Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
doc.: IEEE /1227r0 Report Attendance Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 3 November 2015
Citation preview
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
802.11 November 2015 Closing ReportsDate: 2015-11-12
Name Affiliation Address Phone email Adrian Stephens Intel
Corporation +44 792 008
4900 (mobile) [email protected]
Dorothy Stanley HPE (Aruba) +1 630-363-1389
Authors:
Slide 1
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Abstract
• This document is a digest of the closing reports of all 802.11 sub-groups for presentation at the November 2015 closing plenary meeting. Attendance information and liaison reports are also included.
Slide 2
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Attendance
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 3
November 2015Group # Mtgs Avg Total Min MaxARC 2 18 36 17 19Editors Meeting 1 14 14JTC1 1 12 12TGah 4 72 291 14 152TGai 8 20 162 10 32TGaj 4 7 30 6 10TGak 7 8 56 4 14TGaq 7 16 115 5 42TGmc 7 22 157 18 27WNG 1 201 201TGax 11 206 2276 167 254CAC 1 14 14Mid-Week Plenary 1 315 315New Members 1 18 18Opening Plenary 1 296 296TGay 4 66 265 52 82*Tutorials 1 233 233PAR 3 7 21 5 11LRLP 3 45 135 35 60TGaz 3 57 173 26 1063GPP Liason Response AdHoc 1 25 25Joint Meeting with .15 REG 2 43 87 36 51
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Attendance Total
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 4
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Attendance Histogram (Thu)
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 5
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Attendance by Country
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 6
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 7
802.11 WG Editor’s Meeting (Nov ‘15)Date: 2015-11-08
Name Affiliation Address Phone email Peter Ecclesine Cisco Systems 170 W. Tasman Dr.,
MS SJ-14-4, San Jose, CA 95134-1706
+1-408-527-0815 [email protected]
Authors:
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
from slide 1/6 of 11-15-1286 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 8
Volunteer Editor Contacts• TGmc – Adrian Stephens – [email protected], Edward Au –
[email protected], Emily Qi – [email protected] • TGah – Yongho Seok [email protected], Alfred Asterjadhi –
[email protected] • TGai – Lee Armstrong – [email protected], Ping FANG [email protected]• TGaj – Jiamin CHEN – [email protected] , Shiwen He –
[email protected]• TGak – Donald Eastlake – [email protected], Norm Finn – [email protected] • TGaq – Lee Armstrong – [email protected] • TGax – Robert Stacey – [email protected] • TGay – Carlos Cordeiro – [email protected]
• Editors Emeritus:– TGaa – Alex Ashley – [email protected]– TGac – Robert Stacey – [email protected] – TGad – Carlos Cordeiro – [email protected] – TGae – Henry Ptasinski – [email protected] – TGaf – Peter Ecclesine – [email protected] – TGaq – Dan Gal – [email protected]
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
November 2015
from slide 2/6 of 11-15-1286 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
802.11 Style Guide• See 11-09-1034-11-0000-wg11-style-guide.doc
– We updated 802.11 WG Style Guide based on 2012 IEEE Standards Style Manual and consistency changes in final publication of the 802.11 standard
• Editor’s responsibility includes checking the 2014 IEEE Standards Style Manual when creating or updating drafts. https://development.standards.ieee.org/myproject/Public/mytools/draft/styleman.pdf
• Submissions with draft text should conform to both the WG11 Style Guide and IEEE Standards Style Manual
• Note that the Style Guide evolves with our practice
Slide 9 Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
from slide 3/6 of 11-15-1286 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 10
Editor Amendment Ordering
Amendment Number Task Group Projected REVCOM Date
802.11REVmc TGmc - 3718 Jan 2017
802.11-2016 Amendment 1 TGai - 168 Jan 2017
802.11-2016 Amendment 2 TGah - 598 Jan 2017
802.11-2016 Amendment 3 TGaq - 30 Jan 2017
802.11-2016 Amendment 4 TGak - 79 Jan 2017
802.11-2016 Amendment 5 TGaj - 174 Jun 2017
802.11-2016 Amendment 6 TGax Mar 2019
• Data as of Nov 2015• See http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/802.11_Timelines.htm• In Nov 2015, Editors changed the running order and will revisit in July 2016,
maintaining this order in the interim
Amendment numbering is editorial! No need to make ballot comments on these dynamic numbers!
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
from slide 4/6 of 11-15-1286 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Most current doc shaded green.
TG Published or Draft Baseline DocumentsSource MDR
Style Guide Editor
Snapshot Date
Publishe
d
mc ai ah aq ak aj ax
ay
az
mc Y 4.3 Frame 12.0 Yes 2012 Adrian StephensEdward Au, Emily Qi
7-Nov
ai N 4.0 6.2 Frame 12.0 Yes 2012 Lee ArmstrongPing FANG
8-Nov
ah N 4.0 5.0 Frame 11.0 Yes 2012 Yongho SeokAlfred Asterjadhi
6-Nov
aq N 4.0 3.0 Frame 12.0 No 2012 Lee Armstrong 8-Nov
ak N 4.0 1.3 Word No 2012 Donald EastlakeNorm Finn
8-Nov
aj N 1.0 Frame 10.0 No 2012 Jiamin ChenShiwen He
12-Nov
ax Y No 2012 Robert Stacey 12-May
ay No 2012 Carlos Cordeiro 6-Nov
az
Changes from last report shown in red.
Nov 2015 Draft Development Snapshot
Slide 11 Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
November 2015
from slide 5/6 of 11-15-1286 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
MIB style, Visio and Frame practices
• I’m going to suggest going forward we use a single style with appropriately set tabs, and use leading Tabs to distinguish the syntax and description parts. (Adrian Stephens Feb 9, 2010)
• Figure in an anchored frame within a table, and use a table caption as a figure caption
• Keep embedded figures using visio as long as possible– Near the end of sponsor ballot, turn these all into .wmf (windows meta
file) format files (you can do this from visio using “save as”). Keep separate files for the .vsd source and the .wmf file that is linked to from frame. There is likelihood we should use .emf
• Frame templates for 11aa, 11ac, 11af • Text version of MIB is available (2012, ae2012, aa2012, ad2012,
acD5.0, afD5.0. mcD3.0)
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 12from slide 6/6 of 11-15-1286 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
ARC Closing Report Date: 2015-11-11
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Mark Hamilton Ruckus Wireless 350 W. Java Dr.
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 +1-303-818-8472
Authors:
from slide 1/6 of 11-15-1438 by Mark Hamilton (Ruckus)
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 13
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Abstract
This document is the closing report for ARC SC, November 2015, Dallas meeting
from slide 2/6 of 11-15-1438 by Mark Hamilton (Ruckus)
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 14
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Work Completed• Agenda is here: https://
mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1234-03-0arc-arc-sc-agenda-nov-2015.ppt
• DS-SAP and Annex R as normative text approved– 11-15-0555-06-0arc-normative-ds-sap-proposal.docx – Approved by REVmc for roll in to next Draft
• IETF concerns about 802.11 multicast– Reviewed
11-15-1261-03-0arc-multicast-performance-optimization-features-overview-for-ietf-nov-2015.ppt
– Noted future work is expected, no action at this time• REVmc Figure 5-1:
11-15-0540-05-0arc-updates-to-revmc-5-1-5.docx – Continued review of Figures 5-1, et seq, in REVmc D4.0, in response to
Sponsor Ballot comment– Agreed AP and Mesh STA structure diagrams– Started discussion on Mesh Gate, to be continued
from slide 3/6 of 11-15-1438 by Mark Hamilton (Ruckus)
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 15
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Work Completed• 802.11 as a component
– Presentation: 11-15-1376-00-0arc-update-on-3gpp-ran3-multi-rat-joint-coordination.pptx
– Long discussion on different views of network components and structure:• 3GPP RAN3 view• “5G view”?• OmniRAN view• Device centric versus application/user centric• To be continued …
• MIB Design Pattern work item: No progress this week• Joint meeting with TGak: Started discussion on DS relationship
to 802.1Q bridges. “Where are the DS’ brains?”
from slide 4/6 of 11-15-1438 by Mark Hamilton (Ruckus)
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 16
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Teleconference(s)• One planned. Joint with TGaq to discuss
architectural comments on their LB. Dec 1, 13:00 ET, 90 minutes.
• Any others will schedule with 10 days notice, if needed
from slide 5/6 of 11-15-1438 by Mark Hamilton (Ruckus)
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 17
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
January 2016 Plans• Two standalone meeting slots planned:
– 802.11 as a component in a larger eco-system– Design Pattern for MIB attribute use– 802.11 Architecture topics: Figure 5-1 et seq– DS/AP/Portal architecture discussions
• One joint session with TGak– 802.11ak architecture discussions:
• GLK ESS concept• “Where are a DS’s brains?”
from slide 6/6 of 11-15-1438 by Mark Hamilton (Ruckus)
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 18
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
802.11 PAR Review SC November 2015• Date: 2015-11-12
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 19
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Jon Rosdahl CSR Technologies Inc
a Qualcomm Company 10871 N 5750 W Highland, UT 84003
+1-801-492-4023 [email protected]
Authors:
from slide 1/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Abstract-Snapshot
• Review of Proposed 802 PAR documents -- Nov 8-13, Dallas, TX, USA1. 802d - Amendment: URN Namespace, PAR and CSD2. 802.1CQ- Standard: Multicast and Local Address Assignment, PAR and CSD3. 802.3ca - Amendment, 25 Gb/s and 100 Gb/s Passive Optical Networks, PAR and
CSD4. 802.3cb - Amendment, 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Operation over Backplane and Copper
Cables , PAR and CSD5. 802.15.3d - 100Gbps wireless switched point-to-point physical layer,
PAR Modification and 5C6. 802.15.4t Standard: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs)
Amendment for a High(er) Rate Physical (PHY) Layer, PAR and CSD 7. 802.15.4u Amendment, Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs)
Amendment for use of the Indian 865-867 MHz band. PAR and CSD 8. 802.16s - Amendment, Fixed and Mobile Wireless Access in Channel Sizes up to
1.25 MHz, PAR and CSD• Meeting times: Monday PM2, Tuesday AM2, Thursday AM2
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 20from slide 2/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
PAR Review SC – November 2015Chair: Jon Rosdahl
•Monday Agenda:1. Welcome2. .Nominations for Vice Chair/Secretary3. Determine order of review4. Review PARs/CSD posted for review this week.5. Recess
•Tuesday Agenda:1. Determine Vice Chair/Secretary for this week and beyond2. Complete review of PARs/CSD and post comments to 802 WGs3. Recess
•Thursday Agenda:1. Review Response to Comments2. Prepare Report for 802.11 WG closing plenary3. Adjourn
Slide 21
Draft Agenda:
from slide 3/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
PAR Review Comments
Slide 22from slide 4/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.15.3d - 100Gbps wireless switched point-to-point physical layer, PAR Modification and 5C
• 2.1, 5.2a, 5.2b and 5.5: Use of “Mbps” or “ Gbps” should be “Mb/s” and “Gb/s”
• 5.2a and 5.2b seem to be orders of magnitude different in the expected speeds and bands covered. Should the Scope be amended by this amendment to include the extra bands and speeds? An Amendment is a good time to adjust the scope of the base standard.
