Upload
nalaka-de-silva
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
1/43
PROJECT REPORT
FOR THE
DELTA LAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICTWATER CONSERVATION PROJECT
PREPARED FOR:
DELTA LAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT
ROUTE 1, BOX 225, EDCOUCH, TEXAS 78538
UNDER THE AUSPICES OF:
TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD and
TEXAS STATE ENERGY CONSERVATION OFFICE
TWDB Contract No. G18900
PREPARED BY:AXIOM-BLAIR ENGINEERING
2711 WEST ANDERSON LANE, SUITE 210
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78757
October 27, 2003
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
2/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................................................1
2 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 6
3 DISTRICT INFORMATION.......................................................................................6
4 DISTRICT FACILITIES AND WATER DELIVERY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ... 7
5 DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND ASSESSMENT.............................. 7
6 DISTRICTS CONSERVATION COMMITMENT...................................................8
7 PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................... 9
7.1 Reservoir Renovation Project ...............................................................................9
7.2 Seepage Recovery Pilot Project..........................................................................11
7.3 Telemetry and Flow Measurement Project.........................................................12
7.4 Canal Rehabilitation Project ...............................................................................158 PROJECT BUDGET..................................................................................................17
9 DETERMINATION OF WATER AND ENERGY CONSERVED .........................18
9.1 Reservoir Renovation Project .............................................................................19
9.2 Seepage Recovery Pilot Project..........................................................................20
9.3 Telemetry and Flow Measurement Project.........................................................20
9.4 Canal Rehabilitation Project ...............................................................................21
10 ECONOMIC AND CONSERVATION ANALYSIS............................................22
10.1 Reservoir Renovation Project .............................................................................23
10.2 Seepage Recovery Pilot Project..........................................................................24
10.3 Telemetry and Flow Measurement Project.........................................................24
10.4 Canal Rehabilitation Project ...............................................................................24
10.5 Project Aggregate ...............................................................................................25
11 PROJECT SCHEDULE .........................................................................................28
12 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATION...................................... 28
13 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION....................................................................31
13.1 Itemized Construction and O&M Cost ............................................................... 31
13.2 Construction Schedule........................................................................................37
13.3 Regulatory Compliance Documentation ........................................................... 38
Axiom-Blair Engineering i
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
3/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
APPENDICIES
Appendix 1 TCEQ District Information Report
Appendix 2 District Boundary Map
Appendix 3 District Water Supply System Map
Appendix 4 Reservoir Renovation Project Site Location Map
Appendix 5 Seepage Recovery Pilot Project Site Location Map
Appendix 6 Telemetry and Flow Measurement Site Location Map
Appendix 7 Canal Rehabilitation Project Site Location Map
Appendix 8 Feasibility Study for the Seepage Recovery Pilot Project
Appendix 9 Pipeline Hydraulic Study
Appendix 10 Texas A&M University Report Canal Ponding Test Results
Appendix 11 Environmental Summary Report
Appendix 12 Construction Drawings for Reservoir Renovation Project
Appendix 13 Construction Drawings for Telemetry and Flow Measurement Sites Project
Appendix 14 Construction Drawings for Canal Rehabilitation Project Task A
Appendix 15 Federally Listed as Threatened and Endangered Species in Texas
Axiom-Blair Engineering ii
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
4/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Project Applicant, Delta Lake Irrigation District (DLID or the District) was
established on June 22, 1914. The District is a political subdivision of the State of Texas,
organized under and by virtue of Article XVI, Section 59 of the Constitution of the Stateof Texas. It is operated under the statutes of Chapter 58 and Chapter 49, in part, of the
Texas Water Code. The District provides irrigation, drainage, and raw water supply
functions to 148.95 square miles of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties. The Delta Lake
Irrigation District has 182,966 acre-feet of authorized water rights and has the largest
amount of irrigated agriculture of the 28 irrigation districts in the Lower Rio Grande
Valley of Texas. The District is located within the boundaries of the Texas Water
Development Boards Rio Grande Regional Water Planning Group (Region M) and
includes the cities of Hargill, La Sara, Monte Alto and part of the City of Raymondville.
Figure 1 indicates the general project location. The Rio Grande is the only water source
for the Districts water supply system. All of the water diverted by the District, from the
Rio Grande, originates as surface water released by the International Boundary and Water
Commission from Falcon Reservoir. The District pumps water northward through a 32-
mile canal (Willacy Canal) originating at the Rio Grande and terminating at the southeast
corner of the East Reservoir of Delta Lake. The District water supply system consists of
250 miles of lined or partially lined canals, 42 miles of unlined canal and 122 miles of
unlined laterals. The District operates Delta Lake as a buffer for absorbing changes in
daily demand and mitigating the four-day travel time of water from Falcon Reservoir.
An assessment of the current and future water supplies and demands for Hidalgo andWillacy Counties are included in the Adopted Regional Water Plan (the Region M
Plan) published in January 2001 by the Texas Water Development Boards (TWDB) Rio
Grande Regional Water Planning Group (Region M). According to the Region M Plan,
the population in Hidalgo County is expected to more than double in the next 50 years;
while the population within Willacy County is expected to grow over 37 percent for the
same period. With the population growth, some of the land currently used for farming
and ranching will be converted to more urban use. As such, municipal water demand is
expected to more than double in Hidalgo County over the next 50 years, and increase
over 18 percent in Willacy County. This increase will be partially offset by an expected
29.3 percent decrease in irrigation demand in Hidalgo over the same period.
The Rio Grande is currently the only water source for the District and is expected to
remain the only source in the foreseeable future. Water in the Rio Grande from Fort
Quitman, Texas to the Gulf of Mexico is apportioned to the United States and Mexico
according to the 1944 Treaty. The apportionment is administrated by the International
Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC). Two international reservoirs, Amistad and
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 1
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
5/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
Falcon, provide controlled storage capacity for over eight million acre-feet of water
owned by the United States and Mexico. According to the Region M Plan, it is estimated
that (by 2050) the firm yield of the Amistad-Falcon Reservoir System will decrease by
nearly 10 percent.
Water conservation by the District has become increasingly important due to an enduringdrought that has affected the lower Rio Grande Valley over the past several years. The
drought and the projected decrease in irrigation water supply has required the District to
place a greater emphasis on water conservation to ensure the delivery of water to the
customers they serve. The proposed Water Conservation Projectis proposed to continue
the Districts commitment to conserve water and energy.
The proposed Project is comprised of four separate components. The first component,
theReservoir Renovation Project, consists of building a 17,000 linear foot bypass canal
along the eastern edge of the eastern reservoir of Delta Lake. The second component, the
Seepage Recovery Pilot Project, consists of a feasibility study into the possibility of
collecting water that seeps from the Main Canal and pumping it back into the system.
The third component, the Telemetry and Flow Measurements Sites Project, includes the
installation of flow measurement devices at 20 water diversion points to monitor
deliveries and send this information, by telemetry, to the District headquarters. The
fourth component, the Canal Rehabilitation Project, consists of preparing construction
drawings for the replacement approximately 17,800 linear feet of open channel laterals
with new gasket joint PVC or RCP pipe and the preparation of a plan to replace an
additional 13.4 miles of open channel laterals with pipe.
Constructing the proposed bypass canal will reduce the seepage and evaporation losses
associated with transporting water through the East Reservoir of Delta Lake. Recovering
seepage water along the Willacy Canal will reduce the pumping costs by reducing the
elevation difference. The installation of the flow measurement devices will allow the
District to remotely measure the amount of water delivered from each of the 20 diversion
points to the different canal systems. By monitoring the information, the District will be
able to reduce the amount of excess water that is passed through the system. Replacing
open laterals with pipelines will reduce the evaporation and seepage losses, reduce on-
farm demand and reduce the quantity of water spilled. Reducing and/or recovering losses
due to evaporation, seepage and spills will allow more water to be available to eachcustomer in times of shortages.
Given that the Rio Grande is the Districts only anticipated water source, it is the
Districts goal to maximize efficiency by reducing excess pumping and seepage and
evaporation losses. Increased efficiency will postpone the need to develop new water
supplies. Since agricultural crops are a commodity, and their annual yield is dependent
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 2
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
6/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
on many factors (including price, weather, supply and demand), it is impossible to
determine the exact date that the development of new water supplies may become a
necessity. Regardless of the water source, the Delta Lake Irrigation District is committed
to conserving both water and energy today and in the future.
