26
Mr. Udo van Deventer Dry hopping larger volumes: Challenges & Technical Solutions Asia Pacific Convention 2018 | Wellington, New Zealand Institute of Brewing and Distilling Asia Pacific Section 1

Dry hopping larger volumes: Challenges & Technical Solutionsconvention2018.ibdasiapac.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/... · 2018. 8. 28. · (Humulenol) Sensory evaluation & comparison

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Mr. Udo van Deventer

    Dry hopping larger volumes: Challenges & Technical Solutions

    Asia Pacific Convention 2018 | Wellington, New Zealand Institute of Brewing and Distilling Asia Pacific Section1

  • 2

    A bit of history

    Hops are a new thing

    Aroma varieties are BOOMING

    Worldwide more hops have gone

    into the ground, rising by around

    3,000 ha to around 59,200 ha.

    US Aroma & Flavour varieties

    have Quadrupled in 5 Years,

    despite beer volumes

    contracting.

    Source: Hop Growers of America 2016 Statistical Report

  • 3

    Why larger volumes are a problem

  • 4

    Why larger volumes are

    a problem

    Long settling times

    Difficult to crop

    Inconsistent mixing/extraction

    Blocked Heat Exchangers

    Blocked Pipes

    Blocked valves

    Overloaded Centrifuges

    Filtration binding

  • 5

    Hop ‘Clouds’

    or

    Hop ‘Shoulders’ Maturation tanks cropped to remove solids and show ‘clean’ beer

    During Filtration ‘hop bergs’ or ‘hop clouds’

    appear and cause blockage or bind filter.

    During Filtration Towards End ‘Slug’

  • 6

    Factors

    Solubility of Hops

    Brewery Design

    Dynamic

    vs

    Static

    Volume

  • 7

    Getting flavor from hop pellets Hops are not soluble

    10:1 = thick slurry

    Lupulin Glands contain essential oils and resins

    Polar & Non-Polar components = Flavour

    Temperature → faster swelling vs reduced aroma

    20-30 mins

  • 8

    Static Dry hopping

    Advantages:

    Simple

    Replicates pilot plant methods

    Cons: Small exchange surface to volume

    Diffusion into beer can result in stratification

    Solids collect in cone & possibly form ‘clouds’

    Time decided mainly by settling & Compaction

    Flavour lost in cropping

    Extract Loss with hops

  • 9

    Dynamic Dry hopping

    Advantages:

    All beer is in contact with hop material

    Even distribution of compounds is maintained

    Fast development of flavor

    Scalable and consistent

    Cons:

    Needs a recirculation solution

    All beer is in contact with hop material

  • 10

    Solutions

    • Physical Isolation (hop back, hop gun, torpedo)

    • Concentrated/cold processed hop products

    • Don’t dry hop

    Keep Hops Out

    • Multi crop and long settle

    • Homogenous, dynamic mixing with centrifuge separation

    Remove Hops before Cold Processing

  • 11

    Chosen Solution:Dynamic Dry hopping with Alfa laval Isomix IMXD & Removal through Westfalia Green Beer Centrifuge

    Removes all downstream

    issues

    Consistency and ability to automate

    Reduced Process Time

    Scalable

    Auxiliary benefits (stirred

    fermentation)

    Trials & Support

    Alfa Laval & Existing Hardware

  • 12

    Trial the idea

  • 13

    Trial the idea

    Alfa laval Isomix IMXD – Trial Unit

  • 14

    Taste the idea

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

    Concentr

    ati

    on

    Time (Hours)

    Flavour Components increase with time(Humulenol)

    Sensory evaluation & comparison

    Samples collected & centrifuged for analysis with GC

    Typical results for Humulenol, Geraniol, Humelene

    epoxide, 4-MMPOL, Linalool, Myrcene, isoamyl isobutyrate

    show flavor development with 3-5 hours.

  • 15

    Implementation of Dry hopping Solution(Simplified)

    SOLID WASTE

    HOP SLURRY TANK

    HOP PELLETS →

    DE-AERATED WATER →

    FERMENTATION TANK MATURATION TANK

    CENTRIFUGE

    Add Hops Mix Separate

  • 16

    Slurrying the

    Hops

    Hops are added into De-aerated

    water

    Agitator designed to keep

    particles in suspension

    Hop pellets swell and ‘dissolve’

    Carbon Dioxide used to strip any

    Dissolved Oxygen.

  • 17

    Adding Hops to Beer

    Fermenter is cooled, Yeast is cropped in preparation for dry hopping

    Circulation of the beer through the multipurpose line back to the tank via

    the Isomix IMXD.

    Hop slurry is dosed into recirculating line and hops are mixed through

    fermenter.

    HOP SLURRY TANK

    HOP PELLETS →

    DE-AERATED WATER →

    FERMENTATION TANK

  • 18

    Flavour Development

    Flavour develops within 3-5 hours

    Be practical

    Standardise process times →

    consistency

  • 19

    Transfer of Green Beer & Removal of Hop Material

    SOLID WASTE → SPENT GRAIN / SPENT YEAST / LANDFILL

    FERMENTATION TANK MATURATION TANK

    CENTRIFUGE

  • 20

    Removal of hop material

    Isomix IMXD

    maintained

    homogenous hop load

    to centrifuge

    Centrifuge separated

    all hop solids

    Beer losses reduced by

    > 50% vs dryhopping in

    cold storage

    PRE-CENTRIFUGE

    POST-CENTRIFUGE

  • 21

    Results 3 months

    No Blockages

    No lost filter capacity

    Reduced Extract Loss

    Reliability

    Consistency

    Easy to use

    Brewing Technicians – Great Feedback

  • 22

    Future

    Outlook

    Stirred Fermentation

    Aroma & Flavour research

    Capability for other ingredients

    New Beer Styles

  • 23

    People who made it

    happen

    The Whole Brewing Team at The Pride Brewery

    Auckland

    Alyce Hartvigsen – Alfa Laval

    Dave O’Neill – Technical Support

    Greg Organ, Richard Tukia – Sensory

    Stefan Franz - Automation

    Jim Shears, Logan Campbell – Project

    Management

    NDA - Krones - Alfa Laval - IMS - Becca

  • 24

    Questions ?

  • 25

    References

    Deutscher Hopfenwirtschaftsverband e.V. •

    MARKT REPORT NOVEMBER 2017 Economic

    Commission of the IHGC

    Hop Growers of America 2016 Statistical Report