29
Drew Morgan Director, Business Integration Office of the Secretary of Defense - Comptroller March 13, 2014 DoD Financial Management Strategy & Initiatives v4

DoD Financial Management Strategy & Initiatives · Drew Morgan Director, Business Integration Office of the Secretary of Defense - Comptroller March 13, 2014 DoD Financial Management

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Drew Morgan

Director, Business Integration

Office of the Secretary of Defense - Comptroller

March 13, 2014

DoD Financial Management

Strategy & Initiatives

v4

OUSD(C) Strategic

Management Plan

FY 2011-2017

Strategic

Management Goals

DoD Strategic

Management Plan

FY 2014-2015

Business Priorities

Quadrennial Defense Review

Report (QDR)

February 2010

Strategic Goals

2

Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership:

Priorities for 21st Century Defense

January 2012

New Strategic Guidance

DoD Financial Management is Aligned with Higher-Level Strategic Goals

Reducethe cost

of doing

business

Championa strong and capable

financial management

workforce

Acquireresources necessary

to meet national

defense objectives

Ensurethe legal, effective,

and efficient use of

DoD resources

StrengthenDoD

Financial

Management

Reform Agenda:Increase efficiencies in

HQ and administrative

functions

New QDR

to be Released

Feb 2014

OUSD(C) Strategic

Management Plan

FY 2011-2017

Strategic

Management Goals

Championa strong and capable

financial management

workforce

Acquireresources necessary

to meet national

defense objectives

Ensurethe legal, effective,

and efficient use of

DoD resources

DoD Financial Management is Aligned with Higher-Level Strategic Goals

Changes Affecting

Everyone

The Right Skill

Sets and

Career

Framework

Getting More

out of the

Program to

Support

Mission

Confidence in

Public

Stewardship

and Improved

Efficiency

Desired

Outcomes

Emerging FM

Certification

Program

Downward

Pressure on

DoD Top Line

Demands for

Financial

Auditability

Strategy to Budget to Execution –

Knowing DoD Strategic Cascade is the Start of Knowing How You Fit in3

4

Under Audit

19.5%

Preparing for Audit

80.5%

DoD’s Current SBR Status

Source: FY 2012 DoD Statement of Budgetary Resources

Budgetary

Resources

(in millions)

Audit Opinion/Under Audit

Military Retirement Fund & Payment $122,622 10.17%

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Civil Works 26,961 2.23%

U.S. Marine Corps, GF 33,405 2.77%

TRICARE Management Activity - CRM 16,087 1.34%

Medicare-Eligible Retiree Healthcare Fund & Payment 15,452 1.28%

Defense Commissary Agency, WCF 7,522 0.62%

Defense Information Systems Agency, WCF 6,861 0.57%

Defense Information Systems Agency, GF 2,905 0.24%

Defense Finance and Accounting Service 1,389 0.12%

Defense Contract Audit Agency 600 0.05%

Office of the Inspector General, DoD 360 0.03%

Defense Commissary Agency, GF 357 0.03%

Subtotal Under Audit $234,521 19.47%

Preparing for Audit

Army, GF $312,151 25.91%

Air Force, GF 215,329 17.87%

Navy, GF 193,321 16.05%

Defense Logistics Agency, WCF 52,053 4.32%

Navy, WCF 33,363 2.77%

DoD Component Level Accounts 30,207 2.51%

Service Medical Activity 22,377 1.86%

US Special Operations Command 13,473 1.12%

Army, WCF 13,201 1.10%

Air Force, WCF 12,442 1.03%

Other Defense Reporting Entities 72,304 6.00%

Subtotal Preparing for Audit $970,221 80.53%

Total Budgetary Resources $1,204,742 100%

Reporting Entity Percent

“We need auditable statements,

both to improve the quality of our

financial information and to reassure

the public, and the Congress, that we

are good stewards of public funds.

We have a focused plan and are

making progress.”

