Upload
others
View
13
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
1
6. Remedial measures
1
Dynamics of structures
Arnaud Deraemaeker ([email protected])
2
A test-case based learning of vibrations in civil engineering
Case study 1 : pedestrian induced vibrations of a footbridge
• Source of excitation• Effects• Design methodology• Remedial measures
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
2
3
Typical frequencies of footbridges
Vibration problems in structures, H. Bachman, 1995
4
Design methodology : High vs low tuning
Low tuning High tuning
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
3
5Vibration problems in structures, H. Bachman, 1995
Design methodology : Influence of stiffness
6
Stiffening leads to lower vibration for the same value of damping
Design methodology : Influence of stiffness
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
4
7
Design methodology : Influence of damping
8
Design methodology : Influence of damping
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
5
9
Remedial measures
Vibration problems in structures, H. Bachman, 1995
What can you do if levels of vibrations are excessive ?
Remedial measure 1 : Increased damping
10
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
6
11
Damping
12
Types and origin of damping
Damping = dissipation of energy
Vibration problems in structures, H. Bachman, 1995
Local damping models
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
7
13
Material damping
Viscous damping
Loss factor – Hysteretic damping
Local damping models
Loss factor can be different for each material and frequency dependent (frequency domain computations)
In each material(time domain computations)
Those damping coefficients can be identified experimentally on small material samples
14
Typical values of damping
Contributions to damping
Damping coefficients are usually derived from practice or measured if the structure is built
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
8
15
Measurement of damping
Logarithmic decrement method Half-power bandwidth
Estimation of in the time domain Estimation of in the frequency domain
16
Logarithmic decrement method
Free response
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
9
17
Half-power bandwidth
Remedial measure 2 :The tuned mass damper (TMD)
18
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
10
Application example : the tuned mass damper
Equations of motion:
20
Application example : the tuned mass damper
Undamped vibration absorber (b=0)
for
Harmonic excitation:
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
11
21
Undamped tuned mass damper
The damping device is tuned to the eigenfrequency of the primary system-> Reduces vibrations in a narrow band around eigenfrequency-> Amplification outside of this narrow band
If you choose you can cancel the vibration of the primary system at its natural frequency
22
Pendulum tuned mass damper
Inertial coupling of the two systems
small
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
12
23
Pendulum tuned mass damper
Harmonic excitation:
for
24
Pendulum tuned mass damper
•Tuning of the PTMD based on the length of the pendulum
•Effect of the mass mainly on the spreading of the peaks
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
13
25
Damped tuned mass damper
-Reduction of vibration is lower around eigenfrequency with b increasing-Reduces the amplification outside of the narrow frequency band-Existence of P and Q : points where all curves cross
26
Optimal design of tuned mass dampers
Optimum damping is given by
P and Q are at equal height for
[ Den Hartog, 1954]
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
14
27
Steps to follow to design a TMD
- The maximum mass of the device is decided fixing
- Based on this value, the frequency of the TMD is tuned :
- Which allows to compute the stiffnes of the TMD
- And finally the optimal damping is computed
28[ Warburton 1982 ]
Optimal tuning rules for base excitation
Goal : minimize
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
15
29
Damped pendulum tuned mass damper
Analogy with TMD[ Deraemaeker 2018]
30
Application of TMDs to continous systems modeled with the finite element method
Reduce main system to a one dof system using as reference point the point of attachment of the TMD (in the direction of its motion)
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
16
31
Single mode approximation
Point load at the position of the TMD
Application of TMDs to continous systems modeled with the finite element method
32
Reduction of a finite element model to a one dof system
• Apply tuning rules using equivalent mass and stiffness
• Does not work for base excitation !
