den

ts

Ele

m S

ch

Yie

ld

Mid

dle

Sch

Y

ield

Hig

h S

ch

Yie

ld

To

tal Y

ield

Two Rivers Village Modular Housing Dotsero 106 60 18 30 0.566 0.170 0.283 1.019Cotton Ranch Mixed Density Gypsum 214 55 36 41 0.257 0.168 0.192 0.617

Buckhorn ValleySmall/Medium Lot Single Family Gypsum 206 72 34 46 0.350 0.165 0.223 0.738

Stratton FlatsSmall Lot Residential Gypsum 52 38 11 13 0.731 0.212 0.250 1.192

Eagle Ranch Mixed Density Eagle 325 93 62 50 0.286 0.191 0.154 0.631Cordillera Estate Residential Edwards 645 3 5 5 0.005 0.008 0.008 0.020Homestead Mixed Density Edwards 420 130 67 91 0.310 0.160 0.217 0.686



Major Subdivisions – The following subdivisions represent the majority of expected development impact in the ECSD during the next eight years and into the foreseeable future through 2030. Again, there is infill development potential and other development in smaller subdivisions, but given the scope of this analysis, the larger developments were used to establish the location of growth and to serve as a quantitative reference for the analysis. Two Rivers PUD / Type 1 and 2 – Of the 321 remaining units, approximately 161 are SF and Duplex units and 160 multi-‐family units (condominiums, apartments or townhomes). The SF and Duplex development is Type 1; the 160 multi-‐family would require some extension of infrastructure and are categorized as Type 2. The 161 remaining SF/Duplex units is a “soft” number based on review of aerial photos and windshield survey (County does not have current data on remaining development potential) Dotsero Area Community Plan / Type 4 -‐ The Dotsero Plan was adopted in 2012. With the exception of the Two Rivers Village project, the level of development within Dotsero’s existing “community center” is limited and the amount of land where new development could occur is relatively limited. The Plan’s Future Land Use Map does identify the potential for expanding the existing community center if or when central water and sewer service can be expanded. The Plan does not provide an estimate of new residential development that could be sustained in Dotsero. The potential for new residential development in Dotsero were estimated based on available land area and assumed densities (units per acre). Cotton Ranch-Lower / Type 1 – These 78 units are scattered throughout the PUD, in essence in-‐fill lots. We do not have information on housing type (SF, duplex or MF). Cotton Ranch-The Village at Cotton Ranch / Type 1 – This is a townhome (or duplex) project that recently started a first phase of development. Remington Ranch / Type 3 – This project is approved but no steps have been taken to develop the property. When developed, it would likely be targeted toward families. Brightwater / Type 1 and 2 – This project was originally envisioned as a second-‐home, gated golf course community, one that would not likely generate many students. Only 18 homes have been constructed in the project which has approval for 535 units. The project has been categorized as both category 1 (because a significant amount of development could occur today, and category 2 (because amendments to current approvals would be needed if the project were re-‐branded. Buckhorn Valley / Type 1 and 2 – Approximately 65 units are ready to build and another 587 can be developed in the future subject to final plat approvals and the extension of roads and infrastructure. Saddle Ridge / Type 4 – This project was approved years ago for a golf course, vacation homes (fractional fee units) and a limited amount of residential units. Project approvals have lapsed and the property has recently gone under contract. No information is available on what the use of this land may be. Stratton Flats / Type 1 and 2 -‐ Approximately 42 units are ready to build and another 224 can be developed in the future subject to final plat approvals and the extension of roads and infrastructure.



Gypsum Eagle River Planning Area -‐ Type 4 – The town master plan identifies this area for future development of approximately 556 units. There are a number of individual land owners within the planning area. Zoning for this future development is not in place, nor is infrastructure necessary to serve the development. The town master plan does identify a school site within the planning area. Eagle River Station / Type 4 – This project was approved as a large-‐scale regional retail and residential (550 units) project a few years ago. At that time the residential was planned to be high-‐end apartments that were not expected to generate significant students. Project approvals have since lapsed and while there is some speculation that the project may come back with a greater emphasis on residential development, it is unclear as to what will be proposed for the land. Town of Eagle – River Corridor Plan / Type 4 – The River Corridor Plan outlines future growth opportunities for hundreds of acres located along the Eagle River within the Town of Eagle and unincorporated Eagle County. There are a number of individual land owners within the planning area. Zoning for this future development is not in place, nor is infrastructure necessary to serve the development. The Plan contemplates a combination of open space, river access, low-‐density residential and mix-‐use development within the planning area. Haymeadow / Type 3 and 4 – Haymeadow is approved for 837 total units. Final plats are in place for the initial phase; however extensive infrastructure is necessary before any development can occur. Speculation is the earliest time that infrastructure work would occur is 2017. The developer is obligated to provide a school site sufficient in size to accommodate a K-‐5 or K-‐8. Eagle Ranch / Type 1 – There are many larger lot SF lots remaining. Wolcott / Type 3 – This large scale, mixed use project received zoning approvals a couple of years ago. The project has not completed any final platting, nor is any infrastructure improvements in place (note that significant infrastructure improvements are necessary to move forward). Lake Creek Meadows / Type 4 – This project obtained Sketch Plan approval a few years ago for up to 240 units but project approvals have lapsed. While it is likely that this land will be developed, it is uncertain what type and form of development will be proposed. West End / Type 4 – This mixed-‐use project with 185 units was approved a number of years ago but project approvals have lapsed. While it is likely that this land will be developed, it is uncertain what type and form of development will be proposed. Cordillera / Type 1 – While many units are turnkey ready to develop, the nature of this community is such that no significant number of students would be generated by these units. Avon Village / Type 3 – This large-‐scale mixed use project was approved many years ago (>15 years) and currently has 2,156 potential units remaining. Development approvals allow a great deal of latitude and there is no real way to speculate as to the type of units that may be constructed or when they may be constructed. Most of the project is not final platted and in most cases significant infrastructure work will be necessary in order to initiate development. The town planner has estimated that 250 units are turnkey with the balance requiring platting and infrastructure improvements. The developer is obligated to provide ECS with a +/-‐3.5 acre school dedication site at some point in the development process.



Town of Vail Project / Type 3 – This project has zoning in place and is currently in the review process. Construction of the +/-‐60 units is anticipated for 2017 and the project is targeted towards local families. Unit mix is planned to include duplex, townhome and condominiums. Maloit Park / Type 3 – ESC owns this property and has the potential to develop up to 120 units. There is no timetable for developing this land. Railroad Yards / Type 4 – While there have been no recent public discussions, the Union Pacific had previously discussed the potential development of this area. Battle Mountain Project / Type 4 – This large scale project was approved a few years ago as a vacation club with ski area, golf course and 1700 units. To date no development has been done and the project is currently dormant. It is unclear if or when this project will be initiated. Eagle Vail Business Center Master Plan - The Eagle Vail Plan was adopted in 2014. The Plan focuses on the commercial district along the Hwy 6 corridor and contemplates the potential for this area to evolve from existing commercial/industrial uses to mixed-‐use commercial/residential land uses. The Plan does not provide an estimate of how much residential development could be developed in the planning area. The potential for new residential development in this area was estimated based on available land area and assumed densities (units per acre). Future Housing Construction Scenarios – On average, approximately 150 new homes per year were constructed in ECSD during the past five years. Using this average rate of new home absorption as a basis, a low scenario (reflective of the current rate) for new housing has been established to predict the number of new students that might result from this construction as distributed according to the developments described above. Given the amount of real estate activity and new development planning underway, middle and high scenarios were developed to reflect a business cycle-‐based return to more significant housing growth in the ECSD. The high residential absorption of just over 300 is not near the record housing absorption levels during the last boom (approximately 700 per year), but does represent an increase in housing activity of 100 percent. The medium basis is calculated at the mid point of the current rate (low scenario) and the doubled growth figure of 300 units per year (the high scenario). Figure 21 shows the three new housing scenarios and figure 22 illustrates the expected distribution of the new housing with two-‐thirds of it in the Eagle / Gypsum area.



Figure 21 - Eagle County Housing Absorption

Figure 22

ECSD Enrollment Forecast Scenarios – 2016 - 2023 -‐ The three new housing scenarios result in low, medium and high enrollment forecasts of approximately 7,200, 7,400 and 7,600 students by 2023. The three scenarios are shown in Figures 23 and 24. Figure 24 shows the percentage growth historically in the district of approximately 2.45 percent during the past ten years. The 8-‐year average annual growth percentages are 0.71, 1.04 and 1.46 percent for the low, medium and high scenarios respectively. These growth rates are relatively conservative and reflect the continuation of lower elementary school growth enrollments resulting from the lower birth rates. Secondary school enrollments continue to grow significantly, especially high school. In general, the high growth rate scenario keeps the ECSD on its historic growth pace and off-‐sets the lower birth rates and lower kindergarten / first grade enrollments that pull the enrollment trend downward as indicated by the low and medium scenarios.