5

Secretary’s View on Auditability

“ I strongly support this initiative and will do everything I can to

fulfill this commitment.”

– Secretary Hagel, HASC Testimony, April 11, 2013

DoD FM Environment

Dramatically Lower FM Business Mission Support

Costs

Improve and Standardize Information

Ensure Auditability

Outcomes

Goals

Maximize Operational

ERPs

DoD Policy Based on

Successful Pilots

Enablers

Strategic Investment Decisions Aligned with FM

Target

Information Driven Standards-Based Reduce Cost

Simplified Affordable Secure Sustainable Auditable

Simplify the Department's FM Environment

Achieve and Sustain an Auditable Environment

Strengthen Interoperability

Achieve Compliance

Improve Decision Making

6

“Burning Platform”

Compelling Need for Rapid Business Integration

OSD-C/DCMO GovernanceDITPR

DoD IT Shared Services StrategyStandards [BEA, SFIS, SLOA, PDS]

Audit Deadlines

Challenges

• Laws, Regulations, Policies

• Culture

• Scarce Expertise

ODO/Component

Department

Federal-wide

Optimum “Enterprise”

Balance

Inherently Government

Federal Shared

Services

Commercial

Outsourcing

KEY Foundational Pieces Now In

Place

Drastic Budget Cuts/Mission

GrowthOperational Effectiveness

Visibility, Transparency

Audit Deadlines

Installation/

Command

7

Auditability

TARGET- Reduce Interfaces via Standard

Transaction Broker

- Minimize Reconciliations

- Supported Balances

327 Systems

2,000+ Point-to-Point Interfaces

Numerous Manual Reconciliations

Unsupportable Balances

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

# Systems,

Interfaces,

Manual

Processes

Simplified Environment and

Improved efficiencies

Potential Savings to:

Repurpose to the

Mission

Not

sustainable

at current

budget

levels

Auditability

sustainable at current

& future budget levels

8

~ 327 FM

Systems,

SNaP-IT Budget =

$719M*

Reducing the Number of Systems and Interfaces Through Standards & ERPs

Offers the Most Potential for Simplifying the Environment and

Reduce Total Cost of FM Operations and

Enable Sustained Audit by Reducing FM Systems

IT Budget

Reconciliations, Rework,

Redundant and Manual Processes,

Unsupportable Balances

Auditability, Complexity and

Issues, Point to Point, Data

Calls, Information Uncertainty

Internal Controls,

Material

Weaknesses,

Non-Standards

9

Strategic Priorities

• Simplify the FM environment: processes, standards, technology that drive

fewer systems and interfaces

• Generate reliable and auditable budget and accounting data: support

better management decisions

• Maximize capabilities of operational ERPs: drive more functionality into

ERPs and eliminate legacy systems

• Fix what matters: cost/benefit matters

Business Mission Area Outcomes

• Better financial information for business decisions

• Stronger internal controls impacting financial reporting and auditability

• End-to-end funds traceability and data flow linkage between budget and

expenditures.