• 5.5 – missing comma “In data centers wireless links ----”• 5.5 – extra comma “…with high probability, is ----”• 8.1 – 5.2b – delete “the” in “intended the frequency
bands”• 8.1 – 5.5 - missing comma in “kiosk-downloading the
link” Slide 23from slide 5/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.15.4t Standard: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs) Amendment for a High(er) Rate Physical (PHY) Layer, PAR and
CSD
• 2.1 Need to include range for “High(er)”– (See NesCom Conventions: “6. Quantification of the Ranges of Numeric Values
For PARs for new projects, standards developers who use general terms to represent ranges (e.g. high, medium, low) within the title, scope, or purpose, shall numerically define such ranges where they first appear (title, scope, or purpose, as applicable). “)
• 5.2a – change “devices operating various license-free” to “devices operating in various license-free”
• 5.2a – What is the battery consumption requirements (car battery or coin cell for example)?
• 5.2.b Change “Mbps” to “Mb/s”
Slide 24from slide 6/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
15.4t CSD
• Title page: should it include the name of the amendment?
• 1.1.1 change “Definitions were already and part of this standard “ to “Definitions were already a part of this standard.
Slide 25from slide 7/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.15.4u Amendment, Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs) Amendment for use of the Indian 865-867 MHz band. PAR and
CSD
• 2.1 Change “the Indian 865-867 MHz band” to “the 865-867 MHz band in India.”
• 5.5 – Suggest use “W” for “watts”• 5.5 – Change: “released a draft an Internet of Things
Policy” to “released a draft Internet of Things Policy”
Slide 26from slide 8/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
15.4u CSD
• Title page: should it include the name of the amendment? It would help the reader when looking at CSD to be self-defined.
• 1.1.1 change “Definitions were already and part of this standard “ to “Definitions were already a part of this standard”
• 1.2.5 a) change “This project can be implement with “ to “This project can be implemented with “
• 1.2.5 a) Add comma prior to “which”
Slide 27from slide 9/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.16s - Amendment, Fixed and Mobile Wireless Access in Channel Sizes up to 1.25 MHz, PAR and CSD
• In 2014, 802.16 was in the process of closing down open projects. What evidence do we have for the support of a new project?
• 5.1 – We do not believe that there are 15 interested parties when 802.16 has only 6 members. There may not be enough interest to support this new project. Are you expecting a lot of cross interest from the Micro-wave society?
• 7.1 – 3GPP develops NB-IOT (narrow band LTE for Internet of Things) which is similar in scope to this project scope – from 5.2b: “This system profile will specify operation in exclusively-licensed spectrum with channel sizes up to 1.25 MHz, including 1 MHz explicitly”. How is this project different from the 3GPP case?
Slide 28from slide 10/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.16s CSD• 1.2.1 a) How does this project justify the claimed market share of
the cited studies, given that this appears to be one of many technologies in this competitive market place?
• 1.2.1 b) given that there are only 6 members of 802.16, that does not appear to match the list of “Multiple Vendors and numerous users” categories, what evidence of interests is there from participants in each category?
• 1.2.1 This response could be enhanced by including and building on the statement from 1.2.4 b) “At least five utilities in the US have either deployed or are testing a proprietary system based on a variation of IEEE 802.16 technology.”
• 1.2.4 – Concern that the statements are somewhat vague. Is there evidence that could be identified for the cited systems? How much of a “variation” in the system is cited? Could supporting documents be cited from 802.16 document repository?
Slide 29from slide 11/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802d - Amendment: URN Namespace, PAR and CSD
• 1.1 Correct Project number – P802d• 2.1 Expand first use of Abbreviation – Uniform
Resource Names (URN)• 5.2.b Change “bridges and end stations” to “802 Network
elements”. This is to avoid the need to list all types of devices, e.g. Access Points (AP), switches etc.
• 8.1 #5.5 delete second sentence, ”YANG” does not appear in the title.
• 8.1 #7.3A delete “with communication with JTC1 through existing channels”, or remove the entire comment as 7.3 does not appear on the PDF of the PAR.
Slide 30from slide 12/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802d CSD
• 1.1.1 – This project may be apply to more than 802.1Q, change “802.1Q to “802”.
Slide 31from slide 13/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.1CQ- Standard: Multicast and Local Address Assignment, PAR and CSD
• 2.1 change “Addresses” to “Address”• 5.6 change last sentence to read: “This includes software
developers, networking equipment vendors IC developers, bridge and NIC vendors, and users.
• CSD: Slide 9: spell out “CIDs” – “Company Identifier (CID)”
• CSD: Slide 9: identify properly where the address is coming from.. Change “RAC” to “IEEE-SA Registration Authority”.
Slide 32from slide 14/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.3ca - Amendment, 25 Gb/s and 100 Gb/s Passive Optical Networks, PAR and CSD
• No comment or issues identified.
Slide 33from slide 15/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.3cb - Amendment, 2.5 Gb/s and 5 Gb/s Operation over Backplane and Copper Cables , PAR and CSD
• No comment or issues identified.
•CSD Slide 5: Well Done --
Slide 34from slide 16/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Motion to accept feedback
• Move to accept the feedback in 11-15/1212r2 (slides 5-16) as the feedback on the proposed PARs for the November 2015 Plenary.
• Moved: Andrew Myles 2nd: Dorothy Stanley• Results: 4-0-0 motion passes
Slide 35from slide 17/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Responses From 802 WGs
Slide 36from slide 18/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.1
Slide 37
Thanks to all who reviewed the IEEE 802d PAR and CSD. The updated 802d PAR has been pre-submitted to NesCom and as a result, only the NesCom admin can currently change the PAR. A request to update the PAR has been made based on this change bar version: http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2015/new-parsons-URN-Namespace-PAR-1115.pdf The CSD has been updated as follows: http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2015/new-parsons-URN-Namespace-CSD-1115.pdf The consolidated comments received from 802.3, 802.11, 802.16 and James Gilb, along with resolutions are here:http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2015/new-parsons-URN-Namespace-PAR-comments-1115-v01.pdf Cheers,Glenn.
from slide 19/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802d - Amendment: URN Namespace, PAR and CSD
• 1.1 Correct Project number – P802d - Agree • 2.1 Expand first use of Abbreviation – Uniform
Resource Names (URN) - Agree • 5.2.b Change “bridges and end stations” to “802 Network
elements”. This is to avoid the need to list all types of devices, e.g. Access Points (AP), switches etc. - Agree
• 8.1 #5.5 delete second sentence, ”YANG” does not appear in the title. - Agree
• 8.1 #7.3A delete “with communication with JTC1 through existing channels”, or remove the entire comment as 7.3 does not appear on the PDF of the PAR.
• Agree. 7.3 exists and does not appear due to staff choice… so this note is not necessary Slide 38
from slide 20/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802d CSD
• 1.1.1 – This project may be apply to more than 802.1Q, change “802.1Q to “802”. - Agree
Slide 39from slide 21/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.1CQ
Slide 40
Thanks to all who reviewed the IEEE 802.1CQ PAR and CSD. The consolidated comments with responses are posted at:http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2015/dcb-thaler-1cq-comments-1115.pdf The PAR with changes marked up is at:http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2015/dcb-thaler-1CQ-par-local-address-prot-1115-v0.pdf and the updated CSD is at:http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2015/dcb-thaler-1CQ-csd-local-address-prot-1115.pdf Regards,Pat
from slide 22/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.1CQ- Standard: Multicast and Local Address Assignment, PAR and CSD
• 2.1 change “Addresses” to “Address” - Accept• 5.6 change last sentence to read: “This includes software
developers, networking equipment vendors IC developers, bridge and NIC vendors, and users. - Accept
• CSD: Slide 9: spell out “CIDs” – “Company Identifier (CID)”
• Will expand to Company ID which is the RAC • name for the identifiers• CSD: Slide 9: identify properly where the address is
coming from.. Change “RAC” to “IEEE-SA Registration Authority”.
• - Accept Slide 41from slide 23/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.3
Slide 42
The updated IEEE P802.3ca PAR can be access at <http://www.ieee802.org/3/NGEPONSG/documents/P802_3ca_PAR_111115.pdf>The unchanged IEEE P802.3ca CSD can be access at <http://www.ieee802.org/3/NGEPONSG/documents/100gepon_CSD.pdf>The IEEE P802.3ca comment responses can be accessed at <http://www.ieee802.org/secmail/msg19576.html>
The updated IEEE P802.3cb PAR can be access at <http://www.ieee802.org/3/CU4HDDSG/P802_3cb_PAR_280915a.pdf>The updated IEEE P802.3cb CSD can be access at <http://www.ieee802.org/3/CU4HDDSG/CU4HDD%20SG-CSD-v1-2.pdf>The IEEE P802.3cb comment responses can be accessed at <http://www.ieee802.org/secmail/msg19569.html>
from slide 24/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.16s
Slide 43
Thanks to those who submitted comments on the draft P802.16s PAR.
