37
5/12/2015 ENERGY STAR ® Version 7.0 Draft 2 Displays Stakeholder Webinar May 7, 2015 Verena Radulovic, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Jeremy Dommu, U.S. Department of Energy ENERGY STAR Products Labeling Program Webinar Details Webinar slides and related materials will be available on the Displays Product Development Web page: www.energystar.gov/revisedspecs Follow link to “Version 7.0 is in Development” under “Displays” Audio provided via teleconference: Call in: +1 (877) 423-6338 (U.S.) +1 (571) 281-2578 (International) Code: 198-920 # Phone lines will remain open during discussion Please mute line unless speaking Press *6 to mute and *6 to un-mute your line 2 1

Displays Draft 2 Webinar Slides - Energy Star 05 07...Version 7.0 Draft 2 Displays Stakeholder Webinar. May 7, 2015. Verena Radulovic, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Jeremy Dommu,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 5/12/2015

    ENERGY STAR® Version 7.0 Draft 2 Displays

    Stakeholder Webinar

    May 7, 2015

    Verena Radulovic, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Jeremy Dommu, U.S. Department of Energy

    ENERGY STAR Products Labeling Program

    Webinar Details • Webinar slides and related materials will be available on the

    Displays Product Development Web page: – www.energystar.gov/revisedspecs – Follow link to “Version 7.0 is in Development” under “Displays”

    • Audio provided via teleconference: Call in: +1 (877) 423-6338 (U.S.)

    +1 (571) 281-2578 (International) Code: 198-920 #

    – Phone lines will remain open during discussion – Please mute line unless speaking – Press *6 to mute and *6 to un-mute your line

    2

    1

    www.energystar.gov/revisedspecs

  • 5/12/2015

    Time Topic 11:00–11:15 Introduction & Test Method Update

    11:15–11:45 Definitions, Scope, General Requirements

    11:45–12:45 Monitors Total Energy Consumption

    12:45–1:15 Signage Displays

    1:15–2:00 Open Discussion, Next Steps

    Webinar Agenda

    Introductions Verena Radulovic U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    Matt Malinowski ICF International

    Rachel Unger ICF International

    Tom Bolioli Terra Novum

    Bruce Nordman Lawrence Berkley National Laboratory

    3

    Jeremy DommuU.S. Department of Energy

    Allen Tsao Navigant Consulting

    Kevin Morrissey Navigant Consulting

    Jonathan Wood European Commission

    Bob Harrison European Commission

    4

    2

  •      

    5/12/2015

    Written Comments In addition to making verbal comments during today’s call, stakeholders are encouraged to submit written comments to [email protected].

    Comment Deadline

    Friday, May 22, 2015

    5

    ENERGY STAR Displays Overview • First specification introduced in 1992 • 2002 – Agreement with EU and EPA to coordinate

    Office Equipment labeling • 2009 – EPA and DOE ENERGY STAR Partnership • Version 6.0 Displays Specification finalized

    September 2012 and effective June 1, 2013

    4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0

    Specification Version Effective Dates

    2005 2009 2013 2016

    6

    3

    mailto:[email protected]

  • 5/12/2015

    Version 6.0 Displays Today

    • 1214 models certified to Version 6.0 from 57 ENERGY STAR Brand Owner Partners as of January 2015

    – Monitors:

    • Ac-powered (1050 models)

    • Dc-powered (7 models)

    – Signage: 157 models

    7

    Version 7.0 Activities to Date • February 24, 2014: Draft 1 Test Method Released &

    Data Call

    • November 18, 2014: Draft 1 Specification and Draft 2 Test Method released to stakeholders

    • April 21, 2015: Draft 2 Specification released

    • Today, May 7: Overview of Draft 2 Specification

    8

    4

  • 5/12/2015

    Test Method Updates • Version 7.0 Draft 2 Test Method based on Version 6.0

    • Updates in Draft 1: – Updated test configuration for DC-powered Displays – Test language clarifications

    • Updates following Draft 1: – New test for Full Network Connectivity – Clarifications based on stakeholder feedback from Draft 1

    • No Draft 3 Test Method, but Final Draft Test Method will be released with Final Draft Specification

    9

    Webinar Agenda Time Topic 11:00–11:15 Introduction & Test Method Update

    11:15–11:45 Definitions, Scope, General Requirements

    11:45–12:45 Monitors Total Energy Consumption

    12:45–1:15 Signage Displays

    1:15–2:00 Open Discussion, Next Steps

    10

    5

  • 5/12/2015

    Product Types • In Draft 1, EPA proposed revised definitions based on pixel

    density where: – >5,000 pixels/in2 is a Monitor; and – ≤5,000 pixels/in2 is Signage

    • Stakeholders commented that certain Signage, for example those with UHD resolution, could have >5,000 pixels/in2

