Upload
curtis-santos
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/28/2019 Download 375
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/download-375 1/6
* Corresponding author: K Kundu TERI University, New Delhi; 2MERADO, Ludhiana
ISSN: 0976-3031
RESEARCH ARTICLEETHANOLYSIS OF JATROPHA OIL AND PROCESS OPTIMIZATION
O P Chaturvedi1, Sanjay Mande1, Y P Abbi1, K Kundu*2
1TERI University, New Delhi; 2MERADO, Ludhiana
ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT
Ethanol is renewable in nature and it is preferable to prepare biodiesel; a renewable fuel
with the use of all renewable ingredients. However, production of biodiesel with bio-ethanolis relatively little more complex than compared to using chemical methanol. Here an
attempt has been made for the transesterification of jatropha oil with anhydrous and aqueousethanol through optimization of various process parameters such as catalyst concentration,reaction time and temperature. With anhydrous ethanol, the separation of glycerol layer
from the biodiesel phase was found somewhat difficult with selected process variables.Entire mixture was looked like homogeneous liquid for the selected settling time of 12 hrsand even till 72 hrs with anhydrous ethanol. No separation could be found with catalystconcentration level upto 1.0%. It was also clearly observed that, with increased catalystamount the yield of Jatropha ethyl ester (JEE) also increased and the highest yield 82.3%
was observed with 3.0% catalyst concentration. . However the corresponding viscosity of jatropha ethyl ester was observed 7.6 cSt, which is not in acceptable range as per the BISstandards. It is seen that in respect of viscosity and yield of ester, the results are very muchsymmetrical for the all the process chains and increasing yield of jatropha ethyl ester wasobserved with increasing purity of ethanol. This extensive experimental process
optimization study for the production of jatropha ethyl recommends reaction time of 75minutes, reaction temperature of 60ºC, molar ration of 6:1, and catalyst concentration of 3.0% with ethanol purity 85%.
INTRODUCTION
Biodiesel is renewable in nature and can be blended at anylevel with petroleum diesel to create a biodiesel blend or canalso be used in its pure form. Just like petroleum derived diesel
(petro-diesel), biodiesel operates in compression ignition (CI)engine; which essentially requires very little or no enginemodifications, because quite similar properties. Technical
advantages of biodiesel include biodegradability, excellentlubricity and high flash point, which make the fuel safe tohandle and transport (Knothe, 2002).
Besides biodegradable, it is nontoxic and has low emission
profiles making it environmentally beneficial (Michael et al,1998). Both edible oils such as Soybean, Rapeseeds, Canola,Sunflower, Cottonseeds, etc. and non-edible oils like Jatropha
( Jatropha curcas), Karanja (Pongamia pinnata), Jojoba(Simmondsia chinensis), Mahua ( Madhuca latifolia) etc. have been tried to supplement diesel fuel in various countries. In
US, biodiesel program is based on their surplus edible oils likesoybean and in Europe from rapeseed and sunflower oils.However in India emphasis has always been on exploring the
possibility of using non-edible oils for biodiesel productionand a program has been undertaken for large-scale cultivation
of jatropha on wastelands thoughout the country (PlanningCommission Report, 2003). There are a number of ways tomake the vegetable oil equivalent to diesel fuel. Thesemethods include; Transesterification, Pyrolysis, Micro
Emulsion, blending and thermal depolymerization (Srivastavaand Prasad, 2000). The most common method to prepare
biodiesel is transesterification of vegetable oil with a mono-hydric alcohol (Figure 1) or esterification of fatty acids(Figure 2). Transesterification is one of the reactions that are
used to prepare esters (Otera, 1993). This is not a new processand by all accounts it was conducted as early as 1853, by thetwo chemists E. Duffy and J. Partrick. One of the first uses of
transestrified vegetable oil was powering heavy-duty vehiclesisSouthAfricabeforeWorldWar II(www.dfwbiodiesel.com/tech
nology.html). Transesterification of vegetable oil is the processof reacting triglycerides with methanol in order to obtain fattyacid methyl esters and glycerol and the process is important for preparation
Figure 1 Transesterification of triglycerides
Figure 2 Esterification of free fatty acids
CH2
CH
CH2
HO
HO
HO
Triglyceride Alcohol Alkyl esters Glycerol
+ 3ROH
Catalyst
+
R 1COOR
R 2COOR
R 3COOR
CH2
CH
CH2
R 1COO
R 2COO
R 3COO
Fatty acid Alcohol Alkyl esters
+ROH R
1
COOR R 1
COOH + H2O
Catalyst
Acid
Available Online at http://www.recentscientific.com
International Journal
of Recent Scientific Research International Journal of Recent Scientific Research
Vol. 4, Issue, 6, pp.1005– 1010, July, 2013
Article History:
Received 14th, June, 2013
Received in revised form 26th, June, 2013
Accepted 16th, July, 2013
Published online 30th July, 2013
Key words:
Jatropha, Ethyl ester, esterification,
transesterification, Biodiesel, biodiesel plant
© Copy Right, IJRSR, 2013, Academic Journals. All rights reserved.
