19
Novembe r 2003 Ravi Mahad evapp Slide 1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n Ravi Mahadevappa, [email protected] Stephan ten Brink, [email protected] Realtek Semiconductors, Irvine, CA

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 1

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

Ravi Mahadevappa, [email protected] ten Brink, [email protected]

Realtek Semiconductors, Irvine, CA

Page 2: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 2

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

Overview• 128QAM for increasing data rate of 802.11n

– MIMO 2xN: can achieve 2x54Mbps = 108Mbps in 20MHz– 108Mbps peak too small to get 100Mbps MAC throughput– MIMO 2xN, 128QAM, R=7/8 code, 20MHz: 147Mbps

achievable

• Consider four 128QAM constellations/labelings– Determine the one which is most suitable

• Performance comparison using mutual information in bit-interleaved coded modulation (BICM) [1], [2]

• BER chart in AWGN and Rayleigh channel• PER chart in an 802.11a-like setting (2x2, 2x3 MIMO)

Page 3: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 3

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

Introduction• Bit Interleaved Coded Modulation (BICM)

– Gray-labeling of the constellation points is best to achieve a low bit error rate (BER), if no iterative decoding is applied [2]

• For QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM, 256QAM– True Gray-labeling possible, using a square constellation– Gray-labeling per I-/Q-channel– I-/Q-channel independent, can be demapped separately

• For 128QAM– no true Gray-labeling possible– e.g. 128QAM: 7 bits; one bit has to be “distributed” over I/Q

Page 4: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 4

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

802.11a Transmitter

channelencoder

andpuncturer

QAMmapper iFFT

add cyclicextension(guard)

addtrainingsymbols

interpol.and filter,

limiter

bit interleaver

add pilotsymbols

D/A up-converter

amplifier

binary source

• Bit interleaved coded modulation– Channel encoder (error correcting coding) and QAM

symbol mapper are connected through a bit interleaver– The 802.11a WLAN system [3] exhibits this structure

Page 5: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 5

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

802.11a Receiver

decimateandfilter

synchr.frequencycorrection FFT QAM

demapper

bit deinterleaver

de-punct.and

channeldecoder

down-converter

amplifier A/D

frequ.offset

estimator

channelestimator

andtracker

binary sink

pilotremoval

-1

Page 6: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 6

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

64QAM Example: Gray-labeling• 64QAM with Gray-

labeling: bit labels of neighboring signal points differ by one binary digit

• Most systems with QAM modulation use Gray-labeling, e.g. 802.11a WLAN [3]

• Allows low-complexity bit detection (I/Q can be dealt with separately)

-7 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7

-7

-5

-3

-1

1

3

5

7

000000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

011

011

011

011

011

011

011

011

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

110

110

110

110

110

110

110

110

111

111

111

111

111

111

111

111

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001

011 011 011 011 011 011 011 011

010 010 010 010 010 010 010 010

110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110

111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111

101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Page 7: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 7

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

128QAM Constellations: Shifted I• Based on two shifted

64QAM constellations

• Proposed for different systems, e.g. [4]

• Motivation: I&Q can be demapped separately

• Bit labels of neighboring signal points differ by two binary digits

• See later: Good for iterative BICM (demapper/decoder iterations), but not good for BICM

-15 -13 -11 -9 -7 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15

-15

-13

-11

-9

-7

-5

-3

-1

1

3

5

7

9

11

13

15

1000000 1000011 1000110 1000101 1000100 1000111 1000010 1000001

1011000 1011011 1011110 1011101 1011100 1011111 1011010 1011001

1110000 1110011 1110110 1110101 1110100 1110111 1110010 1110001

1101000 1101011 1101110 1101101 1101100 1101111 1101010 1101001

0100000 0100011 0100110 0100101 0100100 0100111 0100010 0100001

0111000 0111011 0111110 0111101 0111100 0111111 0111010 0111001

0010000 0010011 0010110 0010101 0010100 0010111 0010010 0010001

0001000 0001011 0001110 0001101 0001100 0001111 0001010 0001001

10010101001001 1001111 1001100 1001101 1001110 1001011 1001000

10100101010001 1010111 1010100 1010101 1010110 1010011 1010000

11110101111001 1111111 1111100 1111101 1111110 1111011 1111000

11000101100001 1100111 1100100 1100101 1100110 1100011 1100000

01010100101001 0101111 0101100 0101101 0101110 0101011 0101000

01100100110001 0110111 0110100 0110101 0110110 0110011 0110000

00110100011001 0011111 0011100 0011101 0011110 0011011 0011000

00000100000001 0000111 0000100 0000101 0000110 0000011 0000000

Page 8: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 8

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

128QAM: Shifted II, 64QAM/Gray• Based on two 64QAM

constellations, shifted

• Gray-labeling per 64QAM constellation

• Bit labels of neighboring signal points differ by more than one binary digit at several places