151 151 152 150 150 152 152 152 152 156 170 196 211 227 230 234

152 193

256 295

319 326 326 328

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

ECSD - Future Housing Growth Scenarios - 2016 - 2023

Low Medium High

34%

66%

ECSD - Percentage of Future Development by Area

East West



Figure 23

Figure 24 shows the low, medium and high forecasts in tabular form and adds the elementary, middle and high school detail.

5365 5426

5679

6007

6244 6181

6344 6408

6520

6713

6826

6993

7106 7126 7186 7188 7183 7180 7221

5365 5426

5679

6007

6244 6181

6344 6408

6520

6713

6826

6996

7109 7133 7210

7259 7283 7320

7412

5365 5426

5679

6007

6244 6181

6344 6408

6520

6713

6826

6954

7086

7205

7315 7398

7464 7535

7663

5000

5500

6000

6500

7000

7500

8000

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

Eagle County School District - Enrollment History and Multi-basis Enrollment Forecast - 2005 - 2023

Low Forecast Medium Forecast High Forecast



Figure 24 - ECSD Enrollment Forecast Scenarios – 2016 - 2023

Year (K-5) (6-8) (9-12)

Total with

Preschool

Total K-12

Net Growth Preschool Percentage

Growth 10-yr Avg

2005 2610 1183 1423 5365 5216 149

2006 2665 1135 1487 5426 5287 61 139 1.14%

2007 2767 1190 1556 5679 5513 253 166 4.66%

2008 3024 1193 1604 6007 5821 328 186 5.78%

2009 3088 1248 1695 6244 6031 237 213 3.95%

2010 3032 1265 1659 6181 5956 -63 225 -1.01%

2011 3069 1380 1694 6344 6143 163 201 2.64%

2012 3084 1396 1737 6408 6217 64 191 1.01%

2013 3065 1453 1760 6520 6278 112 242 1.75%

2014 3064 1519 1881 6713 6464 193 249 2.96%

2015 3023 1558 1980 6826 6561 113 265 1.68% 2.45%

Low Forecast (K-5) (6-8) (9-12)

Total with

Preschool

Total K-12 Preschool Percentage

Growth 8-yr Avg

2016 3074 1535 2119 6993 6728 265 2.45%

2017 3025 1574 2242 7106 6841 265 1.62%

2018 2948 1648 2265 7126 6861 265 0.28%

2019 2912 1724 2285 7186 6921 265 0.84%

2020 2907 1671 2345 7188 6923 265 0.03%

2021 2919 1596 2403 7183 6918 265 -0.07%

2022 2916 1565 2434 7180 6915 265 -0.04%

2023 2919 1573 2464 7221 6956 265 0.57% 0.71%

Medium Forecast (K-5) (6-8) (9-12)

Total with

Preschool


Growth 8-yr Avg

2016 3074 1538 2119 6996 6731 265 2.49%

2017 3025 1577 2242 7109 6844 265 1.62%

2018 2948 1651 2269 7133 6868 265 0.34%

2019 2918 1730 2297 7210 6945 265 1.08%

2020 2943 1686 2365 7259 6994 265 0.68%

2021 2961 1626 2431 7283 7018 265 0.33%

2022 2976 1601 2478 7320 7055 265 0.51%

2023 3009 1618 2520 7412 7147 265 1.26% 1.04%

High Forecast (K-5) (6-8) (9-12)

Total with

Preschool


Growth 8-yr Avg

2016 3032 1538 2119 6954 6689 265 1.88%

2017 2995 1580 2246 7086 6821 265 1.90%

2018 2978 1669 2293 7205 6940 265 1.68%

2019 2972 1757 2321 7315 7050 265 1.53%

2020 3003 1725 2405 7398 7133 265 1.13%

2021 3045 1671 2483 7464 7199 265 0.89%

2022 3078 1658 2534 7535 7270 265 0.95%

2023 3111 1687 2600 7663 7398 265 1.70% 1.46%



Enrollment Forecast and School Seat Needs – Enrollment forecasts for the period 2016 – 2023 were compared to school capacities for each facility in the ECSD. The seats available or short given the medium scenario are displayed in Figure 25 with calculations for 2023 relative to the districts “Functional” and “Stressed” capacity figures. Significant capacity shortfalls are expected at Eagle Valley Elementary, Eagle Valley Middle and Eagle Valley High School during the first eight-‐year period of the forecast. Minor capacity shortfalls are expected at Red Hill Elementary through 2023 and school seat shortages at these schools will worsen along with enrollments at Gypsum Creek Middle School by 2030. This is the same figure as that shown on page 2 as Figure 1. The housing growth figures for the period 2024 – 2030 are based on a higher 400 new units per year annual housing absorption.

Figure 25

Summary and Facility Implications – The obvious school needs by 2023 are focused at Eagle Valley ES, MS and HS and various scenarios have been developed by the ECSD’s architectural consultants in order to address both the future seat needs at those schools and the condition of these facilities which tend to be among the older schools in the ECSD. Figure 26 addresses various options to address school needs through 2023 and Western Demographics has commented on the demographic implications of each scenario. In short, school construction is clearly warranted at the three schools mentioned and additional actions are required at Red Hill Elementary toward the end of the period. Boundary adjustments and school expansions could be used to partially balance enrollment between the schools within the Gypsum and Eagle communities. Distances outside of the individual town boundaries make boundary adjustments between the communities less viable. The seat shortages shown for 2030 illustrate the need for additional elementary schools in both Gypsum and Eagle by 2030. Middle school needs of 200 to 400 are also evident as well as high school needs of 500 to 660 are also clear. A high school of approximately 1,628 would result at Eagle Valley HS thus further justifying a long-‐term plan for campus expansion at that school. The need to fragment into three high schools is not supported through 2030. The school sites that the ECSD currently owns or expects via dedication are well positioned to address elementary school growth. The existing Eagle Valley HS is well-‐positioned to address long term growth.

Neighborhood School

En

roll

20

23

Fun

ctio

nal

Cap

aci

ty

Str

ess

ed

C

ap

aci

ty

20

23

Seats

A

vailab

le

Fun

ctio

nal

20

23

Seats

A

vailab

le

Str

ess

ed

Ad

dit

ion

al

Stu

den

ts b

y 2

03

0

En

roll

20

30

20

30

Seats

A

vailab

le

Fun

ctio

nal

20

30

Seats

A

vailab

le

Str

ess

ed





Figure 26

DRAFT - ECSD Preliminary Facility Scenarios - Demographic Implications - 11/18/15

Scenario Number

School Facility Scenarios Demographic Implications

Demographic Viability Given

Forecasts - Likert Scale (1 = Bad, 5

= Excellent)

EVHS Feeders

EV1

1. Use Gypsum Elementary as part of the High school as ninth grade or similar. Would need replacement for Gypsum Elementary. Could use RHES as a PK-2 and build a new 3-5 on the I-KBAR site across the street from RHES. Then all school feed to GCMS.

Given the seat needs through 2023 at EVHS, this scenario is wise given expected growth at the high school. GVES must be replaced and could benefit

from a new facility. This scenario offers two elementary schools for two elementary schools. The

K-2 / 3-5 grade configuration proposed allows a larger attendance area for the schools and would

balance diversity within the community of Gypsum and enhance the potential for students to move to middle school with their friends. Bus ride times would be slightly longer for the average student.

5

EV2 2. EVES and EVMS remain with major renovations.

These schools are well-positioned to address long-term growth and renovation presents an opportunity

to expand capacity to cover the 145 - 175 elementary school need and 76 - 115 middle school seat need.

Using two schools allows distributing additional student loads across two sites.

4.5

EV3 3. EVES and EVMS are rebuilt as a PK-8.

This scenario presents the same benefits as scenario #2 but consolidates onto a single site. A larger facility would accommodate growth and present

economies of scale, but present some issues concentrating more students in one location. Traffic

and elementary / middle separation issues can challenge K-8 facilities, but benefits of educational

continuity of students potentially having 9 years in a single building tend to off-set. Bus ride times would

be slightly longer for the average student.

4

EV4 4. EVES and EVMS are rebuilt as standalone Elementary and Middle.

Same Benefits as Scenario #2, but with all new space. School renewal benefits are more significant

in a rebuild than in a renovation given the opportunity to redesign the schools.