7/28/2019 Download 375
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/download-375 2/6
International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, Vol. 4, Issue, 7, pp. 1005 - 1010, July, 2013
1006
Alkali catalysts are commonly used for transesterification of oils since they require short reaction time even at room
temperature (Encinar et al., 2002). Other types of catalystsused for transesterification includes bronsted acids (sulfuricacid, sulfonic acid, etc.) (Goff et al., 2004), heterogeneous
catalysts such as basic zeolites, alkaline metal compounds,enzymes such as lipases (Meher et al., 2006) and also anionexchange resins (Toda et al., 2004). The high free fatty acid
(FFA) content oil needs acid catalyzed pretreatment to lower the acid value by esterification of FFA (Figure 2), followed byalkali catalyzed transesterification of the glycerides for
preparation of fatty acid alkyl esters (Canakci and Gerpen,1999; Canakci and Gerpen, 2001). The transesterification of vegetable oil is also accomplished in supercritical methanol
without catalyst. Saka and Kusdiana (2001) had studied the preparation of biodiesel in supercritical methanol attemperature > 239.4ºC and pressure > 8.09MPa where the
reaction was completed in 4minutes. In addition, the processhas been used for simultaneous esterification of free fatty acidsand transesterification of triglyceride for biodiesel preparation
from high free fatty acid rapeseed oil (Kusdiana and Saka,
2001; Warabi et al., 2003). Non-catalytic alcoholysis of oilsfor biodiesel preparation has also been reported in the literature
(Dasari et al., 2003; Yamazaki et al., 2004).
Ethanolysis is often discussed as the more environmentallyfriendly alternatives, as it allows the production of an entirelynatural fuel, if the alcohol is derived from fermentation of
harvested residue, i.e. bio-ethanol. As opposed to this,methanol is mainly produced from fossil sources. A very fewreports are available for transesterification of vegetable oil
with higher grade of alcohol and these reports reveal that thereaction is difficult at selected temperature and more problemson separation of glycerol and biodiesel phase. Most of the
researches on esterification of jatropha oil have been done withmethanol, being cheaper. A very few studies have been donewith ethanol despites its distinct advantages over methanol.
Ethanol is renewable in nature and it is preferable to prepare biodiesel, a renewable fuel with the use of all renewableingredients. Thus, here an attempt has been made to optimize
process variables for the ethanolysis of jatropha oil.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The jatropha seeds were purchased from M/s Raj & company, Neemuch (MP), India. The solvent extraction oil methods wereused to assess the oil content of seeds. The oil content of
jatropha seed was 32.4%. The ethanol and potassium
hydroxide was purchased from Merck. Vegetable oil containsvarious kind of fatty acid. The comparative estimation of fattyacid present in the oil used in the experiment was done using a Nucon make, 5700 series gas chromatograph.