-15 -13 -11 -9 -7 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15

-15

-13

-11

-9

-7

-5

-3

-1

1

3

5

7

9

11

13

15

000000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

011

011

011

011

011

011

011

011

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

110

110

110

110

110

110

110

110

111

111

111

111

111

111

111

111

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001

011 011 011 011 011 011 011 011

010 010 010 010 010 010 010 010

110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110

111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111

101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

000000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

011

011

011

011

011

011

011

011

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

110

110

110

110

110

110

110

110

111

111

111

111

111

111

111

111

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001

011 011 011 011 011 011 011 011

010 010 010 010 010 010 010 010

110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110

111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111

101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Page 9: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 9

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

128QAM: Cross I, DVB-C• DVB-C(able) [5] uses

cross constellation and this bit labeling

• The two MSB’s are differentially encoded, to be rotationally invariant against 90degree flips

• “Almost” Gray-labeling within one quadrant, but bit labels differ by many bits along the zero I- and Q-axis

• Not designed for BICM

0000000

0000010

0000001

0000011

0000101

0000111

0000100

0000110

0010010

0010000

0010011

0010001

0010111

0010101

0010110

0010100

0011110

0011100

0011111

0011101

0001100

0001110

0001101

0001111

0011000

0011010

0011001

0011011

0001001

0001011

0001000

0001010

3 digits

00000

00010

00001

00011

00101

00111

00100

00110

10010

10000

10011

10001

10111

10101

10110

10100

11110

11100

11111

11101

01100

01110

01101

01111

11000

11010

11001

11011

01001

01011

01000

01010

00000 00010

00001 00011

00101 00111

00100 00110

10010 10000

10011 10001

10111 10101

10110 10100

11110 11100

11111 11101

01100 01110

01101 01111

11000 11010

11001 11011

01001 01011

01000 01010

IQ 00IQ 10

IQ 11 IQ 01

0000000010

0000100011

0010100111

0010000110

1001010000

1001110001

1011110101

1011010100

1111011100

1111111101

0110001110

0110101111

1100011010

1100111011

0100101011

0100001010

3

5

3

3

5

3 d

igits

3 d igits

3 d

igits

3 5 3 3 55 3 3 5 3

5

3

3

5

3

digits

digits

+ 11-7-11 -9 -5 -3 -1 + 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9

-11

-9

-7

-5

-3

-1

+ 1

+ 3

+ 5

+ 7

+ 9

+ 11

Page 10: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 10

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

128QAM: Cross II, Gray-like• Center: 64QAM with

Gray-labeling as 802.11a; the 7th bit (most significant bit, MSB) is set to zero

• Borders: mirrored 64QAM; horizontally, vertically flipped from center, MSB set to one

• Labels of neighboring signal points differ by 3 digits at few places

• All other bit labels of neighboring signal points differ by only one binary digit

000000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

011

011

011

011

011

011

011

011

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

110

110

110

110

110

110

110

110

111

111

111

111

111

111

111

111

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001

011 011 011 011 011 011 011 011

010 010 010 010 010 010 010 010

110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110

111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111

101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

-7 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7-9-11 9 11

-7

-5

-3

-1

1

3

5

7

9

11

-9

-11

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000001

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

011

010

110

111

101

1001

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 000000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

001

011

010

110

111

101

1001

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 000100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

001

011

010

110

111

101

1001

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 000101

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

001

011

010

110

111

101

1001

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

011 010 110 111100 100 100 1001 1 1 1

011 010 110 111101 101 101 1011 1 1 1

000 000 000 000011 010 110 1111 1 1 1

011 010 110 111001 001 001 0011 1 1 1

011

011

010

010

110110

111111 11

11 110

110

111

111

110110

111111 11

11

011

011

010

010

011011

010010 11

11 110

110

111

111

011011

010010 11

11

3 digits 3 digits

3 digits3 digits

Page 11: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 11

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

128QAM: Cross II, Gray-like• Generation by

mirroring, flipping center 64QAM Gray constellation to outside and setting MSB from 0 to 1

000000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

011

011

011

011

011

011

011

011

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

110

110

110

110

110

110

110

110

111

111

111

111

111

111

111

111

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001

011 011 011 011 011 011 011 011

010 010 010 010 010 010 010 010

110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110

111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111

101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

-7 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7-9-11 9 11

-7

-5

-3

-1

1

3

5

7

9

11

-9

-11

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000001

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

001

011

010

110

111

101

1001

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 000000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

001

011

010

110

111

101

1001

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 000100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

001

011

010

110

111

101

1001

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 000101

101

101

101

101

101

101

101

001

011

010

110

111

101

1001

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

011 010 110 111100 100 100 1001 1 1 1

011 010 110 111101 101 101 1011 1 1 1

000 000 000 000011 010 110 1111 1 1 1

011 010 110 111001 001 001 0011 1 1 1

011

011

010

010

110110

111111 11

11 110

110

111

111

110110

111111 11

11

011

011

010

010

011011

010010 11

11 110

110

111

111

011011

010010 11

11

Page 12: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 12

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

128QAM: Comparison, EXIT Chart• Extrinsic information

transfer (EXIT) chart [6] to predict performance

• AWGN, Eb/N0=9dB, at code rate 3/4

• For BICM, start of curve essential (this is the mutual information, that demapper “sees”)

