Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DOFCO(NDDB) University of Delhi
Biotech Project
Breeding for Yield
Stabilization in Mustard
(Brassica juncea)
Rapeseed and mustard growing area in India
Breeding objectives in B. juncea
Increase in yield
Increase in yield potential
Hybrids / pure line breeding
Stabilization breeding
Disease and pest resistance
Quality
Oil
Meal
17 10 13 26 30 4
Blight White rust Powdery mildew
Low erucic, low glucosinolate varieties Aphid Others
Status of research in B. juncea
Productivity increase
2 Hybrids
DMH-1, DMH-11
Molecular Breeding
Traits Tagged
Erucic acid
Glucosinolates
Seed coat color
White rust resistance
Ongoing
Alternaria resistance
Stem rot
MAS in progress
Mustard Hybrid DMH-1
• A CMS based hybrid
• Yield advantage >20%
• Resistant to white rust
Performance of hybrid DMH-1 in coordinated trials
during rabi 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2007-08
S.
No.
Strain /
Hybrid
Seed Yield Oil Yield 1000
seed
weight
(g)
Oil
Content
(%) kg/ha %
increase
over
kg/ha %
increase
over
1 DMH-1 2053 - 812 - 3.6 38.38
2 Varuna (NC) 1592 29 616 32 5.4 37.29
3 Kranti (NC) 1701 21 677 20 4.1 39.19
4 RL-1359 (ZC) 1811 13 719 13 4.3 38.95
NC - National Check; ZC - Zonal Check
Reference: AICRPRM reports (2005, 2006, 2008)
Released by ICAR in 2009
(Hissar, Sriganganagar, Navgaon, Delhi, Bawal, Ludhiana, Bathinda)
Performance of DMH-1 in farmers field
Location No. of
Farmers
surveyed
Average
yield of
DMH-1 (q/ac)
Average
yield of
Check
(q/ac)
%
increase
over
check
Alwar & Dousa Distt 25 8.60 6.39 34.59
Sriganganagar 13 9.4 8.11 15.91
Rewari 11 8.60 7.85 9.55
Bharatpur & Agra 14 8.10 7.95 1.89
Yield trial of DMH-11 hybrid Male sterile barnase line
• DMH-11 is barnase-barstar based
• Yield advantage >20%
• Resistant to white rust
• Biosafety tests in progress
bar-spacer-TA29(870)bn
RB LB 35SPr bar barnase 35SpA TA29(870) ocspA spacer AMV
Constructs used for developing transgenic male
sterile and restorer lines
RB
Hind III Pst I
LB 35SdePr bar Bsmod 35SpA TA29(279)
ocspA
bar-TA29(279)-bsmod
Performance of DMH-11 under bio-safety trial
S No Entry
ICAR Centre
Total Mean % Increase
over Kumher Alwar Sgnagar
1 Varuna (barnase) 1986 1789 2513 6287 2096
2 EH-2 (Barstar) 1730 1842 2455 6026 2009
3 Varuna 1866 1741 2670 6278 2093 24%
4 EH-2 1793 1716 2182 5691 1897
5 DMH-11 2285 2515 3000 7801 2600
6 Maya/RL-1359 (ZC) 2057 1767 2287 6112 2037 28%
BRL-I Trial, Kumher
BRL-I Trial, Navgaon
Crossability Study at Bawana
BRL-I Trial, Sri Ganganagar
Application of molecular markers in mustard breeding
By 2012
1. Total no. of markers 2160
2. Types of markers
a) AFLP
b) RFLP
c) SSR
d) Gene markers
e) Intron spanning markers
1282
70
279
13
778
3. Total length (cM) 1850.2
4. Assigning LGs to A and
B genomes
10 A genome LGs
8 B genome LGs
5. Traits tagged
a) Erucic acid
b) Linoleic acid
c) Seed coat colour
d) Glucosinolates
e) White rust resistance
Candidate genes
Candidate genes
SSR markers
Candidate genes
IP markers
Molecular mapping in B. juncea (Varuna x Heera)
wg2a4a 0.0
e39m55h163 7.1
p65t76v198 20.2
p79t78v127 29.2
p65m62h265 33.3
e54t75h129 40.9
e47t64v352 45.9
e39m50h446 54.8
p62t78h185 63.1
p53t76h368 68.4
FAE1.2 72.6 e79t78v205 76.1
e50t67v375 87.1
p32t77v268 110.1
p65m62h181 118.4
e31m50v273 122.9 ea-2
(39
%)
