Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Priority Areas
Significantly Exceeds
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Meets Few
Expectations
Fails to Meet
Expectations
Overall Score
District Information
Race/Ethnicity
Student Groups
Enrollment 76,583
American Indian or Alaskan Native 0.6%Asian 6.8%Black or African American 52.8%Hispanic/Latino 26.1%
White 11.4%
Students with Disabilities 20.1%
Limited English Proficient 10.2%Economically Disadvantaged 81.7%
58.8/10016.4/25
16.7/25
25.7/50
68.0/10026.4/40
35.1/40
3.8/10
2.7/10
Goal not met: -5
61.3/10032.1/50
29.2/50
35.2/10019.7/50
15.5/50
Student Achievement
District Growth
Closing Gaps
On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness
English Language Arts (ELA) Achievement
Mathematics Achievement
English Language Arts (ELA) Growth
Mathematics Growth
English Language Arts (ELA) Achievement Gaps
Mathematics Achievement Gaps
Graduation Rate Gaps
Graduation Rate
Attendance Rate
3rd Grade English Language Arts (ELA) Achievement
8th Grade Mathematics Achievement
Absenteeism Rate (goal <13%)
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
1
Grades K3-12
Wisconsin Student Assessment System Percent Proficient and Advanced
56.0
Overall Accountability Ratings Score
Goal met: no deductionDropout Rate (goal <6%)
61.7/10017.3/25
16.8/25
27.6/50
86.5/10036.4/40
37.1/40
7.0/10
6.0/10
66.0/10033.0/50
33.0/50
66.7/10034.3/50
32.4/50
★★★★★
★★★★☆
★★★☆☆
★★☆☆☆
★☆☆☆☆
Max Score
District Score
20.4%
43.6%
15.1%
41.3%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
District: ELA State: ELA
Milwaukee
District Report Card | 2016-17 | Summary
District: Mathematics State: Mathematics
Total Deductions: -5Student Engagement Indicators
^Note: Outlier score fluctuation is noted by ^ when any school or district report card has a 10-point or greater change (up or down) in both Overall Score and Growth Score. This amount of change may or may not be reflective of actual school/district performance. DPI encourages review of other priority area scores in the detailed report card for a better understanding of school performance. Details:
83-100
73-82.9
63-72.9
53-62.9
0-52.9
http://dpi.wi.gov/accountability/report-cards
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
Includes Forward Exam (grades 3-8), ACT (grade 11), and Dynamic Learning Maps (grades 3-8 and 11)
State proficiency is for all tested grades: 3-8 and 11
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
2016-17
Max Score
State Score
Meets Few Expectations
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Within District Mobility 4.6%Between District Mobility 5.7%
November 21st, 2017
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov
District Report Card | 2016-17 | Notes
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
Page
2
• The data presented in this report card are for public and state accountability purposes. • Student performance on the Wisconsin Student Assessment System (WSAS) is the foundation of report cards. WSAS data include Forward Exam, ACT and Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM) in 2015-16 and 2016-17; Badger Exam, ACT and DLM in 2014-15; and Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts (WKCE) and Wisconsin Alternate Assessment - Students with Disabilities (WAA-SwD) in 2013-14 and before.• Some supplemental data that are not used in accountability calculations are presented in this report card for informational purposes in order to provide context. Additional data on student performance are available here: .• To protect student privacy, data for groups of fewer than 20 students are replaced by asterisks on public report cards. • "NA" is used when data are Not Applicable, e.g., a district that does not graduate students will have NA listed for graduation results.• The calculations used in this report card are described in the Technical Guide and Interpretive Guide:• State comparison scores shown on page one are shown for context only. They are not used to determine this district's score or rating.
http://dpi.wi.gov/wisedash
http://dpi.wi.gov/accountability/report-cards
• measures the level of knowledge and skills among students in the district, compared to state and national standards. It includes a composite of English language arts (ELA) and mathematics performance by the “all students” group in the Wisconsin Student Assessment System (WSAS) for all tested grades in the district.• describes how much student knowledge of ELA and mathematics in the district changes from year to year. It uses a value-added score that compares the change in a student's scores to those of observationally similar students.
• provides a measure that reflects the statewide goal of having all students improve, while narrowing the achievement and graduation gaps between groups of students. This measure acknowledges districts that raise the performance of traditionally lagging student groups, contributing to the closure of statewide gaps.• indicates the success of students in the district in achieving educational milestones that predict postsecondary success. It includes the graduation rate and the attendance rate as applicable to the district. It also includes measures of third-grade ELA and eighth- grade mathematics achievement as applicable to the district.
Student Engagement Indicators are measures outside the four Priority Areas that affect student success or the soundness of the report card. Each indicator has a goal, and districts that fail to meet that goal receive a point deduction from their Overall Accountability Score. Goals were set by looking at statewide data and establishing thresholds that identify districts contributing the most to lowering Wisconsin’s overall performance in the areas below. Note that Test Participation is no longer a Student Engagement Indicator, so there is no longer a deduction when this rate falls below 95 percent. Test participation among subgroups is still reported on the Student Engagement Indicators page for informational purposes only and is not used in district scoring on the 2016-17 report cards. • This indicator describes the proportion of students in the district who attend school less than 84.1% of the time. If the absenteeism rate in the district is 13% or more, five points are deducted. The absenteeism rate is different from the attendance rate because it measures students who are absent from school a certain amount of time, not how often students are present in school.• The goal for all districts is to have a dropout rate of less than 6%. A district not meeting the goal has five points deducted from its score. Note that dropout rate is not the opposite of graduation rate. A dropout rate includes any student who leaves school in grades 7-12 without expecting to earn a high school diploma, while a graduation rate counts students who earn a high school diploma within a certain time (four or six years) after starting ninth grade.
