Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Mr. Udo van Deventer
Dry hopping larger volumes: Challenges & Technical Solutions
Asia Pacific Convention 2018 | Wellington, New Zealand Institute of Brewing and Distilling Asia Pacific Section1
2
A bit of history
Hops are a new thing
Aroma varieties are BOOMING
Worldwide more hops have gone
into the ground, rising by around
3,000 ha to around 59,200 ha.
US Aroma & Flavour varieties
have Quadrupled in 5 Years,
despite beer volumes
contracting.
Source: Hop Growers of America 2016 Statistical Report
3
Why larger volumes are a problem
4
Why larger volumes are
a problem
Long settling times
Difficult to crop
Inconsistent mixing/extraction
Blocked Heat Exchangers
Blocked Pipes
Blocked valves
Overloaded Centrifuges
Filtration binding
5
Hop ‘Clouds’
or
Hop ‘Shoulders’ Maturation tanks cropped to remove solids and show ‘clean’ beer
During Filtration ‘hop bergs’ or ‘hop clouds’
appear and cause blockage or bind filter.
During Filtration Towards End ‘Slug’
6
Factors
Solubility of Hops
Brewery Design
Dynamic
vs
Static
Volume
7
Getting flavor from hop pellets Hops are not soluble
10:1 = thick slurry
Lupulin Glands contain essential oils and resins
Polar & Non-Polar components = Flavour
Temperature → faster swelling vs reduced aroma
20-30 mins
8
Static Dry hopping
Advantages:
Simple
Replicates pilot plant methods
Cons: Small exchange surface to volume
Diffusion into beer can result in stratification
Solids collect in cone & possibly form ‘clouds’
Time decided mainly by settling & Compaction
Flavour lost in cropping
Extract Loss with hops
9
Dynamic Dry hopping
Advantages:
All beer is in contact with hop material
Even distribution of compounds is maintained
Fast development of flavor
Scalable and consistent
Cons:
Needs a recirculation solution
All beer is in contact with hop material
10
Solutions
• Physical Isolation (hop back, hop gun, torpedo)
• Concentrated/cold processed hop products
• Don’t dry hop
Keep Hops Out
• Multi crop and long settle
• Homogenous, dynamic mixing with centrifuge separation
Remove Hops before Cold Processing
11
Chosen Solution:Dynamic Dry hopping with Alfa laval Isomix IMXD & Removal through Westfalia Green Beer Centrifuge
Removes all downstream
issues
Consistency and ability to automate
Reduced Process Time
Scalable
Auxiliary benefits (stirred
fermentation)
Trials & Support
Alfa Laval & Existing Hardware
12
Trial the idea
13
Trial the idea
Alfa laval Isomix IMXD – Trial Unit
14
Taste the idea
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Concentr
ati
on
Time (Hours)
Flavour Components increase with time(Humulenol)
Sensory evaluation & comparison
Samples collected & centrifuged for analysis with GC
Typical results for Humulenol, Geraniol, Humelene
epoxide, 4-MMPOL, Linalool, Myrcene, isoamyl isobutyrate
show flavor development with 3-5 hours.
15
Implementation of Dry hopping Solution(Simplified)
SOLID WASTE
HOP SLURRY TANK
HOP PELLETS →
DE-AERATED WATER →
FERMENTATION TANK MATURATION TANK
CENTRIFUGE
Add Hops Mix Separate
16
Slurrying the
Hops
Hops are added into De-aerated
water
Agitator designed to keep
particles in suspension
Hop pellets swell and ‘dissolve’
Carbon Dioxide used to strip any
Dissolved Oxygen.
17
Adding Hops to Beer
Fermenter is cooled, Yeast is cropped in preparation for dry hopping
Circulation of the beer through the multipurpose line back to the tank via
the Isomix IMXD.
Hop slurry is dosed into recirculating line and hops are mixed through
fermenter.
HOP SLURRY TANK
HOP PELLETS →
DE-AERATED WATER →
FERMENTATION TANK
18
Flavour Development
Flavour develops within 3-5 hours
Be practical
Standardise process times →
consistency
19
Transfer of Green Beer & Removal of Hop Material
SOLID WASTE → SPENT GRAIN / SPENT YEAST / LANDFILL
FERMENTATION TANK MATURATION TANK
CENTRIFUGE
20
Removal of hop material
Isomix IMXD
maintained
homogenous hop load
to centrifuge
Centrifuge separated
all hop solids
Beer losses reduced by
> 50% vs dryhopping in
cold storage
PRE-CENTRIFUGE
POST-CENTRIFUGE
21
Results 3 months
No Blockages
No lost filter capacity
Reduced Extract Loss
Reliability
Consistency
Easy to use
Brewing Technicians – Great Feedback
22
Future
Outlook
Stirred Fermentation
Aroma & Flavour research
Capability for other ingredients
New Beer Styles
23
People who made it
happen
The Whole Brewing Team at The Pride Brewery
Auckland
Alyce Hartvigsen – Alfa Laval
Dave O’Neill – Technical Support
Greg Organ, Richard Tukia – Sensory
Stefan Franz - Automation
Jim Shears, Logan Campbell – Project
Management
NDA - Krones - Alfa Laval - IMS - Becca
24
Questions ?
25
References
Deutscher Hopfenwirtschaftsverband e.V. •
MARKT REPORT NOVEMBER 2017 Economic
Commission of the IHGC
Hop Growers of America 2016 Statistical Report