B7
e31m60v98 0.0 e48t78v400 3.6
e34m50v82 12.6
wg2h1 19.4
p62m39v124 27.8
e39m50v500 36.0
e54t71h380 46.7 e32t66h142 49.2
e32t66v191 FAE1.1 50.1
e31m60v195 52.6
p65t90v258 59.9
ea-1
(60
.8%
)
A8
Tagging of Two Loci of Erucic
Acid (ea1 and ea2) by
Candidate Gene Polymorphism
At5g05920 2.4
At5g13190a 12.8
At5g53920 31.9
At1g74640a 48.5
At5g27740b 77.6
ELONG R1 90.1
At5g61970 95.4
Msl
Sqm
s
At4g35530 6.9
At4g21105 18.3
At1g74640b 27.8 ELONG R4/Myb28a 29.9
At3g54670b 37.1
At3g10572b 50.6
At4g01897a 62.5 ALK R1 64.2
At2g30200a 77.5 Tsw
Sq
l P
br
ALK R2 0.6 8.6
At5g63905 21.5
At2g14170a 34.2
At2g19260 44.9
At3g46560 57.9
At2g03060 68.3
At1g22860 78.5
At3g55430a 90.6
At3g62620 104.4
At2g20490b 118.0
At2g22370 129.7
At3g06483 8.8
At3g10572a 19.1
At3g20920 30.1 At5g47890 44.6 At5g27830
46.2
At5g66290 53.2
At1g58220a 55.3
At3g23980 61.6
At3g14850 74.3
At3g12260b 84.9
At3g13062 100.4
A2 A3 A9 B1
138
75
25 113
12
134
4-5
63520
ELONG R1
61970
?
27740b
74640b
ELONGR4 Myb28a
14045
05755 05590 54670b
Myb28b
Tagging of loci involved in glucosinolate biosynthesis in B. juncea
?
Negative yield QTL from low GSL parent
Ramchiary et al 2007, TAG Bisht et al 2009, TAG
Gsl1
Gsl2
Gsl3 Gsl5
At5g27560
Myb28c 17.4
Status of mapping in different B. juncea populations
Cross Type of
Population
Total markers
available
Traits of
interest Value
Varuna x Heera
(VH)
1200 DH lines,
465 RILs
AFLP- 1290
RFLP- 70
IP- 797
SSR- 287
Gene markers- 32
Seed size,
Oil content,
Erucic acid,
Glucosinolate,
White rust resistance
5.2 (TSW) 2.6
41% 36%
52 % 0%
114 uM 14
S R
TM4 x Donskaja
(TD)
134 DH lines AFLP- 585
IP- 318
SSR- 8
Oil content,
White rust resistance 40% 45%
S R
Donskaja x EH2
(DEH)
296 DH lines IP- 323
SSR- 241
Gene markers- 8
Oil content ,
Erucic acid 45% 36%
25% 0%
EH2 x J8
(EHJ8)
1000 DH lines IP – 348
SSR- 144
SNP - 239
Oil content,
Oil and meal quality 36% 50%
EH2 x Pusa Jai Kisan
(EHPJ)
300 DH lines IP- 797
SSR- 287
Gene markers- 32
Seed size,
Oil content,
Erucic acid,
glucosinolate
2.6 (TSW) 6.7
36% 42%
52% 0%
115 uM 14
Limitations in mapping
Markers available for ‘A’ genome but not enough for saturating QTL regions of interest Not enough markers available for ‘B’ genome Need to generate more makers – microsatellite and SNPs
Transcriptome sequencing of Brassica species
• Illumina GA II Technology • Samples used: leaf, stem, inflorescence and developing siliqua • Species used
B. rapa B. juncea
Indian East European
Chiifu ssp Chinensis Candle ssp Oleifera YSPB-24 ssp Trilocularis Tetra ssp Trilocularis
Varuna Pusa Jai Kisan
Heera EH-2 Donskaja
J8
SNP data generated and SNP based map being developed in B. juncea
SNP data generated and SNP based map developed in B. rapa
White rust
Resistance available in east European B. juncea lines
Cause
Losses in yield
Albugo candida 17- 34%
• Two mapping populations used Varuna x Heera (VH) and TM4 x Donskaja (TD)
• Phenotyping of VH and TD populations identified two different loci for white rust resistance
• The two loci are being transferred to different B. juncea lines using tightly linked markers
Mapping for white rust resistance in B. juncea
A4
At3g63420b*(3g150) 0.0 At3g54650(3g66) 2.4 At3g58500a*(3g165) At3g55440b(3C-18) 4.7 p62m59h197 5.5 At5g37480(5gAJ30k) At1g77550(174)
At4g13940*b(4C3) WR3 At5g37580(288)
6.4