Priority Areas
About the Data
Student Engagement Indicators
Student Achievement
District Growth
Closing Gaps
On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness
Absenteeism Rate:
Dropout Rate:
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Rating Category Descriptions
• District greatly exceeds state expectations for student achievement, student growth, educational equity, and preparing students for educational milestones, including college and career readiness.• District exceeds state expectations for student achievement, student growth, educational equity, and preparing students for educational milestones, including college and career readiness.• District is meeting some state expectations for student achievement, student growth, educational equity, and preparing students for educational milestones, including college and career readiness.• District is meeting few state expectations for student achievement, student growth, educational equity, and preparing students for educational milestones, including college and career readiness.• District is failing to meet state expectations for student achievement, student growth, educational equity, and preparing students for educational milestones, including college and career readiness. Fails to Meet Expectations:
Meets Few Expectations:
Meets Expectations:
Exceeds Expectations:
Significantly Exceeds Expectations:
.
Milwaukee
School Performance Supplemental Data
Summary of Overall Accountability Ratings for Schools in the District
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
3
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | School Performance
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
Summary of Priority Area Scores for Schools in the District
Summary of Student Engagement Indicator Deductions for Schools in the District
Does not include Alternate Accountability schools
Significantly Exceeds Expectations
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Meets Few Expectations
Fails to Meet Expectations
Alternate Accountability - Satisfactory Progress
Rating Category Number of Schools Percent of Schools
Priority Area
Overall Accountability
Student Achievement
School Growth
Closing Gaps
On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness
Low Score Average Score High Score Maximum Score
Number of Deductions Number of Schools Percent of Schools
School performance is provided for informational purposes only and is not used to determine district accountability scores. The performance of all students in the district, including those in alternate accountability schools, is combined to determine the district accountability score and rating.
Zero
One
Two
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Milwaukee
4
25
29
34
46
9
2.5%
15.9%
18.5%
21.7%
29.3%
5.7%
22.0 59.5 97.9
7.0 32.9 94.7
16.6 59.6 100.0
32.4 66.1 100.0
36.4 77.4 95.1
100
100
100
100
100
64
65
9
46.4%
47.1%
6.5%
Does not include Alternate Accountability schools
Alternate Accountability - Needs Improvement 10 6.4%
Alternate Accountability - No Score 0 0.0%
Student Achievement
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
4
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | Student Achievement
The purpose of this Priority Area is to indicate how the level of knowledge and skills for students in the district compares against state and national standards.
What is the purpose of this Priority Area?
This measure is a composite of ELA and mathematics performance-level profiles for the "all students" group in the Wisconsin Student Assessment System (WSAS) for all tested grades. The score is based on how a district's students are distributed across the four WSAS performance levels, and it takes three years worth of test data into account.
What is being measured?
Beyond a district-wide score for Student Achievement, the report card shows the distribution of students across the four WSAS performance levels for the most recent three years.
Readers can use these data to compare this district against the state average and to see if the data reveal any short-term trends. Districts can use this information to help develop overall achievement goals to guide improvement efforts.
These data are also broken out by groups of students. Readers can evaluate the impact of group performance on overall district performance. They can identify particular groups of students who are having trouble or doing well.
What can the report card data tell us?
The data used to calculate a Priority Area score can be found on the following pages. Some supplemental data are also included to provide context. The accompanying Technical Guide explains how to calculate accountability scores, including worksheets that allow users to calculate these scores. See: .
What goes into the calculation of the Priority Area score?
http://dpi.wi.gov/accountability/report-cards
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
The Student Achievement score is based on the "all students" group, not student subgroups.
Is the Priority Area score calculated for all students, for subgroups, or both?
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Milwaukee
Student Achievement Total Score: 35.2/100
Performance Level
English Language Arts Achievement Score: 19.7/50
Advanced
Points Multiplier
Students
Points
2009-10
Students Students
Proficient
Basic
Below Basic
Total Tested
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-
2,300
6,308
8,301
15,577
32,486
3,450
6,308
4,150.5
0
13,908.5
915
5,557
10,646
15,194
32,312
1,372.5
5,557
5,323
0
12,252.5
1,092
5,844
11,168
15,880
33,984
1,638
5,844
5,584
0
13,066
• Details on student achievement calculations can be found at .• Student Achievement is based on Wisconsin Student Assessment System (WSAS) results for full academic year (FAY) students in all tested grades in the district.• Scores are based on student performance on WSAS mathematics and English language arts statewide assessments.• Points displayed in the tables above are weighted so that larger numbers of students and more recent years contribute more to the score for the Priority Area.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
5
7.1%
19.4%
25.6%
47.9%
100.0%
2.8%
17.2%
32.9%
47.0%
100.0%
3.2%
17.2%
32.9%
46.7%
100.0%
Count Percent PointsCount Percent PointsCount Percent
Performance Level
Mathematics Achievement Score: 15.5/50
Advanced
Points Multiplier
Students
Points
Students Students
Proficient
Basic
Below Basic
Total Tested
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-
1,471
3,767
8,699
18,231
32,168
2,206.5
3,767
4,349.5
0
10,323
471
4,268
9,568
18,180
32,487
706.5
4,268
4,784
0
9,758.5
523
4,624
10,145
18,775
34,067
784.5
4,624
5,072.5
0
10,481
4.6%
11.7%
27.0%
56.7%
100.0%
1.4%
13.1%
29.5%
56.0%
100.0%
1.5%
13.6%
29.8%
55.1%
100.0%
Count Percent PointsCount Percent PointsCount Percent
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | Student Achievement
Notes
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
http://dpi.wi.gov/accountability/report-cards
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
2016-17
2016-17
2015-16
2015-16
2014-15
2014-15
Milwaukee
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | Student Achievement
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
6
Student Achievement
American Indian or Alaskan Native
Asian
Black or African American
Hispanic/Latino
White
249
2,057
17,326
8,468
4,255
6.4%
10.5%
3.0%
7.1%
21.9%
24.9%
27.8%
14.3%
22.2%
30.1%
Group performance is provided for informational purposes only and is not used to determine the Student Achievement scores used in the accountability system.