    • In Draft 2, EPA is proposing a set of quantitative criteria to classify Monitors and Signage Displays including – Size; – Pixel Density; and – Luminance

    11

    Product Types • EPA is proposing the following language in Draft 2:

    a) Monitor: An electronic display intended for one person to view in a desk based

    environment.

    b) Signage Display: An electronic display intended for multiple people to view in

    non-desk based environments, such as retail or department stores,

    restaurants, museums, hotels, outdoor venues, airports, conference rooms or

    classrooms. For the purposes of this specification, a display shall be classified

    as a signage display if it meets two or more criteria listed below:

    (1)Diagonal screen size is greater than 30 inches; (2)Maximum Reported Luminance is greater than 400 candelas per

    square meter; or (3)Pixel density is less than or equal to 5,000 pixels per square

    inch.

    12

    6

  • 5/12/2015

    Product Types • EPA is also considering additional qualitative criteria to

    distinguish Signage from Monitors, such as: – Designed for wall installation or mounting on a stand – Ability to perform scaling for use in video walls; – Unique addressing; – Remote-control disabling; – Vertical and horizontal orientation; – Continuous use; and – Networking

    13

    Color Gamut • EPA received feedback that reporting of color gamut under

    Version 6.0 is inconsistent, making it difficult to compare performance – Some models are reported in the NSTC space – Other models are reported in terms of sRGB and Adobe®

    • In Draft 2, EPA proposes:

    3) Color Gamut: Color gamut area shall be reported in the CIE 1976 u' v' color space per Section 5.18 Gamut Area of the Information Display Measurements Standard Version 1.03.

    14

    7

  • 5/12/2015

    Color Gamut • CIE 1976 (a.k.a. CIELUV or u’ v’) beneficial

    because it contains all perceptible colors and it is larger than the largest implementation of color management (ProPhoto).

    • Use of CIELAB (a.k.a. CIE 1976 L*a*b*) and its 1994/2000 updates (typically denoted as CIE D50 in color matching profiles) is becoming more popular.

    15

    Plug-In Module • EPA has revised the Draft 1 definition of “Internal

    Processor” to “Plug-in Module” – Focuses on add-on modularity/plug-in enhancements for

    either rendering images or processing touch signals – Intended to exclude any processing capability that might meet

    the threshold of a computer for general computing including devices covered under the ENERGY STAR Program for Computers

    16

    8

  • 5/12/2015

    Plug-In Module • EPA is proposing the following language in Draft 2:

    5) Plug-in Module: A modular plugin device that provides one or more of

    the following functions without the explicit purpose of providing general

    computing function:

    a) Display images, mirror remote content streamed to it, or otherwise render content on the screen from local or remote sources; or b) Process touch signals.

    Note: Modules providing additional input options are not considered Plug-in Modules for the purposes of this specification.

    17

    Power Management

    • In response to Draft 1, one stakeholder suggested the automatic power down time be revised from 15 minutes to 5 minutes which: – Is likely to have little impact on user experience; – Saves energy

    iv. Monitors shall automatically enter Sleep Mode or Off Mode within

    5 minutes of being disconnected from a host computer.

    18

    9

  • 5/12/2015

    Webinar Agenda Time Topic 11:00–11:15 Introduction & Test Method Update

    11:15–11:45 Definitions, Scope, General Requirements

    11:45–12:45 Monitors Total Energy Consumption

    12:45–1:15 Signage Displays

    1:15–2:00 Open Discussion, Next Steps

    19

    Monitors Dataset Overview

    • EPA refreshed the dataset with all Version 6.0 certified models as of December 2014 – 1050 models binned by diagonal screen size and resolution – 40 Enhanced Performance Displays Bins Total Resolution (Megapixels)

    Size (in.) Res (MP) 0.48-1.049 1.296 1.311-1.44 1.764 2.074 2.765-3.686 4.954 8.294 All

    Bins 1.05 1.30 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.80 5.00 8.00

  • 5/12/2015

    On Mode Power All Ac-Powered Monitors

    21

    On Mode Power Ac-Powered Monitors Less than 22’’

    22

    11

  • 5/12/2015

    Monitors Draft 1 On Mode Requirements

    • In Draft 1, EPA proposed a single asymptotic On Mode Power requirement line w/ Area and Resolution – Accounts for flat component efficiency at larger screen sizes – Provides a cap on total power – Allows for fine adjustment and consistent approach across

    the size bins – Stakeholders were generally in agreement with this approach

    Product Type PON Max (watts)

    Where: A = Viewable screen area in in2 r = Total screen resolution in megapixels

    Monitors െ 63.0 0.3 0.0040ܣ ൈ ሺ ݄ܽ݊ 17.1 ൈ 2.0 ݎ ݐ ൈ

    23

    Monitors Draft 1 On Mode Requirements

    24

    12

  •                                                       

                                                         

