Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Effective free dynamics of a tracer-particlecoupled to a Fermi gas in the high-density limit
David Mitrouskas
Department Mathematik der LMU München
joint work with Maximilian Jeblick, Sören Petrat and Peter Pickl
Basque Center for Applied Mathematics, September 29
motivation
Phys. Rev. Letters 32, 23 (1974)
1 E. Fermi and E. Teller, Phys. Rev. 72, 399 (1947)
2 M. Gryzinski, Phys. Rev. 111, 900 (1958)
table of contents
1 Microscopic Model
2 Main result and effective model
3 Sketch of the Proof
4 Explanation as a mean field type result
5 Conclusion
table of contents
1 Microscopic Model
2 Main result and effective model
3 Sketch of the Proof
4 Explanation as a mean field type result
5 Conclusion
microscopic model
• N+1 particle wave function on a d-dim. torus of length Λ
Ψ ∈ L2(Td(N+1), ddx1...ddxN ddy)
• non-relativistic Schrödinger equation
i∂tΨt = HNΨt ⇒ Ψt = e−iHN tΨ0
• microscopic Hamiltonian
HN = −∆y −N∑k=1
∆xk + g
N∑k=1
v(xk − y)
- v ∈ C∞0 (Td)- g = 1: not in the weak-coupling regime
microscopic model
• N+1 particle wave function on a d-dim. torus of length Λ
Ψ ∈ L2(Td(N+1), ddx1...ddxN ddy)
• non-relativistic Schrödinger equation
i∂tΨt = HNΨt ⇒ Ψt = e−iHN tΨ0
• microscopic Hamiltonian
HN = −∆y −N∑k=1
∆xk + g
N∑k=1
v(xk − y)
- v ∈ C∞0 (Td)- g = 1: not in the weak-coupling regime
microscopic model
• N+1 particle wave function on a d-dim. torus of length Λ
Ψ ∈ L2(Td(N+1), ddx1...ddxN ddy)
• non-relativistic Schrödinger equation
i∂tΨt = HNΨt ⇒ Ψt = e−iHN tΨ0
• microscopic Hamiltonian
HN = −∆y −N∑k=1
∆xk + g
N∑k=1
v(xk − y)
- v ∈ C∞0 (Td)- g = 1: not in the weak-coupling regime
microscopic model
• N+1 particle wave function on a d-dim. torus of length Λ
Ψ ∈ L2(Td(N+1), ddx1...ddxN ddy)
• non-relativistic Schrödinger equation
i∂tΨt = HNΨt ⇒ Ψt = e−iHN tΨ0
• microscopic Hamiltonian
HN = −∆y −N∑k=1
∆xk + g
N∑k=1
v(xk − y)
- v ∈ C∞0 (Td)- g = 1: not in the weak-coupling regime
microscopic model
• initial condition Ψ0 = φ0 ⊗ Ω0
- φ0 ∈ H2(Td, ddy),∣∣∣∣φ0∣∣∣∣L2(Td) = 1
- ground state of the ideal Fermi gas
Ω0(x1, ..., xN ) =1√N !
∑σ∈SN
(−1)σN∏i=1
ϕσ(i)(xi)
ϕk(x) = Λ− d
2 exp(ipkx), pk = 2πΛ−1zk with N smallest zk ∈ Zd
• Fermi momentum and average density : kF = Cdρ1d
table of contents
1 Microscopic Model
2 Main result and effective model
3 Sketch of the Proof
4 Explanation as a mean field type result
5 Conclusion
main result and effective model
• main result (similar for d = 1)
Let d = 2 and � > 0. Denote average dens. by ρ = N/Λ2.Then there exists a positive constant C� s.t. for all t > 0
limN,Λ→∞ρ=const.
∣∣∣∣e−iHN tΨ0 − e−iHmf tΨ0∣∣∣∣L2(Td(N+1)) ≤ C�t 32 ρ− 18 +�• effective Hamiltonian
Hmf = −∆y −N∑k=1
∆xk + ρv̂(0)
- V → E|Ω0|2 [V ](y) = 〈Ω0, V Ω0〉L2(TdN )(y) = ρv̂(0)
- physically equivalent to free dynamics
main result and effective model
• main result (similar for d = 1)
Let d = 2 and � > 0. Denote average dens. by ρ = N/Λ2.Then there exists a positive constant C� s.t. for all t > 0
limN,Λ→∞ρ=const.
