Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Prepared for:
Valero Energy Corporation
ERM
May 2013
WC13-3005
Draft Transportation Impact Analysis Report
VALERO BENICIA REFINERYCRUDE BY RAIL PROJECT
DDraft TTranspportati
Vale
Cr
Va
ion Im
ero Be
rude b
lero En
mpact A
nicia R
by Rail
Preergy Co
Analy
Refine
l Proje
epared forporat
ER
May 2
WC13
ysis
ery
ect
for: ion RM
2013
3-3005
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
1.0 IN
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.0 EX
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
3.0 EX
3.
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
NTRODUCTIO
.1 Backgr
.2 Project
.3 Study
.4 Study
.5 Analys
.6 Analys
1.6.1
1.6.2
.7 Signifi
.8 Report
XISTING CON
.1 Project
.2 Study
.3 Existin
2.3.1
2.3.2
.4 Existin
.5 Existin
.6 Existin
.7 Existin
.8 Collisio
.9 Existin
.10 Existin
2.10.1
2.10.2
2.10.3
XISTING PLU
.1 Project
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
ON ................
round ..............
t Description
Purpose .........
Area .................
sis Scenarios ..
sis Methods ...
Unsignalized
Traffic Opera
cance Criteria
t Organization
NDITIONS ....
t Location ......
Area Roadwa
g Pedestrian
Pedestrian F
Bicycle Facili
g Transit Serv
g Freight Rail
g Truck Route
g Emergency
on History ......
g Lane Config
g Intersection
Model App
Model Valid
Intersection
US PROJECT C
t Assumption
oject
Table
......................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
d Intersection
ations Analys
a ..........................
n ........................
......................
...........................
ays ......................
and Bicycle F
Facilities ...........
ities ...................
vice ....................
l ..........................
es .......................
y Vehicle Resp
...........................
gurations and
n Operations .
proach ..............
dation ..............
n Operations
CONDITIONS
ns ........................
e of Conten
.....................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
s ........................
is Software ....
...........................
...........................
.....................
...........................
...........................
acilities ...........
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
ponse Times ..
...........................
d Traffic Volum
...........................
...........................
...........................
Results ...........
S ...................
...........................
nts
......................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
......................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
mes ..................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
......................
..........................
......................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
......................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
......................
...........................
......................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
......................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
......................
...........................
....... 1
......... 1
......... 1
......... 1
......... 3
......... 3
......... 4
......... 4
......... 6
......... 6
......... 8
....... 9
......... 9
......... 9
...... 10
...... 10
...... 10
...... 10
...... 11
...... 13
...... 14
...... 14
...... 15
...... 19
...... 19
...... 19
...... 20
..... 23
...... 23
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
3.
3.
3.
4.0 C
4.
4.
4.
4.
Appendix
Appendix
Figure 1-1
Figure 1-2
Figure 2-1
Figure 2-2
Figure 3-1
Figure 4-1
Figure 4-2
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
.2 Interse
3.2.1
3.2.2
.3 Existin
3.3.1
.4 Emerg
UMULATIVE
.1 Cumul
.2 Cumul
.3 Interse
4.3.1
4.3.2
.4 Cumul
A: Existing Tr
B: Intersectio
1 Regional V
2 Project Stu
1 Average W
2 Existing Co
1 Existing Plu
1 Cumulative
2 Cumulative
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
ection Operat
AM Peak Ho
Off-Peak Ho
g Project Imp
Transit Impa
ency Vehicle
CONDITION
lative Year Vo
lative Year Ro
ection Operat
AM Peak Ho
OFF-Peak Ho
lative Project
raffic Data
on Analysis W
Vicinity Map ...
udy Area..........
Weekday Traff
onditions Inte
us Project Qu
e Conditions I
e Plus Project
oject
tions Results ..
our Operation
our Operation
pacts and Miti
acts ....................
Access ............
NS ..................
olume Forecas
oadway Netwo
tions Results ..
our Operation
our Operation
Impacts and
Ap
Worksheets
List
...........................
...........................
ic Volumes by
ersection Peak
euing Analys
Intersection P
t Queuing Ana
...........................
s Results ........
s Results ........
igation Measu
...........................
...........................
.....................
sts .....................
ork ....................
...........................
s Results ........
ns Results .......
Mitigation M
ppendices
of Figures
...........................
...........................
y Time of Day
k Hour Traffic
is .......................
Peak Hour Tra
alysis ................
..........................
..........................
..........................
ures..................
..........................
..........................
......................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
easures ..........
s
..........................
..........................
y on Park Roa
Volumes and
..........................
affic Volumes
..........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
......................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
ad .......................
d Lane Config
...........................
and Lane Co
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
......................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
gurations .........
...........................
nfigurations .
...........................
...... 24
...... 24
...... 25
...... 30
...... 31
...... 32
..... 34
...... 34
...... 36
...... 36
...... 36
...... 37
...... 42
......... 2
......... 5
...... 17
...... 18
...... 29
...... 35
...... 44
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
Table 1-1
Table 2-1
Table 2-2
Table 2-3
Table 2-4
Table 2-5
Table 2-6
Table 3-1
Table 3-2
Table 3-3
Table 3-4
Table 4-1
Table 4-2
Table 4-3
Table 4-4
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
Unsignalize
Fairfield an
Existing AT
Study Area
Validation
Existing Int
Existing Int
Existing Plu
Existing Plu
Existing Plu
Existing Plu
Cumulative
Cumulative
Cumulative
Cumulative
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
ed Intersectio
nd Suisun Tran
T-Grade Rail O
a Collision His
Criteria Thres
tersection AM
tersection AM
us Project AM
us Project Off
us Project AM
us Project OFF
e Plus Project
e Plus Project
e Plus Project
e Plus Project
oject
List
on LOS Criteria
nsit (FAST) Tra
Operations ......
tory Summar
sholds Compa
M Peak Hour L
M Peak Hour Q
M Peak Hour In
-Peak Hour In
M Peak Hour In
F-Peak Hour I
AM Peak Hou
Off-Peak Hou
AM Peak Hou
Off-Peak Hou
t of Tables
a ........................
ansit Service S
...........................
ry – January 2
arison ...............
Levels of Servi
Queuing WIth
ntersection Le
ntersection Le
ntersection Q
Intersection Q
ur Intersectio
ur Intersectio
ur Intersectio
ur Intersectio
..........................
Summary .......
..........................
009 thru Janu
..........................
ice WIthout R
hout Rail Cros
evels of Servic
evels of Servic
Queuing ...........
Queuing ..........
n Levels of Se
n Levels of Se
n Queuing ....
n Queuing ....
...........................
...........................
...........................
uary 2012 ........
...........................
Rail Crossing A
sing Activity ..
ce .......................
ce .......................
...........................
...........................
ervice ...............
ervice ...............
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
Activity ............
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
......... 6
...... 11
...... 12
...... 15
...... 20
...... 21
...... 22
...... 26
...... 26
...... 27
...... 28
...... 39
...... 39
...... 40
...... 41
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
1.0
1.1
The Valer
The refine
of the mo
Joaquin V
feedstock
oil deliver
provided
1.2
The propo
sources b
refinery b
delivered
expected
at-grade
deliveries
two railca
expected
1.3
The purp
implemen
undertake
assist in
impacts
transporta
and cumu
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
INTRO
BACKG
o Refinery is
ery was built
ost complex re
Valley in Calif
k throughput
ries currently
on Figure 1-1
PROJEC
osed Valero
by rail into the
by railcar, to u
to the refin
to use an exis
railroad cross
would arrive
ar deliveries
to increase th
STUDY
ose of this s
ntation of th
en to maintain
identifying ad
from Project
ation impacts
ulative conditi
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
ODUCTIO
ROUND
located on 88
in 1968 and h
efineries in th
fornia and the
capacity of 17
arrive by pip
1.
CT DESCR
Benicia Refin
e refinery. Th
up to 70,000
ery because
sting Union P
sing at Park
at the refiner
are expected
he number of
PURPOS
study is to e
e Project. Th
n compliance
dditional traf
t activities t
s of the increa
ions.
oject
ON
80 acres nort
has undergon
he United Sta
e Alaskan No
70,000 barrel
peline and m
RIPTION
ery Crude by
he Project wo
barrels per d
train deliver
Pacific Railroad
Road, just ea
ry each day a
d per day, to
f employees a
SE
evaluate pote
he study of
with Californ
ffic controls
to levels of
ased rail cros
h of the Carq
ne significant
tes. The refin
orth Slope, al
s per day and
marine vessels
y Rail Project
ould expand
day, but would
ries would re
d (UPRR) trac
ast of the int
nd in trains u
otaling appro
at the refinery
ential impacts
anticipated
nia Environme
or mitigation
insignificanc
ssings on the
quinez Strait i
modification
nery processe
ong with for
d employs ap
s. A regional
would ship c
the proportio
d not increas
eplace ship d
ck to access th
ersection of
up to 50 railca
oximately 10
y.
s to local ro
impacts to t
ental Quality A
n that may b
ce. This stu
local transpo
in the City of
s and upgrad
es domestic c
eign crudes.
pproximately 4
l vicinity map
crude oil from
on of crude o
se the total v
deliveries. Rai
he refinery, cr
Park Road/Ba
ars in length p
0 railcars. T
oadways and
the transport
Act (CEQA) re
be needed to
dy focuses
ortation netw
Benicia, Calif
des to becom
crude from th
The refinery
480 people. C
p of the refin
m North Ame
oil delivered t
olume of cru
ilcar deliverie
rossing the ex
ayshore Road
per delivery.
The Project i
intersections
tation system
equirements a
o reduce pot
on the pot
work under ex
1
fornia.
me one
he San
has a
Crude
nery is
erican
to the
de oil
es are
xisting
d. The
Up to
is not
s with
m was
and to
tential
tential
xisting
Benicia
Richmond
Pittsburg
Fair�eld
Walnut Creek
Benicia
Richmond
Pittsburg
Fair�eld
Walnut Creek
S O L A N OC O U N T Y
N A P AC O U N T Y
C O N T R A C O S T AC O U N T Y
A L A M E D AC O U N T Y
80
80
680
780
580
680
VALEROBENICIA
REFINERY
12CALIFORNIA
4CALIFORNIA
24CALIFORNIA
242CALIFORNIA
13CALIFORNIA
29CALIFORNIA
37CALIFORNIA
2nFigure 1-1.
Regional VicinityWC13-3005_1-1_RegVic
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
1.4
The five
increased
for analys
1. Pa
2. In
3. I-
4. Pa
5. Pa
The I-680
intersectio
Freeway o
this study
in the pea
trips, and
1.5
Study inte
Scenario
January 2
operation
Scenario
collected
at-grade r
Scenario
to reflect
control de
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
STUDY
intersections
vehicle queu
is.
ark Road / Ba
nterstate 680
680 Northbo
ark Road / Ba
ark Road / Va
0 ramp-termi
ons fall under
operations alo
y. Generally, a
ak direction b
therefore wo
ANALY
ersection ope
1: Existing C
2013 and obs
s were also d
2: Existing P
in January 20
railroad cross
3: Cumulati
year 2035 co
evices as Exist
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
AREA
listed below
ues that could
ayshore Road
(I-680) South
und Off-Ram
ay Vista Court
alero Refinery
inal intersect
r the jurisdicti
ong segments
a freeway ana
by more than
ould not increa
YSIS SCEN
rations were e
Conditions –
served inters
ocumented fo
Plus Project C
013 and assum
ing.
ive No Projec
nditions. The
ting condition
oject
w and shown
d form at inte
bound On-Ra
p / Bayshore
t
y Entrance
tions listed a
on of the City
s of I-680 and
alysis is unde
n three perce
ase peak hou
NARIOS
evaluated for
– Evaluates int
section lane c
or a 7-day pe
Conditions –
ming rail deliv
ct Conditions
e analysis assu
ns.
on Figure
ersections du
amp / Baysho
Road
above fall un
y of Benicia.
d I-780 within
rtaken if a pro
nt. The Proje
r trips on free
the following
tersection op
configuration
eriod in April.
– Evaluates int
veries of up to
s – Cumulative
umes the sam
1-2 are the
uring train cro
ore Road
nder the juri
n the study ar
oject is expec
ect is not exp
eways in the s
g scenarios:
perations base
ns and traffic
tersection op
o 50 railcars i
e No Project t
me intersection
most likely
ossings, and w
isdiction of
rea were not a
cted to increa
pected to gen
study area.
ed on traffic c
c control dev
erations base
n length utiliz
traffic forecas
n lane config
to be affecte
were thus sel
Caltrans; all
analyzed as p
ase peak hou
nerate new v
counts collect
vices. Existin
ed on traffic c
zing the Park
sts were deve
urations and
3
ed by
lected
other
part of
r trips
vehicle
ted in
ng rail
counts
k Road
eloped
traffic
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
Scenario
forecast e
utilizing th
1.6
The oper
qualitative
travel tim
operating
capacity.”
as LOS F.
1.6.1 U
For unsign
Research
With this
The contr
in queue.
At side-st
the left-tu
average d
intersectio
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
4: Cumulati
estimates dev
he Park Road
ANALY
ations of roa
e description
e, delay, and
conditions)
When volum
UNSIGNALIZ
nalized (all-wa
Board’s 2000
method, ope
ol delay inco
Table 1-1 s
treet stop-con
urn moveme
delay and h
ons.
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
ive Plus Proje
veloped unde
at-grade rail
YSIS METH
adway faciliti
of traffic flow
freedom to
to LOS F (w
mes exceed c
ZED INTERS
ay stop-contr
0 Highway Cap
rations are de
rporates dela
summarizes th
ntrolled inter
nt from the
ighest move
oject
ect Condition
r Scenario 3 a
road crossing
HODS
es are descr
w from a veh
maneuver. S
worst operati
capacity, stop
SECTIONS
rolled and sid
pacity Manua
efined by the
ay associated
he relationsh
rsections, the
major street
ement/approa
ns – Evaluates
and assuming
g.
ribed with th
hicle driver’s p
ix levels of se
ing condition
-and-go cond
e-street stop
al (HCM) met
average cont
with decelera
ip between d
delay is calc
, as well as
ach delay ar
s intersection
g rail deliverie
he term “leve
perspective b
ervice are def
ns). LOS E
ditions result
-controlled) i
hod for unsig
trol delay per
ation, accelera
delay and LOS
culated for ea
the intersect
re reported f
operations b
es of up to 5
el of service”
based on fact
fined ranging
corresponds
and operatio
ntersections,
gnalized inter
r vehicle (mea
ation, stoppin
S for unsigna
ach stop-con
tion average.
for side-stre
based on year
0 railcars in l
” (LOS). LOS
ors such as s
g from LOS A
to operation
ons are desig
the Transpor
rsections was
asured in seco
ng, and movi
alized intersec
trolled move
The interse
et stop-cont
4
r 2035
ength
S is a
speed,
A (best
ns “at
nated
tation
used.
onds).
ng up
ctions.
ement,
ection
trolled
Park
Rd
Park Rd
Bays
hore
Rd
Industrial Way
Indiana St
Sprig Dr
Teal Dr
Mallard
Dr
Oregon St
Stone Rd
Park
Rd
Park Rd
Bays
hore
Rd
Industrial Way
Indiana St
Sprig Dr
Teal Dr
Mallard
Dr
Oregon St
Stone Rd
Bay Vista CtBay Vista Ct
Bayshore Rd
Bayshore Rd
680
680
VALEROBENICIA
REFINERY
VALEROBENICIA
REFINERY
1
2
3
4
5
2n
LEGEND
UPRR OverlandRoute (Spur)
UPRR OverlandRoute (Mainline)
Roadway Count Location
Study Intersection1
UPRR At-Grade Crossing
Figure 1-2.
Study AreaWC13-3005_1-2_StudyArea
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
Source: 2000
1.6.2
The traffic
simulation
and bicyc
intersectio
model req
volumes,
study are
also prov
intersectio
evaluate t
1.7
Significan
therefore
intersectio
to interse
below LO
potentially
expected
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
Level of Servic
A
B
C
D
E
F
0 Highway Capac
TRAFFIC
c operations
n software tha
cles. The softw
ons, roundab
quires many
and vehicle b
a as a system
vides an acc
on. VISSIM ha
the congestio
SIGNIFI
ce criteria a
requires mi
on operations
ection operati
OS D. This c
y increase ve
to increase v
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
UNSIG
ce
city Manual.
OPERATIO
analysis for t
at analyzes th
ware can ana
outs, ramp m
components
behavior cha
m and accoun
urate assessm
as the capabil
n that builds
ICANCE C
re used to
tigation. The
s but does no
ons are cons
criteria is typ
ehicle trips a
ehicle trips w
oject
TGNALIZED IN
D
Little
Shor
Avera
Long
Very lo
Extreme intersectio
NS ANALYS
the project ut
he traffic ope
alyze both art
meters, and at
. These com
racteristics. M
nts for queui
ment of ave
ity to simulat
as the roadw
CRITERIA
determine w
e City of Ben
ot provide sta
sidered signif
pically used t
at intersection
within the stud
TABLE 1-1 TERSECTION
Description
e or no delays
rt traffic delays
ge traffic delay
g traffic delays
ong traffic delay
traffic delays wn capacity exce
SIS SOFTWA
tilized the VIS
rations of car
terial and fre
t-grade railro
ponents inclu
Micro-simulati
ng interactio
erage vehicle
te roadway bl
way is blocked
A
whether a pro
nicia General
ndards for at
ficant if the P
to assess im
ns within the
dy area and le
N LOS CRITER
ys
ys
with eeded
ARE
SSIM softwar
rs, trucks, tran
eeway corrido
oad crossings
ude lane geo
ion provides
ns between i
delay and
lockages due
.
oject impact
l Plan provid
t-grade railroa
Project causes
pacts of dev
e study area.
evel of service
RIA
Delay i
<
> 10.
> 15.
> 25.
> 35.
>
re platform. V
nsit vehicles,
ors, signalized
. The develop
ometries, traf
the capabilit
intersections.
queue lengt
to at-grade t
is considere
des a LOS s
ad crossing o
s intersection
velopment pr
. However,
e is not the o
in Seconds
< 10.0
.0 to 15.0
.0 to 25.0
.0 to 35.0
.0 to 50.0
> 50.0
VISSIM is a m
trains, pedest
d and unsign
pment of a V
ffic controls,
ty of analyzin
Micro-simu
ths at each
train crossing
ed significant
standard of
operations. Im
n operations t
rojects that w
the Project i
nly metric tha
6
micro-
trians,
alized
VISSIM
traffic
ng the
ulation
study
gs and
t and
D for
mpacts
to fall
would
is not
at can
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
be used t
solely bas
through in
with inter
at-grade
applicable
Vehicle qu
traffic op
related, th
case durin
volumes a
with resu
Even tho
accommo
adversely
Although
operation
increased
A
t
Additiona
W
lim
by
W
o
W
o
in
W
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
o evaluate im
sed on avera
ndustrial area
mittent at-gr
railroad cros
e to at-grade
ueues that re
erations with
he longer the
ng times of th
are low, it is p
lting vehicle
ugh average
odated within
affect the sur
the City of B
s, the Projec
rail activity o
A Project imp
that impede
intersection a
al significance
Would the Proj
mited to leve
y the county
Would the Proj
r a change in
Would the Pro
r dangerous
ncreased frequ
Would the proj
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
mpacts of incr
age delay inc
as served by a
ade rail activi
sing. Therefo
railroad cross
esult from at-g
hin the vicinit
e vehicle que
he day when t
possible for an
queues acco
e delay migh
the provided
rrounding tra
Benicia does
ct team reco
on at-grade cr
pact would b
other traffic,
and traffic not
criteria consi
ject conflict w
l of service st
congestion m
ject result in
location that
oject substant
intersections)
uency and len
ject result in
oject
reased rail ac
curred on ve
at-grade railro
ity compared
ore, LOS dela
sings.
grade rail act
ty of the at-
ues are, the
traffic volume
n at-grade tra
ommodated w
ht be high d
d storage the
nsportation n
not have ad
mmends the
rossings:
e considered
such as que
t destined ove
idered as part
with an applic
tandards and
management a
a change in t
t result in sub
tially increase
) or incompat
ngth of train c
inadequate e
tivity on the
ehicles at an
oad crossings
to delay at in
y thresholds
tivity have a m
grade crossin
higher the av
es are high. H
ain crossing to
within the sto
during a lon
en it is less li
network.
opted signific
e following c
significant if
eue spillback
er the crossin
t of this study
cable congest
travel deman
agency for de
raffic pattern
stantial safety
traffic hazard
tible uses (e.g
crossings?
mergency acc
surrounding
intersection.
s have a highe
ntersections t
that apply t
major influenc
ng. Vehicle
verage delay
However, duri
o result in ave
orage capacit
ng train cro
ikely that the
cance criteria
riteria to eva
f rail crossing
to the freew
g is unable to
y include:
ion managem
nd measures,
esignated road
s, including e
y risks?
ds due to a d
g. farm equip
cess?
transportatio
. Generally,
er tolerance o
that are not i
to intersectio
ce on roadwa
queues and
becomes. T
ng times of th
erage delays
ty provided a
ssing, if resu
e at-grade tra
a for at-grade
aluate impac
g activity caus
way mainline
o continue alo
ment program
, or other sta
ds and highw
either an incre
design feature
pment), or du
on network. L
people that
of delay assoc
n the vicinity
ons are not r
ay and interse
delay are d
This is certain
he day when
in the LOS F
at the interse
ulting queue
ain crossing w
e railroad cro
ts associated
ses vehicle q
or to an adj
ong the trave
m, including bu
ndards estab
ways?
ease in traffic
e (e.g. sharp c
ue to the prop
7
LOS is
drive
ciated
of an
readily
ection
irectly
ly the
traffic
range
ection.
es are
would
ossing
d with
ueues
jacent
l way.
ut not
lished
levels
curves
posed
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
W
b
1.8
This repor
Chapter
criteria, an
Chapter 2
the proje
volumes,
a review o
Chapter
existing c
crossing.
Chapter 4
discusses
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
Would the Pro
icycle or pede
REPORT
rt is divided in
1 – Introduc
nd organizatio
2 – Existing
ect vicinity, in
and intersect
of reported in
3 – Existing
conditions as
4 – Cumulat
cumulative im
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
oject conflict
estrian facilitie
T ORGAN
nto four chap
ction discuss
on of the repo
Conditions d
ncluding the
ion operation
cidents at the
g Plus Projec
ssuming prop
tive Conditio
mpacts.
oject
with adopte
es, or otherwi
NIZATION
ters as descri
ses the study
ort.
describes the
surrounding
ns. Existing ra
e rail crossing
ct Condition
posed Projec
ons addresses
ed policies, p
ise decrease t
N
bed below:
y purpose, an
transportatio
g roadway n
ail crossing o
g and collision
ns presents r
t railcar deli
s year 2035 c
plans, or prog
the performa
nalysis scena
on facilities a
network, typic
operations are
ns at study int
relevant Proje
veries at the
conditions wit
grams regard
nce or safety
rios and met
nd existing tr
cal peak-hou
e also discuss
tersections.
ect informati
e at-grade P
thout and wi
ding public t
of such facilit
thods, signifi
raffic operatio
ur vehicular
sed in additio
on, and eva
Park Road ra
th the Projec
8
ransit,
ties?
cance
ons in
traffic
nal to
luates
ailroad
ct and
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
2.0
This chap
the study
2.1
The Valer
residentia
bounded
west and
2.2
Regional
Industrial
their locat
Interstate
County to
terminate
axis alon
Interchang
Park Roa
City of Be
the existi
Bayshore
Bayshore
along the
interchang
Industria
situated,
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
EXISTI
ter describes
intersections
PROJEC
ro Benicia Ref
al and comme
by I-680 and
to the north.
STUDY
access to the
Way, Baysho
tions in relatio
e 680 (I-680)
o the north, t
s in the City o
g the south
ges at Baysho
ad is a 2-lane
enicia to the i
ng Union Pa
Road. The po
e Road is a 2
e southeaste
ge with I-680
l Way is a 2
providing ac
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
ING CON
the transpor
.
CT LOCAT
finery is loca
ercial center
d Suisun Bay t
AREA RO
e Project site
ore Road and
on to the Proj
) is a north-s
traversing eas
of Fairfield, w
ern edge of
ore Road and
arterial that
ndustrial area
cific Railroad
osted speed li
-lane arterial
rn edge of
provides acc
2-lane arterial
cess to num
oject
NDITION
rtation system
TION
ted in an ind
of the city, a
to the south,
OADWAY
e is provided
Park Road. T
ject site are s
south freeway
stern Alamed
here it merge
f the Valero
Industrial Wa
connects the
as to the nort
d (UPRR) trac
mit varies fro
that connect
the City of
ess to and fro
l that loops t
erous industr
NS
m in the Proje
dustrial area o
as shown pre
East Channe
YS
primarily fro
The roadways
hown in Figu
y connecting
a County an
es into I-80. I-
Refinery, a
ay provide acc
e industrial po
theast. Its pa
ck at an at-g
m 30 to 35 m
ts the Valero
Benicia, follo
om the south.
through the
rial parcels e
ect study area
of Benicia, Ca
eviously on F
l Road to the
om I-680, wh
s in the study
ure 1-2.
Santa Clara
nd central Co
-680 is oriente
nd provides
cess to the so
ort area along
th largely par
grade railroad
mph.
o Benicia Refi
owing the S
. The posted s
industrial are
either directly
a and the exis
alifornia, nort
Figure 1-1. Th
e east, and Ea
hile local acce
y area are de
County in th
ntra Costa co
ed along a no
two lanes
outhern portio
g the southe
rallels that of
d crossing lo
nery to the i
uisun Bay sh
speed limit is
ea where the
y or via conn
sting operatio
theast of the
he site is gen
ast 2nd Streett
ess is provide
escribed below
he south to S
ounty. The fre
ortheast/sout
in each dire
ons of the ref
astern edge o
f I-680. It inte
ocated just ea
ndustrial port
horeline. A p
35 mph.
Valero Refin
nections with
9
ons of
main
nerally
to the
ed via
w and
Solano
eeway
hwest
ection.
finery.
of the
ersects
ast of
t area
partial
nery is
local
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
streets. A
40 mph.
