Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment
DONOR CHARTS
March 2020
Statistics based on DAC Members’ reporting on the Gender Equality Policy Marker, 2017-2018
Creditor Reporting System database
REVISED VERSION
DEFINITION
THE GENDER EQUALITY POLICY MARKER
DEFINITION
An activity should be classified as gender equality focused (score Principal or Significant) if:
It is intended to advance gender equality and women’s empowerment or reduce discrimination and inequalities based on sex.
CRITERIA FOR ELIGIBILITY Gender equality is explicitly promoted in activity documentation through specific measures which:
a) Reduce social, economic or political power inequalities between women and men, girls and boys, ensure that women benefit equally with men from the activity, or compensate for past discrimination; or
b) Develop or strengthen gender equality or anti-discrimination policies, legislation or institutions.
This approach requires analysing gender inequalities either separately or as an integral part of agencies’ standard procedures.
EXAMPLES OF TYPICAL ACTIVITIES
Examples of activities that could be marked as principal objective:
-- legal literacy for women and girls; -- male networks against gender violence; -- a social safety net project which focuses specifically on assisting women and girls as a particularly disadvantaged group in a society; -- capacity building of Ministries of Finance and Planning to incorporate gender equality objectives in national poverty reduction or comparable strategies.
Such activities can target women specifically, men specifically or both women and men. Examples of activities that could be marked as significant
objective:
-- activity which has as its principal objective to provide drinking water to a district or community while at the same time ensuring that women and girls have safe and easy access to the facilities; -- a social safety net project which focuses on the community as a whole and ensures that women and girls benefit equally with men and boys.
N.B. Support to women’s equality organisations and institutions (CRS sector code 15170) scores, by definition, principal objective.
OVERVIEW
Gender Equality Focus of DAC Members’ Aid by Sector Average annual value of commitments in 2017-2018
constant 2017 USD 48.7 billion
Coverage – All DAC members, except one, report on the gender equality focus of their aid. As from 2010 data, the calculation of allocable aid is no longer based on sectors but on types of aid. This new methodology slightly extends the scope of aid screened, mainly with the inclusion of humanitarian aid. The calculation includes the following types of aid: sector budget support, core support to NGOs, support to specific funds managed by international organisations, pooled funding, projects, donor country personnel and other technical assistance, and scholarships in donor country. The term bilateral allocable aid in this publication refers to this methodology.
These charts are based on commitment data, which best reflect current policies by donors. A two-year average is given, as the focus and volume of commitments vary from year to year. DAC members use a ‘marker’ to identify activities that have gender equality as a principal or significant objective. Reporting has strongly improved over the years, and although some members encounter difficulties in applying the methodology, the currently available data nevertheless give a reliable indication of the extent to which those donors that report address gender equality in their aid programmes.
10%
6%
7%
4%
19%
4%
2%
2%
13%
11%
2%
3%
7%
10%
Education
Health
Population Pol./Progr. & Reproductive Health
Water Supply & Sanitation
Government & Civil Society, incl. Conflict Prevention
Other Social Infrastructure & Services
Other Economic Infrastrustures & Services
Energy
Business, Banking &Financial Services
Agriculture & Rural Development
Other Multisector
General Environment Protection
Industry, Mining,Construction, Trade &
TourimUSD
48.7 bn
Humanitarian Aid
AID AT A GLANCE - DONORS' CHARTS
The following charts (2017-2018 average) summarise statistics on aid focused on gender equality and women’s empowerment extended by each DAC member. Information shown includes the gender equality policy marker coverage, the top ten recipients and a sector breakdown of aid focused on gender equality and women’s empowerment.
Charts are not shown for Hungary.
Guidance for the interpretation of the charts: The first element to take into account when analysing the data for one country or when comparing data between countries is the COVERAGE RATIO, i.e. the proportion of aid which is screened. A high percentage of gender equality focused aid ALONE does not mean that aid is well aligned with the gender equality policy objective, such a conclusion would only be valid for a donor with 100% coverage. When comparing data between donors, both coverage ratio and % of aid focused on gender equality and women’s empowerment have to be considered. (A number of members do not screen contributions that are by nature likely to fall under the “not targeted” category, e.g. imputed student costs. Therefore, a high amount in the category “not screened” generally increases the percentage of gender equality focused aid significantly.)
Percentage of ODA focused on gender equality in Bilateral Allocable Aid 2017-2018 average
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
%
Principal Significant
Aid in support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment, 2017-2018 average (2017 USD million)
Note: An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and fundamental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened for promoting gender equality, but was found to not target it.