Please see: P802.16s Draft PAR: Comments and Responses https://mentor.ieee.org/802.16/dcn/15/16-15-0050-00.pdf
Draft P802.16s PAR https://mentor.ieee.org/802.16/dcn/15/16-15-0051-00.pdf
Draft P802.16s CSD https://mentor.ieee.org/802.16/dcn/15/16-15-0052-00.pdf
Comments and responses are also consolidated in a table at: http://comments16s.wirelessman.org
Roger
from slide 25/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.16 responses:• 802.11 Comment: In 2014, 802.16 was in the process of closing down open
projects. What evidence do we have for the support of a new project?
• Response: There is a clear market requirement and interest in this work. Over 100 utilities have deployed 802.16 to support their grid operations. Changes to the 3.65 GHz band have left utilities looking for other options for licensed spectrum. The 700 MHz upper A block has been purchased by some utilities, but the 1 MHz channel width is not currently supported by any standard. 23 people, from four utilities, five equipment vendors, and several other organizations attended the teleconferences to develop this PAR. Please see 802.16-15-0049-00-Gdoc and scroll down to the attendance list.
Slide 44from slide 26/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.16s – 5.1• 802.11 Comment: • We do not believe that there are 15 interested parties when 802.16
has only 6 members. There may not be enough interest to support this new project. Are you expecting a lot of cross interest from the Microwave Society?
• Response: 23 people, from four utilities, five equipment vendors, and several other organizations attended the teleconferences to develop this PAR.
• Please see 802.16-15-0049-00-Gdoc and scroll down to the attendance list. The equipment vendors have expressed their intention to actively participate in the development, in addition to existing members of 802.16. We also expect a few participants from academic and international research institutes.
Slide 45from slide 27/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.16s – 7.1• 802.11 Comment: 3GPP develops NB-IOT (narrow band LTE for Internet of
Things) which is similar in scope to this project scope – from 5.2b: “This system profile will specify operation in exclusively-licensed spectrum with channel sizes up to 1.25 MHz, including 1 MHz explicitly”. How is this project different from the 3GPP case?
• Response: NB-IOT is not of similar scope. This project is to amend the 802.16 standard. 3GPP standards are not compatible with the 802.16 standard.
Slide 46from slide 28/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.16 – 1.2.1 a)
• 802.11 Comment: a) How does this project justify the claimed market share of the cited studies, given that this appears to be one of many technologies in this competitive market place?
• Response: The statistic in 1.2.1 is not claiming a projected market for this amendment - it is an example of the overall market size. The marketplace for network infrastructure suitable for critical applications that supports narrow channels is competitive, but currently offers only proprietary solutions. The industry desires a standard to allow choice of vendors and better control of the product lifecycle
Slide 47from slide 29/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.16s – 1.2.1 b)
• 802.11 Comment: b) given that there are only 6 members of 802.16, that does not appear to match the list of “Multiple Vendors and numerous users” categories, what evidence of interests is there from participants in each category?
• Response: 23 people, from four utilities, five equipment vendors, and several other organizations attended the teleconferences to develop this PAR. Please see 802.16-15-0049-00-Gdoc and scroll down to the attendance list. The equipment vendors have expressed their intention to actively participate in the development, in addition to existing members of 802.16. We also expect a few participants from academic and international research institutes.
Slide 48from slide 30/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.16s – 1.2.1
• 802.11 Comment: This response could be enhanced by including and building on the statement from 1.2.4 b) “At least five utilities in the US have either deployed or are testing a proprietary system based on a variation of IEEE 802.16 technology.”
• Response: Salt River Project and Great River Energy have explicitly indicated their support by posting to Mentor and on the 802.16 reflector. Puget Sound Electric and BC Hydro (Power Tech Labs) have been involved in the PAR definition process. Several other utilities are in phases of negotiation and are not publically expressing their interest at this time.
• Proposed Change: Add text to CSD 1.2.1b: Six posts expressing support for this standardization activity have been posted to 802.16 Mentor and the 802.16 reflector
Slide 49from slide 31/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.16s -1.2.4
• 802.11 Comment: Concern that the statements are somewhat vague. Is there evidence that could be identified for the cited systems? How much of a “variation” in the system is cited? Could supporting documents be cited from 802.16 document repository?
• Response: The proprietary system used as an example of feasibility is described in 802.16 contribution 802.16-15-0035-00-Gcon. Other vendors have somewhat different approaches that will be considered in the Task Group.
• Proposed Change: Add reference to this document to CSD: "See 802.16 contribution 802.16-15-0035-00-Gcon for further details."
Slide 50from slide 32/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.15 RESPONSES
Slide 51from slide 33/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Comments from 802.11 on 802.15.3d100Gb/s wireless switched point-to-point physical layer
• 2.1, 5.2a, 5.2b and 5.5: Use of “Mbps” or “ Gbps” should be “Mb/s” and “Gb/s”
Response: Editorial correction made• 5.2a and 5.2b seem to be orders of magnitude different in the expected
speeds and bands covered. Should the Scope be amended by this amendment to include the extra bands and speeds? An Amendment is a good time to adjust the scope of the base standard.
Response: We do not agree that action is needed now. 5.2a is the scope of the base standard as it appears in the current 15.3 Revision and in amendment 15.3e. As such, it is not something that can be changed predictably via an amendment especially since it is dependent on the order of completion of the amendments. While the speed is significantly higher, it is still above above 200 Mb/s specified in the base standard scope, so there no misstatement. The proper place to make this update is in the next revision.
Slide 52from slide 34/46 by Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Comments from 802.11 on 802.15.3d100Gb/s wireless switched point-to-point physical layer
• 5.5 – missing comma “In data centers wireless links ----”• 5.5 – extra comma “…with high probability, is ----”• 8.1 – 5.2b – delete “the” in “intended the frequency bands”• 8.1 – 5.5 - missing comma in “kiosk-downloading the link”Response: Editorial corrections made
Slide 53from slide 35/46 by Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Comments from 802.11 on 802.15.4t Standard: Amendment for a Higher Rate Physical (PHY) Layer
• PAR: 2.1 Need to include range for “High(er)”– (See NesCom Conventions: “6. Quantification of the Ranges of Numeric Values
For PARs for new projects, standards developers who use general terms to represent ranges (e.g. high, medium, low) within the title, scope, or purpose, shall numerically define such ranges where they first appear (title, scope, or purpose, as applicable”).
Response: Noted. “Target range should be at least 10 meters.” added to scope• PAR: 5.2a – change “devices operating various license-
free” to “devices operating in various license-free”Response: Agree in Principal. Hard to predict whether this typo correction will stick since the order of 15.4 amendment completion is unknown. In any event we will make the correction in the next revision.
Slide 54from slide 36/46 by Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Comments from 802.11 on 802.15.4t Standard: Amendment for a Higher Rate Physical (PHY) Layer
• PAR: 5.2a – What is the battery consumption requirements (car battery or coin cell for example)?
Response: Base standard scope is not something we can reliably modify through an amendment. We will address this in the scope of the next revision.• PAR: 5.2.b Change “Mbps” to “Mb/s”Response: Change made
Slide 55from slide 37/46 by Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Comments from 802.11 on 802.15.4t Standard: Amendment for a Higher Rate Physical (PHY) Layer
• CSD Title page: should it include the name of the amendment?
Response: No reason why not. Amendment title added• CSD: 1.1.1 change “Definitions were already and part
of this standard “ to “Definitions were already a part of this standard.
Response: This comment is no longer relevant. 1.1.1a was changed to read: “While no new managed objects are anticipated, any managed objects that are required will be defined as part of the project.” to satisfy other comments received
Slide 56from slide 38/46 by Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.11 comments on the 802.15.4u PAR/CSDAmendment for use of the 865-867 MHz band in India
• 2.1 Change “the Indian 865-867 MHz band” to “the 865-867 MHz band in India.”
Response: Agree. Change made• 5.5 – Suggest use “W” for “watts”Response: We appreciate the suggestion but feel using the full word is clearer• 5.5 – Change: “released a draft an Internet of Things
Policy” to “released a draft Internet of Things Policy”Response: Agree. Change made
Slide 57from slide 39/46 by Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.11 comments on the 802.15.4u PAR/CSDAmendment for use of the 865-867 MHz band in India
• CSD: Title page: should it include the name of the amendment? It would help the reader when looking at CSD to be self-defined.
Response: No reason why not. Title added• CSD: 1.1.1 change “Definitions were already and part
of this standard “ to “Definitions were already a part of this standard”
Response: This comment is no longer relevant. 1.1.1a was changed to read: “While no new managed objects are anticipated, any managed objects that are required will be defined as part of the project.” to satisfy other comments received
Slide 58from slide 40/46 by Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.11 comments on the 802.15.4u PAR/CSDAmendment for use of the 865-867 MHz band in India
• CSD: 1.2.5 a) change “This project can be implement with “ to “This project can be implemented with “
Response: Accepted, correction made• 1.2.5 a) Add comma prior to “which”Response: Accepted, correction made
Slide 59from slide 41/46 by Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.11 REBUTTAL
Slide 60from slide 42/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.15.4t
• 802.11 comment: PAR: 2.1 Need to include range for “High(er)”– (See NesCom Conventions: “6. Quantification of the Ranges of Numeric Values
For PARs for new projects, standards developers who use general terms to represent ranges (e.g. high, medium, low) within the title, scope, or purpose, shall numerically define such ranges where they first appear (title, scope, or purpose, as applicable”).
802.15 Response: Noted. “Target range should be at least 10 meters.” added to scope802.11 Rebuttal: The requirement is to put the range where it “first appears”, so either put the range in the title, or change the title to not require the use of “High(er)”.
Slide 61from slide 43/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802.16s – 7.1• 802.11 Comment: 3GPP develops NB-IOT (narrow band LTE for Internet of
Things) which is similar in scope to this project scope – from 5.2b: “This system profile will specify operation in exclusively-licensed spectrum with channel sizes up to 1.25 MHz, including 1 MHz explicitly”. How is this project different from the 3GPP case?
• 802.16 Response: NB-IOT is not of similar scope. This project is to amend the 802.16 standard. 3GPP standards are not compatible with the 802.16 standard.
• 802.11 Rebuttal: NB-IOT is of similar scope and has similar use cases in the same band. Therefore, it should be identified in 7.1. However, we recognize that the identified stakeholders appear to have a need for an 802.16 based solution, and the competing solution may not meet their needs. We suggest you include this information in 7.1 because it explains why this amendment to 802.16 may be justified.