Bay Vista
2.3
This sectio
2.3.1
Typical p
intersectio
Sidewalks
intersectio
2.3.2
Bicycle fac
B
B
p
B
ad
No desig
General P
2.4
Fairfield a
of Vacavil
Industrial
Road. Fro
route con
Way and
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
partial interc
a Court is a lo
EXISTIN
on describes t
PEDESTR
pedestrian fa
ons. The stud
s are not pr
ons—all unsig
BICYCLE
cilities include
ike paths (Cla
ike lanes (Cl
avement lege
ike routes (Cl
dditional pave
nated bicycle
lan, a future C
EXISTIN
and Suisun Tr
lle to the BA
Way, roughly
om here, the n
tinues via I-6
Bayshore Roa
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
change with I-
ocal street pro
NG PEDES
the existing p
RIAN FACILI
acilities inclu
dy area lacks
rovided alon
gnalized—fea
FACILITIES
e the followin
ass I) – Paved
ass II) – Lan
ends, and sign
ass III) – Desig
ement width
e facilities are
Class III bike r
NG TRAN
ansit (FAST) o
RT station in
y a quarter o
northbound r
80 to the Plea
ad. Headways
oject
-680 provides
oviding direct
STRIAN A
pedestrian and
ITIES
ude sidewalk
s substantial
g any of th
ture crosswal
g:
trails that are
nes on roadw
ns.
gnated roadw
for cyclists.
e provided w
route is plann
SIT SERV
operates an e
the City of W
of a mile east
route continu
asant Hill BAR
and fares are
s access to an
access to two
AND BICY
d bicycle facil
ks, crosswalk
pedestrian fa
he roads in
ks.
e separated fr
ways designa
ways for bicyc
within the stu
ned along Par
VICE
express interc
Walnut Creek
t of the at-gr
ues via I-680
RT Station; bo
e summarized
nd from the n
o industrial p
YCLE FACI
ities in the stu
ks, and ped
acilities, whic
the study a
om roadways
ated for use
cle use by sign
udy area. Ac
k Road south
city route—Ro
k. Route 40 h
rade Union P
to the City o
oth utilize the
d in Table 2-1
north. The po
arcels, from P
ILITIES
udy area.
destrian sign
h is typical o
area, and no
s.
e by bicycles
ns only; may
ccording to t
hwest of Indus
oute 40—that
has one stop
Pacific railroad
of Fairfield, an
I-680 interch
1.
osted speed li
Park Road.
nals at sign
of industrial
one of the
through str
or may not in
the City of B
strial Way.
t connects th
at Park Road
d crossing on
nd the southb
hanges at Indu
10
imit is
alized
areas.
study
riping,
nclude
Benicia
e City
d and
n Park
bound
ustrial
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
Hou
Standa
Nearest S
Source: FAST
2.5
The study
locomotiv
the termin
Francisco
the Benici
to Los Ang
The Valer
industrial
north of P
also serve
just south
and mast-
Train cros
crossing a
placed ad
2013. Th
railcars pe
summary
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
FAIRFIE
Agency
Route
rs of Operation
Headways
ard One-Way Fa
Stop to Project
T Transit Website
EXISTIN
y area is serv
ves across a n
nus for what
Bay Area. A
ia terminus vi
geles Union S
ro Benicia Ref
port area alo
Park Road. Th
es the industri
h of the Park R
-mounted flas
ssing counts
at the Iron W
djacent to the
he video data
er crossing, tim
of the video d
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
ELD AND SU
n
are
t Site P
e (Accessed Febr
NG FREIG
ved by the U
network that s
is commonly
railroad draw
ia the Port of
Station.
finery is serve
ong the south
is spur featur
ial areas north
Road at-grad
shing lights. T
were collecte
Workers Union
e at-grade cr
a was review
me of day for
data is provid
oject
TISUN TRANS
Week
Week
Varie
Park Road and
uary 2013)
GHT RAIL
Union Pacific
spans 23 state
referred to a
wbridge built
f Oakland to S
ed by a spur
heastern edge
es an at-grad
heast of the r
e railroad cro
The freight rai
ed at the Park
n Driveway jus
rossings for t
ed to determ
r each crossin
ded in Table 2
TABLE 2-1 SIT (FAST) TR
kdays
kends
es from $1.50 to
Industrial Way
Railroad (UP
es and 32,000
s the Overlan
in 1930 alon
San Jose, whe
off the Over
e of the City o
de crossing at
refinery. Switc
ossing. The P
il network thr
k Road at-gra
st 700 feet so
the week of
mine the num
ng, and the bl
2-2 and in Ap
RANSIT SERV
FAST
40
20-60 minutes
o $6.75, based
y (0.25 mile eas
PRR), which
0 miles of tra
nd Route, whi
ngside the Be
ere service co
rland Route m
of Benicia and
Park Road, e
ching activity
Park Road cro
rough the stu
ade intersect
outheast of P
Monday, Apr
mber of train
ockage time
ppendix A.
VICE SUMMA
5:30 – 93:30 – 8
No S
s
on distance tra
t of at-grade ra
operates a f
ck. The City o
ch connects C
enicia-Martine
ontinues as th
mainline that
d the refinery
east of Baysho
y between trac
ssing is contr
dy area is sho
tion in additio
Park Road. Vi
ril l5 through
crossings pe
at each at-gr
ARY
9:00 AM 8:00 PM
ervice
aveled
ailroad crossing
leet of over
of Benicia serv
Chicago to th
ez Bridge con
he UPRR Coas
runs betwee
y itself, termin
ore Road. The
cks typically o
rolled by two
own in Figure
on to the at-
ideo cameras
h Sunday, Ap
er day, numb
rade intersect
11
g)
8,000
ves as
he San
nnects
st Line
en the
nating
e spur
occurs
gates
e 1-2.
grade
s were
ril 21,
ber of
tion. A
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
Range of
Average C
Average C
Average N
Average N
Range of
Maximum
% of Cros
Average C
Average C
Average N
Average N
Range of
Maximum
% of Cros
Source: Fehr
As shown
compared
crossings
refinery an
of Park Ro
Valero ref
again to a
The major
on weekd
95 railcar
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
Crossings Per
Crossings Per D
Crossing Durat
Number of Rail
Number of Rail
Number of Ra
m Observed Cro
ssings With Du
Crossings Per D
Crossing Durat
Number of Rail
Number of Rail
Number of Ra
m Observed Cro
ssings With Du
r & Peers, 2013.
n in Table 2-
d to the Iron
at Park Road
nd tracks serv
oad and nort
finery, then e
access the oth
rity of train cr
ays and betw
rs during the
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
EXIS
Measure
Day
Day – Weekday
ion – Weekday
lcars Per Day –
lcars Per Crossi
ilcars Per Cross
ossing Duration
ration Under 5
Day – Weekend
ion – Weekend
lcars Per Day –
lcars Per Crossi
ilcars Per Cross
ossing Duration
ration Under 5
2, the numbe
n Workers U
d is because
ving other ind
h of the Iron
xit the refine
her industrial
rossings at bo
ween 12:00 PM
e weekdays w
oject
TSTING AT-GR
ys
ys
Weekdays
ing - Weekdays
sing - Weekday
n – Weekdays
Minutes – Wee
d
d
Weekend
ing - Weekend
sing - Weekend
n – Weekend
Minutes – Wee
er of train cro
nion Drivewa
the majority
dustrial areas
Workers Unio
ry, cross Park
areas northea
oth at-grade
M and 6:30 PM
were observe
TABLE 2-2 RADE RAIL O
Pa
s
ys
ekdays
d
ekend
ossings is hig
ay intersectio
of switching
northeast of
on Driveway.
k Road, perfo
ast of the refin
intersections
M on weekend
ed on Park
OPERATIONS
ark Road At-GCrossing
4 - 18
10
02:50
95
10
2 - 35
16:17
86%
7
01:42
45
7
2 - 18
05:56
92%
gher at the P
on. The reas
g activity betw
the refinery o
It is commo
rm the track
nery, and vice
occurred bet
ds. An avera
Road, with t
Grade IronDriv
Park Road at-
son for the
ween tracks
occur on the s
on for UPRR t
switching, an
e versa.
tween the 9:0
ge of 10 train
the average
n Workers Univeway At-Grad
Crossing
4 - 6
5
03:15
69
15
2 - 43
24:50
87%
5
00:18
40
8
2 - 18
03:21
100%
-grade interse
higher numb
serving the V
segment just
trains to acce
nd cross Park
00 AM and 7:3
n crossings to
crossing du
12
on de
ection
ber of
Valero
south
ss the
Road
30 PM
otaling
ration
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
estimated
less than
however a
17, 2013 a
Similarly,
minutes,
Wednesda
movemen
which blo
observed
Park Road
lower on w
In additio
Road for
Appendix
crossings
to switchi
crossing i
2.6
The Surfa
routes and
the interc
terminal i
accommo
Truck frei
Benicia R
Freeway s
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
d at 2 minute
5 minutes. Th
a maximum c
around 2:00 P
the majority
however a m
ay, April 17,
nts to disenga
ocks the Iron
maximum cr
d crossing. T
weekends com
on to the vide
the time pe
x A. The UP
across Park R
ing or train c
nformation to
EXISTIN
ce Transporta
d terminal ac
hanges at Bay
intersections
odate large tru
ght moveme
Refinery is loc
signs direct tra
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
s and 50 seco
he majority of
crossing durat
PM.
of train cros
maximum cro
2013 around
age railcars fro
Workers Un
rossing durat
he average n
mpared to we
eo count dat
riod between
PR data prov
Road. It is co
cutting activi
o perform the
NG TRUC
ation Assistan
cess routes.
yshore Road
of the interc
uck turning m
nt through B
cated, and in
affic destined
oject
onds. About
train crossing
tion was obse
ssings on the
ossing durat
d 2:00 PM.
om the locom
ion Driveway
ion is greate
number of tra
eekdays.
a, UPPR also
n January 4th
vides the deliv
mmon for a s
ty. Therefore
e transportatio
K ROUTE
nce Act (STAA
The entire len
and Industria
changes with
movements.
enicia is heav
n the industr
for these ind
86 percent o
gs on Park Ro
erved at 16 m
e Iron Worke
ion was obs
Some trains
motive and at
y for a substa
r at the Iron
ain crossings
provided anh and January
very schedule
single train de
, the video c
on impact ass
ES
A) designates
ngth of I-680
al Way provid
in the study
viest along th
rial port area
dustrial areas
of all crossing
oad had a dur
minutes and 1
ers Union Driv
served at 24
were observ
times trains w
antial period
Workers Un
and duratio
n estimate of
y 14th, 2013;
e but does n
elivery to cros
count data w
sessment for t
two types of
0 is a designat
de local access
area have b
he northern I-
a adjacent to
to use I-680 e
gs on Park Ro
ration typicall
7 seconds on
veway had a
minutes an
ved to perfor
would come t
of time and
nion Driveway
n of each cro
their delivery
the UPPR d
ot provide th
ss Park Road
was the prima
the Project.
f truck routes
ted national n
s to the refine
been designed
-680 corridor
o the Benicia
exits.
oad had a du
ly under 2 mi
n Wednesday,
a duration un
nd 50 second
rm back and
to a complete
d explains wh
y compared t
ossing is gen
y schedule at
ata is provid
he number of
multiple time
ary source of
s: national ne
network route
ery site. The r
d to appropr
r, where the V
a-Martinez B
13
ration
nutes,
, April
nder 2
ds on
forth
e stop,
hy the
to the
nerally
t Park
ded in
f train
es due
f train
etwork
e, and
ramp-
riately
Valero
Bridge.
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
2.7
The City o
According
arrive to s
contract w
staffed en
fire depar
types for
an averag
industrial
incidents
emergenc
City of Be
provided
2.8
The Fede
crossing.
the last th
which a t
Appendix
Collision
Highway P
study area
a total of
occurred
reported
between J
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
EXISTIN
of Benicia Fire
g to the Nati
structure fires
with the Solan
ngine to all e
rtment strives
90 percent of
ge response t
areas along
in 2012 with
cy response ti
enicia. The C
in Appendix
COLLIS
ral Railroad A
According to
hree years. T
train collided
x A.
history data
Patrol’s Statew
a is summariz
f nine collisio
within the v
in the vicinity
January 2009
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
NG EMER
e Department
ional Fire Pro
s within 5 min
no County Em
mergency me
s to reach the
f the total inc
time of 5 min
Park Road a
an average re
ime for the p
ity of Benicia
A.
SION HIST
Administratio
o the FRA, no
The last repor
with a truck
from January
wide Integrat
zed in Table 2
ons were rep
vicinity of the
y of the I-680
and January
oject
RGENCY V
recently prov
otection Asso
nutes of initial
mergency Med
edical calls w
e standard of
idents. In 201
nutes and 13
and Bayshore
esponse time
project study a
a Fire Departm
TORY
on (FRA) prov
train-vehicle
rted collision
k. The FRA
y 2009 throu
ed Traffic Rec
2-3, the data
ported within
e intersection
0 on-ramp in
2012 resulted
VEHICLE R
vided an eme
ociation (NFP
l dispatch. Th
dical Service A
ithin 7 minut
a seven minu
12, the fire de
seconds thro
e Road the fi
of 6 minutes
area was high
ment year 20
vided collisio
collisions we
at the Park R
collision hist
gh January 2
cords System
is also provid
n the study a
n of Park Ro
tersection wi
d in an injury o
RESPONS
ergency respo
PA) standard
he City of Ben
Authority to p
tes from the t
ute response
epartment res
oughout the
ire departme
s and 35 seco
her than the
12 emergenc
on history da
ere reported a
Road at-grade
tory data for
2012 was also
(SWITRS). Th
ded in Appen
area between
oad/Bayshore
th Bayshore
or fatality wit
SE TIMES
onse time ana
1710, fire de
nicia Fire Dep
provide an ad
time the stati
time to all e
sponded to 2
entire City o
ent responded
onds. Thus in
average resp
cy vehicle res
ta for the Pa
at the Park Ro
e crossing wa
the study a
o obtained f
he SWITRS co
ndix A. As sh
n 2009 and 2
e Road. Thr
Road. Neithe
thin the study
alysis for year
epartments s
partment also
dvance life su
ion is alerted
emergency inc
2,099 incident
of Benicia. Fo
d to a total
n 2012, the av
onse for the
ponse time d
ark Road at-
oad crossing w
as in April 19
rea is provid
from the Cali
ollision data fo
hown in Table
2012, six of
ree collisions
er of the coll
y area.
14
2012.
hould
has a
upport
. The
cident
s with
or the
of 27
verage
entire
data is
grade
within
995, in
ded in
fornia
or the
e 2-3,
which
were
lisions
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
ST
1. Park Ro
2. I-680 S
3. I-680 N
4. Park Ro
5. Park Ro
Source: Calif
2.9
Intersectio
between
weekday.
volumes c
Monday,
are show
generally
When this
been iden
collected
worst-cas
hours of a
PM and 6
from appr
AM peak
operation
operation
hours, the
Park Road
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
TUDY AREA C
Location
oad / Bayshore
SB On-Ramp / B
NB Off-Ramp /
oad / Bay Vista
oad / Valero Re
fornia Highway P
EXISTIN
on turning m
6:00 and 9:0
This peak p
collected at P
January 7, 20
n on Figure
occurs betwe
s study was in
ntified. To p
to determine
e scenario of
a typical wee
6:00 to 7:00 P
roximately 7:0
hour are con
s along eastb
s during the
e volumes we
d average dail
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
COLLISION H
n
Road
Bayshore Road
Bayshore Road
Court
efinery Drivewa
Patrol Statewide I
NG LANE
movement an
0 AM, when
period was id
Park Road jus
013 and Sund
2-1. As sh
een 7:15 and 8
nitiated the tim
rovide flexibi
e project imp
f potential Pro
kday, includin
M conditions
00 PM to 6:00
nsidered repre
bound Park Ro
PM peak pe
re estimated
ly traffic coun
oject
THISTORY SUM
Total Collisions
6
3
d 0
0
ay 0
Integrated Traffic
CONFIG
nd vehicle cla
traffic volum
dentified base
st west of the
day, January 1
own on Figu
8:15 AM, whic
me of day in
lity with the
pacts when t
oject impacts
ng the 9:00 to
, and the 9:00
0 AM. Further
esentative of
oad during th
eriod. Althoug
based on the
nts indicate th
TABLE 2-3 MMARY – JAN
s
CollisionInvolving
Pedestrian
0
0
0
0
0
c Records System
URATION
assification co
mes through
ed on an an
e refinery ent
13, 2013. Typ
ure 2-1, the
ch was also co
which the pro
traffic operat
raffic volume
. This study
o 10:00 AM h
0 to 10:00 PM
rmore, operat
operations d
he 9:00 to 10:0
gh weekday c
e average dail
he following a
NUARY 2009
ns g ns
CollisionInvolvingBicyclist
0
0
0
0
0
m, 2013.
NS AND T
ounts were c
the study ar
nalysis of sev
trance; these
pical weekday
peak hour f
onfirmed by t
oject train cro
tions analysis
es in the area
also assess o
hour to be rep
M hour, which
tions along w
uring the PM
00 AM hour a
counts were
ly traffic coun
about the non
9 THRU JANU
ns g ts
CollisionResultinin Injury
0
0
0
0
0
TRAFFIC V
collected on
ea generally
ven days of
counts were
y traffic volum
for typical w
the intersectio
ossings would
s, AM peak p
a are the hig
operational im
presentative o
h is represent
westbound Pa
M peak period
are considere
not collected
nts collected o
n-peak hours:
UARY 2012
ns g y
CollisioResultin
Fatalit
0
0
0
0
0
VOLUME
January 23,
peak on a t
roadway seg
collected bet
mes by time o
weekday cond
on counts.
d occur had n
period counts
ghest to pres
mpacts for off
of 9:00 AM to
tative of cond
rk Road durin
d (3:00 to 6:00
d representat
d for the non
on Park Road
15
ons g in ty
S
2013
typical
gment
tween
of day
ditions
ot yet
s were
sent a
f-peak
o 3:00
ditions
ng the
0 PM);
tive of
-peak
d. The
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
H
H
Thus, the
intersectio
Field reco
were docu
Existing in
shown on
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
Hourly volume
Hourly volume
reduction fac
on counts to e
onnaissance w
umented. The
ntersection la
Figure 2-2. C
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
es between 9:
es between 9:
ctors derived
estimate the n
was performe
ese were used
ane configura
Collected cou
oject
:00 and 10:00
:00 and 10:00
from the Pa
non-peak hou
d in which la
d to corrobor
ations, traffic
unt data is pro
0 AM are abou
0 PM are abou
rk Road daily
ur intersection
ane configura
rate satellite i
control, and
ovided in App
ut 41 percent
ut 91 percent
y counts were
n volumes.
ations, turn po
image observ
peak hour i
pendix A.
lower than th
lower than th
e applied to
ocket lengths
vations public
intersection t
he AM Peak h
he AM peak h
the AM peak
s, and speed
cly available o
traffic volume
16
hour
hour
k hour
limits
online.
es are
Park
Rd
Park Rd
Bays
hore
Rd
Industrial Way
Indiana St
Sprig Dr
Teal Dr
Mallard
Dr
Oregon St
Stone Rd
Park
Rd
Park Rd
Bays
hore
Rd
Industrial Way
Indiana St
Sprig Dr
Teal Dr
Mallard
Dr
Oregon St
Stone Rd
Bay Vista CtBay Vista Ct
Bayshore Rd
Bayshore Rd680
680
VALEROBENICIA
REFINERY
VALEROBENICIA
REFINERY
1
2
3
4
5
Figure 1-1.
Study AreaWC13-3005_1-1_StudyArea
Industrial Way
Industrial Way680
Average Weekday Traffic Volumes – Park Road
0
50
100
150
200
250
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
9:00
10:0
0
11:0
0
12:0
0
13:0
0
14:0
0
15:0
0
16:0
0
17:0
0
18:0
0
19:0
0
20:0
0
21:0
0
22:0
0
23:0
0
Vehi
cle
Coun
t
Time of Day
Peak Hour
4:00
8:00
2n
Westbound
Eastbound
Total
LEGEND
UPRR OverlandRoute (Spur)
UPRR OverlandRoute (Mainline)
Roadway Count Location
Study Intersection1
UPRR At-Grade Crossing
Figure 2-1.
Average Weekday Traffic Volumes by Time of Day – Park RoadWC13-3005_2-1_AvgTrafVol
Park
Rd
Park Rd
Bays
hore
Rd
Industrial Way
Indiana St
Sprig Dr
Teal Dr
Mallard
Dr
Oregon St
Stone Rd
Park
Rd
Park Rd
Bays
hore
Rd
Industrial Way
Indiana St
Sprig Dr
Teal Dr
Mallard
Dr
Oregon St
Stone Rd
Bay Vista CtBay Vista Ct
Bayshore Rd
Bayshore Rd
680
680
VALEROBENICIA
REFINERY
VALEROBENICIA
REFINERY
1
2
3
4
5
Figure 1-1.
Study AreaWC13-3005_1-1_StudyArea
680
Park RdBa
ysho
re R
d
41912
6340190
4 12 22
28 26 376
1
Park Rd
310
5121
0 4
4
I-680 On-Ramp
Bays
hore
Rd
183
31
22 430
2
Park Rd
Refin
ery E
ntran
ce(G
ate 4)
33384
3627221 1
5
Bays
hore
Rd
41746
31
35
3
I-680 Off-RampBa
y Vist
a Ct
2
MAP KEY
VOLUMES KEY
Roadway Count Location
Study Intersection1
UPRR At-Grade Crossing
AM Peak HourTra�c Volumes
XX
UPRR OverlandRoute (Mainline)
UPRR OverlandRoute (Spur)
Stop Sign
Figure 2-2.
Existing ConditionsIntersection Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane ConfigurationsWC13-3005_2-2_ExVol
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
2.10
The highe
which is t
intersectio
descriptio
peak hour
2.10.1
The traffic
simulation
and bicyc
intersectio
model req
volumes, a
2.10.2
During th
model ou
operation
(Volume
Administr
Li
Li
ve
Q
Based on
criterion, w
link volum
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
EXISTIN
est volumes t
the hour that
ons were eva
on of the traff
r LOS and que
MODEL A
c operations
n software tha
cles. The softw
ons, roundab
quires many
and vehicle b
MODEL V
e validation p
tput is within
s. The Fede
III – Guideli
ration, 2003).
ink volumes f
o For vo
o For vo
o For vo
ink volumes f
ersus count v
Queuing at bo
n our previou
which has a n
mes) than the
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
NG INTER
throughout t
t was selecte
aluated based
fic operations
euing results.
APPROACH
analysis for t
at analyzes th
ware can ana
outs, ramp m
components
ehavior chara
VALIDATIO
process, the V
n acceptable l
ral Highway
ines for App
or more than
lumes less th
lumes betwee
lumes greate
for more than
olumes) less t
ttlenecks mat
us experience
narrower tole
criteria sugge
oject
RSECTION
he day gene
ed for analysi
d on the HC
s model deve
H
the project ut
he traffic ope
alyze both art
meters, and at
. These com
acteristics.
N
VISSIM model
evels and the
Administrat
plying Traffic
85 percent o
an 700 vehicl
en 700 and 2,
r than 2,700,
n 85 percent
than 5
tch field obse
e, Fehr & Pe
rance for inte
ested by FHW
N OPERAT
rally occur du
is. Existing A
CM 2000 me
elopment and
tilized the VIS
rations of car
terial and fre
t-grade railro
ponents inclu
output is com
erefore presen
ion (FHWA)
Microsimula
of cases meet
es per hour (v
,700 vph, with
within 400 vp
of cases have
ervations
eers has dev
ersection and
WA.
TIONS
uring the AM
AM Peak Hou
ethod describ
d calibration
SSIM softwar
rs, trucks, tran
eeway corrido
oad crossings
ude lane geo
mpared again
nting a reaso
suggests th
ation Modelin
the following
vph), within 1
hin 15 percen
ph
e a GEH stati
veloped the
interchange
M peak hour
ur operations
bed in Chapt
process, in a
re platform. V
nsit vehicles,
ors, signalized
. The develop
ometries, traf
nst field data
nable approx
he following
ng Software,
g criteria:
100 vph
t
istic (measuri
following ad
volumes (wh
(7:15 to 8:15
s at the five
ter 1. Below
addition to th
VISSIM is a m
trains, pedest
d and unsign
pment of a V
ffic controls,
to determine
ximation of ex
validation c
Federal Hig
ng model vo
dditional valid
ich are aggre
19
5 AM),
study
w is a
he AM
micro-
trians,
alized
VISSIM
traffic
if the
xisting
criteria
ghway
lumes
dation
gated
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
Pe
Table 2-4
The mode
Catego
Link Volum
AggregateVolumes
Visual Inspection
Source: Fe
2.10.3
Existing A
previously
results are
analysis w
As shown
except fo
due to tur
The Existi
collected
morning p
and 7:30
crossings
approxim
crossings
seconds w
grade inte
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
eak-hour volu
4 shows the v
el meets the v
ory C
mes < 700
GEH S
d Interse
Queui
ehr & Peers, 2013
INTERSEC
AM Peak Hou
y described a
e summarized
worksheets are
, all study int
r the Northbo
rning movem
ng AM peak
at the Park
peak period b
PM on week
during the
ately 2 minu
were less tha
were observed
ersection that
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
umes at inters
validation res
validation crite
VALIDATI
Criteria
vph
Statistic
ections
ing
3
CTION OPE
r operations
and the lane
d in Table 2-
e provided in
tersections cu
ound I-680 ra
ents from the
hour analysi
Road at-grad
between 7:00
kdays and bet
weekdays we
utes and 50
an 5 minutes
d during the
t take longer
oject
sections withi
ults for the e
eria threshold
TON CRITERIA
Threshold
100 vph
5
5%
Match
ERATIONS R
at the five st
configuratio
-5 and the qu
Appendix B.
urrently opera
amp-termina
e ramp. Field o
is does not a
de intersectio
to 9:00 AM.
tween 12:00
ere observed
seconds. Of
in duration,
data collectio
than 5 minut
in 5 percent o
existing condi
ds.