Principal Significant
Sub-Total:
Gender
Equality
focused
as % of aid
screenedNot targeted
Total:
aid screenedNot screened
Bilateral
allocable, total
a b c = a + b c / e d e = c + d f
Australia 317 892 1,208 53 1,085 2,294 10 2,304 22 25
Austria 10 109 119 45 146 265 19 284 4 2
Belgium 34 404 438 59 310 748 46 794 1 10
Canada 373 1,741 2,114 90 230 2,345 46 2,391 75 77
Czech Republic 3 18 21 49 21 42 18 60 0 0
Denmark 124 430 554 39 869 1,424 75 1,498 4 1
EU Institutions 597 9,652 10,249 56 8,186 18,435 2,256 20,692 59 152
Finland 50 268 319 60 212 531 0 531 10 7
France 167 1,553 1,721 26 4,839 6,560 495 7,055 1 1
Germany 264 6,710 6,974 40 10,632 17,606 107 17,713 39 9
Greece 0 4 4 35 7 10 14 24 0 0
Hungary (*) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 77 0 0
Iceland 4 20 23 85 4 28 0 28 2 0
Ireland 47 286 334 82 72 406 10 415 6 12
Italy 55 508 563 57 426 989 290 1,279 10 4
Japan 137 8,361 8,498 50 8,498 16,997 1,239 18,236 36 5
Korea 52 303 355 15 2,089 2,444 47 2,491 3 2
Luxembourg 14 74 88 30 205 293 0 293 3 1
Netherlands 284 1,141 1,425 60 942 2,367 0 2,367 26 4
New Zealand 5 166 171 48 183 353 0 353 0 0
Norway 127 793 920 30 2,186 3,106 0 3,106 40 29
Poland 1 2 4 2 162 165 0 165 0 0
Portugal 2 33 35 29 84 119 0 119 0 0
Slovak Republic 0 13 13 45 17 30 1 31 0 0
Slovenia 1 3 4 58 3 7 6 13 0 0
Spain 167 213 380 56 303 683 1 684 34 28
Sweden 553 2,005 2,558 87 383 2,941 24 2,965 51 46
Switzerland 91 950 1,040 55 854 1,895 277 2,172 7 10
United Kingdom 170 2,822 2,992 46 3,503 6,495 86 6,581 31 19
United States 930 4,688 5,618 21 21,422 27,040 0 27,040 5 3
Total DAC members 4,578 44,163 48,741 42 67,876 116,617 5,069 121,762 469 446
Support to
women's equality
organisations
and institutions
both included in (a)
Ending
violence
against
women and
girls
Australia
2017 2018
Principal objective 241 392
Significant objective 867 917
Not targeted 1,126 1,045
Not screened 0 21
Total bilateral allocable aid 2,235 2,374
Gender equality focused aid (3) 50% 56%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 178 203
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 29 15
- Ending violence against women 24 26
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 11 6
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Papua New Guinea 402 401 49%
Indonesia 237 232 69%
Solomon Islands 117 117 56%
Afghanistan 68 68 50%
Timor-Leste 64 64 60%
Myanmar 59 59 76%
Cambodia 55 55 30%
Philippines 54 54 50%
Bangladesh 51 51 74%
Fiji 47 47 67%
Papua New Guinea 401 195 49%
Indonesia 232 160 69%
Solomon Islands 117 66 56%
Myanmar 59 45 76%
Timor-Leste 64 38 60%
Bangladesh 51 38 74%
Afghanistan 68 34 50%
Fiji 47 32 67%
Pakistan 43 28 66%
Philippines 54 27 50%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
200
400
600
800
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
0
500
1,000
1,500
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Austria
2017 2018
Principal objective 8 12
Significant objective 108 110
Not targeted 172 119
Not screened 26 12
Total bilateral allocable aid 314 253
Gender equality focused aid (3) 40% 51%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 324 225
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 2 5
- Ending violence against women 1 3
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Turkey 38 22 50%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 21 1 51%
Ukraine 18 8 54%
Ethiopia 14 13 81%
Uganda 13 13 70%
Serbia 12 1 84%
Iran 11 0 8%
Cuba 11 0 55%
Albania 9 6 46%
Sri Lanka 9 9 1%
Ethiopia 13 11 81%
Uganda 13 9 70%
Georgia 7 5 65%
Myanmar 7 5 70%
Iraq 6 4 71%
Ukraine 8 4 54%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 5 4 80%
Kosovo 5 4 77%
Burkina Faso 5 4 76%
Moldova 4 3 89%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 93%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
20
40
60
80
100
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
0
25
50
75
100
125
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Belgium
2017 2018
Principal objective 30 38
Significant objective 483 325
Not targeted 346 274
Not screened 0 93
Total bilateral allocable aid 858 730
Gender equality focused aid (3) 60% 57%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 624 371
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0 2
- Ending violence against women 3 17
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 18 2
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Democratic Republic of the Congo 99 99 57%
Niger 30 30 92%
Mali 20 20 98%
Burundi 19 19 68%
Rwanda 18 18 33%
Mozambique 18 18 53%
Burkina Faso 17 17 71%
Benin 17 17 83%
Kenya 17 17 4%
Peru 14 14 66%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 99 55 57%
Niger 30 27 92%
Mali 20 20 98%
Benin 17 14 83%
Burundi 19 13 68%
Burkina Faso 17 12 71%
Syrian Arab Republic 13 11 94%
Uganda 14 11 81%
Mozambique 18 9 53%
Peru 14 9 66%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 94%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2007-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Canada
2017 2018