∣∣∣∣e−iHN tΨ0 − e−iHmf tΨ0∣∣∣∣L2(Td(N+1)) ≤ C�t 32 ρ− 18 +�• effective Hamiltonian
Hmf = −∆y −N∑k=1
∆xk + ρv̂(0)
- V → E|Ω0|2 [V ](y) = 〈Ω0, V Ω0〉L2(TdN )(y) = ρv̂(0)
- physically equivalent to free dynamics
main result and effective model
• main result (similar for d = 1)
Let d = 2 and � > 0. Denote average dens. by ρ = N/Λ2.Then there exists a positive constant C� s.t. for all t > 0
limN,Λ→∞ρ=const.
∣∣∣∣e−iHN tΨ0 − e−iHmf tΨ0∣∣∣∣L2(Td(N+1)) ≤ C�t 32 ρ− 18 +�• effective Hamiltonian
Hmf = −∆y −N∑k=1
∆xk + ρv̂(0)
- V → E|Ω0|2 [V ](y) = 〈Ω0, V Ω0〉L2(TdN )(y) = ρv̂(0)
- physically equivalent to free dynamics
main result and effective model
• main result (similar for d = 1)
Let d = 2 and � > 0. Denote average dens. by ρ = N/Λ2.Then there exists a positive constant C� s.t. for all t > 0
limN,Λ→∞ρ=const.
∣∣∣∣e−iHN tΨ0 − e−iHmf tΨ0∣∣∣∣L2(Td(N+1)) ≤ C�t 32 ρ− 18 +�• effective Hamiltonian
Hmf = −∆y −N∑k=1
∆xk + ρv̂(0)
- V → E|Ω0|2 [V ](y) = 〈Ω0, V Ω0〉L2(TdN )(y) = ρv̂(0)
- physically equivalent to free dynamics
table of contents
1 Microscopic Model
2 Main result and effective model
3 Sketch of the Proof
4 Explanation as a mean field type result
5 Conclusion
sketch of the proof
• general strategy
- appropriate expansion of e−iHN tΨ0 around e−iHmf tΨ0
- control of fluctuations by means of oscillatory integrals
- proof relies highly on the anti-symmtry of Ω0
- explicit propagation estimates: rate of convergence
sketch of the proof
• repetitive application of Duhamel’s formula
e−iHN tΨ0 =e−iHmf tΨ0 − i
∫ t0
e−iHN (t−s)(V − ρv̂(0))e−iHmf sΨ0 ds
• ∣∣∣∣e−iHN tΨ0 − e−iHmf tΨ0∣∣∣∣ ≤√∣∣∣∣ΨA(t)∣∣∣∣+ ∣∣∣∣ΨB(t)∣∣∣∣- first order contribution
ΨA(t) =
∫ t0
eiHmf s(V − ρv̂(0))e−iHmf sΨ0 ds
- higher order contributions ΨB(t)
sketch of the proof
• repetitive application of Duhamel’s formula
e−iHN tΨ0 =e−iHmf tΨ0 − i
∫ t0
e−iHN (t−s)(V − ρv̂(0))e−iHmf sΨ0 ds
• ∣∣∣∣e−iHN tΨ0 − e−iHmf tΨ0∣∣∣∣ ≤√∣∣∣∣ΨA(t)∣∣∣∣+ ∣∣∣∣ΨB(t)∣∣∣∣- first order contribution
ΨA(t) =
∫ t0
eiHmf s(V − ρv̂(0))e−iHmf sΨ0 ds
- higher order contributions ΨB(t)
sketch of the proof
• controlling the norm of ΨA- too rough:
∣∣∣∣ΨA(t)∣∣∣∣2 ≤ t2Var[V ] = Ct2ρ 12- better:
∣∣∣∣ΨA(t)∣∣∣∣2 = N∑k=1
∞∑l=N+1
|v̂(pk − pl)|2
Λ2︸ ︷︷ ︸=Var[V ]
∣∣∣∣ ∫ t0
ei(Ek−El)shkl(s)φ0︸ ︷︷ ︸oscillating integrand
ds∣∣∣∣2
with hkl(s) = e−i∆sei(pk−pl)yei∆s
• fast decay of v̂ (Paley-Wiener ⇒ no large mom. transfer)• oscillation of ei(Ek−El)s for |pk| ≈ kF