TABLE 2-4 A THRESHOL
% Met T
> 85
> 85
100
h observations
RESULTS
tudy intersect
ons and traffi
ueuing results
.
ate at accepta
l intersection
observations
assume a trai
on crossing co
Generally, tra
PM and 6:30
on Park Ro
f the observe
however cro
on period. Ge
es to cross re
of traffic coun
itions VISSIM
LDS COMPAR
Target
5%
5%
0%
tions were ev
ic controls sh
s are summa
able service l
at Bayshore
confirmed th
n crossings d
onfirmed tha
ain crossings
0 PM on wee
oad, with the
ed crossings
ssing duratio
enerally, train
esult in LOS E
nts
models for t
RISON
AM Pea
% Met
100%
100%
100%
--
valuated base
hown on Fig
rized in Tabl
evels during
Road which
he calculated l
during the ho
at no trains c
occurred bet
ekends. An a
e average cro
on Park Ro
ons of up to 1
n crossings at
E or F operatio
the AM peak
ak Period
Pass/Fai
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
ed on the me
gure 2-2. The
e 2-6. Interse
the AM peak
operates at
levels of servi
our. Video c
crossed durin
tween the 9:0
average of 10
ossing durati
oad, 86 perce
16 minutes a
t the Park Roa
ons at the adj
20
hour.
il
ethods
e LOS
ection
k hour
LOS E
ce.
counts
ng the
00 AM
0 train
on of
ent of
nd 17
ad at-
jacent
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
intersectio
Therefore
part of th
vehicle qu
well.
EXIS
1. Park Ro
2. I-680 S
3. I-680 N
4. Park Ro
5. Park Ro
Notes: Bold1. AW
in2. In
Min
3. Thin
Source: Fehr
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
on of Park Ro
, LOS E or F o
he baseline co
ueues to build
STING INTER
Intersect
oad / Bayshore
SB On-Ramp / B
NB Off-Ramp /
oad / Bay Vista
oad / Valero Re
d denotes locatioWSC = all way sttersection. tersection level o
Manual (Transporttersection averag
he analysis presetersection delay r & Peers, 2013.
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
oad/Bayshore
operations at
ondition. The
d up and ext
RSECTION AM
tion
Road
Bayshore Road
Bayshore Road
Court
efinery Drivewa
ons where level oop controlled int
of service based tation Research Bge (worst case apnted in this tablewould be greate
oject
Road, regard
the Park Road
e longer the
end to adjace
TM PEAK HOU
A
Co
A
d
ay
of service threshotersection, SSSC
on average interBoard, 2000). Forpproach). e does not assumer than presented
dless of the tim
d/Bayshore R
train crossin
ent study inte
TABLE 2-5 UR LEVELS OFACTIVITY
ontrol1
AWSC
FREE
SSSC
SSSC
SSSC
old is exceeded. = side street sto
rsection control dr side-street stop
me a train crossind in this table wh
me of day in
Road intersect
g duration, t
ersections, th
F SERVICE W
Delay2
7
2
32 (36
1 (4)
1 (7)
op controlled inte
delay (in secondsp-controlled inter
ng during the AMhen existing rail c
which the tra
tion when rail
he higher the
hus affecting t
WITHOUT RAI
2,3
6)
ersection, Free =
s) according to thrsections, delay is
M peak hour. Exiscrossing activity o
ain crossing o
l activity occu
e probability
their operatio
L CROSSING
LOS
A
A
D (E)
A (A)
A (A)
uncontrolled
he Highway Capas reported as
ting average occurs.
21
occurs.
urs are
is for
ons as
acity
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
EXIS
1. Park Ro
2. I-680 S
3. I-680 N
4. Park Ro
5. Park Ro
Notes: Bold1. N
– 2. Th
woSource: Fehr
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
STING INTER
Intersecti
oad / Bayshore
SB On-Ramp / B
NB Off-Ramp /
oad / Bay Vista
oad / Valero Re
d denotes locatioB – northbound, right turn movemhe analysis preseould be longer thr & Peers, 2013.
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
RSECTION AM
on
Road
Bayshore Road
Bayshore Road
Court
efinery Drivewa
ons where storagSB – southboun
ment. nted in this tablehan presented in
oject
TM PEAK HOU
Movem
NB-LT
NB-R
SB-LT
EB-LT
WB-L
WB-T
NB-L
d NB-T
EB-LR
NB-L
ay
SB-LR
EB-L
WB-T
e length is exceed, EB – eastboun
e does not assumn this table when
TABLE 2-6 R QUEUING
ent1 AvaStor
T
R
TR
TR
L
TR
L
T
R 1
R
R
L
TR
eded. nd, WB – westbou
me a train crossinexisting rail cros
WITHOUT R
ailable rage (ft)
Q
140
275
220
250
200
500
115
200
1,300
275
200
150
950
und, L – left turn
ng during the AMssing activity occ
RAIL CROSSIN
Average Queue Length
(ft)2
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
0
130
0
0
0
0
n movement, T –
M peak hour. Exiscurs.
NG ACTIVITY
MaximumQueue Len
(ft)2
60
90
70
20
190
80
0
0
550
0
40
0
0
through movem
ting queue lengt
22
Y
m gth
ment, R
ths
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
3.0
The propo
to 70,000
amount o
marine ve
crossing
Road/Bay
railcars in
the assum
3.1
The VISSI
weekday A
throughou
operation
therefore
of the Pro
U
le
A
Ty
U
A
A
For the pu
Road duri
network.
minutes t
second bu
delivery w
blockage
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
EXISTI
osed Project w
0 barrels per
of crude oil p
essels. Railca
the existing
shore Road.
length per de
mptions and a
PROJEC
M model dev
AM peak hou
ut a typical
s during this
assuming AM
oject assumpt
p to 100 rail
ength are exp
minimum he
ypical railcar l
p to 200 feet
verage travel
ll switching a
urposes of th
ing AM peak
A train with
to cross Park
uffer time be
would block t
time on Par
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
ING PLU
would expand
day, replacin
processed at
ar deliveries
at-grade rai
The deliverie
elivery, and u
nalysis results
CT ASSUM
veloped for Ex
ur. The AM p
weekday day
s time period
M peak hour c
ions for Existi
cars will be d
ected
eadway of one
length is 60 fe
of locomotiv
speed across
ctivity betwee
his study, a si
hour conditi
h 200 feet of
Road at a sp
efore and afte
traffic on Par
k Road due
oject
US PROJE
d the proport
ng quantities
the refinery.
are expected
lroad crossin
es would arri
p to 100 railc
s for traffic co
MPTIONS
xisting condit
peak hour was
y, thus the P
d. It is not
conditions pro
ng Plus Proje
delivered dail
e hour betwee
eet
ve is expected
s the Park Roa
en tracks will
ngle train cro
ons to determ
f locomotive
peed of 5 mp
er each train
rk Road for a
to the propo
ECT CON
tion of crude
currently rec
Currently th
d to use the
ng at Park R
ve at the ref
car deliveries a
onditions und
S
ions was used
s chosen as it
Project would
certain what
ovides a wors
ect conditions
y, however, s
en Project tra
d per train del
ad at-grade ra
occur within t
ossing of 50 r
mine potentia
and 50 railca
ph. The at-g
crossing on
approximately
osed project
NDITION
oil delivered
ceived by shi
e refinery rec
existing UPR
Road, just ea
finery each d
are expected
der Existing Pl
d to model a
t represents t
d likely have
t time period
st-case scenar
s:
single train d
ain deliveries i
ivery
ailroad crossi
the Valero ref
railcars in len
al impacts to
ars in length
grade crossing
Park Road.
y 8 minutes a
is lower than
NS
to the refine
ip, but would
ceives crude
RR track to a
ast of the in
day and utiliz
per day. This
us Project con
single train c
he worst-case
the greatest
ds trains will
rio analysis. B
deliveries of u
is assumed
ng is 5 mph
finery site no
ngth was assu
the surround
would take
g traffic cont
Therefore, ea
and 18 secon
n other existi
ery by railcar,
d not increas
oil via pipeli
access the ref
tersection of
ze trains up
s chapter disc
nditions.
crossing durin
e traffic opera
t impact to
cross Park
Below is a sum
up to 50 railc
rth of Park Ro
umed to cross
ding transpor
approximate
trols provide
ach 50-railcar
nds. The estim
ing observed
23
to up
se the
ine or
finery,
f Park
to 50
cusses
ng the
ations
traffic
Road;
mmary
cars in
oad
s Park
rtation
ely 7.3
a 30-
r train
mated
d train
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
crossings.
which is n
In additio
included t
Park Road
6:00 to 7
approxim
peak hou
operation
operation
3.2
3.2.1
Existing A
assuming
and the q
during the
of the fiv
affected b
crossings
Road sout
As shown
intersectio
the north
Bayshore
extend ab
observed
crossing a
60 vehicle
operation
at Park Ro
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
. The April 2
nearly double
on, a project i
the 9:00 to 10
d, this study a
:00 PM cond
ately 7:00 PM
r are conside
s along eastb
s during the P
INTERS
AM PEAK
AM peak hou
a 50-railcar t
queuing result
e AM peak ho
ve study inte
by the train c
is expected
th of Park Roa
n in Table 3
on at Industri
bound I-680
Road provide
bout 1,600 fee
to be about 4
at Park Road
es occupying
. Figure 3-1
oad assuming
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
2013 maximu
the blockage
impact analys
0:00 AM hour
assumes the 9
ditions, and t
M to 6:00 AM.
ered represen
bound Park Ro
PM peak peri
SECTION
K HOUR OP
ur and off-pe
train crossing
ts are summa
our is expecte
rsections. Th
crossings ass
to affect the
ad, and along
3-3, queuing
al Way. How
mainline from
es about 1,30
et under wors
460 vehicles a
would result
g approximat
1 shows the e
g Existing AM
oject
m observed t
e time of the t
sis was perfo
r and the 9:00
9:00 to 10:00
the 9:00 to 1
. Furthermore
ntative of op
oad during th
od.
OPERATI
PERATIONS
eak hour op
at Park Road
arized in Tabl
ed to increase
e intersectio
ociated with
operations a
g the northbo
along westb
ever, the 8.3
m the off-ram
0 feet of stor
st-case Projec
at the northbo
in queue spil
ely 1,600 fee
extent of the m
peak hour co
train crossing
train crossing
rmed for the
0 to 10:00 PM
AM hour to b
10:00 PM hou
e, operations
perations duri
he 9:00 to 10:0
IONS RES
RESULTS
erations at t
. The peak ho
le 3-3. As sh
e the delay an
n of Park Ro
the Project.
along Park Ro
und I-680 off
bound Park R
minute train c
mp at Bayshor
rage length an
t conditions.
ound off-ram
llback to the
et would arri
maximum que
onditions.
g duration wa
s due to the p
off-peak hou
M hour. Based
be representa
ur to be rep
along westbo
ing the PM p
00 AM hour a
SULTS
the five study
our LOS resul
hown in Table
nd result in LO
oad/Bay Vista
However, q
oad east of B
f-ramp to Bay
Road is not
crossing wou
re Road. The
nd the averag
The existing
p, thus it is ex
I-680 mainlin
ive at the in
eues expected
as 16 minute
project.
urs of a typic
d on the daily
ative of 9:00 A
presentative o
ound Park Ro
peak period
are considere
y intersection
lts are summa
e 3-1, a 50-ra
OS E or F con
a Court is no
ueuing from
Bayshore Roa
yshore Road.
expected to
ld result in qu
e northbound
ge queue alon
AM peak hou
xpected that
ne during the
ntersection du
d with the Pro
es and 17 sec
cal weekday,
y traffic volum
AM to 3:00 PM
of conditions
oad during th
(3:00 to 6:00
d representat
ns were eval
arized in Tabl
ailcar train cro
nditions at fou
ot expected
the Project’s
ad, along Bay
spill back t
ueues extend
d I-680 off-ram
ng off-ramp w
ur traffic coun
an 8.3 minute
peak hour as
uring the cro
oject train cro
24
conds,
which
mes on
M and
from
he AM
0 PM);
tive of
uated
le 3-1
ossing
ur out
to be
s train
yshore
to the
ing to
mp to
would
nt was
e train
s over
ossing
ossing
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
It is impo
during the
a worst-ca
along wes
peak perio
peak perio
3.2.2
The Existi
railcar tra
3-4. Thre
10:00 AM
the northb
to the Par
peak hou
crossings
PM period
extent of
AM peak
Traffic vo
morning
expected
its close p
resulting q
proposed
be contai
9:00 – 10:0
Generally,
result in L
time of da
Road inte
duration,
intersectio
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
rtant to note
e AM peak pe
ase scenario
stbound Park
od (3:00 – 6:0
od operations
OFF-PEA
ng off-peak h
in crossing at
ee out of the
hour. Vehic
bound I-680 o
rk Road/Valer
ur are similar
of durations
ds, the time o
the maximum
hour conditio
lumes in the
peak period.
to operate at
proximity to
queues would
50-railcar tra
ned within th
00 PM hour.
, train crossin
LOS E or F op
ay in which th
rsection when
the higher t
ons, thus affec
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
e that train cro
eriod. The AM
in the event
k Road during
00 PM). There
s specifically a
AK HOUR OP
hours of 9:00
t Park Road,
e five study in
le queues ass
off-ramp but
ro Refinery Dr
r to what dri
greater than
of train crossi
m queues exp
ons compared
evenings and
As shown in
t LOS A excep
the at-grade
d be no longe
ain crossing w
he provided i
ngs at the Par
erations at th
he train crossi
n rail activity o
the probabilit
cting their op
oject
ossings propo
M peak hour a
that trains cro
g the AM pea
efore, the AM
along westbo
PERATIONS
– 10:00 AM a
LOS results a
ntersections a
sociated with
not onto the
riveway but w
ivers under E
8 minutes alr
ng varies how
pected with t
d to Existing A
d late nights
n Table 3-2,
pt for Park Ro
railroad cros
er than 4 vehi
would block P
intersection s
rk Road at-gr
he adjacent in
ng occurs. Th
occurs are pa
ty is for veh
perations as w
osed by the P
analysis is pro
oss during th
ak hour are si
M peak hour a
ound Park Roa
S RESULTS
and 9:00 – 10
are presented
are expected
the 50-railca
I-680 mainlin
will not reach
Existing no P
ready occur ab
wever. Figure
the Project tra
AM off-peak h
are much lo
during the
oad/Bayshore
ssing. Althou
icles on eithe
Park Road for
storage capac
ade intersect
ntersection of
herefore, LOS
art of the base
icle queues
well.
Project are no
ovided for inf
he morning p
imilar to west
analysis is rep
ad.
0:00 PM were
d in Table 3-
to operate a
r crossing are
ne. Queues a
Industrial Wa
Project condit
bout once a d
e 3-1 provides
ain crossing a
hour conditio
ower within th
9:00 – 10:00
Road, which
ugh the inter
r approach of
r over 8 minu
city at Park R
ion that take
Park Road/B
E or F operat
eline conditio
to build up
ot expected t
formational p
peak hour. In
tbound volum
presentative o
e also evaluat
2 and queuin
at LOS E or F
e expected to
re also expec
ay. These resu
tions already
day between
s a graphical
at Park Road
ns.
he study area
0 PM hour al
would opera
rsection oper
f the intersect
tes, the resul
Road/Basyhor
longer than
ayshore Road
tions at the P
on. The longe
and extend
to cross Park
urposes to pr
addition, vo
mes during th
of the expecte
ted assuming
ng results in
F during the 9
o extend back
ted to extend
ults for the AM
y experience.
the 9:00 AM –
comparison o
assuming Ex
a compared t
ll intersection
ate at LOS F d
rates at LOS
tion. Althoug
ting queues w
e Road durin
5 minutes to
d, regardless o
ark Road/Bay
er the train cro
to adjacent
25
Road
resent
lumes
he PM
ed PM
a 50-
Table
9:00 –
k onto
d back
M off-
Train
– 7:30
of the
xisting
to the
ns are
due to
F, the
gh the
would
ng the
cross
of the
yshore
ossing
study
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
1. Park Roa
2. I-680 SB
3. I-680 NB
4. Park Roa
5. Park Roa
Notes: Bold1. AW
in2. In
Min
3. Th4. TiSource: Fehr
1. Park Roa
2. I-680 SB
3. I-680 NB
4. Park Roa
5. Park Roa
Notes: Bold1. AW
in2. In
Min
3. Tire
4. TiSource: Fehr
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
EXISTING
Location
ad / Bayshore R
On-Ramp / Ba
B Off-Ramp / B
ad / Bay Vista C
ad / Valero Refi
d denotes locatioWSC = all way sttersection. tersection level o
Manual (Transporttersection averag
he No Project aname period reprer & Peers, 2013.
EXISTING
Location
ad / Bayshore R
On-Ramp / Ba
B Off-Ramp / B
ad / Bay Vista C
ad / Valero Refi
d denotes locatioWSC = all way sttersection. tersection level o
Manual (Transporttersection averagme period repre
epresentative of tme period reprer & Peers, 2013.
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
PLUS PROJE
Road
ayshore Road
ayshore Road
Court
inery Driveway
ons where level oop controlled int
of service based tation Research Bge (worst case apalysis scenario dosentative of the 3
PLUS PROJEC
Road
ayshore Road
ayshore Road
Court
inery Driveway
ons where level oop controlled int
of service based tation Research Bge (worst case apsentative of the 9the 9:00 AM to 3sentative of the 7
oject
TECT AM PEAK
Control1
AWSC
FREE
SSSC
SSSC
SSSC
of service threshotersection, SSSC
on average interBoard, 2000). Forpproach). oes not assume a3:00 to 6:00 PM p
TCT OFF-PEAK
Control1
AWSC
FREE
SSSC
SSSC
SSSC
of service threshotersection, SSSC
on average interBoard, 2000). Forpproach). 9:00 AM to 7:00 :00 PM and 6:00 7:00 PM to 6:00 A
TABLE 3-1 K HOUR INTE
No P
Delay2
7
2
32 (36)
1 (4)
1 (7)
old is exceeded. = side street sto
rsection control dr side-street stop
a train crossing dpeak period alon
TABLE 3-2 K HOUR INTE
Existing Plus10:0
Delay2
103
36
67 (74)
1 (4)
14 (21)
old is exceeded. = side street sto
rsection control dr side-street stop
PM period alongto 7:00 PM perio
AM time period a
ERSECTION L
Project3
LOS
A
A
D (E)
A (A)
A (A)
op controlled inte
delay (in secondsp-controlled inter
during the AM peng westbound Pa
ERSECTION L
s Project 9:00 –00 AM3
LOS
F
E
F (F)
A (A)
B (C)
op controlled inte
delay (in secondsp-controlled inter
g eastbound Parkods along westboalong westbound
LEVELS OF SE
Wi
Delay2
102
39
267 (302
1 (4)
47 (84)
ersection, Free =
s) according to thrsections, delay is
eak hour. ark Road.
LEVELS OF SE
– Existing P1
Delay2
113
1
5 (5)
1 (1)
1 (5)
ersection, Free =
s) according to thrsections, delay is
k Road. The timeound Park Road.d and eastbound
ERVICE
ith Project4
2 LOS
F
E
2) F (F)
A (A
) E (F)
uncontrolled
he Highway Capas reported as
ERVICE
Plus Project 9:10:00 PM4
2 LOS
F
A
A (A
A (A
A (A
uncontrolled
he Highway Capas reported as
e period is also
d Park Road.
26
S
)
A)
)
acity
00 –
S
A)
A)
A)
acity
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
Inters
1. Park RoBayshore
2. I-680 SRamp / BRoad
3. I-680 NRamp / BRoad
4. Park RoVista Cou
5. Park RoValero ReDriveway
Notes: Bold1. N
– 2. Th3. TiSource: Fehr
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
EXIS
section M
oad / Road
SB On-ayshore
NB Off-ayshore
oad / Bay urt
oad / efinery
d denotes locatioB – northbound, right turn movemhe No Project aname period reprer & Peers, 2013.
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
STING PLUS P
Movement1
NB-LT
NB-R
SB-LTR
EB-LTR
WB-L
WB-TR
NB-L
NB-T
EB-LR
NB-LR
SB-LR
EB-L
WB-TR
ons where storagSB – southboun
ment. alysis scenario dosentative of the 3
oject
PROJECT AM
Available Storage
(ft)
140
275
220
250
200
500
115
200
1,300
275
200
150
950
e length is exceed, EB – eastboun
oes not assume a3:00 to 6:00 PM p
TABLE 3-3M PEAK HOUR
No Pr
Average Queue
Length (ft)
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
0
130
0
0
0
0
eded. nd, WB – westbou
a train crossing dpeak period alon
R INTERSECT
roject2
Maximum Queue
Length (ft)
60
90
70
20
190
80
0
0
550
0
40
0
0
und, L – left turn
during the AM peng westbound Pa
TION QUEUIN
P
)
AverageQueue
Length (f
0
300
20
20
310
220
0
0
1,640
0
0
0
200
n movement, T –
eak hour. ark Road.
NG
Plus Project3
e
ft)
MaximQueue L
(ft
60
59
90
90
58
58
0
30
2,23
0
40
0
890
through movem
27
mum Length t)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
0
0
ment, R
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
Interse
1. Park RoBayshore
2. I-680 SRamp / BRoad
3. I-680 NRamp / BRoad
4. Park RoVista Cou
5. Park RoValero ReDriveway
Notes: Bold1. N
– 2. Ti
re3. TiSource: Fehr
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
EXIS
ection Mo
oad / Road
S
E
W
SB On-ayshore
NB Off-ayshore
oad / Bay urt
oad / efinery
W
d denotes locatioB – northbound, right turn movemme period repre
epresentative of tme period reprer & Peers, 2013.
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
TING PLUS P
ovement1 AvS
NB-LT
NB-R
SB-LTR
EB-LTR
WB-L
WB-TR
NB-L
NB-T
EB-LR
NB-LR
SB-LR
EB-L
WB-TR
ons where storagSB – southboun
ment. sentative of the 9the 9:00 AM to 3sentative of the 7
oject
PROJECT OFF
vailable Storage
(ft)
Ex
A
Le
140
275
220
250
200
500
115
200
1,300
275
200
150
950
e length is exceed, EB – eastboun
9:00 AM to 7:00 :00 PM and 6:00 7:00 PM to 6:00 A
TABLE 3-4F-PEAK HOUR
xisting Plus Pr10:00 A
Average Queue
ength (ft) Q
0
240
10
10
240
200
0
0
140
0
0
0
20
eded. nd, WB – westbou
PM period alongto 7:00 PM perio
AM time period a
R INTERSECT
roject 9:00 – AM2
Maximum Queue Length
(ft)
70
560
80
40
530
530
0
0
570
0
30
0
180
und, L – left turn
g eastbound Parkods along westboalong westbound
TION QUEUIN
Existing P1
Average Queue
Length (ft
0
10
0
0
20
10
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
n movement, T –
k Road. The timeound Park Road.d and eastbound
NG
Plus Project 9:10:00 PM3
t)
MaximQueue L
(ft)
30
50
30
30
70
30
0
0
40
0
30
0
0
through movem
e period is also
d Park Road.
28
:00 –
mum Length )
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ment, R
Park
Rd
Park
Rd
Bays
hore
Rd
Industrial Way
Indiana StSprig
Dr
Teal Dr
Mallard
Dr
Oregon St
Stone Rd
Park
Rd
Park
Rd
Bays
hore
Rd
Industrial Way
Indiana StSprig
Dr
Teal Dr
Mallard
Dr
Oregon St
Stone Rd
Bay Vista Ct
Bay Vista Ct Bayshore Rd
Bayshore Rd
6th
St
Elm St
McK
inne
y Pl
Elm St
McK
inne
y Pl
6th
St
680
680
VALEROBENICIA
REFINERY
VALEROBENICIA
REFINERY
1
2
3
4
5
2n
LEGEND
UPRR OverlandRoute (Spur)
UPRR OverlandRoute (Mainline)
Study Intersection1
Existing Plus ProjectAM Peak Hour MaximumQueue Length
Existing Plus ProjectO�-Peak Hour MaximumQueue Length
UPRR At-Grade Crossing
Figure 3-1.
Existing Plus Project Queueing AnalysisWC13-3005_3-1_ExQueue
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
3.3
The follow
at-grade c
A
t
Impact 1
crude oil
northbou
deliveries
M
im
cr
w
th
no
el
From a q
because v
off-ramp
crossings
extend ba
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
EXISTIN
wing criteria w
crossings:
A Project imp
that impede
intersection a
– AM Peak
deliveries by
nd I-680 off-
by rail occur
Mitigation Me
mpacts associ
rossings durin
would result in
he northboun
ot cross durin
liminate or m
o Avoid
PM) a
o Insta
street
altern
o Sched
betw
ueuing persp
vehicle queue
from Bayshor
occur outsid
ack onto the I
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
NG PROJE
were applied
pact would b
other traffic,
and traffic not
Hour Queue
rail across Pa
-ramp to Bay
during the AM
easure 1: T
iated with the
ng the morni
n vehicle que
nd I-680 main
ng the AM pe
inimize poten
d to the exten
and the PM co
ll advanced w
ts to alert dr
nate routes
dule Project
een crossings
pective, the P
es that result f
re Road and
de the 6:00 –
-680 mainline
oject
ECT IMPA
to evaluate p
e considered
such as que
t destined ove
es Extend on
ark Road wou
yshore Road
M peak hour,
he Project ap
e increase in
ng peak perio
eues shorter i
nline. The Pro
eak period. I
ntial queuing
nt possible Pr
ommute peak
warning chan
ivers of the t
train crossin
s
roject would
from the train
eventually on
9:00 AM pe
e.