Principal objective 289 457
Significant objective 1,665 1,817
Not targeted 297 163
Not screened 0 92
Total bilateral allocable aid 2,251 2,530
Gender equality focused aid (3) 87% 93%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 446 721
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 3 147
- Ending violence against women 78 76
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 5 3
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Haiti 184 184 94%
Afghanistan 154 154 100%
Mozambique 125 121 99%
Bangladesh 100 100 99%
Jordan 86 86 94%
Nigeria 56 56 99%
Ethiopia 54 53 98%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 53 53 99%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 49 49 99%
South Sudan 44 44 96%
Haiti 184 172 94%
Afghanistan 154 153 100%
Mozambique 121 120 99%
Bangladesh 100 98 99%
Jordan 86 81 94%
Nigeria 56 55 99%
Ethiopia 53 52 98%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 53 52 99%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 49 48 99%
South Sudan 44 42 96%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 98%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Czech Republic
2017 2018
Principal objective 4 2
Significant objective 24 11
Not targeted 11 32
Not screened 17 20
Total bilateral allocable aid 56 65
Gender equality focused aid (3) 71% 30%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 27 29
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0.14 0.02
- Ending violence against women 0 0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0.02 0
Bosnia and Herzegovina 4.9 4.9 21%
Moldova 4.5 4.5 31%
Ethiopia 4.2 4.2 60%
Georgia 3.7 3.7 58%
Ukraine 3.2 3.2 50%
Jordan 2.9 2.9 10%
Turkey 2.4 2.4 0%
Iraq 2.4 2.4 70%
Syrian Arab Republic 2.3 2.1 82%
Afghanistan 2.1 2.1 82%
Ethiopia 4.2 2.3 60%
Georgia 3.7 1.9 58%
Moldova 4.5 1.3 31%
Ukraine 3.2 1.2 50%
Afghanistan 2.1 1.1 82%
Syrian Arab Republic 2.1 1.0 82%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 4.9 1.0 21%
Iraq 2.4 0.8 70%
Zambia 1.7 0.8 50%
Libya 0.7 0.6 85%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 69%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
5
10
15
20
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
0
10
20
30
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Denmark
2017 2018
Principal objective 122 127
Significant objective 389 471
Not targeted 879 860
Not screened 111 38
Total bilateral allocable aid 1,500 1,496
Gender equality focused aid (3) 37% 41%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 40 81
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 4 3
- Ending violence against women 0 1
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 9 9
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Syrian Arab Republic 70 70 1%
Mali 66 66 33%
Afghanistan 65 65 51%
Burkina Faso 49 35 100%
Uganda 46 46 63%
Ethiopia 46 46 96%
Bangladesh 45 45 69%
Myanmar 34 34 60%
Yemen 34 34 0%
Mozambique 28 28 54%
Ethiopia 46 43 96%
Burkina Faso 35 35 100%
Afghanistan 65 33 51%
Bangladesh 45 31 69%
Uganda 46 29 63%
Niger 23 23 100%
Mali 66 22 33%
Myanmar 34 18 60%
Tanzania 17 15 94%
Mozambique 28 15 54%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 95%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
100
200
300
400
500
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
0
200
400
600
800
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
EU Institutions
2017 2018
Principal objective 536 658
Significant objective 10,153 9,151
Not targeted 10,625 5,747
Not screened 0 4,512
Total bilateral allocable aid 21,315 20,068
Gender equality focused aid (3) 50% 63%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,449 1,541
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 101 17
- Ending violence against women 28 277
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Turkey 2,716 2,716 48%
Serbia 593 593 34%
Tunisia 580 580 34%
Syrian Arab Republic 547 547 23%
Morocco 493 460 27%
India 382 382 0%
Ukraine 347 347 62%
Afghanistan 336 215 96%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 316 316 83%
Bangladesh 270 270 80%
Turkey 2,716 1,018 48%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 316 260 83%
Bangladesh 270 211 80%
Afghanistan 215 206 96%
Somalia 252 199 79%
Ukraine 347 195 62%
Myanmar 182 176 96%
Tunisia 580 154 34%
Kosovo 194 151 78%
Cambodia 152 139 91%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 89%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Finland
2017 2018
Principal objective 38 63
Significant objective 276 260
Not targeted 204 220
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 518 544
Gender equality focused aid (3) 61% 59%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 125 116
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 6 13
- Ending violence against women 0 14
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 23 0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Afghanistan 27 25 94%
Somalia 24 24 47%
Kenya 21 20 85%
Tanzania 21 20 56%
Turkey 20 20 100%
Ethiopia 19 18 89%