(Ek − El) = p2k − p2l = (|pk|+ |pl|)(|pk| − |pl|) ≥ kF · �(kF )
sketch of the proof
• controlling the norm of ΨA- too rough:
∣∣∣∣ΨA(t)∣∣∣∣2 ≤ t2Var[V ] = Ct2ρ 12- better:
∣∣∣∣ΨA(t)∣∣∣∣2 = N∑k=1
∞∑l=N+1
|v̂(pk − pl)|2
Λ2︸ ︷︷ ︸=Var[V ]
∣∣∣∣ ∫ t0
ei(Ek−El)shkl(s)φ0︸ ︷︷ ︸oscillating integrand
ds∣∣∣∣2
with hkl(s) = e−i∆sei(pk−pl)yei∆s
• fast decay of v̂ (Paley-Wiener ⇒ no large mom. transfer)• oscillation of ei(Ek−El)s for |pk| ≈ kF
(Ek − El) = p2k − p2l = (|pk|+ |pl|)(|pk| − |pl|) ≥ kF · �(kF )
sketch of the proof
• controlling the norm of ΨA- too rough:
∣∣∣∣ΨA(t)∣∣∣∣2 ≤ t2Var[V ] = Ct2ρ 12- better:
∣∣∣∣ΨA(t)∣∣∣∣2 = N∑k=1
∞∑l=N+1
|v̂(pk − pl)|2
Λ2︸ ︷︷ ︸=Var[V ]
∣∣∣∣ ∫ t0
ei(Ek−El)shkl(s)φ0︸ ︷︷ ︸oscillating integrand
ds∣∣∣∣2
with hkl(s) = e−i∆sei(pk−pl)yei∆s
• fast decay of v̂ (Paley-Wiener ⇒ no large mom. transfer)• oscillation of ei(Ek−El)s for |pk| ≈ kF
(Ek − El) = p2k − p2l = (|pk|+ |pl|)(|pk| − |pl|) ≥ kF · �(kF )
sketch of the proof
• denote v̂a(pk − pl) = θ(ρa − 2πΛ−1|pk − pl|)v̂(pk − pl)
∣∣∣∣ΨA∣∣∣∣2 ≈ Ct2 [ N∑k=1
∞∑l=N+1
+
{stationary points}
1
k2F · �(kF )2N∑k=1
∞∑l=N+1
]|v̂a(pk − pl)|2
Λ2
• sufficient control
limN,Λ→∞ρ=const.
∣∣∣∣ΨA(t)∣∣∣∣2 ≤ t2(Cρ− 14 + 3a2 + Caρ− 1a)
sketch of the proof
• denote v̂a(pk − pl) = θ(ρa − 2πΛ−1|pk − pl|)v̂(pk − pl),
∣∣∣∣ΨA∣∣∣∣2 ≈ Ct2 [ N∑k=1
∞∑l=N+1
+
{stationary points}
1
k2F · �(kF )2N∑k=1
∞∑l=N+1
]|v̂a(pk − pl)|2
Λ2
• sufficient control
limN,Λ→∞ρ=const.
∣∣∣∣ΨA(t)∣∣∣∣2 ≤ t2(Cρ− 14 + 3a2 + Caρ− 1a)
sketch of the proof
• denote v̂a(pk − pl) = θ(ρa − 2πΛ−1|pk − pl|)v̂(pk − pl),
∣∣∣∣ΨA∣∣∣∣2 ≈ Ct2 [ N∑k=1
∞∑l=N+1
+
{stationary points}
1
k2F · �(kF )2N∑k=1
∞∑l=N+1
]|v̂a(pk − pl)|2
Λ2
• sufficient control
limN,Λ→∞ρ=const.
∣∣∣∣ΨA(t)∣∣∣∣2 ≤ t2(Cρ− 14 + 3a2 + Caρ− 1a)
sketch of the proof
ΨB =
∫ t0
∫ s10
eiHNs2(V -ρv̂(0))eiHmf (s1-s2)(V -ρv̂(0))e-iHmf s1Ψ0 ds2 ds1
• controlling the norm of ΨB- full time-evolution e−iHN t (need to reexpand)
- immediate recollisions require energy renormalization
Hmf = −∆y −N∑k=1
∆xk + ρv̂(0)− Ea(ρ)
with Ea(ρ)/ρ→ 0 for ρ→∞
• sufficient control at third order
limN,Λ→∞ρ=const.
∣∣∣∣ΨB(t)∣∣∣∣2 ≤ t3(Cρ− 14 + 7a4 + Caρ− 1a)
sketch of the proof
ΨB =
∫ t0
∫ s10
eiHNs2(V -ρv̂(0))eiHmf (s1-s2)(V -ρv̂(0))e-iHmf s1Ψ0 ds2 ds1
• controlling the norm of ΨB- full time-evolution e−iHN t (need to reexpand)
- immediate recollisions require energy renormalization
Hmf = −∆y −N∑k=1
∆xk + ρv̂(0)− Ea(ρ)
with Ea(ρ)/ρ→ 0 for ρ→∞
• sufficient control at third order
limN,Λ→∞ρ=const.