ACTS AND
potential impa
significant if
eue spillback
er the crossin
nto Northbou
ld result in ve
and eventua
resulting in a
pplicant shall
daily train cr
od (6:00 – 9:0
n length and
oject impact
In addition, th
impacts:
roject train cr
k period (3:00
geable messa
train crossing
gs on Park
impede othe
n crossing wo
nto the north
ak period, re
D MITIGA
acts associate
f rail crossing
to the freew
g is unable to
und I-680: T
ehicle queues
ally onto the
a significant
implement
rossings acro
00 AM) when
d duration tha
would be les
he following
rossings durin
0 – 6:00 PM)
age signs on
g on Park Roa
Road with a
er traffic duri
ould likely ext
bound I-680
esulting vehic
ATION M
ed with increa
g activity caus
way mainline
o continue alo
The proposed
s that would s
e northbound
impact.
measures to
ss Park Road
traffic volum
at would not
ss-than-signi
measures are
ng the lunch
I-680 and/o
ad and encou
minimum o
ng the morn
tend onto the
mainline. If t
cle queues ar
EASURES
ased rail activ
ses vehicle q
or to an adj
ong the trave
d increase of
spillback alon
d I-680 main
minimize qu
. Prohibiting
mes are the hi
extend back
ificant if trai
e recommend
hour (12:00 –
r appropriate
urage them t
one hour hea
ing AM peak
e northbound
the proposed
re not expect
30
S
vity on
ueues
jacent
l way.
f daily
ng the
line if
ueuing
g train
ighest
k onto
ns do
ded to
– 1:00
e local
to use
adway
k hour
I-680
d train
ted to
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
If the Proj
of the trac
intersectio
segment
The segm
left-turn l
Park Road
If the pro
side and e
Park Road
resulting q
Existing vi
one train
period. T
17 second
Proposed
increased
would inc
two trips
train cross
3.3.1
FAST ope
area; the
four buse
each direc
planned t
during the
It is likely
bus per h
attemptin
Project w
crossing d
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
ject train cros
cks would ext
ons. Queues
between the
ment of Park R
ane which w
d waiting for t
posed train c
east side of th
d/Bayshore R
queues would
ideo data col
a day that cr
he longest ob
ds, nearly do
project wou
crossing fre
crease the tra
out of the ref
sing duration
TRANSIT
rates one we
nearest bus s
s in each dire
ction during t
to occur duri
e AM peak pe
that Project t
hour travels a
ng to cross Pa
ould increase
duration of ea
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
sings occur d
tend back ont
on the east s
tracks and In
Road between
ill likely be u
the 8.3 minute
crossings occu
he tracks wou
Road would
d not extend b
lected at the
osses Park Ro
bserved existi
ouble the dur
uld increase t
quency is wi
ain frequency
finery) a day,
s that already
T IMPACTS
ekday transit
stop is locate
ection during
the PM comm
ng the AM p
eriod.
train crossing
along Park Ro
rk Road in th
e the train fr
ach Project tr
oject
during the 9:0
to Bayshore R
side of the tra
ndustrial Way
n the at-grade
tilized as a q
e train crossin
ur during the
uld not excee
operate at L
back and affe
Park Road at-
oad with a du
ng train cross
ration of a s
the frequency
thin the curr
on Park Roa
the proposed
y exist today w
route (Route
d at the inter
the AM comm
mute period b
peak period, t
s will occur d
oad in each
e event of a P
requency on
rain trip is low
0 AM – 7:00 P
Road and affe
acks would g
y, affecting ac
e railroad cros
queue storage
ng to clear.
7:00 PM – 6:
d the provide
LOS F condit
ect the operat
-grade railroa
uration over e
sing on Park R
ingle 50-railc
y of 8-minute
rent range of
d by four tra
d crossing du
without the P
e 40) along bo
rsection of Pa
mute period b
between 3:30
thus the Proj
uring the 3:30
direction dur
Project train c
Park Road b
wer than train
PM period, re
ect the operat
generally be c
ccess to and
ssing and Ind
e lane by som
:00 AM period
ed storage ca
tions during
tions of other
ad crossing in
eight minutes
Road was mea
car crossing
e crossings t
f crossing va
ain crossings
ration of eac
roject.
oth direction
ark Road/Ind
between 5:30
and 8:00 PM.
ject is not ex
0 to 8:00 PM
ring the PM
crossing are s
by four train
n crossing du
esulting queue
tions of the I-
contained wit
from Valero
dustrial Way p
me drivers st
d, resulting q
apacity. Only
the hour of
r study interse
ndicates that o
s within the 9
asured at abo
proposed by
that occur in
ariability. Alt
(two trips int
h Project trai
s of Park Roa
ustrial Way.
0 and 9:00 AM
. Project train
xpected to af
period. On a
period. The
mall, but pos
crossings a d
urations that a
es on the wes
680 ramp-ter
thin the Park
refinery drive
provides a two
uck on westb
queues on the
the intersect
the crossing
ections.
on average th
:00 AM to 7:0
out 16 minute
y the Project.
the area, bu
hough the P
to the refiner
n trip is lowe
ad within the
Route 40 pro
M, and five bu
n crossings ar
ffect transit s
average, abou
e chances of
sible. Althoug
day, the prop
already exist
31
st side
rminal
Road
eways.
o-way
bound
e west
ion of
g, but
here is
00 PM
es and
The
ut the
Project
ry and
r than
study
ovides
uses in
re not
ervice
ut one
buses
gh the
posed
today
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
without th
the Vacav
periods, t
increase in
40 during
3.4
The City o
emergenc
a total of
response
area was h
The same
parcels so
the indust
block thei
crossings
month of
Project. T
crossings
Although
trips into
Project tra
proposed
2012 eme
incidents
an emerg
Project wo
Park Road
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
he Project. In
ville Transpor
thus delay ex
n transit delay
the PM peak
EMERG
of Benicia Fire
cy incident typ
f 27 incident
time of 6 min
higher than th
e railroad trac
outh of Park R
trial parcels a
ir only access
that blocked
f April 2013,
Thus, worker
blocking the
the Project w
the refinery
ain trip is low
increased cro
ergency respo
a month occu
ency incident
ould cause th
d and Bayshor
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
n addition, Ro
rtation Center
xperienced b
y incurred by
k commute pe
GENCY VE
e Department
pes for 90 pe
ts along the
nutes and 35
he average re
ck that crosse
Road. The th
nd Bayshore
s point. Video
the driveway
which is abo
s within the
driveways we
would increase
and two trip
wer than train
ossing freque
onse data pro
urred along th
t occurring at
he average em
re Road indus
oject
oute 40 trave
r and the Wa
by Route 40
the Project is
eriod.
EHICLE AC
t strives to re
ercent of the t
industrial are
seconds. The
esponse for th
es Park Road
hree driveway
Road. Thus ex
o counts colle
y for as long
out three tim
three industr
ell over 8 min
e the train fre
s out of the
n crossing du
ency is within
ovided by th
he industrial a
t the same tim
mergency veh
strial areas.
ls along cong
alnut Creek B
buses is var
s within the d
CCESS
each the stan
total incident
eas of Park
e average em
he entire City
d at-grade als
s south of Pa
xisting train m
ected at the I
as 24 minute
es the durat
rial parcels so
utes.
equency withi
refinery) a d
urations that
the current ra
e fire depart
areas of Park
me as a Projec
hicle response
gested segme
BART Station
iable through
delay variabilit
dard of a sev
s. In 2012, th
Road and Ba
mergency resp
of Benicia.
so crosses th
ark Road are
movements w
Iron Workers
es and 50 sec
ion of the tr
outh of Park
in the study a
ay, the propo
already exist
ange of cross
tment, an ave
Road and Bay
ct train crossi
e time to inc
ents of I-80 a
during the w
hout each d
ty already exp
ven minute re
e fire departm
ayshore Road
ponse time fo
he driveways
the only acce
within the stud
Union Drivew
conds on a w
rain crossings
Road alread
area by four t
osed crossing
today withou
sing variability
erage of abo
yshore Road.
ing is low. It
rease to over
and I-680 bet
weekday com
ay. The pot
perienced by
esponse time
ment respond
d with an av
or the Project
of three indu
ess points bet
dy area tempo
way observed
weekday durin
s proposed b
dy experience
rain crossings
g duration of
ut the Projec
y. According t
ut two emer
The probabi
is unlikely th
r 7 minutes fo
32
tween
mmute
tential
Route
to all
ded to
verage
study
ustrial
tween
orarily
d train
ng the
by the
e train
s (two
f each
t. The
to the
gency
ility of
at the
or the
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
Impact 2:
crossing e
M
to
re
Im
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
: Emergency
events, resulti
Mitigation Me
o implement
egards to eme
Coord
event
provid
crossin
indust
The V
emerg
emerg
occurs
mplementatio
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
vehicle respo
ng in a poten
easure 2: Th
the followin
ergency vehic
inate with th
that an emer
e methods o
ng schedule
rial areas dur
Valero refiner
ency respon
encies within
s during the e
on of these me
oject
onse time to s
ntially significa
e Project App
ng measures
cle access:
he City of Be
rgency occurs
of adequately
and alternat
ing the event
ry provides a
se team sho
n the Park Ro
vent of a train
easures would
some portions
ant impact.
plicant shall w
to eliminate
nicia Fire De
s during a Pro
y informing t
e routes to
that a train c
an emergenc
ould be avail
oad and Bays
n crossing on
d reduce the
s of the study
work with em
e or minimiz
epartment to
oject train cro
the Fire Dep
access the P
crosses Park R
cy response
lable to assi
shore Road in
n Park Road.
impact to a le
y area would i
mergency resp
ze potential P
prepare an
ossing. The
partment of t
Park Road an
Road.
team on sit
st with respo
ndustrial area
ess-than-sign
increase durin
ponders in the
Project impa
action plan i
action plan s
the expected
nd Bayshore
te. The refi
onding to o
as if an emer
nificant level
33
ng rail
e area
cts in
in the
hould
train
Road
nery’s
ff-site
gency
l.
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
4.0
A Cumula
discusses
operation
4.1
The latest
year 2035
develop a
run and a
study area
collected
Park EIR.
have not i
overstate
model ne
indicates
the AM pe
Instead o
movemen
percent u
to 2006 a
have not
Therefore
assume fo
Cumulativ
In additio
PM were
the Cumu
estimate t
9:00 – 10:0
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
CUMU
ative conditio
the method
s models und
CUMUL
t version of th
5 volume fore
annual growth
nnual average
a was about 6
in January 20
Comparing
increased dur
future traffic
twork, such a
a significant
eak hour that
of applying m
nt, a 1.5 perce
sed in the Be
and 2013 cou
increased du
, to account f
or the study
ve conditions.
n, Cumulative
estimated by
ulative AM pe
the 9:00 – 10
00 PM foreca
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
ULATIVE
ns analysis w
dology used
der Cumulativ
LATIVE YE
he Solano-Na
ecasts for eac
h rates for th
e growth rate
6.6 percent fo
006 at the int
the 2013 cou
ring the seven
volumes. Se
as widening P
amount of cu
t may overstat
model-based
ent per year g
nicia Business
unt data colle
uring the sev
for the recent
area. Figure
.
e intersection
applying the
eak hour inte
0:00 AM inter
sts.
oject
CONDIT
as performed
to develop
ve No Project
EAR VOL
apa Travel De
ch of the stu
e study area.
es derived. Ac
or the AM pe
tersection of
unts to the 2
n year period,
everal unfund
Park Road to
ut-through tr
te future traff
growth rate
growth rate w
s Park EIR for
ected at the i
ven year per
t economic d
e 4-1 present
n forecasts for
e reduction fa
ersection fore
rsection forec
TIONS
d to identify p
p Cumulative
and Cumulat
UME FOR
mand Model
dy intersectio
Two scenar
ccording to th
eak hour. Feh
Park Road/Ba
2006 counts i
, indicating th
ded roadway
four lanes. A
raffic from I-6
fic volumes in
es to the ex
was applied.
the period b
ntersection o
iod, potentia
downturn, an
ts the weekd
r the off-peak
ctors derived
ecasts. A red
casts and a 9
potential imp
e conditions
tive Plus Proje
RECASTS
(STA Model)
ons. The STA
rio years of th
he STA mode
hr & Peers ob
ayshore Road
ndicates that
hat an annual
improvement
A review of th
680 and East
n the area.
xisting AM p
This rate is s
between 2006
of Park Road/
ally due to th
annual growt
day AM peak
k hours of 9:0
d from the exi
uction factor
percent fact
pacts in year 2
volume for
ect scenarios.
was initially
A Model out
he model, 20
l, the annual g
btained peak
d as part of th
t the total int
growth rate
ts are include
he 2030 STA
2nd Street on
peak hour in
similar to the
and 2030. H
/Bayshore Ro
he recent ec
th rate of 1.5
hour interse
00 – 10:00 AM
isting Park Ro
r of 59 perce
tor was applie
2035. This ch
ecasts and
utilized to de
puts were us
10 and 2030,
growth rate fo
hour traffic c
he Benicia Bu
tersection vo
of 6.6 percen
ed in the 203
model outpu
n Park Road w
ntersection tu
annual rate
However, acco
ad, traffic vo
onomic dow
% is reasona
ection forecas
M and 9:00 –
oad daily cou
ent was appli
ed to estimat
34
hapter
traffic
evelop
sed to
, were
or the
counts
usiness
lumes
nt may
0 STA
ut also
within
urning
of 1.6
ording
lumes
nturn.
ble to
sts for
10:00
nts to
ied to
te the
Park
Rd
Park Rd
Bays
hore
Rd
Industrial Way
Indiana St
Sprig Dr
Teal Dr
Mallard
Dr
Oregon St
Stone Rd
Park
Rd
Park Rd
Bays
hore
Rd
Industrial Way
Indiana St
Sprig Dr
Teal Dr
Mallard
Dr
Oregon St
Stone Rd
Bay Vista CtBay Vista Ct
Bayshore Rd
Bayshore Rd
680
680
VALEROBENICIA
REFINERY
VALEROBENICIA
REFINERY
1
2
3
4
5
Figure 1-1.
Study AreaWC13-3005_1-1_StudyArea
680
Park RdBa
ysho
re R
d
102020
8050250
10 20 30
40 30 500
1
Park Rd
4010
7030
10 10
4
I-680 On-Ramp
Bays
hore
Rd
250
40
30 570
2
Park Rd
Refin
ery E
ntran
ce(G
ate 4)
40510
5035030 10
5
Bays
hore
Rd
55060
40
50
3
I-680 Off-RampBa
y Vist
a Ct
2
MAP KEY
VOLUMES KEY
Roadway Count Location
Study Intersection1
UPRR At-Grade Crossing
AM Peak HourTra�c Volumes
XX
UPRR OverlandRoute (Mainline)
UPRR OverlandRoute (Spur)
Stop Sign
Figure 4-1.
Cumulative ConditionsIntersection Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane ConfigurationsWC13-3005_4-1_CumuVols
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
4.2
Standard
To meet
According
improvem
Pa
Ba
Pa
I-
I-
Although
for the im
Therefore
operation
for the Cu
are also sh
4.3
4.3.1
Cumulativ
and Plus
more deta
4-1 and th
for the no
during the
Road is ex
No Projec
increase t
intersectio
with the P
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
CUMUL
CEQA practic
this definitio
g to the City
ments are plan
ark Road wide
ayshore Road
ark Road/Bay
680/Bayshore
680/Bayshore
the above im
mprovements
, none of the
s analysis. Th
umulative con
hown on Figu
INTERS
AM PEAK
ve AM Peak H
Project cond
ailed Project
he queuing re
orthbound I-6
e AM peak ho
xpected to op
ct conditions
the delay and
on of Park Ro
Project. Howe
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
LATIVE YE
ce is to assum
on, a planned
of Benicia Ca
nned within th
ening to four
d extension fro
yshore Road in
e Road ramp-
e Road interch
mprovements
s has not ye
e improveme
he existing lan
ndition. The
ure 4-1.
SECTION
K HOUR OP
Hour operatio
itions. The Pl
assumptions
esults are sum
680 off-ramp t
our under Cum
perate at LOS
. Assuming a
d result in LO
oad/Bay Vista
ever, queuing
oject
EAR ROA
me future trans
d improveme
apital Improv
he study area:
lanes betwee
om Park Road
ntersection si
-terminal inte
hange improv
are listed in
et been secu
ents identified
ne configurati
e Cumulative
OPERATI
PERATIONS
ons at the five
us Project sc
are provided
mmarized in T
to Bayshore R
mulative No P
S F with queu
a 50-railcar t
OS E or F co
Court is not
g from the Pro
ADWAY N
sportation im
nt must be f
vement Progra
:
en Industrial W
d to Industria
gnalization
rsection signa
vements
the CIP, City
red and the
d above were
ions and traff
year lane co
IONS RES
RESULTS
e study interse
cenario assum
d in Chapter 3
Table 4-3. As
Road, are exp
Project condit
ues extending
train crossing
nditions at fo
expected to
oject’s train c
NETWORK
mprovements t
fully funded
am FY 2011-
Way and Sulp
l Way
alization
of Benicia sta
e timing of t
e assumed as
fic controls w
nfigurations
SULTS
ections were
mes a 50-railc
3. The LOS re
s shown in Ta
pected to ope
tions. The no
g onto the no
g during the
our out of th
be affected b
crossings is ex
K
that are reaso
by the Cum
16 (CIP) the
phur Springs C
aff have confi
their constru
s part of the
were assumed
and traffic co
evaluated as
car train cros
esults are sum
ble 4-1, all in
erate at accep
orthbound off
orthbound I-6
AM peak ho
he five study
by the train cr
xpected to aff
onably forese
mulative Year
following roa
Creek Bridge
irmed that fu
ction is unce
Cumulative
to remain in
ontrol assump
suming No P
sing at Park
mmarized in
ntersections, e
ptable service
f-ramp to Bay
680 mainline
our is expect
intersections
rossings assoc
fect the opera
36
eable.
2035.
adway
nding
ertain.
traffic
place
ptions
Project
Road,
Table
except
levels
yshore
under
ted to
s. The
ciated
ations
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
along Par
northbou
As shown
at Industr
680 main
railcar tra
the Projec
It is impo
during the
a worst-ca
along wes
peak perio
peak perio
4.3.2
The Cumu
50-railcar
4-4. Four
AM hour.
northbou
the Park R
compariso
assuming
Traffic vo
morning
expected
its close p
resulting q
proposed
be contai
9:00 – 10:0
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
rk Road east
nd I-680 off-r
in Table 4-3
rial Way unde
line from the
in crossing at
ct train crossin
rtant to note
e AM peak pe
ase scenario
stbound Park
od (3:00 – 6:0
od operations
OFF-PEA
ulative off-pe
train crossing
r out of the fiv
Vehicle que
nd I-680 off-r
Road/Valero R
on of the exte
Cumulative A
lumes in the
peak period.
to operate at
proximity to
queues would
50-railcar tra
ned within th
00 PM hour.
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
t of Bayshore
ramp to Baysh
3, queuing alo
er Cumulative
e off-ramp at
t Park Road.
ng at Park Ro
e that train cro
eriod. The AM
in the event
k Road during
00 PM). There
s specifically a
AK HOUR OP
ak hours of 9
g at Park Roa
ve study inter
eues associate
ramp but not
Refinery Drive
ent of the ma
AM peak hou
evenings and
As shown
t LOS A excep
the at-grade
d be no longe
ain crossing w
he provided i
oject
e Road, alon
hore Road.
ong westboun
Plus Project
Bayshore Ro
Figure 4-1 s
ad assuming
ossings propo
M peak hour a
that trains cro
g the AM pea
efore, the AM
along westbo
PERATIONS
9:00 – 10:00 A
d, LOS results
rsections are
ed with the 5
t onto the I-6
eway but will
aximum queu
r conditions c
d late nights
in Table 4-2
pt for Park Ro
railroad cros
er than 5 vehi
would block P
intersection s
ng Bayshore
nd Park Road
conditions. Q
oad are expec
shows the ex
Existing AM p
osed by the P
analysis is pro
oss during th
ak hour are si
M peak hour a
ound Park Roa
S RESULTS
AM and 9:00
s are presente
expected to o
50-railcar cros
680 mainline.
not reach Ind
ues expected
compared to C
are much lo
2, during the
oad/Bayshore
ssing. Althou
icles on eithe
Park Road for
storage capac
Road south
d is expected
Queues exten
cted to conti
xtent of the m
peak hour co
Project are no
ovided for inf
he morning p
imilar to west
analysis is rep
ad.
– 10:00 PM w
ed in Table 4
operate at LO
ssing are exp
Queues are a
dustrial Way.
with the Proj
Cumulative A
ower within th
9:00 – 10:00
Road, which
ugh the inter
r approach of
r over 8 minu
city at Park R
of Park Roa
to spill back
nding back to
nue to occur
maximum que
nditions.
ot expected t
formational p
peak hour. In
tbound volum
presentative o
were also eva
4-2 and queui
OS E or F durin
pected to exte
also expected
Figure 4-2 p
ject train cro
AM off-peak h
he study area
0 PM hour a
would opera
rsection oper
f the intersect
tes, the resul
Road/Basyhor
ad, and alon
to the interse
the northbou
r assuming th
eues expected
to cross Park
urposes to pr
addition, vo
mes during th
of the expecte
aluated assum
ng results in
ng the 9:00 –
end back ont
d to extend ba
rovides a gra
ssing at Park
hour condition
a compared t
ll intersection
ate at LOS F d
rates at LOS
tion. Althoug
ting queues w
e Road durin
37
g the
ection
und I-
he 50-
d with
Road
resent
lumes
he PM
ed PM
ming a
Table
10:00
to the
ack to
phical
Road
ns.
to the
ns are
due to
F, the
gh the
would
ng the
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
Generally,
result in L
time of da
Road inte
duration,
intersectio
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
, train crossin
LOS E or F op
ay in which th
rsection when
the higher t
ons, thus affec
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
ngs at the Par
erations at th
he train crossi
n rail activity o
the probabilit
cting their op
oject
rk Road at-gr
he adjacent in
ng occurs. Th
occurs are pa
ty is for veh
perations as w
ade intersect
ntersection of
herefore, LOS
art of the base
icle queues
well.
ion that take
Park Road/B
E or F operat
eline conditio
to build up
longer than
ayshore Road
tions at the P
on. The longe
and extend
5 minutes to
d, regardless o
ark Road/Bay
er the train cro
to adjacent
38
cross
of the
yshore
ossing
study
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
1. Park Roa
2. I-680 SB
3. I-680 NB
4. Park Roa
5. Park Roa
Notes: Bold1. AW
in2. In
Min
3. Th4. TiSource: Fehr
1. Park Roa
2. I-680 SB
3. I-680 NB
4. Park Roa
5. Park Roa
Notes: Bold1. AW
in2. In
Min
3. Tire
4. TiSource: Fehr
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
CUMULATIV
Location
ad / Bayshore R
On-Ramp / Ba
B Off-Ramp / B
ad / Bay Vista C
ad / Valero Refi
d denotes locatioWSC = all way sttersection. tersection level o
Manual (Transporttersection averag
he No Project aname period reprer & Peers, 2013.
CUMULATIV
Location
ad / Bayshore R
On-Ramp / Ba
B Off-Ramp / B
ad / Bay Vista C
ad / Valero Refi
d denotes locatioWSC = all way sttersection. tersection level o
Manual (Transporttersection averagme period repre
epresentative of tme period reprer & Peers, 2013.
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
VE PLUS PRO
Road
ayshore Road
ayshore Road
Court
inery Driveway
ons where level oop controlled int
of service based tation Research Bge (worst case apalysis scenario dosentative of the 3
VE PLUS PROJ
Road
ayshore Road
ayshore Road
Court
inery Driveway
ons where level oop controlled int
of service based tation Research Bge (worst case apsentative of the 9the 9:00 AM to 3sentative of the 7
oject
TJECT AM PEA
Control1
AWSC
FREE
SSSC
SSSC
SSSC
of service threshotersection, SSSC
on average interBoard, 2000). Forpproach). oes not assume a3:00 to 6:00 PM p
TJECT OFF-PEA
Control1
AWSC
FREE
SSSC
SSSC
SSSC
of service threshotersection, SSSC
on average interBoard, 2000). Forpproach). 9:00 AM to 7:00 :00 PM and 6:00 7:00 PM to 6:00 A
TABLE 4-1 AK HOUR IN
No P
Delay2
7
2
410 (484)
1 (5)
1 (8)
old is exceeded. = side street sto
rsection control dr side-street stop
a train crossing dpeak period alon
TABLE 4-2 AK HOUR IN
Cumulative9:00 – 1
Delay2
100
40
152 (170)
1 (4)
25 (44)
old is exceeded. = side street sto
rsection control dr side-street stop
PM period alongto 7:00 PM perio
AM time period a
NTERSECTION
Project3
LOS
A
A
F (F)
A (A)
A (A)
Bold italics indiop controlled inte
delay (in secondsp-controlled inter
during the AM peng westbound Pa
NTERSECTION
e Plus Project 10:00 AM3
LOS
F
E
F (F)
A (A)
C (E)
op controlled inte
delay (in secondsp-controlled inter
g eastbound Parkods along westboalong westbound
N LEVELS OF
Wi
Delay2
100
41
551 (645
1 (5)
76 (128)
cates potential sersection, Free =
s) according to thrsections, delay is
eak hour. ark Road.
N LEVELS OF
Cumula9:00
Delay2
102
1
5 (6)
1 (1)
1 (4)
ersection, Free =
s) according to thrsections, delay is
k Road. The timeound Park Road.d and eastbound
SERVICE
ith Project4
2 LOS
F
E
5) F (F)
A (A
8) F (F)
significant impactuncontrolled
he Highway Capas reported as
SERVICE
tive Plus Proje0 – 10:00 PM4
2 LOS
F
A
A (A
A (A
A (A
uncontrolled
he Highway Capas reported as
e period is also
d Park Road.
39
S
)
A)
)
t.
acity
ect
S
A)
A)
A)
acity
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
Interse
1. Park RoBayshore
2. I-680 SRamp / BRoad
3. I-680 NRamp / BRoad
4. Park RoBay Vista
5. Park RoValero ReDriveway
Notes: Bold1. N
– 2. Th3. TiSource: Fehr
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
CUMU
ection Mo
oad / Road
N
S
E
W
SB On-ayshore
NB Off-ayshore
oad / Court
N
oad / efinery
S
W
d denotes locatioB – northbound, right turn movemhe No Project aname period reprer & Peers, 2013.
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
ULATIVE PLUS
ovement1 ASt
NB-LT
NB-R
SB-LTR
EB-LTR
WB-L
WB-TR
NB-L
NB-T
EB-LR
NB-LR
SB-LR
EB-L
WB-TR
ons where storagSB – southboun
ment. alysis scenario dosentative of the 3
oject
S PROJECT A
Available torage (ft)
140
275
220
250
200
500
115
200
1,300
275
200
150
950
e length is exceed, EB – eastboun
oes not assume a3:00 to 6:00 PM p
TABLE 4-3AM PEAK HO
No Pr
Average Queue
Length (ft)
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
0
2,910
0
0
0
0
eded. nd, WB – westbou
a train crossing dpeak period alon
UR INTERSEC
roject2
Maximum Queue
Length (ft)
70
110
70
60
200
130
0
0
3,060
30
50
0
20
und, L – left turn
during the AM peng westbound Pa
CTION QUEU
P
)
AverageQueue
Length (f
0
340
30
20
370
170
0
10
2,930
0
10
0
400
n movement, T –
eak hour. ark Road.
