13
^— "T r AD/A-003 496 DARPA-NRL INTEGRATED OPTICS PROGRAM QUARTERLY TEOHNIOAL REPORT TO DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY William K. Burns, et al Naval Research Laboratory Prepared for: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Dece mbe r 197 4 DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ National Technical Information Service U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

^— "T

r AD/A-003 496

DARPA-NRL INTEGRATED OPTICS PROGRAM QUARTERLY TEOHNIOAL REPORT TO DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY

William K. Burns, et al

Naval Research Laboratory

Prepared for:

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

Dece mbe r 197 4

DISTRIBUTED BY:

KJlJ National Technical Information Service U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Page 2: DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

-*" ■'-■—- «mm*

627119 i.

NRL R«iMKt2n»

00 o o

DARPA-NRL Integrated Optics Program Quarterly Technical Report

to Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

September 1,1974 - December 1,1974 DARPA Order No. 2327

Prepared by

WILLIAM K. BURNS AND THOMAS G. GIALLOWNZI

Optical Physics Branch Optical Sciences Division

December 1974

^D D O

TT

iduced by

NATIONAL TECHNICAI INFORMATION SERVICE U S Department of Commi

NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY Washington, D.O.

Approved for puMic retcM«: dis^ibuiion unUmiled.

^^^mmmm-^i

Page 3: DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

mmmm " '" ll11 ' "

The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency or the U.S. Government.

inis «MM SKKH

rc »mi SKtlH Q

1 JBUlflMilOl

11 DiSTIHaTIM/»»»!"»"-!^ CtoO

■■■■tf

■-'■ ■■ ■-■■ -■ ■ ■ ■ i HI iniMtMMMIhlBltliüMiMiinai

Page 4: DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

mmmm—m* iwmnpnpBMiipi i «iimuii niHpi ii i iw

I SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PACE (Whan Dmlm Enffd) -

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER

NRL Memorandum Report 2970

2 COVT ACCESSION NO

4 TITLE fand Subi/(l«)

DARPA-NRL INTEGRATED OPTICS PROGRAM - Quarterly Technical Report to Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency — September 1, 1974 — December 1, 1974

T. AUTMORft;

William K. Burns and Thomas G. Giallorenzi

9 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADORtSS

Naval Research Laboratory Washington, D.C. 20375

11 CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Washington, DC. 22209

U MONITORING AGENCY NAME ft ADDRESSfK dllltfol from Conlrotllnt OtIU »J

READ INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING FORM

J RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER

5. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD CCv/ERED

Interim report on a contin .ing problem.

S. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER

8 CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERC»)

10. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECT, TASK AREA 6 WORK UNIT NUMBERS

NRL Problem NOVSS DARPA Order 2327

12. REPORT DATE

December 1974 13. NUMBER OF PAGES

11 15. SECURITY CLASS, (ol Ihl* rmpon)

Unclassified

IS«. DECLASSIFI CATION/DOWN GRADING SCHEDULE

16 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of (Mi Ktpott)

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (ol lh» mbilrmet »nfrtd In Block 30, II dHUrtnl from Report;

IS SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

IS. KEY WORDS (Conllnum on fr»f »Id» II nyc»»»arr and ld»nllly by block num'>»r)

Integrated optics Branching waveguides Optical waveguides Indiffused LiN!>ü:, waveguides

20. ABSTRACT (Conl m» on r»r»r»» »Id» II n»c»»»mry mtd Idtnilly by block numbor)

The ARPA-NRL Integrated Optics program is concerned with the development of infrared integrated optics technology and with the development of a single-mode optical data bus. This report summarizes the NRL in-house progress in the area of indiffused LiNbOß waveguides, separating waveguides for the data bus, and single-mode optical data bus planning. In particular, the results of a theoretical study of separating waveguides are presented.

DD I JAN 71 1^73 COITION OF I NOV68 ISOBSOLETB i S/N 0102-0U-6S01 I

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAOE (Whit Data Bnlarad;

iff'iii-iiAiii I II r -i MI." ^^^^■■k^uk. . ^. v ■ rilTiiiiaMl till ill J»

Page 5: DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

i" '■■'■i'i-W.* » wmmmmmmw"-"•—' ■ ,-.,.■.„,■,. IIJJPIUII, |(»<1»>1UU««1».'1P"W"" ."»1> !PH'"'

CÜNTKMTS

warterly Technical Heport 1

Technical SummaTy 2

Heferences 4

Figures 5

iii

.._. -J.-...,.^,. ■.■.^... ,.,.. - ...~. -^^ -■- -- - ■j'—' •-■ -- . j ^jj^B

Page 6: DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

1 ' ■ ■■■■■ .

