1
Letter to the Editors-in-Chief Do sick preterm babies need adult levels of AntiXa units for thrombolysis? Dear Editors, We read a recent review on the use of Enoxaprin in neonatal thrombosis by Malowany et al. [1] with great interest and would like to report our observation with a question regarding future research. We recently treated a 490 g, 24 week baby for an occlusive distal aortic thrombus measuring 0.6 × 0.1 cm with 2 mg/kg Q12 hr Enoxaparin. We were unable to achieve the therapeutic level of Anti-Xa units despite increasing the dose to 2.5 mg/kg Q12 on day 3 of therapy. The therapeutic level (0.68 U/ml) was achieved after 6 days of therapy. Since the thrombus was a limb threatening occlusion we were following it with frequent Doppler ultrasounds. What was interesting was the fact that the thrombus had signicant resolution at day 6 and was completely resolved by day 12 despite the sub-therapeutic levels. There have been many case reports of spontaneous resolution of thrombus in this population and close observation has been suggested as one of the therapeutic options in non emergent situations. It is easy to imagine that the haemostatic and thrombolytic ability of the sick babies would be different depending on the severity of illness and their gestational age. The observation raises the following questions-Is the extrapolation of the adult data for achieving the idealtherapeutic levels in this vulnerable population a good idea or should we look at other markers of the inherent thrombolytic ability of these sick preterm babies and adjust the therapy accordingly. Reference [1] Malowany JI, Monagle P, Knoppert DC, Lee DS, Wu J, McCusker P, et al. Enoxaparin for neonatal thrombosis: a call for a higher dose for neonates. Thromb Res 2008;122(6): 82630. Vishal PandeyKrishna Dummula Prabhu Parimi Kansas University Medical Center Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 91 216 315 5882; fax: +1 91 913 588 6317. E-mail address: [email protected] (V. Pandey). Thrombosis Research 127 (2011) 492 (A) Ultrasonographic image of an occlusive thrombus measuring 6 × 1 mm, visualized in the distal aorta in a 10 day old-24 week premature infant secondary to umbilical arterial catheterization. (B) Repeat sonogram showing a signicant resolution in thrombus size after 6 days of enoxaparin therapy. 0049-3848/$ see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2010.12.007 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Thrombosis Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/thromres

Do sick preterm babies need adult levels of AntiXa units for thrombolysis?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Do sick preterm babies need adult levels of AntiXa units for thrombolysis?

Thrombosis Research 127 (2011) 492

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Thrombosis Research

j ourna l homepage: www.e lsev ie r.com/ locate / th romres

Letter to the Editors-in-Chief

Do sick preterm babies need adult levels of AntiXa unitsfor thrombolysis?

Dear Editors,

We read a recent review on the use of Enoxaprin in neonatalthrombosis byMalowany et al. [1] with great interest and would like toreport our observation with a question regarding future research.

We recently treateda490 g, 24 weekbaby for anocclusivedistal aorticthrombus measuring 0.6×0.1 cm with 2 mg/kg Q12 hr Enoxaparin. Wewere unable to achieve the therapeutic level of Anti-Xa units despiteincreasing the dose to 2.5 mg/kgQ12 on day 3 of therapy. The therapeuticlevel (0.68 U/ml)wasachievedafter6 daysof therapy. Since the thrombuswas a limb threatening occlusion we were following it with frequentDoppler ultrasounds.Whatwas interestingwas the fact that the thrombushad significant resolution at day 6 andwas completely resolved by day 12despite the “sub-therapeutic levels”.

There have been many case reports of spontaneous resolution ofthrombus in this population and close observation has been suggestedas one of the therapeutic options in non emergent situations. It is easyto imagine that the haemostatic and thrombolytic ability of the sickbabies would be different depending on the severity of illness andtheir gestational age.

The observation raises the following questions-Is the extrapolationof the adult data for achieving the “ideal” therapeutic levels in thisvulnerable population a good idea or should we look at other markersof the inherent thrombolytic ability of these sick preterm babies andadjust the therapy accordingly.

(A) Ultrasonographic image of an occlusive thrombus measuring 6×1 mm, visualized iarterial catheterization. (B) Repeat sonogram showing a significant resolution in throm

0049-3848/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2010.12.007

Reference

[1] Malowany JI, Monagle P, Knoppert DC, Lee DS, Wu J, McCusker P, et al. Enoxaparin forneonatal thrombosis: a call for a higher dose for neonates. Thromb Res 2008;122(6):826–30.

Vishal Pandey⁎Krishna Dummula

Prabhu ParimiKansas University Medical Center

⁎Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 91 216 315 5882;fax: +1 91 913 588 6317.

E-mail address: [email protected] (V. Pandey).

n the distal aorta in a 10 day old-24 week premature infant secondary to umbilicalbus size after 6 days of enoxaparin therapy.