The total project budget for the Water Conservation Project is estimated to be $7.12million. The budget includes funds from the Texas State Energy Conservation Office
through the Texas Water Development Board as well as contributions by the District.
Construction cost for the project (including project administration and contingencies) is
estimated to be $7.12 million.
An itemized construction cost estimate was prepared for each component of the Districts
Water Conservation Project. The estimated cost for theReservoir Renovation Projectis
$1,511,675. The estimated cost for the Seepage Recovery Pilot Projectis $669,640. The
estimated cost for the Telemetry and Flow Measurement Sites Projectis $794,530. The
estimated construction cost for the Canal Rehabilitation Projectis $4,031,496. Itemized
annual operation and maintenance (O&M) cost estimates were also prepared for each
component of the Districts Water Conservation Project. Annual O&M costs are
estimated to be $10,120 for theReservoir Renovation Project, $650 (exclusive of energy
costs) for the Seepage Recovery Pilot Project, $32,170 for the Telemetry and Flow
Measurement Sites Project and$3,360 for the Canal Rehabilitation Project.
In June 2001, the Bureau of Reclamation published a set of guidelines for evaluating
TWDB-SECO Water Conservation Projects1. The document describes the three
legislated operational efficiency criteria for evaluating water conservation projects:Annual acre-feet of water saved per dollar of construction costAnnual energy saved (BTUs) per dollar of construction cost, andAnnual economic savings per dollar of construction cost
The proposed project as a whole will result in:
Annual water savings of 13,808 acre feet,Annual energy savings of 2,530,387,224 BTUsEstimated construction cost of $7,120,000,Estimated annual operation and maintenance costs of $19,420,
The projected savings are:
0.0717 ac-ft per dollar of construction cost
1United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Guidelines For Preparing and
Reviewing Proposals for Water Conservation and Improvement Projects Under Public Law 106-576June, 2001
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 3
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
7/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
12,950 BTUs per dollar of construction cost$0.344 per dollar of economic savings per dollar of construction cost.
The Operational Efficiency criteria may also be expressed in the inverse, representing the
amount in dollars expended, based on estimated construction cost, per unit of savings:
$13.94 per ac-ft
A more useful measure of the value of the cost per acre-foot of water saved is the dollars
of construction cost per present value of the quantity of water saved by the project. This
values equals:
$30.97 per acre foot
Once the Water Conservation Project receives funding, it is estimated that the time to
completion, including bidding and construction, will be approximately 2.5 years. The
construction contracts for each component of the project could both be in place in
approximately four months.
An Environmental Summary Report was prepared for the Project. Preparation of the
report utilized information from a wide variety of sources including the TCEQ, the U.S.
Census Bureau, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Texas Parks and Wildlife
Department, the Texas Historical Commission, the National Weather Service, the U.S.
Soil Conservation Service, the Texas Department of Transportation and others.
Additional information was collected through field reconnaissance and interviews with
District personnel. The Environmental Summary Report was submitted to the Texas
Parks and Wildlife Department, Texas Historical Commission, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service for review.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has determined that since the project sites do not
contain any areas subject to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act or Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, a Department of the Army permit is not required. The Texas
Historical Commission reviewed the project under Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Antiquities Code of Texas and determined that the
project should have no effect on historic properties and that no further review would be
necessary from the Texas Historical Commission. Subsequent communications between
the Commission and Reclamation are currently being addressed. Additional commentsreceived from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Texas Parks and Wildlife
Department have been addressed through correspondence and additional specifications
were added to the Construction Drawings.
Regardless of these jurisdictional determinations, it is the Districts goal to protect the
environment and its inhabitants. The Construction Drawings include specifications
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 4
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
8/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
requiring the contractor to protect existing waterways, vegetation and wildlife from
unnecessary disruptions during construction. In addition, the District will file the
required Notice of Intent with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)
and prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan prior to construction.
Delta Lake Irrigation District
Figure 1. Project Location Map
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 5
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
9/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
2 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Delta Lake Irrigation Districts Water Conservation Project (the
Project) is to preserve and extend the existing water resources of the Lower Rio Grande
Valley. In general, water will be preserved by constructing improvements, which willreduce or recover losses due to seepage and evaporation and will allow for a more
efficient operation of the water delivery system as a whole. The Project is being
developed under the Lower Rio Grande Valley Water Resources Conservation and
Improvement Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-576) and was prepared in accordance with the
Guidelines For Preparing and Reviewing Proposals for Water Conservation and
Improvement Projects associated with the Act. Public Law 106-576 was passed to
encourage water supply improvement projects in select locations within the Rio Grande
basin. It provides funding for study, evaluation, design, and construction of irrigation
water system improvements. This Project Report was prepared to partially fulfill the
requirements of Contract Number G18900 between the Texas Water Development Board
and the Delta Lake Irrigation District.
The proposed Project is comprised of four separate components. The first component,
theReservoir Renovation Project, consists of building a 17,000 linear foot bypass canal
along the eastern edge of the eastern reservoir of Delta Lake. The second component, the
Seepage Recovery Pilot Project, consists of a feasibility study into the possibility of
collecting water that seeps from the Main Canal and pumping it back into the system.
The third component, the Telemetry and Flow Measurements Sites Project, includes the
installation of flow measurement devices at 20 water diversion points to monitordeliveries and send this information, by telemetry, to the District headquarters. The
fourth component, the Canal Rehabilitation Project, consists of preparing construction
drawings for the replacement approximately 17,800 linear feet of open channel laterals
with new gasket joint PVC or RCP pipe and the preparation of a plan to replace an
additional 13.4 miles of open channel laterals with pipe.
3 DISTRICT INFORMATION
The Project Applicant, Delta Lake Irrigation District (DLID or the District) was
established on June 22, 1914. The District is a political subdivision of the State of Texas,organized under and by virtue of Article XVI, Section 59 of the Constitution of the State
of Texas. It is operated under the statutes of Chapter 49 and 58 of the Texas Water Code.
The Delta Lake Irrigation District Board consists of the following five Directors:
Mr. Neal Galloway PresidentMr. Glen Hester Vice PresidentMr. Dale Murden Secretary
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 6
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
10/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
Mr. James Carlson DirectorMr. Tom Wetegrove Director
The Districts legal address is Delta Lake Irrigation District, Route 1, Box 225, Edcouch,
Texas 78538. The general manager, Troy Allen, may be reached at (956) 262-2101.
TCEQ District information reports are included as Appendix 1 to this report.
4 DISTRICT FACILITIES AND WATER DELIVERY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
The District provides irrigation, drainage and water supply functions to 148.95 square
miles of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties. As shown in Appendix 2, the District boundary
includes the cities of Hargill, La Sara, Monte Alto and part of the City of Raymondville.
The Rio Grande is the only water source for the District. All of the water diverted by the
District, from the Rio Grande, originates as surface water released by the International
Boundary and Water Commission from Falcon Reservoir. The District pumps water
northward through a 32-mile canal originating at the Rio Grande and terminating at thesoutheast corner of the East Reservoir of Delta Lake. The District water supply system
consists of 250 miles of lined or partially lined canals, 42 miles of unlined canal and 122
miles of unlined laterals. The District operates Delta Lake as a buffer for absorbing
changes in daily producer uses as well as equalization mitigating the four-day travel time
of water from Falcon Reservoir. As indicated in Appendix 1, Delta Lake is separated by
a roadway that divides the lake into a larger East Reservoir and a smaller West Reservoir.
The two reservoirs are connected via a culvert equipped with. with flow control gates.
Appendix 3 depicts the Districts water supply system.
5 DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND ASSESSMENT
The Delta Lake Irrigation District has 182,966 acre-feet of authorized water rights and
has the largest amount of irrigated agriculture of the 28 irrigation districts in the Lower
Rio Grande Valley of Texas. The District is located within the boundaries of the Texas
Water Development Boards Rio Grande Regional Water Planning Group (Region M)
and delivers water to the North Alamo Water Supply Corporation and the cities of
Raymondville, Lyford, Hargill, La Sara, and Monte Alto. The Districts 5-year average
annual water diversion was 80,944 acre-feet for 1998 to 2002. The Districts 5-year
average annual water diversion for irrigation is 75,704 acre-feet per year and 5,240 acre-feet per year for municipal and domestic water use. The District reports an estimated
water delivery efficiency of approximately 63%.