UING
Plus Project3
e
ft)
MaximQueue L
(ft
60
60
16
11
58
58
0
40
3,06
30
60
0
1,36
through movem
40
mum Length t)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
60
0
0
60
ment, R
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
Interse
1. Park RoBayshore
2. I-680 SRamp / BRoad
3. I-680 NRamp / BRoad
4. Park RoBay Vista
5. Park RoValero ReDriveway
Notes: Bold1. N
– 2. Ti
re3. TiSource: Fehr
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
CUMU
ection Mo
oad / Road
N
S
E
W
W
SB On-ayshore
NB Off-ayshore
E
oad / Court
N
oad / efinery
S
W
d denotes locatioB – northbound, right turn movemme period repre
epresentative of tme period reprer & Peers, 2013.
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
LATIVE PLUS
vement1 ASt
NB-LT
NB-R
SB-LTR
EB-LTR
WB-L
WB-TR
NB-L
NB-T
EB-LR
NB-LR
SB-LR
EB-L
WB-TR
ons where storagSB – southboun
ment. sentative of the 9the 9:00 AM to 3sentative of the 7
oject
S PROJECT O
Available torage (ft)
C
140
275
220
250
200
500
115
200
1,300
275
200
150
950
e length is exceed, EB – eastboun
9:00 AM to 7:00 :00 PM and 6:00 7:00 PM to 6:00 A
TABLE 4-4OFF-PEAK HO
Cumulative Pl– 10:0
Average Queue
Length (ft)
0
280
20
0
290
200
0
0
450
0
0
0
70
eded. nd, WB – westbou
PM period alongto 7:00 PM perio
AM time period a
OUR INTERSE
us Project 9:000 AM2
Maximum Queue
Length (ft)
60
600
100
40
580
580
0
20
1,080
20
30
0
430
und, L – left turn
g eastbound Parkods along westboalong westbound
ECTION QUEU
00 Cumulativ
AverageQueue
Length (f
0
10
0
0
30
10
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
n movement, T –
k Road. The timeound Park Road.d and eastbound
UING
ve Plus Project10:00 PM3
e
ft)
MaximQueue L
(ft
30
50
30
30
100
40
0
0
50
0
30
0
0
through movem
e period is also
d Park Road.
41
t 9:00 –
mum Length t)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ment, R
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
4.4
MEASU
Impact 3
oil delive
northbou
deliveries
M
q
w
From a q
because v
off-ramp
crossings
extend ba
back to In
If the Proj
of the trac
intersectio
segment
periods, a
during the
6:00 PM),
under Cu
and Indus
by some d
If the pro
side and e
Park Road
resulting q
The Propo
increased
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
CUMUL
URES
– AM Peak H
ries by rail a
nd I-680 off-
by rail occur
Mitigation Me
ueues that w
would be less-
ueuing persp
vehicle queue
from Bayshor
occur outsid
ack onto the
ndustrial Way
ject train cros
cks would ext
ons. Queues
between the
affecting acce
e AM peak ho
thus it’s pos
mulative PM
strial Way pro
drivers stuck o
posed train c
east side of th
d/Bayshore R
queues would
osed project
crossing fre
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
LATIVE PR
Hour Queues
across Park R
-ramp to Bay
during the AM
easure 3: Im
would not ext
-than-signific
pective, the P
es that result f
re Road and
de the 6:00 –
I-680 mainlin
along westbo
sings occur d
tend back ont
on the east s
tracks and I
ess to and fro
our are consid
ssible that qu
peak period
ovides a two-
on westbound
crossings occu
he tracks wou
Road would
d not extend b
would increa
quency is wit
oject
ROJECT I
s Extend to N
Road would r
yshore Road
M peak hour,
mplementing
tend back on
cant if trains
roject would
from the train
eventually on
9:00 AM pe
ne. Vehicle qu
ound Park Ro
during the 9:0
to Bayshore R
side of the tra
Industrial Wa
om Valero ref
dered represe
ueues along w
conditions. T
way left-turn
d Park Road w
ur during the
uld not excee
operate at L
back and affe
ase the frequ
thin the exist
MPACTS
Northbound I
result in vehi
and eventua
resulting in a
Mitigation
nto the north
do not cross
impede othe
n crossing wo
nto the north
ak period, re
ueues on the
ad with the P
0 AM – 7:00 P
Road and affe
acks would g
y during the
finery drivewa
entative of op
westbound Pa
The segment
lane which w
waiting for the
7:00 PM – 6:
d the provide
LOS F condit
ect the operat
ency that 8-m
ting range o
AND MIT
I-680: The p
icle queues t
ally onto the
a significant
Measure 1 w
hbound I-680
during the AM
er traffic duri
ould likely ext
bound I-680
esulting vehic
e east side of
Project.
PM period, re
ect the operat
generally be c
9:00 AM to
ays. Operatio
perations duri
ark Road will
of Park Road
will likely be u
e 8.3 minute t
:00 AM period
ed storage ca
tions during
tions of other
minute cross
f crossing va
TIGATION
proposed incre
that would s
e northbound
impact.
would result
0 mainline. T
M peak perio
ng the morn
tend onto the
mainline. If t
cle queues ar
f the tracks w
esulting queue
tions of the I-
contained wit
3:00 PM and
ns along wes
ing the PM pe
extend back
d between th
utilized as a q
train crossing
d, resulting q
apacity. Only
the hour of
r study interse
ings occur in
ariability. Alt
N
ease of daily
pillback alon
d I-680 main
in shorter v
The Project im
d.
ing AM peak
e northbound
the proposed
re not expect
would likely e
es on the wes
680 ramp-ter
thin the Park
d 6:00 to 7:0
stbound Park
eak period (3
k to Industria
e railroad cro
queue storage
g to clear.
queues on the
the intersect
the crossing
ections.
n the area, bu
though the P
42
crude
ng the
line if
vehicle
mpact
k hour
I-680
d train
ted to
extend
st side
rminal
Road
00 PM
Road
:00 to
l Way
ossing
e lane
e west
ion of
g, but
ut the
Project
Draft TransValero BenMay 2013
would inc
two trips
train cross
sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr
crease the tra
out of the ref
sing duration
act Analysis rude by Rail Pro
ain frequency
finery) a day,
s that already
oject
on Park Roa
the proposed
y exist today w
d by four tra
d crossing du
without the P
ain crossings
ration of eac
roject.
(two trips int
h Project trai
to the refiner
n trip is lowe
43
ry and
r than
Park
Rd
Park
Rd
Bays
hore
Rd
Industrial Way
Indiana StSprig
Dr
Teal Dr
Mallard
Dr
Oregon St
Stone Rd
Park
Rd
Park
Rd
Bays
hore
Rd
Industrial Way
Indiana StSprig
Dr
Teal Dr
Mallard
Dr
Oregon St
Stone Rd
Bay Vista Ct
Bay Vista Ct Bayshore Rd
Bayshore Rd
6th
St
Elm St
McK
inne
y Pl
Elm St
McK
inne
y Pl
6th
St
680
680
VALEROBENICIA
REFINERY
VALEROBENICIA
REFINERY
1
2
3
4
5
2n
LEGEND
UPRR OverlandRoute (Spur)
UPRR OverlandRoute (Mainline)
Study Intersection1
Existing Plus ProjectAM Peak Hour MaximumQueue Length
Existing Plus ProjectO�-Peak Hour MaximumQueue Length
UPRR At-Grade Crossing
Figure 4-2.
Cumulative Plus Project Queueing AnalysisWC13-3005_4-2_CumuQueue
APPEND
DIX A: EX
XISTING TTRAFFIC DDATA
Prepared by NDS/ATD
City: Benicia Project #: 13-7021-001Location: Park Road just west of Refinery Entrance (Day 1).StartTime Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon12:00 6 79 1 54 12:15 3 49 1 60 12:30 4 59 6 51 12:45 1 65 14 252 0 64 8 229 22 4811:00 5 47 2 55 1:15 3 59 3 22 1:30 1 81 1 47 1:45 3 13 12 200 3 14 9 138 21 3382:00 4 94 1 38 2:15 0 65 1 42 2:30 3 61 1 51 2:45 3 54 10 274 3 76 6 207 16 4813:00 6 61 2 62 3:15 3 51 5 68 3:30 11 52 3 67 3:45 6 92 26 256 2 95 12 292 38 5484:00 27 56 3 76 4:15 19 54 3 85 4:30 12 48 6 71 4:45 28 65 86 223 5 93 17 325 103 5485:00 35 36 24 67 5:15 25 36 16 89 5:30 37 33 16 63 5:45 47 49 144 154 14 68 70 287 214 4416:00 63 22 34 53 6:15 65 20 33 38 6:30 64 19 47 23 6:45 75 24 267 85 56 27 170 141 437 2267:00 86 16 65 20 7:15 104 7 43 9 7:30 106 6 63 11 7:45 92 5 388 34 62 7 233 47 621 818:00 106 6 72 6 8:15 102 8 43 12 8:30 88 10 70 9 8:45 75 6 371 30 51 5 236 32 607 629:00 88 8 56 6 9:15 61 3 45 9 9:30 50 5 54 7 9:45 67 10 266 26 42 6 197 28 463 54
10:00 57 5 33 5 10:15 61 11 48 12 10:30 73 8 36 4 10:45 44 2 235 26 53 2 170 23 405 4911:00 41 2 47 1 11:15 53 2 42 6 11:30 41 6 16 4 11:45 39 4 174 14 20 4 125 15 299 29Total 1993 1574 1993 1574 1253 1764 1253 1764 3246 3338
CombinedTotal
AM Peak 7:15 AM 7:45 AMVol. 408 247
P.H.F. 0.962 0.858PM Peak 2:00 PM 3:45 PM
Vol. 274 327P.H.F. 0.729 0.861
Percentage 55.9% 44.1% 41.5% 58.5%
Volumes for: Monday, January 07, 2013
65843567 3567 3017 3017
Combined TotalsEastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals
Prepared by NDS/ATD
City: Benicia Project #: 13-7021-001Location: Park Road just west of Refinery Entrance (Day 2).StartTime Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon12:00 6 61 6 71 12:15 6 73 10 62 12:30 6 69 2 59 12:45 3 65 21 268 6 57 24 249 45 5171:00 3 80 3 39 1:15 5 51 14 58 1:30 1 61 3 36 1:45 0 55 9 247 2 60 22 193 31 4402:00 6 65 2 37 2:15 5 68 0 59 2:30 3 72 6 58 2:45 3 62 17 267 2 71 10 225 27 4923:00 4 54 2 59 3:15 7 50 7 61 3:30 11 61 2 59 3:45 12 88 34 253 6 86 17 265 51 5184:00 26 52 6 84 4:15 25 72 8 84 4:30 16 51 10 75 4:45 24 73 91 248 9 64 33 307 124 5555:00 31 40 14 71 5:15 26 55 15 114 5:30 36 39 19 62 5:45 41 41 134 175 22 60 70 307 204 4826:00 63 27 37 60 6:15 54 33 32 39 6:30 76 15 51 32 6:45 72 22 265 97 50 27 170 158 435 2557:00 105 22 67 24 7:15 95 12 57 25 7:30 108 15 47 14 7:45 100 12 408 61 51 16 222 79 630 1408:00 114 12 78 18 8:15 94 10 67 17 8:30 83 10 59 14 8:45 66 9 357 41 42 8 246 57 603 989:00 71 8 51 6 9:15 60 3 55 15 9:30 52 9 48 14 9:45 62 3 245 23 58 9 212 44 457 67
10:00 67 9 44 7 10:15 56 5 37 13 10:30 64 5 60 4 10:45 59 6 246 25 40 3 181 27 427 5211:00 31 1 42 0 11:15 45 5 33 8 11:30 51 3 56 2 11:45 48 1 175 10 62 1 193 11 368 21Total 2002 1715 2002 1715 1400 1922 1400 1922 3402 3637
CombinedTotal
AM Peak 7:15 AM 7:45 AMVol. 417 255
P.H.F. 0.914 0.817PM Peak 12:15 PM 3:45 PM
Vol. 287 329P.H.F. 0.897 0.956
Percentage 53.9% 46.1% 42.1% 57.9%
Volumes for: Tuesday, January 08, 2013
70393717 3717 3322 3322
Combined TotalsEastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals
Prepared by NDS/ATD
City: Benicia Project #: 13-7021-001Location: Park Road just west of Refinery Entrance (Day 3).StartTime Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon12:00 3 75 0 58 12:15 4 63 6 59 12:30 5 62 8 55 12:45 7 78 19 278 4 54 18 226 37 5041:00 9 64 5 54 1:15 2 75 13 53 1:30 4 60 8 46 1:45 2 60 17 259 7 42 33 195 50 4542:00 2 60 0 24 2:15 2 65 2 36 2:30 2 70 0 55 2:45 7 54 13 249 0 75 2 190 15 4393:00 5 59 4 59 3:15 3 59 8 58 3:30 9 57 2 60 3:45 10 77 27 252 5 74 19 251 46 5034:00 23 61 2 78 4:15 20 56 9 94 4:30 15 59 6 66 4:45 30 77 88 253 7 67 24 305 112 5585:00 36 49 10 70 5:15 20 50 17 80 5:30 31 27 14 71 5:45 42 79 129 205 16 79 57 300 186 5056:00 77 92 36 39 6:15 64 66 32 41 6:30 70 24 48 27 6:45 69 20 280 202 60 29 176 136 456 3387:00 109 21 72 22 7:15 105 19 46 21 7:30 113 12 47 17 7:45 102 16 429 68 71 12 236 72 665 1408:00 110 15 87 8 8:15 110 6 62 16 8:30 76 9 49 9 8:45 83 7 379 37 59 7 257 40 636 779:00 57 6 53 6 9:15 78 9 59 9 9:30 55 4 47 9 9:45 50 2 240 21 49 10 208 34 448 55
10:00 53 9 53 2 10:15 54 9 50 7 10:30 41 6 41 3 10:45 51 3 199 27 41 5 185 17 384 4411:00 47 5 38 5 11:15 47 1 55 6 11:30 51 2 49 7 11:45 60 5 205 13 60 4 202 22 407 35Total 2025 1864 2025 1864 1417 1788 1417 1788 3442 3652
CombinedTotal
AM Peak 7:30 AM 7:45 AMVol. 435 269
P.H.F. 0.962 0.773PM Peak 12:30 PM 3:45 PM
Vol. 279 312P.H.F. 0.894 0.830
Percentage 52.1% 47.9% 44.2% 55.8%
Volumes for: Wednesday, January 09, 2013
70943889 3889 3205 3205
Combined TotalsEastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals
Prepared by NDS/ATD
City: Benicia Project #: 13-7021-001Location: Park Road just west of Refinery Entrance (Day 4).StartTime Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon12:00 2 66 4 50 12:15 9 58 4 62 12:30 0 42 6 57 12:45 5 59 16 225 4 47 18 216 34 4411:00 3 67 3 41 1:15 2 51 10 51 1:30 1 76 6 45 1:45 1 62 7 256 3 58 22 195 29 4512:00 4 67 1 46 2:15 1 61 3 41 2:30 1 75 1 49 2:45 3 47 9 250 3 70 8 206 17 4563:00 10 66 4 53 3:15 9 58 6 63 3:30 10 64 4 54 3:45 12 92 41 280 5 96 19 266 60 5464:00 28 61 5 72 4:15 22 52 8 107 4:30 15 52 10 65 4:45 24 55 89 220 9 113 32 357 121 5775:00 35 35 13 61 5:15 20 46 15 84 5:30 40 33 13 69 5:45 54 43 149 157 24 79 65 293 214 4506:00 64 29 34 50 6:15 69 28 32 41 6:30 68 34 41 32 6:45 66 24 267 115 51 36 158 159 425 2747:00 96 24 71 34 7:15 106 16 47 22 7:30 108 14 59 11 7:45 91 14 401 68 65 12 242 79 643 1478:00 105 12 80 17 8:15 95 10 64 14 8:30 78 5 52 6 8:45 63 27 341 54 38 8 234 45 575 999:00 79 10 59 10 9:15 62 9 43 5 9:30 59 11 48 13 9:45 55 3 255 33 40 8 190 36 445 69
10:00 51 5 49 5 10:15 52 10 42 11 10:30 41 7 37 8 10:45 47 3 191 25 39 5 167 29 358 5411:00 53 3 43 5 11:15 50 1 43 7 11:30 46 5 52 2 11:45 55 5 204 14 38 2 176 16 380 30Total 1970 1697 1970 1697 1331 1897 1331 1897 3301 3594
CombinedTotal
AM Peak 7:15 AM 7:30 AMVol. 410 268
P.H.F. 0.949 0.838PM Peak 3:00 PM 4:00 PM
Vol. 280 357P.H.F. 0.761 0.790
Percentage 53.7% 46.3% 41.2% 58.8%
Volumes for: Thursday, January 10, 2013
68953667 3667 3228 3228
Combined TotalsEastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals
Prepared by NDS/ATD
City: Benicia Project #: 13-7021-001Location: Park Road just west of Refinery Entrance (Day 5).StartTime Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon12:00 7 60 6 55 12:15 8 55 14 51 12:30 2 51 5 61 12:45 5 51 22 217 5 68 30 235 52 4521:00 1 84 7 58 1:15 3 72 11 56 1:30 1 79 3 60 1:45 3 74 8 309 3 64 24 238 32 5472:00 4 65 1 56 2:15 1 68 0 56 2:30 5 64 4 62 2:45 7 49 17 246 2 87 7 261 24 5073:00 8 53 5 59 3:15 5 63 6 60 3:30 11 60 7 66 3:45 16 72 40 248 5 82 23 267 63 5154:00 27 45 1 70 4:15 18 43 10 97 4:30 19 44 8 70 4:45 27 67 91 199 10 58 29 295 120 4945:00 38 30 15 59 5:15 20 34 11 76 5:30 38 30 16 65 5:45 37 28 133 122 17 54 59 254 192 3766:00 84 23 30 38 6:15 53 15 33 24 6:30 60 22 32 22 6:45 82 14 279 74 55 18 150 102 429 1767:00 89 18 63 27 7:15 121 15 47 16 7:30 96 12 54 15 7:45 103 11 409 56 65 15 229 73 638 1298:00 107 8 96 14 8:15 90 13 54 6 8:30 88 5 65 14 8:45 71 3 356 29 42 10 257 44 613 739:00 69 10 39 2 9:15 54 12 36 6 9:30 57 5 46 7 9:45 36 1 216 28 41 3 162 18 378 46
10:00 30 3 11 10 10:15 73 6 31 11 10:30 39 4 41 4 10:45 41 3 183 16 40 2 123 27 306 4311:00 44 6 32 5 11:15 52 1 34 7 11:30 46 4 45 4 11:45 73 5 215 16 54 2 165 18 380 34Total 1969 1560 1969 1560 1258 1832 1258 1832 3227 3392
CombinedTotal
AM Peak 7:15 AM 7:45 AMVol. 427 280
P.H.F. 0.882 0.729PM Peak 1:00 PM 3:45 PM
Vol. 309 319P.H.F. 0.920 0.822
Percentage 55.8% 44.2% 40.7% 59.3%
Volumes for: Friday, January 11, 2013
66193529 3529 3090 3090
Combined TotalsEastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals
Prepared by NDS/ATD
City: Benicia Project #: 13-7021-001Location: Park Road just west of Refinery Entrance (Day 6).StartTime Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon12:00 5 14 1 19 12:15 5 17 7 25 12:30 0 15 4 16 12:45 2 14 12 60 8 22 20 82 32 1421:00 4 14 2 17 1:15 5 22 9 11 1:30 2 18 9 17 1:45 4 14 15 68 3 19 23 64 38 1322:00 5 18 3 14 2:15 0 25 4 26 2:30 3 24 2 22 2:45 0 22 8 89 0 17 9 79 17 1683:00 8 27 3 22 3:15 0 12 4 27 3:30 6 14 1 23 3:45 8 21 22 74 4 20 12 92 34 1664:00 12 13 6 17 4:15 8 11 4 19 4:30 8 6 4 18 4:45 7 11 35 41 5 15 19 69 54 1105:00 11 8 5 12 5:15 9 10 9 17 5:30 12 5 13 12 5:45 12 5 44 28 5 7 32 48 76 766:00 25 8 7 10 6:15 21 6 16 6 6:30 18 4 14 3 6:45 30 8 94 26 11 4 48 23 142 497:00 31 12 2 5 7:15 26 1 13 12 7:30 34 10 10 4 7:45 19 7 110 30 12 2 37 23 147 538:00 18 4 18 8 8:15 11 4 16 2 8:30 22 3 17 3 8:45 21 5 72 16 25 2 76 15 148 319:00 16 8 22 3 9:15 12 5 18 4 9:30 18 1 16 4 9:45 13 2 59 16 14 0 70 11 129 27
10:00 21 8 18 2 10:15 17 8 14 6 10:30 11 4 20 2 10:45 8 2 57 22 14 2 66 12 123 3411:00 17 5 17 3 11:15 15 1 18 3 11:30 10 3 13 1 11:45 15 1 57 10 27 4 75 11 132 21Total 585 480 585 480 487 529 487 529 1072 1009
CombinedTotal
AM Peak 6:45 AM 11:45 AMVol. 121 87
P.H.F. 0.890 0.806PM Peak 2:15 PM 3:00 PM
Vol. 98 92P.H.F. 0.907 0.852
Percentage 54.9% 45.1% 47.9% 52.1%
Volumes for: Saturday, January 12, 2013
20811065 1065 1016 1016
Combined TotalsEastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals
Prepared by NDS/ATD
City: Benicia Project #: 13-7021-001Location: Park Road just west of Refinery Entrance (Day 7).StartTime Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon12:00 5 12 2 10 12:15 3 9 8 5 12:30 4 10 0 5 12:45 1 11 13 42 2 23 12 43 25 851:00 1 7 4 5 1:15 3 5 3 5 1:30 0 9 1 7 1:45 1 7 5 28 0 3 8 20 13 482:00 2 12 1 10 2:15 0 13 2 9 2:30 1 8 0 13 2:45 1 12 4 45 1 8 4 40 8 853:00 1 8 1 9 3:15 1 6 2 10 3:30 4 11 2 11 3:45 5 11 11 36 1 10 6 40 17 764:00 11 9 2 8 4:15 7 5 5 10 4:30 0 12 1 14 4:45 4 11 22 37 5 7 13 39 35 765:00 2 7 3 10 5:15 5 13 3 11 5:30 5 8 5 12 5:45 5 7 17 35 3 9 14 42 31 776:00 9 8 1 4 6:15 6 9 1 3 6:30 5 12 4 6 6:45 8 6 28 35 3 4 9 17 37 527:00 7 2 5 4 7:15 8 7 4 6 7:30 2 6 4 4 7:45 5 5 22 20 5 6 18 20 40 408:00 12 4 5 2 8:15 13 3 10 3 8:30 7 4 5 2 8:45 4 4 36 15 3 12 23 19 59 349:00 3 3 4 4 9:15 10 8 3 4 9:30 5 1 5 2 9:45 5 6 23 18 6 4 18 14 41 32
10:00 4 4 4 1 10:15 7 2 3 7 10:30 4 2 8 6 10:45 4 0 19 8 6 1 21 15 40 2311:00 6 1 4 2 11:15 5 4 4 2 11:30 8 2 11 1 11:45 12 4 31 11 5 2 24 7 55 18Total 231 330 231 330 170 316 170 316 401 646
CombinedTotal
AM Peak 11:45 AM 11:30 AMVol. 43 31
P.H.F. 0.896 0.705PM Peak 2:00 PM 12:00 PM
Vol. 45 43P.H.F. 0.865 0.467
Percentage 41.2% 58.8% 35.0% 65.0%
Volumes for: Sunday, January 13, 2013
1047561 561 486 486
Combined TotalsEastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-003 Bayshore-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Groups Printed- Unshifted
Bayshore Road
Southbound
Park Road
Westbound
Bayshore Road
Northbound
Park Road
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
06:00 3 2 0 5 36 1 4 41 4 2 58 64 2 0 0 2 112
06:15 1 1 0 2 41 7 6 54 1 3 66 70 0 2 0 2 128
06:30 1 3 0 4 43 6 12 61 5 8 77 90 0 3 0 3 158
06:45 1 3 0 4 46 11 23 80 10 14 99 123 0 8 1 9 216
Total 6 9 0 15 166 25 45 236 20 27 300 347 2 13 1 16 614
07:00 1 2 4 7 39 5 6 50 5 5 101 111 3 2 0 5 173
07:15 4 6 1 11 32 5 15 52 7 8 104 119 2 3 2 7 189
07:30 6 1 2 9 49 9 24 82 2 5 77 84 0 3 2 5 180
07:45 5 3 1 9 62 15 18 95 11 9 104 124 2 6 2 10 238
Total 16 12 8 36 182 34 63 279 25 27 386 438 7 14 6 27 780
08:00 7 2 0 9 44 11 6 61 8 4 83 95 0 7 6 13 178
08:15 8 3 1 12 47 2 9 58 3 1 67 71 1 3 1 5 146
08:30 5 2 4 11 49 4 9 62 10 5 69 84 0 4 1 5 162
08:45 4 2 0 6 44 7 7 58 3 3 60 66 2 4 0 6 136
Total 24 9 5 38 184 24 31 239 24 13 279 316 3 18 8 29 622
Grand Total 46 30 13 89 532 83 139 754 69 67 965 1101 12 45 15 72 2016
Apprch % 51.7 33.7 14.6 70.6 11 18.4 6.3 6.1 87.6 16.7 62.5 20.8
Total % 2.3 1.5 0.6 4.4 26.4 4.1 6.9 37.4 3.4 3.3 47.9 54.6 0.6 2.2 0.7 3.6
Bayshore Road
Southbound
Park Road
Westbound
Bayshore Road
Northbound
Park Road
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15
07:15 4 6 1 11 32 5 15 52 7 8 104 119 2 3 2 7 189
07:30 6 1 2 9 49 9 24 82 2 5 77 84 0 3 2 5 180
07:45 5 3 1 9 62 15 18 95 11 9 104 124 2 6 2 10 238
08:00 7 2 0 9 44 11 6 61 8 4 83 95 0 7 6 13 178
Total Volume 22 12 4 38 187 40 63 290 28 26 368 422 4 19 12 35 785
% App. Total 57.9 31.6 10.5 64.5 13.8 21.7 6.6 6.2 87.2 11.4 54.3 34.3
PHF .786 .500 .500 .864 .754 .667 .656 .763 .636 .722 .885 .851 .500 .679 .500 .673 .825
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-003 Bayshore-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 2
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Bayshore Road
Park
Road P
ark R
oad
Bayshore Road
Right4
Thru12
Left22
InOut Total93 38 131
Rig
ht
63
Thru4
0
Left
187
Out
Tota
lIn
409
290
699
Left28
Thru26
Right368
Out TotalIn211 422 633
Left4
T
hru1
9
Rig
ht
12
Tota
lO
ut
In72
35
107
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-003 Bayshore-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Groups Printed- Bank 1
Bayshore Road
Southbound
Park Road
Westbound
Bayshore Road
Northbound
Park Road
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
06:00 0 1 0 1 13 0 1 14 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 22
06:15 1 0 0 1 11 0 3 14 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 25
06:30 0 3 0 3 11 0 2 13 0 1 8 9 0 1 0 1 26
06:45 1 1 0 2 12 0 1 13 0 1 2 3 0 1 0 1 19
Total 2 5 0 7 47 0 7 54 0 2 27 29 0 2 0 2 92
07:00 0 1 0 1 13 0 1 14 0 1 14 15 0 0 0 0 30
07:15 0 3 0 3 4 0 2 6 0 3 5 8 0 0 0 0 17
07:30 0 1 0 1 7 2 1 10 0 2 4 6 0 0 2 2 19
07:45 2 1 0 3 19 0 0 19 0 1 7 8 0 1 2 3 33
Total 2 6 0 8 43 2 4 49 0 7 30 37 0 1 4 5 99
08:00 1 2 0 3 9 0 1 10 0 2 6 8 0 2 0 2 23
08:15 3 3 0 6 13 0 1 14 1 0 3 4 0 1 0 1 25
08:30 0 2 0 2 18 0 0 18 0 2 12 14 0 0 0 0 34
08:45 0 1 0 1 20 0 1 21 0 2 6 8 0 1 0 1 31
Total 4 8 0 12 60 0 3 63 1 6 27 34 0 4 0 4 113
Grand Total 8 19 0 27 150 2 14 166 1 15 84 100 0 7 4 11 304
Apprch % 29.6 70.4 0 90.4 1.2 8.4 1 15 84 0 63.6 36.4
Total % 2.6 6.2 0 8.9 49.3 0.7 4.6 54.6 0.3 4.9 27.6 32.9 0 2.3 1.3 3.6
Bayshore Road
Southbound
Park Road
Westbound
Bayshore Road
Northbound
Park Road
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45
07:45 2 1 0 3 19 0 0 19 0 1 7 8 0 1 2 3 33
08:00 1 2 0 3 9 0 1 10 0 2 6 8 0 2 0 2 23
08:15 3 3 0 6 13 0 1 14 1 0 3 4 0 1 0 1 25
08:30 0 2 0 2 18 0 0 18 0 2 12 14 0 0 0 0 34
Total Volume 6 8 0 14 59 0 2 61 1 5 28 34 0 4 2 6 115
% App. Total 42.9 57.1 0 96.7 0 3.3 2.9 14.7 82.4 0 66.7 33.3
PHF .500 .667 .000 .583 .776 .000 .500 .803 .250 .625 .583 .607 .000 .500 .250 .500 .846
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-003 Bayshore-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 2
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Bayshore Road
Park
Road P
ark R
oad
Bayshore Road
Right0
Thru8
Left6
InOut Total7 14 21
Rig
ht2
Thru0
Left59
Out
Tota
lIn
38
61
99
Left1
Thru5
Right28
Out TotalIn69 34 103
Left0
T
hru
4
Rig
ht2
Tota
lO
ut
In1
6
7
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-002 Bayshore-I 680 SB On RampSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Groups Printed- UnshiftedBayshore Road
SouthboundDriveway
WestboundBayshore Road
NorthboundI-680 SB On-Ramp
EastboundStart Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
06:00 0 9 30 39 0 0 0 0 2 64 0 66 0 0 0 0 10506:15 0 8 33 41 0 0 0 0 3 70 0 73 0 0 0 0 11406:30 0 11 36 47 0 0 0 0 3 93 0 96 0 0 0 0 14306:45 0 9 39 48 0 0 0 0 2 126 0 128 0 0 0 0 176Total 0 37 138 175 0 0 0 0 10 353 0 363 0 0 0 0 538
07:00 0 10 33 43 0 0 0 0 5 107 0 112 0 0 0 0 15507:15 0 5 36 41 0 0 0 0 4 122 0 126 0 0 0 0 16707:30 0 2 50 52 0 0 0 0 3 85 0 88 0 0 0 0 14007:45 0 19 51 70 0 0 1 1 7 125 0 132 0 0 0 0 203Total 0 36 170 206 0 0 1 1 19 439 0 458 0 0 0 0 665
08:00 0 4 47 51 2 1 0 3 8 97 2 107 0 0 0 0 16108:15 0 2 49 51 1 0 0 1 4 73 1 78 0 0 0 0 13008:30 1 9 43 53 0 0 0 0 4 82 2 88 0 0 0 0 14108:45 0 4 43 47 0 0 1 1 5 66 1 72 0 0 0 0 120Total 1 19 182 202 3 1 1 5 21 318 6 345 0 0 0 0 552
Grand Total 1 92 490 583 3 1 2 6 50 1110 6 1166 0 0 0 0 1755Apprch % 0.2 15.8 84 50 16.7 33.3 4.3 95.2 0.5 0 0 0
Total % 0.1 5.2 27.9 33.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 2.8 63.2 0.3 66.4 0 0 0 0
Bayshore RoadSouthbound
DrivewayWestbound
Bayshore RoadNorthbound
I-680 SB On-RampEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15
07:15 0 5 36 41 0 0 0 0 4 122 0 126 0 0 0 0 16707:30 0 2 50 52 0 0 0 0 3 85 0 88 0 0 0 0 14007:45 0 19 51 70 0 0 1 1 7 125 0 132 0 0 0 0 20308:00 0 4 47 51 2 1 0 3 8 97 2 107 0 0 0 0 161