5

EV5

5. EVES and EVMS are rebuilt with BCES in mix. BCES becomes PK-2 EVES is a 3-5 and EVMS 6-8. Separate buildings.


in a rebuild than in a renovation given the opportunity to redesign the schools. Bus ride times

would be slightly longer for the average student.

4.5

EV6

6. EVES and EVMS are rebuilt with BCES in mix. BCES becomes PK-2, EVES and EVMS become 3-8 in single building.


in a rebuild than in a renovation given the opportunity to redesign the schools. Bus ride times

would be slightly longer for the average student.

4.5

EV7

7. Scenario 2 above with Haymeadow development. What effects on BCES?

Same benefits as Scenario #2. Haymeadow is already in BC/EV/EV and impacts are acceptable

through 2023. 4.5

EV8

8. Scenario 3 above with Haymeadow development. What effects on BCES?

Same benefits as Scenario #3. Haymeadow is already in BC/EV/EV and impacts are acceptable

through 2023. 4

EV9

9. Red Canyon High East. 100 Student Capacity. Effect on EVHS?

A Red Canyon HS addition would draw only 100 students off of EVHS. An addition at EVHS is still

required under all scenarios. 3



Figure 27


Scenario Number




= Excellent)

BMHS Feeders

BM!

1. Renovation of RSES. Increase capacity? Do we keep students on site during construction?

No capacity increase is needed given enrollment trajectory. (3) Facility renewal would benefit all

students. (5) Reconstructing on-site benefits all school populations if off-site transportation and

alternative facility accomodations are avoided. (5)

3/5/5

BM2 2. Rebuild of RSES on same site. Where do we send students?

Probably best to divide student body K-2 / 3-4 and divide the students between two sites. Avon ES, June Creek ES and Edwards ES can accommodate

half of RSES. A single location would require portables or use of alternative space.

3

BM! 3. RSES as PK-2, Avon 3-5.

Benefits of primary specialization at one school and intermediate specialization at another realized. Transportation shell-game between two distinct

communities results.

2

BM3

4. Other options at RSES. What does data show versus what Community wants?

Data shows declining enrollment. 3

Figure 28


Scenario Number




= Excellent)

Other Related Issues:

A1

Location of Administration functions such as maintenance, technology and transit.

When single locations for a specific function are needed, a location between Eagle and Edwards

represents the enrollment centroid of the district. Given growth expectations and the lack of a

community with a high service level in the Wolcott area, centralized services are best located in Eagle. When dual terminals or service centers are possible, an east location centered in Eagle-Vail or Avon and a

west location in Eagle make the most sense.

3



Appendix 1 – Fall 2016 Enrollment Projections

School PK K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total PK-12Avon_ES 39 48 48 51 44 55 45 330Brush_Creek_ES 29 63 62 53 67 81 74 429Eagle_Valley_ES 29 71 70 62 56 61 63 412ECC_Acad_ES 0 38 38 37 38 38 39 228Edwards_ES 14 44 41 44 51 49 47 290Gypsum_ES 38 44 43 48 48 63 76 360Homestake_PK_ES 26 29 30 53 50 50 43 281June_Creek_ES 30 47 44 41 46 53 61 322Red_Hill_ES 26 70 69 50 76 67 54 412Red_Sandstone_ES 14 32 31 30 45 47 36 235Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 1 1 1 3 10Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 20Berry_Creek_MS 117 121 142 380Eagle_Valley_MS 97 122 112 331ECC_Acad_MS 38 38 40 116Gypsum_Creek_MS 127 131 136 394Homestake_Peak_MS 72 76 87 235Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 24 29 74World_Academy_MS 2 2 4 8Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 45 90 174Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 24 22 108Eagle_Valley_HS 253 242 243 183 921World_Academy_HS 0 2 11 13 26Battle_Mountain_HS 242 209 220 219 890Total 265 488 478 470 522 565 551 474 514 550 535 514 543 527 6996

Eagle County School District Fall 2016 Enrollment Projections - Medium Basis - 11/17/15



Appendix 2 – Detailed Projections – 2016 – 2023

Year School PK K 1 2 3 4 5

Tot K

-5

Tot P

K-5

8-yr

Chn

g

Func

tiona

l C

apac

ity

Stre

ssed

C

apac

ity

Seat

s Av

aila

ble

Func

tiona

l

Seat

s Av

aila

ble

Stre

ssed

2016 Avon_ES 39 48 48 51 44 55 45 291 330 443 466 152 1752017 Avon_ES 39 46 47 46 50 47 56 292 331 443 466 151 1742018 Avon_ES 39 44 45 45 46 53 47 280 319 443 466 163 1862019 Avon_ES 39 42 43 43 45 49 54 276 315 443 466 167 1902020 Avon_ES 39 41 42 41 43 48 49 264 303 443 466 179 2022021 Avon_ES 39 39 40 40 41 46 48 254 293 443 466 189 2122022 Avon_ES 39 38 39 38 40 44 46 245 284 443 466 198 2212023 Avon_ES 39 37 37 37 38 42 44 235 274 -17.0% 443 466 208 2312016 Brush_Creek_ES 29 63 62 53 67 81 74 400 429 489 514 89 1142017 Brush_Creek_ES 29 62 61 60 55 68 75 381 410 489 514 108 1332018 Brush_Creek_ES 29 62 61 61 64 57 64 369 398 489 514 120 1452019 Brush_Creek_ES 29 62 61 61 64 66 53 367 396 489 514 122 1472020 Brush_Creek_ES 29 62 61 60 64 66 61 374 403 489 514 115 1402021 Brush_Creek_ES 29 62 61 60 64 66 62 375 404 489 514 114 1392022 Brush_Creek_ES 29 63 61 60 64 66 62 376 405 489 514 113 1382023 Brush_Creek_ES 29 63 62 61 64 66 62 378 407 -5.1% 489 514 111 1362016 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 71 70 62 56 61 63 383 412 409 430 26 472017 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 73 73 72 65 58 64 405 434 409 430 4 252018 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 75 75 75 75 67 61 428 457 409 430 (19) 22019 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 78 78 78 78 77 70 459 488 409 430 (50) (29)2020 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 80 80 80 81 80 80 481 510 409 430 (72) (51)2021 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 83 82 82 83 82 83 495 524 409 430 (86) (65)2022 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 86 85 84 85 85 85 510 539 409 430 (101) (80)2023 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 89 88 87 87 87 87 525 554 34.5% 409 430 (116) (95)2016 ECC_Acad_ES 0 38 38 37 38 38 39 228 2282017 ECC_Acad_ES 0 37 37 36 37 37 38 222 2222018 ECC_Acad_ES 0 36 37 36 36 37 38 220 2202019 ECC_Acad_ES 0 36 36 35 35 35 37 214 2142020 ECC_Acad_ES 0 35 35 34 35 35 36 210 2102021 ECC_Acad_ES 0 35 35 34 34 34 35 207 2072022 ECC_Acad_ES 0 34 34 33 34 34 35 204 2042023 ECC_Acad_ES 0 34 34 33 33 33 34 201 201 -11.8%2016 Edwards_ES 14 44 41 44 51 49 47 276 290 459 483 183 2072017 Edwards_ES 14 42 40 41 45 49 47 264 278 459 483 195 2192018 Edwards_ES 14 41 39 40 42 43 47 252 266 459 483 207 2312019 Edwards_ES 14 39 38 39 41 40 41 238 252 459 483 221 2452020 Edwards_ES 14 38 36 37 39 39 38 227 241 459 483 232 2562021 Edwards_ES 14 38 36 37 39 38 37 225 239 459 483 234 2582022 Edwards_ES 14 36 34 35 37 37 36 215 229 459 483 244 2682023 Edwards_ES 14 35 33 34 36 35 34 207 221 -23.8% 459 483 252 2762016 Gypsum_ES 38 44 43 48 48 63 76 322 360 444 468 122 1462017 Gypsum_ES 38 44 43 42 49 48 64 290 328 444 468 154 1782018 Gypsum_ES 38 45 44 43 43 50 49 274 312 444 468 170 1942019 Gypsum_ES 38 45 44 43 44 44 50 270 308 444 468 174 1982020 Gypsum_ES 38 45 45 44 44 44 44 266 304 444 468 178 2022021 Gypsum_ES 38 47 46 45 45 45 46 274 312 444 468 170 1942022 Gypsum_ES 38 47 46 45 45 46 46 275 313 444 468 169 1932023 Gypsum_ES 38 49 48 46 46 47 47 283 321 -10.8% 444 468 161 1852016 Homestake_PK_ES 26 29 30 53 50 50 43 255 281 433 510 178 2552017 Homestake_PK_ES 26 32 34 32 61 51 54 264 290 433 510 169 2462018 Homestake_PK_ES 26 32 33 31 36 58 50 240 266 433 510 193 2702019 Homestake_PK_ES 26 32 34 32 37 35 59 229 255 433 510 204 2812020 Homestake_PK_ES 26 33 34 32 37 36 36 208 234 433 510 225 3022021 Homestake_PK_ES 26 33 35 33 38 36 36 211 237 433 510 222 2992022 Homestake_PK_ES 26 34 35 33 38 37 37 214 240 433 510 219 2962023 Homestake_PK_ES 26 34 35 33 38 36 36 212 238 -15.3% 433 510 221 2982016 June_Creek_ES 30 47 44 41 46 53 61 292 322 387 408 95 1162017 June_Creek_ES 30 46 43 42 39 46 53 269 299 387 408 118 1392018 June_Creek_ES 30 45 43 41 40 40 46 255 285 387 408 132 1532019 June_Creek_ES 30 44 42 40 40 41 40 247 277 387 408 140 1612020 June_Creek_ES 30 44 42 41 40 42 42 251 281 387 408 136 1572021 June_Creek_ES 30 44 41 40 40 41 42 248 278 387 408 139 1602022 June_Creek_ES 30 43 41 39 39 40 41 243 273 387 408 144 1652023 June_Creek_ES 30 43 41 39 38 40 40 241 271 -15.8% 387 408 146 1672016 Red_Hill_ES 26 70 69 50 76 67 54 386 412 425 448 39 622017 Red_Hill_ES 26 71 70 65 55 77 67 405 431 425 448 20 432018 Red_Hill_ES 26 72 71 67 70 56 77 413 439 425 448 12 352019 Red_Hill_ES 26 73 72 68 71 71 55 410 436 425 448 15 382020 Red_Hill_ES 26 73 72 68 71 71 69 424 450 425 448 1 242021 Red_Hill_ES 26 74 73 69 72 72 71 431 457 425 448 (6) 17

