Dr. Ronald M. SegaDirector, Defense Research and Engineering

2

• DoD Research and Engineering (R&E) “Priorities”• Transformational Technology Initiatives

• National Aerospace Initiative• Energy & Power Technologies• Surveillance and Knowledge Systems

• Global War on Terrorism• Summary

3

Research & Engineering Priorities

• Focus & Integrate DoD R&E on “Transformation”• Enhance Technology Transition• Address National Security S&E Workforce• Expand Outreach to Combatant Commands and

Intelligence Community• Accelerate Support to the War on Terrorism

4

R&E Priorities - Expanded

• Focus and Integrate DoD S&T on “Transformation”• Aligned Investment in Six Transformational Operational Capabilities• Initiated Three Cross-Cutting Initiatives• Enhanced Emphasis on Transformation Initiatives

• Enhance Technology Transition Efforts• Enhanced Primary Transition Efforts under DUSD (Advanced

Systems and Concepts)• Increase Investment in Technology Transition Efforts (Quick

Reaction Special Projects and Advanced Concept TechnologyDemonstrations)

• Expanded Use of Technology Readiness Assessments as Part ofDefense Acquisition Board Major Program Reviews

5

R&E Priorities - Expanded(Continued)

• Address National Security S&E Workforce• Started Secondary School Initiative – Rekindling S&E interest• Initiated a University Freshman Science Program• Joined NASA in University Consortia

• Expand Outreach to Combatant Commands and IntelligenceCommunity

• DDR&E Representative Identified for Each Combatant Commander• Outreach to Collection Management Staff S&T Planning

• Accelerate Support to the War on Terrorism• DoD Combating Terrorism Technology Task Force• Several Accelerated Efforts Heading to, or in Theater• Task Force Continues to Identify Opportunities for Follow-on Operations

6

S&T and Transformation

• About 80% of DoD S&T Program Applies to One or More of theSix “Critical Operational Goals”

• There are significant transformational projects that are on-going• National Aerospace Initiative• Energy and Power Technologies• Surveillance and Knowledge• Future Combat Systems• Objective Force Warrior• FORCENet• Precision Engagement

• The FY04 PBR increases investment in several cross-cutting areas.• Hypersonic Flight / National Aerospace Initiative• Advanced Energetics

7

Continuum of Tech TransitionComplementary Approaches to Meet Warfighter Needs

Quick Reaction Projects

ATDs and ACTDs

Formal Acquisition Programs

Technology Transition Opportunities

•Thermobaric weapon•Thermobaric Hellfire•Anthrax Kill Curve

•Predator•Blue Force Tracking

•JSF•FCS

6 mos 1 yr 3 yrs 5 yrs

Co

mp

lexi

ty o

f E

ffo

rt

8

Quick Reaction Special Projects

Idea/TechnologyOpportunity

TransitionTo Planned/Fielded

System

Improve Subsystem à

Program of Record

Technology Maturity

Quick Reaction Fund Technology TransitionInitiative

Defense AcquisitionChallenge

Three Complementary Projects to DevelopTechnology at Different Maturity Levels

9

•Quick Reaction FundProvides flexibility to respond to emergent DoD needs within budgetcycleTakes advantage of technology breakthroughs in rapidly evolvingtechnologiesCompletion of projects within a 6-12 month period

• Technology Transition InitiativeEstablishes a Technology Transition CouncilJump starts selected components/subsystems into systems

•Defense Acquisition Challenge ProgramProvides opportunities for inserting innovative and cost-savingtechnology into acquisition programsFunds used only for review and evaluation of proposals, notimplementation

Quick Reaction Special Projects

10

Knowledge

SpeedAgility

Lethality

• Transformation Attributes

• Transformation Technology Initiatives– National Aerospace Initiative– Energy and Power Technologies–Surveillance and Knowledge Systems

Transformation Technology Initiatives

11

National Aerospace Initiative- Strategic and Tactical Framework

• Hypersonics– Strategic Strike, Time Critical Targets, Suborbital

Vehicles, UCAVs, Fast Transportation, etc.

• Access to Space– Two Stage to Orbit: 1st - Air Breathing, 2nd - Rocket;

Single Stage to Orbit

• Advanced Space Technologies– Microsats, Multifunction Satellites, etc.

12

National Aerospace Initiative (NAI)Technology Framework

NAI

Space Access

Expendable(Missiles)

Reusable[Mach 0 - 12]

Reusable Launch Vehicle

Long-RangeStrike

[Mach 0-7]

Air-Breathing 1st Stage (TSTO)

[Mach 0 - 12]

4<Mach<15

Mach<4

2nd Stage Rocket Engine

FlexibleComm

ISR

• Strategic Focus• Technical Coordination• Aerospace Workforce

TCT/NPRDoD/NASA

Space Commission

Synergy Goal: 1 + 1 + 1 > 3

SpaceTechnology

High Speed Hypersonics

ResponsivePayloads

Space Maneuvering

Vehicle

Space Control

13

Long RangeStrike

Cruise

Space Access

Time Criti

cal Target

SEAD

Boost/AscentAnti-accessTheater of Operation

Value of Speed

Cruise

Missile Defense

NPR

Reconnaissance

The National Aerospace InitiativeSustaining US Aerospace Leadership

14

The National Aerospace InitiativeSustaining US Aerospace Leadership

WeaponsWeapons

Space AccessSpace Access

Supersonic/Hypersonic Missiles(Time-critical targets)