An assessment of the current and future water supplies and demands for Hidalgo and
Willacy Counties are included in the Adopted Regional Water Plan (the Region M
Plan) published in January 2001 by the Texas Water Development Boards (TWDB) Rio
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 7
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
11/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
Grande Regional Water Planning Group (Region M). According to the Region M Plan,
the population in Hidalgo County is expected to more than double in the next 50 years
from approximately 559,922 people in 2000 to 1,435,379 in 2050; while the population
within Willacy County is expected to grow over 37 percent from 21,165 to 29,077 for the
same period. With the population growth, some of the land currently used for farming
and ranching will be converted to more urban use. As such, municipal water demand is
expected to more than double in Hidalgo County over the next 50 years from 109,821 ac-
ft/yr to 226,715 ac-ft/yr, and increase over 18 percent in Willacy County from 6,395 ac-
ft/yr to 7,553 ac-ft/yr. This increase will be partially offset by an expected 29.3 percent
decrease in irrigation demand in Hidalgo County (from 849,696 ac-ft/yr to 601,000 ac-
ft/yr) over the same period.
The Rio Grande is currently the only water source for the Delta Lake Irrigation District
and is expected to remain the only source in the foreseeable future. Water in the Rio
Grande from Fort Quitman, Texas to the Gulf of Mexico is apportioned to the UnitedStates and Mexico according to the 1944 Treaty. The apportionment is administrated by
the International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC). Two international
reservoirs, Amistad and Falcon, provide controlled storage capacity for over eight million
acre-feet of water owned by the United States and Mexico. The storage capacity of these
reservoirs is reserved for two purposes, flood control (2.25 million acre-feet) and water
supply (6.05 million acre-feet) (Region M Plan). According to the Region M Plan, it is
estimated that (by 2050) the firm yield of the Amistad-Falcon Reservoir System will
decrease by nearly 115,000 acre-feet, or by nearly 10 percent, due to silt accumulation.
The water right system for the middle (between Amistad and Falcon Reservoirs) and
lower (below Falcon Reservoir) Rio Grande provides a high degree of reliability fordomestic-municipal-industrial (DMI) water rights by continually maintaining a DMI
reserve of 225,000 acre-feet in the reservoir system. Irrigation water rights are allocated
from the residual stored water in the reservoirs and, therefore, vary from year to year.
6 DISTRICTS CONSERVATION COMMITMENT
Water conservation by the District has become increasingly important due to an enduring
drought that has affected the lower Rio Grande Valley over the past several years. The
drought and the projected decrease in irrigation water supply has required the District to
place a greater emphasis on water conservation to ensure the delivery of water to the
customers they serve. Historically, the District has aggressively sought to develop ways
to deliver the maximum amount of water possible to each turnout. The District has
implemented metering of all irrigation deliveries and has invested approximately
$400,000 per year replacing small open laterals with buried pipelines. Last year the
District installed 4,800 linear feet of 36 RCP and 10,000 linear feet of 18 PVC pipe.
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 8
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
12/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
This has increased the efficiency of the District and the growers by reducing the energy
used per acre irrigated.
The proposed Water Conservation Project is proposed to continue the Districts
commitment to conserve water and energy. The components were selected as priorities
from a list of 11 major and 37 minor projects identified throughout the Districts waterdelivery system. Constructing the proposed bypass canal will reduce the seepage and
evaporation losses associated with transporting water through the East Reservoir of Delta
Lake. Recovering seepage water along the Willacy Canal will reduce the pumping costs.
The installation of the flow measurement devices will allow the District to remotely
measure the amount of water delivered from each of the 20 diversion points to the
different canal systems. By monitoring the information, the District will be able to
reduce the amount of excess water that is passed through the system. Replacing open
laterals with pipelines will reduce the evaporation and seepage losses, reduce on-farm
demand and reduce the quantity of water spilled. Reducing and/or recovering losses dueto evaporation, seepage and spills will allow more water to be available to each customer
in times of shortages.
Given that the Rio Grande is the Districts only anticipated water source, it is the
Districts goal to maximize efficiency by reducing excess pumping and seepage and
evaporation losses. Increased efficiency will postpone the need to develop new water
supplies. Since agricultural crops are a commodity, and their annual yield is dependent
on many factors (including price, weather, supply and demand), it is impossible to
determine the exact date that the development of new water supplies may become a
necessity. Regardless of the water source, the Delta Lake Irrigation District is committedto conserving both water and energy today and in the future.
7 PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7.1 Reservoir Renovation Project
TheReservoir Renovation Projectconsists of the construction of a bypass canal along the
eastern edge of the East Reservoir of Delta Lake. This bypass canal will begin at the
southeastern corner of the reservoir, where the Main Canal supplies the lake, and
terminate at a pump house along the reservoirs north edge. A project location mapshowing the bypass canal location is included as Appendix 4.
This project is crucial to supply irrigation and domestic water to the northern and eastern
portions of the District including the cities of Raymondville and Lyford during periods of
drought. With the current system, raw water is transported to these areas via the Delta
Lake. It has been estimated that in a dry summer month, that over 1,700 acre-feet of
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 9
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
13/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
water would need to be placed in the East Reservoir to deliver about 400 acre-feet at the
northeast corner to overcome losses due to evaporation. This represents a loss rate of
approximately 77 percent. If current drought conditions continue and expected future
decreases in water supplies occur, the delivery of raw water through Delta Lake will not
be possible.
In 1998 and again in 2002, the Rio Grande Valley was under extreme drought conditions.
As such, the Delta Lake Irrigation District came very close to depleting its allocation of
irrigation water and thus the transport water that is necessary to convey the municipal
water through the East Reservoir of Delta Lake. North Alamo Water Supply Corporation
(NAWSC) supplies the municipal water to the majority of the rural residents in Willacy
County and applied to the Texas Water Development Board for emergency grant funds to
construct the by pass canal described above. A combination rain and increased water
allocations in late summer of 2002 averted the short-term water shortage, but not the risk
that the shortage will occur again. Grant money was approved in early 2003 for theproject submitted by NAWSC. NAWSC is responsible for any technical or
administrative activities under the funding authorized by TWDB Resolution 03-9 and no
funds for such activities are being provided to Delta Lake Irrigation District or their
consultants for such activities. Copies of all technical information developed in
conjunction with the Districts TWDB-SECO project will be provided to North Alamo
WSC. The District and North Alamo will have periodic meetings to coordinate the
project and make sure that no duplication of effort is occurring.
Four potential project alternatives were identified and analyzed; construction of a new
canal and associated improvements, construction of a 24-inch transmission main,construction of a 36-inch transmission main and the no-build alternative. Preliminary
cost estimates for the 24 and 36-inch transmission mains were estimated to be from 2.2 to
4.6 times the estimated cost of the new canal. Both pipeline alternatives would require
significant clearing along the same general alignment proposed for the canal. Although
these widths are roughly half of that required for channel construction, a clear-cut swath
would still be required through the project alignment. Additionally, the transmission
capacity of the pipelines is extremely limited (12 to 27 percent) relative to the canal
alternative. No overwhelming benefits were identified that justified the additional cost
and limited capacity of the transmission main alternatives. Construction of either
transmission main was therefore eliminated as a viable alternative.
Numerous potential negative impacts are associated with the no-build alternative.
Severe curtailment of water use would be required resulting in damage to small-scale
agriculture, lawns, trees, landscaping, etc. The Development of emergency interim water
supplies would be necessary resulting in increased cost, fuel usage, air pollution and
traffic. There would also be a higher potential for public health and safety problems
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 10
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
14/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
typically associated with inadequate water supplies including loss of system pressure,
system contamination, longer distribution system residence times, etc. As a result of the
significant potential negative impacts, the no-build alternative was eliminated from
consideration. Construction of a bypass canal and associated improvements was
therefore selected as the recommended alternative.
The proposed bypass canal will be constructed along the inner edge of the eastern
embankment, utilizing the existing berm. The western embankment will be constructed
from material dredged from the bottom of the reservoir. The trapezoidal cross section
has a ten-foot bottom width, 2:1 side slopes and has been designed to carry a minimum
flow of 160 cfs. The bypass canal will not be lined in conjunction with this project.
Control structures have been designed to accommodate the six existing diversion points
along the eastern edge of the reservoir. Radial gates will be installed at the Main and J
Canals to provide better flow control. The radial gates at the Main Canal will allow the
East Reservoir of Delta Lake to continue to be utilized as a reservoir for the District, but
in an off-line instead of in-line capacity. The proposed control structures will allow
the steady flow of water to the bypass canal and excess water will be diverted into the
East Reservoir. In times of extreme water shortages, this system will allow the District to
still provide raw water when lake levels are low. The radial gates at the J canal will
allow the flow to be measured and provide a drain for the East Reservoir. The existing
control structures at the No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3 Canals will be replaced with concrete
vaults containing weirs to allow the District to control and measure the flow into each of
the laterals. Concrete wells will be constructed at Relift pumps houses No. 9 and No.