The apparatus used for optimization of process variablesconsists of water bath, reaction flask with condenser and
digital rpm (revolution per minute) controlled mechanicalstirrer. The volume of the glass reactor was 1-liter capacity and consisted of three necks, one for stirrer, the others for
condenser and inlet of the reactants. A digital temperatureindicator was used to measure the reaction temperature. The batch reactor had a valve at the bottom for collection of the
final products. The reaction unit is kept inside a water bath inorder to maintain constant temperature. The schematic diagram
of the reactor is shown in Figure 3 The variables influencing
biodiesel production have been optimized by carrying out thefactorial design of experiment. The responses have been
measured by yields of ester and the viscosity of vegetable oil.As per the literature review and past experience of the variousresearchers, the experimental process variables can be
classified as follows:
Quantitative variables
Molar ratio of vegetable oil and alcohol Reaction temperature
Reaction time
Amount of catalyst (% wt of vegetable oil)
Settling time
Rate of agitation (Mixing intensity, rpm)
Qualitative variables
Vegetable oil
Alcohol
Purity of AlcoholIn this experimental plan, both quantitative and qualitativevariables have been analyzed for maximum biodiesel yield.
Out of above explained variables (Qualitative and Quantitativevariables) the following parameters were kept constant duringthe experiments:
Molar ratio of vegetable oil and alcohol (6:1)
Settling time (12 hrs)
Rate of agitation (500 rpm)
Figure 3 schematic diagram biodiesel reactors
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Physico-chemical properties of jatropha oil
The physico-chemical characteristics of jatropha oil such asfree fatty acid, acid value, saponification value, iodine value,unsaponifiable matters and water content were determined by
using IS:548 test methods (Table 1). The free fatty content of jatropha oil was observed to be 0.46, which is quite good fromthe view point of transesterification. However, the water
content of oil was slightly higher, thus the oils required preheating before processing.
Stirrer
rpm meters
Condenser
Temperature
indicator
Water bath
Thermocouple
Beaker
7/28/2019 Download 375
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/download-375 3/6
International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, Vol. 4, Issue, 7, pp. 1005 - 1010, July, 2013
1007
Generally, it is recommended that vegetable should have FFA
level below 1% and water content as low as possible but notexceeding 0.5% the fatty acid profile of jatropha oil are presented in Table 2.
Optimization of qualitative variables for jatropha ethyl ester (JEE)
For the maximizing the yield of jatropha ethyl eater, theexperiment was started with 100 percent pure i.e. anhydrousethanol and by varying the concentrations of catalyst (KOH) at
different levels. The selected concentration levels were 0.5,1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 weight percentage of oil. The reactiontime (60 minute), reaction temperature (60ºC), molar ratio
(6:1), mixing intensity (500 rpm) and settling time (12 hrs)were kept constant during the entire process. The catalystconcentration and purity of ethanol were optimized for jatropha ethyl ester (JEE). No separation was found by using
100% ethanol at different level of catalyst concentration from0.5 to 3.0% (Table 3). Entire mixture looked like ahomogeneous liquid for the selected settling time and evenwith increasing the settling time from 12 hrs to 72 hrs. Thus,
further study was conducted with aqueous ethanol.
By keeping aqueous ethanol (85%) constant and catalystconcentration was varied from 0.5 to 3.0% (at 0.5% slab). The
observed results are summarized in Table 4. There were noseparation found with catalyst concentration level upto 1.0%after that it was clearly observed that, the yield of JEE was
increasing with increased catalyst amount and the highest yield of 76.8% was observed at 3.0% catalyst concentration. Further the experiment was set with different aqueous ethanol. For
these sets of experiments, the catalyst concentration was keptconstant at a previously optimized level 3.0% and the purity of
ethanol was varied from 97.5% to 85% (at 2.5% slab) and theobserved results are summarized in Table 5. It was observed that, as the aqueousness of ethanol was reduced, the yield of
jatropha ethyl ester was increases and clear separation of layer was observed at some level of catalyst. The highest yield of
JEE was found with 85% aqueous ethanol with 3.0% catalystconcentration. Thus this experimental optimizationinvestigation concluded that, the ethyl ester production
required some degree of aqueous ethanol.