∣∣∣∣ΨB(t)∣∣∣∣2 ≤ t3(Cρ− 14 + 7a4 + Caρ− 1a)
table of contents
1 Microscopic Model
2 Main result and effective model
3 Sketch of the Proof
4 Explanation as a mean field type result
5 Conclusion
explanation as a mean field type result
• fluctuations of V around ρv̂(0) in d dimensions
Var[V ](y) = 〈Ω0, (V − ρv̂(0))2Ω0〉L2(TdN )(y) = Cdρd−1d
- P|Ω0|2(∣∣∑N
k=1 v(xk − y)− ρv̂(0)∣∣) ≈ 1 does not hold
- random forces in the gas are large (strong coupling g = 1)
• Comparison with bosons (symmetric initial Ω0)- fluctuations: VarB [V ] = Cdρ (due to
√N law)
- lifetime of φ0 decreases for increasing density ρ1
1 Emission of Cerenkov radiation as a mechanism for Hamiltonianfriction, J. Fröhlich and Z. Gang, Advances in Mathematics 264(2014) 183–235
explanation as a mean field type result
• fluctuations of V around ρv̂(0) in d dimensions
Var[V ](y) = 〈Ω0, (V − ρv̂(0))2Ω0〉L2(TdN )(y) = Cdρd−1d
- P|Ω0|2(∣∣∑N
k=1 v(xk − y)− ρv̂(0)∣∣) ≈ 1 does not hold
- random forces in the gas are large (strong coupling g = 1)
• Comparison with bosons (symmetric initial Ω0)- fluctuations: VarB [V ] = Cdρ (due to
√N law)
- lifetime of φ0 decreases for increasing density ρ1
1 Emission of Cerenkov radiation as a mechanism for Hamiltonianfriction, J. Fröhlich and Z. Gang, Advances in Mathematics 264(2014) 183–235
explanation as a mean field type result
• first glance: mean field theory seems not to apply
• closer look at fluctuations:
- (V − ρv̂(0))Ψ0 = Λ−1∑Nk=1 V (pk)Ψ0 with
V (pk)Ψ0 =
∞∑l=N+1
v̂(pk − pl)Λ
ei(pk−pl)ya∗(pk)a(pl)Ψ0
- {V (pk)}Nk=1 family of uncorrelated random variables
Var[V ] = Λ−2N∑k=1
Var[V (pk)]
explanation as a mean field type result
explanation as a mean field type result
explanation as a mean field type result
table of contents
1 Microscopic Model
2 Main result and effective model
3 Sketch of the Proof
4 Explanation as a mean field type result
5 Conclusion
conclusion
• long lived resonance of φ0 emerges under e−iHN t (ρ→∞)- previously known in the physics literature (ion stopping)
• open question for 3d model- applied method does not yield sufficient estimates
• fermions: mean field regime � weak-coupling regime- compared to bosons: mean field regime = weak-coupling regime
• further research- thermal initial states, ground states in periodic external potential,
long time behaviour of φ0, similar result in the fully interacting case
conclusion
• long lived resonance of φ0 emerges under e−iHN t (ρ→∞)- previously known in the physics literature (ion stopping)
• open question for 3d model- applied method does not yield sufficient estimates
• fermions: mean field regime � weak-coupling regime- compared to bosons: mean field regime = weak-coupling regime
• further research- thermal initial states, ground states in periodic external potential,
long time behaviour of φ0, similar result in the fully interacting case
conclusion
• long lived resonance of φ0 emerges under e−iHN t (ρ→∞)- previously known in the physics literature (ion stopping)
• open question for 3d model- applied method does not yield sufficient estimates
• fermions: mean field regime � weak-coupling regime- compared to bosons: mean field regime = weak-coupling regime
• further research- thermal initial states, ground states in periodic external potential,
long time behaviour of φ0, similar result in the fully interacting case
conclusion
• long lived resonance of φ0 emerges under e−iHN t (ρ→∞)- previously known in the physics literature (ion stopping)
• open question for 3d model- applied method does not yield sufficient estimates
• fermions: mean field regime � weak-coupling regime- compared to bosons: mean field regime = weak-coupling regime
• further research- thermal initial states, ground states in periodic external potential,
long time behaviour of φ0, similar result in the fully interacting case
Thank you for your attention
Microscopic ModelMain result and effective modelSketch of the ProofExplanation as a mean field type resultConclusion