47. Concrete flumes will be constructed along the bypass canal upstream of each of thecontrol structures and flow measurement devices will be installed at each of the diversion
points. These flow measurement devices will be connected to the proposed telemetry
system.
7.2 Seepage Recovery Pilot Project
The Seepage Recovery Pilot Projectconsists of a feasibility study into the possibility of
collecting water that seeps from the Main Canal and pumping it back into the system.
Because of the size of the canal, concrete or urethane lining were rejected as possible
alternatives because they were estimated to be prohibitively costly. The seepagerecovery project was selected as the recommended alternative. It was estimated that the
energy required to pump the recovered seepage back into the Main Canal will be
approximately 25% of the energy required to pump water from the Rio Grande, or for
every acre-foot of seepage water that is salvaged, the District will reduce energy cost per
acre-foot by 75%. A Project Location Map showing the study area is included as
Appendix 5.
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 11
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
15/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
A feasibility study was performed to determine the most economical region of the project
study area to recover seepage water. A copy of the feasibility study is included as
Appendix 8. The project study area was defined as the entire length of the Willacy Canal
from the Rio Grande to Delta Lake. The Soil Survey of Hidalgo County, Texas, the Soil
Survey of Willacy County, Texas and the Soil Survey of Cameron County, Texas,
published by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service in
cooperation with the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, were consulted to determine
the general soil characteristics of the study area. According to the Surveys, soils along
the Willacy Canal range from clay, with a low permeability rate of less than 0.06 in/hr, to
fine sandy loam, with a permeability rate between 0.6 to 6.0 in/hr. The approximately
three-mile length of canal from the North Floodway southward to railroad crossing was
selected for the feasibility study area, due to its soil characteristics and its identification
by District personnel as a high seepage area.
Once the feasibility study area was identified, a geotechnical engineering firm was hiredto perform borings at regular intervals along the embankment and adjacent roadway to
determine the actual permeability rate, the depth of the water table and the quality of the
water in the canal and the borrow ditch. This information was utilized to design the
subsurface telescoping toe drain system and the 5 cfs pump station to pump the recovered
water back into the Willacy Canal.
7.3 Telemetry and Flow Measurement Project
The Telemetry and Flow Measurement Project includes the installation of flow
measurement devices at 20 diversion points within the Districts water supply system.These devices will be permanently installed to monitor deliveries into particular laterals
of the system and send this information, by telemetry, to the District headquarters. This
information will allow the District to track water usage, identify where losses are
occurring and allow the District to forecast and provide for future water uses. By having
more information, the District can operate the system more efficiently. A project location
map showing the flow measurement sites is included as Appendix 6.
The 20 diversion points were designed with one or multiple measurement devices
depending on the diversion structures located on the site. Each of the measurement
devices on the individual sites will be connected to a single telemetry system. Thediversion structures can be broken into two categories, pump houses (closed conduit
flow) and check structures (open channel flow).
At all of the pump house sites, water is drawn from the supply canal with single or
multiple pumps and discharged to a pump well. Once the water enters the pump well it is
distributed to single or multiple distribution lines for delivery to the customer(s). Each
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 12
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
16/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
pump well is constructed with a wall that acts an overflow weir. If the pump produces
more water than the customer uses, the water fills up the well, eventually spills over the
weir and flows through a recycle line that returns excess water back into the supply canal.
When small flows are required, a valve at the bottom of the weir wall can be opened to
allow water to flow directly from the supply canal to the distribution line without the use
of the pump. With the present system, the District has no mechanism to routinely
quantify the amount of water a pump house is producing in relation to the amount
actually delivered to the customer.
The District wanted a mechanism for determining how much water each of the pump
houses were producing so they could compare this to the amount of water needed. In
addition, they wanted to be able to reduce the amount of water being recycled without
constant visual monitoring. It was decided that the flow from each pump would be
metered with either a run-time meter or a pipeline meter depending on the pump house
characteristics. Each of the pump well weir walls would be equipped with a submersiblepressure transmitter to monitor the level of the water in the well. When the water level
exceeds the height of the weir for a specified period, the pump would shut off. Once the
water level drops below the crest of the weir, and the resting period has passed, the pump
would again run.
Due to their reliability, accuracy and suitability for the sites, saddle mount propeller
meters were chosen to meter the flow in the pump discharge line. Each meter will be
protected from vandalism and theft by either a lockable concrete or welded expanded
metal enclosure. Concrete enclosures will be constructed at sites where the discharge
pipe(s) are located below grade and welded expanded metal enclosures will beconstructed at sites where the discharge pipe(s) are located above grade. Sites equipped
with a propeller meter will also be equipped with a calibration port, located upstream of
the meter, to calibrate the meter with a portable flow measurement device. At sites
without sufficient pipe length to install a propeller meter, a run-time meter will be
installed on the pump to measure the amount of time the pump is running. The pump
characteristics will be utilized to prepare a rating curve for converting the measured time
to flow.
At each of the check structures, the flow will be measured downstream from the check
structure using a flow measurement structure or device. The canals containing the checkstructures could be divided into two categories; large (top width in excess of 20-feet),
earthen canals and small, concrete-lined canals. Based on their ability to be computer
calibrated using as-built dimensions, long-throated flumes were selected for flow
measurement of the small, concrete-lined canals. A cross-section from the existing canal
was utilized to design a flume for each of the sites using the WinFlume software. Rating
tables were prepared for each of the flumes based on the proposed design. Once the
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 13
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
17/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
flumes have been constructed, as-built dimensions will be tables for use in determining
flows at different elevations. Each flume will be equipped with a submersible pressure
transmitter, housed in a stilling well, for determining the water level in the approach
section of the flume and a staff gage for visual verification.
It was decided that a velocity flow meter would be the most cost effective and accuratemetering device for the large earthen canals. A Doppler meter, which measures velocity
in the channel, will be installed at each of these sites. The meter will be installed in a
concrete slab constructed along one bank of the channel. The slab will be located
sufficiently downstream from the check structure to minimize unsteady flow. The meter
will measure the velocity of the water and will be equipped with an integrated pressure
sensor for water surface level measurement. A rating curve will be developed for each of
the canal Doppler meter sites to determine the flow. The meters will be calibrated using
a portable metering device.
Three diversion points included in the project did not fall into any of the above
categories. The No.1, No. 2 and No. 3 Canals currently receive water from the East
Reservoir of Delta Lake via a pipeline through the existing embankment. Each of the
existing diversion structures will be removed and replaced with a concrete vault equipped
with a flow measurement device. A rating curve will be developed for each weir and will
be utilized, along with the water level, to provide the District with flow data. This
information will allow the District to control and measure the flow into each of the
laterals.
A telemetry system will be installed at each of the 20 diversion points for the District toperiodically, and on demand, poll for data from the field devices (remote telemetry unit
(RTU)), process the data into a central data base (base computer), send controls to field
devices and display the data in useful formats to water operation personnel. A Base
System will be located at the District Headquarters and will consist of a base computer,
which will hold the central database to store and convert all of the data from the RTUs,
and an antenna to receive from and transmit data to the remote telemetry systems. The
base computer will be equipped with software that will display current, last 24 hours and
monthly water and flow level data of any or all of the RTUs. It will also store all
engineering and conversion data necessary for converting flow.
A remote telemetry system will be installed at each of the flow measurement sites. Each
system will consist of the following:
Remote Telemetry Unit (RTU)Radio and RF ModemAC/DC Linear Power Supply
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 14
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
18/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
These items will be mounted inside a steel NEMA 12 enclosure on a panel with room for
a storage battery to be placed on the bottom of the enclosure. A radio antenna will be
mounted on a 20-foot antenna mast for transmitting and receiving data from the Base
System.
At sites equipped with a pump house, the telemetry system enclosure will be mountedinside, on the specified wall, and wired to the existing power source. At sites without a
pump house, but where electricity is available, the telemetry system enclosure will be
installed in a steel vandal box and wired to the existing power source. When electricity is
not available, the telemetry system enclosure will be installed in a steel vandal box and a
solar panel will be added to the antenna mast to provide power.