Slide 62from slide 44/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Motion to Submit Report to WG
• Move to accept doc:11-15/1212r3 as the feedback including rebuttal on the proposed PARs for the November 2015 802 Plenary.
• Moved: Andrew Myles 2nd: Stuart Kerry• Results: 5-0-0 Motion Passes
Slide 63from slide 45/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
References• IEEE 802 PARs Under consideration Webpage:
– http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/PARs.shtml
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 64from slide 46/46 by Jon Rosdahl, CSR-Qualcomm
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 65
IEEE 802.11/15 Regulatory SCDallas Closing Report
Date: 2015-10-13Authors:
from slide 1/8 of 11-15-1209 by Rich Kennedy, MediaTek
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 66
Abstract
This presentation is the closing report for the November 2015 IEEE 802.11/15 Regulatory Standing Committee meeting in Dallas.
from slide 2/8 of 11-15-1209 by Rich Kennedy, MediaTek
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Agenda
• The regulatory summaries– FCC 15-105 re LTE-U– FCC 15-92 administrative changes– FCC 15-138 bands above 24GHz– ETSI ERM TG11 Status of (EN 300 328 (2.4 GHz)– ETSI TC BRAN Status (EN301 893, 302 567 and 301 598)– Globalstar
• 802 EC Regulatory SC discussion• Actions required
– Preparation for November ETSI ERM TG11 meeting– Preparation for December ETSI TC BRAN meeting
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 67from slide 3/8 of 11-15-1209 by Rich Kennedy, MediaTek
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Regulatory Updates• FCC 15-105 re LTE-U
– Closed but many ex partes filed of LTE-U fairness• FCC 15-92 administrative changes
– Reply Comments closed 11/9• FCC 15-138 bands above 24GHz
– Sub-group will bring contribution– No input was received
• ETSI ERM TG11 Status of (EN 300 328)– Receiver requirements and WIA Hybrid FH– Meetings November 16-18, 2015, January 19-22, 2016
• ETSI TC BRAN Status (EN301 893, 302 567 and 301 598)– Receiver requirements and 5 GHz coexistence– Meetings December 14-18, 2015, February 8-12, 2016
• Globalstar – still awaiting FCC decisionAdrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 68from slide 4/8 of 11-15-1209 by Rich Kennedy, MediaTek
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
EC Regulatory SC Mission Statement
• EC subcommittee looking at improving regulatory activity and proactivity
• 802.11/15 Regulatory SC developed a problem statement and Mission Statement– https://
mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1433-01-0000-regulatory-sc-mission-statement.pptx
– Approved by the SC 17/0/13– Motion for WG approval to send to the EC
• Uncertain when this will be voted by EC– Talk of a new subcommittee to draft– Monday EC meeting said vote would be at Friday EC meeting
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 69from slide 5/8 of 11-15-1209 by Rich Kennedy, MediaTek
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
SC Motion
• Approve document 11-15-1433-01-0reg-regulatory-sc-mission-statement-from-802-11 as the Regulatory SC input to the 802.11 and 802.15 WGs, as their input to the EC discussion on a regulatory mission statement.
• Moved by: Jim Petranovich• Seconded by: Mike Montemurro• Discussion?• Vote: 17 Y 0 N 13 A
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 70from slide 6/8 of 11-15-1209 by Rich Kennedy, MediaTek
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
802.11 WG Motion
• Approve document 11-15-1433-01-0reg-regulatory-sc-mission-statement-from-802-11 as the 802.11 WG as their input to the EC discussion on a regulatory mission statement.
• Moved by Rich Kennedy on behalf of the Regulatory SC
• Seconded by:• Discussion?• Vote: Y N A
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 71from slide 7/8 of 11-15-1209 by Rich Kennedy, MediaTek
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Teleconferences
• Changed to weekly on Thursdays, 12:30 to 13:30 ET
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 72from slide 8/8 of 11-15-1209 by Rich Kennedy, MediaTek
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 73
Closing ReportDate: 2015-11-13
Name Company Address Phone email
Jim Lansford CSR Technology – A Qualcomm Company
100 Stirrup Circle Florissant, CO 80816
+1-719-286-8660
Authors:
from slide 1/4 of 11-15-1456 by Jim Lansford, Chair (CSR-Qualcomm)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 74
Abstract
Closing report for WNG SC for November 2015, Dallas, Texas USA
from slide 2/4 of 11-15-1456 by Jim Lansford, Chair (CSR-Qualcomm)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 75
Final Agendahttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1231-02-0wng-agenda-for-wng-2015-11.ppt
Vice Chair ElectionLei Wang (Marvell) was elected Vice-chair, which was confirmed at the mid-week plenary
Presentations at September 2015 meeting1. “Packet appending in bit-interleaved coded modulation,” Matt Krasicki, Poznan University of Technology
• https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1264-01-0wng-packet-appending-for-bicm-id.pptx
• Straw poll – continue work? Y/N/A: 7/1/many
2. “Low-power wake-up receiver for 802.11,” Minyoung Park, Intel• https://
mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1307-01-0wng-low-power-wake-up-receiver-for-802-11.pptx
• Straw poll – Should this be standardized? Y/N/A: 65/1/51
3. “Thoughts on 802.11 in a 3GPP 5G Network,” Joseph Levy, Interdigital• https://
mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1402-00-0wng-thoughts-on-802-11-in-a-3gpp-5g-network.pptx
from slide 3/4 of 11-15-1456 by Jim Lansford, Chair (CSR-Qualcomm)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Additional Information
• Actions– No conference calls scheduled– No motions
• Minutes– 15/1417r0
• Plans for January 2016– Call for presentations will be made in advance
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 76from slide 4/4 of 11-15-1456 by Jim Lansford, Chair (CSR-Qualcomm)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 77
IEEE 802 JTC1 SC closing report(Nov 2015)Date: 2015-11-13
Name Company email
Andrew Myles Cisco [email protected]
Authors:
from slide 1/6 of 11-15-1461 by Andrew Myles, Cisco
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 78
Abstract
Closing report for IEEE 802 JTC1 SCfor Nov 2015 in Dallas
from slide 2/6 of 11-15-1461 by Andrew Myles, Cisco
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
The SC did not have a great deal of work this week and only one session was required• Reviewed status of PSDO pipeline
– 802 passed FDIS– 802.1BA and 802.1BR passed 60 day pre-ballot– Responses comments were discussed and will be approved by
802.1 WG– 802.22a, 802.22b will be submitted to FDIS– 802.3bx will be submitted to FDIS soon
• Reviewed agenda for SC6 meeting in Mar 2016– It is likely that IEEE 802 will not have any reps– Agenda is very light so far– We will review submitted documents at January meeting
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 79from slide 3/6 of 11-15-1461 by Andrew Myles, Cisco
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
IEEE 802 has pushed 16 standards completely through the PSDO ratification process …
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
802 standard 60 day pre-ballot 5 month FDIS ballot Comments resolved
802.11 2012 2012 Nov 2013802.1X 2013 21 Oct 2013 Jan 2014802.1AE 2013 21 Oct 2013 Jan 2014802.1AB May 2013 18 Dec 2013 May 2014802.1AR May 2013 18 Dec 2013 May 2014802.1AS May 2013 18 Dec 2013 May 2014802.3 2013 16 Feb 2014 Not required802.11aa Feb 2013 28 Jan 2014 July 2014802.11ad Feb 2013 28 Jan 2014 July 2014802.11ae Feb 2013 28 Jan 2014 July 2014802.22 May 2014 Feb 2015 Not required802.1AEbw Jan 2014 Feb 2015 Apr 2015802.1AEbn Jan 2014 Feb 2015 Apr 2015802.3.1 Oct 2014 Jun 2015 Apr 2015802.11ac Sep 2014 Jul 2015 Jul 2015802.11af Sep 2014 Jul 2015 Jul 2015
from slide 4/6 of 11-15-1461 by Andrew Myles, Cisco
November 2015
Slide 80 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
… and has 9 standards in the pipeline for ratification under the PSDO
IEEE 802standard
60 daypre-ballot
5 monthFDIS ballot
Comments resolved
802 Passed Oct 2014 Passed 2 Nov 15 Will be sent in Nov
802.1Xbx Passed 19 Mar 15 Closes 28 Jan 16 Sent in Jun 2015
802.1Q-Rev Passed 13 Mar 15 Closes 28 Jan 16 Sent in Jun 2015
802.1AX Passed 30 May 15 Closes 20 Nov 15 No comments
802.1BA Passed 23 Sep 15 - - Will be sent in Nov
802.1BR Passed 23 Sep 15 - - Will be sent in Nov
802.22a In process - - - -
802.22b In process - - - -
802.3bx In process
from slide 5/6 of 11-15-1461 by Andrew Myles, Cisco
November 2015
Slide 81 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
The SC will focus in Atlanta on PSDO processes & prep’ing for next SC6 meeting • Continue executing PSDO processes• Prepare for next SC6 meeting
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 82from slide 6/6 of 11-15-1461 by Andrew Myles, Cisco
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 83
IEEE 802.11mc Closing Report forNovember 2015
Date: 2015-11-12
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Dorothy Stanley
Hewlett Packard Enterprise -Aruba
1322 Crossman Ave Sunnyvale, CA 94089
+1 630-363-1389
Authors:
from slide 1/5 of 11-15-1464 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE- Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 84
Abstract
This document contains the TGmc closing report for November 2015.
from slide 2/5 of 11-15-1464 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE- Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Status• Continued comment resolution on Initial SB comments• Agenda, includes motions
– https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1223-08-000m-tgmc-agenda-november-2015.pptx
• Comment resolution spreadsheet– https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-0532-20-000m-revmc-spon
sor-ballot-comments.xls
– Approximately 1550 comments resolved to date of ~1900
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 85from slide 3/5 of 11-15-1464 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE- Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 86
TGmc Plan of Record - modified• 20 July 2012 – 12 Sept 2012 – Call for Comment/Input• 29-30 Aug 2012 – NesCom, SASB PAR Approval• Sept 2012 – Begin to process CC input, 11aa, 11ae integration• Dec 2012 – March/May 2013 – 11ad integration • Jan 2013 – First WG Letter ballot - without 11ad – on D1.0• Sept 2013 – Letter ballot on D2.0• Dec 2013 – May 2014 – 11ac, 11af integration – D3.0 in May 2014• July 2014 – Mandatory Draft Review• Jan 2015 – D4.0 Recirculation• Form Sponsor Pool: Open Dec 15th or so, close Feb 20, 2015 –
good for 6 months (end of July 2015) • Initial Sponsor Ballot 2015-03-27 through 2015-04-26• December 7-10 2015 Piscataway meeting planned • Targeting December 2015 SB recirculation• July 2016 – WG/EC Final Approval• September 2016 – RevCom/SASB Approval
from slide 4/5 of 11-15-1464 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE- Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Teleconferences and next steps
• November - December– Continue initial Sponsor Ballot comment resolution as Comment
Resolution Committee• Conference Calls 10am Eastern (2 hours)
– November 20, 30• BRC meeting Dec 7-10, Piscataway NJ
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 87from slide 5/5 of 11-15-1464 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE- Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 88
IEEE 802.11ah Closing Report forNovember 2015
Date: 2015-11-13Authors:
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Yongho Seok NEWRACOM 9008 Research Dr Irvine, CA
92618 +949-237-0641 [email protected]
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 1/6 of 11-15-1453 by Yongho Seok (NEWRACOM)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
AbstractThis presentation is the closing report for the Dallas
meeting of the IEEE 802.11 TGah.
