32
E3T E3T Energy Efficiency Emerging Technologies Mogul Base LED Lamps for Retrofits E3T Emerging Technologies Showcase Leora Radetsky Lighting Research Center Levin Nock Aerotek Contractor for BPA Energy Efficiency September 24, 2015 Sponsored by BPA’s E3T Program 1

E3T E fficiency Emerging echnologies Mogul Base LED Lamps

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Mogul Base LED Lampsfor Retrofits

E3T Emerging Technologies Showcase

Leora RadetskyLighting Research Center

Levin NockAerotek Contractor for BPA Energy Efficiency

September 24, 2015

Sponsored by BPA’s E3T Program

1

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

2

GoToWebinar Logistics

• Minimize or maximize controlpanel

• Phone lines are muted

• Please use question pane to askquestions at any time, or if youhave any technical issues

NOTE: Today’s presentation is beingrecorded and will be available at

http://e3tnw.org/Webinars

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Mogul Base LED Lampsfor Retrofits

E3T Emerging Technologies Showcase

Leora RadetskyLighting Research Center

Levin NockAerotek Contractor for BPA Energy Efficiency

September 24, 2015

Sponsored by BPA’s E3T Program

3

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

4

BPA markets wholesale electric power andtransmission services in the PacificNorthwest, mostly to public utilities.

HQ in Portland, Oregon

3,100 employees

Founded 1937

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging TechnologiesE3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Average Wattage of HID Lamps in the USA

Most HID Mogul Base Lamps > 175W

5

(Adapted from U.S. Department of Energy/Navigant Consulting, 2012. “2010 U.S. Lighting Market Characterization”.)

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging TechnologiesE3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

• HID lamps: 26% of lighting energy; 2% of installed units• LED replacements: strategic energy savings

HID Lamps use 26% of Lighting Energy

6

Estimated US Energy Use (2010) by Lamp Type and Sector.(Adapted from U.S. Department of Energy/Navigant Consulting, 2012. “2010 U.S. Lighting Market Characterization”.)

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

DesignLights Consortium (DLC)

• Lamps• Screw-in power• NOT listed (yet?)

• Retrofit Kits• Hard-wired power• Listed

7

http://www.acuitybrandslighting.com/library/ll/documents/otherdocuments/kad-led%20luminaire%20&%20retrofit%20door%20brochure.pdf

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

DesignLights Consortium

Are mogul lamps the next TLEDs?(4-foot Tubular LED)

• Popular with end users, market growing• Broad range of quality• Questions about safety• When DLC sets a high bar, new products improve

8

DLC technical requirements are applicable to “new” products (not existing installations)

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

NVLAP-accreditedtesting laboratory

9

30,000 sq. ft. nearRensselaer campus

Research & educationrevenue = $6 M/year

40-60 concurrentprojects in field & lab

Advancing the effective use of light,thereby creating a positive legacyfor society and the environment.

34 full-time faculty & staff,15 graduate students

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Timeline

2014 2015Market ResearchProducts PurchasedLab TestsTest ReportsPresentations

10

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging TechnologiesE3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Lamp Bases:1.5” Mogul is larger than 1” Medium

11

1.0 inches

Medium

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

• Purchased Spring and Summer 2014• Specifier survey March 2014

– 191 non-manufacturer respondents– 30% had experience with mogul base

LED lamps• Applied DLC version 2.1 criteria for

retrofit kits to lamp testing– Hard-wired retrofit kit criteria used;

no lamp spec at that time– Retrofit kit method requires that light

sources (e.g. kits) are tested in a pre-approved, “typical” luminaire

12

DLC v 2.1 Retrofit Kit Criteria(Requirements differ by luminaire type)

Min. Light Output 270 – 9000 lm

Min. Efficacy 58-78

Min. CRI 63-68

Max. CCT 6022

Min. Power Factor 0.873

Max. THDi 21

Methods

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Survey Results

13

Types of mogul base LED lamps evaluated or specified by respondents

Wallpack/Roadway/Area

“Cylinder” post top(decorative streetlight)

High bay / canopy

PAR

Parking garage

Yard light(n = 42)

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Methods• 35 mogul base lamps in luminaires

were tested• Six test luminaires (according to DLC

retrofit criteria)• Decorative streetlight• Area light• Cobra head• High bay• Wall pack• *Yard light

(not a covered DLC category,sponsor interest)

14

Caveat: Some products may be obsolete

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Measured Luminaire Light Output

15

% meeting DLC Version 2.1 criterion: 91%

Legend: Light green area pass; white area fail

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging TechnologiesE3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Photometric Results: CRI(Color Rendering Index)

16

% meeting DLC Version 2.1 criterion: 94%

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging TechnologiesE3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Photometric Results: CCT(Correlated Color Temperature)

17

% meeting DLC Version 2.1 criterion: 86%

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Electrical Results: Power Factor

18

% meeting DLC Version 2.1 criterion: 83%

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging TechnologiesE3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Electrical Results: THDi(Total Harmonic Distortion in current)

19

% meeting DLC Version 2.1 criterion: 83%

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

20

% meeting DLC Version 2.1 criterion: 51%

wikimedia

Luminaire Efficacy

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Results: Thermal Protection

Four lamps demonstratedreduced power and lightoutput after being operatedfor some period of time

Measured results are for lowerpower/light operation

21

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Lamps meet DLC Retrofit Kit Spec?• 35 lamp-luminaire combos, 13 would pass DLC v2.1 (37%)

• 15 failed luminaire efficacy• 3 were unstable (power and/or light output fluctuates too

much to be accurately measured)• 3 failed CCT• 3 yard lights no category, might pass as ‘exterior, other’• No wall pack products passed

• What would pass, if socket power was acceptable• 3 area light (shoebox) and 4 cobra head

– Three lamps were cylindrical, other four lamps were half-cylindrical

• 2 acorn, 1 high bay

22

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

• Good news for persistent energy savings: HID lamps don’t work in convertedsockets.