• Cross II: highest start– best for BICM

• Cross I has “moderate” slope; Shifted II similar

– Mediocre for BICM

• Shifted I: lowest start– bad for BICM– but would be best for

iterative demapping and decoding

Only start of curve relevant for good BICM performance(the higher, the better)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

extr

insi

c m

utua

l inf

orm

atio

n at

128Q

AM

AP

Pde

map

per

outp

ut

a prio ri m utual info rm atio n at 128Q A M A P P dem apper input

cross II (Gray-like)

128Q A M , cro ss I (D V B -C labeling), 9dB

128Q A M , shif ted I, 9dB

co de rate 3/4

128Q A M , shif ted II (two shif ted 64Q A M G ray), 9dB

shifted I

Page 13: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 13

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

128QAM: BER Chart, AWGN• AWGN, rate 3/4

memory 6 convolutional code

• 64QAM (Gray) as reference

• Best: Cross II

• Worst: Shifted I

• Difference about 2dB

0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

BE

R

Es/N0 [dB]

64QAM, rate 3/4 memory 6 code, reference128QAM, Cross II128QAM, Cross I

128QAM, Shifted II128QAM, Shifted I

64QA

M, referen

ce128Q

AM

, Cro

ss II (Gray-like)

128QA

M, S

hifted

I

Page 14: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

128QAM: BER Chart, Rayleigh• Rayleigh channel

(ergodic), rate 3/4 memory 6 convolutional code

• 64QAM as reference

• Best: Cross II

• Worst: Shifted I

• Difference about 2dB

0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36

BE

R

Es/N0 [dB]

64QAM, rate 3/4 memory 6 code, reference128QAM, Cross II128QAM, Cross I

128QAM, Shifted II128QAM, Shifted I

Page 15: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 15

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

PER, 802.11a-like High-Rate System• MIMO-OFDM simulation,

with 11a parameters for symbol duration, guard time, 64FFT etc.

• M=2 TX antennas (spatial multiplexing), 128QAM rate 3/4 mem. 6 conv. code; PHY rate of 126Mbps

• MIMO sub-channels: independent fading, with exp. decay profile, Trms = 60ns

• MIMO ZF detection with soft post processing

• Ca. 1dB-advantage of Cross II over Shifted II

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38

PE

R

Es/N0 [dB]

MIMO 2x3

MIMO 2x2

Shifted II

(2x64Gray)

Cross II

(Gray-like)

2x2, Cross II (Gray-like labeling)

2x2, Shifted II (2x64Gray)2x3, Cross II

2x3, Shifted II

128QAM constellations

1dB1.3dB

Page 16: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 16

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

Conclusion

• To increase spectral efficiency, the use of 128QAM is a possible option

• 128QAM helps to smoothen the rate table• Constellation mapping and labeling important• Recommendation:

If 128QAM is to be considered for 11n, cross-constellation with Gray-like labeling (Cross II) should be used

Page 17: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 17

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

References[1] E. Zehavi, “8-PSK trellis codes for a Rayleigh channel”, IEEE Trans. Commun.,

vol. 40, pp. 873-884, May 1992

[2] G. Caire, G. Taricco, E. Biglieri, “Bit-interleaved coded modulation”, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 927-946, May 1998

[3] IEEE Std 802.11a-1999, Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, High-speed Physical Layer in the 5 GHz Band

[4] IEEE P802.15-15-03-0311-00-003a, “Reasons to use non-squared QAM constellations with independent I&Q in PAN systems”, July 2003

[5] “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB): Framing structure, channel coding and modulation for cable systems”, EN 300 429, V. 1.2.1 (1998-04), European Standard (Telecommunications series)

[6] S. ten Brink, “Convergence of iterative decoding,”, Electron. Lett., vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 806-808, May 1999

Page 18: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 18

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

Backup Slides

Page 19: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0 Submission November 2003 Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek Slide 1 Comparison of 128QAM mappings/labelings for 802.11n

November 2003

Ravi Mahadevappa, Stephan ten Brink, Realtek

Slide 19

doc.: IEEE 802.11-03/825r0

Submission

128QAM: Comparison, EXIT Chart• For Cross I, one needs

to increase Eb/N0 by 1dB to achieve the same starting point as Cross II

• For Shifted I, one needs to increase Eb/N0 by 2.2dB to achieve the same starting point as the Cross II constellation

• Shifted II: Increase by 1.4dB required

• Next step: Verify Eb/N0-offset predictions by BER simulations using memory 6 convolutional code of rate 3/40

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

extr

insi

c m

utua

l inf

orm

atio

n at

AP

P d

emap

per

outp

ut

a prio ri m utual info rm atio n at A P P dem apper input

128Q A M , cro ss II (G ray-like labeling), 9dB128Q A M , cro ss I (D V B -C labeling), 9dB

128Q A M , shif ted I, 9dB

co de rate 3/4

128Q A M , shif ted II (two shif ted 64Q A M G ray), 9dB

128Q A M , cro ss I (D V B -C labeling), 10dB128Q A M , shif ted I, E b/N 0=11.2dB

128Q A M , shif ted II (two shif ted 64Q A M G ray), 10.4dB