ECSD - 8-year Elementary Forecast - LOW 11/16/15




Tot K

-5

Tot P

K-5

8-yr

Chn

g

Func

tiona

l C

apac

ity

Stre

ssed

C

apac

ity

Seat

s Av

aila

ble

Func

tiona

l

Seat

s Av

aila

ble

Stre

ssed

ECSD - 8-year Elementary Forecast - LOW 11/16/15

2022 Red_Hill_ES 26 75 74 70 73 73 72 437 463 425 448 (12) 112023 Red_Hill_ES 26 77 75 71 74 74 73 444 470 14.1% 425 448 (19) 42016 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 32 31 30 45 47 36 221 235 247 260 26 392017 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 31 31 31 30 44 47 214 228 247 260 33 462018 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 31 30 31 32 30 43 197 211 247 260 50 632019 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 30 30 30 31 31 30 182 196 247 260 65 782020 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 29 29 30 31 31 31 181 195 247 260 66 792021 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 29 29 29 30 30 31 178 192 247 260 69 822022 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 29 29 28 30 30 30 176 190 247 260 71 842023 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 29 28 28 29 29 29 172 186 -20.9% 247 260 75 882016 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 370 4352017 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 370 4352018 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 370 4352019 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 370 4352020 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 370 4352021 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 370 4352022 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 370 4352023 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 -10.0% 370 4352016 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 1 1 1 3 10 102017 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 9 92018 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 1 1 10 102019 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 1 11 112020 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 122021 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 122022 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 122023 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 12 20.0%2016 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202017 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202018 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202019 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202020 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202021 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202022 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202023 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202016 Adjusted Totals 265 488 478 470 522 565 551 3074 33392017 Adjusted Totals 265 486 481 469 487 526 576 3025 32902018 Adjusted Totals 265 485 480 472 486 492 533 2948 32132019 Adjusted Totals 265 483 480 471 488 491 499 2912 31772020 Adjusted Totals 265 482 478 469 487 494 497 2907 31722021 Adjusted Totals 265 486 480 471 488 492 502 2919 31842022 Adjusted Totals 265 487 480 467 487 494 501 2916 31812023 Adjusted Totals 265 492 483 471 485 491 497 2919 3184



Year School 6 7 8 Total 8-yr Chng

Func

tiona

l Cap

acity

Stre

ssed

Cap

acity

Seat

s Ava

ilabl

e Fu

nctio

nal

Seat

s Ava

ilabl

e St

ress

ed

2016 Berry_Creek_MS 117 121 142 380 466 548 86 1682017 Berry_Creek_MS 137 117 122 376 466 548 90 1722018 Berry_Creek_MS 134 138 119 391 466 548 75 1572019 Berry_Creek_MS 117 137 142 396 466 548 70 1522020 Berry_Creek_MS 109 117 138 364 466 548 102 1842021 Berry_Creek_MS 105 111 119 335 466 548 131 2132022 Berry_Creek_MS 104 107 113 324 466 548 142 2242023 Berry_Creek_MS 102 105 104 311 -18.16% 466 548 155 2372016 Eagle_Valley_MS 97 122 112 331 379 446 48 1152017 Eagle_Valley_MS 135 93 125 353 379 446 26 932018 Eagle_Valley_MS 139 133 98 370 379 446 9 762019 Eagle_Valley_MS 128 137 138 403 379 446 (24) 432020 Eagle_Valley_MS 129 127 143 399 379 446 (20) 472021 Eagle_Valley_MS 149 126 132 407 379 446 (28) 392022 Eagle_Valley_MS 152 146 132 430 379 446 (51) 162023 Eagle_Valley_MS 156 151 148 455 37.46% 379 446 (76) (9)2016 ECC_Acad_MS 38 38 40 1162017 ECC_Acad_MS 38 38 38 1142018 ECC_Acad_MS 39 38 38 1152019 ECC_Acad_MS 39 39 38 1162020 ECC_Acad_MS 39 39 38 1162021 ECC_Acad_MS 38 39 39 1162022 ECC_Acad_MS 37 38 39 1142023 ECC_Acad_MS 37 38 36 111 -4.31%2016 Gypsum_Creek_MS 126 130 135 391 464 546 73 1552017 Gypsum_Creek_MS 145 125 136 406 464 546 58 1402018 Gypsum_Creek_MS 148 145 132 425 464 546 39 1212019 Gypsum_Creek_MS 144 147 152 443 464 546 21 1032020 Gypsum_Creek_MS 123 143 154 420 464 546 44 1262021 Gypsum_Creek_MS 131 122 150 403 464 546 61 1432022 Gypsum_Creek_MS 133 130 129 392 464 546 72 1542023 Gypsum_Creek_MS 133 132 132 397 1.53% 464 546 67 1492016 Homestake_Peak_MS 72 76 87 235 220 258 (15) 232017 Homestake_Peak_MS 82 74 81 237 220 258 (17) 212018 Homestake_Peak_MS 102 81 75 258 220 258 (38) 02019 Homestake_Peak_MS 96 100 81 277 220 258 (57) (19)2020 Homestake_Peak_MS 90 94 101 285 220 258 (65) (27)2021 Homestake_Peak_MS 66 88 94 248 220 258 (28) 102022 Homestake_Peak_MS 66 64 88 218 220 258 2 402023 Homestake_Peak_MS 67 65 83 215 -8.51% 220 258 5 432016 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 24 29 74 370 4352017 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 24 32 77 370 4352018 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 25 32 78 370 4352019 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 25 32 78 370 4352020 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 25 32 78 370 4352021 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 20 24 33 77 370 4352022 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 20 24 32 76 370 4352023 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 20 23 29 72 -2.70% 370 4352016 World_Academy_MS 2 2 4 82017 World_Academy_MS 4 2 5 112018 World_Academy_MS 2 4 5 112019 World_Academy_MS 2 2 7 112020 World_Academy_MS 2 2 5 92021 World_Academy_MS 3 2 5 102022 World_Academy_MS 3 3 5 112023 World_Academy_MS 3 3 6 12 50.00%2016 Adjusted Totals 473 513 549 15352017 Adjusted Totals 562 473 539 15742018 Adjusted Totals 585 564 499 16482019 Adjusted Totals 547 587 590 17242020 Adjusted Totals 513 547 611 16712021 Adjusted Totals 512 512 572 15962022 Adjusted Totals 515 512 538 15652023 Adjusted Totals 518 517 538 1573 2.48%

