DR. ANDREAS KOLLIAS, IACM-FORTH

Evidence-based informed policy directions on/for SL

Scoping of WP2 and partners roles and responsibilities

Thursday 27 March

EPNoSL 3rd period kick-off meeting

EAC-2010-1388

Outline of WP2 (i)

DURATION: February 2014 – March 2015

DELIVERABLES D2.1: Commonly Agreed Plan on the content and

form of EPNoSL’s policy influence toolset (Internal guiding tool in an outline form) – April 2014

D2.2: EPNoSL Toolset for policy reflections, design and implementation (Public toolset) – March 2015

Outline of WP2 (ii) - Partners involvedPARTNERS ROLE AND TASKS IN THE WORK PACKAGE STAFF DAYS

Lead partner: FORTH (GR) Coordinates WP activity and develops the Plan. Oversees the development of resources / toolset package

75

The Danish School of Education, Aarhus University (DK) Develops 1/8 of toolset 20

University of Tartu (EE) Develops 1/8 of toolset 10

University of Innsbruck, Dept of Teacher Education and School Research (AT)

Develops 1/8 of toolset 20

Centre for Principal Development, UMEÅ University – CPD – UMU (SE)

Develops 1/8 of toolset 30

National Institute for Leadership in Education (SI) Develops 1/8 of toolset 20

The Institute of Educational Leadership, University of Jyväskylä (FI) Develops 1/8 of toolset 20

University of Durham and University of Hertfordshire Higher Education Corporation (UK)

Develop 1/8 of toolset 10 & 20 resp.

Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias (PT) Develop 1/8 of toolset 30

European Trade Union Committee for Education (BE) Ensures appropriateness of toolset from the professionals perspective

10

European School Heads Association (NL) Ensures appropriateness of toolset from the professionals perspective

10

SE Ministry Education Ensures appropriateness of toolset for Ministries 5

L' Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon (FR) Ensures appropriateness of toolset for the French context 15

Cyprus Pedagogical Institute (CY) Ensures appropriateness of toolset for the Cypriot context 10

Centre for School Management (LT) Oversees presentation issues 20

Faculty of Education Koper, University of Primorska (SI) Oversees presentation issues 30

How we co-create learning on/for SL developments?

Resources’ “transformation” process to:1) CORE KNOWLEDGE ON SL: identify in a concise shared document the core new

learning and perspective of the EPNoSL project2) WHAT IS POLICY: map policy as a phenomenon: what policy is and how we

conceptualize it (policy as legislation, regulations – policy as discourse) 3) POLICY MATERIALS: formulate an EPNoSL strategy to inform and influence policy

THROUGH co-creative, active peer learning approach (includes on-line recourses)4) MATERIALS FOR SL DEVELOPMENT: identify implications for leadership development.

Design of resources / tools for those concerned with leadership development (whether based in government, regional agencies, schools or other locations)

5) TRIAL OF RESOURCES / TOOLS: using the materials with groups of policy makers and practitioners to obtain their views and insights into how the materials relate to their experience. In light of this, the materials and the strategy in which their use is situated can be reviewed and refined AND validated.

WP2 main output: stand alone unit briefs (module like)

Design of Handbooks and other dissemination contents (3.000€) - Editing (2.000€) - Printing and /or production of videos (6.000€)

Commonly Agreed Plan on the content and form of EPNoSL’s policy influence toolset (conceptual orientation, form, type, content, media of the toolset) - April 2014