Mozambique 14 13 97%
Myanmar 14 13 83%
Indonesia 12 12 4%
Ukraine 12 12 1%
Afghanistan 25 24 94%
Turkey 20 20 100%
Kenya 20 17 85%
Ethiopia 18 16 89%
Mozambique 13 13 97%
Myanmar 13 11 83%
Tanzania 20 11 56%
Somalia 24 11 47%
Nepal 10 9 83%
Zambia 7 6 88%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
100
200
300
400
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
France
2017 2018
Principal objective 276 59
Significant objective 1,970 1,136
Not targeted 4,565 5,114
Not screened 970 19
Total bilateral allocable aid 7,781 6,329
Gender equality focused aid (3) 33% 19%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 2,906 2,662
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0 2
- Ending violence against women 2 0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 1 1
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Morocco 471 357 44%
Côte d'Ivoire 439 417 3%
Indonesia 346 340 1%
Tunisia 339 294 35%
Senegal 288 250 26%
Iraq 270 25 52%
Colombia 255 239 52%
China (People's Republic of) 246 148 35%
India 245 231 3%
Cameroon 221 91 16%
Morocco 357 154 44%
Angola 128 127 99%
Colombia 239 124 52%
Tunisia 294 101 35%
Nigeria 176 89 51%
Senegal 250 62 26%
Philippines 60 58 97%
China (People's Republic of) 148 51 35%
Dominican Republic 51 50 99%
Niger 91 49 55%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 93%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2007-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Germany
2017 2018
Principal objective 201 327
Significant objective 6,696 6,724
Not targeted 10,714 10,550
Not screened 106 109
Total bilateral allocable aid 17,717 17,709
Gender equality focused aid (3) 39% 40%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 8,347 5,957
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 34 44
- Ending violence against women 8 10
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 5 4
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Indonesia 1,073 1,037 5%
India 1,039 918 11%
Syrian Arab Republic 825 756 12%
Iraq 696 690 42%
China (People's Republic of) 695 450 5%
Morocco 513 485 14%
Jordan 513 452 38%
Afghanistan 464 459 69%
Colombia 411 392 69%
Tunisia 401 364 10%
Afghanistan 459 316 69%
Iraq 690 291 42%
Colombia 392 271 69%
Lebanon 265 208 78%
Turkey 230 183 80%
Jordan 452 172 38%
Ethiopia 174 128 74%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 171 121 71%
Somalia 210 114 54%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 169 104 62%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 99%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Greece
2017 2018
Principal objective 0 0
Significant objective 3 4
Not targeted 13 0
Not screened 0 28
Total bilateral allocable aid 17 32
Gender equality focused aid (3) 21% 98%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 68 34
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0 0
- Ending violence against women 0 0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 0.4
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Turkey 20.5 20.5 4%
Albania 1.2 1.2 100%
Egypt 0.3 0.3 100%
Ukraine 0.3 0.3 100%
Tunisia 0.2 0.2 100%
Serbia 0.2 0.2 100%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.2 0.2 98%
Syrian Arab Republic 0.2 0.2 4%
Lebanon 0.1 0.1 100%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 0.1 0.1 100%
Albania 1.2 1.2 100%
Egypt 0.3 0.3 100%
Ukraine 0.3 0.3 100%
Turkey 20.5 0.2 4%
Tunisia 0.2 0.2 100%
Serbia 0.2 0.2 100%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.2 0.2 98%
Lebanon 0.1 0.1 100%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 0.1 0.1 100%
Algeria 0.1 0.1 100%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 42%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
5
10
15
20
25
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
0
20
40
60
80
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Iceland
2017 2018
Principal objective 4 3
Significant objective 18 21
Not targeted 6 2
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 29 27
Gender equality focused aid (3) 79% 92%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 26 15
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 2 3
- Ending violence against women 0.4 0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 1 1
Uganda 4.6 4.6 97%
Malawi 4.4 4.4 96%
Mozambique 2.9 2.9 98%
Syrian Arab Republic 1.4 1.4 82%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.8 0.8 68%
Lebanon 0.7 0.7 70%
Liberia 0.5 0.5 100%
Sierra Leone 0.5 0.5 100%
Ethiopia 0.4 0.4 100%
Jordan 0.3 0.3 100%
Uganda 4.6 4.4 97%
Malawi 4.4 4.2 96%
Mozambique 2.9 2.8 98%
Syrian Arab Republic 1.4 1.1 82%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.8 0.6 68%
Lebanon 0.7 0.5 70%
Liberia 0.5 0.5 100%
Sierra Leone 0.5 0.5 100%
Ethiopia 0.4 0.4 100%
Jordan 0.3 0.3 100%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Ireland
2017 2018
Principal objective 65 30
Significant objective 281 292
Not targeted 51 92
Not screened 18 1
Total bilateral allocable aid 416 415
