Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Welcome
Environmental Advisory Board
Meeting
Robins Air Force BaseFebruary 7, 2013
1
Welcome and Program Introduction
Dr. Linda SmythEAB Community Co-chair
2
Acronyms and Abbreviations
oF – degrees Farhenheit AFCEC – Air Force Civil Engineer Center bgs – below ground surface BIA – Base Industrial Area CCF – Corrosion Control Facility CIO – Chief Information Officer DPT – Direct Push Technology DoD – Department of Defense EMS – Energy Management System ESTCP – Environmental Security Technology Certification Program FDD – Fault Detection and Diagnosis GA EPD – Georgia Environmental Protection Division HVAC – Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning
3
Acronyms and Abbreviations
kWh – kilowatt hours LCD – Liquid Crystal Display NILM – Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring O&M – Operations and Maintenance PCB – Polychlorinated Biphenyl RCRA – Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RFI – RCRA Facility Investigation RSL – Regional Screening Level SERDP – Strategic Environmental Research and Development
Program sf – square feet SVOC – Semivolatile Organic Compound US EPA – United States Environmental Protection Agency VOC – Volatile Organic Compound
4
SS-C508(Building 169)
Update on Progress
Environmental Advisory Board
February 7, 2013
Dean Williamson, P.E.Technical Lead
CH2M HILL
5
Overview
Background Purpose and Objectives of Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) Facility Investigation (RFI) RFI Field Activities RFI Report Content/Format Preliminary Findings Path Forward
6
Background
7
Aircraft Parts Repair Facility in the Greater Base Industrial Area
Soil Contamination Discovered beneath Floor Slab in Two Rooms in 2009• Volatile organic compounds
(VOCs)• Semivolatile organic
compounds (SVOCs)• Metals
Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GA EPD) April 11, 2011 Letter Requested Limited RFI for Soil around Perimeter of Building 169
Excavation Plan for the Base Industrial Area (BIA) has been Updated to Include Building 169
Land Use Controls are in Place as Part of Interim Corrective Measures
8
Background
Building 169Building 169
Define Nature and Extent of Soil Contamination around Perimeter of Building 169
Complete Focused Human Health Risk Assessment and Ecological Exposure Assessment for Building 169 Perimeter Soil and Leaching to Groundwater• Identification of contaminants of potential concern
• Exposure assessment
• Toxicity assessment
• Risk characterization
• Uncertainty assessment
Determine Path Forward
Purpose and Objectives of RCRA RFI
9
Direct Push Technology (DPT) Used for Field Investigation• Early September 2012 – 20 soil
borings, approximately 15 to 20 feet deep
• Mid-October 2012 – Four additional borings near northwest corner of Building 169 to delineate contamination near SB02
DPT Track Rig
RFI Field Activities
10
RFI Field Activities
Collected up to Three Soil Samples per Boring• Unpaved areas sampled from 0 to 2 feet below ground surface (bgs)• One sample collected from 2-foot interval immediately above water
table• One sample collected from 2-foot interval exhibiting highest
headspace reading Collected a Total of 52 Samples from 24 Borings Analyzed samples for:
• VOCs• SVOCs• RCRA metals• Hexavalent chromium• Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)• Total organic carbon
11
RFI Field Activities
12
Perimeter Soil Boring Locations
RFI Report Content/Format
Background Information
Summary of Findings
Conceptual Site Model
Baseline Risk Assessment
Conclusions and Recommendations
13
Preliminary Findings
Detected Analytes were Screened against Three Criteria:• Adjusted residential Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) from
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) risk-based table (non-carcinogenic RSLs divided by 10)
• Soil screening levels from US EPA risk-based table (multiplied by a dilution attenuation factor of 20)
• Background concentrations (for inorganic compounds)
Six VOCs were Detected above Screening Criteria Eleven SVOCs (primarily polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons) were Detected above Screening Criteria Hexavalent Chromium was the Only Metal Detected
above Screening Criteria No PCBs were Detected 14
15
Preliminary Findings
Hexavalent Chromium
In all borings except SB23 and
SB24
VOCs
Only SB02
SVOCs
In all borings except SB06, SB12,
SB17, and SB20
Boring Locations with Detections above Screening Levels
Submit RFI Report to GA EPD (January 2013)
Goal to Obtain GA EPD Approval (March 2013)
Path Forward
16
QUESTIONS/COMMENTS?