At5g37630(5g59) 7.3 At5g37850(5gAJ31) 8.2 WR17 9.2 WR22 9.9 At5g41560(5gAJ35) 10.6 At1g66410(254d) At2g21150(2g135) WR26 11.8
At5g36880*(5g57v) At2g22000a(2g136) 12.5 At2g22640(2g137) 13.3 At2g24765a*(2C-9) 15.8 At2g25737(2C-10) p53m47h285 17.4 At2g28880b*(2C-15) 22.8 At1g69980(1gLP78) 25.2 e47m43h330 At2g30130*(AJ-2g11) 26.2 At2g31490a(2g59a) 29.8 At2g33040(417) At2g07440b*(2g105) At2g32520(2g61) 32.5
e31m58v101 36.4 GE-R3 At2g35790(2g66) 39.8 At2g36530c*(2C-22) 42.1 At2g37040*(ec4c11) 43.1 At2g37150*(wg4a4) 43.7 At2g40690*(wg5b2) At2g40765b(2g74b) 53.3 At1g76540(183b) 55.3 At2g42040(2g76) 56.6 p63t78v400 62.2 At2g44520(2g167) 74.9
Wh
ite
rust
Varuna-Heera
WR locus:7-17cM
TM4-Donskaja
WR locus:18-24cM
A5
Wh
ite
rust
At2g46390(2g82) 0.0
2g472.2 15.1 2g428 20.9 e47t70v258 e51t78t290 2g337 p32t77d380 27.3
2g415(b) e55t73t240 29.1 2g415(a) e50t66t380 29.6 e31m42v144 e35t63v351 e48t78v225 msa21 e34m62v89 e31m58v430 e31m61v136 e34m62v157 e31m49v336 e34m62t160 2g55(NCB)
32.6
e31m49v295 34.4 e31m50t98 43.9
p32t77v301 p32t77d310 56.9 3g14 57.5
2g385 64.5 e34m62d143 66.5 5g218 68.6 e35t63v240 70.4
Marker-assisted introgression of two white rust
resistance loci into popular Indian varieties of mustard
Donskaja IV AcB1-A5.1
X EH-2 AcB1-A4.1
F1
DH (296 lines)
Foreground selection
AcB1-A5.1 – (At2g36360)
AcB1-A4.1 - (At5g41560 and At5g41940)
Line no. 67, 98, 144 and 207
• contain two resistance loci
• Early maturity
• Good plant type
Pusa bold
Varuna
Pusa Jai Kisan
Rohini
EH-2
X
F1 BC1
Foreground and background
selection
BC3 Selfing / DH
Alternaria blight
Cause
Losses in yield
Alternaria brassiceae
35- 46% in mustard
up to 70% in toria and yellow
sarson (B. campestris)
No resistance source available in cultivated Brassica species
• One major resistance locus identified on chromosome 2 of Arabidopsis using RIL between a resistance and susceptible parent
• Using phenotype genotype correlation resistance locus mapped down to 1 MB
• The region has now been fine mapped and further
narrowed down to 32Kb by phenotyping and genotyping of recombinants
Mapping of Alternaria resistance in A. thaliana
Alternaria resistance locus in Arabidopsis
587
608
613
626
OXF
644
PVU II 120 kb 32 kb
7 genes
Cv x Gre
26
Cloning of the candidate genes for
complementation studies
Candidate gene
Candidate gene
Gre 3.2 MP 132
• At2g25409
• At2g25410
• At2g25420
• At2g25430
• At2g25440
• At2g25450
Stem rot
• No source of resistance in cultivated Brassica species
• Transgenics being developed using Oxalate oxidase gene
from Barley and PGIP gene from Arabidopsis in B. juncea var.
Varuna
Cause
Losses in yield
Sclerotinia
sclerotiorum
Depends on % incidence
RB
Kan 35S AtPGIP 1 HA
LB
RB
Kan BaR 35S AtPGIP 2 HA
LB
35S BOXO
LB RB
BaR
Spec
CD3-687-AtPGIP1
CD3-687-AtPGIP2
pZP200-baR-35SBOXO
i
ii
iii
Constructs used for developing transgenics in B. juncea for Stem rot
BaR
In vitro testing of transgenics for stem rot resistance
48hrs
72hrs
Collaborations
Prof Deepak Pental
Dr. Arundhati Mukhopadhyay Prof. Akshay Pradhan
Dr. Vibha Gupta Dr. Pradeep Burma
Dr. Y. S. Sodhi Dr. Naveen Bisht
Dr. N. Arumugam Dr. Indira Sivaraman
Dr. Arun Jagannath Dr. N. Ramchiary
Mr. Jagdish Verma Dr. Priya Panjabi
Mr. B. S. Yadav Dr. Amrendra
Dr. Sarita Sharma Dr. Lakshmi K. Padmaja
Dr. Satish Yadav Mr. Diwakar Nandan
Dr. Jagreet Kaur