21
A Study of the Perceptions of Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives in Producing Improved Productive Work Cultures DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch

DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

A Study of the Perceptions of Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives in Producing Improved Productive Work Cultures

DISSERTATION DEFENSERobert Crouch

Page 2: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Chapter 1• Purpose of Study• Setting of Study• Theoretical Framework• Research Questions• Quantitative: Three Questions• Qualitative: Two Questions

Page 3: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Variable Research Question Survey Section 

Independent: perceptions of diversity and inclusion initiatives Dependent: Work culture 

Question 1: What are the perceptions of departmental personnel regarding the impact of diversity and inclusion initiatives in improving and sustaining productive work cultures? Question 1a: What are the differences between managers’ and staff members’ ratings with respect to their perceptions of the effectiveness of diversity and inclusion initiatives? 

Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey: Section 2

Relationship with Team Members

Relationship with Manager Individual’s Behaviors and

Attitudes Overall Work Culture

Independent: perceptions of diversity and inclusion initiatives Dependent: Work culture

Question 2: What types of diversity and inclusion initiatives are identified by departmental personnel as useful to their work culture; and what differences if any are identified by managers and staff? 

Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey: Section 1 • Workshops and learning modules• Executive coaching• Mentoring • Team coaching• Use of web-based information

     

Independent: perceptions of diversity and inclusion initiatives  Dependent: Work culture

Question 3: What is the relationship between departmental personnel’s ratings of their perceptions of diversity and inclusion initiatives and work culture scores? 

Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey: Section 2 and Morehead Model of Workforce Commitment Survey: Each Department’s Tier Score  

Variables, Research Questions and Quantitative Survey Alignment

Page 4: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Focus Group Questions 

  Quantitative Survey Sections 

Question 1: What factors influenced your rating of questions on the survey?       Question 2: What additional strategies/initiatives do you feel would positively impact your work culture?

 Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey: Section 2 Relationship with Team

Members Relationship with Manager Individual’s Behaviors and

Attitudes Overall Work Culture 

Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey: Sections 1 • Workshops and learning modules• Executive coaching• Mentoring • Team coaching• Use of web-based information

  

  

  

Qualitative Focus Group Questions and Survey Alignment

Page 5: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature• Four sections:

1. Diverse and Inclusive Work Cultures; 2. Characteristics of Highly Effective Teams; 3. Workplace Diversity Initiatives; and4. Measures for Assessing Work Cultures

Page 6: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Chapter 3: Methodology

• Mixed methods explanatory sequential study including both quantitative and qualitative data collection

• Explanatory sequential mixed methods design• Quantitative data collected• Qualitative data collected

• The survey administered in 60-minute focus group sessions

• Study includes 5 departments within the hospital health system• Researcher worked with the department/area between 2011-2015 • Department/area increased its work culture Tier score during a one-to-

two year period (between 2011-2015).

Page 7: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Chapter 4: Findings

Instruments:1. Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey• Modified by the researcher• Permission granted from original researcher• Validity and reliability established through experts in the

field of diversity and piloting the survey • Cronbach Alpha: .796346, indicating strong reliability

2. Morehead Model of Workforce Commitment Survey• Work culture tier scores

3. Focus Groups• Five one-hour sessions

Page 8: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Chapter 5: Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations

Chapter Organization:• Summary of Data in Chapter 4 for each research

question• Conclusions of Summary Data• Research: Chapter 2 Review of Related

Literature1. Diverse and Inclusive Work Cultures; 2. Characteristics of Highly Effective Teams; 3. Workplace Diversity Initiatives; and4. Measures for Assessing Work Cultures

• Theoretical Framework• Model of Change Theory• Two Factor Theory• Agency Theory

Page 9: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Position Employees Percent

Manager 14 20.3

Staff 55 79.7

Total 69 100.0

Survey Participant Demographics: Job Position

Page 10: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Research Question 1• What are the perceptions of departmental personnel

regarding the impact of diversity and inclusion initiatives in improving and sustaining productive work cultures?

• One-Sample Z Test (each department)• Section 2 of Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey• Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives• workshops and learning modules; executive coaching; mentoring;

team coaching; and use of web-based information

• Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis• Probability (p-value less than .05)

• Alternative Hypothesis True (significant relationship)

• ARS Clickers Utilized

• Qualitative Question 1: What factors influenced your rating of questions on the survey?

• Major Themes

Page 11: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Survey Constructs

Department A Department B Department C Department D Department E 

Relationship with Team Members

 

p-value not less than .05

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

  

p-value not less than .05

Relationship with Manager

 

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

p-value not less than .05

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

 

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

  

Individual’s Behavior and

Attitudes 

p-value not less than .05

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

  

Overall Work Culture

 

p-value not less than .05

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

p-value less than .05

(Significant Relationship)

p-value not less than .05

Summary Table of Findings: Research Question 1: Perceptions of Departmental Personnel of Impact of Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives

Page 12: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Department Major Themes

 

Department A  Department B     Department C   Department D   Department E

Effective Training and EducationOpen Communication within Department Open Communication with Emphasis on Diversity, Differences and RespectTraining and Workshops to Increase Awareness Increase in TeamworkTrusting AtmosphereDiversity Workshops Working Together as a TeamIncreased CommunicationWorkshops  Increased Awareness of DiversityIncreased Conversations Among Co-WorkersDiversity Workshops

 

Major Themes Reflected by Five Departmental Focus Groups: What Factors Influenced Your Rating of Questions on the Survey?