Group
Students with Disabilities 6,548 2.3% 7.9%
Economically Disadvantaged 19,777 4.4% 16.2%
Limited English Proficient 4,189 2.8% 14.6%
27.7%
27.2%
24.4%
29.2%
22.0%
41.0%
34.5%
58.3%
41.6%
26.1%
14.4% 75.4%
26.5% 53.0%
27.8% 54.8%
244
2,129
16,792
8,760
4,116
3.3%
4.4%
0.9%
2.6%
10.5%
19.7%
25.3%
10.6%
19.4%
34.7%
6,623 0.7% 5.7%
25,170 1.5% 13.4%
4,289 0.7% 9.8%
English Language Arts Supplemental Data
All Students: State 403,679 19.5% 33.2% 24.8% 22.4% 409,988 9.0% 34.7%
Supplemental Data
33.6%
37.1%
30.3%
37.4%
31.5%
43.4%
33.3%
58.2%
40.6%
23.3%
16.3% 77.3%
32.6% 52.5%
35.3% 54.2%
216
2,372
17,650
9,228
3,893
3.2%
5.2%
1.4%
2.8%
11.0%
19.4%
25.2%
10.8%
19.4%
35.1%
7,111 0.9% 5.5%
27,933 1.9% 13.9%
4,342 0.6% 10.6%
30.6%
36.4%
29.8%
38.3%
31.1%
46.8%
33.2%
57.9%
39.6%
22.8%
17.6% 76.0%
32.9% 51.4%
34.1% 54.7%
34.7% 21.6% 415,182 9.9% 35.0% 34.2% 20.9%
Total
Teste
d
Pe
rcen
t
Ad
vance
d
Pe
rcen
t
Pro
ficien
t
Pe
rcen
t
Basic
Pe
rcen
t
Be
low
Basic
Total
Teste
d
Pe
rcen
t
Ad
vance
d
Pe
rcen
t
Pro
ficien
t
Pe
rcen
t
Basic
Pe
rcen
t
Be
low
Basic
Total
Teste
d
Pe
rcen
t
Ad
vance
d
Pe
rcen
t
Pro
ficien
t
Pe
rcen
t
Basic
Pe
rcen
t
Be
low
Basic
All Students: District 32,486 7.1% 19.4% 25.6% 47.9% 32,312 2.8% 17.2% 32.9% 47.0% 33,984 3.2% 17.2% 32.9% 46.7%
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
2016-172015-162014-15
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
****<20****<20****<20
38.3%36.6%21.5%3.6%60632.1%42.1%21.8%4.1%27126.4%27.2%34.4%12.0%125Two or More Races
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
Milwaukee
American Indian or Alaskan Native
Asian
Black or African American
Hispanic/Latino
White
245
2,067
17,151
8,340
4,238
7.3%
10.2%
1.5%
4.6%
13.9%
13.5%
18.6%
6.7%
14.2%
23.2%
Group
Students with Disabilities 6,446 1.8% 4.9%
Economically Disadvantaged 19,555 2.9% 9.8%
Limited English Proficient 4,184 2.7% 10.0%
28.2%
32.9%
22.9%
32.0%
30.9%
51.0%
38.3%
68.9%
49.1%
32.0%
13.7% 79.7%
25.3% 62.0%
29.2% 58.1%
244
2,168
16,854
8,823
4,128
1.6%
2.5%
0.5%
1.0%
5.7%
18.4%
22.8%
6.7%
15.1%
29.7%
6,694 0.8% 3.3%
25,317 0.8% 10.1%
4,402 0.7% 10.0%
Mathematics Supplemental Data
All Students: State 403,399 18.8% 26.0% 29.5% 25.7% 410,782 8.3% 34.3%
29.1%
37.8%
24.5%
34.3%
34.2%
50.8%
36.9%
68.3%
49.6%
30.4%
13.8% 82.1%
28.3% 60.7%
31.6% 57.7%
215
2,411
17,637
9,275
3,903
2.3%
2.0%
0.7%
1.1%
5.8%
14.9%
21.9%
7.5%
15.3%
31.3%
7,111 0.7% 4.1%
28,010 0.8% 10.9%
4,458 0.6% 10.0%
32.6%
36.1%
24.8%
35.6%
34.1%
50.2%
39.9%
67.0%
47.9%
28.7%
14.8% 80.4%
29.0% 59.3%
30.6% 58.8%
32.7% 24.7% 415,448 8.5% 34.4% 32.4% 24.7%
Total
Teste
d
Pe
rcen
t
Ad
vance
d
Pe
rcen
t
Pro
ficien
t
Pe
rcen
t
Basic
Pe
rcen
t
Be
low
Basic
Total
Teste
d
Pe
rcen
t
Ad
vance
d
Pe
rcen
t
Pro
ficien
t
Pe
rcen
t
Basic
Pe
rcen
t
Be
low
Basic
Total
Teste
d
Pe
rcen
t
Ad
vance
d
Pe
rcen
t
Pro
ficien
t
Pe
rcen
t
Basic
Pe
rcen
t
Be
low
Basic
All Students: District 32,168 4.6% 11.7% 27.0% 56.7% 32,487 1.4% 13.1% 29.5% 56.0% 34,067 1.5% 13.6% 29.8% 55.1%
2016-172015-162014-15
Two or More Races 121 6.6% 18.2% 38.8% 36.4% 270 3.7% 14.1% 38.5% 43.7% 607 2.5% 15.2% 31.1% 51.2%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
<20 * * * * <20 * * * * <20 * * * *
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
7
District Growth
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | District Growth
The purpose of this Priority Area is to give districts a measure that summarizes how rapidly their students are gaining knowledge and skills from year to year. In contrast to Student Achievement, which is based on the levels of proficiency students have attained, District Growth focuses on the pace of improvement in students’ performance.
