Upload
rogan-cardenas
View
28
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
E-Infrastructures and Data Management Collaborative Research Action. Phase 1. Agenda. Objectives and Broader I mpacts E-Infrastructures and Data Management CRA Overview Assembly and Role of the Work Packages Deliverables. E-infrastructures and Data Management. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
E-INFRASTRUCTURES AND DATA MANAGEMENT
Collaborative Research Action
Phase 1
AGENDA
1.Objectives and Broader Impacts
2.E-Infrastructures and Data Management CRA Overview
3.Assembly and Role of the Work Packages
4.Deliverables
E-INFRASTRUCTURES AND DATA MANAGEMENT
“….the need to address global environmental challenges requires a more coordinated approach to the planning, implementation, and management of data, analytics and E-Infrastructures” through international collaboration.
- Belmont Forum, New Delhi, February 2013
KEY OBJECTIVES: COORDINATION AND COLLABORATION
Create a ‘space’ (Knowledge Hub) foster integrated communities that are better able to collaborate on e-infrastructure challenges
Build on international teams and partnerships that can effectively work with civil society to co-design e-infrastructures, data management and data-analytical challenges
OBJECTIVES AND BROADER IMPACTS
KEY OBJECTIVES:COMMUNITY STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION PLANIdentify strategic science policies, outlining what
can be done better, in a multilateral way, to support global change researchVision that clearly expresses global e-infrastructure needs,
barriers and gaps Informs stakeholders Prioritizes action to address the interoperability challenges Integrates existing national and international research in
order to promote more holistic environmental support systems
OBJECTIVES AND BROADER IMPACTS
COMMUNITY STRATEGY & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Recommendations could consist of one or more funding calls (CRAs) and/or policies/procedural changes: Actions that produce quick wins leading to recognizable results
Strategic leverage points to make a big difference with small sums of money or policy changes
Analysis of funding mechanisms that best sustain e-infrastructures
Strategic community-building initiatives around data infrastructuresProcess to engage the BF in the co-design of future CRAs to keep
pace with changing global e-infrastructure landscape
OBJECTIVES AND BROADER IMPACTS
BROADER IMPACTS
Recommendations from this project could change how the BF operates by promoting a more coordinated approach, in terms of policies, procedures and funding mechanisms, to support e-infrastructures in a more sustainable way OBJECTIVES AND BROADER IMPACTS
BROADER IMPACTS (CONTINUED)
If successful, this project will help the BF achieve collective impact, by identifying: A shared agenda around which BF agencies can organize
to better support global e-infrastructure Mutually reinforcing activities to achieve the shared
agenda How the BF can strategically mobilize funding,
coordinate community-building/outreach, facilitate dialogue between partners, and guide overall strategic direction
OBJECTIVES AND BROADER IMPACTS
BROADER IMPACTS (CONTINUED)
Small changes in how the BF operates could lead to big impacts globally
Potential to leverage domestic programs of member agencies to have an even greater impact
OBJECTIVES AND BROADER IMPACTS
MULTI-PHASE COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH ACTION (CRA)Phase I:
September 2013 – April 2015 Series of collaborative
scoping activities instead of a competitive call for small grants
Focus on reducing the risk of fragmenting existing communities and excluding important players
Produce a Community Strategy and Implementation Plan
Phase II:
Starts in 2015/2016 Begin delivering on
Implementation Plan based on input from the Knowledge Hub activities
Depends on outcomes of Phase I and funding agency participation
May include a funding call to implement the strategies and vision from Phase I
E-INFRASTRUCTURES AND DATA MANAGEMENT CRA OVERVIEW
1. Australia2. Brazil3. European
Commission4. France5. Germany6. Int’l Council
for Science
PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES
7. Italy
8. Japan
9. South Africa
10.UK
11.USA
12.GEO/GEOSS**Not a Belmont Forum Member; acting as a participant-observer in Phase 1 of this CRA.