Page 13: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Research Question 1A•What are the differences between managers’ and staff members’ ratings with respect to their perceptions of the effectiveness of diversity and inclusion initiatives?

• Two-Sample Z Test (each department)• Section 2 of Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey• Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis• Probability (p-value less than .05)

• Alternative Hypothesis True (significant relationship)

Page 14: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Survey Constructs Department A Department B Department C Department D Department E 

Relationship with Team Members

 

p-value not less than .05

p-value not less than .05

p-value less than .05 (Significant Difference)

 

p-value not less than .05

p-value less than .05 (Significant Difference)

Relationship with Manager

 

p-value not less than .05

p-value less than .05 (Significant Difference)

p-value not less than .05

p-value not less than .05

p-value less than .05 (Significant Difference)

 

Individual’s Behavior and Attitudes

 

p-value not less than .05

p-value less than .05 (Significant Difference)

p-value less than .05 (Significant Difference)

p-value less than .05 (Significant Difference)

p-value less than .05 (Significant Difference)

Overall Work Culture 

p-value not less than .05

p-value not less than .05

p-value not less than .05

p-value less than .05 (Significant Difference)

p-value less than .05 (Significant Difference)

Summary Table of Findings: Research Question 1a: Differences Between Managers’ and Staff Members Ratings on Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey Section 2

Page 15: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Research Question 2•What types of diversity and inclusion initiatives are identified by departmental personnel as useful to their work culture; and what differences if any are identified by managers and staff?

• Researcher worked with departments• All departments not exposed to each initiative• Section 1 of Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey• Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives• workshops and learning modules; executive coaching;

mentoring; team coaching; and use of web-based information

• Qualitative Question 2: What additional strategies/initiatives do you feel would positively impact your work culture?

Page 16: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives 

Department A Department B Department C Department D Department E

Workshops and Learning Modules 

Manager & Staff Ranked 1

Manager Ranked 1Staff Ranked 2

Manager & Staff Ranked 1

Manager Ranked 1Staff Ranked 2

Manager & Staff Ranked 1  

Executive Coaching 

Not Ranked Manager Ranked 3

Not Ranked Not Ranked Not Ranked  

Mentoring (one-on-one) 

Not Ranked Not Ranked Not Ranked Not Ranked Not Ranked

Team Coaching 

Manager & Staff Ranked 2

Manager Ranked 2Staff Ranked 1

Manager & Staff Ranked 2

Manager Ranked 1Staff Ranked 2

Manager & Staff Ranked 2  

Use of Web-based Information

Manager & Staff Ranked 3

Not Ranked Not Ranked Manager Ranked 3

Not Ranked

Summary Table of Findings: Research Question 2: Rankings of Top Three Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives Identified by Departmental Personnel as Most Impactful (Useful) to their Work Culture

Page 17: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Department Strategies/Initiatives

 

Department A   Department B   Department C    Department D   Department E

Team Building WorkshopsBecome Comfortable with the UncomfortableProvide Ownership/Involvement Continue to Increase CommunicationHuddle time in AM for about 5-MinutesWalk Together in Spare Time Use Respectful Tones with EveryoneContinue to Work on Effective CommunicationModel Respectful Behavior Daily Continue to Work as a TeamContinue to Communicate Effectively  Practice More Active ListeningContinue Inclusive MeetingsContinue Workshops and Trainings 

Major Strategies/Initiatives Reflected by Five Departmental Focus Groups: What Additional Strategies/Initiatives do you Feel Would Positively Impact Your Work Culture?

Page 18: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Research Question 3• What is the relationship between departmental

personnel’s ratings of their perceptions of diversity and inclusion initiatives and work culture scores?

• Two Step Analysis• Multiple Regression• T-test for Regression Slope

• Section 2 of Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey• Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis• Probability (p-value less than .05)

• Alternative Hypothesis True (significant relationship)

Page 19: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Tier Ranges and Departmental Tier Scores• Tier Ranges

• Tier 1 desired level ( 4.15 & higher)• Tier 2 (3.80 – 4.14)• Tier 3 (3.79 and below)

Department Pre-Tier Score Post-Tier Score

A 3.98 4.05

B 4.09 4.42

C 3.53 4.18

D 4.47 4.58

E 3.67 4.29

Page 20: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Survey Constructs Department A Department B Department C Department D Department E 

Relationship with Team Members

 

No Significant Relationship

Significant Relationship

Existed

Significant Relationship

Existed

No Significant Relationship

No Significant Relationship

  

Relationship with Manager

 

Significant Relationship

Existed

No Significant Relationship

No Significant Relationship

Significant Relationship

Existed

Significant Relationship

Existed 

Individual’s Behavior and Attitudes

 

Significant Relationship

Existed

Significant Relationship

Existed

No Significant Relationship

Significant Relationship

Existed

No Significant Relationship

  

Overall Work Culture 

No Significant Relationship

No Significant Relationship

Significant Relationship

Existed

No Significant Relationship

No Significant Relationship

Summary of Findings :Research Question 3: Relationship Between Departmental Personnel’s Ratings on Diversity and Inclusion Perceptions Survey Section 2 and Work Culture Tier Scores

Page 21: DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:

Recommendations for Further Research

1. It is recommended that this study be replicated to include a larger sample of departments/areas.

2. It is recommended that further investigation to determine initiatives/factors that are perceived to increase Work Culture Tier Scores.

3. It is recommended that further investigation should be conducted to determine how mediating variables such as staff satisfaction, staff relationship with manager and staff overall performance influence Work Culture Tier Scores.