Once the telemetry system enclosures are mounted, the RTU will be wired to the
metering device(s), the pressure transmitter, the existing pump panel(s), solar panel and
antenna, as specified in the construction drawings. The system will then be programmed
with the calibration coefficients for each site and District personnel will be trained in the
operation and calibration procedures for the Telemetry System.
7.4 Canal Rehabilitation Project
The Canal Rehabilitation Project is to replace approximately 16.8 miles of existing
concrete lined canal with buried pipeline. The following locations were evaluated as
canal rehabilitation sites:
A E-2 Canal (42 to E-2-M), E-2-M Canal, RLP No. 6 17,800 l.f.
B E-2-L Canal 12,250 l.f.C E-2 Canal (E-2-M to End) 5,150 l.f.D E-2-E Canal, RLP No. 45 15,950 l.f.E PE-10-7 Canal, RLP No. 7 7,300 l.f.F E-2 Canal (E Canal to RLP No. 45) 4,250 l.f.G E-2-G Canal, E-2-H Canal 13,950 l.f.H A Canal (A-20 to End) 11,900 l.f.
A project location map showing the canal repair sites is included as Appendix 7. This
component will save water by reducing seepage and evaporation losses and their
associated pumping requirements and costs. This will result in the flow rate of water
delivered to individuals to be increased or allow for a greater number of fields to besimultaneously irrigated.
Four rehabilitation options were considered for the damaged canal segments; relining
with concrete, line with an impervious liner, replace the canal with a pipeline or do
nothing. Preliminary cost estimates were prepared and revealed that replacing the
existing concrete en-masse was 100 to 200 percent more expensive than lining the canal
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 15
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
19/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
with an impervious liner or replacing the canal with a pipeline. Additionally, the soils in
the area shrink and swell extensively in response to moisture changes. No benefits were
found to justify the additional cost and future problems of installing new concrete lining.
Replacing the existing canals with concrete was therefore eliminated as a viable
alternative.
According to an on-going study by Texas A&M University, concrete lined canals similar
in size and soil type can lose from 220 to 375 acre-feet/mile per year of water due to
seepage. Adding this to a loss of 2.2 acre-feet/mile per year due to evaporation converts
to a total from 749 to 1396 acre-feet of water loss per year for the proposed 3.37 miles of
canal. With the ongoing drought and the Districts commitment to water and energy
savings, the no-build alternative was eliminated from consideration.
Both lining the canal with an impervious liner and replacing the canal with a pipeline had
the positive benefit of eliminating seepage and low maintenance costs, but each had its
limits on cost-effectiveness. It was found that at higher flow rates, it was more cost-
effective to line the canal with a liner. At low flow rates, replacing the canal with a
pipeline was more cost-effective. Since both the liner and the pipeline would be installed
along the existing canal alignment, the environmental impacts of the projects would be
very similar. However, the segments selected for replacement are small laterals with low
flow rates and based on the above observations, replacing the canals with pipeline will be
the most cost-effective alternative.
A survey will be completed for each task. Data from the survey will then be utilized to
prepare a hydraulic study and prepare construction drawings and specifications. Task Awas completed in conjunction with this Project to determine appropriate cost estimates
for the subsequent tasks. A detailed hydraulic study for Task A was performed using the
EPANET software to determine the flow requirements, and thus the repair option, for
each segment of the affected canal. Once the flow requirements were determined, the
study was utilized to determine the size for each pipe segment. The Pipeline Hydraulic
Study for Task A is included as Appendix 9.
All proposed pipelines larger than 42-inches will be installed as reinforced concrete pipe
(RCP) and those equal to or smaller than 42-inches will be installed as polyvinyl chloride
(PVC) pipe. The pipeline will be installed in one of the embankments of the existingcanal, with its alignment parallel to the edge of the existing canal. A concrete inlet
structure will be constructed at the intersection of the proposed pipeline and the supply
canal. This structure will be located to ensure the inlet of the pipeline will remain
submerged and thus, ensuring the pipeline will remain pressurized. A turnout connection
box will be constructed at each point of delivery along the alignments. These boxes will
provide access points for debris removal by District personnel. The line gates at each
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 16
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
20/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
turnout can be locked in place for the duration of the delivery once the flows have been
adjusted by District staff. This method allows for the use of portable flow meters rather
than having a flow meter at each point of delivery. A drain pipeline will be provided at
the end of each pipeline. Once the pipelines are in place, the existing canal will be
backfilled with material from each of the embankments to provide a uniform slope across
the District right-of-way.
8 PROJECT BUDGET
The total project budget for the Water Conservation Project is estimated to be $7.12
million. As shown in Table 1, below, the proposed budget was categorized by task and
includes the necessary mitigation costs, if any. The District has expended approximately
$22,000 of its own funds and received a grant from the Texas State Energy Conservation
Office through the Texas Water Development Board for $253,020. Construction cost for
the project (including project administration and contingencies) is estimated to be $7.12million. The first year operation and maintenance costs for both components of the
project are estimated to be $46,300.
An itemized construction cost estimate was prepared for each component of the Districts
Water Conservation Project. The estimated cost for theReservoir Renovation Projectis
$1,511,675. The cost estimate includes the construction of 17,000 l.f. of bypass canal
and associated diversion structures. The cost for theReservoir Renovation Projectwas
not included in Reclamations 50% cost share portion of the project [0.50 x ($7,120,000
$1,511,675)] because of concerns of Reclamations regarding the dewatering of the east
reservoir. The estimated cost for the Seepage Recovery Pilot Projectis $669,640. Thecost estimate includes the construction of approximately three miles of telescoping toe
drain and a 5 cfs pump station. The estimated cost for the Telemetry and Flow
Measurement Sites Project is $794,530. The cost estimate includes the construction,
installation and calibration of the flow measurement devices at each of the 20 sites; the
fabrication, installation, and programming of the base and remote telemetry systems; and
the training of District personnel. The estimated construction cost for the Canal
Rehabilitation Projectis $4,031,496. This cost includes the installation of approximately
16.8 miles of distribution pipeline, turnout pipeline and associated concrete structures.
The cost also includes the backfilling and re-grading of the existing concrete-lined canal.
Detailed construction cost estimates are provided in Section 13.1.
Itemized annual operation and maintenance (O&M) cost estimates were also prepared for
each component of the Districts Water Conservation Project. Annual O&M costs are
estimated to be $10,120 for the Reservoir Renovation Project, $650 for the Seepage
Recovery Pilot Project, $32,170 for the Telemetry and Flow Measurement Sites Project
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 17
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
21/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
and$3,360 for the Canal Rehabilitation Project. Detailed O&M cost estimates are also
provided in Section 13.1
The amount and source of funds expended in the preparation of the project proposal and
in project planning were:
1. a proposal submitted to the Texas Water Development Board dated June 25,2002,
with a total cost of $22,000.
2. the Final Project Plan: Delta Lake Irrigation District, TWDB Contract G18900 (June
2003) with a final cost of approximately $35,000.
3. the Final Project Report: Delta Lake Irrigation District, TWDB Contract G18900
(August 2003) with a final cost of approximately $77,623.
The cost for preparation of project design documents, construction drawings,specifications, construction bid documents, funding contracts, and construction contracts
is approximately $140,397.
Table 1Project Budget (Excluding Any Federal Share for Reservoir Renovation Project)
Planning District State NADB Reclamation Total
Proposal to TWDB-SECO for Funds $22,000 $0 $0 $0 $22,00Final Project Plan $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $35,00Final Project Report $0 $77,623 $0 $0 $77,62
$22,000 $112,623 $0 $0 $134,62Design and Contracting Cost* $387,398 $140,397 $0 $0 $527,79
Total Planning and Design $409,398 $253,020 $0 $0 $662,41Construction Cost** $93,419 $0 $3,560,000 $2,804,163 $6,457,58
$502,817 $253,020 $3,560,000 $2,804,163 $7,120,007% 4% 50% 39% $7,120,00
Totals
Percent
Totals
*includes design work in addition to that work performed under the Districts TWDB project
** includes construction administration and mitigation costs, if any.
9 DETERMINATION OF WATER AND ENERGY CONSERVED
In conjunction with the preparation of the Project Report, estimates of the quantity ofwater and energy saved for each component were prepared. Existing studies of seepage,
evaporation and evapotranspiration were reviewed for their relevancy to this Project and
additional studies were performed to supplement the information.