17
A Tool to Meet Air Force Energy Reduction Goals –
Building 59 Energy Management System
Brian Adair, Ph.D.Senior Chemical Engineer
Geosyntec Consultants
February 7, 2013
Environmental Advisory Board
18
OVERVIEW
Project Background Building 59 Background Environmental Security Technology Certification Program
(ESTCP) Project Components Summary
19
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Department of Defense (DoD) is Largest Consumer of Energy within Federal Government
Air Force is Largest Consumer of Energy within DoD Air Force Annual Energy Expenditures – $9 Billion
• 84 percent for aviation fuel• 12 percent for facilities (primarily electricity and natural gas)• 4 percent for vehicle and
ground equipment
2020
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Air Force Energy Plan• Reduce demand through
conservation and efficiency• Increase supply through
renewable and alternative energy sources
• Create a culture change –make energy a consideration in all we do
Key Goal• Reduce facility energy
intensity by 3 percent per year based on 2003 baseline (30 percent by 2015)
21
DoD Research Programs• Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program
(SERDP)─ Environmental science and technology program─ Invests in basic and applied research and advanced development
• ESTCP ─ Demonstration and validation program ─ Promotes transfer of innovative technologies from proof of concept to
field or production use
22
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Geosyntec Awarded ESTCP Energy Project• Energy Management System (EMS) for Building 59
(Large Aircraft Corrosion Control Paint/Depaint Facility)• Base Champion:
─ Environmental and Ergonomics Office, WR-ALC/QPE• Collaboration:
─ Geosyntec Consultants─ University of North Carolina at Charlotte
• Three year demonstrationprogram
23
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Building 59
BUILDING 59 BACKGROUND
225,000 square foot (sf) Corrosion Control Facility (CCF)
Two 65,000 sf Hangar Bays for Paint and Depaint
Small-parts Bay Common Central Facility Systems Process Equipment Plant
EAB Members Received Tour of Building 59 in April 2008
Paint and Depaint Hangars Fully Encloses C-5s and Other Aircraft
24
BUILDING 59 BACKGROUND
Paint/Depaint in CCFs Requires Monitoring and Control of:• Lighting• Air flow• Temperature• Relative humidity• Concentrations of particulate matter and
VOCs
25
Significant Energy Demand to Maintain Strict Environmental Control Requirements• Energy usage correlates with climate conditions
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
Ave
rage
Dai
ly E
lect
ricity
Con
sum
ptio
n (k
Wh)
Build
ing
59
Ave
rage
Tem
pera
ture
War
ner
Robi
ns, G
eorg
ia (o F
)
TemperatureElectricity
kWh – kilowatt hoursoF – degrees Fahrenheit
BUILDING 59 BACKGROUND
26
First Facility in Air Force to have Air Recirculation System• 80 percent of air recycled • 20 percent new air
BUILDING 59 BACKGROUND
27
BUILDING 59 BACKGROUND
Integrated Control System for Building Systems• Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC)• Lights
28
BUILDING 59 BACKGROUND
Building 59 Energy Usage• Even with automated controls, Building 59 energy demand
represents almost 10 percent of Robins AFB energy usage
Gas + ElectricityAll of Robins AFB
$23.9M
Building 59 Gas
$250K
Building 59Electricity
$1.7M
Misc. (mainly compressors)$340K
Fans$820K
Gas*$250K
Pumps$100K
Chillers$100K
Lights$100K
Building 59 Energy Use by Equipment* Gas used in air heating, hot water, and steam generation
2011 Electricity and Gas Costs
29
Scope of ESTCP Project• Demonstration and validation of
comprehensive and integrated energy management system─ Optimize in place light and
HVAC control system ─ Integration of:
Climate data Paint/depaint schedule Building occupancy Process mode (e.g., active painting,
curing, no aircraft) Equipment efficiency sensors
─ Development of tools to communicateenergy savings opportunities
“Most energy efficiency in industry is achieved through changes in how energy is managed in a facility” – Paul Scheihing, Technology
Manager, Department of Energy, 2009
“Primary demand reduction opportunities [for Building 59]
are operational changes” – Engineering Energy Analysis,
402nd Maintenance Wing
ESTCP PROJECT COMPONENTS
30
OptiRTC Platform • Flexible platform developed by Geosyntec• Collect data
─ Sensors─ Mobile field-forms─ Web data─ Historical sources
• Post data in Web-based dashboards─ Data visualization─ Manipulating system controls─ Establishing system alerts
• Use data to make intelligent system control decisions in real time
Platform
ESTCP PROJECT COMPONENTS
31
Conceptual Schematic of Energy Management System for Building 59
ESTCP PROJECT COMPONENTS
32
Add Sensors to Diagnose Equipment and Identify Problems• Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring (NILM)
─ Algorithms applied to measured electrical current
• Fault Detection and Diagnosis (FDD) by analyzing transients, operating schedules, frequency spectra, etc.