ECSD - 8-year Middle School Forecast - LOW - 11/16/15



Year School 9 10 11 12 Total 8-yr Chng

Func

tiona

l C

apac

ity

Stre

ssed

C

apac

ity

Seat

s Ava

ilabl

e Fu

nctio

nal

Seat

s Ava

ilabl

e St

ress

ed

2016 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 45 90 174 164 193 (10) 192017 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 89 172 164 193 (8) 212018 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232019 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232020 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232021 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232022 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232023 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 -2.3% 164 193 (6) 232016 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 24 22 108 370 4352017 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 23 111 370 4352018 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 26 114 370 4352019 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 25 113 370 4352020 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 26 114 370 4352021 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 25 113 370 4352022 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 25 113 370 4352023 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 26 114 5.6% 370 4352016 Eagle_Valley_HS 253 242 243 183 921 968 1139 47 2182017 Eagle_Valley_HS 260 253 242 239 994 968 1139 -26 1452018 Eagle_Valley_HS 281 261 254 239 1035 968 1139 (67) 1042019 Eagle_Valley_HS 258 283 263 252 1056 968 1139 (88) 832020 Eagle_Valley_HS 319 260 285 261 1125 968 1139 (157) 142021 Eagle_Valley_HS 324 320 262 283 1189 968 1139 (221) (50)2022 Eagle_Valley_HS 309 326 322 261 1218 968 1139 (250) (79)2023 Eagle_Valley_HS 293 310 327 320 1250 35.7% 968 1139 (282) (111)2016 World_Academy_HS 0 2 11 13 262017 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 16 262018 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232019 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232020 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232021 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232022 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232023 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 23 -11.5%2016 Battle_Mountain_HS 242 209 220 219 890 1169 1375 279 4852017 Battle_Mountain_HS 261 240 199 239 939 1169 1375 230 4362018 Battle_Mountain_HS 227 256 226 214 923 1169 1375 246 4522019 Battle_Mountain_HS 210 224 245 244 923 1169 1375 246 4522020 Battle_Mountain_HS 237 205 211 260 913 1169 1375 256 4622021 Battle_Mountain_HS 254 234 193 227 908 1169 1375 261 4672022 Battle_Mountain_HS 229 250 222 209 910 1169 1375 259 4652023 Battle_Mountain_HS 209 224 237 237 907 1.9% 1169 1375 262 4682016 Adjusted Totals 535 514 543 527 21192017 Adjusted Totals 561 556 519 606 22422018 Adjusted Totals 548 580 558 579 22652019 Adjusted Totals 508 570 586 621 22852020 Adjusted Totals 596 528 574 647 23452021 Adjusted Totals 618 617 533 635 24032022 Adjusted Totals 578 639 622 595 24342023 Adjusted Totals 542 597 642 683 2464 16.3%

ECSD - 8-year High School Forecast - LOW - 11/16/15




Tot K

-5

Tot P

K-5

8-yr

Chn

g

Func

tiona

l C

apac

ity

Stre

ssed

C

apac

ity

Seat

s A

vaila

ble

Func

tiona

l

Seat

s A

vaila

ble

Stre

ssed

2016 Avon_ES 39 48 48 51 44 55 45 291 330 443 466 152 1752017 Avon_ES 39 46 47 46 50 47 56 292 331 443 466 151 1742018 Avon_ES 39 44 45 45 46 53 47 280 319 443 466 163 1862019 Avon_ES 39 42 43 43 45 49 54 276 315 443 466 167 1902020 Avon_ES 39 41 42 41 43 48 49 264 303 443 466 179 2022021 Avon_ES 39 39 40 40 41 46 48 254 293 443 466 189 2122022 Avon_ES 39 38 39 38 40 44 46 245 284 443 466 198 2212023 Avon_ES 39 37 37 37 38 42 44 235 274 -17.0% 443 466 208 2312016 Brush_Creek_ES 29 63 62 53 67 81 74 400 429 489 514 89 1142017 Brush_Creek_ES 29 62 61 60 55 68 75 381 410 489 514 108 1332018 Brush_Creek_ES 29 62 61 61 64 57 64 369 398 489 514 120 1452019 Brush_Creek_ES 29 62 61 61 64 66 53 367 396 489 514 122 1472020 Brush_Creek_ES 29 63 62 61 65 67 62 380 409 489 514 109 1342021 Brush_Creek_ES 29 64 63 62 66 68 64 387 416 489 514 102 1272022 Brush_Creek_ES 29 65 63 62 66 68 64 388 417 489 514 101 1262023 Brush_Creek_ES 29 66 65 64 67 69 65 396 425 -0.9% 489 514 93 1182016 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 71 70 62 56 61 63 383 412 409 430 26 472017 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 73 73 72 65 58 64 405 434 409 430 4 252018 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 75 75 75 75 67 61 428 457 409 430 (19) 22019 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 78 78 78 78 77 70 459 488 409 430 (50) (29)2020 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 80 80 80 81 80 80 481 510 409 430 (72) (51)2021 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 84 83 83 84 83 84 501 530 409 430 (92) (71)2022 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 87 86 85 86 86 86 516 545 409 430 (107) (86)2023 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 91 90 89 89 89 89 537 566 37.4% 409 430 (128) (107)2016 ECC_Acad_ES 0 38 38 37 38 38 39 228 2282017 ECC_Acad_ES 0 37 37 36 37 37 38 222 2222018 ECC_Acad_ES 0 36 37 36 36 37 38 220 2202019 ECC_Acad_ES 0 36 36 35 35 35 37 214 2142020 ECC_Acad_ES 0 35 35 34 35 35 36 210 2102021 ECC_Acad_ES 0 35 35 34 34 34 35 207 2072022 ECC_Acad_ES 0 34 34 33 34 34 35 204 2042023 ECC_Acad_ES 0 34 34 33 33 33 34 201 201 -11.8%2016 Edwards_ES 14 44 41 44 51 49 47 276 290 459 483 183 2072017 Edwards_ES 14 42 40 41 45 49 47 264 278 459 483 195 2192018 Edwards_ES 14 41 39 40 42 43 47 252 266 459 483 207 2312019 Edwards_ES 14 39 38 39 41 40 41 238 252 459 483 221 2452020 Edwards_ES 14 39 37 38 40 40 39 233 247 459 483 226 2502021 Edwards_ES 14 38 36 37 39 38 37 225 239 459 483 234 2582022 Edwards_ES 14 37 35 36 38 38 37 221 235 459 483 238 2622023 Edwards_ES 14 36 34 35 37 36 35 213 227 -21.7% 459 483 246 2702016 Gypsum_ES 38 44 43 48 48 63 76 322 360 444 468 122 1462017 Gypsum_ES 38 44 43 42 49 48 64 290 328 444 468 154 1782018 Gypsum_ES 38 45 44 43 43 50 49 274 312 444 468 170 1942019 Gypsum_ES 38 45 44 43 44 44 50 270 308 444 468 174 1982020 Gypsum_ES 38 46 46 45 45 45 45 272 310 444 468 172 1962021 Gypsum_ES 38 47 46 45 45 45 46 274 312 444 468 170 1942022 Gypsum_ES 38 48 47 46 46 47 47 281 319 444 468 163 1872023 Gypsum_ES 38 49 48 46 46 47 47 283 321 -10.8% 444 468 161 1852016 Homestake_PK_ES 26 29 30 53 50 50 43 255 281 433 510 178 2552017 Homestake_PK_ES 26 32 34 32 61 51 54 264 290 433 510 169 2462018 Homestake_PK_ES 26 32 33 31 36 58 50 240 266 433 510 193 2702019 Homestake_PK_ES 26 32 34 32 37 35 59 229 255 433 510 204 2812020 Homestake_PK_ES 26 34 35 33 38 37 37 214 240 433 510 219 2962021 Homestake_PK_ES 26 34 36 34 39 37 37 217 243 433 510 216 2932022 Homestake_PK_ES 26 35 36 34 39 38 38 220 246 433 510 213 2902023 Homestake_PK_ES 26 37 38 36 41 39 39 230 256 -8.9% 433 510 203 2802016 June_Creek_ES 30 47 44 41 46 53 61 292 322 387 408 95 1162017 June_Creek_ES 30 46 43 42 39 46 53 269 299 387 408 118 1392018 June_Creek_ES 30 45 43 41 40 40 46 255 285 387 408 132 1532019 June_Creek_ES 30 44 42 40 40 41 40 247 277 387 408 140 1612020 June_Creek_ES 30 44 42 41 40 42 42 251 281 387 408 136 1572021 June_Creek_ES 30 44 41 40 40 41 42 248 278 387 408 139 1602022 June_Creek_ES 30 43 41 39 39 40 41 243 273 387 408 144 1652023 June_Creek_ES 30 44 42 40 39 41 41 247 277 -14.0% 387 408 140 1612016 Red_Hill_ES 26 70 69 50 76 67 54 386 412 425 448 39 622017 Red_Hill_ES 26 71 70 65 55 77 67 405 431 425 448 20 432018 Red_Hill_ES 26 72 71 67 70 56 77 413 439 425 448 12 352019 Red_Hill_ES 26 74 73 69 72 72 56 416 442 425 448 9 322020 Red_Hill_ES 26 75 74 70 73 73 71 436 462 425 448 -11 122021 Red_Hill_ES 26 77 76 72 75 75 74 449 475 425 448 (24) (1)