Gender equality focused aid (3) 87% 78%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 77 91
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 6 6
- Ending violence against women 10 13
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 2 2
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Ethiopia 41 40 83%
Uganda 29 28 87%
Mozambique 26 25 81%
Tanzania 25 24 88%
Malawi 23 22 92%
Sierra Leone 14 13 87%
South Sudan 12 12 83%
Turkey 10 10 11%
Zambia 10 10 90%
Viet Nam 10 10 91%
Ethiopia 40 33 83%
Uganda 28 24 87%
Tanzania 24 21 88%
Malawi 22 20 92%
Mozambique 25 20 81%
Sierra Leone 13 11 87%
South Sudan 12 9 83%
Viet Nam 10 9 91%
Zambia 10 9 90%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 10 8 87%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 98%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
25%
50%
75%
0
100
200
300
2007-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Italy
2017 2018
Principal objective 57 54
Significant objective 597 418
Not targeted 491 361
Not screened 332 248
Total bilateral allocable aid 1,478 1,081
Gender equality focused aid (3) 57% 57%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,951 1,116
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 7 12
- Ending violence against women 4 3
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 2 2
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Afghanistan 105 104 26%
Turkey 84 84 7%
Mozambique 73 72 87%
Iraq 66 66 14%
Ethiopia 55 55 86%
Niger 50 50 38%
Cuba 48 2 64%
Tunisia 45 44 85%
Libya 41 41 96%
Lebanon 33 32 58%
Mozambique 72 62 87%
Ethiopia 55 46 86%
Tunisia 44 37 85%
Argentina 26 24 92%
Sudan 25 23 98%
Afghanistan 104 20 26%
Lebanon 32 18 58%
Libya 41 17 96%
Senegal 19 17 91%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 22 15 69%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 77%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
100
200
300
400
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2007-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Japan
2017 2018
Principal objective 113 161
Significant objective 5,886 10,837
Not targeted 11,248 5,748
Not screened 1,251 1,228
Total bilateral allocable aid 18,498 17,974
Gender equality focused aid (3) 35% 66%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,678 1,042
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 14 58
- Ending violence against women 1 9
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 5
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
India 5,451 5,277 68%
Bangladesh 1,821 1,821 57%
Myanmar 1,423 1,423 48%
Indonesia 1,321 1,321 88%
Philippines 1,017 1,017 66%
Iraq 582 448 27%
Viet Nam 470 421 44%
Cambodia 328 328 18%
Bolivia 310 310 1%
Sri Lanka 293 293 89%
India 5,277 3,522 68%
Indonesia 1,321 1,132 88%
Bangladesh 1,821 1,031 57%
Myanmar 1,423 666 48%
Philippines 1,017 642 66%
Sri Lanka 293 251 89%
Viet Nam 421 171 44%
Iraq 448 119 27%
Afghanistan 199 88 46%
Cambodia 328 56 18%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 93%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Korea
2017 2018
Principal objective 45 58
Significant objective 208 397
Not targeted 2,087 2,091
Not screened 0 94
Total bilateral allocable aid 2,340 2,641
Gender equality focused aid (3) 11% 18%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 104 111
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 2 4
- Ending violence against women 3 0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 5 5
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Ethiopia 162 162 31%
Myanmar 160 160 2%
Egypt 139 139 0%
Sri Lanka 138 138 3%
Philippines 136 136 3%
Mongolia 134 134 1%
Viet Nam 121 121 1%
Bangladesh 120 120 19%
Cambodia 97 97 33%
Lao People's Democratic Republic 82 82 4%
Senegal 62 50 81%
Ethiopia 162 49 31%
Ghana 57 47 83%
Cambodia 97 31 33%
Colombia 33 27 84%
Bangladesh 120 23 19%
Bolivia 67 18 28%
Solomon Islands 17 16 94%
Nicaragua 76 12 15%
Uganda 20 7 36%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 98%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
0
100
200
300
400
2007-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Luxembourg
2017 2018
Principal objective 15 12
Significant objective 65 83
Not targeted 202 209
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 283 304
Gender equality focused aid (3) 29% 31%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 24 23
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 4 3
- Ending violence against women 1 2
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 1 1
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Niger 35 32 79%
Burkina Faso 24 22 42%
Lao People's Democratic Republic 23 21 35%
Mali 21 19 55%
Senegal 17 15 62%
Cabo Verde 12 11 39%
Nicaragua 11 10 89%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 9 9 1%
Kosovo 8 7 22%
Syrian Arab Republic 5 5 4%
Niger 32 25 79%
Mali 19 11 55%
Senegal 15 9 62%
Burkina Faso 22 9 42%
Nicaragua 10 9 89%
Lao People's Democratic Republic 21 7 35%
Cabo Verde 11 4 39%
Viet Nam 4 3 67%
Kosovo 7 2 22%