• Interoperability among business systems and E2E processes

Business Integration FM Functional Strategy

10

Reducing the Number of Systems and Interfaces Through Standards &

ERPs Offers the Most Potential for &

Achieving Auditability

Annual Campaign

Plans• Applying FM Initiative

& Enablers

• Resulting in Annual

System Retirements

System

System

System

System

System

System

System

System

System

System

System

FM ERP

System

System

System

System

Point-to-Point Interface

Point-to-Point InterfacePoint-to-Point Interface

Point-to-Point Interface

Point-to-Point Interface

System

System

System

System

System

System

System

FM ERP

System

System

Point-to-Point Interface

Point-to-Point Interface

Point-to-Point Interface

Point-to-Point Interface

System

System

FM ERP

SystemSystem

System

System

System

System

System

Point-to-Point Interface

Point-to-Point Interface

Point-to-Point Interface

Point-to-Point Interface

Point-to-Point Interface

System

Point-to-Point Interface

System

FY14

FY18

FY15

FY16

FY17

FM ERPFM ERP

FM ERP

Cross Functional ERP

Cross Functional ERPCross Functional ERP

Cross Functional ERP

Cross Functional ERP

Cross Functional ERPFM ERP

FM ERP

System

STANDARD DoD

FM TARGET

ENVIRONMENT

~ 327 Roadmap

Systems ,

Annual Budget =

$719M*

~ 120Target Systems,

Annual Budget = ~$220M

11

FM Roadmap Fiscal Year 2013

LEGEND: Color Code by System Owner – Army, Navy, Air Force, DFAS, other DoD/OSD, Multiple or

Unknown; Italics for Non-FM IRB Systems; (P) Partial Replacement

DRAFT 12

FM Systems - FY 2013 - FY 2018

Component2013 FM Systems

BaselineFM Migrating/Retiring

Systems – FY13-18FM Core Systems

FY 18

FM/FM Feeder Target

Systems- FY 18

ARMY 89 47 15 27

NAVY 60* 10 13 36

USMC 1 0 0 1

USAF 41** 9 14 14

Total Services 191 66 42 78

DCMA 2 0 0 1

DCMO 1 0 0 1

DFAS 69 14 38 17

DISA 14 7 1 6

DLA 14 7 0 7

DODDE 1*** 1 0 0

DODEA 1 1 0 0

DTRA 1 1 0 0

JOINT STAFF 1 0 0 1

MDA 3 3 0 0

OSD 3 2 0 1

OSD/DSCA 1 0 0 1

OSDCAPE 1 1 0 0

DHA (TMA) 2 0 0 2

TRANSCOM 3 2 0 1

USD(AT&L) 3 0 0 3

USD(C) 2 2 0 0

WHS 4 3 0 1

Total DoD Agencies 126 44 39 42

Unknown 10 9 0 1

Grand Total 327 119 81 121

As of 3/14/2014 DRAFT

Reporting/Cash(DDRS,DCAS)

Business Analytics tools (BA)

(DCD/DCW)

Target FM Business Systems Environment

Core ERPs (DAI , EBAS, Navy

ERP, GFEBS, DEAMS,EBS,

GCSS-A, LMP, MSC-FMS)

Treasury (GTAS, CARS, USAspending)

We Can Achieve This by Executing the FM Functional Strategy

Standard Transaction Broker (STB)

(GEX)

Component Capabilities

Functional Areas

FMBudget

InventoryAcquisition

Payroll/PersonnelTravel

Logistics

Vendors

Portal

Enterprise-wide Standard

Data, Processes and

Systems

Disbursing(ADS,DDS)

Key Question: Are any legacy Acct/FM Systems still part of FY 18 Target

Environment? i.e. SABRS??,

FAMIS, NGRMS, DTS, IPPS’, DCPS

14

• Compliance and Standards

– Standardize data

o Standard Line of Accounting (SLOA)

and Standard Financial Information

Structure (SFIS)

o Standardized data passed across

E2Es

o USSGL: logic & posting

• Leverage Technology

– Standard Transaction Broker

o Routing, translation, validation &

business rules

o Eliminate point-to-point interfaces

– Business Analytics & Intelligence

– Shared Services

• Process & Systems

Improvements

– Government-wide Accounting

(GWA)

o Direct Treasury Disbursing

o Intergovernmental (IGT)

o CARS & GTAS to support

FBWT

– Enterprise PPBE

o Standard budget development

o Funds Distribution

o Sub-allotment execution and

visibility

o Cost Management

Campaign Plans to Achieve the Strategy

15

Stringent Investment Decisions Aligned with Target

Business Intelligence Tool (BI)

Dependencies Exist Among InitiativesThe Campaign Plans Ensure Coordination and Effective Use of Enablers