ECSD - 8-year Elementary Forecast - MEDIUM 11/16/15




Tot K

-5

Tot P

K-5

8-yr

Chn

g

Func

tiona

l C

apac

ity

Stre

ssed

C

apac

ity

Seat

s A

vaila

ble

Func

tiona

l

Seat

s A

vaila

ble

Stre

ssed

ECSD - 8-year Elementary Forecast - MEDIUM 11/16/15

2022 Red_Hill_ES 26 79 78 74 77 77 76 461 487 425 448 (36) (13)2023 Red_Hill_ES 26 82 80 76 79 79 78 474 500 21.4% 425 448 (49) (26)2016 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 32 31 30 45 47 36 221 235 247 260 26 392017 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 31 31 31 30 44 47 214 228 247 260 33 462018 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 31 30 31 32 30 43 197 211 247 260 50 632019 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 30 30 30 31 31 30 182 196 247 260 65 782020 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 29 29 30 31 31 31 181 195 247 260 66 792021 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 29 29 29 30 30 31 178 192 247 260 69 822022 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 29 29 28 30 30 30 176 190 247 260 71 842023 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 29 28 28 29 29 29 172 186 -20.9% 247 260 75 882016 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 370 4352017 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 370 4352018 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 370 4352019 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 370 4352020 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 370 4352021 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 370 4352022 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 370 4352023 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 -10.0% 370 4352016 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 1 1 1 3 10 102017 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 9 92018 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 1 1 10 102019 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 1 11 112020 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 122021 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 122022 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 122023 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 12 20.0%2016 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202017 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202018 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202019 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202020 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202021 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202022 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202023 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202016 Adjusted Totals 265 488 478 470 522 565 551 3074 33392017 Adjusted Totals 265 486 481 469 487 526 576 3025 32902018 Adjusted Totals 265 485 480 472 486 492 533 2948 32132019 Adjusted Totals 265 484 481 472 489 492 500 2918 31832020 Adjusted Totals 265 488 484 475 493 500 503 2943 32082021 Adjusted Totals 265 493 487 478 495 499 509 2961 32262022 Adjusted Totals 265 497 490 477 497 504 511 2976 32412023 Adjusted Totals 265 507 498 486 500 506 512 3009 3274




Func

tiona

l Cap

acity

Stre

ssed

Cap

acity

Seat

s Ava

ilabl

e Fu

nctio

nal

Seat

s Ava

ilabl

e St

ress

ed

2016 Berry_Creek_MS 117 121 142 380 466 548 86 1682017 Berry_Creek_MS 137 117 122 376 466 548 90 1722018 Berry_Creek_MS 134 138 119 391 466 548 75 1572019 Berry_Creek_MS 117 137 142 396 466 548 70 1522020 Berry_Creek_MS 110 118 139 367 466 548 99 1812021 Berry_Creek_MS 107 113 121 341 466 548 125 2072022 Berry_Creek_MS 105 108 114 327 466 548 139 2212023 Berry_Creek_MS 104 107 106 317 -16.58% 466 548 149 2312016 Eagle_Valley_MS 97 122 112 331 379 446 48 1152017 Eagle_Valley_MS 135 93 125 353 379 446 26 932018 Eagle_Valley_MS 139 133 98 370 379 446 9 762019 Eagle_Valley_MS 129 138 139 406 379 446 (27) 402020 Eagle_Valley_MS 131 129 145 405 379 446 (26) 412021 Eagle_Valley_MS 153 130 136 419 379 446 (40) 272022 Eagle_Valley_MS 157 151 137 445 379 446 (66) 12023 Eagle_Valley_MS 161 156 153 470 41.99% 379 446 (91) (24)2016 ECC_Acad_MS 38 38 40 1162017 ECC_Acad_MS 38 38 38 1142018 ECC_Acad_MS 39 38 38 1152019 ECC_Acad_MS 39 39 38 1162020 ECC_Acad_MS 39 39 38 1162021 ECC_Acad_MS 38 39 39 1162022 ECC_Acad_MS 37 38 39 1142023 ECC_Acad_MS 37 38 36 111 -4.31%2016 Gypsum_Creek_MS 127 131 136 394 464 546 70 1522017 Gypsum_Creek_MS 146 126 137 409 464 546 55 1372018 Gypsum_Creek_MS 149 146 133 428 464 546 36 1182019 Gypsum_Creek_MS 145 148 153 446 464 546 18 1002020 Gypsum_Creek_MS 124 144 155 423 464 546 41 1232021 Gypsum_Creek_MS 133 124 152 409 464 546 55 1372022 Gypsum_Creek_MS 137 134 133 404 464 546 60 1422023 Gypsum_Creek_MS 138 137 137 412 4.57% 464 546 52 1342016 Homestake_Peak_MS 72 76 87 235 220 258 (15) 232017 Homestake_Peak_MS 82 74 81 237 220 258 (17) 212018 Homestake_Peak_MS 102 81 75 258 220 258 (38) 02019 Homestake_Peak_MS 96 100 81 277 220 258 (57) (19)2020 Homestake_Peak_MS 91 95 102 288 220 258 (68) (30)2021 Homestake_Peak_MS 68 90 96 254 220 258 (34) 42022 Homestake_Peak_MS 68 66 90 224 220 258 (4) 342023 Homestake_Peak_MS 70 68 86 224 -4.68% 220 258 (4) 342016 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 24 29 74 370 4352017 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 24 32 77 370 4352018 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 25 32 78 370 4352019 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 25 32 78 370 4352020 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 25 32 78 370 4352021 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 20 24 33 77 370 4352022 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 20 24 32 76 370 4352023 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 20 23 29 72 -2.70% 370 4352016 World_Academy_MS 2 2 4 82017 World_Academy_MS 4 2 5 112018 World_Academy_MS 2 4 5 112019 World_Academy_MS 2 2 7 112020 World_Academy_MS 2 2 5 92021 World_Academy_MS 3 2 5 102022 World_Academy_MS 3 3 5 112023 World_Academy_MS 3 3 6 12 50.00%2016 Adjusted Totals 474 514 550 15382017 Adjusted Totals 563 474 540 15772018 Adjusted Totals 586 565 500 16512019 Adjusted Totals 549 589 592 17302020 Adjusted Totals 518 552 616 16862021 Adjusted Totals 522 522 582 16262022 Adjusted Totals 527 524 550 16012023 Adjusted Totals 533 532 553 1618 5.20%

ECSD - 8-year Middle School Forecast - MEDIUM - 11/16/15




Func

tiona

l C

apac

ity

Stre

ssed

C

apac

ity

Seat

s Ava

ilabl

e Fu

nctio

nal

Seat

s Ava

ilabl

e St

ress

ed

2016 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 45 90 174 164 193 (10) 192017 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 89 172 164 193 (8) 212018 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232019 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232020 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232021 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232022 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232023 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 -2.3% 164 193 (6) 232016 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 24 22 108 370 4352017 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 23 111 370 4352018 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 26 114 370 4352019 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 25 113 370 4352020 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 26 114 370 4352021 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 25 113 370 4352022 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 25 113 370 4352023 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 26 114 5.6% 370 4352016 Eagle_Valley_HS 253 242 243 183 921 968 1139 47 2182017 Eagle_Valley_HS 260 253 242 239 994 968 1139 -26 1452018 Eagle_Valley_HS 282 262 255 240 1039 968 1139 (71) 1002019 Eagle_Valley_HS 261 286 266 255 1068 968 1139 (100) 712020 Eagle_Valley_HS 322 263 288 264 1137 968 1139 (169) 22021 Eagle_Valley_HS 328 324 266 287 1205 968 1139 (237) (66)2022 Eagle_Valley_HS 316 333 329 268 1246 968 1139 (278) (107)2023 Eagle_Valley_HS 302 319 336 329 1286 39.6% 968 1139 (318) (147)2016 World_Academy_HS 0 2 11 13 262017 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 16 262018 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232019 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232020 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232021 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232022 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232023 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 23 -11.5%2016 Battle_Mountain_HS 242 209 220 219 890 1169 1375 279 4852017 Battle_Mountain_HS 261 240 199 239 939 1169 1375 230 4362018 Battle_Mountain_HS 227 256 226 214 923 1169 1375 246 4522019 Battle_Mountain_HS 210 224 245 244 923 1169 1375 246 4522020 Battle_Mountain_HS 239 207 213 262 921 1169 1375 248 4542021 Battle_Mountain_HS 257 237 196 230 920 1169 1375 249 4552022 Battle_Mountain_HS 233 254 226 213 926 1169 1375 243 4492023 Battle_Mountain_HS 214 229 242 242 927 4.2% 1169 1375 242 4482016 Adjusted Totals 535 514 543 527 21192017 Adjusted Totals 561 556 519 606 22422018 Adjusted Totals 549 581 559 580 22692019 Adjusted Totals 511 573 589 624 22972020 Adjusted Totals 601 533 579 652 23652021 Adjusted Totals 625 624 540 642 24312022 Adjusted Totals 589 650 633 606 24782023 Adjusted Totals 556 611 656 697 2520 18.9%