Total Volume 0 30 184 214 2 1 1 4 22 429 2 453 0 0 0 0 671% App. Total 0 14 86 50 25 25 4.9 94.7 0.4 0 0 0
PHF .000 .395 .902 .764 .250 .250 .250 .333 .688 .858 .250 .858 .000 .000 .000 .000 .826
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-002 Bayshore-I 680 SB On RampSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 2
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Bayshore Road
I-6
80 S
B O
n-R
am
p
Drive
way
Bayshore Road
Right184
Thru30
Left0
InOut Total430 214 644
Rig
ht1
Thru1
Left2
Out
Tota
lIn
2
4
6
Left22
Thru429
Right2
Out TotalIn32 453 485
Left0
T
hru
0
Rig
ht0
Tota
lO
ut
In207
0
207
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-002 Bayshore-I 680 SB On RampSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Groups Printed- Bank 1Bayshore Road
SouthboundDriveway
WestboundBayshore Road
NorthboundI-680 SB On-Ramp
EastboundStart Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
06:00 0 1 13 14 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 2206:15 0 1 11 12 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 2106:30 0 0 13 13 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 2306:45 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 19Total 0 2 51 53 0 0 0 0 2 30 0 32 0 0 0 0 85
07:00 0 2 12 14 0 0 0 0 3 14 0 17 0 0 0 0 3107:15 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 11 0 0 0 0 1807:30 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 8 0 0 0 0 2007:45 0 2 19 21 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 29Total 0 4 50 54 0 0 0 0 7 37 0 44 0 0 0 0 98
08:00 0 2 10 12 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 2208:15 0 0 16 16 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 2108:30 0 2 17 19 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 3408:45 0 0 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 29Total 0 4 65 69 0 0 0 0 2 35 0 37 0 0 0 0 106
Grand Total 0 10 166 176 0 0 0 0 11 102 0 113 0 0 0 0 289Apprch % 0 5.7 94.3 0 0 0 9.7 90.3 0 0 0 0
Total % 0 3.5 57.4 60.9 0 0 0 0 3.8 35.3 0 39.1 0 0 0 0
Bayshore RoadSouthbound
DrivewayWestbound
Bayshore RoadNorthbound
I-680 SB On-RampEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45
07:45 0 2 19 21 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 2908:00 0 2 10 12 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 2208:15 0 0 16 16 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 2108:30 0 2 17 19 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 34
Total Volume 0 6 62 68 0 0 0 0 2 36 0 38 0 0 0 0 106% App. Total 0 8.8 91.2 0 0 0 5.3 94.7 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .750 .816 .810 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .600 .000 .633 .000 .000 .000 .000 .779
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-002 Bayshore-I 680 SB On RampSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 2
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Bayshore Road
I-6
80 S
B O
n-R
am
p
Drive
way
Bayshore Road
Right62
Thru6
Left0
InOut Total36 68 104
Rig
ht0
Thru0
Left0
Out
Tota
lIn
0
0
0
Left2
Thru36
Right0
Out TotalIn6 38 44
Left0
T
hru
0
Rig
ht0
Tota
lO
ut
In64
0
64
Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-001 Bayshore-I 680 NB Off RampSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Groups Printed- UnshiftedBayshore Road
SouthboundDriveway
WestboundBayshore Road
NorthboundI-680 NB Off-Ramp
EastboundStart Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
06:00 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 65 0 7 72 8406:15 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 70 0 9 79 9106:30 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 91 0 9 100 11306:45 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 128 0 22 150 163Total 0 37 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 354 0 47 401 451
07:00 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 103 0 14 117 13207:15 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 119 0 11 130 14407:30 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 80 1 8 89 9907:45 0 17 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 125 2 16 143 168Total 0 35 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 29 427 3 49 479 543
08:00 1 7 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 94 0 11 105 12508:15 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 73 0 7 80 9208:30 1 8 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 73 1 8 82 10208:45 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 64 0 3 67 79Total 2 22 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 40 304 1 29 334 398
Grand Total 2 94 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 82 1085 4 125 1214 1392Apprch % 2.1 97.9 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 89.4 0.3 10.3
Total % 0.1 6.8 0 6.9 0 0 0 0 0 5.9 0 5.9 77.9 0.3 9 87.2
Bayshore RoadSouthbound
DrivewayWestbound
Bayshore RoadNorthbound
I-680 NB Off-RampEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 06:30
06:30 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 91 0 9 100 11306:45 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 128 0 22 150 16307:00 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 103 0 14 117 13207:15 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 119 0 11 130 144
Total Volume 0 35 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 441 0 56 497 552% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 88.7 0 11.3
PHF .000 .875 .000 .875 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .625 .000 .625 .861 .000 .636 .828 .847
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-001 Bayshore-I 680 NB Off RampSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 2
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Bayshore Road
I-6
80 N
B O
ff-R
am
p
Drive
way
Bayshore Road
Right0
Thru35
Left0
InOut Total461 35 496
Rig
ht0
Thru0
Left0
Out
Tota
lIn
0
0
0
Left0
Thru20
Right0
Out TotalIn91 20 111
Left
441
Thru
0
Rig
ht
56
Tota
lO
ut
In0
497
497
Peak Hour Begins at 06:30 Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-001 Bayshore-I 680 NB Off RampSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Groups Printed- Bank 1Bayshore Road
SouthboundDriveway
WestboundBayshore Road
NorthboundI-680 NB Off-Ramp
EastboundStart Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
06:00 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 806:15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 8 0 0 8 1106:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 806:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 7Total 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 30 0 0 30 34
07:00 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 12 0 0 12 1607:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 9 0 0 9 1107:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8 0 0 8 907:45 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 6 9Total 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 35 0 0 35 45
08:00 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 9 0 1 10 1308:15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 608:30 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 11 0 0 11 1408:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 6 0 0 6 8Total 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 31 0 1 32 41
Grand Total 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 96 0 1 97 120Apprch % 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 99 0 1
Total % 0 7.5 0 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 11.7 0 11.7 80 0 0.8 80.8
Bayshore RoadSouthbound
DrivewayWestbound
Bayshore RoadNorthbound
I-680 NB Off-RampEastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00
07:00 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 12 0 0 12 1607:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 9 0 0 9 1107:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8 0 0 8 907:45 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 6 9
Total Volume 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 35 0 0 35 45% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0
PHF .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .729 .000 .000 .729 .703
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-001 Bayshore-I 680 NB Off RampSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 2
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Bayshore Road
I-6
80 N
B O
ff-R
am
p
Drive
way
Bayshore Road
Right0
Thru4
Left0
InOut Total41 4 45
Rig
ht0
Thru0
Left0
Out
Tota
lIn
0
0
0
Left0
Thru6
Right0
Out TotalIn4 6 10
Left35
Thru
0
Rig
ht0
Tota
lO
ut
In0
35
35
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-004 Bay Vista-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Groups Printed- Unshifted
Southbound
Park Road
Westbound
Bay Vista Court
Northbound
Park Road
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
06:00 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 8
06:15 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 10
06:30 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 14
06:45 0 0 0 0 7 14 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 30
Total 0 0 0 0 12 34 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 16 62
07:00 0 0 0 0 2 11 0 13 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 4 18
07:15 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 20
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 15
07:45 0 0 0 0 9 15 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 38
Total 0 0 0 0 13 47 0 60 0 0 1 1 0 30 0 30 91
08:00 0 0 0 0 8 11 0 19 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 27
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 10
08:30 0 0 0 0 7 11 0 18 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 4 23
08:45 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 18
Total 0 0 0 0 17 37 0 54 1 0 4 5 0 19 0 19 78
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 42 118 0 160 1 0 5 6 0 65 0 65 231
Apprch % 0 0 0 26.2 73.8 0 16.7 0 83.3 0 100 0
Total % 0 0 0 0 18.2 51.1 0 69.3 0.4 0 2.2 2.6 0 28.1 0 28.1
Southbound
Park Road
Westbound
Bay Vista Court
Northbound
Park Road
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15
07:15 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 20
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 15
07:45 0 0 0 0 9 15 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 38
08:00 0 0 0 0 8 11 0 19 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 27
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 19 47 0 66 0 0 4 4 0 30 0 30 100
% App. Total 0 0 0 28.8 71.2 0 0 0 100 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .528 .783 .000 .688 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .536 .000 .536 .658
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-004 Bay Vista-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 2
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Park
Road P
ark R
oad
Bay Vista Court
Right0
Thru0
Left0
InOut Total0 0 0
Rig
ht0
Thru4
7
Left19
Out
Tota
lIn
34
66
100
Left0
Thru0
Right4
Out TotalIn19 4 23
Left0
T
hru3
0
Rig
ht0
Tota
lO
ut
In47
30
77
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-004 Bay Vista-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Groups Printed- Bank 1
Southbound
Park Road
Westbound
Bay Vista Court
Northbound
Park Road
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2
06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3
Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 7
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
08:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 2 5
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 1 2 0 10 0 10 15
Apprch % 0 0 0 0 100 0 50 0 50 0 100 0
Total % 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 6.7 0 6.7 13.3 0 66.7 0 66.7
Southbound
Park Road
Westbound
Bay Vista Court
Northbound
Park Road
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 6 0 6 9
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .500 .000 .500 .563
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-004 Bay Vista-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 2
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Park
Road P
ark R
oad
Bay Vista Court
Right0
Thru0
Left0
InOut Total0 0 0
Rig
ht0
Thru2
Left0
Out
Tota
lIn
7
2
9
Left0
Thru0
Right1
Out TotalIn0 1 1
Left0
T
hru
6
Rig
ht0
Tota
lO
ut
In2
6
8
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-005 Valero Refinery-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Groups Printed- Unshifted
Valero Refinery Entrance
Southbound
Park Road
Westbound Northbound
Park Road
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
06:00 1 0 0 1 0 38 1 39 0 0 0 0 5 56 0 61 101
06:15 2 0 0 2 0 51 7 58 0 0 0 0 10 57 0 67 127
06:30 0 0 6 6 0 54 8 62 0 0 0 0 9 75 0 84 152
06:45 0 0 3 3 0 78 4 82 0 0 0 0 2 103 0 105 190
Total 3 0 9 12 0 221 20 241 0 0 0 0 26 291 0 317 570
07:00 0 0 2 2 0 48 8 56 0 0 0 0 12 90 0 102 160
07:15 0 0 5 5 0 45 16 61 0 0 0 0 25 89 0 114 180
07:30 1 0 9 10 0 75 17 92 0 0 0 0 8 80 0 88 190
07:45 0 0 7 7 0 88 3 91 0 0 0 0 0 114 0 114 212
Total 1 0 23 24 0 256 44 300 0 0 0 0 45 373 0 418 742
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 101 162
08:15 0 0 1 1 0 58 3 61 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 79 141
08:30 1 0 1 2 0 61 1 62 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 81 145
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 60 1 61 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 65 126
Total 1 0 2 3 0 240 5 245 0 0 0 0 0 326 0 326 574
Grand Total 5 0 34 39 0 717 69 786 0 0 0 0 71 990 0 1061 1886
Apprch % 12.8 0 87.2 0 91.2 8.8 0 0 0 6.7 93.3 0
Total % 0.3 0 1.8 2.1 0 38 3.7 41.7 0 0 0 0 3.8 52.5 0 56.3
Valero Refinery Entrance
Southbound
Park Road
Westbound Northbound
Park Road
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15
07:15 0 0 5 5 0 45 16 61 0 0 0 0 25 89 0 114 180
07:30 1 0 9 10 0 75 17 92 0 0 0 0 8 80 0 88 190
07:45 0 0 7 7 0 88 3 91 0 0 0 0 0 114 0 114 212
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 101 162
Total Volume 1 0 21 22 0 269 36 305 0 0 0 0 33 384 0 417 744
% App. Total 4.5 0 95.5 0 88.2 11.8 0 0 0 7.9 92.1 0
PHF .250 .000 .583 .550 .000 .764 .529 .829 .000 .000 .000 .000 .330 .842 .000 .914 .877
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-005 Valero Refinery-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 2
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Valero Refinery Entrance
Park
Road P
ark R
oad
Right21
Thru0
Left1
InOut Total69 22 91
Rig
ht
36
Thru
269
Left0
Out
Tota
lIn
385
305
690
Left0
Thru0
Right0
Out TotalIn0 0 0
Left33
Thru
384
Rig
ht0
Tota
lO
ut
In290
417
707
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 Unshifted
Peak Hour Data
North
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-005 Valero Refinery-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Groups Printed- Bank 1
Valero Refinery Entrance
Southbound
Park Road
Westbound Northbound
Park Road
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
06:00 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 23
06:15 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 26
06:30 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 21
06:45 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 16
Total 0 0 0 0 0 54 1 55 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 31 86
07:00 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 16 30
07:15 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 11
07:30 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 13
07:45 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 26
Total 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 33 80
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 19
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 16
08:30 0 0 0 0 0 17 1 18 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 32
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 31
Total 0 0 0 0 0 63 1 64 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 34 98
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 164 2 166 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 98 264
Apprch % 0 0 0 0 98.8 1.2 0 0 0 0 100 0
Total % 0 0 0 0 0 62.1 0.8 62.9 0 0 0 0 0 37.1 0 37.1
Valero Refinery Entrance
Southbound
Park Road
Westbound Northbound
Park Road
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00
08:00 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 19
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 16
08:30 0 0 0 0 0 17 1 18 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 32
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 31
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 63 1 64 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 34 98
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 98.4 1.6 0 0 0 0 100 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .685 .250 .696 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .607 .000 .607 .766
All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700
File Name : 13-7020-005 Valero Refinery-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 2
City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab
Valero Refinery Entrance
Park
Road P
ark R
oad
Right0
Thru0
Left0
InOut Total1 0 1
Rig
ht1
Thru6
3
Left0
Out
Tota
lIn
34
64
98
Left0
Thru0
Right0
Out TotalIn0 0 0
Left0
T
hru3
4
Rig
ht0
Tota
lO
ut
In63
34
97
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 Bank 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionLeft or Right
Track?Moving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionMoving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
1 10:43:30 10:44:20 2 NB Right No 0:00:50 1 10:40:54 10:41:10 2 NB No 0:00:162 10:53:20 10:54:45 5 NB Right No 0:01:25 2 14:24:26 14:25:09 9 SB No 0:00:433 10:55:46 10:57:16 5 SB Left No 0:01:30 3 18:49:50 18:50:35 9 NB No 0:00:454 11:48:34 11:50:23 11 SB Left No 0:01:49 4 19:15:51 19:16:31 9 SB No 0:00:405 11:54:01 11:56:02 11 NB Right No 0:02:016 12:15:31 12:16:25 2 SB Right No 0:00:547 12:17:51 12:18:44 2 NB Left No 0:00:538 12:29:48 12:31:41 7 SB Left No 0:01:539 12:32:37 12:34:05 7 NB Right No 0:01:2810 13:10:10 13:12:16 7 SB Right No 0:02:0611 13:14:00 13:16:40 7 NB Left No 0:02:4012 13:43:23 13:44:30 2 SB Left No 0:01:0713 13:46:11 13:47:05 2 NB Right No 0:00:5414 14:20:28 14:25:12 9 SB Right No 0:04:4415 18:51:44 18:53:46 9 NB Left No 0:02:0216 19:08:07 19:08:48 2 SB Left No 0:00:4117 19:09:17 19:10:10 2 NB Right No 0:00:5318 19:15:00 19:16:35 9 SB Right No 0:01:35
Park Road Crossing Iron Workers Union Driveway Crossing
13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudyMonday, April 15, 2013
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionLeft or Right
Track?Moving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionMoving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
1 13:14:15 13:26:06 16 NB Right No 0:11:51 1 13:05:10 13:22:48 16 NB No 0:17:382 17:20:01 17:21:30 2 SB to NB Right to Left Yes 0:01:29 2 17:37:38 17:38:18 10 SB No 0:00:403 17:37:07 17:38:20 10 SB Left No 0:01:13 3 18:11:30 18:12:08 10 NB No 0:00:384 18:12:31 18:13:57 10 NB Left No 0:01:26 4 18:36:35 18:38:32 5 SB to NB Yes 0:01:575 18:22:18 18:24:19 3 SB to NB Left to Right Yes 0:02:01 5 18:48:21 18:50:52 35 SB No 0:02:316 18:32:09 18:40:05 18 SB to NB Right Yes 0:07:567 18:47:35 18:50:59 35 SB Right No 0:03:24
Park Road Crossing Iron Workers Union Driveway Crossing
13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudyTuesday, April 16, 2013
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionLeft or Right
Track?Moving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionMoving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
1 13:51:08 14:07:25 31 NB to SB Right Yes 0:16:17 1 13:48:48 14:13:38 43 NB Yes 0:24:502 14:09:55 14:18:35 31 NB Right No 0:08:40 2 17:36:02 17:36:42 9 SB No 0:00:403 16:51:33 16:53:17 4 SB Right No 0:01:44 3 18:14:19 18:14:57 9 NB No 0:00:384 16:54:06 16:55:26 4 NB Left No 0:01:20 4 18:36:15 18:37:41 20 SB No 0:01:265 17:34:04 17:35:20 9 SB Left No 0:01:166 18:14:07 18:15:25 9 NB Left No 0:01:187 18:25:07 18:26:06 2 SB Left No 0:00:598 18:26:25 18:27:24 2 NB Right No 0:00:599 18:34:10 18:36:18 20 SB Right No 0:02:08
Park Road Crossing Iron Workers Union Driveway Crossing
13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudyWednesday, April 17, 2013
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionLeft or Right
Track?Moving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionMoving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
1 11:20:15 11:24:30 26 NB Right No 0:04:15 1 6:30:49 6:34:56 26 NB Yes 0:04:072 13:51:10 13:59:32 16+ SB to NB Right Yes 0:08:22 2 11:15:35 11:22:37 26 NB No 0:07:02
3 13:53:54 13:55:30 3+ SB to NB Yes 0:01:364 17:18:39 17:19:20 10 SB No 0:00:41
missing video from 1627 to 2400 5 17:57:36 17:58:11 9 NB No 0:00:356 18:22:04 18:24:14 26 SB No 0:02:10
Park Road Crossing Iron Workers Union Driveway Crossing
13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudyThursday, April 18, 2013
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionLeft or Right
Track?Moving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionMoving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
1 9:29:07 9:30:37 2 NB Right No 0:01:30 1 9:27:51 9:28:06 2 NB No 0:00:152 10:19:03 10:21:08 2 SB to NB Right to Left Yes 0:02:05 2 10:43:33 10:44:16 10 SB No 0:00:433 10:43:04 10:43:44 10 SB Left No 0:00:40 3 12:17:56 12:20:22 24 NB No 0:02:264 12:19:38 12:27:55 24 NB Right to Left Yes 0:08:17 4 14:15:06 14:16:57 25 SB No 0:01:515 12:42:57 12:43:52 2 SB Left No 0:00:556 12:44:25 12:45:23 2 NB Right No 0:00:587 12:48:29 12:52:10 9+ SB to NB Right Yes 0:03:418 14:00:14 14:01:38 3+ SB to NB Right Yes 0:01:249 14:10:07 14:16:52 25 SB Right No 0:06:45
missing video from 0000 to 0603
Park Road Crossing Iron Workers Union Driveway Crossing
13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudyFriday, April 19, 2013
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionLeft or Right
Track?Moving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionMoving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
1 12:54:10 13:00:06 16 NB Right No 0:05:56 1 12:52:53 12:54:22 16 NB No 0:01:292 17:10:32 17:11:58 10 SB Left No 0:01:26 2 17:11:38 17:12:17 10 SB No 0:00:393 17:51:43 17:52:58 9 NB Left No 0:01:15 3 17:50:37 17:51:10 9 NB No 0:00:334 18:03:01 18:03:59 2 SB Left No 0:00:58 4 18:03:51 18:04:06 2 SB No 0:00:15
Park Road Crossing Iron Workers Union Driveway Crossing
13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudySaturday, April 20, 2013
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionLeft or Right
Track?Moving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionMoving Back and Forth?