November 2015
Slide 89from slide 2/6 of 11-15-1453 by Yongho Seok (NEWRACOM)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Activity in TGah
• Sponsor Ballot for Draft 5.0 closed November 5 – 552 comments received
• Total 226 comments with 7 submissions addressed in this week– 326 comments unresolved after November F2F meeting
• SB0 comment spreadsheet: 11-15/1292r0– Regarding the IP related comment (CID 8286), TGah BRC
approved to forward that comment to IEEE-SA PatCom for consideration at December 2015 meeting and ask for feedback for resolving that CID
• Instructed the editor to generate Draft 5.1
Slide 90 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 3/6 of 11-15-1453 by Yongho Seok (NEWRACOM)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Going forward
• Resolve 326 remaining comments during teleconferences and January F2F meeting (if necessary) and start a Recirculation Sponsor Ballot
Slide 91 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 4/6 of 11-15-1453 by Yongho Seok (NEWRACOM)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Teleconference
• Weekly teleconferences between Nov 24th 2015 and March 8th 2016– Tuesday 8PM ET for 2.5 hours
Slide 92 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 5/6 of 11-15-1453 by Yongho Seok (NEWRACOM)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
TGah Timeline – Updated
• Internal Task Group Ballot : May 2013• Initial Letter Ballot : September 2013• Initial Recirculation Letter Ballot : September 2014 • Initial Sponsor Ballot : November October 2015 • Initial Recirculation Sponsor Ballot : March January
2016• EC Approval : July 2016• Revcom Approval : July 2016
Slide 93 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 6/6 of 11-15-1453 by Yongho Seok (NEWRACOM)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
IEEE 802.11TGaiClosing Report
Date: 2015-11-13Authors:
Name Company Address Phone emailHiroshi MANO Koden
Techno Info K.K.
Fuji Blg 28 2F, 2-7-26 Kita-Aoyama, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 107-0061, Japan
+81-3-6890-0594
[email protected]@manosan.org
November 2015
Slide 94 Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
from slide 1/10 of 11-15-1462 by Hiroshi Mano (KDTI)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
AbstractThis presentation is the closing report for the Dallas
meeting of the IEEE 802.11 TGai.
November 2015
Slide 95 Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
from slide 2/10 of 11-15-1462 by Hiroshi Mano (KDTI)
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
IEEE 802.11 FILS TGai – Nov 2015 Dallas
• Goals for the Meeting:– Approve minutes of past meeting and teleconference– Comment resolution of 1st sponsor LB – Approve Timeline– Approve Teleconference schedule– Approve Plan for Jan
Slide 96 Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
from slide 3/10 of 11-15-1462 by Hiroshi Mano (KDTI)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Accomplishments TGai 1/2
• 1Adhoc + 7 regular slots• Approve TGai Meeting Minutes for the IEEE 802.11
Waikoloa meeting: 15-0849r1– https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-0894-01-00ai-july-2015-
waikoloa-session-minutes.doc• Approve TGai teleconference meeting minutes of
Waikoloa to Dallas meeting : 15-1007r6– https://
mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1007-06-00ai-july-november-teleconference-minutes.doc
November 2015
Slide 97from slide 4/10 of 11-15-1462 by Hiroshi Mano (KDTI)
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Accomplishments TGai 2/2• D6.2 was opened in WG members area.• Received 760 comments by1st SB
– Resolved 270 comments by CRC (Teleco Sep-Nov)– Resolved 200 comments (Dallas)– 248 open comments
• Approved Plan for Jan 2016• Approved Time line• Approved Teleconference schedule
November 2015
Slide 98from slide 5/10 of 11-15-1462 by Hiroshi Mano (KDTI)
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Plan for Jan
• Goals for the Meeting:– Approve minutes of past meeting and teleconference– Comment resolution of 1st sponsor LB– Approve to forward the Recirc sponsor LB– Approve Timeline– Approve Teleconference schedule– Approve Plan for Mar
Slide 99 Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
from slide 6/10 of 11-15-1462 by Hiroshi Mano (KDTI)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Time line of TGai (No Change)PAR Approved, Modified, or Extended 2010-12-08– WG Letter Ballots Initial / Recirc Mar14/Sep14/Jan15/
Mar15/Jul15/Aug15– MEC Done Nov14– Form Sponsor Ballot Pool / Reform Mar15– IEEE-SA Sponsor Ballots Initial / Recirc Sep 15/Mar 16/Jul 16/Sep 16– Final 802.11 WG Approval Aug 16– final or Conditional 802 EC Approval July 16– RevCom & Standards Board Final or
Continuous Process Approval Sep 16– ANSI Approved N/A
Slide 100
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
from slide 7/10 of 11-15-1462 by Hiroshi Mano (KDTI)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Teleconference Schedule • Motion:
– Approve the following schedule of weekly teleconferences on• 24th Nov, 1st Dec, 8th Dec, 15th Dec, 5th Jan, 12th Jan and 26th Jan.
– Tuesdays 10:00 ET– Duration 1.0Hour– Using WEB-EX that will be provided by Task Group Chair
• Approved by unanimous consent
• Tokyo - 12:00AM (24:00 Tuesday)• Beijing - 11:00PM• Berlin - 4:00PM• New York - 10:00AM• San Francisco - 7:00AM
November 2015
Slide 101
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
from slide 8/10 of 11-15-1462 by Hiroshi Mano (KDTI)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Reference
• TGai-Motion-deck– https://
mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-1186-35-00ai-tgai-motion-deck.pptx
• TGai comments from SB– https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1196-17-00ai-tgai-co
mments-from-1st-sb.xlsx
• D6.2 – http://www.ieee802.org/11/private/Draft_Standards
/11ai/Draft%20P802.11ai_D6.2.pdf
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 102 from slide 9/10 of 11-15-1462 by Hiroshi Mano (KDTI)
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Thanks to all who participated!
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 103 from slide 10/10 of 11-15-1462 by Hiroshi Mano (KDTI)
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 104
IEEE 802.11aj November 2015 Closing Report
Date: 2015-11-12
Author:
from slide 1/8 of 11-15-1444 by Xiaoming Peng (I2R)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 105
Abstract
This document is the TGaj closing report for the November 2015 session.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 2/8 of 11-15-1444 by Xiaoming Peng (I2R)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 106
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Work Completed
The following resolutions and proposals have been presented• 11-15/1036r2 - TGaj Editor Report for CC22• 11-15/1021r2 – D0.6 comment database• 11-15/1245r1 - Proposed Resolution to CID 2 on TGaj D0.6 in CC22• 15-1406/r0 Proposed text improvements for CID 147 in CC12• 15-1407/r0 Proposed text improvements for CID 145 in CC12• 15-1408/r0 Proposed text improvements for CID 143 in CC12• 11-15/1256r2 - General Description for QMG STA• 11-15/1366r0 – Proposed amendments for CDMG STAs in clause 4 and 6 of
TGaj draft• 11-15/1367r0 – Proposed amendments to TGaj Draft according to the 11ad
related comment resolutions in REVmc• 11-15-1443-00-00aj-Summary of Changes and Comments from CC12-CC20-
CC22 for 802.11aj draft
from slide 3/8 of 11-15-1444 by Xiaoming Peng (I2R)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Motion• To approve the following comment resolutions and proposals to be
incorporated into TGaj technical draft– 15-1406/r0 Proposed text improvements for CID 147 in CC12– 15-1407/r0 Proposed text improvements for CID 145 in CC12– 15-1408/r0 Proposed text improvements for CID 143 in CC12– 11-15/1245r2 Proposed Resolution to CID 2 in CC22– 11-15/1366r0 Proposed amendments for CDMG STAs in clause 4 and 6 of TGaj
draft– 11-15/1367r0 Proposed amendments to TGaj Draft according to the 11ad related
comment resolutions in REVmc– 11-15/1256r4 General Description for QMG STA– 11-15/1258r0 Text Refinements for CDMG AP or PCP clustering– 11-15/1255r0 Proposed-cdmg-capabilities-element-format
Moved: Jiamin CHEN Seconded: Haiming WANG Results: Y6 N0 A0Motion passed
Slide 107
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 4/8 of 11-15-1444 by Xiaoming Peng (I2R)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
TGaj Motion for WG Letter Ballot• Having approved comment resolutions for all of the
comments received from comment collecting on P802.11aj D0.01 (CC12), D0.2 (CC19), D0.5 (CC20) and D0.6 (CC22) as specified in 11-15/1443r0
• Instruct the editor to prepare P802.11aj D1.0, and• Approve a 30 day Working Group Technical Letter Ballot
asking the question “Should P802.11aj D1.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”
• Moved: Jiamin Chen• Seconded: Haiming Wang• Result: Y7 N0 A0• Motion passed
Slide 108
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 5/8 of 11-15-1444 by Xiaoming Peng (I2R)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Goals for January 2016 Meeting
• Comment Resolution for 802.11aj D1.0 initial WG Letter Ballot
• Review Task Group Timeline
• Discussion on MDR Review
Slide 109
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 6/8 of 11-15-1444 by Xiaoming Peng (I2R)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Next Meeting for TGaj
• Date: Jan 27-28, 2016
• Location: Harbin China
Slide 110
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 7/8 of 11-15-1444 by Xiaoming Peng (I2R)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Conference Call Time
– 14 Jan 2016 9pm ET (15 Jan 2016 9am Beijing Time)
Slide 111
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 8/8 of 11-15-1444 by Xiaoming Peng (I2R)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 112
TGak November Closing Report Date: 2015-11-12
Authors:
from slide 1/5 of 11-15-1451 by Donald Eastlake, Huawei Technologies
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Abstract
Closing Report of IEEE 802.11 Task Group ak at the IEEE 802.11 Meeting, November 2015, held in Dallas, Texas.