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
17
33
Tuned mass damper attached to continuous systems
Ground motion (acceleration)
Example : predicting the response of a 10 storey building to earthquake
Without TMD With TMD tuned to first mode
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
18
35
Undamped tuned mass damper
The building is excited at its natural frequency (2.62 Hz)
36
Tuned mass damper in action
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
19
37
TMDs applied to pedestrian bridges
Case study 1 : pedestrian induced vibrations of a footbridge
• Source of excitation• Effects• Design methodology• Remedial measures
38
Example of tuned mass dampers in structures
Millenium bridge, London
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
20
39
Tuned mass damper in action on a bridge
40
Tuned mass damper in action on a bridge
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
21
41
TMDs applied to high-rise buildings
Case study 2 : Vibrations of high-rise buildings
• Source of excitation• Effects• Design methodology• Remedial measures
42
John Hancock Tower (Boston-1976)
Two TMDs of 2700 kN (approx 5.2x5.2x1m steel blocks)
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
22
43
City Corp Center (New York - 1977)
Tuned mass damper
-400 Tons block installed at the top(2% of effective mass of first mode)
- 279m high- Fundamental period = 6.5s
44
City Corp Center (New York - 1977)
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
23
45
Chiba Port Tower (Japan - 1986)
Tuned mass damper : 15 tonsCan slide in two directions
46
Damped pendulum tuned mass damper
Dampers
Tai Pei (Taiwan)
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
24
47
Pendulum tuned mass damper example – Taipei 101
48
Pendulum tuned mass damper example – Taipei 101
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
25
49
Pendulum tuned mass damper example
Pendulum motion during earthquake, May 12, 2008
50
A test-case based learning of vibrations in civil engineering
Case study 3 : Machinery induced vibrations in a building
• Source of excitation• Effects• Design methodology• Remedial measures
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
26
Remedial measure 4 :Direct vibration isolation
51
52
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
27
53
Vibration transmission
Vibration isolation
Isolation factor:
54
Force transmitted to the ground:
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
28
Vibration isolation
55
Vibration isolation : isolation domain
•Choose k such that the isolation domain corresponds to the frequency content of the excitation signal f(t)•This results usually in the use of soft springs
56
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
29
Vibration isolation : influence of damping
High damping- Low amplification around resonance - Reduced isolation
Ideal solution : frequency dependent damping (high at low frequencies, low at high frequencies)Example: rubber, elastomers …
57
Low damping- High amplification around resonance - Good isolation at high frequencies
Vibration isolation : examples
58
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
30
59
60
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
31
61
A test-case based learning of vibrations in civil engineering
Case study 4 : Vibrations caused by traffic
• Source of excitation• Effects• Design methodology• Remedial measures
62
Vibration damping in railway tracks
Vibration problems in structures, H. Bachman, 1995
Addition of damping
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
32
63
Vibration isolation of railway tracks
Vibration isolation systems
64
Remedial measures for earthquakes
Case study 2 : Vibrations of high-rise buildings
• Source of excitation• Effects• Design methodology
• Low/high tuning• Damping
• Remedial measures :• TMDs• Inverse vibration
isolation
Ground motion (acceleration)
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
33
Remedial measure 5 :Inverse vibration isolation
65
Inverse vibration isolation
The transmissibility is equal to the isolation factor previously definedThe aim is to ‘decouple’ the motion of the building from the ground motion
66
Transmissibility :
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
34
To isolate in the low frequency domain, we need k small, m high
67
Inverse vibration isolation
68
Inverse vibration isolation : examples
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
35
69
Inverse vibration isolation : examples
70
Inverse vibration isolation : precision microscope
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
36
71
Inverse vibration isolation : domonstrators
72
Inverse vibration isolation : real-life examples
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
37
73
Inverse vibration isolation : real-life examples
74
Inverse vibration isolation : real-life examples
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
38
75
76
Vibration isolation versus damping
Ground motion (acceleration)
Isolation or damping ?
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
39
77
Vibration damping of 5 storey building under ground excitation
Initial damping Added damping
78
Vibration isolation of 5 storey building under ground excitation
• Building considered as a rigid body• Cut-off frequency to compute kt
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
40
79
Vibration isolation of 5 storey building under ground excitation
Cut-off frequency of 4 Hz
80
Vibration isolation of 5 storey building under ground excitation
f=4Hz
f=1Hz
Dynamics of Structures 2019-2020 6. Remedial measures
41
81
Vibration isolation of 5 storey building under ground excitation
• Isolation and damping are very different mechanisms• Above cut-off frequency, if well designed, isolation is generally
more efficient (but might be more expensive) than damping.