Upload
wilfrid-thompson
View
221
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DISTRICT NAME HERE
Using Student Growth Percentiles (Option A)
Warm Up
The median is the middle number in a sequence of numbers
On your table is a ½ sheet of paper that lists the heights of students in a teacher’s class
Write the students’ heights in order from shortest to tallest
Identify the median height and circle it
Norms
Share your expertiseEquity of voiceActive listeningRespect for all perspectivesSelf-monitor use of technologySafety and confidentiality
Connector
On an index card please complete the following sentence stem
“One of the most important learnings that I hope to take away today is…”
Give One, Get One!
Turn to a neighborIntroduce yourself to a colleague
(name & position)Share the information on your cardTurn the other direction and start
the process over againShare out
Outcomes for Today
Understand Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) and their relationship to Median Student Growth Percentiles (MSGPs)
Role of Student Growth Percentiles on goal setting and summative evaluation
ESEA Waiver Requirement
Teachers in tested grades and subjects (Grades 4-8 ELA/Math) and principals must use state assessments as one measure of student learning and growth (SLG) in their evaluation
Oregon educators set two SLG goals annually; Category 1 goals are measured by state assessment; Category 2 goals are measured by other assessments
Teachers in tested grades
and subjects & Principals
Category 1 SLG goal
Category 2 SLG goal
Teachers in non-tested grades and
subjects
Category 2 SLG goal
Category 2 SLG goal
ELA/MathGrades 4-8
ESEA Waiver Update
Oregon’s waiver approved for 3 years with conditions removed
All districts must use Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) to meet the state assessment requirement for SLG goals
For evaluation purposes statewide assessments will only be used as a measure of SLG goal attainment for those grades that have baseline data Tested grades and subjects are now ELA and
Math 4-8
Request to USED for 2015-16
ODE has requested a modification to the waiver Districts required to provide SGP
training to staff SGPs will not be incorporated into
educator summative evaluations for SY 2015-2016
For 2015-16 ODE recommends that all educators set two goals that use Category 2 measures
2016-17 AND BEYOND
Student Growth Percentiles
What is a Student Growth Percentile?
Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) measure growth for individual students by comparing the improvement in an individual student’s achievement on Smarter Balanced to that of his or her “academic peers” (i.e. those who have similar historical assessment results).
What is a Median Student Growth Percentile?
Median Student Growth Percentile (MSGP) represents the exact middle of the Student Growth Percentile scores for an educator’s students. In other words, half of the educator’s students performed above the median score and half of the students performed below.
Impact of Attendance
Districts must use the state’s definition of “full academic year” when including students on rosters“…consecutive enrollment in a school or district for more than one-half of the instructional days prior to the first school day in May”
Impact of Class Size on SGPs
Districts are required to use Median Student Growth Percentiles for educators who have at least 20 students
Teachers and principals in grades 4-8 (ELA and math only) who fall below 20 students must use other measures that are valid, reliable, and comparable across the school or district (Category 2 measures)
Eventually student SGPs will be pooled across years to create rosters and MSGPs for all educators
Student Growth Percentiles
(SGPs)
Normative growth measure
One year of growth
Growth is relative to students with a similar score history
What do we mean by normative growth?
35%
65%
Percentiles
35th
3rd Grade
2262
Level 1
4th Grade
2398
Level 2
Anthony
2398- 2262
136 points
Anthony’s Comparison Group
21
All 3rd grade test takers in Oregon
Anthony
…with Anthony’s Prior Score ~2262
Level 1
Level 2 Level 3
Level 4
Level 1
Level 2 Level 3
Level 4
Anthony’s Comparison Group
High score
Middle score
4th Grade Score Distribution
Anthony’s prior score ~2262
Level 1
Level 2 Level 3
Level 4
Anthony’s Comparison Group
4th Grade Score Distribution
80% of students in Anthony’s comparison group scored below him 2398
Level 1
Level 2 Level 3
Level 4SGP = 80
Anthony’s Comparison Group
4th Grade Score Distribution
Median Student Growth Percentiles
Students in Mr. Waters’ class
Student SGPSheryl 3Hector 22Robert 36Miranda 38Tre 51Anna 54Eric 71Anthony 80Amina 93
Making a Determination of Student Growth
Category 1 SLG Rating
1 2 3 4
Median SGP Criteria
1 to 34percentil
e
35 to 49percentile
50 to 64percentile
65 to 99percentile
Interpretation
Low growth
Below average growth
Above average growth
High growth
The Median Student Growth Percentile (SGP) determines the educator’s Category 1 SLG Rating
X-Axis = SLG Rating
• SLG performance level based on two goals
• Two-year cycle select two of four goals
• Score SLG goals• Get a rating between 1 and 4;• Use X-Axis thresholds to
determine SLG level: 4 = both goals 4s 3 = both goals 3s; one goal 3 &
one goal 4; one goal 2 & one 4
2 = both goals 2s; one goal 2 & one 3; one goal 1 & one 3; one goal 4 & one 1
1= both goals 1s; one goal 1 & one 2
Mr. WatersMSGP was rated 3Second SLG was
rated 3
X-Axis Rating = Level 3 SLG Rating
Y-Axis = PP/PR Rating Add up all component scores
for total points possible; Divide by number of
components in your rubric; Get a rating between 1 and 4; Use Y-Axis threshold to
determine PP/PR level: 3.6 - 4.0 = 4 2.81-3.59 =3 1.99 – 2.8 = 2 * < 1.99 = 1
*PP/PR Scoring Rule: If the educator scores two 1’s in any PP/PR component and his/her average score falls between 1.99-2.499, the educator’s performance level cannot be rated above a 1.