Crossing Duration
1 12:17:58 12:19:52 18 NB Right No 0:01:54 1 12:16:05 12:19:26 18 NB No 0:03:212 13:36:26 13:37:20 2 SB Right No 0:00:54 2 14:06:44 14:07:15 9 SB No 0:00:313 13:38:02 13:38:56 2 NB Left No 0:00:54 3 14:54:32 14:55:05 9 NB No 0:00:334 14:04:05 14:05:32 9 SB Left No 0:01:27 4 15:08:55 15:09:08 2 SB No 0:00:135 14:54:03 14:55:45 9 NB Right No 0:01:42 5 17:34:40 17:34:53 2 NB No 0:00:136 15:06:29 15:07:28 2 SB Left No 0:00:59 6 18:02:28 18:02:40 2 SB No 0:00:127 17:35:25 17:37:05 2 NB Right No 0:01:408 17:55:24 17:57:36 6+ SB to NB Right Yes 0:02:129 18:00:02 18:00:55 2 SB Right No 0:00:53
Park Road Crossing Iron Workers Union Driveway Crossing
13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudySunday, April 21, 2013
UPPR DATA ‐ Delivery Schedule EstimatePark Road Rail Crossing ‐‐‐ Estimate only based on partial load data
Outbound Loads and Empties Inbound Loads and EmptiesDate Tankcars Footage Boxcar Footage Total Cars Total Footage Date Tankcars Footage Boxcar Footage Total Cars Total Footage
1/4/2013 16 960 1 50 17 1010 1/4/2013 7 420 0 0 7 4201/5/2013 23 1380 9 450 32 1830 1/5/2013 11 660 0 0 11 6601/6/2013 16 960 1 50 17 1010 1/6/2013 16 960 1 50 17 10101/7/2013 20 1200 6 300 26 1500 1/7/2013 34 2040 9 450 43 24901/8/2013 11 660 11 550 22 1210 1/8/2013 0 0 0 0 0 01/9/2013 23 1380 5 250 28 1630 1/9/2013 20 1200 6 300 26 1500
1/10/2013 20 1200 8 400 28 1600 1/10/2013 15 900 11 550 26 14501/11/2013 13 780 0 0 13 780 1/11/2013 16 960 5 250 21 12101/12/2013 38 2280 7 350 45 2630 1/12/2013 25 1500 8 400 33 19001/13/2013 11 660 0 11 660 1/13/2013 9 540 0 0 9 5401/14/2013 12 720 0 12 720 1/14/2013 34 2040 7 350 41 2390
Assumptions:60' tankcars50' boxcarsEmpty movements are estimates only; based on cars on spot average 2 days7 cars per day added to Valero tank cars inbound and outbound (coke turn)
Aggregate estimated numbersN:\PROJECTS\_WC13\WC13‐3005_Benicia_Refinery\Data Collection\Counts\Video_Train_Crossings\UPPR_Data.xlsx
5/14/2013
UPPR DATA ‐ Delivery Schedule Estimate
Benicia Inbound Loads (Auto excluded) Outbound Empties - Not actual data - estimated assuming 2 days loaded spot to empty outbound move
Waybill Date
Sys Dest Circ7
CONSIGNEE UnitsMgrl Car Kind
Cmdy DescDate Units Car Type Load/Empty
1/6/2013 RV385 CROWN IMPORTS 1 BOX50 BEER 1/4/2013 1 BOXPL050 Empty
1/6/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 9 TANK LPG 1/4/2013 9 TANK Empty
1/7/2013 RV385 CROWN IMPORTS 9 BOX50 BEER 1/5/2013 9 BOXPL050 Empty
1/7/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 16 TANK LPG 1/5/2013 16 TANK Empty
1/9/2013 RV385 CROWN IMPORTS 6 BOX50 BEER 1/7/2013 6 BOXPL050 Empty
1/9/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 9 TANK LPG 1/7/2013 9 TANK Empty
1/10/2013 RV385 CROWN IMPORTS 11 BOX50 BEER 1/8/2013 11 BOXPL050 Empty
1/10/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 4 TANK LPG 1/8/2013 4 TANK Empty
1/11/2013 RV385 CROWN IMPORTS 5 BOX50 BEER 1/9/2013 5 BOXPL050 Empty
1/11/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 5 TANK LPG 1/9/2013 5 TANK Empty
1/12/2013 RV385 CROWN IMPORTS 8 BOX50 BEER 1/10/2013 8 BOXPL050 Empty
1/12/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 13 TANK LPG 1/10/2013 13 TANK Empty
1/13/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 2 TANK LPG 1/11/2013 2 TANK Empty
1/14/2013 RV385 CROWN IMPORTS 7 BOX50 BEER 1/12/2013 7 BOXPL050 Empty
1/14/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 27 TANK LPG 1/12/2013 27 TANK Empty
Benicia Outbound Loads (Auto excluded) Inbound Empties - Not actual data - estimated assuming on 2 days empty spot to loaded outbound move
Waybill Date
Sys Orig Circ7
Shpr Name UnitsMgrl Car Kind
Cmdy DescDate Units Car Type Load/Empty
1/7/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 4 TANK LPG 1/5/2013 4 Tank Empty
1/9/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 11 TANK LPG 1/7/2013 11 Tank Empty
1/11/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 4 TANK LPG 1/9/2013 4 Tank Empty
1/12/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 4 TANK LPG 1/10/2013 4 Tank Empty
1/13/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 4 TANK LPG 1/11/2013 4 Tank Empty
1/14/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 4 TANK LPG 1/12/2013 5 Tank Empty
1/14/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 1 TANK CAUS SODA LIQ
Add 7 loads, 7 empties pet coke tank cars daily
N:\PROJECTS\_WC13\WC13‐3005_Benicia_Refinery\Data Collection\Counts\Video_Train_Crossings\UPPR_Data.xlsx5/14/2013
1. Reporting Railroad
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)
HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORTOMB Approval No. 2130-0500
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A
RR Accident/Incident No.
5. Date of Accident/Incident
3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance
2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.
4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.
6. Time of Accident/Incident
SP
SP
A0755
A0755
751527E 04/24/95 03:56 PM
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code
CA06SOLANOBENICIA
11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.BENICIA PARK STREET Public Private
Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved
Code Code13. TypeC. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify)B
17. Equipment
14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)
1. Train2. Train
(units pulling)(units pushing)
1. North 2. South 3. East
3. Train
4. Car(s)5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)(standing)
6. Light loco(s)
8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
6
30Code
2
15. Direction (geographical)
4. West
18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1
16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing
2. Stopped on Crossing
3. Moving over crossing
4. Trapped
Code
319. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user
2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
120a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved
in the impact transporting hazardous materials?
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4
Code
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any
21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 78
22. Visibility (single entry)
1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2
23. Weather (single entry) Code
11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow
24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)
1. Freight train
2. Passenger train
3. Commuter train
4. Work train
5. Single car
6. Cut of cars
7. Yard/Switching
9. Main./inspect. car
8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.
Consist
Code
8
25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved
1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2
26. Track Number or Name
0700
27. FRA Track
Class
1
28. Number of
Locomotive
1
29. Number of
Cars
0
30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East
31. Time Table Direction
4. West
Code
4
32. Type of
Warning
1. Gates
2. Cantilever FLS
3. Standard FLS
4. Wig wags
5. Hwy. traffic signals
6. Audible
7. Crossbucks
9. Watchman
8. Stop signsCrossing
10. Flagged by crew
11. Other
12. None
(specify)
Code(s)
33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
07
1. Yes
2. No
3. Unknown
35. Location of Warning
21
1. Both Sides
2. Side of Vehicle Approach
3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street
2
Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code
38. Driver's
Age
39. Driver's Code
1. Male
2. Female
40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown2
Code
1. Drove around or thru the gate
3. Did not stop
2. Stopped and then proceeded
4. Stopped on crossing
5. Other (specify)3
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction)
1
Code
1. Permanent Structure2. Standing railroad equipment
3. Passing Train4. Topography
5. Vegetation6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed
7. Other (specify)
1a.
Name Of
1b.
Alphabetic Code
Abbr.
Casualties to:
46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users
49. Railroad Employees
52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured44. Driver was
1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3
47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $1,0000
0
0
0
0
0
50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)
1. Yes 2. No
45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1
Code
48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1
51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed
1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block
54. Narrative Description
55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCLB. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
1. Reporting Railroad
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)
HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORTOMB Approval No. 2130-0500
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A
RR Accident/Incident No.
5. Date of Accident/Incident
3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance
2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.
4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.
6. Time of Accident/Incident
SP
SP
A0055
A0055
751527E 01/07/95 06:30 PM
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code
CA06SOLANOBAHIA
11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.BENICIA PARK RD. Public Private
Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved
Code Code13. TypeC. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify)B
17. Equipment
14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)
1. Train2. Train
(units pulling)(units pushing)
1. North 2. South 3. East
3. Train
4. Car(s)5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)(standing)
6. Light loco(s)
8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
1
5Code
4
15. Direction (geographical)
4. West
18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1
16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing
2. Stopped on Crossing
3. Moving over crossing
4. Trapped
Code
319. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user
2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
120a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved
in the impact transporting hazardous materials?
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4
Code
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any
21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 50
22. Visibility (single entry)
1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4
23. Weather (single entry) Code
31. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow
24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)
1. Freight train
2. Passenger train
3. Commuter train
4. Work train
5. Single car
6. Cut of cars
7. Yard/Switching
9. Main./inspect. car
8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.
Consist
Code
7
25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved
1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
4
26. Track Number or Name
0700
27. FRA Track
Class
1
28. Number of
Locomotive
1
29. Number of
Cars
5
30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East
31. Time Table Direction
4. West
Code
4
32. Type of
Warning
1. Gates
2. Cantilever FLS
3. Standard FLS
4. Wig wags
5. Hwy. traffic signals
6. Audible
7. Crossbucks
9. Watchman
8. Stop signsCrossing
10. Flagged by crew
11. Other
12. None
(specify)
Code(s)
33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
07
1. Yes
2. No
3. Unknown
35. Location of Warning
21
1. Both Sides
2. Side of Vehicle Approach
3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street
2
Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code
38. Driver's
Age
39. Driver's Code
1. Male
2. Female
40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown2
Code
1. Drove around or thru the gate
3. Did not stop
2. Stopped and then proceeded
4. Stopped on crossing
5. Other (specify)3
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction)
8
Code
1. Permanent Structure2. Standing railroad equipment
3. Passing Train4. Topography
5. Vegetation6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed
7. Other (specify)
1a.
Name Of
1b.
Alphabetic Code
Abbr.
Casualties to:
46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users
49. Railroad Employees
52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured44. Driver was
1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3
47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $1,0000
0
0
0
0
0
50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)
1. Yes 2. No
45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1
Code
48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1
51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed
1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block
54. Narrative Description
55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCLB. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
1. Reporting Railroad
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)
HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORTOMB Approval No. 2130-0500
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A
RR Accident/Incident No.
5. Date of Accident/Incident
3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance
2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.
4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.
6. Time of Accident/Incident
SP
SP
A2523
A2523
751527E 11/29/93 06:10 PM
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code
CA06SOLANOBENICIA
11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.BENICIA PARK STREET Public Private
Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved
Code Code13. TypeC. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify)A
17. Equipment
14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)
1. Train2. Train
(units pulling)(units pushing)
1. North 2. South 3. East
3. Train
4. Car(s)5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)(standing)
6. Light loco(s)
8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
2
10Code
3
15. Direction (geographical)
4. West
18. Position of Car Unit in Train
15
16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing
2. Stopped on Crossing
3. Moving over crossing
4. Trapped
Code
319. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user
2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
220a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved
in the impact transporting hazardous materials?
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
2
Code
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any
21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 65
22. Visibility (single entry)
1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4
23. Weather (single entry) Code
21. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow
24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)
1. Freight train
2. Passenger train
3. Commuter train
4. Work train
5. Single car
6. Cut of cars
7. Yard/Switching
9. Main./inspect. car
8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.
Consist
Code
7
25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved
1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2
26. Track Number or Name
0700 LEWAD
27. FRA Track
Class
1
28. Number of
Locomotive
1
29. Number of
Cars
15
30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
2 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East
31. Time Table Direction
4. West
Code
3
32. Type of
Warning
1. Gates
2. Cantilever FLS
3. Standard FLS
4. Wig wags
5. Hwy. traffic signals
6. Audible
7. Crossbucks
9. Watchman
8. Stop signsCrossing
10. Flagged by crew
11. Other
12. None
(specify)
Code(s)
33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
07 10
1. Yes
2. No
3. Unknown
35. Location of Warning
21
1. Both Sides
2. Side of Vehicle Approach
3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street
2
Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code
38. Driver's
Age
39. Driver's Code
1. Male
2. Female
40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown2
Code
1. Drove around or thru the gate
3. Did not stop
2. Stopped and then proceeded
4. Stopped on crossing
5. Other (specify)3
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction)
8
Code
1. Permanent Structure2. Standing railroad equipment
3. Passing Train4. Topography
5. Vegetation6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed
7. Other (specify)
1a.
Name Of
1b.
Alphabetic Code
Abbr.
Casualties to:
46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users
49. Railroad Employees
52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured44. Driver was
1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3
47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $3,0000
0
0
0
0
0
50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)
1. Yes 2. No
45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1
Code
48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 3
51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed
1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block
54. Narrative Description
55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCLB. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
1. Reporting Railroad
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)
HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORTOMB Approval No. 2130-0500
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A
RR Accident/Incident No.
5. Date of Accident/Incident
3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance
2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.
4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.
6. Time of Accident/Incident
SP
SP
A3672
A3672
751527E 10/23/92 06:10 PM
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code
CA06SOLANOBENICIA
11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.BENICIA PARK ST Public Private
Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved
Code Code13. TypeC. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify)C
17. Equipment
14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)
1. Train2. Train
(units pulling)(units pushing)
1. North 2. South 3. East
3. Train
4. Car(s)5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)(standing)
6. Light loco(s)
8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
6
3Code
1
15. Direction (geographical)
4. West
18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1
16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing
2. Stopped on Crossing
3. Moving over crossing
4. Trapped
Code
319. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user
2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
120a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved
in the impact transporting hazardous materials?
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4
Code
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any
21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 70
22. Visibility (single entry)
1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4
23. Weather (single entry) Code
11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow
24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)
1. Freight train
2. Passenger train
3. Commuter train
4. Work train
5. Single car
6. Cut of cars
7. Yard/Switching
9. Main./inspect. car
8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.
Consist
Code
8
25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved
1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2
26. Track Number or Name
728 LD
27. FRA Track
Class
1
28. Number of
Locomotive
1
29. Number of
Cars
0
30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East
31. Time Table Direction
4. West
Code
1
32. Type of
Warning
1. Gates
2. Cantilever FLS
3. Standard FLS
4. Wig wags
5. Hwy. traffic signals
6. Audible
7. Crossbucks
9. Watchman
8. Stop signsCrossing
10. Flagged by crew
11. Other
12. None
(specify)
Code(s)
33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
07
1. Yes
2. No
3. Unknown
35. Location of Warning
21
1. Both Sides
2. Side of Vehicle Approach
3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street
2
Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code
38. Driver's
Age
39. Driver's Code
1. Male
2. Female
40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown2
Code
1. Drove around or thru the gate
3. Did not stop
2. Stopped and then proceeded
4. Stopped on crossing
5. Other (specify)3
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction)
8
Code
1. Permanent Structure2. Standing railroad equipment
3. Passing Train4. Topography
5. Vegetation6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed
7. Other (specify)
1a.
Name Of
1b.
Alphabetic Code
Abbr.
Casualties to:
46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users
49. Railroad Employees
52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured44. Driver was
1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3
47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $5000
0
0
0
1
0
50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)
1. Yes 2. No
45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1
Code
48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1
51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed
1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block
54. Narrative Description
55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCLB. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
1. Reporting Railroad
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)
HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORTOMB Approval No. 2130-0500
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A
RR Accident/Incident No.
5. Date of Accident/Incident
3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance
2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.
4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.
6. Time of Accident/Incident
SP
SP
A1111
A1111
751527E 04/16/91 09:15 AM
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code
CA06SOLANOARMY POINT
11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.BENICA PARK ST Public Private
Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved
Code Code13. TypeC. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify)C
17. Equipment
14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)
1. Train2. Train
(units pulling)(units pushing)
1. North 2. South 3. East
3. Train
4. Car(s)5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)(standing)
6. Light loco(s)
8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
1
7Code
4
15. Direction (geographical)
4. West
18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1
16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing
2. Stopped on Crossing
3. Moving over crossing
4. Trapped
Code
319. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user
2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
120a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved
in the impact transporting hazardous materials?
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4
Code
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any
21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 75
22. Visibility (single entry)
1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2
23. Weather (single entry) Code
11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow
24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)
1. Freight train
2. Passenger train
3. Commuter train
4. Work train
5. Single car
6. Cut of cars
7. Yard/Switching
9. Main./inspect. car
8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.
Consist
Code
7
25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved
1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2
26. Track Number or Name
0712
27. FRA Track
Class
1
28. Number of
Locomotive
1
29. Number of
Cars
5
30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
10 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East
31. Time Table Direction
4. West
Code
4
32. Type of
Warning
1. Gates
2. Cantilever FLS
3. Standard FLS
4. Wig wags
5. Hwy. traffic signals
6. Audible
7. Crossbucks
9. Watchman
8. Stop signsCrossing
10. Flagged by crew
11. Other
12. None
(specify)
Code(s)
33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
07
1. Yes
2. No
3. Unknown
35. Location of Warning
21
1. Both Sides
2. Side of Vehicle Approach
3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street
2
Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code
38. Driver's
Age
39. Driver's Code
1. Male
2. Female
40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown2
Code
1. Drove around or thru the gate
3. Did not stop
2. Stopped and then proceeded
4. Stopped on crossing
5. Other (specify)3
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction)
8
Code
1. Permanent Structure2. Standing railroad equipment
3. Passing Train4. Topography
5. Vegetation6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed
7. Other (specify)
1a.
Name Of
1b.
Alphabetic Code
Abbr.
Casualties to:
46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users
49. Railroad Employees
52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured44. Driver was
1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3
47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $1,0000
0
0
0
0
0
50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)
1. Yes 2. No
45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1
Code
48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1
51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed
1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block
54. Narrative Description
55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCLB. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
1. Reporting Railroad
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)
HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORTOMB Approval No. 2130-0500
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A
RR Accident/Incident No.
5. Date of Accident/Incident
3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance
2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.
4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.
6. Time of Accident/Incident
SP
SP
E1300
E1300
751527E 03/06/90 12:05 PM
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code
CA06SOLANOARMY POINT
11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.BENICIA PARK STREET Public Private
Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved
Code Code13. TypeC. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify)A
17. Equipment
14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)
1. Train2. Train
(units pulling)(units pushing)
1. North 2. South 3. East
3. Train
4. Car(s)5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)(standing)
6. Light loco(s)
8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
6
7Code
4
15. Direction (geographical)
4. West
18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1
16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing
2. Stopped on Crossing
3. Moving over crossing
4. Trapped
Code
319. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user
2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
120a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved
in the impact transporting hazardous materials?
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4
Code
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any
21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 70
22. Visibility (single entry)
1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2
23. Weather (single entry) Code
11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow
24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)
1. Freight train
2. Passenger train
3. Commuter train
4. Work train
5. Single car
6. Cut of cars
7. Yard/Switching
9. Main./inspect. car
8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.
Consist
Code
8
25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved
1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2
26. Track Number or Name
0710
27. FRA Track
Class
1
28. Number of
Locomotive
1
29. Number of
Cars
0
30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
7 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East
31. Time Table Direction
4. West
Code
4
32. Type of
Warning
1. Gates
2. Cantilever FLS
3. Standard FLS
4. Wig wags
5. Hwy. traffic signals
6. Audible
7. Crossbucks
9. Watchman
8. Stop signsCrossing
10. Flagged by crew
11. Other
12. None
(specify)
Code(s)
33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
07
1. Yes
2. No
3. Unknown
35. Location of Warning
21
1. Both Sides
2. Side of Vehicle Approach
3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street
2
Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code
38. Driver's
Age
39. Driver's Code
1. Male
2. Female
40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown2
Code
1. Drove around or thru the gate
3. Did not stop
2. Stopped and then proceeded
4. Stopped on crossing
5. Other (specify)4
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction)
8
Code
1. Permanent Structure2. Standing railroad equipment
3. Passing Train4. Topography
5. Vegetation6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed
7. Other (specify)
1a.
Name Of
1b.
Alphabetic Code
Abbr.
Casualties to:
46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users
49. Railroad Employees
52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured44. Driver was
1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3
47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $5000
0
0
0
0
0
50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)
1. Yes 2. No
45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1
Code
48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1
51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed
1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block
54. Narrative Description
55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCLB. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
1. Reporting Railroad
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)
HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORTOMB Approval No. 2130-0500
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A
RR Accident/Incident No.
5. Date of Accident/Incident
3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance
2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.
4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.
6. Time of Accident/Incident
SP
SP
50329
50329
751527E 01/25/89 12:12 PM
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]
7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code
CA06SOLANOARMY POINT
11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.BENICIA PARK Public Private
Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved
Code Code13. TypeC. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify)A
17. Equipment
14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)
1. Train2. Train
(units pulling)(units pushing)
1. North 2. South 3. East
3. Train
4. Car(s)5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)(standing)
6. Light loco(s)
8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
6
5Code
3
15. Direction (geographical)
4. West
18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1
16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing
2. Stopped on Crossing
3. Moving over crossing
4. Trapped
Code
319. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user
2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
120a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved
in the impact transporting hazardous materials?
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4
Code
1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any
21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 55
22. Visibility (single entry)
1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2
23. Weather (single entry) Code
11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow
24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)
1. Freight train
2. Passenger train
3. Commuter train
4. Work train
5. Single car
6. Cut of cars
7. Yard/Switching
9. Main./inspect. car
8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.
Consist
Code
8
25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved
1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2
26. Track Number or Name
700 LEAD
27. FRA Track
Class
1
28. Number of
Locomotive
1
29. Number of
Cars
0
30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East
31. Time Table Direction
4. West
Code
3
32. Type of
Warning
1. Gates
2. Cantilever FLS
3. Standard FLS
4. Wig wags
5. Hwy. traffic signals
6. Audible
7. Crossbucks
9. Watchman
8. Stop signsCrossing
10. Flagged by crew
11. Other
12. None
(specify)
Code(s)
33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
07
1. Yes
2. No
3. Unknown
35. Location of Warning
21
1. Both Sides
2. Side of Vehicle Approach
3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street
2
Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code
38. Driver's
Age
39. Driver's Code
1. Male
2. Female
40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown2
Code
1. Drove around or thru the gate
3. Did not stop
2. Stopped and then proceeded
4. Stopped on crossing
5. Other (specify)3
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle
1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction)
8
Code
1. Permanent Structure2. Standing railroad equipment
3. Passing Train4. Topography
5. Vegetation6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed
7. Other (specify)
1a.
Name Of
1b.
Alphabetic Code
Abbr.