Energy savings were calculated from the water savings for the reduced pumping costs
associated with each component. The assumed pumping system efficiency of 70% was
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 18
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
22/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
based on a pump efficiency of 74%2and electric motor efficiency of 95%3. An overall
pumping system efficiency of 70% is assumed as to be a reasonable average efficiency
for pumping plants of similar design and repair to that of the Districts main pumping
plant.
9.1 Reservoir Renovation Project
Water savings for theReservoir Renovation Projectare based on the amount of seepage
and evaporation saved by transporting municipal and irrigation water through the bypass
canal instead of through the East Reservoir of Delta Lake. Since Delta Lake will still be
utilized as an off-line reservoir when excess water is available, losses due to seepage and
evaporation will be incurred most of the year. When there is a water shortage, the bypass
canal will be isolated from the system and all available municipal and irrigation water
will be transported in the bypass canal. A conservative estimate would be to assume this
event would happen during July and August of any given year. Based on this
assumption, water savings attributable to evaporation is 1,958 ac-ft and water savings
attributable to seepage is 728 ac-ft for a total water savings of 2,685 ac-ft. Table 2
summarizes the estimated water savings for the Reservoir Renovation Project. The cost
for the regulating reservoir was not included in the federal cost-share for the project
Table 2
Length of Proposed Bypass Canal 17,000 ft
Average Width of Bypass Canal 17 ftArea of Water Surface of Bypass Canal 289,000 sfArea of Water Surface of Bypass Canal 7 acNet Change of Area of Water Surface of East Reservoir 1,200 ac
Net Annual Evaporation 0.15 in/dayNet Annual Evaporation 55 in/yr Annual Rainfall 24 in/yrTotal Annual Gross Evaporation 79 in/yr July and August Net Evaporation - Total 20 inches
Total East Reservoir July and August Net Evaporation 1,969 ac-ftTotal Bypass Canal July and August Net Evaporation 11 ac-ft
Total Water Savings Due to Evaporation 1,958 ac-ft
Estimated Seepage from Lake (K = .01 fpd) July-Aug 744 ac-ftEstimated Seepage from By Pass (K= 0.04 fpd) 16 ac-ft
Total Water Savings Due to Seepage 728 ac-ft
Total Water Savings per Year 2,685 ac-ftExpected Useful Life 50 yearsElevation Change of Water Pumped 36 ft
(2003 Price Base)
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 19
2 Johnson Pump, Axial and Mixed Flow Pump Curves, 1986.3 Sanks, Robert, editor, Pumping Station Design, Reed Elsevier Group, 1998., pgs. 409.
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
23/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
9.2 Seepage Recovery Pilot Project
The Seepage Recovery Pilot Projectis estimated to recover an estimated 2,280 ac-ft/year.
This figure was calculated from the amount of water that can be pumped using the 5 cfs
seepage recovery system. It is assumed that the pump station will be operable 9 months
of the year and a 95% duty cycle for the pump. Estimated water savings for the SeepageRecovery Pilot Projectare summarized in Table 3.
Table 3
Proposed Pump Flow 5 cfsProposed Pump Flow (9 months per year) 2,400 ac-ft/yr
Total Seepage Recovered* 2,280 ac-ft/yr
Total Water Savings 2,280 ac-ft
Expected Useful Life 15 yearsNet Elevation Change of Water Pumped 16 ft
* Assumes a 95% duty cycle for pump
CALCULATION OF ANNUAL WATER SAVINGS
(2003 Price Base)
9.3 Telemetry and Flow Measurement Project
The District is authorized to divert up to 174,776 acre-feet of irrigation water and 8,200
acre-feet of municipal and domestic water for a total of 182,966 acre-feet. On average,
over the five years from 1998 though 2002, the District diverted each year from the Rio
Grande 75,704 acre-feet of irrigation water and 5,240 acre-feet of municipal water for a
total of 80,944 acre-feet. This conservative value was used in determining the quantity of
water saved by installation of flow meters throughout the Districts delivery system and
an associated telemetry system to communicate the flow information back to District
staff. This real-time flow information will allow the District to optimize the quantity of
water diverted from the Rio Grande by more accurately matching municipal and
irrigation demands and reducing the quantity of water spilled from Districts delivery
system. In future years, because of increased municipal demand and because of the
current drought, the District expects to divert more than 110,000 acre-feet per year. It is
reasonable to assume that the District will, within 5 to 10 years, divert all of its municipal
water rights (8,200 acre-feet per year) and a minimum of 75,704 acre-feet per year ofirrigation water.
The estimate of the quantity of water lost due to system spills is approximately 7.5
percent of the annual irrigation water diverted or 5,678 acre-feet per year. A conservative
estimate of the quantity of water saved by the installation of the flow meter and telemetry
system is approximately 3.5 percent of the annual irrigation water diverted or 2,650 acre-
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 20
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
24/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
feet per year. As District staff increase their knowledge and skill in using the telemetry
system it is reasonable to assume that the District will reduce the quantity of water spilled
by an additional 500 to 1,000 acre-feet per year. Table 4 summarizes the estimated water
savings for the Telemetry and Flow Measurement Project.
Table 4
5-Yr Average Annual Irrigation Diversions (1998-2002) 75,704 ac-ftWater Losses Due to System Spills (7.5%) 5,678 ac-ftWater Savings (3.5%) 2,650 ac-ft
Total Water Savings per Year 2,650 ac-ftExpected Useful Life 15 yearsElevation Change of Water Pumped 36 ft
CALCULATION OF ANNUAL WATER SAVINGS
(2003 Price Base)
9.4 Canal Rehabilitation Project
The replacement of 14.8 miles of open laterals with pipelines is assumed to reduce
seepage by 4,070 acre-feet per year, reduce evaporation by 59 acre-feet per year, and
reduce on-farm irrigation demand by 2,064 acre-feet per year. The 275 acre-feet per mile
reduction in seepage is based on the results from a study performed by Texas A&M
Department of Agricultural Engineering Canal Ponding Test Results, Delta Lake
Irrigation District, Edcouch, Texas published in July 2000. A copy of the report is
included in Appendix 10. Ponding tests were performed on canal reaches of similar
width, soil type and extent of deterioration. An average loss rate of 1.00 ac-ft/mile perday was determined for canal segments. Since the canal segments in our study are
assumed to be in use 9 months of the year, an average loss rate of 275 ac-ft/mile/year was
used to calculate the total water lost to seepage. The estimated total annual evaporation
rate for these canals is 3.98 ac-ft/mi/year assuming the canals are in use 9 months of the
year. Based on this rate, the total evaporation loss from February to October for the 14.8
miles of open laterals is 59 ac-ft/year. Table 5 below summarizes the values used to
estimate the water savings for the Canal Rehabilitation Project.
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 21
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
25/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
Table 5
Length of Proposed Pipeline 17 mileLength of Existing Pipeline 2 mileLength of Existing Open Lateral 15 mileAverage Width of Open Lateral 8 ft
Average Water Depth 3.5 ftAverage Wetted Perimeter 13 lfArea of Water Surface 625,152 sfArea of Water Surface 14.4 ac
Net Annual Evaporation 0.15 in/dayNet Annual Evaporation 55 in/yr Annual Rainfall 24 in/yrTotal Annual Evaporation 79 in/yr
Evaporation Loss February through October* 49 in/yr Evaporation Loss February through October* 3.98 ac-ft/mi/yr
Total Evaporation Losses 59 ac-ft/yr
Estimated Seepage per Year Per Mile of Lateral* 275.0 ac-ft/yr Total Seepage Losses 4,070 ac-ft/yr
Total Off-Farm Water Savings 4,129 ac-ft/yr
Increased Application Efficiency 2,064 ac-ft/yr Total On-Farm Water Savings 2,064 ac-ft/yr
Total Water Savings 6,193 ac-ftExpected Useful Life 50 yearsElevation Change of Water Pumped 45 ft
* Assumes 9 months per year of Canal Use
Off-Farm Water Savings
On-Farm Water Savings
CALCULATION OF ANNUAL WATER SAVINGS
(2003 Price Base)
10 ECONOMIC AND CONSERVATION ANALYSIS
In June 2001, the Bureau of Reclamation published a set of guidelines for evaluating TWDB-
SECO Water Conservation Projects4. The document describes the three legislated operational
efficiency criteria for evaluating water conservation projects:
Annual acre-feet of water saved per dollar of construction costAnnual energy saved (BTUs) per dollar of construction cost, andAnnual economic savings per dollar of construction cost
4 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Guidelines For Preparing andReviewing Proposals for Water Conservation and Improvement Projects Under Public Law 106-576June, 2001
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 22
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
26/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
Table 6 provides a summary of the economic and conservation analysis for each project
component and the project as a whole. The key Operation Efficiency criteria, from the
Guidelines are highlighted in bold for each table.