What is the purpose of this Priority Area?
This measure describes how much student knowledge of English language arts and mathematics in the district changes from year to year. It uses a value-added score that compares the change in a student's scores to those of observationally similar students.
What is being measured?
Measuring growth is an important complement to student achievement when assessing district performance. How well students are learning is reflected both by their level of attainment and by their rate of improvement. In some cases, a district's performance in Student Achievement could be quite different than its performance in District Growth.
The report card also provides District Growth data for groups of students. Readers can determine the impact of groups’ growth performance on overall district growth performance. They can identify particular groups of students that are having trouble improving or that are improving rapidly.
What can the data tell us?
The data used to calculate a Priority Area score can be found on the following page. Some supplemental data are also included to provide context. The accompanying Technical Guide explains how to calculate accountability scores, including worksheets that allow users to calculate these scores. See .
What goes into the calculation of the Priority Area score?
http://dpi.wi.gov/accountability/report-cards
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
The District Growth score is based on the "all students" group, not student subgroups.
Is the Priority Area score calculated for all students, for student groups, or both?
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Milwaukee
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
8
District Growth Total Score: 61.3/100
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | District Growth
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
District Growth Supplemental DataGroup performance is provided for informational purposes only and is not used to determine the District Growth scores used in the accountability system. Supplemental value-added scores are calculated when 10 or more students are included in a group.
Asian
Black or African American
Hispanic/Latino
White
Students with Disabilities
Economically Disadvantaged
Limited English Proficient
All Students: State
American Indian or Alaskan Native
Group
English Language Arts
Count
Mathematics
11,837
6,439
2,662
2.5
3.1
3.4
292,662
158
1,508
292,617
157
1,508
11,821
6,434
2,662
4,348
3.0
2.9
3.7
18,906
2,198
4,352
18,928
2,198
2.4
2.8
2.8
3.0
2.8
2.9
2.4
2.8
2.9
2.6
2.6
2.6
Value-Added Score Count
Value-Added Score
Two or More Races 392 2.8 392 2.6
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander <20 * <20 *
Notes
Mathematics Growth Score: 29.2/50English Language Arts Growth Score: 32.1/50
All Students: District
Group
English Language Arts
Count
Mathematics
23,007 22,9852.9 2.6
Value-Added Score Count
Value-Added Score
• Details on district growth calculations can be found at .http://dpi.wi.gov/accountability/report-cards
These growth scores are derived from a value-added model. A value-added model measures a student’s performance on standardized assessments over a period of time. It then compares the change in the student’s scores to those of observationally similar students. If the student grew more than predicted by these peers’ performance, we say her district had high value added. That is, the value the district added to the student’s growth was higher than predicted.
Milwaukee
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
9
Closing Gaps
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | Closing Gaps
The purpose of this Priority Area is to provide a measure that reflects the statewide goal of having all students improve, while narrowing the achievement and graduation gaps between groups of students. This measure acknowledges districts that raise the performance of traditionally lagging student groups, contributing to the closure of statewide gaps.
What is the purpose of this Priority Area?
The growth in the proficiency rate of economically disadvantaged students, English language learners, and students with disabilities is compared against the growth in the state rate for each traditionally higher scoring comparison group. A supergroup is a group of 20 or more students that is comprised of at least two of the three target groups when those groups alone have fewer than 20 students. Supergroups allow more districts with small group sizes to be included in the accountability system. American Indian or Alaskan Native students, Asian students, Black or African American students, Hispanic/Latino students, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander students and two or more race students are compared to White students statewide.
What is being measured?
This Priority Area shows whether the district is succeeding in helping lagging groups catch up. Closing Gaps scores can help explain whether factors affecting improved teaching and learning are affecting all groups equally.
What can the data tell us?
The data used to calculate a Priority Area score can be found on the following pages. The accompanying Technical Guide explains how to calculate accountability scores, including worksheets that allow users to calculate these scores. See: .
What goes into the calculation of the Priority Area score?
http://dpi.wi.gov/accountability/report-cards
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
The Closing Gaps score is based on student subgroups, not the "all students" group.
Is the Priority Area score calculated for all students, for student groups, or both?
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The above is an example of the type of tables that are shown for this district on the next page. Districts are awarded points for raising test scores and/or graduation rates of target groups.
The chart to the right demonstrates how groups are compared. There is a trend line for both groups, measuring the rate of change in points-based proficiency using an equal number of years of data.
If the target group’s line (circles) is steeper than the comparison group’s line, then the difference in rate of change (the rightmost column in the table) is larger. A large, positive difference in rate of change numbers indicates progress in closing gaps, resulting in a higher Closing Gaps score.