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 113from slide 2/5 of 11-15-1451 by Donald Eastlake, Huawei Technologies
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 114
TGak Closing Report• Accomplishments
• We entered this meeting with 155 unresolved comments, resolved 112 of them during this meeting, ending with 43 unresolved comments.
• Received and discussed the submissions listed on the next page.
• Met jointly with 802.1 TSN and 802.11 ARC SC Thursday AM1.
• An annotated agenda is in 11-15/1220.• The minutes will be in 11-15/1452.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 3/5 of 11-15-1451 by Donald Eastlake, Huawei Technologies
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 115
TGak Closing Report• Submissions
– 111-15/0795, “Addressing Comment Resolutions”, David Kloper (Cisco)– 11-15/0796, “Resolutions to some GLK-GCR related Comments (Part 2)”,
Ganesh Venkatesan (Intel)– 11-15/0150, “GCR using SYNRA for GLK”, Ganesh Venkatesan (Intel)– 11-15/0931, “MAH Assigned Comments”, Mark Hamilton (Ruckus
Wireless)– 11-15/1388, “More Easy Editorials”, Donald Eastlake (Huawei)– 11-15/1405r1, “Generals and other Editorials”, Donald Eastlake (Huawei)– 11-15/1426, “Technicals”, Donald Eastlake (Huawei)– 11-14/0562, “11ak and 802.1AC Convergence Function”, Mark Hamilton
(Ruckus Wireless)– 11-15/1016r1, “Proposed Text Changes for Section 4.5.3”, Joseph Levy
(InterDigital)
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 4/5 of 11-15-1451 by Donald Eastlake, Huawei Technologies
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 116
TGak Closing Report
• Teleconferences• Decided to hold 1 ½ hour teleconferences, to be joint
with 802.1Qbz if mutually convenient, on Thursday, December 3rd, 10th, 17th , and January 7th, all at 10am Eastern US time.
• January 2016 Plans• Resolve remaining comments from Letter Ballot 212.• Go to recirculation ballot.• Joint meeting with 802.1 TSN and 802.11 ARC.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 5/5 of 11-15-1451 by Donald Eastlake, Huawei Technologies
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 117
TGaq Closing ReportDate: 2015-11-12
Name Company Address Phone email
Stephen McCann BlackBerry Ltd 200 Bath Road, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 3XE, UK
+44 1753 667099 [email protected]
Authors:
from slide 1/3 of 11-15-1450 by Stephen McCann, BlackBerry
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 118
Abstract
Closing report for TGaq (Pre-Association Discovery) for November 2015, Dallas,
TX, USA.
from slide 2/3 of 11-15-1450 by Stephen McCann, BlackBerry
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 119
• LB216 Comment Resolution Analysis– 92.66% approval, 400 comments, 72.63% return.– 156 editorial and 215 technical comments remaining open– Resolved 29 technical comments this week
• Discussion topics• Probe Request/Response query mechanism• Architecture• Use of ANQP
• Teleconferences– Roughly 1 every two weeks between now and January 2016 meeting– 1 joint teleconference with ARC
• Plans for January 2016– Continue to work on comment resolutions from LB216
from slide 3/3 of 11-15-1450 by Stephen McCann, BlackBerry
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 120
TGax November 2015 Closing Report
Date: 2015-11-12
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Osama Aboul-Magd Huawei Technologies 303 Terry Fox Drive,
Kanata, ONT, K2K-3J1 613-287-1405 Osama.aboulmagd@huaw
ei.com
Authors:
from slide 1/6 of 11-15-1457 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 121
Abstract
This document is the closing report for the TGax for the November 2015 session.
from slide 2/6 of 11-15-1457 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Work Completed – TG Documents• Passed a number of affecting all aspects of the TG Specification
Framework.– PHY– MAC– MU– SR
• Latest revisions of the Specification Framework is available at:– https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-0132-09-00ax-spec-framework.docx
• Other TG documents– https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0571-11-00ax-evaluation-methodolo
gy.docx
– https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0980-16-00ax-simulation-scenarios.docx
– https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0882-04-00ax-tgax-channel-model-document.docx
– https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-1009-02-00ax-proposed-802-11ax-functional-requirements.doc
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 122from slide 3/6 of 11-15-1457 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Work Completed – Technical Presentations
• The TG received over 70 technical submissions.– 27 PHY submissions– 14 MAC Submissions– 12 MU Submissions– 8 SR submissions– 8 submissions addressing TG issues
• A list of the submissions is available in the agenda document available at: – https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1232-04-00ax-tgax-n
ovember-2015-meeting-agenda.ppt
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 123from slide 4/6 of 11-15-1457 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 124
January 2016 Goals• Continue to advance the TG documents based on
submissions.– Priority to the TG Specification Framework document.
• TG timeline indicates draft D0.1 will be available in January 2016.
• Technical presentations.
from slide 5/6 of 11-15-1457 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 125
Conference Call Times
• Thursday December 10 10:00 – 12:00 ET
from slide 6/6 of 11-15-1457 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 126
Task Group AY November 2015 Closing Report
Date: 2015-11-12
Name Company Address Phone Email
Edward Au Huawei Technologies [email protected]
Authors:
from slide 1/7 of 11-15-1445 by Edward Au (Huawei Technologies)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 127
Abstract
This document is the closing report for Task Group AY for the November 2015 session.
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
from slide 2/7 of 11-15-1445 by Edward Au (Huawei Technologies)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 128
Work Completed
• 10 submissions were covered during the meeting covering areas related to:• Channel model• Functional requirements• Simulation scenario and evaluation methodology• Technologies
• A draft liaison letter to Wi-Fi Alliance is reviewed and approved:• https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1294-00-00ay-ieee-802-11-
liaison-to-wi-fi-alliance-on-its-feedback-on-802-11-task-group-ay-usage-models.doc
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 3/7 of 11-15-1445 by Edward Au (Huawei Technologies)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 129
Liaison
• A draft liaison letter to Wi-Fi Alliance is reviewed and approved:• Purposes
• To express appreciation to Wi-Fi Alliance’s effort• To inform Wi-Fi Alliance the latest progress and timeline of the
Task Group• Link
• https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1294-00-00ay-ieee-802-11-liaison-to-wi-fi-alliance-on-its-feedback-on-802-11-task-group-ay-usage-models.doc
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 4/7 of 11-15-1445 by Edward Au (Huawei Technologies)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 130
Progress on Task Group documents
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Doc. No. Title of the Task Group documents Status
15/1079r2 TGay selection procedure Approved in November 2015
15/1358r0 Specification framework for TGay Approved in November 2015 as an initial version
15/0625r3 IEEE 802.11 TGay use cases Approved in November 2015 as the baseline usage model document
15/1150r1 Channel models for IEEE 802.11ay
Draft proposals are under review and ongoing discussion15/1074r0 TGay functional requirements
15/0866r1 TGay evaluation methodology
from slide 5/7 of 11-15-1445 by Edward Au (Huawei Technologies)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 131
Teleconference Schedule
• January 5 (Tuesday), 10:00am ET to 11:00am ET
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 6/7 of 11-15-1445 by Edward Au (Huawei Technologies)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 132
Goals for January 2016 interim
• Advance on Task Group documents• Technical presentation
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 7/7 of 11-15-1445 by Edward Au (Huawei Technologies)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 133
TGaz Next Generation PositioningNov. 2015 Closing Report
Date: 2015-11-12
Name Affiliations Address Phone email
Jonathan Segev Intel Corporation [email protected]
Authors:
from slide 1/5 of 11-15-1463 by Jonathan Segev (Intel Corporation)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Slide 134
Abstract
This document is the Next Generation Positioning TGaz closing report for the Dallas meeting, Nov. 2015.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 2/5 of 11-15-1463 by Jonathan Segev (Intel Corporation)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Work Completed
• Reviewed and approved new baseline use case document.• Continued development of use case document.• Continued review of technical submissions.• Entertained vice chair elections.• Agenda: See 11-15/1237r4
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 135from slide 3/5 of 11-15-1463 by Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Goals for November meeting• Complete use case document development.• Initiate Functional Requirement Document.• Continue review of technical submissions (performance
analysis, positioning techniques, challenges etc.).• Initiate Functional Requirement Document.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 136from slide 4/5 of 11-15-1463 by Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Teleconference Schedule• Dec. 2nd 10:00 ET for 1hr.
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 137from slide 5/5 of 11-15-1463 by Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
Slide 138
IEEE 802.11 LRLP TIGLong Range Low Power
November 2015 Closing Report
Date: 2015-11-12
Name Affiliations Address Phone email Tim Godfrey EPRI 913-706-3777 [email protected]
Authors:
from slide 1/6 of 11-15-1465 by Tim Godfrey (EPRI)
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Contributions for November
11-15/1308r0: Link budget analysis – Minyoung Park (Intel Corp.)