Hypersonic Cruiser(Global Reach/Attack)

PursueStepping-StoneApproachNear-Term

Mid-Term

Far-Term

RLV (Affordable, timelyaccess to space)

WeaponsWeapons

Space AccessSpace Access

Supersonic/Hypersonic Missiles(Time-critical targets)

Hypersonic Cruiser(Global Reach/Attack)

PursueStepping-StoneApproachNear-Term

Mid-Term

Far-Term

RLV (Affordable, timelyaccess to space)

• Mach Number Per Year to 2012• Significantly decrease time to target• Accelerate Access to Space Capability• Provide alternatives for global strike• Advance Space Technology

15

Mach Number per Year to 2012

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 20200

5

25

Mac

h N

um

ber

10

15

F-4

SR-71

F-15 F-16 F-22

Hydrocarbon Scramjet Mach 4-7

Production

NAIRamjet

Mach 3-4

High Speed TurbineMach 2-4

X-15

Concorde

XB-70

B-2F-117

Hydrogen ScramjetMach 8-15

Missiles

Strike Aircraft

Space AccessX-Vehicles

National Aerospace Initiative

Hypersonic ComponentTechnology Development andGround Demonstrations

NAIHypersonic SystemTechnology Development andFlight Demonstrations

16

Expendable

Mach<4 Mach 4-15

High SpeedTurbine/Ramjet

RocketBoost

Scramjet“missile”

shapeRocket Boost

Scramjet Waverider orLifting BodySupersonic

CruiseMissile

Long RangeWeapon-Strike-Interceptor

Mid RangeWeapon-Strike-Interceptor

Re-Usable

Mach 0-7 Mach 0-12

Hydrocarbonfueled

Turbine-based

CombineCycle w/

Waverider

Long RangeStrike

Hydrogen-fueled

Turbine-basedCombine Cyclew/Lifting Body

ResponsiveSpaceAccess

Building BlockTechnologies

High-SpeedTurbine

ThermalProtection

Turbine-basedCombined

Cycle

Aerodynamics

Building BlockTechnologies

High-SpeedTurbine

ThermalProtection

Hydrogen Fuel

HydrocarbonScramjet

Aerodynamics

Capabilities

Demonstrations

Flight Regimes

Technology Development Approach-- High Speed / Hypersonics --

17

- Enabling An “Electric” Force -

• Power Generation

– Nuclear, Diesel, Jet Engine, Solar Array, Fuel Cells, etc.

• Energy Storage

– Batteries, Fly Wheels, Capacitors, Energetics, etc.

• Power Management and Control

– Energy Conversion, Catapults, etc.

• Directed Energy Weapons

– Lasers, Microwave, Millimeter Wave, etc.

18

FY02 FY12

Power N

eeds

POWERGENERATION

• Fuel Cells & FuelReforming

• Novel Power

ENERGY STORAGE

• Batteries• Capacitors

POWER MANAGEMENT& CONTROL

• Switching &Conditioning

• Power Transmission& Distribution

• Thermal Management

FUEL CELL

New OperationalNew OperationalCapabilitiesCapabilities

Electric Warship

Warrior

High Power Microwave

Space Based Radar

Hybrid/ElectricCombat Vehicle

Electric/HybridWeapons

More Electric Aircraft

Electric Warship

Energy and Power TechnologiesEnabling An “Electric” Force

19

Sec Min Hrs Days Month Years

1 G

10 M

100K

1K

10

0.1

0.001

Mission Length

Po

wer

, Wat

ts

DoDFocus

CommercialFocus

X DirectedEnergy Weapons

X Ship DDX(Destroyer)

X Future CombatSystem, Mobility

X Cameras

X Satellites

X Warrior

X Cars

X Watches

X Laptops

X Home

X Tools

X Cell Phones

Energy and Power Technologies

20

Surveillance andKnowledge System

• Sensors and Unmanned Vehicles (Bio Detectors,

Robotics, UAVs, etc.)