Cost estimates are in 2003 dollars. It is assumed that the initial construction cost of each
component will be expended at the beginning of the first year. Net savings in water,energy and annual O&M are assumed to accrue at the end of year 2 and continue yearly
for the expected useful life.
For the analysis we assumed: a comprehensive discount rate r=6.125% for economic
values, and a social time value rate s=4.00% for the amortization of water and energy
savings. The inflation rate for the project life is also assumed to be 2.04%. Future
savings in water and energy are discounted to the present at the social time value rate of
4.00%.5
10.1 Reservoir Renovation Project
The proposed Reservoir Renovation component will result in:
Annual water savings of 2,685 acre feet,Annual energy savings of 482,206,573 BTUs,Estimated construction cost of $1,512,525,Estimated operation and maintenance costs of $10,120,Expected useful life of the project is 50 years.
The projected savings are:
0.0888 ac-ft per dollar of estimated construction cost,15,940 BTUs per dollar of estimated construction cost, and$0.133 of economic savings per dollar of estimated construction cost.
The Operational Efficiency criteria may also be expressed in the inverse, representing the
amount in dollars expended, based on estimated construction cost, per unit of savings:
$11.27/ac-ft$0.000063/BTU, and$7.54/$ savings
5 Texas A&M University Texas Water Resources Institute TR-203, Economic
Methodology for South Texas Irrigation Projects-RGIDECON, October, 2002
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 23
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
27/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
10.2 Seepage Recovery Pilot Project
The proposed Seepage Recovery component will result in:
Annual water savings of 2,280 acre feet,
Annual energy savings of 181,987,335 BTUs,Estimated construction cost of $573,937,Estimated operation and maintenance costs of $650,Expected useful life of the project is 15 years.
The projected savings are:
0.0596 ac-ft per dollar of estimated construction cost,4,756 BTUs per dollar of estimated construction cost, and
$0.122 of economic savings per dollar of estimated construction cost.
The Operational Efficiency criteria may also be expressed in the inverse, representing the
amount in dollars expended, based on estimated construction cost, per unit of savings:
$16.78/ac-ft$0.00021/BTU, and$8.17/$ savings
10.3 Telemetry and Flow Measurement Project
The proposed Telemetry and Flow Measurement component will result in:
Annual water savings of 2,650 acre feet,Annual energy savings of 475,920,826 BTUs,
Estimated construction cost of $623,980,Estimated operation and maintenance costs of $32,170,Expected useful life of the project is 15 years.
The projected savings are:
0.0637 ac-ft per dollar of estimated construction cost,11,441 BTUs per dollar of estimated construction cost, and($0.438) of economic savings per dollar of estimated construction cost.
The Operational Efficiency criteria may also be expressed in the inverse, representing the
amount in dollars expended, based on estimated construction cost, per unit of savings:
$15.70/ac-ft$0.000087/BTU, and$2.28/$ savings
10.4 Canal Rehabilitation Project
The proposed Canal Rehabilitation component will result in:
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 24
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
28/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
Annual water savings of 6,193 acre feet,Annual energy savings of 1,390,272,490 BTUs,Estimated construction cost of $4,409,558,Estimated operation and maintenance costs of ($23,520),Expected useful life of the project is 50 years.
The projected savings are:
0.0702 ac-ft per dollar of estimated construction cost,15,764 BTUs per dollar of estimated construction cost, and$0.729 of economic savings per dollar of estimated construction cost.
The Operational Efficiency criteria may also be expressed in the inverse, representing the
amount in dollars expended, based on estimated construction cost, per unit of savings:
$14.24 ac-ft$0.000063/BTU, and
$1.37/$ savings10.5 Project Aggregate
The proposed project as a whole will result in:
Annual water savings of 13,808 acre feet,Annual energy savings of 2,530,387,224 BTUs,Estimated construction cost of $7,120,000,Estimated operation and maintenance costs of $19,420,
The projected savings are:
0.0717 ac-ft per dollar of estimated construction cost,12,950 BTUs per dollar of estimated construction cost, and$0.344 of economic savings per dollar of estimated construction cost.
The Operational Efficiency criteria may also be expressed in the inverse, representing the
amount in dollars expended, based on estimated construction cost, per unit of savings:
$13.94/ac-ft$0.000077/BTU, and$2.91/$ savings
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 25
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
29/43
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
30/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District
Axiom-Blair Engineering
Reservoir
Renovation Project
Seepage Recovery
Pilot Project
Telemetry and Flow
Mesurement Sites
Project
Economic SavingsConstruction Cost ($) $1,512,525 $573,937 $623,980Expected Useful Life (years) 50 15 15Cost of Energy ($/kW-hr) $0.10 $0.10 $0.10Energy Savings ($/yr) $14,133 $5,334 $13,948Operation & Maintenance Cost Savings ($/yr) $10,120 $650 $32,170
Dollars of Economic Savings ($/yr) $4,013 $4,684Total Dollars of Economic Savings ($) $200,633 $70,256
Dollars of Economic Savings per Dollars of Construction Cost ($/$) 0.133 0.122Dollars of Construction Cost per Dollars of Economic Savings ($/$) 7.54 8.17Discounted Present ValuesDiscount Rate 6.125% 6.125% 6.125%
Inflation Rate 2.043269% 2.043269% 2.043269%Present Value of Economic Savings ($) $82,885 $50,073
Present Value of Economic Savings per Dollar of Construction Cost ($/$) 0.055 0.087Dollars of Construction Cost per Present Value of Economic Savings ($/$) 18.25 11.46
(2003 Price Base)
SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC AND CONSERVATION ANALYSIS RESULTS
Table 6 (Sheet 2 of 2)
($18,222)($273,323)
(0.438)(2.28)
($194,802)
(0.312)(3.20)
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
31/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
11 PROJECT SCHEDULE
Once the Water Conservation Project receives funding, it is estimated that the time to
completion, including bidding and construction, will be approximately 2.5 years. As the
attached Project Schedule (Section 13.2) shows, the construction contracts for eachcomponent of the project could both be in place in approximately four months. The
estimated construction time for the Telemetry and Flow Measurement Project is four
months with a two-week training session, 20 months for the Canal Rehabilitation Project,
and three months for the Seepage Recovery Pilot Project. The estimated construction
time for the Reservoir Renovation Project will be 45 days for three phases for a total time
of 4.5 months. If the project is funded by November 2003, the estimated completion date
will be March 2006.
12 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATION
An Environmental Summary Report was prepared for the Project. Preparation of the
report utilized information from a wide variety of sources including the TCEQ, the U.S.
Census Bureau, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Texas Parks and Wildlife
Department, the Texas Historical Commission, the National Weather Service, the U.S.
Soil Conservation Service, the Texas Department of Transportation and others.
Additional information was collected through field reconnaissance and interviews with
District personnel. The report included a description of the proposed project including its
purpose and need, and funding sources. The Environmental Summary also detailed the
environmental impacts of the project based on the regulatory compliance requirements ofthe National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA), the Endangered Species Act (ESA), Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and
other relevant Federal and State statutes. The database for the Native American Indian
Tribes was reviewed for possible tribal lands in the area. A copy of the Environmental
Summary Report is included as Appendix 11.
The following environmental impact categories were addressed in the Environmental
Summary Report:
Social and Economic Impacts
Soils
Vegetation Impacts
Endangered and/or Threatened Species
Disruption to Wildlife Habitat
Weather
Wetlands and Waterways
Flood Zones
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 28
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
32/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
Storm Water
Effects of Earthwork on Water Bearing Bodies
Public Land
Land Use
Farmlands
Historical-Cultural Resources
Air Quality and Acoustic Impacts
Hazardous Materials
Traffic Hazards and Disruptions
Clearing, Grubbing and Spoil Disposal
Obstruction of Scenic Views
The Environmental Summary Report was submitted to the Texas Parks and Wildlife
Department, Texas Historical Commission, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service for review. Copies of the review correspondence
from each of the above agencies are included in Section 13.3.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has determined that since the project sites do not
contain any areas subject to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act or Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act, a Department of the Army permit is not required. The Texas
Historical Commission reviewed the project under Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Antiquities Code of Texas and determined that the
project should have no effect on historic properties. No further review would be
necessary from the Texas Historical Commission.