0.452 0.6780.480 0.5930.351 0.0500.201
Group
District Target Group Points-Based Proficiency Rates State Comparison Group Points-Based Proficiency Rates Rate of Change
Example District Target Group
Group
Example State Comparison Group 0.1510.8110.793 0.825
Diffe
ren
ce in
Rate
of C
ha
nge
20
14
-15
Po
ints
20
13
-14
Po
ints
20
12
-13
Po
ints
20
16
-17
Po
ints
20
15
-16
Po
ints
20
14
-15
Po
ints
20
13
-14
Po
ints
20
12
-13
Po
ints
State C
om
pariso
n
Gro
up
District Ta
rget
Gro
up
0.843
20
15
-16
Po
ints
0.846
20
16
-17
Po
ints
Example
2016-172015-162014-152013-142012-13
District Target Group: Points-Based Proficiency Score
State Comparison Group: Points-Based Proficiency Score
District Target Group Trend Line
State Comparison Group Trend Line
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Po
int-B
ased
Pro
ficiency R
ate
•
•• •
••
Milwaukee
Closing Gaps
Asian
Black or African American
Hispanic/Latino
Students with Disabilities
Economically Disadvantaged
Limited English Proficient
0.414
0.504
0.271
0.420
0.149
0.320
0.285
Total Score: 58.8/100Closing Achievement Gaps - English Language Arts | Score: 16.4/25
0.512
0.279
0.427
0.156
0.331
0.285
Students without Disabilities
Not Economically Disadvantaged
English Proficient
0.396
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
10
0.402
0.390
0.249
0.338
0.177
0.279
0.226
0.571
0.310
0.474
0.185
0.359
0.327
0.4840.422
0.378
0.262
0.331
0.183
0.282
0.225
0.023
0.021
0.022
0.018
0.036
0.006
0.027
-0.008
0.014
0.018
-0.003
Group
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | Closing Gaps
“All 3” Supergroup
“SwD-ECD” Supergroup
“SwD-LEP” Supergroup
“ECD-LEP” Supergroup
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Not in “All 3” Supergroup
Not in “SwD-ECD” Supergroup
Not in “SwD-LEP” Supergroup
Not in “ECD-LEP” Supergroup
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
• Details on closing gaps calculations can be found at .• See notes on page 12 for further details about Closing Gaps.
District Target Group Points-Based Proficiency Rates State Comparison Group Points-Based Proficiency Rates
American Indian or Alaskan Native
Noteshttp://dpi.wi.gov/accountability/report-cards
White
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
-0.026
0.013
-0.017
0.004
-0.029
-0.008
0.000
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.658
0.634
0.710
0.609
0.634
0.705
0.610
0.657
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.826
0.801
0.877
0.767
NA
NA
NA
NA
Diffe
ren
ce in
Rate
of C
ha
nge
20
14
-15
Po
ints
20
13
-14
Po
ints
20
12
-13
Po
ints
20
16
-17
Po
ints
20
15
-16
Po
ints
20
14
-15
Po
ints
20
13
-14
Po
ints
20
12
-13
Po
ints
State C
om
pariso
n
Gro
up
District Ta
rget
Gro
up
0.723
0.693
0.769
0.662
NA
NA
NA
NA
20
15
-16
Po
ints
0.741
0.709
0.785
0.675
NA
NA
NA
NA
20
16
-17
Po
ints
Rate of Change
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander NANA NANA
Two or More Races 0.489NA 0.660NA
NA
-0.087
NA
0.452
NA
-0.044
Group
Milwaukee
0.0230.6580.657 0.826 0.723 0.741
0.0230.6580.657 0.826 0.723 0.741
NANANA NA NA NA
-0.043NANA 0.826 0.723 0.741
0.0230.6580.657 0.826 0.723 0.741
Asian
Black or African American
Hispanic/Latino
Students with Disabilities
Economically Disadvantaged
Limited English Proficient
0.355
0.455
0.197
0.338
0.114
0.255
0.269
Closing Achievement Gaps - Mathematics | Score: 16.7/25
0.430
0.209
0.348
0.125
0.266
0.262
Students without Disabilities
Not Economically Disadvantaged
English Proficient
0.3470.506
0.559
0.294
0.461
0.237
0.360
0.397
0.503
0.204
0.372
0.143
0.268
0.287
0.3860.481
0.573
0.313
0.455
0.257
0.370
0.406
-0.026
-0.030
-0.028
-0.031
-0.039
-0.030
-0.033
-0.039
-0.031
-0.041
-0.042
Group
“All 3” Supergroup
“SwD-ECD” Supergroup
“SwD-LEP” Supergroup
“ECD-LEP” Supergroup
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Not in “All 3” Supergroup
Not in “SwD-ECD” Supergroup
Not in “SwD-LEP” Supergroup
Not in “ECD-LEP” Supergroup
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
District Target Group Points-Based Proficiency Rates State Comparison Group Points-Based Proficiency Rates Rate of Change
American Indian or Alaskan Native
White
-0.016
-0.013
-0.004
-0.007
-0.009
-0.003
-0.010
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.797
0.768
0.851
0.737
0.767
0.844
0.736
0.793
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.772
0.735
0.823
0.705
NA
NA
NA
NA
Diffe
ren
ce in
Rate
of C
han
ge
20
14
-15
Po
ints
20
13
-14
Po
ints
20
12
-13
Po
ints
20
16
-17
Po
ints
20
15
-16
Po
ints
20
14
-15
Po
ints
20
13
-14
Po
ints
20
12
-13
Po
ints
State C
om
pariso
n
Gro
up
District T
arge
t
Gro
up
0.705
0.663
0.749
0.633
NA
NA
NA
NA
20
15
-16
Po
ints
0.711
0.668
0.753
0.635
NA
NA
NA
NA
20
16
-17
Po
ints
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander NA NANA NANA NA NA
Two or More Races 0.389 0.344NA 0.475NA -0.060 -0.029
Group
NANANA NA NA NA
-0.031NANA 0.772 0.705 0.711
-0.0260.7970.793 0.772 0.705 0.711
-0.0260.7970.793 0.772 0.705 0.711
-0.0260.7970.793 0.772 0.705 0.711
Closing Gaps
Asian
Black or African American
Hispanic/Latino
Students with Disabilities
Economically Disadvantaged
Limited English Proficient
0.432
0.790
0.559
0.594
0.366
0.572
0.501
Total Score: 58.8/100
Closing Graduation Gaps - Four Year | Score: 13.1/25
0.811
0.564
0.630
0.314
0.574
0.544
Students without Disabilities
Not Economically Disadvantaged
English Proficient
0.526
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
11
0.429
0.770
0.590
0.569
0.157
0.595
0.529
0.799
0.585
0.591