11-15/1306r0: Use Case for Both LRLP and Full Function in STA - Tim Godfrey EPRI
11-15/1365r0: Use Cases of LRLP Operation for IoTs - Chittabrata Ghosh (Intel)
11-15/1380r0: LRLP Digital Health Use Case - Enrico-Henrik Rantala (Nokia)
11-15/1383 r0: Long range low power Use Cases for Indoor & Outdoor - Minseok OH (Kyonggi University)
Slide 139 from slide 2/6 of 11-15-1465 by Tim Godfrey (EPRI)
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Ad Hoc Editing Groups
• LRLP use cases and metrics and LRLP requirements – Ad Hoc Lead – Chittabrata Ghosh
• Technical feasibility and Technical material needed to initiate standardization– Ad Hoc Lead – Michael Fischer
Slide 140 from slide 3/6 of 11-15-1465 by Tim Godfrey (EPRI)
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Output Documents
• Output document – draft in 11-15-1446r0
• Full closing report – 11-15-1447r0
• November Minutes – 11-15-1390r0
Slide 141 from slide 4/6 of 11-15-1465 by Tim Godfrey (EPRI)
November 2015
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Between November and January
• Teleconference Plan– 2 Teleconferences, different days in December: One
teleconference for each ad-hoc team– Determine time/date in CAC and announce to reflector
• Call for Contributions for January– Coexistence and interoperation with existing 802.11 BSS– Quantification of existing use cases
Slide 142 from slide 5/6 of 11-15-1465 by Tim Godfrey (EPRI)
November 2015
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
LRLP Timeline
• TIG– November 2015 Contributions for report– January 2016 Contributions for report. Edit & revise– March 2016 Complete output report – WG Motion to Form Study Group
• SG– May 2016 Develop PAR and CSD (WG Approval)– July 2016 Approve PAR and CSD (EC)
• TG– Sept 2016
Slide 143 from slide 6/6 of 11-15-1465 by Tim Godfrey (EPRI)
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 144
RR-TAG (802.18) to 802.11 Liaison Report
Date: 2015-11-13Authors:
from slide 1/3 of 11-15-1211 by Rich Kennedy, MediaTek
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Overview
• This document summarizes the activities of the IEEE 802.18 Radio Regulatory Technical Advisory Group (RR-TAG) during the November IEEE 802 Plenary Meeting in Dallas.
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 145 from slide 2/3 of 11-15-1211 by Rich Kennedy, MediaTek
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 146
RR-TAG Actions Taken
• Developed input to the EC Regulatory SC mission statement
• Edited and updated document 18-15/0059R00 Response to ITU-R SM.2351
from slide 3/3 of 11-15-1211 by Rich Kennedy, MediaTek
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
802.24 Vertical Applications Technical Advisory Group
Liaison Report
Date: 2015-11-13
Slide 147
Name Company phone:
Tim Godfrey EPRI Email:
Author:
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
from slide 1/3 of 11-15-1549 by Tim Godfrey, EPRI
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
802.24 Overview
• 802.24.1 Smart Grid Task Group– Internal / external coordination in matters related application of IEEE 802 standards
for Smart Grid – 802.24.1 TG meets at Plenaries and Wireless Interims
• 802.24.2 IoT Task Group– Internal / external coordination in matters related application of IEEE 802 standards
for Internet of Things (IoT)– 802.24.1 TG meets at Plenaries and 802 Interims
• Nov Agenda: 24-15-0031r2• Closing Report 24-15-0040r0• Minutes 24-15-0034r0
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 148
802.24 Vertical Applications TAG
802.24.1 Smart Grid TG
802.24.2 IoT TG
from slide 2/3 of 11-15-1549 by Tim Godfrey, EPRI
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
802.24 Summary – November 2015• 24.1 Smart Grid TG:
– White paper development on Sub 1GHz wireless• Progressed development of draft : 24-15-0029r2
– ITU-R WP 1A Q236/1 report on Smart Grid.• 802.24 reviewed, edited, and provided comments. Output forwarded to 802.18 in
24-15-0028-02
– Approved formation of liaison with IEEE P2030.5 (SEP2)
• 24.2 IoT TG: – Liaison report from P2413 IoT Architecture WG
• TAG decided there is no need to co-sponsor P2413
– Internet of Things (IoT) - Overview White Paper Draft
– Approved response to form liaison with Industrial Internet Consortium (IIC)
• 802.24 TAG– 802 Student Paper Competition Flyer – final review, ready to launch
– Call for judges for paper selection will be posted to 802.24 reflector
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 149 from slide 3/3 of 11-15-1549 by Tim Godfrey, EPRI
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 150
IEEE 802.1 OmniRAN TG Status Reportto IEEE 802 WGs
• Date: 2015-11-12
Authors:
from slide 1/5 of 11-15-1458 by Max Riegel, Nokia Networks
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
IEEE 802.1 OmniRAN TG Resources
• OmniRAN TG maintains a Wiki page on mentor to reflect its status and achievements• https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/bp/StartPage• Also showing meeting announcements and conference call dial-in
information• OmniRAN filespace on mentor is used for
contributions and meeting documents• https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/documents
• FYI: OmniRAN P802.1 PAR• https://development.standards.ieee.org/get-file/P802.1CF.pdf?t=8
1644900003
Slide 151
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 2/5 of 11-15-1458 by Max Riegel, Nokia Networks
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
OmniRAN TG AchievementsDallas, TX meeting, Nov 9th – 12th
• Review and discussion of P802.1CF contributions on • Detailed Information for Network Reference Model, • Fault Diagnosis and Maintenance, • Data path establishment, relocation and teardown, and on • Network Setup for unlicensed spectrum.
• Further refinements needed before inclusion into the draft specification text.
• Informative contribution on Distributed CCAP Architectures.• Review of initial draft text for P802.1CF
• Clean-up of editorial issues and alignment of terminology and content• Special session on ‘5G requirements in scope of P 802.1CF’
• Discussion guided by contribution on network requirements of NGMN 5G whitepaper more on next slide
• Review of P802.1CF project plan• Creation of initial Draft P802.1CF document after Jan 2016 meeting• Assumed timeline within current scope:
initial TG ballot March 2016, LB Nov 2016, SB Jul 2017Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide
152 from slide 3/5 of 11-15-1458 by Max Riegel, Nokia Networks
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
OmniRAN TG Discussions‘5G requirements in scope of P802.1CF’
• Special 2hrs session on Nov. 10th • Well attended by industry
• Guiding presentation: “5G scope and requirements”• https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/15/omniran-15-0054-00-CF0
0-5g-scope-and-requirements.pptx• Presentation and discussion showed that P802.1CF
might be well suited as the basis to address the network requirements stated in NGMN 5G whitepaper• However not addressing wide-area high mobility
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 153 from slide 4/5 of 11-15-1458 by Max Riegel, Nokia Networks
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
Looking forward to next session in Atlanta, January 18-21, 2016
• Envisioned topics:• Further contributions on open sections• Adoption of text contributions to the draft text
• Conference call:• December 10th, 10:00 AM ET
• Dial-in details on OmniRAN TG Wiki page on mentorhttps://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/bp/StartPage
• Review contributions invited in Nov meeting to conclude on next draft text revision
Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 154 from slide 5/5 of 11-15-1458 by Max Riegel, Nokia Networks
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 155
IEEE 802.11-IETF Liaison ReportDate: 2015-11-10
Name Company Address Phone email Dorothy Stanley HPE - Aruba 1322 Crossman Ave
Sunnyvale, CA 630-363-1389 dstanley@arubanetworks.
com
Authors:
from slide 1/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 156
Abstract
This presentation contains the IEEE 802.11 – IETF liaison report for November 2015.
from slide 2/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 157
IETF Meetings• Meetings:
– November 1-6, 2015 – Yokahama– April 3-8, 2016 – Buenos Aires– July 17-22, 2016 – Berlin– November 13-18 – Seoul Korea
• http://www.ietf.org– Newcomer training:
https://www.ietf.org/edu/process-oriented-tutorials.html#newcomers
– Tutorials (process and technical); Wireless Tutorial (Donald Eastlake) : https://www.ietf.org/edu/tutorials.html
from slide 3/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 158
IETF- IEEE 802 Liaison Activity
• Joint meetings, agenda and presentations– http://www.iab.org/activities/joint-activities/iab-ieee-coordination/– 2015-09-29 teleconference held; New 802.11 work item re: multicast, request
for more info on 802.11 multicast operation. – Next teleconference is Monday February 1st, 2016 10am-noon Eastern
• RFC 7241, “The IEEE 802/IETF Relationship” has been published (RFC4441 update)– https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7241/
• IEEE 802 Liaisons list is available – http://ieee-sa.centraldesktop.com/802liaisondb/FrontPage
• 802 EC “IETF/IAB/IESG” 802 EC Standing Committee – Formed March 2014, Pat Thaler as chair
from slide 4/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 159
Multicast issues• Multicast issues were discussed at the IETF-IEEE 802 meeting Sept
29th and a presentation given at the November IETF meeting– See https://
mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1261-02-0arc-mulicast-performance-optimization-features-overview-for-ietf-nov-2015.ppt
– Further actions: ietf mailing list will be established for ongoing discussion, will include additional 802. wireless groups; potential internet draft describing use cases, issues, etc.
• Insights– Multicast used for multiple types of traffic including ARP/ND, routing protocols,
video applications, and these might need to be transmitted at different MCS– Implementations might consider APIs to allow MCS differentiation– RFC 6775, Neighbor Discovery Optimization for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless
Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs) defines a registration mechanism for accomplishing proxy ND
– Current Proxy ND support does not address Secure ND, see RFC 3971• Available internet drafts and related documents
– http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcbride-mboned-wifi-mcast-problem-statement/ – http://www.ipv6council.be/IMG/pdf/20141212-08_vyncke_-_
ipv6_multicast_issues-pptx.pdf
from slide 5/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 160
Recent IETF BOFs• November: Internet Storage Synch, see https://
tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cui-iss-problem-03 • July: CAPtive PORTal interaction:
– The Captive Portal (CAPPORT) Working Group will define a standard mechanism for clients to interact with Captive Portals, including how to discover and connect, and how to communicate with it to obtain status information such as remaining access time, purchased bandwith class, etc. This working group will seek participation and input from browser / operating system vendors, captive portal developers and operators. One of the known challenges is that some captive portal operators may not want to use a standard interaction protocol, preferring to perform more intrusive interception and interactions. We are hoping that the benefits to CP standardization outlined here are sufficient to not only encourage input from CP developers and operators, but also aid in deployment. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-capport-icmp-unreach/
– See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-16 – Related presentation in WNG: https://
mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1128-01-0wng-owe.ppt – CAPPORT not formed
from slide 6/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 161
Of Interest to Smart Grid• 6LO
– Working Group website: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/6lo/charter/ – Focus: IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes– See WNG presentation: https://
mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/15/11-15-1085-00-0wng-6lowpan-over-802-11.pptx and
– http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-delcarpio-6lo-wlanah/ – https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-6lo-routing-dispatch-06 – https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-6lo-backbone-router-02 – Unique IPv6 Prefix Per Host, https://
tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-00 • The concepts in this document were originally developed as part of a large scale,
production deployment of IPv6 support for a community Wi-Fi service.