PHASE I OVERVIEW
International Steering Committee 1 member per country or international organization
Members lead six Work Packages (WPs) / working groups
National delegations = Assembly ~ 10 members per country ~ 120 people
Project Secretariat – jointly funded by US (NSF) and UK (NERC)
Knowledge Hub Web platform (www.bfe-inf.org)
PHASE I TIMELINE
October 2013: Steering Committee Meeting in Windsor, UK, to define WPs and WP leadership
November 2013 – February 2014: Finalize WP workplans and populate WPs with Assembly members
August 1, 2014: WPs provide a report on preliminary findings to the Secretariat
Late August/early September 2014: Steering Committee meeting to synthesize WP findings into a cohesive interim report
September 15, 2014: Interim report due to the Belmont Forum
E-INFRASTRUCTURES AND DATA MANAGEMENT CRA OVERVIEW
PHASE I TIMELINE (CONTINUED)
October 8-10, 2014: Belmont Forum Plenary Meeting in Beijing, China to decide CRAs released in 2015
December 12-14, 2014: SC meeting in San Francisco, USA prior to AGU 2014
January 2015: Draft Community Strategy and Implementation Plan due to the Belmont Forum Principals
March/April 2015: Final Community Strategy and Implementation Plan due to the Belmont Forum Principals
E-INFRASTRUCTURES AND DATA MANAGEMENT CRA OVERVIEW
ASSEMBLY
120 + experts ~10 per country Divided into 6 Work Packages
(WPs)
end-user domain scientists computer and information
scientists legal experts social scientists
Architecture and Interoperability WP1: Data Integration for
Multidisciplinary Research WP2: Improved interface
between the computation and data infrastructures
WP3: Harmonization of global data infrastructure for sharing environmental data
Governance WP4: Data
Sharing WP5: Open Data WP6: Capacity
Building (cross-cutting)
WORK PACKAGES
ASSEMBLY AND ROLE OF THE WORK PACKAGES
WORK PACKAGES: INTER-RELATIONSHIPS
WP1: Data Integra-tion for Multidiscip-
linary Research
WP2: Interface between computation and data in-
frastructures
WP3: Harmonization of global data infrastruc-ture for sharing envi-
ronmental data
WP4: Data Shar-ing
WP5: Open Data
WP6: Capacity Building (Cross-Cutting)
ROLE OF THE ASSEMBLY MEMBERS AND WORK PACKAGES
Provide evidence to support recommendations on how the BF can best support e-infrastructure
Each individual: Brings a unique area of expertise, so all contributions are
critical and valuable
Should draw on her or his knowledge/expertise to identify existing capabilities, gaps and remaining research challenges in both technical and governance arenas
Already participates in a number of international and national initiatives, and so can take a holistic view
ASSEMBLY AND ROLE OF THE WORK PACKAGES
FOCUSING THE WORK PACKAGES Leverage existing resources/partnerships/investments/initiatives
DON’T reinvent the wheel There are already international programs that promote best practice in parts of
environmental science
WPs should decide which parts require additional funding, and where there are still gaps between existing programs
Each WP is asked to consider its area of focus, and, with the collective experience of the participants, consider: Which activities are addressed adequately and DO NOT require further
attention
Which activities are not addressed adequately and DO require further attention
For areas that require further support, consider how support is best provided
ASSEMBLY AND ROLE OF THE WORK PACKAGES
DELIVERABLES
Interim Report Due September 15, 2014
Community Strategy and Implementation Plan Draft due in January 2015
Final due in March/April 2015
Work Package Deliverables Due prior to interim report (August 1, 2014)
Due prior to draft and final versions of the PlanDELIVERABLES
INTERIM REPORT
The BF requires an interim report prior to their meeting in Beijing, China, October 8-10 in order to: Flag emerging issues and preliminary recommendations
that may include one or more funding calls (CRAs) Allow the BF enough time to release a CRA(s) in 2015, should
that be a preliminary recommendation Accommodate funding agencies’ annual budget deadlines,
which influence when CRAs are released Engage the BF in the co-design of any future CRA(s) to
prevent a long gap between submitting and acting upon recommendations
DELIVERABLES
WORK PACKAGES: DELIVERABLES
Initial WP deliverables are due by August 1, 2014:1. Review of the existing situation/lay of the land in each WP focus
area(s)
2. Identify the need to take action in a particular area: What are the issues that need to be addressed and why?
3. Identify whether a CRA could address this issue. If so, how?
4. Identify strategic policies or actions that BF could take to address this issue
Final deliverables for the Plan will consist of concrete evidence to support recommendations
DELIVERABLES
QUICK LINKS FOR MORE INFORMATION
www.belmontforum.orgwww.bfe-inf.orghttps://twitter.com/BFE_Inf
QUESTIONS?