Influence of reaction time and temperature on the yield
and viscosity of JEEKeeping purity of ethanol constant 85%, reaction time and temperature were varied with different process chain like
JEE9, JEE10, JEE11 and JEE12. The temperature was varied from 60 to 40
ºC (at 5
ºC slab) variation and reaction time was
varied from 75 to 30 minutes (at 15 minute slab). Accordingly,
the yield and viscosity were measured. It was found that theJEE yield varied from 66.1% to 45.9% for JEE9. It was alsoclearly observed that maximum yield of 66.1% was observed
with 60ºC reaction temperature and 75 minute reaction time.
The correspondence viscosity was observed to be 5.4 cSt. Itwas observed that, for all process chains, at lower temperature
regime of 40ºC and 45
ºC, no ester yield was observed. At 50
ºC
with reaction time of 60, 45 and 30 minutes, the viscosity of JEE was not in the range of standard limits and also the lower
yield of ester was observed. However, again with 2% catalystconcentration (JEE10), it was found that maximum yield 68.4% was observed with 60ºC and 55ºC reaction temperature
and 60 minutes reaction time and correspondence viscositywas 5.4 and 6.1 cSt. It is clearly seen from the Figure 4 thatapproximately similar yields of ester were observed for the
process JEE9 and JEE10 at different catalyst concentrations.At catalyst concentration of 2.5% (JEE11), the maximum yield of ester was found 74% at 75 minute reaction time and 55ºC
reaction temperature. It is clearly seen that the yield of JEE
was increased by 10% with catalyst concentration of 2.5%compare to catalyst concentrations of 1.5% and 2.0%.
However, the corresponding viscosity values were not in anacceptable range.
Maximum yield of jatropha ethyl ester was found at 60ºC with
75 minute reaction time irrespective of catalyst concentrationfor JEE12 and corresponding viscosity 7.8 cSt, (Figure 5)which was in the acceptable range. It was thus concluded that,as the catalyst concentration increased the yield of jatrophaethyl ester (JEE) also increases with aqueous ethanol. Also, it
can be concluded that production of jatropha ethyl ester is agood choice as it reduces the input cost of raw materialresulting in reduced production cost of biodiesel apart the fact
that use of bio-ethanol makes it completely renewable fuel. In
order to further maximize the yield of JEE further experimentswere conducted with this by varying other process parameters.
Table 1 Physico-chemical properties of jatropha oil
Property Unit Jatropha oil
Free fatty acid % 0.46
Acid value mg KOH/g 0.94
Saponification value mg KOH/g 179
Unsaponifiable matter w/w percent 3.2
Iodine value g I2/100g 94
Water content ppm 667
Table 3 Effect of catalyst concentration on transesterification of jatropha oil withanhydrous ethanol
Process
Chain
Purity of
Alcohol
(%)
Catalyst
Concentration
(% wt of oil)
Reaction
Time (min)
Reaction
Temp (deg
C)
Biodiesel Yield
(% wt of oil)
JEE 1 100 0.5 60 60 NS
JEE 2 100 1.0 60 60 NS
JEE 3 100 1.5 60 60 NS
JEE 4 100 2.0 60 60 NS
JEE 5 100 2.5 60 60 NS
JEE 6 100 3.0 60 60 NS
Table 2 Fatty acid composition Jatropha oil
Fatty acid (%w/w) Jatropha oil
Palmitic acid (C16:0) 13.6
Stearic acid (C18:0) 6.2
Oleic acid (C18:1) 47.2
Linoleic acid (C18:2) 31.0
7/28/2019 Download 375
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/download-375 4/6
International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, Vol. 4, Issue, 7, pp. 1005 - 1010, July, 2013
1008
Optimization of quantitative variables for jatropha ethyl
ester (JEE)
Influence of reaction timeand temperature on the yield and viscosity of JEE
Keeping purity of ethanol constant 85%, reaction time and temperature were varied with different process chain likeJEE9, JEE10, JEE11 and JEE12. The temperature was varied
from 60 to 40ºC (at 5
ºC slab) variation and reaction time was
varied from 75 to 30 minutes (at 15 minute slab). Accordingly,the yield and viscosity were measured. It was found that theJEE yield varied from 66.1% to 45.9% for JEE9. It was alsoclearly observed that maximum yield of 66.1% was observed
with 60ºC reaction temperature and 75 minute reaction time.