Forecast Problems and Plan Ahead
0 5 10 15 20 25 300.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
Time (sec)Po
wer
(kW
)
CloggedFilter
CleanFilter
Clogged (left) and Unclogged (right) Filters
ESTCP PROJECT COMPONENTS
33Signal from NILM
Time (seconds)Po
wer
(Kilo
wat
ts)
ESTCP PROJECT COMPONENTS
Additional Inputs• Painting, maintenance, and
personnel schedules• Utility usage data• Equipment status• Climate data• Building occupancy
sensors
34
Additional Outputs (via text messages, emails, displays, flashing lights)• VOC concentrations• Hazardous conditions• Sensor failures• Equipment not
functioning• Utility usage reports
Example Timeline for Painting Aircraft
35
ESTCP PROJECT COMPONENTS
LC D – Liquid Crystal Display
“The DoD Chief Information Officer (CIO) is committed to accelerating the adoption of cloud computing within the Department and to providing a secure, resilient enterprise Cloud Environment through an alignment with Department‐wide IT efficiency initiatives, federal data center consolidation and cloud computing efforts.”
“Cloud Computing Strategy”, DoD CIO, July 2012
ESTCP PROJECT COMPONENTS
36
Cloud Computing
Applications
Security & Integration
Databases
Server
Virtualization
Server Hardware
Storage
Networking
Runtimes
37
Applications
Security & Integration
Databases
Server
Virtualization
Server Hardware
Storage
Networking
Runtimes
Applications
Security & Integration
Databases
Server
Virtualization
Server Hardware
Storage
Networking
Runtimes
Private(On-Premise)
Infrastructure(as a Service)
Platform(as a Service)
You
Man
age Yo
u M
anag
e
You
Man
age
Managed by V
endor
Managed by V
endorESTCP PROJECT COMPONENTS
38
ESTCP PROJECT COMPONENTS
Applications
Security & Integration
Databases
Server
Virtualization
Server Hardware
Storage
Networking
Runtimes
Applications
Security & Integration
Databases
Server
Virtualization
Server Hardware
Storage
Networking
Runtimes
Platform(as a Service)
Private(DoD) Cloud Facility
You
Man
age
You
Man
age
ESTCP Project
Potential DoD Deployment
Strategyon
Appliance
on
Other CCFs• B-52 Bomber – Corrosion Control Hangar at Tinker AFB• C-17 – Corrosion Control Hangar at Charleston AFB • C-130 – Corrosion Control Hangar at Hill AFB
Small Paint Shops and Workshops throughout DoD• Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort• Marine Expeditionary Force’s Corrosion Repair Facility at
Camp Pendleton• Mobile Facility at Marine Corps Air Station Yuma
ESTCP PROJECT COMPONENTS
39
Savings from Better Control of Building Mode • Depaint Hangar Estimated at $150K per Year• Paint Hangar Estimated at $300K per Year
Expect to Realize Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Savings as Equipment Faults and Other Inefficiencies are Identified and Addressed
Simple Payback is Estimated at 3.9 Years
SUMMARY
40
Task
2013 2014 2015
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Project KickoffEstablish Building 59 Energy Consumption Baselines
Project Design
System Installation and Startup
System Operation
Reporting
Issue Guidance DocumentsQ1 = Feb-Mar-Apr; Q2 = May-Jun-Jul; Q3 = Aug-Sep-Oct; Q4 = Nov-Dec-Jan
SUMMARY
Preliminary Project Schedule with Key Milestones*
*Assumes Project Award by March 2013 41
QUESTIONS / COMMENTS
Contact Information:
Brian AdairSenior Chemical Engineer
[email protected](980) 333-2954
42
New Businessand
Program Closing
Dr. Linda SmythEAB Community Co-chair
43
Next EAB Meeting
Thursday, 2 May 2013
44
Please…Complete the meeting evaluation and feedback form and leave at your seat
Leave your name tag at the sign-in table for the next meeting
Thank you!45