SFIS/ SLOA

USSGL

DoD FM Policy Based on Successful Pilots

S

T

R

O

N

G

E

S

T

E

N

A

B

L

E

R

S

FIAR/ Sustainable Auditability

Cost Management

Evolving

Integration

Interoper-ability

Initiative Key

Compliance & Standards

Process & System

Improvements

Leverage Technology

Sub-Allotments

Funds Distribution

Standard PPBE

Treasury System Roll-out

Delinquent Debt Mgmt

IGT/IPP

Daily Cash Reporting

16

Maximize Leveraging the ERPs

GWA

Initiatives

Direct Treasury Disbursing

FY13 Strategic/FM Initiative Progress2013 Outcomes Against Plan

2013

ST

RA

TE

GIC

IN

ITIA

TIV

ES C

om

pli

an

ce

an

d S

tan

da

rds

Pro

ces

s &

Sys

tem

Im

pro

ve

me

nts

Key measurable, impactful outcomes to date

FIAR

• # SBR Assertions and

Exams

SLOA

• Implementation Plan

• System updates

SFIS / USSGL

• SFIS Implementation Plans

& Checklists in OEPs

• Schedule Validations

EFD / NGRMS

• EFD Phase I rollout cont’d

• Issue Policy, Pilot TI-97 funds

• NGRMS Material Dev.

Direct Treasury Disb.

• Conduct/validate pilots

• Refine enterprise model

Govt-wide Accounting (GWA)

• DoD and Treasury system

changes

Intragovernmental (IGT)

• Pilot w/ USMC, Navy

Delinquent Debt Mgmt.

• Issue Implem Guidance

Cost Management

• Est. Enterprise Prod. Team

• Define Common Cost

Elements

24 SBR Assertions

11 SBR Exams Conducted

USSGL Waiver Memo issued

Waivers requested & granted

SFIS Implementation Plans &

Checklists in all OEPs

Issued Implementation Guidance

Initiated DDM workgroup to

facilitate rollout

EFD

Phase I rollout continued

Initiated Phase 2 refinement--

system dev focus for FY14

Issued Policy; piloted TI-97 funds

NGRMS

Program refined

Leve

rag

e T

ech

no

log

y

Maximize ERPs• Components develop

plans to maximize ERP

use in the following

areas:

– Budget Planning &

Formulation

– Purchase Card

– Time & Attendance

– Internal Entitlement

(Trans. For Self)

– Treasury Disbursing

• Components develop

system sunset plans

Standard Transaction

Broker (STB)• Finalize Plan for FM

Integration

• Issue Policy and

Guidance

Business Intelligence

Tools (BI)• Pilot CivPay and MilPay

• Conclude and assess

sub-allotment pilot

• Finalize plan for FM

rollout

• Cost Management

FY13 pilot with Joint Staff, Air

Force, and TRANSCOM

resulted in proof of concept

using BIA tool to provide

traceability and auditability of

sub-allotted funds execution

2013

Part of DBC IRB Process

System updates initiated

Finalized Plan, ConOps &

awarded contract for FM

Integration-GEX: SFIS / SLOA

Centralized Service (SCS)

approach

Policy & Guidance in process

PLANNED ACTUAL

PLANNED ACTUAL

Pilots validated & expanded

Refined enterprise model re:

Standards and BI linkages; identified

additional pilots , including MOCAS

Completed system changes

IPACS daily recon pilot validated

IPP pilot validated & expanded

Navy project office established

Established Enterprise Integrated

Product Team

Draft Cost Framework developed

Expanded use of ERPs

• Treasury Disbursing by

Army and WHS

# of Systems

Retired/Migrated = 18

Components FM Strategies &

OEPs included sunset plans via

SV-8s

• Reviews completed

• Refinement initiated

2013

17

Why do we need a standard

transaction broker?

TODAY TARGET

Point-to-Point “Spaghetti” – Expensive!!! Extremely difficult to Manage or Standardize

Hub and Spoke – Cheaper, Easy to Standardize and Manage, More Scalable

* GEX is the De Facto Standard for Integration among 4th

Estate Business Systems, and is being evolved to serve as

the Target Standard Transaction Broker.

