PRE-RETROFIT POST-RETROFIT Extremely dissatisfied 13% Extremely satisfied 22% Somewhat dissatisfied 9% Nether satisfied nor dissatisfied 17% Somewhat satisfied 39% Nether satisfied nor dissatisfied 4% Somewhat satisfied 27% Somewhat dissatisfied 4% Extremely dissatisfied 4% Extremely satisfied 61% Overall score improved from 2.5 to 1.6 (1 = Extremely satisfied, 5 = Extremely dissatisfied) Slipstream evaluated ENERGY SAVINGS, COST, AND OCCUPANT AND OPERATOR SATISFACTION of the Cree SmartCast lighting system. This system integrates occupancy and photosensor controls into each fixture, and also includes task tuning. Through analyzing the daily profiles across each space, we calculated that 48% of the energy savings was attributable to the switch to LEDs. THE REMAINING WAS FROM THE CONTROLS; 9% from tuning light levels, 3% from occupancy and 9% from daylighting. Note that savings would be different in spaces with more variable occupancy or different daylight availability. The results of our occupant satisfaction survey have been overwhelmingly positive, even with the overall light levels generally being reduced. Here are the pre- and post-retrofit results when we asked how satisfied occupants were with their light levels. Schuetter, S., “LED fixtures and integrated controls for advanced holistic lighting solutions”, ESTCP Project EW-201722. Do luminaire level lighting controls live up to their promise? We tested the system BY REPLACING THE FLUORESCENT SYSTEMS IN THREE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OFFICE BUILDINGS at two Air National Guard Bases. RESULTS ENERGY SAVINGS: 69% OF LIGHTING ENERGY, 2.5 kWh/ft 2 COST SAVINGS: UTILITY BILL SAVINGS: $0.42/ft2 OCCUPANT SATISFACTION Tuning LEDs Occupancy Daylight 9% 48% 3% 9% However, cost effectiveness for demonstration project remains challenging. 20-year simple payback. Other demonstration projects show more favorable economics (approaching 8 years). Trend is continued reduction in cost, which will continue to improve economics. This project was supported by a grant from the Department of Defense’s Environmental Security Technology Certification Program. Lighting retrofits traditionally focus on LEDs without controls. PROBLEM

Do luminaire level lighting controls live up to their promise? · Do luminaire level lighting controls live up to their promise? We tested the system BY REPLACING THE FLUORESCENT

Download PDF Report

Upload
others
View
4
Download
0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Do luminaire level lighting controls live up to their promise? · Do luminaire level lighting controls live up to their promise? We tested the system BY REPLACING THE FLUORESCENT

PRE-RETROFIT POST-RETROFITExtremely

dissatisfied13%

Extremelysatisfied22%

Somewhatdissatisfied

Nether satisfied nor dissatisfied

17%

Somewhatsatisfied39%

Nether satisfiednor dissatisfied 4%

Somewhatsatisfied 27%

Somewhatdissatisfied 4%

Extremelydissatisfied 4%

Extremelysatisfied61%

Overall score improved from 2.5 to 1.6 (1 = Extremely satisfied, 5 = Extremely dissatisfied)

Slipstream evaluated ENERGY SAVINGS, COST, AND OCCUPANT AND OPERATOR SATISFACTION of the Cree SmartCast lighting system. This system integrates occupancy and photosensor controls into each fixture, and also includes task tuning.

Through analyzing the daily profiles across each space, we calculated that 48% of the energy savings was attributable to the switch to LEDs. THE REMAININGWAS FROM THE CONTROLS; 9% from tuning light levels, 3% from occupancy and 9% from daylighting.

Note that savings would be di�erent in spaces with more variable occupancy or di�erent daylight availability.

The results of our occupant satisfaction survey have been overwhelmingly positive, even with the overall light levels generally being reduced. Here are the pre- and post-retrofit results when we asked how satisfied occupants were with their light levels.

Schuetter, S., “LED fixtures and integrated controls for advanced holistic lighting solutions”, ESTCP Project EW-201722.

Do luminaire level lighting controls live up to their promise?

We tested the system BY REPLACING THE FLUORESCENT SYSTEMS IN THREE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OFFICE BUILDINGS at two Air National Guard Bases.

RESULTS

ENERGY SAVINGS: 69% OF LIGHTING ENERGY, 2.5 kWh/ft2

COST SAVINGS: UTILITY BILL SAVINGS: $0.42/ft2

OCCUPANT SATISFACTION

TuningLEDs Occupancy Daylight

9%48% 3% 9%

However, cost e�ectiveness for demonstration project remains challenging. 20-year simple payback.

Other demonstration projects show more favorable economics (approaching 8 years). Trend is continued reduction in cost, which will continue to improve economics.

This project was supported by a grant from the Department of Defense’s Environmental Security Technology Certification Program.

Lighting retrofits traditionally focus on LEDs without controls.PROBLEM