ECSD - 8-year High School Forecast - MEDIUM - 11/16/15




Tot K

-5

Tot P

K-5

8-yr

Chn

g

Func

tiona

l C

apac

ity

Stre

ssed

C

apac

ity

Seat

s A

vaila

ble

Func

tiona

l

Seat

s A

vaila

ble

Stre

ssed

2016 Avon_ES 39 48 48 51 44 55 45 291 330 443 466 152 1752017 Avon_ES 39 46 47 46 50 47 56 292 331 443 466 151 1742018 Avon_ES 39 44 45 45 46 53 47 280 319 443 466 163 1862019 Avon_ES 39 42 43 43 45 49 54 276 315 443 466 167 1902020 Avon_ES 39 41 42 41 43 48 49 264 303 443 466 179 2022021 Avon_ES 39 39 40 40 41 46 48 254 293 443 466 189 2122022 Avon_ES 39 38 39 38 40 44 46 245 284 443 466 198 2212023 Avon_ES 39 37 37 37 38 42 44 235 274 -17.0% 443 466 208 2312016 Brush_Creek_ES 29 62 61 52 66 80 73 394 423 489 514 95 1202017 Brush_Creek_ES 29 62 61 60 55 68 75 381 410 489 514 108 1332018 Brush_Creek_ES 29 63 62 62 65 58 65 375 404 489 514 114 1392019 Brush_Creek_ES 29 63 62 62 65 67 54 373 402 489 514 116 1412020 Brush_Creek_ES 29 65 64 63 67 69 64 392 421 489 514 97 1222021 Brush_Creek_ES 29 66 65 64 68 70 66 399 428 489 514 90 1152022 Brush_Creek_ES 29 68 66 65 69 71 67 406 435 489 514 83 1082023 Brush_Creek_ES 29 69 68 67 70 72 68 414 443 4.7% 489 514 75 1002016 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 71 70 62 56 61 63 383 412 409 430 26 472017 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 73 73 72 65 58 64 405 434 409 430 4 252018 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 75 75 75 75 67 61 428 457 409 430 (19) 22019 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 79 79 79 79 78 71 465 494 409 430 (56) (35)2020 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 82 82 82 83 82 82 493 522 409 430 (84) (63)2021 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 86 85 85 86 85 86 513 542 409 430 (104) (83)2022 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 90 89 88 89 89 89 534 563 409 430 (125) (104)2023 Eagle_Valley_ES 29 94 93 92 92 92 92 555 584 41.7% 409 430 (146) (125)2016 ECC_Acad_ES 0 38 38 37 38 38 39 228 2282017 ECC_Acad_ES 0 37 37 36 37 37 38 222 2222018 ECC_Acad_ES 0 36 37 36 36 37 38 220 2202019 ECC_Acad_ES 0 36 36 35 35 35 37 214 2142020 ECC_Acad_ES 0 35 35 34 35 35 36 210 2102021 ECC_Acad_ES 0 35 35 34 34 34 35 207 2072022 ECC_Acad_ES 0 34 34 33 34 34 35 204 2042023 ECC_Acad_ES 0 34 34 33 33 33 34 201 201 -11.8%2016 Edwards_ES 14 44 41 44 51 49 47 276 290 459 483 183 2072017 Edwards_ES 14 42 40 41 45 49 47 264 278 459 483 195 2192018 Edwards_ES 14 41 39 40 42 43 47 252 266 459 483 207 2312019 Edwards_ES 14 40 39 40 42 41 42 244 258 459 483 215 2392020 Edwards_ES 14 39 37 38 40 40 39 233 247 459 483 226 2502021 Edwards_ES 14 39 37 38 40 39 38 231 245 459 483 228 2522022 Edwards_ES 14 38 36 37 39 39 38 227 241 459 483 232 2562023 Edwards_ES 14 37 35 36 38 37 36 219 233 -19.7% 459 483 240 2642016 Gypsum_ES 38 42 41 46 46 61 74 310 348 444 468 134 1582017 Gypsum_ES 38 43 42 41 48 47 63 284 322 444 468 160 1842018 Gypsum_ES 38 45 44 43 43 50 49 274 312 444 468 170 1942019 Gypsum_ES 38 46 45 44 45 45 51 276 314 444 468 168 1922020 Gypsum_ES 38 46 46 45 45 45 45 272 310 444 468 172 1962021 Gypsum_ES 38 48 47 46 46 46 47 280 318 444 468 164 1882022 Gypsum_ES 38 49 48 47 47 48 48 287 325 444 468 157 1812023 Gypsum_ES 38 50 49 47 47 48 48 289 327 -6.0% 444 468 155 1792016 Homestake_PK_ES 26 29 30 53 50 50 43 255 281 433 510 178 2552017 Homestake_PK_ES 26 31 33 31 60 50 53 258 284 433 510 175 2522018 Homestake_PK_ES 26 34 35 33 38 60 52 252 278 433 510 181 2582019 Homestake_PK_ES 26 34 36 34 39 37 61 241 267 433 510 192 2692020 Homestake_PK_ES 26 36 37 35 40 39 39 226 252 433 510 207 2842021 Homestake_PK_ES 26 36 38 36 41 39 39 229 255 433 510 204 2812022 Homestake_PK_ES 26 38 39 37 42 41 41 238 264 433 510 195 2722023 Homestake_PK_ES 26 40 41 39 44 42 42 248 274 -2.5% 433 510 185 2622016 June_Creek_ES 30 47 44 41 46 53 61 292 322 387 408 95 1162017 June_Creek_ES 30 46 43 42 39 46 53 269 299 387 408 118 1392018 June_Creek_ES 30 45 43 41 40 40 46 255 285 387 408 132 1532019 June_Creek_ES 30 45 43 41 41 42 41 253 283 387 408 134 1552020 June_Creek_ES 30 44 42 41 40 42 42 251 281 387 408 136 1572021 June_Creek_ES 30 45 42 41 41 42 43 254 284 387 408 133 1542022 June_Creek_ES 30 44 42 40 40 41 42 249 279 387 408 138 1592023 June_Creek_ES 30 44 42 40 39 41 41 247 277 -14.0% 387 408 140 1612016 Red_Hill_ES 26 66 65 46 72 63 50 362 388 425 448 63 862017 Red_Hill_ES 26 68 67 62 52 74 64 387 413 425 448 38 612018 Red_Hill_ES 26 74 73 69 72 58 79 425 451 425 448 0 232019 Red_Hill_ES 26 76 75 71 74 74 58 428 454 425 448 -3 202020 Red_Hill_ES 26 79 78 74 77 77 75 460 486 425 448 -35 -122021 Red_Hill_ES 26 82 81 77 80 80 79 479 505 425 448 (54) (31)