On October 15, 2003, staff member of Reclamations Austin, Texas office met with TheDistricts general manager and engineer and presented a letter dated September 15, 2003
signed by Pam Opiela for Lawrence Oaks of the Texas Historical Commission regarding
the Canal Renovation portion of the proposed Water Conservation Projects. The
comments made in such letter conflict or contradict previous letters from the Commission
regarding such project. It is anticipated that Reclamations concerns with the
Commissions September 15, 2003 letter will be resolved by ongoing efforts by the
District.
Regardless of these jurisdictional determinations, it is the Districts goal to protect the
environment and its inhabitants. The Construction Drawings include specifications
requiring the contractor to protect existing waterways, vegetation and wildlife from
unnecessary disruptions during construction. In addition, the District will file the
required Notice of Intent with the TCEQ and prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan prior to construction.
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 29
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
33/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 30
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
34/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
13 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
13.1 Itemized Construction and O&M Cost
Component
Construction
Costs
Design,
Contracting, and
Administation Total Cost
Reservoir Renovation Project 1,236,675$ 275,850$ 1,512,525$
Seepage Recovery Pilot Project 469,264$ 104,673$ 573,937$
Telemetry and Flow Measurement Project 510,180$ 113,800$ 623,980$
Canal Rehabilitation Project 3,605,355$ 804,203$ 4,409,558$
Total 5,821,474$ 1,298,526$ 7,120,000$
(2003 Price Base)
Item Description Number Unit Unit Cost Total Cost
Mobilization 1 EA 5,000$ 5,000$Clearing and Grubbing 17000 LF 0.75$ 12,750$Divert Water to West Lake 40 HR 75$ 3,000$Canal Embankment (Excav/Const) 450000 CY 1.50$ 675,000$Main Canal Check Structure 1 EA 225,000$ 225,000$"J"-Canal (Raymondville) Check Structure 1 EA 125,000$ 125,000$Pump House Diversion Structure 2 EA 7,500$ 15,000$Canal Diversion Structure 3 EA 10,000$ 30,000$Grade Control Surveying 160 HR 50$ 8,000$QC for Preparation 17000 LF 0.50$ 8,500$
QC for Concrete Work 17000 LF 0.50$ 8,500$QC for Pipeline Installation 17000 LF 0.50$ 8,500$
Subtotal 1,124,250$Contingency 112,425$
Total 1,236,675$
Delta Lake Irrigation District
Reservoir Renovation Project
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
(2003 Price Base)
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 31
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
35/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
Item Description Number Unit Unit Cost Total Cost
Mobilization 1 EA 5,000$ 5,000$Clearing and Grubbing 15840 LF 0.40$ 6,336$Field Engineering 1 EA 2,000$ 2,000$Traffic Control 1 EA 1,500$ 1,500$Location of Existing Utilities 1 EA 2,000$ 2,000$
Dewater Trench 15840 LF -$ -$Excavation 12000 CY 2.00$ 24,000$Gravel Bedding 12000 CY 7.00$ 84,000$24" PVC 5280 LF 22$ 116,160$18" PVC 7920 LF 15$ 118,800$12" PVC 2640 LF 12$ 31,680$Pump Station 1 EA 25,000$ 25,000$Grade Control Surveying 120 HR 25$ 3,000$QC for Preparation 15840 LF 0.15$ 2,376$QC for Concrete Work 15840 LF 0.15$ 2,376$QC for Pipeline Installation 15840 LF 0.15$ 2,376$
Subtotal 426,604$Contingency 42,660$
Total 469,264$
Delta Lake Irrigation District
Seepage Recovery Pilot Project
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE(2003 Price Base)
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 32
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
36/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
Item Description Number Unit Unit Cost Total Cost
Site Electrical Work 20 EA 1,500$ 30,000$Type I Flow Meter Enclosure 3 EA 1,500$ 4,500$
Type II Flow Meter Enclosure 4 EA 650$ 2,600$Concrete Flume 16 EA 4,000$ 64,000$Pipe Propeller Meter 7 EA 2,000$ 14,000$Run-Time Meter 4 EA 250$ 1,000$Doppler Meter 12 EA 6,500$ 78,000$
Depth Sensor 27 EA 2,000$ 54,000$Stilling Well 20 EA 1,000$ 20,000$Base Telemetry System and Software 1 LS 18,000$ 18,000$Remote Telemetry System Hardware 20 EA 2,300$ 46,000$Antenna, Mount, Cable 20 EA 250$ 5,000$Solar Panel 16 EA 100$ 1,600$
Vandal Box/Welding 14 EA 650$ 9,100$Algorithm Development 0 LS -$ -$Assembly and Testing 20 EA 1,250$ 25,000$Installation and Setup 20 EA 1,800$ 36,000$Calibration and Inspection 20 EA 1,500$ 30,000$Training and Programming 1 LS 25,000$ 25,000$
Subtotal 463,800$
Contingency 46,380$
Total 510,180$
Delta Lake Irrigation District
Telemetry and Flow Measurement Sites Project
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE(2003 Price Base)
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 33
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
37/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
Item Description Number Unit Unit Cost Total Cost
Mobilization 1 EA 5,000$ 5,000$Clearing and Grubbing 17800 LF 0.50$ 8,900$Field Engineering 1 EA 2,000$ 2,000$Traffic Control 1 EA 1,500$ 1,500$Location of Existing Utilities 1 EA 2,000$ 2,000$
Canal Regrading 16650 LF 2.50$ 41,625$42" RCP 5000 LF 50$ 250,000$36" RCP 5000 LF 40$ 200,000$24" PVC 3900 LF 25$ 97,500$18" PVC 3900 LF 20$ 78,000$
12" PVC 500 LF 15$ 7,500$Pipeline Inlet Boxes 1 EA 2,000$ 2,000$Turnout Connection Boxes 15 EA 1,500$ 22,500$Standpipe Connection Boxes 5 EA 3,000$ 15,000$Line Gates 15 EA 750$ 11,250$Pump House Retrofit 1 LS 25,000$ 25,000$QC for Preparation 17800 LF 0.25$ 4,450$QC for Concrete Work 17800 LF 0.25$ 4,450$QC for Pipeline Installation 17800 LF 0.25$ 4,450$
Subtotal 783,125$Contingency 78,313$
Total 861,438$
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE (TASK A)(2003 Price Base)
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 34
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
38/43
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
39/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
Item Description Number Unit Unit Cost Total Cost
Canal Maintenance 3.4 MI 300$ 1,020$Vegetation Control 3.4 MI 1,000$ 3,400$Debris Removal 3.4 MI 500$ 1,700$Bypass Canal Diversion Structure 1 EA 2,000$ 2,000$"J" Canal Diversion Structure 1 EA 1,500$ 1,500$Small Diversion Structures 1 EA 500$ 500$
Total 10,120$
Pipeline Repair 3 MI 50$ 150$Pump Station Maintenance 1 EA 500$ 500$
Total 650$
Technical Staff Routine Maintenance 20 EA 800$ 16,000$Calibration/Certification/Assistance 20 EA 250$ 5,000$Software Updates 0.2 EA 2,500$ 500$Hardware Repairs
RTU/Remote Telemetry System 1 EA 1,500$ 1,500$Pressure Transmitters 2 EA 650$ 1,300$Flow Meters (parts) 23 EA 50$ 1,150$Vandalism (misc.) 4 EA 200$ 800$Solar Panels (vandals) 4 EA 500$ 2,000$Wiring 2 EA 500$ 1,000$
Staff Gages 2 EA 35$ 70$Stilling Wells 1 EA 50$ 50$
Concrete Structure Repair 1 EA 500$ 500$Miscellaneous 2 EA 1,000$ 2,000$Frequency License Maintenance 0.3 EA 1,000$ 300$
Total 32,170$
Pipeline Repair 16.8 MI 200$ 3,360$
Total 3,360$
Total Annual Operations and Maintenance Cost 46,300$
Telemetry and Flow Measurement Sites Project
Canal Rehabilitation Project
Delta Lake Irrigation District
Water Conservation Improvements Project
ANNUAL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COST ESTIMATE
Reservoir Renovation Project
Seepage Recovery Pilot Project
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 36
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
40/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District
13.2 Construction Schedule
Axiom-Blair Engineering
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
41/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
13.3 Regulatory Compliance Documentation
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 38
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
42/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORTDelta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT
Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 39Axiom-Blair Engineering Page 39
8/2/2019 Dlid Proj Rpt
43/43
Delta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORTDelta Lake Irrigation District PROJECT REPORT