• 18 MH lamps tested in converted sockets (277 V, bypassed ballast)• 9 non-protected lamps, 9 protected lamps (175W, 250W, 400W)

– Protected lamps have an additional envelope around the arc tube

• 15 lamps failed gracefully, including all protected lamps• 2 (non-protected) lamps shattered• 1 lamp survived

• Preliminary tests suggest installing a “fast-acting” replaceable fuse in eachbypassed luminaire to lower pulse energy by over 90% and prevent non-passive failures in case of snap-back

23

ReplacementSafety

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Application Efficacy Calculations• Is mogul base LED performance equivalent to HID performance?• Luminaire efficacy does not predict application performance• Luminaire system application efficacy (LSAE) considers energy efficiency of

light delivered to the task plane (light distribution, mounting height,luminaire-task geometry) rather than only considering the lamp or luminaire

24

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

• Tested luminaire intensity distributionsused to simulate applicationperformance at different mountingheights and spacing

• LSAE calculations for: parking lot,streets, warehouse

• Conclusion: Several productspurchased in Spring/ Summer 2014,required closer spacing and/or lowermounting heights than incumbent HIDluminaires (not one-for-onereplacements)

25

Application Efficacy CalculationsPower: 100 WMounting height: 10 ftIlluminance: 1 fc

wasted light

Power: 100 WMounting height: 30 ftIlluminance: 0.1 fc

Power: 100 WMounting height: 30 ftIlluminance: 0.1 fc

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

• LSAE warehouse application– 4 high bay (HB) combinations– Typical aisle simulated in AGi32– Various mounting heights (25 – 40 ft.)

and spacings (10 – 40 ft.) used– IES maintained illuminance levels

and uniformity criteria

• Results– Max. luminaire spacing: 10 – 15 feet– Max. mounting height (MH): 35 feet– LSAE: < 18 lm/W

• Layout had to meet light level and uniformity criteria– Much closer spacing required than typically used

26

Warehouse lighting criteria Avg. Illum.(lux)

Avg:Minratio

Hor. Illum floor 100 5:1

Vert. Illum. racks 50 5:1

wastedLight

(light levelstoo high)

Application Efficacy Calculations

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

• LSAE parking lot application– 4 yard light (YL) combinations– Various mounting heights (MH)

(5-45 ft.) were considered– IES RP-20-98 criteria

• Results– Max. luminaire spacing:

60 x 60 ft. (at 25 ft. MH)– Max. mounting height:

45 ft. (with 50 x 48 ft. pole spacing)– LSAE: up to 33 lm/W (at 10 ft. MH)– Much smaller coverage area than incumbent HPS area lights

• e.g. 150W HPS at 30 ft. MH meets RP-20 criteria with 140 x 110 ft. pole spacing(LSAE = 7 lm/W)

27

RP-20-98Parking lot criteria

Min. Illum.(lux)

Max:Minratio

2 20:1

Yard Light Luminaire and Lamp #5

Application Efficacy Calculations

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

• LSAE roadway application– 5 decorative acorn (AC) combinations– Various mounting heights (MH)

(15-45 ft.) were considered– IES RP-08-00 roadway

lighting criteria for collector roads• Results

– Max. pole spacing: 60 ft.(at 15 ft. MH)

– Max. mounting height: 45 ft.(with 40 ft. pole spacing)

– LSAE: up to 22 lm/W (at 30 ft. MH)– Much shorter pole spacing than those typically used

(50 – 200 ft., 125 ft. on average)

28

RP-08-00Roadwaylightingcriteria

Avg.Illum.(lux)

Avg:MinIllum.ratio

Veilingluminance

ratio

9 4:1 0.4

Decorative Acorn Luminaire and Lamp #3

Application Efficacy Calculations

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging TechnologiesE3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Recent DLC ProposedMogul Base LED Lamp Spec

29

• Select one of two proposed qualification paths:1. Omnidirectional, light output is similar in all directions2. Directional lamps have luminaire criteria (similar to

retrofit kit criteria, using pre-approved luminaires)• Same requirements as luminaires of the same type (Version

3.0 technical criteria)• Lamps tested in this project are directional• 35 lamp-luminaire combos, 13 would also pass DLC v3.0

Standard (37%)

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging TechnologiesE3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Conclusion:A DLC specification could help

30

• Most lamps met DLC version 2.1 criteria except for luminaire efficacy– Same results for DLC version 3.0 Standard Performance criteria

• Efficacy and application efficacy: mixed results• Many products were not equivalent to incumbent products in

terms of application performance

• Long term reliability not tested (beyond noticing that some lampsreduce power & light output to 50% when overheated)

• Reports: www.bpa.gov/goto/e3t Current Research SSL Testing

http://www.bpa.gov/EE/Technology/EE-emerging-technologies/Projects-Reports-Archives/Pages/SSL-Testing.aspx

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

31

Questions?

Leora RadetskyResearch ScientistLighting Research CenterRensselaer Polytechnic [email protected]

Levin NockResearch Project ManagerAerotek Contractor for BPA Energy [email protected]

E3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging TechnologiesE3TE3T EnergyEfficiencyEmerging Technologies

Upcoming Showcase Webinars

32

October 22 – Easily Commissioned Lighting Controls

Information and registration at www.e3tnw.org/webinars

Join our email list for notification at [email protected]

More information about emerging technologies:E3T database: www.e3tnw.orgE3T Program: www.bpa.gov/energy/n/emerging_technology/Conduit: www.ConduitNW.org

Thank you for attending our E3T Showcase Webinar!