18

Standard Enterprise Lines of Accounting

Partner

System

Partner

System

Partner

System

Partner

System

Partner

System

Partner

System

Partner

System

MAP

MAP-5

MAP-6

HS

4 –

9

Acc

ou

nti

ng

Syst

ems

/ P

urc

has

e R

equ

isit

ion

ing

HS-

1 –

3

Treas

PAM/SPS

DFAS ADS

5.1

5.2

*MAP represents a standard data exchange with system-agnostic standard datasets

Dis

bu

rsin

g Sy

stem

s

MAP-3

MAP

Commitment

(PRDS)

MAP-1

Funds

Validation

MAP-2

Contract Award

and Reporting

(PDS)

MAP-3

Entitlement

MAP-4

Payment

MAP-5

Cash Reporting

MAP-6

AF ConWrite

DLA SPS*GWA

Noncompliant

Army

PADDS*SLOA Data not

provided

DLA eProc

Co

ntractin

g System

s

2.1

2.2

2.4

EDA

2.3

Rep

ortin

g

3.1

Proposed Pilots

Not GEX

Connected

DLA DCAS

Cash

R

econ

ciliation

6.1

AF DEAMS

DLA DAI

Army LMP

DLA EBS

GFEBS

Navy ERP

Army

CEFMS

EBAS

DFAS GAFS-

RDFAS

SABRSDFAS

STARS

WHS EBAS

Navy MSC

FMS

PR Builder

DISA FAMIS

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.10

1.11

1.12

1.13

1.14

1.15

1.3

1.9

1.2

1.1

Vendor Pay Standard Process

ERPs and Silos

21

Core Accounting:

General Funds

Core Accounting:

WCFs

Budget Formulation

& Exhibit GenerationTimekeeping &

Cost Management AcquisitionInventory &

Logistics

ODO-DAI

ODO-EBAS

Army GFEBS

Army LMP

Army GCSS

Navy ERP

MC-GCSS

AF-DEAMS

Core FM

Other

Functional

Areas…

planned

Further Leveraging Integrated ERP Capabilities Offers the Most Potential

for Reducing the Number of Systems and Interfaces

US Standard General Ledger

(Budgetary and Proprietary)

Budgetary Resource

Management

Payment Management

Financial Reporting

General Ledger Management

Funds Balance with Treasury Management

Receivables Management

Cost Management

FM Functional Strategy

Core Financial System

Functions/Capabilities

Execution-Level Planning

Programming

Budget Planning and Formulation

Exhibit Generation

Funds Distribution & Control

Prior-Year Actuals Feed

Translation to Capabilities Available

Today in the Core FM ERPs

Matching & Payment Warehousing

Disbursing

Billings & Collections

IPACS

Budget Execution/ Funds Mgmt/ Funds Control

(General & Working Capital Funds)

Commitments, Obligations, Expenditures, Reimbursables

Treasury and OMB Reporting (Standard Feeds)

Cost Accounting (GFEBS,DAI Navy ERP)

Cost Accumulation and Allocation

Timekeeping (Navy ERP uses T&A)

Acquisition

Core FM

Inventory

Payroll/ Personnel

Travel

Logistics

ERPs Offer Additional

Capabilities for Other

Functional

Areas

Standard Interfacing / Business Integration

Standard Business Intelligence and Analytics

ERP capabilities maximized today

Initiatives underway to further leverage

Further leveraging needed – Enterprise

PPBE ConOps and Cost Management

Framework / Proof of Concept underway

FM Initiatives are now underway leveraging all of

these ERP capabilities

22

Questions/Discussion

3/14/2014 9:27 AM Presentation Title 23

Back-up

3/14/2014 9:27 AM Presentation Title 24

How Does SLOA Support the FM Strategic Initiatives?FM Strategic Initiative Outcomes How SLOA Enables Each Outcome

Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR)

SBR Assertion FY 2014Financial Statement Assertion FY 2017

• Software tracks and records audit trail at each exchange of data, business rule modification, format transformation, etc.