0.370
0.588
0.534
0.6560.594
0.783
0.621
0.639
0.456
0.617
0.569
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.007
-0.015
0.001
-0.015
-0.011
-0.008
-0.013
Group
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | Closing Gaps
“All 3” Supergroup
“SwD-ECD” Supergroup
“SwD-LEP” Supergroup
“ECD-LEP” Supergroup
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Not in “All 3” Supergroup
Not in “SwD-ECD” Supergroup
Not in “SwD-LEP” Supergroup
Not in “ECD-LEP” Supergroup
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
District Target Group Graduation Rates State Comparison Group Graduation Rates
American Indian or Alaskan Native
Notes
White
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
-0.015
0.005
-0.017
-0.001
-0.017
-0.013
-0.010
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.928
0.908
0.935
0.890
0.906
0.934
0.887
0.925
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.931
0.914
0.942
0.895
NA
NA
NA
NA
Diffe
ren
ce in
Rate
of C
ha
nge
20
13
-14
Gra
du
ation
Ra
te
20
12
-13
Gra
du
ation
Ra
te
20
11
-12
Gra
du
ation
Ra
te
20
15
-16
Gra
du
ation
Ra
te
20
14
-15
Gra
du
ation
Ra
te
20
13
-14
Gra
du
ation
Ra
te
20
12
-13
Gra
du
ation
Ra
te
20
11
-12
Gra
du
ation
Ra
te
State C
om
pariso
n
Gro
up
District Ta
rget
Gro
up
0.934
0.917
0.943
0.896
NA
NA
NA
NA
20
14
-15
Gra
du
ation
Ra
te
0.932
0.913
0.940
0.894
NA
NA
NA
NA
20
15
-16
Gra
du
ation
Ra
te
Rate of Change
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander NANA NANA
Two or More Races NANA NANA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Graduation Rate Gaps Score: 25.7/50
See notes on page 12 for further details on Closing Gaps.
Group
Milwaukee
NANANA NA NA NA
NANANA NA NA NA
0.0020.9280.925 0.931 0.934 0.932
0.0020.9280.925 0.931 0.934 0.932
0.0020.9280.925 0.931 0.934 0.932
Asian
Black or African American
Hispanic/Latino
Students with Disabilities
Economically Disadvantaged
Limited English Proficient
0.679
0.836
0.702
0.699
0.388
0.717
0.591
Closing Graduation Gaps - Six Year| Score: 12.6/25
0.857
0.694
0.682
0.564
0.703
0.508
Students without Disabilities
Not Economically Disadvantaged
English Proficient
0.7100.600
0.894
0.732
0.721
0.669
0.744
0.658
0.842
0.720
0.726
0.585
0.727
0.647
0.7240.639
0.843
0.757
0.727
0.632
0.758
0.668
0.004
0.003
0.005
0.004
-0.003
-0.016
-0.011
-0.035
-0.014
-0.038
0.024
Group
“All 3” Supergroup
“SwD-ECD” Supergroup
“SwD-LEP” Supergroup
“ECD-LEP” Supergroup
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Not in “All 3” Supergroup
Not in “SwD-ECD” Supergroup
Not in “SwD-LEP” Supergroup
Not in “ECD-LEP” Supergroup
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
District Target Group Graduation Rates State Comparison Group Graduation Rates Rate of Change
American Indian or Alaskan Native
White
0.020
-0.007
-0.020
-0.015
-0.038
-0.019
-0.042
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.949
0.932
0.948
0.924
0.928
0.941
0.917
0.944
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.951
0.933
0.954
0.925
NA
NA
NA
NA
Diffe
ren
ce in
Rate
of C
han
ge
20
13
-14
Grad
uatio
n R
ate
20
12
-13
Grad
uatio
n R
ate
20
11
-12
Grad
uatio
n R
ate
20
15
-16
Grad
uatio
n R
ate
20
14
-15
Grad
uatio
n R
ate
20
13
-14
Grad
uatio
n R
ate
20
12
-13
Grad
uatio
n R
ate
20
11
-12
Grad
uatio
n R
ate
State Co
mp
arison
Gro
up
District Target
Gro
up
0.956
0.939
0.960
0.931
NA
NA
NA
NA
20
14
-15
Grad
uatio
n R
ate
0.958
0.940
0.962
0.932
NA
NA
NA
NA
20
15
-16
Grad
uatio
n R
ate
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander NA NANA NANA NA NA
Two or More Races NA NANA NANA NA NA
Group
NANANA NA NA NA
NANANA NA NA NA
0.0040.9490.944 0.951 0.956 0.958
0.0040.9490.944 0.951 0.956 0.958
0.0040.9490.944 0.951 0.956 0.958
Closing Gaps Total Score: 58.8/100
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
12
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | Closing Gaps
• Details on Closing Gaps calculations can be found at .• Closing Graduation Gaps is based on graduation data from prior years because 2016-17 data are not yet available. For graduation calculations, 2015-16 data is the most current.• Points-based proficiency rate is calculated by multiplying the number of advanced students by 1.5, proficient students by 1.0, basic students by 0.5 and minimal performance students by 0.0.• Count of students for achievement calculations can be found in the Achievement Priority Area of the Report Card.• If the group’s average points-based proficiency rate or graduation rate is greater than or equal to 0.9, the rate of change is adjusted to be equal to the highest rate of change observed for that group at any district in the state. This will be indicated on the report card by the symbol “!”. This is to ensure that districts with very high achievement or graduation are not penalized with low Closing Gaps scores for small increases in gaps.• In 2015-16 two new race/ethnicity categories were added: "Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander" and "Two or More Races". Closing Achievement Gaps results for these categories will be calculated as data become available • Beginning on 2016-17 report cards, each subgroup included in Closing Gaps calculations is compared to its statewide comparison group using the same number of years of data. For example, if three years of data are available to determine the trend for the students with disabilities subgroup, three years of data are included in the statewide comparison group trend for students without disabilities.