• ROLL: Working Group website: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/ – Focus: Routing over Low Power and Lossy Networks
• CORE : (Constrained RESTful Environments) Working Group website: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/core/ – Focus: framework for resource-oriented applications intended to run on constrained IP
networks. from slide 7/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 162
RADEXT WG• See http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/radext/ • RADIUS Extensions
– The RADIUS Extensions Working Group will focus on extensions to theRADIUS protocol required to define extensions to the standard attribute space as well as to address cryptographic algorithm agility and use over new transports.
– In addition, RADEXT will work on RADIUS Design Guidelines and define new attributes for particular applications of authentication, authorization andaccounting such as NAS management and local area network (LAN) usage.
• Updates [November 2015]– Updated: Data Types in the Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service Protocol
(RADIUS, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-datatypes/ – RFC 7585 published: NAI-based Dynamic Peer Discovery for RADIUS/TLS and
RADIUS/DTLS, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7585/ – Updated: RADIUS extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting, see
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext/
– Also note individual submission: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-harkins-salted-eap-pwd-02 EMU and Security Area review incorporated, IETF Last Call pending.. Related draft (will be RFC 7664), see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-dragonfly/ .
from slide 8/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 163
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ECRIT)
• Working Group website: http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/ecrit-charter.html
• Emergency Services – Framework for Emergency Calling using Internet Multimedia, see
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6443/
• Updates [November 2015]– New version, Submitted to IESG for publication: Additional Data Related to an Emergency
Call, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data/ – New version: Next-Generation Vehicle-Initiated Emergency Calls, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash/ – New version: Next-Generation Pan-European eCall, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall/
from slide 9/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 164
Home Networking (homenet) WG• See https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/homenet/ • This working group focuses on the evolving networking technology
within and among relatively small "residential home" networks – The task of the group is to produce an architecture document that outlines how to construct
home networks involving multiple routers and subnets. – This document is expected to apply the IPv6 addressing architecture, prefix delegation, global
and ULA addresses, source address selection rules and other existing components of the IPv6 architecture, as appropriate.
– Home Networking Architecture for IPv6, Published as IPv6 Home Networking Architecture Principle: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7368/
• Updates [November 2015] Documents of interest:– New: Home Network Wi-Fi Roaming, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-homenet-wifi-roaming/ – Submitted for publication and updated: Distributed Node Consensus Protocol, see
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-dncp/ – In RFC Editor queue: Prefix and Address Assignment in a Home Network:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment/ – Updated: Outsourcing Home Network Authoritative Naming Service ,
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation/ – Updated: Auto-Configuration of a Network of Hybrid Unicast/Multicast DNS-Based Service
Discovery Proxy Nodes, http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-hybrid-proxy-zeroconf/
from slide 10/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 165
Operations Area Working Group• http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsawg/
– Area WG processes submissions related to Operations Area WGs that have closed– Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) Working Group
closed in 2009• Responded to requests from OPSAWG chairs for IEEE 802.11 review
– “Alternate Tunnel Encapsulation for Data Frames in CAPWAP” http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-zhang-opsawg-capwap-cds-02.txt , see Slide 5 in https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0368-01-0000-march-2014-liaison-to-ietf-report.pptx
– “IEEE 802.11 MAC Profile for CAPWAP” https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac/ , see https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0684-01-0000-capwap-hybridmac-liaison-response.docx
– “CAPWAP extension for 802.11n and Power/channel Autoconfiguration” http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-extension/ , see https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0913-01-0000-liaison-response-opsawg-capwap-extension.docx
• Updates [November 2015] Operations Area Working Group work group items– CAPWAP Hybrid MAC published as RFC7494, http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7494/ – No Change: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-extension/ – Updated: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel/ – Of interest: RFC6632, An Overview of the IETF Network Management Protocols, see https://
tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6632 – Of Interest: RFC7548, Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Use Cases, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7548/
from slide 11/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 166
Active Queue Management (AQM)
• Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling Working Group website: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/aqm/charter/
• IETF Recommendations Regarding Active Queue Management to update https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2309/
• Updates [November 2015]– RFC 7567 published: IETF Recommendations Regarding Active Queue Management, see https://
tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7567– Updated: The Benefits and Pitfalls of using Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN), see
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits/ – Updated: AQM Characterization Guidelines, see
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines/
from slide 12/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 167
Transport Layer Security (TLS)• Transport Layer Security Working Group website:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tls/charter/
• Work underway on a new version of TLS (used in EAP methods): Transport Layer Security Protocol Version 1.3
• Updates [November 2015]– RFC 7685 published: A TLS ClientHello padding extension,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7685/ – RFC 7568 published: Deprecating Secure Sockets Layer Version 3.0, see
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7568/ – Submitted to IESG for publication: Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral
Parameters for TLS, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe/ – Updated: TLS version 1.3 http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-tls13/ – Updated: Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport Layer
Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis/
– Curve25519 and Curve448 for Transport Layer Security (TLS), see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-curve25519/
from slide 13/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 168
Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery (dnssd)
• Working Group website: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnssd/charter/ • Charter: Develop scalable DNS-SD/mDNS Extension requirements and
standard solutions to address problematic use of mDNS and DNS-SD in networks today– mDNS discovery of services on other links is not possible– Multicast transmissions over wireless are very expensive– Addressed with different ad hoc technologies
• Of interest to: Homenet, Zero configuration, Enterprise-grade vendors of 802.11 infrastructure, Multi-link mesh networking
• Updates [November 2015]– RFC 7558 published, Requirements for Scalable DNS-Based Service Discovery (DNS-
SD) / Multicast DNS (mDNS) Extensions: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7558/ – Updated: Hybrid Multicast/Unicast DNS-Based Service Discovery, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid/ – Updated: Scalable DNS-SD (SSD) Threats, see
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-otis-dnssd-scalable-dns-sd-threats/ – Updated: On Interoperation of Labels Between mDNS and DNS,
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop/
from slide 14/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 169
Of Interest: Network-Based Mobility Extensions (NETEXT)
• NETEXT: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/netext/charter/
• RFC 7561 published: Mapping PMIPv6 QoS Procedures with WLAN QoS Procedures, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7561/
• Abstract: This document provides guidelines for achieving end to end Quality- of-Service (QoS) in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) domain where the access network is based on IEEE 802.11. RFC 7222 describes QoS negotiation between a Mobility Access Gateway (MAG) and Local Mobility Anchor (LMA) in a PMIPv6 mobility domain. The negotiated QoS parameters can be used for QoS policing and marking of packets to enforce QoS differentiation on the path between the MAG and LMA. IEEE 802.11, Wi-Fi Multimedia - Admission Control (WMM-AC) describes methods for QoS negotiation between a Wi-Fi Station (MN in PMIPv6 terminology) and an Access Point. This document provides a mapping between the above two sets of QoS procedures and the associated QoS parameters. This document is intended to be used as a companion document to RFC 7222 to enable implementation of end to end QoS.
from slide 15/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 170
Protocols for IP Multicast (PIM)
• PIM: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/pim/charter/ – The Working Group charter includes: “Optimization approaches for IGMP and MLD
to adapt to link conditions in wireless and mobile networks and be more robust to packet loss.”
– And a work item (April 2016) “submit solutions for IGMP and MLD to adapt to wireless link conditions”
• Of interest:– Updated: IGMP/MLD-Based Explicit Membership Tracking Function for Multicast
Routers, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-explicit-tracking/ – Updated: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol
Specification (Revised), https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis/– RFC 2236: Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 2 (IPv4), https://
tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2236 – RFC 2710: Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) for IPv6, https://
www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2710.txt
from slide 16/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 171
References
• RFC 4017 - IEEE 802.11 Requirements on EAP Methods
• Jan 2012 report (PAWS, Homenet details), https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/12/11-12-0122-01-0000-january-2012-liaison-to-ietf.ppt
from slide 17/17 of 11-15-1228 by Dorothy Stanley, HPE-Aruba
November 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 172
Wi-Fi Alliance Liaison UpdateDate: 2015-11-11
Name Company Address Phone email
Ian Sherlock Texas Instruments 12500 TI Blvd, Dallas, Tx 75243
Authors:
from slide 1/4 of 11-15-1428 by Ian Sherlock, Texas Instruments
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
• The last WFA member meeting was held in the week of 19th Oct 2015 in Budapest, Hungary
• Recent Items of note– Wi-Fi Alliance introduced Implementer membership grade to support IoT
• http://www.wi-fi.org/news-events/newsroom/wi-fi-alliance-introduces-implementer-membership-to-support-emerging-market
– Wi-Fi Alliance held a workshop on 4th Nov 2015 to advance LTE-U and Wi-Fi coexistence discussion • http://
www.wi-fi.org/news-events/newsroom/wi-fi-alliance-aims-to-harmonize-wi-fi-and-lte-u-coexistence
• Ongoing technical activity at WFA leading to certification, based on IEEE programs– Location – 60GHz, – VHT5 wave2– White Spaces– Extended range, based on 802.11ah– Timing Measurement
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 173from slide 2/4 of 11-15-1428 by Ian Sherlock, Texas Instruments
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
• Examples of other technical work ongoing in WFA– Neighbor Awareness Networking – low power discovery– Wireless Serial Bus– Display– Security – Device Provisioning Protocol– Application Services– LTE Coexistence– Multiband Operations– Passpoint– IoT for connected Home
• Examples of WFA Activity in other areas, potentially leading to technical work – Automotive
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 174from slide 3/4 of 11-15-1428 by Ian Sherlock, Texas Instruments
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1227r0
Report
• If those sound like interesting areas please plan to attend the next member meeting which is scheduled for the week of 7th Mar 2016 in Kyoto, Japan.
• Further information at http://www.wi-fi.org/
November 2015
Adrian Stephe
ns, Intel
Corporation
Slide 175from slide 4/4 of 11-15-1428 by Ian Sherlock, Texas Instruments