Casualties to:
46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users
49. Railroad Employees
52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured44. Driver was
1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3
47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $1,5000
0
0
0
0
0
50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)
1. Yes 2. No
45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1
Code
48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1
51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed
1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block
54. Narrative Description
55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCLB. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
APPENNDIX B: INNTERSECT
TION ANAALYSIS WWORKSHEEETS
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Existing AM
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 1 Bayshore Road/Park Road All-way Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 28 29 103.9% 2.9 0.5 A
Through 26 29 110.0% 5.0 1.5 A
Right Turn 376 370 98.3% 7.1 0.5 A
Subtotal 430 427 99.3% 6.7 0.5 A
Left Turn 22 19 87.3% 5.6 0.8 A
Through 12 10 83.3% 7.6 2.0 A
Right Turn 4 4 90.0% 2.7 2.4 A
Subtotal 38 33 86.3% 5.9 0.6 A
Left Turn 4 4 95.0% 2.8 2.5 A
Through 19 18 95.8% 7.3 0.7 A
Right Turn 12 10 80.8% 6.4 5.1 A
Subtotal 35 32 90.6% 6.4 1.5 A
Left Turn 190 183 96.4% 7.1 0.9 A
Through 40 44 109.5% 6.1 1.0 A
Right Turn 63 61 96.5% 4.5 0.7 A
Subtotal 293 288 98.2% 6.5 0.5 A
Total 796 779 97.9% 6.6 0.4 A
6.6
Intersection 2 Bayshore Road/I-680 SB On-Ramp Uncontrolled
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 22 22 97.7% 1.8 1.3 A
Through 430 427 99.3% 2.0 0.2 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 452 449 99.2% 2.0 0.2 A
Left Turn
Through 31 30 95.8% 0.6 0.2 A
Right Turn 183 173 94.5% 0.9 0.2 A
Subtotal 214 203 94.7% 0.8 0.2 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 666 651 97.8% 1.6 0.2 A
2.0
NB
SB
EB
WB
NB
SB
EB
WB
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Existing AM
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 3 Bayshore Road/I-680 NB Off-Ramp Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through 35 33 94.0% 0.5 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 35 33 94.0% 0.5 0.1 A
Left Turn
Through 31 30 95.5% 0.1 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 31 30 95.5% 0.1 0.1 A
Left Turn 417 416 99.7% 36.8 10.7 E
Through
Right Turn 46 45 98.3% 29.5 10.1 D
Subtotal 463 461 99.5% 36.1 10.5 E
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 529 523 98.9% 31.8 9.0 D
36.8
Intersection 4 Bay Vista Court/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn 4 4 102.5% 3.6 0.3 A
Subtotal 4 4 102.5% 3.6 0.3 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 31 28 89.4% 0.2 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 31 28 89.4% 0.2 0.1 A
Left Turn 21 23 107.1% 0.4 0.3 A
Through 51 54 105.5% 0.1 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 72 76 106.0% 0.2 0.1 A
Total 107 108 101.0% 0.3 0.1 A
3.6
WB
EB
WB
NB
NB
EB
SB
SB
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Existing AM
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 5 Valero Refinery Entrance/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn 1 1 50.0% 1.3 2.8 A
Through
Right Turn 21 21 98.1% 6.8 2.2 A
Subtotal 22 21 95.9% 6.5 2.0 A
Left Turn 33 34 102.7% 1.4 1.0 A
Through 384 373 97.1% 0.1 0.0 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 417 407 97.6% 0.2 0.1 A
Left Turn
Through 272 267 98.1% 0.5 0.1 A
Right Turn 36 37 101.9% 0.8 0.2 A
Subtotal 308 304 98.5% 0.5 0.2 A
Total 747 731 97.9% 0.5 0.1 A
6.8
SB
EB
WB
NB
Volume (vph)
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Existing Plus Project
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 1 Bayshore Road/Park Road All-way Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 28 27 96.4% 4.4 2.8 A
Through 26 26 100.4% 31.5 49.0 D
Right Turn 376 362 96.2% 95.3 8.1 F
Subtotal 430 415 96.5% 83.9 9.1 F
Left Turn 22 18 83.2% 113.6 53.4 F
Through 12 10 85.8% 49.3 93.3 E
Right Turn 4 4 100.0% 23.9 70.4 C
Subtotal 38 33 85.8% 85.4 55.3 F
Left Turn 4 4 107.5% 94.2 143.8 F
Through 19 18 96.3% 165.9 96.7 F
Right Turn 12 10 80.0% 31.9 46.5 D
Subtotal 35 32 92.0% 110.9 61.1 F
Left Turn 190 187 98.4% 125.7 11.7 F
Through 40 43 108.3% 81.7 54.7 F
Right Turn 63 63 99.2% 124.8 25.8 F
Subtotal 293 293 99.9% 119.0 9.9 F
Total 796 773 97.0% 101.8 7.4 F
101.8
Intersection 2 Bayshore Road/I-680 SB On-Ramp Uncontrolled
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 22 21 97.3% 3.2 2.7 A
Through 430 415 96.5% 70.3 10.2 F
Right Turn
Subtotal 452 437 96.6% 66.7 8.9 F
Left Turn
Through 31 30 97.7% 1.4 0.3 A
Right Turn 183 177 96.5% 1.6 0.2 A
Subtotal 214 207 96.7% 1.6 0.2 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 666 643 96.6% 39.1 5.0 E
70.3
NB
SB
EB
WB
NB
SB
EB
WB
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Existing Plus Project
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 3 Bayshore Road/I-680 NB Off-Ramp Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through 35 33 93.7% 0.7 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 35 33 93.7% 0.7 0.1 A
Left Turn
Through 31 30 97.7% 0.2 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 31 30 97.7% 0.2 0.1 A
Left Turn 417 404 96.9% 302.0 25.6 F
Through
Right Turn 46 44 96.5% 302.0 31.2 F
Subtotal 463 449 96.9% 301.7 25.8 F
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 529 512 96.7% 266.6 22.7 F
302.0
Intersection 4 Bay Vista Court/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn 4 4 102.5% 3.9 1.0 A
Subtotal 4 4 102.5% 3.9 1.0 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 31 28 90.6% 0.2 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 31 28 90.6% 0.2 0.1 A
Left Turn 21 22 102.4% 0.4 0.3 A
Through 51 53 103.9% 0.1 0.0 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 72 75 103.5% 0.2 0.1 A
Total 107 107 99.7% 0.4 0.1 A
3.9
WB
EB
WB
NB
NB
EB
SB
SB
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Existing Plus Project
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 5 Valero Refinery Entrance/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn 1 0 20.0%
Through
Right Turn 21 21 98.1% 49.1 42.7 E
Subtotal 22 21 94.5% 46.9 40.7 E
Left Turn 33 33 98.5% 11.1 22.3 B
Through 384 366 95.3% 7.4 2.6 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 417 398 95.5% 7.9 0.6 A
Left Turn
Through 272 272 100.0% 83.4 25.7 F
Right Turn 36 33 91.1% 96.6 51.3 F
Subtotal 308 305 99.0% 83.8 25.8 F
Total 747 724 96.9% 47.3 13.0 E
96.6
SB
EB
WB
NB
Volume (vph)
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Existing Plus Project
Volume and Delay by Movement AM
Intersection 1 Bayshore Road/Park Road All-way Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 17 18 106.5% 28.0 37.8 D
Through 15 15 100.0% 34.2 60.8 D
Right Turn 223 216 97.0% 94.2 5.6 F
Subtotal 255 249 97.8% 83.8 5.6 F
Left Turn 13 12 89.2% 134.6 106.0 F
Through 7 6 91.4% 28.7 56.7 D
Right Turn 2 2 95.0% 1.9 2.0 A
Subtotal 22 20 90.5% 76.9 57.2 F
Left Turn 2 3 155.0% 2.7 2.4 A
Through 11 11 99.1% 112.6 97.6 F
Right Turn 7 6 85.7% 22.3 43.6 C
Subtotal 20 20 100.0% 65.5 61.5 F
Left Turn 114 112 98.4% 139.0 20.7 F
Through 24 22 91.3% 153.7 85.1 F
Right Turn 37 37 98.9% 118.1 84.6 F
Subtotal 175 171 97.5% 138.5 12.7 F
Total 472 460 97.4% 103.2 3.7 F
103.2
Intersection 2 Bayshore Road/I-680 SB On-Ramp Uncontrolled
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 13 13 101.5% 1.6 1.1 A
Through 255 249 97.6% 55.0 7.4 F
Right Turn
Subtotal 268 262 97.8% 52.9 7.5 F
Left Turn
Through 19 18 92.6% 1.0 0.6 A
Right Turn 109 107 98.4% 1.4 0.2 A
Subtotal 128 125 97.6% 1.3 0.2 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 396 387 97.8% 36.3 5.0 E
55.0
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
SB
EB
WB
NB
SB
EB
WB
NB
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Existing Plus Project
Volume and Delay by Movement AM
Intersection 3 Bayshore Road/I-680 NB Off-Ramp Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through 21 20 96.2% 29.7 33.5 D
Right Turn
Subtotal 21 20 96.2% 29.7 33.5 D
Left Turn
Through 19 18 92.6% 0.0 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 19 18 92.6% 0.0 0.1 A
Left Turn 247 242 97.9% 75.4 25.9 F
Through
Right Turn 29 31 106.2% 68.6 48.1 F
Subtotal 276 273 98.8% 74.4 27.1 F
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 316 311 98.3% 67.2 25.0 F
75.4
Intersection 4 Bay Vista Court/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn 2 4 205.0% 3.6 0.2 A
Subtotal 2 4 205.0% 3.6 0.2 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 18 16 88.3% 0.2 0.2 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 18 16 88.3% 0.2 0.2 A
Left Turn 12 12 97.5% 0.3 0.0 A
Through 31 30 98.1% 0.1 0.0 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 43 42 97.9% 0.2 0.0 A
Total 63 62 98.6% 0.4 0.1 A
3.6
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
SB
EB
SB
WB
EB
WB
NB
NB
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Existing Plus Project
Volume and Delay by Movement AM
Intersection 5 Valero Refinery Entrance/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn 1 1 100.0% 1.1 2.3 A
Through
Right Turn 12 11 90.8% 16.9 21.8 C
Subtotal 13 12 91.5% 15.9 20.2 C
Left Turn 19 17 89.5% 1.6 1.2 A
Through 228 222 97.3% 8.9 0.6 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 247 239 96.7% 8.5 0.5 A
Left Turn
Through 163 159 97.8% 22.5 14.8 C
Right Turn 21 21 100.5% 8.0 10.5 A
Subtotal 184 181 98.1% 20.5 12.5 C
Total 444 431 97.1% 13.8 5.8 B
22.5
Volume (vph)
SB
EB
WB
NB
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PM
Volume and Delay by Movement PM
Intersection 1 Bayshore Road/Park Road All-way Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served GEH Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 3 3 113.3% 0.2 2.4 2.0 A
Through 2 1 65.0% 0.5 1.8 2.9 A
Right Turn 34 32 94.7% 0.3 131.2 59.3 F
Subtotal 39 37 94.6% 0.3 103.7 49.3 F
Left Turn 2 4 205.0% 1.2 140.0 162.1 F
Through 1 0 0.0% 1.4
Right Turn
Subtotal 3 4 136.7% 0.6 115.8 137.4 F
Left Turn
Through 2 2 115.0% 0.2 118.6 175.0 F
Right Turn 1 2 170.0% 0.6 0.9 1.2 A
Subtotal 3 4 133.3% 0.5 81.6 114.0 F
Left Turn 18 19 106.1% 0.3 130.7 63.7 F
Through 4 4 100.0% 0.0 88.4 145.5 F
Right Turn 6 6 98.3% 0.0 84.3 119.0 F
Subtotal 28 29 103.6% 0.2 117.2 41.2 F
Total 73 74 101.4% 0.1 113.4 21.1 F
113.4
Intersection 2 Bayshore Road/I-680 SB On-Ramp Uncontrolled
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served GEH Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 2 2 120.0% 0.3 0.1 0.2 A
Through 39 37 94.6% 0.3 0.3 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 41 39 95.9% 0.3 0.3 0.1 A
Left Turn
Through 3 2 80.0% 0.4 0.6 0.9 A
Right Turn 17 18 107.1% 0.3 0.5 0.3 A
Subtotal 20 21 103.0% 0.1 0.5 0.3 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 61 60 98.2% 0.1 0.4 0.1 A
0.6
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
SB
EB
WB
NB
SB
EB
WB
NB
Fehr & Peers 3/27/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PM
Volume and Delay by Movement PM
Intersection 3 Bayshore Road/I-680 NB Off-Ramp Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served GEH Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through 3 4 133.3% 0.5 0.1 0.3 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 3 4 133.3% 0.5 0.1 0.3 A
Left Turn
Through 3 2 80.0% 0.4 0.0 0.0 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 3 2 80.0% 0.4 0.0 0.0 A
Left Turn 38 35 92.9% 0.4 5.6 0.6 A
Through
Right Turn 4 5 132.5% 0.6 4.1 2.1 A
Subtotal 42 41 96.7% 0.2 5.4 0.7 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 48 47 97.9% 0.1 4.6 0.6 A
5.6
Intersection 4 Bay Vista Court/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served GEH Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 3 4 133.3% 0.5 0.1 0.0 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 3 4 133.3% 0.5 0.1 0.0 A
Left Turn 2 3 125.0% 0.3 0.2 0.2 A
Through 5 5 98.0% 0.0 0.1 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 7 7 105.7% 0.1 0.1 0.1 A
Total 10 11 114.0% 0.4 0.1 0.0 A
0.2
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
SB
EB
SB
WB
EB
WB
NB
NB
Fehr & Peers 3/27/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PM
Volume and Delay by Movement PM
Intersection 5 Valero Refinery Entrance/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served GEH Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn 2 4 205.0% 1.2 4.6 1.0 A
Subtotal 2 4 205.0% 1.2 4.6 1.0 A
Left Turn 3 3 96.7% 0.1 0.1 0.1 A
Through 35 36 102.0% 0.1 0.0 0.0 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 38 39 101.6% 0.1 0.0 0.1 A
Left Turn
Through 26 25 95.4% 0.2 0.0 0.0 A
Right Turn 3 3 93.3% 0.1 0.2 0.2 A
Subtotal 29 28 95.2% 0.3 0.1 0.1 A
Total 69 70 101.9% 0.2 0.4 0.1 A
4.6
Volume (vph)
SB
EB
WB
NB
Fehr & Peers 3/27/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Cumulative Base
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 1 Bayshore Road/Park Road All-way Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 40 36 88.8% 3.3 0.5 A
Through 30 27 90.3% 5.3 1.1 A
Right Turn 500 439 87.9% 8.3 0.8 A
Subtotal 570 502 88.1% 7.9 0.7 A
Left Turn 30 28 93.7% 5.7 0.6 A
Through 20 19 94.0% 7.0 0.9 A
Right Turn 10 10 99.0% 4.7 2.2 A
Subtotal 60 57 94.7% 6.0 0.6 A
Left Turn 10 9 91.0% 4.4 2.3 A
Through 20 19 94.5% 6.9 0.9 A
Right Turn 20 17 84.0% 5.9 1.7 A
Subtotal 50 45 89.6% 6.1 0.8 A
Left Turn 250 244 97.8% 7.9 1.1 A
Through 50 49 97.2% 5.6 1.0 A
Right Turn 80 80 99.9% 4.8 2.0 A
Subtotal 380 373 98.1% 7.0 0.9 A
Total 1,060 977 92.1% 7.4 0.4 A
7.4
Intersection 2 Bayshore Road/I-680 SB On-Ramp Uncontrolled
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 30 29 95.7% 2.0 1.2 A
Through 570 502 88.1% 2.5 0.3 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 600 531 88.5% 2.4 0.3 A
Left Turn
Through 40 40 100.5% 0.7 0.3 A
Right Turn 250 240 96.2% 1.0 0.1 A
Subtotal 290 281 96.8% 1.0 0.1 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 890 811 91.2% 2.0 0.2 A
2.5
NB
SB
EB
WB
NB
SB
EB
WB
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Cumulative Base
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 3 Bayshore Road/I-680 NB Off-Ramp Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through 50 48 95.6% 0.6 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 50 48 95.6% 0.6 0.1 A
Left Turn
Through 40 40 100.8% 0.1 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 40 40 100.8% 0.1 0.1 A
Left Turn 550 483 87.8% 483.7 31.1 F
Through
Right Turn 60 50 83.3% 483.4 32.7 F
Subtotal 610 533 87.3% 483.6 31.3 F
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 700 621 88.7% 410.6 25.7 F
483.7
Intersection 4 Bay Vista Court/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 10 10 97.0% 5.7 1.2 A
Through
Right Turn 10 7 72.0% 3.4 1.6 A
Subtotal 20 17 84.5% 4.8 1.0 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 40 38 94.5% 0.3 0.1 A
Right Turn 10 8 82.0% 0.5 0.1 A
Subtotal 50 46 92.0% 0.3 0.1 A
Left Turn 30 28 93.7% 0.6 0.5 A
Through 70 66 93.9% 0.1 0.0 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 100 94 93.8% 0.3 0.2 A
Total 170 157 92.2% 0.8 0.1 A
5.7
WB
EB
WB
NB
NB
EB
SB
SB
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Cumulative Base
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 5 Valero Refinery Entrance/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn 10 10 98.0% 11.2 5.4 B
Through
Right Turn 30 27 90.3% 7.5 1.3 A
Subtotal 40 37 92.3% 8.3 1.4 A
Left Turn 40 36 90.0% 2.8 1.8 A
Through 510 451 88.4% 0.1 0.0 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 550 487 88.5% 0.3 0.1 A
Left Turn
Through 350 346 98.8% 0.7 0.1 A
Right Turn 50 50 99.0% 1.3 0.6 A
Subtotal 400 395 98.9% 0.7 0.2 A
Total 990 919 92.8% 0.8 0.1 A
11.2
SB
EB
WB
NB
Volume (vph)
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Cumulative Base Plus Project
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 1 Bayshore Road/Park Road All-way Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 40 32 79.8% 7.2 2.3 A
Through 30 25 84.0% 8.9 3.4 A
Right Turn 500 389 77.7% 102.8 12.5 F
Subtotal 570 446 78.2% 90.8 10.9 F
Left Turn 30 28 93.7% 127.1 71.5 F
Through 20 19 92.5% 55.4 47.0 F
Right Turn 10 10 104.0% 50.9 63.0 F
Subtotal 60 57 95.0% 92.4 55.3 F
Left Turn 10 9 88.0% 50.7 79.1 F
Through 20 18 87.5% 108.0 78.3 F
Right Turn 20 17 85.0% 50.7 74.5 F
Subtotal 50 43 86.6% 76.5 66.6 F
Left Turn 250 244 97.8% 121.3 12.3 F
Through 50 50 100.8% 94.0 54.3 F
Right Turn 80 79 98.4% 86.5 34.3 F
Subtotal 380 374 98.3% 111.3 8.1 F
Total 1,060 920 86.8% 100.3 9.3 F
100.3
Intersection 2 Bayshore Road/I-680 SB On-Ramp Uncontrolled
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 30 25 82.0% 12.0 21.3 B
Through 570 446 78.3% 81.5 8.1 F
Right Turn
Subtotal 600 471 78.5% 76.8 6.2 F
Left Turn
Through 40 39 96.3% 1.6 0.5 A
Right Turn 250 242 96.8% 1.9 0.2 A
Subtotal 290 280 96.7% 1.8 0.3 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 890 751 84.4% 40.5 2.9 E
81.5
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
SB
EB
WB
NB
SB
EB
WB
NB
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Cumulative Base Plus Project
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 3 Bayshore Road/I-680 NB Off-Ramp Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through 50 48 95.8% 0.6 0.2 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 50 48 95.8% 0.6 0.2 A
Left Turn
Through 40 39 96.5% 0.1 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 40 39 96.5% 0.1 0.1 A
Left Turn 550 423 76.8% 646.9 27.8 F
Through
Right Turn 60 44 72.7% 628.5 37.5 F
Subtotal 610 466 76.4% 645.0 28.2 F
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 700 553 79.0% 550.8 26.3 F
646.9
Intersection 4 Bay Vista Court/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 10 10 99.0% 5.2 0.4 A
Through
Right Turn 10 7 70.0% 3.0 1.7 A
Subtotal 20 17 84.5% 4.3 0.7 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 40 36 91.0% 0.2 0.1 A
Right Turn 10 10 97.0% 0.5 0.4 A
Subtotal 50 46 92.2% 0.3 0.1 A
Left Turn 30 26 88.0% 0.4 0.2 A
Through 70 66 94.7% 0.1 0.0 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 100 93 92.7% 0.2 0.1 A
Total 170 156 91.6% 0.8 0.1 A
5.2
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
SB
EB
SB
WB
EB
WB
NB
NB
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Cumulative Base Plus Project
Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour
Intersection 5 Valero Refinery Entrance/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn 10 9 94.0% 57.9 103.4 F
Through
Right Turn 30 28 91.7% 77.0 57.1 F
Subtotal 40 37 92.3% 69.1 59.4 F
Left Turn 40 33 82.0% 11.7 26.0 B
Through 510 402 78.8% 7.0 2.5 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 550 435 79.1% 7.5 0.4 A
Left Turn
Through 350 347 99.0% 129.6 23.2 F
Right Turn 50 49 97.0% 115.2 39.5 F
Subtotal 400 395 98.8% 128.0 18.8 F
Total 990 867 87.5% 76.1 8.9 F
129.6
Volume (vph)
SB
EB
WB
NB
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Cumulative Base Plus Project
Volume and Delay by Movement AM
Intersection 1 Bayshore Road/Park Road All-way Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 24 26 107.1% 19.3 26.2 C
Through 18 20 109.4% 20.0 28.8 C
Right Turn 295 284 96.3% 92.3 7.1 F
Subtotal 337 330 97.8% 83.1 5.9 F
Left Turn 18 16 91.1% 127.0 95.0 F
Through 12 11 90.0% 74.2 102.7 F
Right Turn 6 6 95.0% 10.0 16.9 A
Subtotal 36 33 91.4% 83.0 72.1 F
Left Turn 6 5 75.0% 63.1 105.7 F
Through 12 10 81.7% 75.5 81.4 F
Right Turn 12 9 78.3% 5.7 4.2 A
Subtotal 30 24 79.0% 47.7 59.3 E
Left Turn 148 142 95.8% 141.2 19.6 F
Through 30 27 91.0% 122.1 67.3 F
Right Turn 47 48 102.8% 128.3 50.4 F
Subtotal 225 217 96.6% 135.9 17.3 F
Total 628 604 96.1% 102.4 11.0 F
102.4
Intersection 2 Bayshore Road/I-680 SB On-Ramp Uncontrolled
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 18 19 102.8% 6.1 13.6 A
Through 337 329 97.7% 62.8 5.6 F
Right Turn
Subtotal 355 348 97.9% 59.5 5.3 F
Left Turn
Through 24 24 98.3% 1.9 1.2 A
Right Turn 148 139 93.6% 1.6 0.3 A
Subtotal 172 162 94.3% 1.6 0.4 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 527 510 96.7% 39.8 3.9 E
62.8
NB
SB
EB
WB
NB
SB
EB
WB
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Cumulative Base Plus Project
Volume and Delay by Movement AM
Intersection 3 Bayshore Road/I-680 NB Off-Ramp Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through 30 29 97.0% 74.4 40.3 F
Right Turn
Subtotal 30 29 97.0% 74.4 40.3 F
Left Turn
Through 24 24 98.8% 0.1 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 24 24 98.8% 0.1 0.1 A
Left Turn 325 319 98.0% 172.7 29.8 F
Through
Right Turn 35 36 103.4% 139.7 71.5 F
Subtotal 360 355 98.6% 169.8 30.3 F
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 414 408 98.5% 152.4 27.2 F
172.7
Intersection 4 Bay Vista Court/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 6 5 78.3% 5.1 0.6 A
Through
Right Turn 6 4 73.3% 3.1 1.9 A
Subtotal 12 9 75.8% 4.3 0.8 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 24 19 80.8% 0.2 0.1 A
Right Turn 6 5 88.3% 0.7 0.6 A
Subtotal 30 25 82.3% 0.3 0.2 A
Left Turn 18 17 95.6% 0.3 0.1 A
Through 42 42 99.0% 0.1 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 60 59 98.0% 0.2 0.1 A
Total 102 93 90.8% 0.7 0.2 A
5.1
WB
EB
WB
NB
NB
EB
SB
SB
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs Cumulative Base Plus Project
Volume and Delay by Movement AM
Intersection 5 Valero Refinery Entrance/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn 6 6 98.3% 4.9 5.8 A
Through
Right Turn 18 15 84.4% 42.9 37.8 E
Subtotal 24 21 87.9% 32.6 27.7 D
Left Turn 24 24 101.3% 1.9 1.3 A
Through 301 286 95.0% 8.1 0.4 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 325 310 95.4% 7.7 0.4 A
Left Turn
Through 207 202 97.5% 43.9 21.9 E
Right Turn 30 32 106.7% 45.8 40.3 E
Subtotal 237 234 98.6% 43.7 22.1 E
Total 586 565 96.4% 24.7 10.1 C
45.8
SB
EB
WB
NB
Volume (vph)
Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs CB PLUS PROJECT PM
Volume and Delay by Movement PM
Intersection 1 Bayshore Road/Park Road All-way Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served GEH Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 4 3 82.5% 0.4 2.2 1.8 A
Through 3 3 86.7% 0.2 2.1 2.6 A
Right Turn 45 39 87.6% 0.9 111.6 38.7 F
Subtotal 52 45 87.1% 1.0 88.4 33.8 F
Left Turn 3 2 70.0% 0.6 42.3 73.5 E
Through 2 1 35.0% 1.1 1.0 2.2 A
Right Turn 1 1 130.0% 0.3 1.3 2.3 A
Subtotal 6 4 68.3% 0.8 25.3 41.3 D
Left Turn 1 1 50.0% 0.6
Through 2 1 50.0% 0.8 21.4 43.8 C
Right Turn 2 2 85.0% 0.2 1.1 1.4 A
Subtotal 5 3 64.0% 0.9 12.8 24.7 B
Left Turn 23 23 101.3% 0.1 141.1 52.5 F
Through 5 5 98.0% 0.0 125.9 146.3 F
Right Turn 7 7 102.9% 0.1 116.1 138.9 F
Subtotal 35 35 101.1% 0.1 138.0 38.2 F
Total 98 88 89.8% 1.0 102.1 17.2 F
102.1
Intersection 2 Bayshore Road/I-680 SB On-Ramp Uncontrolled
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served GEH Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 3 3 113.3% 0.2 0.1 0.2 A
Through 52 45 86.5% 1.0 0.3 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 55 48 88.0% 0.9 0.3 0.1 A
Left Turn
Through 4 3 70.0% 0.7 0.0 0.0 A
Right Turn 23 23 100.0% 0.0 0.8 0.4 A
Subtotal 27 26 95.6% 0.2 0.7 0.3 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 82 74 90.5% 0.9 0.4 0.1 A
0.8
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
SB
EB
WB
NB
SB
EB
WB
NB
Fehr & Peers 3/27/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs CB PLUS PROJECT PM
Volume and Delay by Movement PM
Intersection 3 Bayshore Road/I-680 NB Off-Ramp Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served GEH Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through 5 4 80.0% 0.5 0.0 0.0 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 5 4 80.0% 0.5 0.0 0.0 A
Left Turn
Through 4 3 70.0% 0.7 0.0 0.0 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 4 3 70.0% 0.7 0.0 0.0 A
Left Turn 50 44 88.4% 0.8 5.9 0.7 A
Through
Right Turn 5 5 108.0% 0.2 5.4 0.8 A
Subtotal 55 50 90.2% 0.7 5.8 0.6 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Total 64 56 88.1% 1.0 5.0 0.6 A
5.9
Intersection 4 Bay Vista Court/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served GEH Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn 1 0 0.0% 1.4
Through
Right Turn 1 0 0.0% 1.4
Subtotal 2 0 0.0% 2.0 0.0 0.0 A
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn
Through 4 3 80.0% 0.4 0.1 0.0 A
Right Turn 1 1 80.0% 0.2 0.2 0.3 A
Subtotal 5 4 80.0% 0.5 0.1 0.1 A
Left Turn 3 3 103.3% 0.1 0.1 0.2 A
Through 7 7 92.9% 0.2 0.0 0.1 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 10 10 96.0% 0.1 0.1 0.1 A
Total 17 14 80.0% 0.9 0.1 0.0 A
0.2
Volume (vph)
Volume (vph)
SB
EB
SB
WB
EB
WB
NB
NB
Fehr & Peers 3/27/2013
VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA
Average Results from 10 Runs CB PLUS PROJECT PM
Volume and Delay by Movement PM
Intersection 5 Valero Refinery Entrance/Park Road Side-street Stop
Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)
Direction Movement Demand Served Served GEH Average Std. Dev. LOS
Left Turn
Through
Right Turn
Subtotal
Left Turn 1 1 80.0% 0.2 0.5 1.5 A
Through
Right Turn 3 3 110.0% 0.2 4.2 2.0 A
Subtotal 4 4 102.5% 0.0 3.7 1.1 A
Left Turn 4 3 65.0% 0.8 1.2 2.1 A
Through 46 40 86.3% 1.0 0.0 0.0 A
Right Turn
Subtotal 50 42 84.6% 1.1 0.1 0.2 A
Left Turn
Through 32 32 100.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 A
Right Turn 5 5 98.0% 0.0 0.2 0.2 A
Subtotal 37 37 100.0% 0.0 0.0 0.1 A
Total 91 83 91.6% 0.8 0.3 0.1 A
4.2
Volume (vph)
SB
EB
WB
NB
Fehr & Peers 3/27/2013