The correspondence viscosity was observed to be 5.4 cSt. Itwas observed that, for all process chains, at lower temperature
regime of 40ºC and 45
ºC, no ester yield was observed. At 50
ºC
with reaction time of 60, 45 and 30 minutes, the viscosity of JEE was not in the range of standard limits and also the lower yield of ester was observed. However, again with 2% catalyst
concentration (JEE10), it was found that maximum yield 68.4% was observed with 60ºC and 55
ºC reaction temperature
and 60 minutes reaction time and correspondence viscositywas 5.4 and 6.1 cSt.
It is clearly seen from the Figure 4 that approximately similar yields of ester were observed for the process JEE9 and JEE10at different catalyst concentrations. At catalyst concentrationof 2.5% (JEE11), the maximum yield of ester was found 74%at 75 minute reaction time and 55
ºC reaction temperature. It is
clearly seen that the yield of JEE was increased by 10% with
catalyst concentration of 2.5% compare to catalystconcentrations of 1.5% and 2.0%. However, the correspondingviscosity values were not in an acceptable range.
Maximum yield of jatropha ethyl ester was found at 60ºC with
75 minute reaction time irrespective of catalyst concentration
for JEE12 and corresponding viscosity 7.8 cSt, (Figure 5)which was in the acceptable range. It was thus concluded that,as the catalyst concentration increased the yield of jatropha
ethyl ester (JEE) also increases with aqueous ethanol. Also, itcan be concluded that production of jatropha ethyl ester is a
good choice as it reduces the input cost of raw materialresulting in reduced production cost of biodiesel apart the factthat use of bio-ethanol makes it completely renewable fuel. In
order to further maximize the yield of JEE further experimentswere conducted with this by varying other process parameters.
40
45
50
55
60
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
30
45
60
75
JEE9
JEE10
JEE11
JEE12
B i o d i e s e l Y i e l d ( %
)
R e a c t i o
n T i
m e ( m
i n )
R e a c t i o n T e m p e r t u r e ( d e g C )
Figure 4 Effect of reaction time and temperature on the yield of JEE
Influence of reaction time and temperature with variation in aqueousness of ethanol on the yield and viscosity of JEE
In order to evaluate the effect of purity of ethanol on the yield
and viscosity of jatropha ethyl ester (JEE), other important process parameters viz. reaction temperature and reaction time
was varied with process chain JEE16, JEE17 and JEE18.