QUARTERLY TECHNICAL REPORT

Reporting Period

1 September 1974 - I December 1974

1. DAHPA Order

2. Program Code Number

3. Name of Contractor

4. Effective Date of Contract

5. Contract Expiration Date

6. Amount of Contract

7. Contract Number

8. Principal Investigator

9. Phone Number

10. Scientific Officer

11. Title of Work

2327

3D10

Naval Research Laboratory Optical Sciences Division

1 July 1974

Continuing

$110K

N/A

Dr. T. G. Giallorenzl

(202) 767-3209

Dr. C. M. Stlckley

A Coordinated Research Program tc Develop Infrared Integrated Optics and Single Kode Optical Data Trans- fer Links.

Sponsored by

BBFBNS£ ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY DARPA Order No. 2327

. . . ■■•--—"11 i aiHiiHWtjMrilln . .■^-.■.■^.—> ^^. —^-.^■.■JMWM.-,. ..... .-

Page 7: DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

p^w ,i ■ wmm Mi

-,... ,^... ,. , ,.4VP'" ■■■■■ ■.

TECHNICAL SUMMARY

TECHNICAL STATUS

This report summarizes the results of two Journal papers on separating waveguides (references 3 and 4) which we recently submitted

for publication.

OBJECTIVES

The main aim of this study Is to develop and characterize an electro-optic branching waveguide switch In a LlNb03 optical waveguide system. Such a switch could be devised In several ways: as a single electro-optically controlled branch, or by two 3-db couplers (branches or otherwise) connected by an active phase shifter In one arm. Also operation with planar waveguides or three-dimensional channel waveguides

could be considered.

THEORETICAL STUDIES

A. Mode Conversion In Branching Waveguides

Branching waveguides have previously been studied experimentally only for cases of very slow tapers and asymmetric branches.U) It is expected that under more general conditions of arbitrary tapers and symmetry input modes will undergo mode conversion to other guided and radiation modes as they propagate through the branch. This problem of mode conversion in branching waveguides has been extensively studied theoretically under this contract. Using quasi-normal modes and a step transition model to approximate the taper, coupled amplitude equations that describe mode conversion were derived and programmed. This allowed us to study mode conversion as a function of taper slope and mode synchronism, which is adjusted by branch asymmetry. When the taper slope is large in a near symmetric structure, considerable mode conversion will occur and the structure will act as a power divider (Fig. lb). Incident power concentrated in the upper and lower parts of the structure will end up in the upper and lower arms of the branch, respectively. This behavior is usually required for conventional evanescent couplers. However, in a more asymmetric structure with smaller taper slope, mode conversion is negligible and the structure will act as a mode splitter (Fig. la). Mode power is then transferred to one arm of the branch or the other. By using more conventional coupled mode theory we were then able to approximately define the transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by:

Aß/ey > .43

Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide separation, 6 is the taper slope, and y is the decay constant of the field in the separating region. Fig. 2 is a plot of computer

■ II ■Mil i^lMIIIB ■MMiuriM

Page 8: DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

1 ■■ I" I —^ ^-^-_ immmmvmi.'mwmvi"»' IIIHIRmww

calculated, mode converted amplitudes vs th* ^oi i

B. Tapered Velocity Coupler

tapered^v^ol^Tco^pl^rs^lch Trl ^ Sf aPPlled t0 the Prob1«« «f film couplitiR and also nn^JM/ expected to be useful for fiber- (50-50 power didders) Talell \ *< COnStructlon °f 3-db couplers 100% power trlsfer beiweln'two .uld^n. ' T^" '" Capable of nearly to provide mode synchronem o'r'a cr^lcal co^n1^?"' ^ re^ir—' synchronism need only be achieved at a «1^1^^^ *?' "^ middle of the couoler rh* !Z \. single point somewhere In the (Fig. 3) depend^ the IbLncH ^df a ^T' VelOClty ^^ is coupled into mode l! which is pr^^rT"1011 ^ the deVlce- Power

thickness of waveguide a Is L.r/^.7 ln Wave8uide •• and as the b- Power is thus'transLrred from'! ^J iS tran8fer"d to waveguide as there is no powL^trtsfel llZ ZlTtl III TTti I? ^ approximate theory of mode conversion ^ArL^ *' y adaptin8 our

have been able to estimate ™OH! . ? branching waveguides, we the tapered velocity copier in teZTl^J^T the mode8 * and -1 ** in mode synchronism: Ä ^ tTcA'S^r"1-^ ^^^

wm8^8^^- The de8lred —- pas^^of't^; IT- ^

dAß dz < 5.9 KK*

^utedhd:vLe:"^:iortLh^:f rof tapered veioc"y ^™ - «v1Ces without the need for computer calculations.

