Upload
evagret-pfeiffer
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 1
QM - Implementation
Deepening Topics
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 2
Stages of QM implementation
ProceduresTraining of QM-responsibles
Targets of clinic
Training of QM-Team leaders
Optimisation
Top management
Targets of departments
Therapeutic standards
Training of internal auditors
Current state analysis
QM-constitution
QM-manual
Certification
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 3
Documentation in QM-Systems
Other QM-Documents(Methods, Directives, Forms,
Checklists, Reports etc.)
SOPsStandards
QM-Manual
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 4
1. Purpose, targets, quality indicators2. Scope3. Co-applying documents4. Abbreviations, terms and definitions5. Responsibility6. Procedure7. Distribution8. Amendments
SOP - Structure
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 5
Targets: Indications and contraindications Patient group
Procedure: Workflow (Flow-Chart) What is essential / superfluous/ obsolete Monitoring of development (MEASURES!)
Recommendation: outpatient or stationary
Results: Summary of the known results of the recommended or not
recommended procedure
Structure of guidelines complying to BÄK/KBV I
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 6
Proof and selection criteria: Scientific evicende Evidence based Medicine
Benefit, side effects, costs Summary of the recommendations of the guideline Planning of the implementation Informations on usage of the guideline and efficacy Period of validity, responsibility for updating Informations on the elaboration of the guideline:
authors consensus procedure
Structure of guidelines complying to BÄK/KBV II
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 7
Patient wishes and Patient expectations
P Optimal Diagnosis and
Therapy of disease
Optimising outcome
minimising risks
Patient rights, Drugs, Medical Devices,
Hygienic requirements
Current state of medical and
nursing quality
Evidence based Medicine
Medical guidelines
ESTreatment Standard
Legislation and Authorities
Safety Aspects
Targets of a Treatment Standard
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 8
Surgical Procedure1. Disease, Purpose, Targets, Quality indicators 2. Indications and Contraindications3. Alternative procedures4. Preoperative Diagnostic5. Typical complication possibilities6. Surgical procedure
e.g. anaesthesic procedure, preoperative planning, bedding, instruction for the surgery, dressing, instruments, consumption material, implants, needs of time, costs and earnings
Example of a Treatment Standard I
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 9
Surgical Procedure7. Post-treatment 8. Documentation 9. Hints and Remarks10.Co-applying Documents11.Responsibilites, Qualifications12.Abbreviations, Terms and Definitions13.Time of validity, Responsibility for updating14.Procedure as Workflow (Flow-Chart)15.Distribution 16.Amendments
Example of a Treatment Standard II
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 10
1. Target2. Quality indicators3. Abbreviation, terms and definitions4. Diagnostic procedure 5. Scientific evidence6. Literature 7. Co-applying documents8. Alternatives9. Costs10.Distribution11.Amendments
Example of a Diagnostic Standard
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 11
Control of documents Control of records Audits Control of nonconforming products and service Corrective action Preventive action
6 documented standards required in ISO
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 12
Steps toward systematic QM
1. Analyse and structure the processes
2. Define SOP
+ Text
3. Compile QM-manual
VI Anlagen-verzeichnis
V 21 QM-Elemente
IV Abkürzungen
III Aufbau desQMH
II BeschreibungKrankenhaus
I Revisions-verzeichnis
Qualitätsmanagement-Handbuch
Krankenhaus
Verantwortung RA S V PA
E2
D5
D2
D4
I2
D3
M6
M3
I4
D6
R4
A = Arzt, S = Schwester, V = Verwaltung , PA = PatientenaufnahmeE = Entscheidung, D = Durchführung, M = Mitwirkung, I = Info, R = besonderes Risiko
2
3
4
6
5
1
7
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 13
Conceive potential failures in beforehand, control these and take preventive action
Prepare for thinkable occurance of failures and effects
Systematic minimizing occurance of failures in process
Failure effect minimizing action and prevention Failure assessment – Discussion with rating scales
Note:1. Prepare for the unexpected. It often happens in stress
situations, when preventive walls fall!2. QM is not an instrument only for the good seasons, it shows its
unique strength in stress situations!
Failure mode and effects analysis FMEA
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 14
1. Listing of potential failures2. Collect thinkable failure effects and reasons3. Estimate ocurrence probability in rating scale 1-104. Estimate impact of effects in rating scale 1-105. Estimate detection probability in rating scale 1-106. Calculate the risk priority number (Multiply the
values of steps 3 – 5)
10 steps of FMEA I
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 15
7. Develop corrective actions8. Assess the risk priority number again taking in
consideration the effects of possible corrective actions
9. Compare the two risk priority numbers10.Decide for measures with the greatest potential to
reduce the risks
10 steps of FMEA I
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 16
Collect potential risk with brain storming Assess the effects:
Probability of Ocurrance(1=unlikely, 2-3=very sparsely, 4-6=sparsely, 7-8=moderate, 9-10=high)
Impact of effects(1=hardly recognizable, 2-3=unimportant, 4-6=moderate severe, 7-8=severe effects, 9-10=extremely severe effects)
Probability of Detection (1=high, 2-5=moderate, 6-8=sparsely, 9=very sparsely, 10=unlikely)
O x I x D = RPN (risk priority number)(1=no, 125=medium, 1000=high Priority)
FMEA
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 17
FMEA am Beispiel Allgemeinchirurgie
Possible Failure O x I x D = RPN*
Not documented patient informed consent
8 7 8 448
Mix-up in Patient 1 10 1 10
Indication assessment too late 5 9 3 135
Doctor not available 2 9 1 18
Oxygen mask not connected 1 10 10
100
Fall of patient in post-anaesthesia care 2 5 9 90
*Note: Necessity for taking action also in case of high single assessment >7
Dr. Erwig PinterQKB-Qualität im Krankenhaus Beratungsgesellschaft mbH 18
Risk-graph
Occurrance probability
Often 6a 6b 6c 6d
probably 5a 5b 5c 5doccasionally 4a 4b 4c 4d
conceivable 3a 3b 3c 3d
unlikely 2a 2b 2c 2d
unthinkable 1a 1b 1c 1d negligible minor critical catastroph
ic
Extent of damage
= acceptabler region = ALARP-region (As Low as Reasonably Practicable) = inaceptable region