Nepal 3 1 29%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
20
40
60
80
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
0
20
40
60
80
100
2009-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Netherlands
2017 2018
Principal objective 243 324
Significant objective 1,129 1,154
Not targeted 789 1,096
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 2,161 2,574
Gender equality focused aid (3) 64% 57%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,297 877
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 24 28
- Ending violence against women 6 3
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 9
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Afghanistan 64 64 74%
South Sudan 61 61 58%
Ethiopia 60 60 38%
Mozambique 53 53 53%
Bangladesh 48 48 79%
Rwanda 47 47 9%
Benin 44 44 95%
Yemen 43 43 90%
Lebanon 42 42 66%
Mali 38 38 51%
Afghanistan 64 48 74%
Benin 44 42 95%
Yemen 43 38 90%
Bangladesh 48 38 79%
South Sudan 61 36 58%
Syrian Arab Republic 37 34 92%
Mozambique 53 28 53%
Lebanon 42 28 66%
Ethiopia 60 22 38%
Ghana 24 21 88%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
200
400
600
800
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
New Zealand
2017 2018
Principal objective 4 6
Significant objective 171 160
Not targeted 193 172
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 369 338
Gender equality focused aid (3) 48% 49%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 87 89
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 1 0
- Ending violence against women 0 0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 2 0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Papua New Guinea 29 29 85%
Tokelau 29 16 8%
Vanuatu 21 21 79%
Samoa 21 19 82%
Solomon Islands 21 21 60%
Tonga 18 18 52%
Indonesia 18 18 44%
Niue 16 10 22%
Myanmar 15 15 40%
Fiji 14 14 26%
Papua New Guinea 29 24 85%
Vanuatu 21 17 79%
Samoa 19 15 82%
Solomon Islands 21 12 60%
Tonga 18 9 52%
Indonesia 18 8 44%
Kiribati 11 6 54%
Myanmar 15 6 40%
Timor-Leste 6 6 95%
Fiji 14 4 26%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
20
40
60
80
100
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
10%
30%
50%
70%
90%
0
50
100
150
200
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Norway
2017 2018
Principal objective 101 154
Significant objective 514 1,071
Not targeted 2,247 2,125
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 2,862 3,349
Gender equality focused aid (3) 21% 37%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 646 309
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 42 37
- Ending violence against women 21 36
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 9 10
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Ethiopia 132 132 19%
Syrian Arab Republic 126 126 29%
Somalia 81 81 31%
Afghanistan 77 76 32%
South Sudan 72 72 16%
Colombia 69 69 23%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 69 69 13%
Brazil 67 67 5%
Lebanon 64 64 19%
Malawi 61 61 37%
Syrian Arab Republic 126 37 29%
Somalia 81 25 31%
Ethiopia 132 24 19%
Afghanistan 76 24 32%
Malawi 61 22 37%
Mozambique 52 18 35%
Nepal 26 17 67%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 32 17 52%
Colombia 69 16 23%
Uganda 35 16 45%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
250
500
750
1,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
0
250
500
750
1,000
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Poland
2017 2018
Principal objective 1 1
Significant objective 2 3
Not targeted 163 160
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 167 163
Gender equality focused aid (3) 2% 2%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 82 90
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0.07 0
- Ending violence against women 0.21 0.14
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 0.04
Ukraine 63 14 2%
Belarus 33 15 2%
Myanmar 29 29 1%
Turkey 22 21 0%
Tanzania 16 16 3%
Lebanon 5 5 3%
Kenya 5 5 9%
Ethiopia 4 4 2%
Syrian Arab Republic 4 4 0%
Iraq 3 3 9%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 1 0.5 38%
Kenya 5 0.4 9%
Tanzania 16 0.4 3%
Jordan 2 0.3 15%
Ukraine 14 0.3 2%
Belarus 15 0.3 2%
Iraq 3 0.3 9%
Georgia 2 0.3 14%
Myanmar 29 0.2 1%
Lebanon 5 0.2 3%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
20
40
60
80
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
0
1
2
3
4
5
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Portugal
2017 2018
Principal objective 2 2
Significant objective 34 33
Not targeted 80 88
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 116 122
Gender equality focused aid (3) 31% 28%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 30 35
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0.1 0.2
- Ending violence against women 0.1 0.01
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Mozambique 27 24 40%
Cabo Verde 25 18 15%
Timor-Leste 15 13 77%
Sao Tome and Principe 13 11 42%
Guinea-Bissau 11 8 39%
Syrian Arab Republic 9 9 0%
Angola 5 4 48%
Morocco 4 4 0%
Brazil 3 3 1%
Afghanistan 1 1 0%
Timor-Leste 13 10 77%
Mozambique 24 10 40%
Sao Tome and Principe 11 5 42%