C. Optical Waveguide Power Dividers

by Interfering tw ptase shlfrt^ ^ J waveguides which operates a device (Fl/ « ffnü. .^ ^v*"""1 uave8- ^ POMlbUlty for such

designed M Ina ^ s^c hed"^"' ^12 ff'1« f "» b'

^X^tfi c^rro? sr\'^^ Input mode f«. tta Sf J^^jL'.'"!^1SMl,,Ml BUb «avegulde. An . - o *ere synchron!™ ^«eln thet^TuL^'r"^""," ^ ""^ At this point the svmmetrjrw.» A

S, U "'"P'iy Introduced. the coupled stJuctu^Tsre excited 'T *ntJT""8"1"1 (b) °od" •' Synchronls. Is then"lo^Vr^ed by tsperLrth.^" 1 thC 1,,PUt P0«r- that .ode a seXects ars, #£. while „od'e h^St a™« ^ ."'< 8° should be reciprocal, and split Incident JH"^™ he/ lr c^ ™

■ ■ . - ■ ■--

Page 9: DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

I — ■• ■ >«m».iaii>ii.p<fj«H in i .,. in 11 i.i» i •»i •••^mr

EXPERIMENTAL WORK

We ha/e built and are testing Ni diffused LlNbO^ optical waveguides as reported by Schmidt and Kamlnow. (2) Low loss multlmode guides have been obtained and efforts are being directed towards achieving single mode operation. The work In LINbOo Is being complimented by additional diffusion work In glasses. This glass work Is aimed at perfecting fabrication procedures for forming single mode channel waveguide structures.

Under a related program, we (G. B. Hocker and W. K. Burn?) have produced a theory that fully describes light guiding in diffused wave- guides of arbitrary index profile. A universal chart was developed which allows us to obtain relevant waveguide parameters without any additional numerical computation.

We also are planning to build the optical waveguide power divider shown in Fig. 4 in a S102-glass waveguide system to test the theoreti- cal branching waveguide predictions. To date construction of a fast taper (1 micron in 5) has been achieved in an S102 film. This was done by sputter etching a photolithographically delineated AI2O3 mask, With most of the analysis and design work completed, we plan to concentrate our efforts in the next quarter on the various experimental aspects of separating and indiffused guides.

MISCELLANEOUS

The material on mode conversion in branching waveguides will be published in J. Quantum Electronics.(3) The material on the tapered velocity coupler has been submitted to Applied Optics,^) and was also partially supported by the Office of Naval Research.

In collaboration with ONR (Code 411) a development plan entitled, "Integrated Optics and Single Mode Fiber Development Plan," was written in which future plans are discussed for demonstrating a shipboard single mode optical data bus and a switchboard. This develop- ment plan is designed to take advantage of ARPA and ONR developed inte- grated optics technology and apply this technology to a meaningful Naval data transfer system.

References

1. H. Yajima, "Dielectric Thin Film Optical Branching Waveguide," Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol 22, pp 647-649 (1973).

2. R.V. Schmidt and I.P. Kaminow, "Metal-diffused Optical Waveguides in LiNbOj," Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol 25, pp 453-460 (1974).

3. W.K. Burns and A.F. Milton, "Mode Conversion in Planar Dielectric Separating Waveguides," J. Quantum Electronics, Jan. 1975.

4. A.F. Milton and W.K. Burns, "The Design of Tapered Velocity Couplers for Integrated Optics," subultted to Applied Optics.

-'■ •"-' •-'—--■ ., 1, , '— II I ■ - -- -^

Page 10: DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

«IPP^—- ,"1 w^mmm^^^^^^ m^^Bim^*w****m* W

Fig 1 - Mode conversion in a branching or separating waveguide depicting operation a. a mode splitter (la - es«ntially no mode converaion). and a a power divider (lb - .igmficant mode con-^ venS (Mode synchronism varies as the refractive index difference between the top and bottom

cl&dding layers. An).

Page 11: DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

CD in 5f to

fv ouvd Bamndi^v 6

CM

-—-^—.. ... WBM -L " — ■ - - '

Page 12: DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

w* m*mfi*^~**^**m i ■ ,-^^mm mm • i" ■ ■ " >■

- ■ -

Page 13: DISTRIBUTED BY: KJlJ · transition boundary between a mode splitter and a power divider by: Aß/ey > .43 Here Aß is the difference in mode propagation constant for large wave- guide

■pp^^^^wi

3-DB COUPLER

OVERLAY WITH FAST AND SLOW TAPERS

ARM #2

ARM #1

W/W A B 77777777777 -* z

INPUT OUTPUT

Fig. 4 — A 3-dB coupler or 50-50 power divider which utilizes the modal evolution of local normal modes. Synchronism is required only at the point z • 0.

8

. -,_- iiMlaiianiiiiii i i i SII imiir in ■:-.. ■Jf.„... ^ ■ ^--^ -■:- ->.-....-^- — ■■ ... ■.■■ minaumi I^I .KtB