Upload
avis-lloyd
View
243
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Dr. Werner SteinhöglProgramme officer DG CONNECT – A3
European Commission
Future Cyber-Physical Systems Platforms
Road2CPS / CONNECT A3 Workshop
Turin, 8 October 2015
Why this workshop?
• ARTEMIS community works on key nodes of the digital value chains of the future: safety-critical and real-time systems
• The ones who master and control these nodes will have a competitive advantage
• Europe needs to prepare
2
Strategy:Products, Processes and Business models
3
"Digital inside": Innovations in all types of products• Smart connected objects powered by Sensors, wearables, embedded
software, Connectivity, Big data, Cloud … • Large opportunities in all sectors (Non-tech, high-tech, SMEs, etc)
Digital transformations of processes• From logistics and product design to automation
Increasing resource efficiency, productivity, .. Build on CPS, IoT, digital design, big data,..
Radical/disruptive changes in business models• Blurring the boundaries (products-services), reshuffling value chains
XaaS, 3D Printing & customisation, CRMs, maintenance added value services Built on real time information, data analytics, etc.
• Lack of standards and interoperable solutions
• New competition from non-EU digital platform
owners
• Fragmentation of effort in Europe
Digital transformation of industry: What is the situation?
Strong digitisation in high tech industries and in some Member States.
But:
4
Digitising European Industry:Proposal for four key lines of action
5
Topic of the Day
Action Line 2:Leadership in digital platforms for industry
Appropriate Instruments:• ECSEL Pilot Projects (yearly calls)
• PPP Work Programmes, e.g. FoF
• I4MS and alike
Estimated EU-level investment (5yrs): - At least 1 B€ through H2020- Leveraging up to 3B€ in total
Blahblahcar
eBay
Convergence of Platforms: Automotive sector example
7
Amazon
Google(search, youtube,
gmail, drive, android, …)
Apple
Criteo
Embedded PlatformsEU with significant global market share
Online Platformsdominated by non-EU
AUTOSAR
Autonomous
Fully electric
Trying a map
8
pre-commercial
commercial
Ebay
sectorialhorizontal
airBnBGoogle PlayAppstore/iTunes
Google Brillo
Autosar
ISOBUS
FI-WAREAIOTIIIRA
RAMI 4.0ROS
Uber MyMuesli
"365 farmnet" (Claas)
Vie
w t
o v
alu
e o
f th
e
eco
syst
em
/ d
irect
pro
fit
to p
rovid
er
General purpose or for a specific sectorRange of users (suppliers/demanders)
Amazon
Android/IOS
Virtual Fort Knox
IDS
Platform: What are we talking about?
• Not: Stakeholder groups: Industrie 4.0, European Technology Platforms
• Not: Technological platforms (Middleware, reference architectures, …)
• Instead: Economical multi-sided market platforms creating value by enabling interactions between two or more customer groups (often including the above) • Google:
People who search advertisers• Apple/Android:
People who buy a phone developers of apps• Amazon Marketplace:
People who search a product companies selling products
•
Platforms for connected Factories of the Future, Brussels, 5-6 Oct 2015
• Title: Platforms for connected Factories of the Future
• 5-6 October, 50 attendees
• Presentation of platform ideas in the plenary
• Structured discussion in working groups
• reporting back in plenary
• report will be ready by 20th October 2015
• Some of you attended
10
What happened in Brussels ? – The talks I
11
Existing Platform Activities (Chair: Max Lemke, Clemens Zielonka (EC))Virtual Fort Knox Thomas Bauernhansl (FhG IPA)
BEinCPPS (incl. FITMAN and FI-Ware)
Sergio Gusmeroli (Politecnico di Milano)
RAMI Peter Adolphs (Pepperl+Fuchs)
Industrial Data Space Sören Auer (FhG IAIS)
Role of CPS in manufacturing Marco Taisch (Politecnico di Milano)
IIRA Sebastian Haag (TU Darmstadt)
Logistics Platforms Thorsten Huelsmann (FhG IML)
Knowledge is the next platform Herman Bruyninckx (KU Leuven)
Platforms in CyProS Dominic Gorecky (DFKI)
AIOTI: Platforms and Standardisation
Jürgen Heiles (Siemens)
Arrowhead Jerker Delsing (LTU, Sweden)
Economy 4.0 + Vanguard platforms
Egbert-Jan Sol (TNO)
What happened in Brussels ? – The talks II
12
Industrial Platform Approaches (Chair: Željko Pazin (EFFRA))
Siemens Bernd Korves
Dassault Systemes François Bichet
SAP Uwe Kubach
ATOS Silvia Castellvi
IBM Friedrich Vollmar
Bosch-Rexroth Martin Hankel
From the discussions I
Goal of platform: reduce complexity
Risks: loss of independence
Opportunity: sharing of knowledge
Who should be involved: big automation industry (Siemens, ABB, Schneider Honeywell..), IT system integrator, machine manufacturers, SW and application developer
13
From the discussions II
Scope: 1. Network based PLC control system2. PLM platform3. Product-Process- Automation platformAlternative: safety critical operating systems; semantics, ontologies, taxonomies
How to cooperate?• Roles of companies• Guiding function of platforms: Eco-system grow around platforms
Positioning in global context • RAMI has extra requirements for manufacturing • IIRA of the Industrial Internet Consortium is not specific enough, but
compatible
14
My take
• Several platforms include approaches for reference architectures
• Concepts are different with varying level of maturity
• Activities in DE appear to be intense: Digital Fort Knox, Industrial
Data Space, Reference Architectures RAMI
• Also NL, FR, ES , FI, SE and AT are active amongst others
• European Manufacturers Association EFFRA is active
• Discussion on the ideal platform concept has not been conclusive
15
Back up
16
Where does Europe stand?
Strengths• Professional and vertical markets (products, services, engineering)
─ E.g. energy, machinery, machine tools, auto, aero, health …• World class research & development hubs• Large EU market (~27% of world ICT market)
Weaknesses• Consumer markets, Internet and web products and services, data
platforms' ownership• Structural weaknesses, e.g. no Digital Single Market yet, insufficient
investment in R&D&I
Opportunities• High growth "Smart X" and IoT markets• High growth of vertical markets!!• Next digital champions may come from "non-digital" industries
17
Characteristics of platforms
• Product or platform?• A product is largely proprietary and under one company’s control• An industry platform is a foundation technology or service that
enables an interdependent ecosystem of businesses (Gemini 4.0: development space for business models)
• The platform requires complementary innovations (created by the "complementors")
• Open or closed?• Some level of openness is necessary to enable complementors
(developers) to interact with the platform, e.g.• API's (Application Programming Interface)• SDK (Software Development Kit)
• Necessary to go through standardisation?• Some platforms are based on standards, others are not• Alternative: "quasi"-standardisation
• by strong market actors or groups of actors • model of the successful on-line platform actors• Standardisation limited to interoperability with other platforms – if at all
18