Guinea-Bissau 8 3 39%
Cabo Verde 18 3 15%
Angola 4 2 48%
China (People's Republic of) 0.7 0.4 57%
Colombia 0.7 0.2 29%
Kosovo 0.2 0.2 100%
Georgia 0.1 0.1 51%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
10
20
30
40
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
6%
12%
18%
24%
30%
0
10
20
30
40
50
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Slovak Republic
2017 2018
Principal objective 0 0
Significant objective 13 14
Not targeted 20 14
Not screened 1 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 34 28
Gender equality focused aid (3) 39% 51%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 4 3
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0.2 0.01
- Ending violence against women 0 0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0.1 0.1
Kenya 1.7 1.7 29%
Ukraine 1.5 1.5 0%
Serbia 1.2 1.2 0%
South Sudan 0.9 0.9 13%
Moldova 0.9 0.9 0%
Montenegro 0.7 0.7 0%
Georgia 0.7 0.7 8%
Syrian Arab Republic 0.7 0.6 18%
Afghanistan 0.6 0.6 2%
Iraq 0.6 0.6 20%
Kenya 1.7 0.5 29%
Lebanon 0.4 0.2 56%
Syrian Arab Republic 0.6 0.1 18%
Iraq 0.6 0.1 20%
South Sudan 0.9 0.1 13%
Kosovo 0.1 0.1 47%
Georgia 0.7 0.1 8%
Afghanistan 0.6 0.0 2%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.1 0.0 9%
Albania 0.3 0.0 2%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 98%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
2
4
6
8
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
0
5
10
15
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Slovenia
2017 2018
Principal objective 1 1
Significant objective 2 4
Not targeted 3 3
Not screened 3 9
Total bilateral allocable aid 9 17
Gender equality focused aid (3) 51% 62%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 14 16
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 0.5 0
- Ending violence against women 0 0
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0.01 0.02
Bosnia and Herzegovina 4.6 1.2 37%
North Macedonia 4.1 0.9 23%
Serbia 3.5 1.6 15%
Ukraine 1.9 1.9 0%
Montenegro 1.7 1.2 21%
Kosovo 1.5 0.9 63%
Turkey 1.5 1.5 100%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.6 0.6 100%
Rwanda 0.2 0.2 100%
Jordan 0.2 0.2 100%
Turkey 1.5 1.5 100%
Kosovo 0.9 0.5 63%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 0.6 0.2 100%
Rwanda 0.2 0.2 100%
Jordan 0.2 0.2 100%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.2 0.2 37%
Albania 0.2 0.1 99%
Montenegro 1.2 0.1 21%
North Macedonia 0.9 0.1 23%
Egypt 0.1 0.1 100%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 53%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
2017-2018 (1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
2
4
6
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Spain
2017 2018
Principal objective 104 229
Significant objective 214 212
Not targeted 336 271
Not screened 0 1
Total bilateral allocable aid 654 713
Gender equality focused aid (3) 49% 62%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 455 428
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 29 39
- Ending violence against women 13 42
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 1 1
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Turkey 64 62 2%
Venezuela 59 1 5%
Syrian Arab Republic 56 7 43%
Colombia 41 22 82%
Morocco 36 28 70%
El Salvador 34 22 89%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 31 22 65%
Côte d'Ivoire 29 1 89%
Guatemala 28 28 88%
Ukraine 27 4 0%
Guatemala 28 25 88%
Ecuador 24 22 90%
Bolivia 25 21 86%
El Salvador 22 19 89%
Morocco 28 19 70%
Colombia 22 18 82%
Paraguay 19 18 94%
Peru 23 16 69%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 22 14 65%
Nicaragua 20 13 66%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
50
100
150
200
250
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
0
200
400
600
800
2007-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scaleLeft hand scale
Sweden
2017 2018
Principal objective 525 580
Significant objective 1,690 2,321
Not targeted 324 442
Not screened 10 39
Total bilateral allocable aid 2,550 3,381
Gender equality focused aid (3) 87% 87%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,035 774
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 43 59
- Ending violence against women 34 57
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 16 18
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Afghanistan 202 202 84%
Tanzania 130 130 72%
Ethiopia 96 95 97%
Mozambique 77 77 97%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 72 72 95%
Somalia 67 67 90%
Kenya 64 64 98%
Uganda 52 52 98%
Bangladesh 50 50 99%
Syrian Arab Republic 49 49 99%
Afghanistan 202 171 84%
Ethiopia 95 93 97%
Tanzania 130 93 72%
Mozambique 77 75 97%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 72 69 95%
Kenya 64 63 98%
Somalia 67 56 90%
Uganda 52 51 98%
Bangladesh 50 50 99%
Syrian Arab Republic 49 45 99%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 99%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
250
500
750
1,000
1,250
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
Switzerland