• High Bandwidth Communications / Information Assurance

• Information / Knowledge Management Systems

• Cyber Warfare

21

Surveillance and KnowledgeEnabling Integrated C4ISR

Decisions

Data

Information

Knowledge

Understanding

Wisdom

CP1

…

…

…

Sensing

“Common” Pictures

Networks

Warfighters

Collab. & Planning

Collab. & Planning

Collab. & Planning

CP2 CP3 CPn

Collab. & Planning

CivilNGO

Coalition

Sensing

Networks

Warfighters/Decisionmakers

Collaboration & PlanningT

aski

ng

JCS ServicesCoComs

IC

Operational history, Cultural

factors, Surveillance

history

Predictive Battlespace Awareness

Virtual “Common” PicturesIntegration, Abstraction, Display

• Adaptive Networks• Ubiquitous Sensors• Decision Aids

22

DoD Combating Terrorism Technology TaskForce (CTTTF) - Phase I (Sep 2001 - Jan 2002)

•Terms of Reference– Technologies to Combat Terrorism– Deliverables – Near (1 Month), Mid (1 Year), Long (5 Years)– Develop an Action Plan

• Participants / Lead Organization(s)• Process For Soliciting, Evaluating, and Prioritizing Technology

Candidates

– Collaboration: Military Services, Joint Staff, DefenseAgencies

•Key Phase I Products --Thermobaric WeaponConventional Air-Launched

Cruise Missile (CALCM)Nuclear QuadrupoleResonance Detector

Penetrator

23

Year

EstimatedTotal

Bill

ion

s o

f 87

$

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 20001970196519601955

U.S. Gov. – DoD

U.S. Commercial

DoD

E.U. and Japan

Projected

Source: Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on the TechnologyCapabilities of Non-DoD Providers; June 2000; Data provided by the Organizationfor Economic Cooperation and Development & National Science Foundation

U.S. and WorldwideResearch Base Since WWII

24

Engineering PhD’s

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

7,000

1992 15-Jun 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

S&E (Produced in US) S&E (US Cit)

25

• Robust, Integrated, Capabilities-Based Research andEngineering Program is Vital to Transforming the Force

• FY 04 PBR is aligned with Transformation

• National Security Workforce and Laboratories areCritical

• DoD R&E is “Accelerating the Transition of Technologyinto Operational Capability”

26

CTTTF - Phase II(Initiated May 2002)

• The “Next Theater of Operations”– Exploit lessons learned from recent operations– Engage Joint Staff & Combatant Commanders for emerging

needs– Update warfighters on technology options

• Update Phase I CTTTF results• Homeland Security support• Special Topics

– Suicide bombers, MANPADS, othersInteragency Coordination: White House OHS, CIA, DoE, State, Treasury … Interagency Coordination: White House OHS, CIA, DoE, State, Treasury …

• Intelligence, Surveillance &Reconnaissance

• Weapons of Mass Destruction• Coalition Command, Control,

Computers, Communications &Intelligence (C4I)

• C4I Infrastructure• Humanitarian Assistance

• Information Operations• Language Translation• Network Assurance• Power & Power Management• Remote Operations• Force Protection

Focus Areas:Focus Areas:

27

• Sensing:Management and tasking ofpervasive, persistent sensors forenhancing battlespaceknowledge

• Comms & Networking:Guaranteed, 365x24x7, mobile,information access and delivery(always-on “internet dial tone”)

• Knowledge Management:Dramatically improved speed ofcommand through integratedCommon Picture, Collaboration, andPlanning

• Information Security (Cyber Ops):Network protection, informationassurance; offensive disruption

Information and Decision Dominance achieved throughintegrated C4ISR technologies that enable seamless,

interoperable, knowledge-based, and assuredJoint & Coalition Network-Centric Operations & Warfare.

In response to QDR, Defense Planning Guidance, and JV 2020:

28

Potential Advanced Electric PowerApplications

• Dramatically Improved Sustainability, Maintainability and Logistics:– JP8 fuel replaces batteries

• Extended Operations in Hostile Environments:– Silent Watch & Silent Mobility

• Electric Launch and Recovery:– Control of forces applied to aircraft

• Electric Power Generation & Storage for Enhanced Lethality &Survivability:– Directed Energy Weapons (HEL/HPM)– Electrothermal Chemical (ETC) & Electromagnetic (EM) Guns– Electric Armor & Active Protection

29

Passive Attack Weapon (CBU-107/B QRC)Passive Attack Weapon (CBU-107/B QRC)

1500 ft Height-of-Function

Large - 362Medium - 1004Small – 2406

Program Deliverables

• 240 Weapons (Buy-to-Budget)• Collateral Effects Prediction Tool

• Red-lined TOs

• CBU-107 Pilot Instructions

• CBU-87 Fuze/Prox/Body Section• CBU-97/105 Aft Plate Assembly• WCMD Tail Kit w/ upgraded IMU• Employment Identical to CBU-103

~ 110 ftDiameter

High Explosive

AD WEAPON

AD Fill

Crash Prompt Agent DefeatCrash Prompt Agent Defeat(CrashPAD)(CrashPAD) Goals

• Deliver 10 weapons in 6 months• Perform a flight demonstration of a

modified MK-84 prototype weapon• Provide warfighter with reach back

capability enabling them toweaponeer and determine collateraleffects for weapon employment

• Quantify Collateral Effects ofprototype versus high explosivebaseline weapon

MilestonesüSmall-Scale Testing 23 Sep 02üPDR 10 Oct 02• HE Baseline Test 5 Dec 02• Sled Test 7 Jan 02• CDR 9 Jan 03• Static Test 15 Jan 03• Flight Test 26 Feb 03