About Supergroups
Notes - Prior Three Pages
Supergroups are a way to look at closing gaps among groups of students that would ordinarily be too small to include. A supergroup is made up of all the students that belong to any of the groups in the supergroup: • “All 3” Supergroup: students with disabilities, economically disadvantaged, and limited English proficient students. • “SwD-ECD” Supergroup: students with disabilities and economically disadvantaged students. • “SwD-LEP” Supergroup: students with disabilities and limited English proficient students. • “ECD-LEP” Supergroup: economically disadvantaged and limited English proficient students.A supergroup is used to evaluate Closing Gaps only when there are fewer than 20 students in each of the individual groups within the supergroup, but more than 20 students in the supergroup. For example, if a district had fewer than 20 students with disabilities and fewer than 20 economically disadvantaged students, but more than 20 students when those groups are combined, the “SwD-ECD” supergroup would be used to evaluate Closing Gaps. Students are not double-counted in a supergroup. In the example above, an economically disadvantaged student with a disability is only counted once in the supergroup.
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
http://dpi.wi.gov/accountability/report-cards
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Milwaukee
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
13
On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness
The purpose of this Priority Area is to give districts an indication of how successfully students are achieving educational milestones that predict postsecondary readiness for college and career.
What is the purpose of this Priority Area?
This Priority Area has two parts. The first part includes both graduation rate and attendance rate. The second includes third-grade English language arts achievement and eighth-grade mathematics achievement as applicable to the district. The scores for these two parts are added to produce the Priority Area score.
What is being measured?
Graduation rates measure a key education milestone. Attendance rate represents an important prerequisite for student learning.
Third-grade English language arts ability is linked to high school performance, graduation, and college enrollment for Wisconsin students. Eighth-grade mathematics ability predicts success in high school mathematics. These are important metrics for districts to monitor.
In the future, other indicators may be incorporated into this Priority Area as we find better ways to measure whether students are on the right trajectory for college and career readiness.
What can the data tell us?
The data used to calculate a Priority Area score can be found on the following pages. Some supplemental data are also included to provide context. The accompanying Technical Guide explains how to calculate accountability scores, including worksheets that allow users to calculate these scores. See: .
What goes into the calculation of the Priority Area score?
http://dpi.wi.gov/accountability/report-cards
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
The On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness score is based on the "all students" group for Graduation, Third-Grade English Language Arts Achievement, and Eighth-Grade Mathematics Achievement, and based on the average of the "all students" group and the student subgroup with the lowest rate for Attendance.
Is the Priority Area score calculated for all students, for student groups, or both?
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Milwaukee
On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness Total Score: 68.0/100
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
14
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness
Notes• Details on On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness calculations can be found at . • Due to data availability, Attendance and Graduation data are lagged by one year. For the 2016-17 report cards, On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness calculations use these data from the 2015-16 school year.
73,933 10,618,398.0 11,903,953.0 89.2%
Enrollment Attended Days Possible Days Rate
http://dpi.wi.gov/accountability/report-cards
All Students
Group
Six-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
Rate
Students in Cohort Graduates Rate
60.9% 5,062 3,594 71.0%
Four-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
Students in Cohort Graduates
5,213 3,173
All Students
Group
2015-16 Attendance Score: 35.1/40
2015-16 Graduation Score: 26.4/40
Group performance is provided for informational purposes only and is not used to determine the On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness scores used in the accountability system.