2017 2018
Principal objective 91 90
Significant objective 961 938
Not targeted 1,009 700
Not screened 300 254
Total bilateral allocable aid 2,361 1,983
Gender equality focused aid (3) 51% 60%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 579 492
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 6 8
- Ending violence against women 11 8
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 48
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Myanmar 69 66 80%
Burkina Faso 52 34 96%
Bangladesh 50 48 79%
Chad 41 39 86%
Niger 36 35 87%
Afghanistan 34 32 54%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 34 33 64%
Syrian Arab Republic 31 31 60%
Mali 30 28 73%
Albania 30 28 75%
Myanmar 66 52 80%
Bangladesh 48 37 79%
Chad 39 33 86%
Burkina Faso 34 32 96%
Niger 35 30 87%
Albania 28 21 75%
West Bank and Gaza Strip 33 21 64%
Mali 28 20 73%
Haiti 25 18 73%
Syrian Arab Republic 31 18 60%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 87%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2007-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
United Kingdom
2017 2018
Principal objective 203 136
Significant objective 2,894 2,750
Not targeted 3,556 3,451
Not screened 0 171
Total bilateral allocable aid 6,653 6,509
Gender equality focused aid (3) 47% 46%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 645 1,077
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 36 27
- Ending violence against women 7 31
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 16 0
(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010
Uganda 484 484 84%
Syrian Arab Republic 261 175 59%
Pakistan 247 246 79%
India 233 232 68%
Somalia 194 192 95%
Afghanistan 153 152 47%
Ethiopia 137 137 82%
Nigeria 126 126 81%
Yemen 96 96 97%
Lebanon 88 86 29%
Uganda 484 409 84%
Pakistan 246 194 79%
Somalia 192 183 95%
India 232 159 68%
Ethiopia 137 111 82%
Syrian Arab Republic 175 104 59%
Nigeria 126 101 81%
Yemen 96 93 97%
Nepal 77 58 76%
Bangladesh 67 58 87%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 99%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2003-04 05-06 07-08 09-10* 11-12 13-14 15-16 2017-18
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
United States
2017 2018
Principal objective 1,266 593
Significant objective 4,471 4,905
Not targeted 21,620 21,225
Not screened 0 0
Total bilateral allocable aid 27,357 26,723
Gender equality focused aid (3) 21% 21%
Memo:
Total non bilateral allocable aid 3,709 3,874
Included in principal:
- Aid to Women's equality organisations 4 6
- Ending violence against women 1 6
Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 10 9
Jordan 1,239 1,221 11%
Afghanistan 1,202 1,057 51%
Ethiopia 957 924 28%
Kenya 931 908 19%
Syrian Arab Republic 869 864 0%
Nigeria 805 780 20%
Iraq 781 754 4%
South Sudan 733 704 13%
Uganda 686 662 22%
Tanzania 631 611 45%
Afghanistan 1,057 536 51%
Tanzania 611 272 45%
Ethiopia 924 259 28%
Kenya 908 170 19%
Democratic Republic of the Congo 566 157 28%
Nigeria 780 153 20%
Pakistan 457 150 33%
Uganda 662 148 22%
Jordan 1,221 138 11%
Mali 208 110 53%
(2) Handbook on the OECD-DAC Gender Equality Policy Marker 2016
(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.
Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category
includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.
Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at http://oe.cd/oda-gender
(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2017-2018, unless otherwise shown
Sector breakdown Top ten recipients
Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to
top ten recipients 2017 USD million
Total aid Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender
equality
focused aid (3)
Top ten recipients of gender equality
focused aidGender equality focus of sectors
2017 USD million2017 USD million
Total bilateral
allocable aid
Gender equality focused aid
(3)
An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and
fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened
for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.
The use of the recommended minimum criteria for the marker by some members in recent years can result in lower levels of aid reported as focused on gender equality
(2).
All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.
Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2017 USD million
Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2017-2018
(1)
020406080
100
Economicinfrastructure
Education
Government and civilsociety
Health
MultisectorOther social
infrastructure
Population andreproductive health
Production
Water and sanitation
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
Education Health andPopulation
Other SocialInfrast., incl.
Women'sequality
EconomicInfrastructure
Production Multisector
Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened
0%
8%
16%
24%
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %
2017 USD million % of bilateral allocable
Right hand scale
Left hand scale
OECD-DAC Secretariat http://oe.cd/oda-gender