ECSD - 8-year Elementary Forecast - HIGH - 11/16/15




Tot K

-5

Tot P

K-5

8-yr

Chn

g

Func

tiona

l C

apac

ity

Stre

ssed

C

apac

ity

Seat

s A

vaila

ble

Func

tiona

l

Seat

s A

vaila

ble

Stre

ssed

ECSD - 8-year Elementary Forecast - HIGH - 11/16/15

2022 Red_Hill_ES 26 84 83 79 82 82 81 491 517 425 448 (66) (43)2023 Red_Hill_ES 26 88 86 82 85 85 84 510 536 38.1% 425 448 (85) (62)2016 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 32 31 30 45 47 36 221 235 247 260 26 392017 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 31 31 31 30 44 47 214 228 247 260 33 462018 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 31 30 31 32 30 43 197 211 247 260 50 632019 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 30 30 30 31 31 30 182 196 247 260 65 782020 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 29 29 30 31 31 31 181 195 247 260 66 792021 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 29 29 29 30 30 31 178 192 247 260 69 822022 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 29 29 28 30 30 30 176 190 247 260 71 842023 Red_Sandstone_ES 14 29 28 28 29 29 29 172 186 -20.9% 247 260 75 882016 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 370 4352017 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 370 4352018 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 370 4352019 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 370 4352020 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 370 4352021 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 370 4352022 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 370 4352023 Vail_Ski_Snow_ES 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 -10.0% 370 4352016 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 1 1 1 3 10 102017 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 9 92018 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 1 1 10 102019 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 1 11 112020 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 122021 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 122022 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 122023 World_Academy_ES 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 12 20.0%2016 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202017 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202018 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202019 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202020 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202021 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202022 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202023 Family Learning Center PK 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202016 Adjusted Totals 265 481 471 463 515 558 544 3032 32972017 Adjusted Totals 265 481 476 464 482 521 571 2995 32602018 Adjusted Totals 265 490 485 477 491 497 538 2978 32432019 Adjusted Totals 265 493 490 481 498 501 509 2972 32372020 Adjusted Totals 265 498 494 485 503 510 513 3003 32682021 Adjusted Totals 265 507 501 492 509 513 523 3045 33102022 Adjusted Totals 265 514 507 494 514 521 528 3078 33432023 Adjusted Totals 265 524 515 503 517 523 529 3111 3376




Func

tiona

l Cap

acity

Stre

ssed

Cap

acity

Seat

s Ava

ilabl

e Fu

nctio

nal

Seat

s Ava

ilabl

e St

ress

ed

2016 Berry_Creek_MS 117 121 142 380 466 548 86 1682017 Berry_Creek_MS 137 117 122 376 466 548 90 1722018 Berry_Creek_MS 135 139 120 394 466 548 72 1542019 Berry_Creek_MS 118 138 143 399 466 548 67 1492020 Berry_Creek_MS 112 120 141 373 466 548 93 1752021 Berry_Creek_MS 109 115 123 347 466 548 119 2012022 Berry_Creek_MS 108 111 117 336 466 548 130 2122023 Berry_Creek_MS 107 110 109 326 -14.21% 466 548 140 2222016 Eagle_Valley_MS 97 122 112 331 379 446 48 1152017 Eagle_Valley_MS 135 93 125 353 379 446 26 932018 Eagle_Valley_MS 141 135 100 376 379 446 3 702019 Eagle_Valley_MS 132 141 142 415 379 446 (36) 312020 Eagle_Valley_MS 135 133 149 417 379 446 (38) 292021 Eagle_Valley_MS 157 134 140 431 379 446 (52) 152022 Eagle_Valley_MS 163 157 143 463 379 446 (84) (17)2023 Eagle_Valley_MS 169 164 161 494 49.24% 379 446 (115) (48)2016 ECC_Acad_MS 38 38 40 1162017 ECC_Acad_MS 38 38 38 1142018 ECC_Acad_MS 39 38 38 1152019 ECC_Acad_MS 39 39 38 1162020 ECC_Acad_MS 39 39 38 1162021 ECC_Acad_MS 38 39 39 1162022 ECC_Acad_MS 37 38 39 1142023 ECC_Acad_MS 37 38 36 111 -4.31%2016 Gypsum_Creek_MS 127 131 136 394 464 546 70 1522017 Gypsum_Creek_MS 146 126 137 409 464 546 55 1372018 Gypsum_Creek_MS 150 147 134 431 464 546 33 1152019 Gypsum_Creek_MS 147 150 155 452 464 546 12 942020 Gypsum_Creek_MS 128 148 159 435 464 546 29 1112021 Gypsum_Creek_MS 139 130 158 427 464 546 37 1192022 Gypsum_Creek_MS 142 139 138 419 464 546 45 1272023 Gypsum_Creek_MS 145 144 144 433 9.90% 464 546 31 1132016 Homestake_Peak_MS 72 76 87 235 220 258 (15) 232017 Homestake_Peak_MS 83 75 82 240 220 258 (20) 182018 Homestake_Peak_MS 104 83 77 264 220 258 (44) (6)2019 Homestake_Peak_MS 99 103 84 286 220 258 (66) (28)2020 Homestake_Peak_MS 94 98 105 297 220 258 (77) (39)2021 Homestake_Peak_MS 71 93 99 263 220 258 (43) (5)2022 Homestake_Peak_MS 73 71 95 239 220 258 (19) 192023 Homestake_Peak_MS 75 73 91 239 1.70% 220 258 (19) 192016 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 24 29 74 370 4352017 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 24 32 77 370 4352018 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 25 32 78 370 4352019 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 25 32 78 370 4352020 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 21 25 32 78 370 4352021 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 20 24 33 77 370 4352022 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 20 24 32 76 370 4352023 Vail_Ski_Snow_MS 20 23 29 72 -2.70% 370 4352016 World_Academy_MS 2 2 4 82017 World_Academy_MS 4 2 5 112018 World_Academy_MS 2 4 5 112019 World_Academy_MS 2 2 7 112020 World_Academy_MS 2 2 5 92021 World_Academy_MS 3 2 5 102022 World_Academy_MS 3 3 5 112023 World_Academy_MS 3 3 6 12 50.00%2016 Adjusted Totals 474 514 550 15382017 Adjusted Totals 564 475 541 15802018 Adjusted Totals 592 571 506 16692019 Adjusted Totals 558 598 601 17572020 Adjusted Totals 531 565 629 17252021 Adjusted Totals 537 537 597 16712022 Adjusted Totals 546 543 569 16582023 Adjusted Totals 556 555 576 1687 9.69%

ECSD - 8-year Middle School Forecast - HIGH - 11/16/15




Func

tiona

l C

apac

ity

Stre

ssed

C

apac

ity

Seat

s Ava

ilabl

e Fu

nctio

nal

Seat

s Ava

ilabl

e St

ress

ed

2016 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 45 90 174 164 193 (10) 192017 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 89 172 164 193 (8) 212018 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232019 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232020 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232021 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232022 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 164 193 (6) 232023 Red_Canyon_HS 8 31 44 87 170 -2.3% 164 193 (6) 232016 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 24 22 108 370 4352017 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 23 111 370 4352018 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 26 114 370 4352019 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 25 113 370 4352020 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 26 114 370 4352021 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 25 113 370 4352022 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 25 113 370 4352023 Vail_Ski_&_Snowboard_HS 32 30 26 26 114 5.6% 370 4352016 Eagle_Valley_HS 253 242 243 183 921 968 1139 47 2182017 Eagle_Valley_HS 261 254 243 240 998 968 1139 -30 1412018 Eagle_Valley_HS 285 265 258 243 1051 968 1139 (83) 882019 Eagle_Valley_HS 264 289 269 258 1080 968 1139 (112) 592020 Eagle_Valley_HS 328 269 294 270 1161 968 1139 (193) (22)2021 Eagle_Valley_HS 337 333 275 296 1241 968 1139 (273) (102)2022 Eagle_Valley_HS 326 343 339 278 1286 968 1139 (318) (147)2023 Eagle_Valley_HS 315 332 349 342 1338 45.3% 968 1139 (370) (199)2016 World_Academy_HS 0 2 11 13 262017 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 16 262018 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232019 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232020 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232021 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232022 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 232023 World_Academy_HS 0 2 8 13 23 -11.5%2016 Battle_Mountain_HS 242 209 220 219 890 1169 1375 279 4852017 Battle_Mountain_HS 261 240 199 239 939 1169 1375 230 4362018 Battle_Mountain_HS 230 259 229 217 935 1169 1375 234 4402019 Battle_Mountain_HS 213 227 248 247 935 1169 1375 234 4402020 Battle_Mountain_HS 243 211 217 266 937 1169 1375 232 4382021 Battle_Mountain_HS 261 241 200 234 936 1169 1375 233 4392022 Battle_Mountain_HS 237 258 230 217 942 1169 1375 227 4332023 Battle_Mountain_HS 221 236 249 249 955 7.3% 1169 1375 214 4202016 Adjusted Totals 535 514 543 527 21192017 Adjusted Totals 562 557 520 607 22462018 Adjusted Totals 555 587 565 586 22932019 Adjusted Totals 517 579 595 630 23212020 Adjusted Totals 611 543 589 662 24052021 Adjusted Totals 638 637 553 655 24832022 Adjusted Totals 603 664 647 620 25342023 Adjusted Totals 576 631 676 717 2600 22.7%

ECSD - 8-year High School Forecast - HIGH - 11/16/15

Documents

EaglE County SChool DiStriCt 2016 FaCility MaStEr Plan