• Enables matching transactions between multiple accounting/feeder systems in 1-to-1 format which can be easily reconciled

• Enables cleaner end-to-end transactional flow and processing

Standard Line of Accounting (SLOA) Improved E2E FM Information Exchange • Enables clean interoperability across the enterprise E2Es

SFIS/USSGL Compliance and Validation

• Proper Posting of Transactions in DoD Financial Systems

• SFIS Compliance Plans as part of Component OEPs

• Workbooks define and reformat subset of SFIS data (SLOA) into standard definitions

• Data compliance with Treasury and OMB standards

Enterprise Funds Distribution/Next Generation Resource Management System (EFD/NGRMS)

Integrated capability to formulate, distribute, track and execute the DoD budget

• Links transactions to the Budget/Funds Distribution data• Transformed, standard data for allocation and distribution of funds

identically across the enterprise

Direct Treasury Disbursing Standard FBWT Daily Recon Process

• Enables automatic matching of disbursement to accounting system (near real-time recon)

• Enables routing ERP data directly to Treasury• Provides necessary data to prepare a Direct Treasury Pay Ready File

Government-wide Accounting (GWA)

Daily Treasury Reporting - GWA compliance by Oct. 14Standard FBWT Daily Recon Process

• Enables translation of TAS/BETC standard data elements to ADS• Consolidates DSSNs into standard repository for daily reporting

Intragovernmental Transactions (IGT)

• Standardize IGT Process DoD-Wide• Eliminate manual processes and multiple forms• Single Repository for IGT Orders for audit readiness• Reduce IGT Eliminations material weakness

• Enables standardized MIPRs necessary data to perform eliminations• Intakes data formats into single central repository from multiple buyer

systems and transforms it into a standard format, and vice versa• Standard buyer and seller data provides data matching and reconciliation

Delinquent Debt ManagementDelinquent debt collections to treasury after 90 days, using re-engineered processes

• Enables matching and analysis of invoice data to obligation data in real-time and analyzes discrepancies between the two

• Provides flags against delinquency business rules and provides error report when rules are violated (document LOAs overpaid, etc.)

Maximize ERP Capabilities• E2E Process Improvement• Eliminate redundant capabilities in the E2Es

• Take advantage of imbedded controls within ERPs• Eliminates inefficiencies and reliance on feeder systems• Reduces need to point-to-point interfaces & downstream errors

Standard Transaction Broker Reduce/Minimize Point-to-Point Interfaces• Already connected to the GEX• Minimizes need to reconfigure legacy systems• Enables translation, validation, and routing between key E2E systems

Business Intelligence ToolsNear real-time, standards-based information and analytics from authoritative sources

• Software provides detailed reports at each exchange of data, business rule modification, format transformation, etc.

Cost ManagementConsistent cost data and management across the Department

• Enables use of cost management codes and OCC for cost reporting• Provides the cost management information on every purchasing

transaction which will facilitate Full Cost Accounting3/14/2014 DRAFT-For Official Use Only25

FM Strategic Initiatives to Achieve Target StateUpdated Campaign Plans

2014

ST

RA

TE

GIC

IN

ITIA

TIV

ES

Co

mp

lia

nc

e a

nd

Sta

nd

ard

s

2015 2016 2017 2018

Delivers Measurable Outcomes Over the Next Five Years

FIAR• Achieve SBA audit readiness

• % of DoD FBWT validated

• % mission critical assets

validated for Existence &

Completeness

SFIS / SLOA **• JITC: SFIS/SLOA

Validations begin

• GEX/SCS Crosswalks

completed for Pilots

• GEX/SCS MAPS 1-3 Pilots

• SFIS/SLOA Centralized

Services Proof of Concept

complete

USSGL **• JITC: USSGL Validations of

Chart of Accounts, Posting

Logic, and DDRS Trial

Balances begins

• All USSGL Waiver requests

addressed & validated

Transparency

• Comply FFATA & OMB Jun

12, 2013 memo

• Qtrly .validate Grants awards

(obl.) in Fin. Systems &

USASpending.gov

• # Qualified / Unqualified

SBA/SBR Opinions

• # Assertions and Exams

For Core/Target systems:

• SFIS 10.0 system updates

complete

• System SFIS/SLOA

interface compliance

• JITC SFIS/SLOA

Validations continue

• Improve interoperability

within E2Es

• GEX/SCS Deployed or

additional pilots underway

For Core/Target systems:

• JITC Compliance

validations continue

• Improved posting of

accounting transactions

within the lifecycle of

accounting events

• Review and report

completed FIAR FROs for

Contract and Vendor Pay

• Continue to validate Grant

awards (obligation data)

between Fin. Systems &

USASpending.gov

• # Qualified / Unqualified

SBA/SBR Opinions

• # Assertions and Exams

• Continued SFIS compliance

• Improved Interoperability

within an E2E

• Improved audit readiness

• Improved FBWT Recon

• Improved execution data

• Improved trial balances

• Improved audit readiness

•Continue with Bronze and

Review and report completed

FIAR FROs for Contract and

Vendor Pay

•Continue to validate Grant

awards (obligation data)

between Fin. Systems &

USASpending.gov

• Achieve full audit readiness

for all DoD Financial

Statements

• # Assertions and Exams

• # Qualified / Unqualified

Opinions

• Full Integration & Std. of

Acct. Sys. Contract/Grant

Writing Systems to EDA via

GEX

• Federal Spending

Transparency for Contract

and Grant awards as part

of Wave 4 of the FIAR

Plan

• # Exams

• # Qualified / Unqualified

Opinions

** Initiatives heavily leverage or intend to leverage ERPs as enabler

3/14/2014 26

FM Strategic Initiatives to Achieve Target State2014

ST

RA

TE

GIC

IN

ITIA

TIV

ES

Pro

ce

ss &

Sys

tem

Im

pro

ve

me

nts

2015 2016 2017 2018

Direct Treasury Disbursing **• Pilot Vendor Pay (GFEBS)

• Pilot MOCAS

Cash Reporting• Support deployment of

Enterprise Recon Tool

Intra-governmental (IGT)/IPP• Define IPP federal-wide rollout

via Navy with Std Trans Broker

integration

• Rollout to Army

• Publish Std. Data Set

Delinquent Debt Mgmt.• Begin Pilot w/GFEBS

Treasury System Roll-out

(CARS & GTAS)• GTAS implementation

• Test CARS upgrades

• Integ w/Std Trans Broker

Standard PPBE **• NGRMS: Incr 1 sys dev

• Work with Prog. Budget –

redefine budget formulation/

planning process (i.e. budget

exhibits)

Fund Distribution (FD) **• Complete requirements phase II

Sub-Allotment Execution **• Submit Problem Statement to

DBC to request funding for AoA

for DoD-wide solution

Cost Management **• Develop Cost Framework

• Perform proof of concept/ pilot

(likely Army)

• Define data elements & issue

policies

• Pilot & Evaluate Civilian Pay,

Military Pay, Travel Pay

• Rollout Enterprise Recon Tool

• Assess pilot results

• Expand transactional volumes

with all components

• Evaluate GFEBS Pilot results,

determine future

implementations

• Complete GTAS DoD rollout

• Complete CARS DoD rollout

• NGRMS: Continue Incr 1 sys

dev; implement Q4

• Explore Budget capability in

ERPs

• Implement GF TI-97 in two

steps

• Develop FD Phase III req.