Mr. Waters District rubric with 20
components Component ratings:
17 components were rated 3; and 3 were rated 2 = 57 points possible
57/20=2.85
2.85 = Level 3 PP/PR Rating
*Inquiry Process
Mr. Waters: Y-axis = 3 & X-axis = 3
Y-A
xis:
PP
/ P
R
LEVEL 4
Collegial
*SLG Inquiry
3
Facilitative or
Collegial
* SLG Inquiry
3 or 4
Facilitative
4
Facilitative
4
LEVEL 3
Collegial or Consulting
*SLG Inquiry
2 or 3
Collegial
3
Collegial
3
Collegial
3
LEVEL 2
Consulting
2
Consulting
2
Consulting
2
Collegial or Consulting
* PP/PR Inquiry
2 or 3
LEVEL 1
Directed
1
Directed
1
Consulting or
Directed
* PP/PR Inquiry
1 or 2
Consulting
* PP/PR Inquiry
2
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
X-Axis: SLG
Your Turn!
Use the data packet provided to answer these questions: What is Mr. Hendricks’ Y-axis rating? What is Mr. Hendricks’ MSGP?
Use the “State Median Student Growth Percentile Criteria” (p.5 of SGP Guidance, Table 3)
What is Mr. Hendricks’ X-axis rating?
Share Out
Connecting SGPs and SLGs
SLG Requirements for 2015-16
REQUIRED8 components including
Rationale
Minimum of 2 SLG goals each year
Statewide assessments (Category 1) required for teachers and principals in tested grades and subjects
Oregon Matrix used for summative evaluation
RECOMMENDEDContent is focused, not
everything you teach
Context can help ascertain instructional needs
Tier goals/targets where appropriate
Include the support YOU need
How do SGPs change the goal setting and scoring processes?
Teachers and principals in grades 4- 8 in ELA and math
All other educators
Teachers and Principals in Grades 4 – 8 ELA and Math
FALL Set one SLG goal
Quality Review Checklist used for goal setting Goal can use either Category 1 or Category 2
measures Using fall roster data, select either ELA or Math
for MSGP At goal setting conference discuss supports and
strategies needed to help students achieve on Smarter Balanced as well as written goal
WINTERMid-year conference to discuss progress,
revise strategies and supports
Teachers and Principals in Grades 4 – 8 ELA and Math
SPRINGVerify class rosterScore SLG goal
Goal scored using the statewide SLG Scoring Rubric
FALLReceive MSGP rating Use Oregon Matrix used to identify
summative score
All Other Educators
FALL Set two SLG goals
Quality Review Checklist used for goal setting Goals can use either Category 1 (statewide
assessments) or Category 2 (school or district-wide assessments) measures
WINTERMid-year conference to discuss progress,
revise strategies and supports for goals
All Other Educators
SPRINGScore SLG goals
Category 2 goals scored using the statewide SLG Scoring Rubric
Use Oregon Matrix used to identify summative score
Special Education/ Interventionists
SGPs only apply to teachers who are the primary providers of instruction
Only the SGPs of students who take the statewide assessment (Smarter) in ELA or math are used in identifying an educator’s MSGP
Teachers for whom the majority of students take the Extended Assessment (EA) write a goal using the EA as the measure and score it using the statewide rubric
Things to Keep in Mind…
Teachers on a two year cycle MAY select two of the four goals from the cycle
Educators in tested grades and subjects must use one Category 1 goal rating in summative evaluation (Matrix)
Remaining questions?