Five levels of reaction temperatures (60, 55, 50, 45 and 40ºC)and four levels of reaction time (75, 60, 45 and 30 minutes)
was selected as a asymmetric factorial experiments. Theobtained results are summarized in Figure 6 and Figure 7. Itwas observed that, for all process chains, at lower temperature
regime of 45ºC and 40
ºC, no ester formation was found. With
varying temperatures from 60ºC to 50
ºC the JEE yield varied
from 32.4% to 68.2% for the process chain JEE16 and the
highest yield (68.2%) was observed at 60ºC with 60 minute
reaction time. However, the corresponding viscosity was 6.9cSt. The viscosity ranged from 6.9 cSt to 9.2 cSt for the process chain JEE16 with variation of temperatures from 60
ºC
to 50ºC (with 5ºC slab) and reaction time of 75 minutes to 30
minutes (with 15 minutes slab). The results found weresymmetric but the yield was lower compared to other process
chains for JEE. For the process chain JEE17, the highest yield of ester was found at 60
ºC with 75 minute reaction time and
corresponding viscosity was observed at 7.6 cSt, which is not
Table 4 Effect of catalyst concentration on transesterification of jatropha oil with aqueous ethanol
Process
Chain
Purity of
Alcohol (%)
Catalyst Concentration
(% wt of oil))
Reaction
Time (min)
Reaction Temp
(deg C)
Biodiesel Yield
(% wt of oil)
JEE 7 85 0.5 60 60 NS
JEE 8 85 1.0 60 60 NS
JEE 9 85 1.5 60 60 58.2
JEE 10 85 2.0 60 60 68.4
JEE 11 85 2.5 60 60 72.1
JEE 12 85 3.0 60 60 76.8
Table 5 Effect of purity of ethanol on transesterification of jatropha oil
Process
Chain
Purity of
Alcohol (%)
Catalyst Concentration
(% wt of oil)
Reaction
Time (min)
Reaction Temp
(deg C)
Biodiesel Yield
(% wt of oil)
JEE 13 97.5 3.0 60 60 NSJEE 14 95 3.0 60 60 50.4
JEE 15 92.5 3.0 60 60 53.2
JEE 16 90 3.0 60 60 66.3
JEE 17 87.5 3.0 60 60 71.2
JEE 18 85 3.0 60 60 76.8
7/28/2019 Download 375
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/download-375 5/6
International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, Vol. 4, Issue, 7, pp. 1005 - 1010, July, 2013
1009
60
55
50
45
40
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
75
60
45
30
JEE9
JEE10
JEE11
JEE12
V i s c o s i t y ( c S t )
R e a c t i o
n T i
m e ( m
i n )
R e a c t i o n T e m p e r t u r e ( d e g C )
Figure 5 Effect of reaction time and temperature on the viscosity of JEE
In the acceptable range. But, for process chain JEE18, the
highest yield of 82.3% was found with 75 minute reaction timeat 60ºC and corresponding viscosity observed was 5.3 cSt,
which is lower than process chain JEE16 and JEE17.
60
55
50
45
40
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
75
60
45
30
JEE16
JEE17
JEE18
B i o d
i e s e l Y i e l d ( % )
R e a c t i o
n T i
m e (
m i n )
R e a c t i o n T e m p e r t u r e ( d e g C )
Figure 6 Effect of reaction time and temperature on the yield of JEE with
variation in purity of ethanol
60
55
50
45
40
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
75
60
45
30
JEE16
JEE17
JEE18
V i s c o s i t y ( c S t )
R e a c t i o
n T i
m e (
m i n )
R e a c t i o n T e m p e r t u r e ( d e g C )
Figure 7 Effect of reaction time and temperature on the viscosity of JEE with
variation of catalyst concentration and aqueous ethanol
The highest yield (82.3%) of process chain JEE18 wasapproximately 20% higher than compared to process chain
JEE16 and JEE17. It is seen that in respect of viscosity and yield of ester, the results are very much symmetrical for the allthe process chains. It has also been seen that with increasing
the aqueousness of ethanol the yield of jatropha ethyl ester wasalso increasing. Thus the recommended process parameters for the production of jatropha ethyl ester (JEE) can be summarized
as reaction time of 75 minute, reaction temperature of 60ºC,molar ration of 6:1, and catalyst concentration of 3.0% with85% ethanol purity. The observed results also indicate that, for
higher aqueousness ethanol, the biodiesel quality is very good compare to lower aqueousness of ethanol.