Asian
Black or African American
Hispanic/Latino
Students with Disabilities
Economically Disadvantaged
Limited English Proficient
American Indian or Alaskan Native
Group
Six-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
Rate
Students in Cohort Graduates Rate
52.6%
81.1%
56.4%
63.0%
31.4%
57.4%
54.4%
31
301
3,174
990
799
3,841
307
22
258
2,203
675
451
2,700
156
71.0%
85.7%
69.4%
68.2%
56.4%
70.3%
50.8%
White 72.6% 553 429 77.6%
Four-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
Students in Cohort Graduates
38
297
3,147
1,146
754
3,847
423
20
241
1,774
722
237
2,209
230
548 398
On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness Supplemental Data
13,337 1,912,849.5 2,215,511.5 86.3% Lowest Group: Students with Disabilities
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander * <20 * *<20 *
Two or More Races 48.6% <20 * *37 18
Milwaukee
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
15
On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness Total Score: 68.0/100
Notes
• Details on On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness calculations can be found at . • 3rd Grade English Language Arts and 8th Grade Mathematics Scores are determined in the same way as for the Student Achievement Priority Area. However, if there are fewer than 20 students in the most recent year, then the most recent two years of data are combined so that the cell size requirement is met.• Student achievement is based on Wisconsin Student Assessment System (WSAS) results for full academic year (FAY) students.• Points displayed in the tables above are weighted so that larger numbers of students and more recent years contribute more to the score for the Priority Area.
http://dpi.wi.gov/accountability/report-cards
Performance Level
2016-17 3rd Grade English Language Arts Achievement Score: 3.8/10
Advanced
Points Multiplier
Students
Points
Students Students
2011-12
Proficient
Basic
Below Basic
Total Tested
1.5
1
0.5
0
-
505
830
1,476
2,588
5,399
757.5
830
738
0
2,325.5
141
861
1,765
2,542
5,309
211.5
861
882.5
0
1,955
123
831
1,926
2,758
5,638
184.5
831
963
0
1,978.5
9.4%
15.4%
27.3%
47.9%
100%
2.7%
16.2%
33.2%
47.9%
100%
2.2%
14.7%
34.2%
48.9%
100%
Count Percent PointsCount Percent PointsCount Percent
Performance Level
2016-17 8th Grade Mathematics Achievement Score: 2.7/10
Advanced
Points Multiplier
Students
Points
Students Students
Proficient
Basic
Below Basic
Total Tested
1.5
1
0.5
0
-
212
414
1,246
2,567
4,439
318
414
623
0
1,355
46
428
1,330
2,639
4,443
69
428
665
0
1,162
53
443
1,358
2,731
4,585
79.5
443
679
0
1,201.5
4.8%
9.3%
28.1%
57.8%
100%
1.0%
9.6%
29.9%
59.4%
100%
1.2%
9.7%
29.6%
59.6%
100%
Count Percent PointsCount Percent PointsCount Percent
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
2016-17
2016-17
2015-16
2015-16
2014-15
2014-15
Milwaukee
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | dpi.wi.gov Page
16
Group performance for Test Participation Rates, Absenteeism Rates and Dropout Rates is provided below for informational purposes only and is not used to determine whether these goals have been met. Test Participation data reflect the one-year test participation rates of subgroups. Note that there is no longer a score deduction associated with Test Participation on the 2016-17 Report Cards.
District Report Card Detail | 2016-17 | Student Engagement Indicators
Student Engagement Indicators and Test Participation Data
Indicator Points DeductedGoal One-Year District Rate
Dropout Rate
Absenteeism Rate
0
-5
Less than 6%
Less than 13%
5.1%
20.7%
Student Engagement Indicators Goals Met: 1/2
Notes• Details on Student Engagement Indicator calculations can be found at . • All districts are expected to meet Student Engagement Indicator goals for Absenteeism and Dropouts rates. The overall accountability score is reduced by five points if the Absenteeism Rate goal or Dropout Rate goal is not met. • Absenteeism Rate is the percent of students who are chronically absent (absent at least 16% of the time).
http://dpi.wi.gov/accountability/report-cards
Report cards for different types of schools or districts should not be directly compared.
Three-Year District Rate
Both one-year and three-year rates are considered for Absenteeism and Dropout rates. If either the one-year or three-year rate meets the goal then no points are deducted. The three-year rate is based on two years of data when three years are not available.
20.5%
5.4%
FINAL - PUBLIC REPORT - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Milwaukee
Asian
Black or African American
Hispanic/Latino
Students with Disabilities
Economically Disadvantaged
American Indian or Alaskan Native
Group
White
Test Participation Rate
ELA
Rate
ELA
Stud
ents
Dropout RateAbsenteeism Rate
Stud
ents
Stud
ents
Rate
Rate
Limited English Proficient
One Year One YearThree Year Three Year
Math
ematics
Stud
ents
Stud
ents
Stud
ents
Rate
Rate
2,528 98.9% 2,528 99.1%
19,837 95.3% 19,838 95.2%
9,844 98.2% 9,844 98.1%
240 95.4% 240 94.6%
4,103 97.7% 4,103 97.7%
7,891 95.2% 7,891 95.1%
30,748 96.6% 30,748 96.5%
4,792 98.1% 4,792 98.4%
4,540 6.2% 12,960 6.6%
38,704 26.8% 119,313 26.1%
18,192 15.7% 53,358 15.6%
514 27.6% 1,542 26.8%
8,531 10.6% 26,994 11.3%
13,130 28.2% 43,346 29.0%
8,395 11.3% 25,602 11.5%
57,236 23.0% 174,178 22.2%
1,964 2.5% 5,656 2.3%
17,910 5.5% 55,801 6.1%
7,324 5.3% 21,414 5.2%
227 7.9% 700 5.0%
3,231 4.1% 10,357 3.7%
6,103 3.9% 20,541 5.6%
2,829 5.9% 9,001 5.4%
23,741 5.2% 73,929 5.3%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
24 95.8% 24 95.8%44 22.7% 80 20.0% <20 * NA NA
Two or More Races 689 97.2% 688 97.2%898 21.8% 1,687 20.2% 248 4.4% 407 4.2%
All Students: District 37,301 96.6% 37,301 96.5%71,423 20.7% 215,949 20.5% 30,912 5.1% 94,353 5.4%
Math
ematics
Rate
(Not Scored)