• Re-engineer process to

support auditability and

reduce manual processes

• Measure cost of ops/ lines of

business using Cost

Framework

• Utilize cost data to inform

budget planning

• Commence full deployment

across DoD Enterprise

• Integrated Cash

reconciliation, forecasting

and visibility

• Maximize DoD trading

partner volumes

• Expand to non-DoD Trading

partners

• Full use of new business

processes & systems

• Full use of new business

processes & systems

• NGRMS: Incr 2 sys dev

• Continue integration with FM

ERPs, BA & FD

• Exchange and recon of

budget data in unified data

model

• Visibility and auditability

across all components

• Manual processes

eliminated

• Measure cost of ops/ lines of

business using Cost

Framework

• Utilize cost data to inform

budget planning

• Complete rollout

• Full use of new business

processes & systems

• Full use of new business

processes & systems

• Complete rollout to ODOs

• Full use of new business

processes & systems

• NGRMS: Implement Incr 2 Q3;

start Incr 3 sys dev Q2

• Complete integration with FM

ERPs, BA & FD

• Provide system solution with

string internal controls to

support FY17 audit readiness

• Further refinement & metrics

tracking

• NGRMS: Implement Incr 3

Q3; start Incr 4 sys dev Q2 to

be implem FY19 Q3

• Visibility of enterprise-wide

PPBE information

• Further refinement & metrics

tracking

Go

vern

men

t-W

ide A

cco

un

tin

gE

nte

rpri

se P

PB

E

*In addition to other performance measures specifically noted in the plans

** Initiatives heavily leverage or intend to leverage ERPs as enabler3/14/2014

27

FM Strategic Initiatives to Achieve Target State

2014

ST

RA

TE

GIC

IN

ITIA

TIV

ES

2015 2016 2017 2018L

eve

rag

e T

ec

hn

olo

gy

Delivers Measurable Outcomes Over the Next Five Years

Std Transaction Broker

(STB)• Establish DISA hosting &

DFAS management of SCS

• Identify Business Rules and

Validation Rules for the

GEX/SCS for SFIS/SLOA

Business Analytics (BA)• DCFO/BIO will present

Problem Statement to DBC in

2Q14 to request funding for

AoA for DoD-wide solution

• GEX evolves to Target

STB

• # transaction sets

sending SLOA data

correctly

• # Point-to-point

interfaces reduced for

FM SLOA systems

• Expand Sub-Allotment

solution to Army, Navy,

SOCOM & 4th Estate

• # transaction sets

sending SLOA data

correctly

• Remaining point-to-

point interfaces

eliminated for FM

SLOA systems

• Near real-time

standards-based

information and

analytics from

authoritative sources

• # transaction sets

sending SLOA data

correctly

• Continue refinement of

BA tools

• Operational use of BA

tools to inform decision

making

• # transaction sets

sending SLOA data

correctly

Shared Services• Define SS as part of

comprehensive SM ConOps

• # SSP evaluations

completed

• # SSP pilots conducted

• # SSP evaluations

completed

• # SSP pilots conducted

• # SSP pilots expanded

• # SSP evaluations

completed

• # SPP pilots conducted

• # SSP pilots expanded

• All duplicative FM

Target system

capabilities are

consolidated under

Shared Services

3/14/2014 28

1/8/2014 29

Decision Tree to Determine Target FM SystemsTotal FM Inventory

(327)

Retired/

Unfunded in

2013?

Legacy System?

Can ERP provide

capability prior to

2018?

Componen

t ERP?

No

No

No

No

No

Strategic

IT Enabler

No

Is this a Required

Unique Capability?

Non-Target(19)

Non-Target(88)

Non-Target (??)

Target Systems(??)

Target Systems(??)

FM or XFunct

Yes

Yes

Yes

Ye

sFM

XFunc

t

No

Target Systems(??)

Target Systems(??)

Yes

Yes

LEGEND

Target Systems (??)

Non-Target Systems (??)

Total Current FM

Inventory (327)

i.e. Std.

Transaction broker,

Bus. Intelligence

tool

No

Non-Target (??)