CONCLUSIONS
No ester separation was found by using 100% ethanol atdifferent level of catalyst concentrations from 0.5 to 3.0% and
similarly at lower temperature regimes of 45ºC and 40
ºC. With
varying temperatures from 60ºC to 50
ºC the yield was varied
from 32.4% to 68.2%. For the process chain JEE17, thehighest yield of ester was found at 60
ºC with 75 minute
reaction time and corresponding viscosity was observed 7.6cSt, which is not in acceptable range. But, for process chain
JEE18, the highest yield 82.3% was found with 75 minutereaction time at 60
ºC and corresponding viscosity 5.3 cSt,
which is lower than process chain JEE16 and JEE17. The
highest yield (82.3%) of process chain JEE18 wasapproximately 20% higher than compare to process chainJEE16 and JEE17. It is seen that in respect of viscosity and
yield of ester, the results are very much symmetrical for the allthe process chains. It is also observed that with increasing the purity of ethanol the yield of jatropha ethyl ester was also
increasing. The recommended process parameters for the
production of jatropha ethyl ester (JEE) are: reaction time75 minute, reaction temperature 60ºC, molar ration 6:1, and
catalyst concentration 3.0% with ethanol purity 85%. Theobserved results also indicate that, for higher degree of proof of ethanol, the biodiesel quality is very good compare to lower
proof of ethanol.
References
Canakci, M. and Van Gerpen, J. 1999. Biodiesel production viaacid catalyst. Transactions of the ASAE , 42 (5) : 1203-1210.
Canakci, M., Gerpen, J.V., 2001. Biodiesel production from oils
and fats with high free fatty acids. Trans. ASAE 44 (6), 1429-1436.
Dasari, M.A., Goff, M.J., Suppes, G.J., 2003. Non-catalyticalcoholysis kinetics of soybean oil. J. Am Oil Chem. Soc. 80(2), 189-192
Encinar, J.M., Gonzalez, J.F., Rodriguez, J.J., Tajedor, A., 2002.Biodiesel fuel from vegetable oils: Transesterification of
Cynara cardunculuc L. oil with ethanol. Energy Fuel 16 (3),443-450.
Goff, M.J., Bauer, N.S., Lopes, S., Sutterlin, W.R., Suppes, G.J.,2004. Acid catalyzed alcoholysis of soybean oil. J. Am. OilChem. Soc. 81 (1), 415-420.
Knothe, G., 2002b. Structure indices in FA chemistry. Howrelavent is the iodine value? J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 79 (9),847-854.
Kusdiana, D., Saka, S., 2001. Methyl esterification of free fattyacids of rapeseed oil as treated in supercritical methanol. J.Chem. Eng. Japan 34 (3), 383-387.
7/28/2019 Download 375
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/download-375 6/6
International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, Vol. 4, Issue, 7, pp. 1005 - 1010, July, 2013
1010
Meher, L. C.; Naik, S. N. and Das, L. M.2004. Methanolysis of
Pongamia pinnata (Karanja) oil for production of biodiesel. Journal Scientific and Industrial Research, 63, 913-929.
Michael S. G. and Robert, L.M., 1998. Combustion of fat and vegetable oil derived fuels in diesel engines. Prog. Energy
combust. Sci., Vol,24, pp125-164.Otera, J., 1993. Transesterification. Chem. Rev. 93 (4), 1449-
1470.
Planning Commission Report, 2003. National mission on biofuels.Published by Ministry of planning commission, Govt of India.
Saka, S., Kusdiana, D., 2001. Biodiesel fuel from rapeseed oil as
prepared in supercritical methanol. Fuel 80 (2), 225-231.Srivastava A, Prasad R. 2000. Triglycerides-based diesel fuel.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Vol 4, 111-133.
Toda, T., Honda, H., Fukumura, T., Sibasaki-Kitakawa, N.,Yonemoto, T., 2004. Novel production method of biodiesel
fuel using anion exchange resin as a heterogeneous catalyst.10
thAsian Pacific Confederation of Chemical Eng. Congress
2004, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Warabi, Y., Kusdiana, D., Sakam, S., 2004. Reactivity of triglycerides and fatty acids of rapeseed oil in supercriticalalcohols. Bioresource Technol. 91 (3), 283-287.
Yamazaki, R., Iwamoto, S., Nabetani, H., Osakada, K.,Miyawaki, O., Sagara, Y., 2004. Biodiesel fuel production bynon-catalytic alcoholysis of oils. 10th Asian Pacific
Confederation of Chemical Eng. Congress 2004, Kitakyushu,Japan.
*******