    5/12/2015

    Total Energy Consumption (TEC) Overview • In Draft 1, EPA proposed the TEC approach and has

    now incorporated it into Draft 2 for Monitors only – As new features and functionality come into the market and

    are enabled during Sleep Mode, allows for flexibility while still continuing to drive efficiency

    – Reduces the need to have a large number of relatively small sleep allowances

    – Lessens the criticality of the actual adder values for the ones that are included

    – EPA would continue to require reporting of On, Sleep, and Off Mode power levels, but the requirement for On and Sleep would be expressed in kWh per year

    25

    Modal Assumptions • Based on Computer modal assumptions – the time

    spent in On Mode corresponds to Computer Short Idle: 35% in On Mode, 65% in Sleep Mode

    Short Idle: The mode where the Computer has reached an Idle condition (i.e., 5 minutes after OS boot or after completing an active workload or after resuming from Sleep Mode), the screen is on, and Long Idle power management features have not engaged (e.g. HDD is spinning and the Computer is prevented from entering sleep mode).

    26

    13

  • 5/12/2015

    Modal to TEC Conversion • Power in On Mode and Sleep Mode is converted to TEC:

    – On Mode: 35% x 365 days/year x 24 hr/day = 3,066 hr/year – Sleep Mode: 65% x 365 days/year x 24 hr/day = 5,694 hr/year

    • Example Calculation for a typical Monitor: ETEC ൌ 8.76 ൈ 0.35 ൈ 19W 0.65 ൈ 0.3W ൌ 8.76 ൈ 6.65 0.195

    ൌ 60kWh/yr 27

    Modal to TEC Conversion • The resolution allowance is calculated as follows:

    – 2.0 W per Total Native Resolution (Megapixel) in On Mode

    – (2.0 W/MP x 3,066 hours)/1000 = 6.13 kWh/Megapixel

    • The overall Maximum TEC equation was adjusted to recognize a similar percentage of models as the Draft 1 On Mode Criteria

    28

    14

  •    

       

        

       

    5/12/2015

    TEC Minus Allowances • For graphical representation, Monitor data are plotted

    as follows:

    Calculated TEC Resolution Allowance

    (6.13 kWh* MP)

    ABC and Sensor

    Incentives

    Enhanced Performance Allowance

    • With the following limit applied:

    Tanh Limit A = Screen Area

    െ 59 0.085ሻ 9 0.0016ܣ ൈ ሺ ݄ܽ݊91 ൈ ݐ

    29

    Draft 2 TEC Requirement

    30

    15

  • 5/12/2015

    Draft 2 TEC Requirement (Less than 22”)

    31

    Draft 2 TEC Requirement • Percentage of Monitors meeting the Total Energy

    Consumption requirement including allowances and incentives

    32

    16

  • 5/12/2015

    Draft 2 Ac-Monitor Brand Partner Representation

    Brand Partner Masked ID

    # of Monitors Meeting Draft 2

    Total Monitors % Meeting

    2 18 104 17% 1 30 101 30% 7 13 101 13%

    56 15 82 18% 27 17 79 22% 32 21 77 27% 41 19 77 25% 46 11 67 16% 10 14 66 21% 49 14 63 22% 14 13 43 30% 40 3 30 10% 44 4 29 14% 9 5 28 18%

    38 8 17 47%

    33

    TEC Allowances and Incentives • May only be applied once

    34

    17

  •                

             

          

              

              

        ‐

    5/12/2015

    Version 6.0 Characteristics of Enhanced Performance Displays (EPDs)

    Contrast ratio of at least 60:1 at

    horizontal viewing angles of at least 85

    degrees

    Total Native Resolution greater than or equal to 2.3 megapixels (MP)

    Color gamut of at least sRGB

    (IEC 61699 2 1)

    • In response to Draft 1, stakeholders commented that: – A majority of the market meets sRGB, so

    Adobe RGB should be the criterion – Models over 27 inches are typically

    higher-end, with better luminance and color performance

    – Draft 1 30% allowance is insufficient for AdobeRGB

    35

    Enhanced Performance Displays

    36

    18

  • 5/12/2015

    19

    Enhanced Performance Displays

    Enhanced Performance Displays

    37

    2 models meet

    38

    11 models meet

  • 5/12/2015

    20

    Enhanced Performance Displays • EPA reviewed the dataset to identify models that offered

    color performance above 100% sRGB – Set a minimum of 96% of Adobe to create a higher

    performance bin (10 models based on Version 6.0 data)

    Models with ≥96% Adobe Color Space

    39

    Enhanced Performance Allowance • In Draft 2, EPA is proposing a tiered allowance

    40

  • 5/12/2015

    21

    Enhanced Performance Allowance (≥96% Adobe)

    Enhanced Performance Allowance (≥99% sRGB)

    41

    25%×TEC

    42

    65%×TEC

  • 5/12/2015

    Draft 2 Enhanced Performance Passing

    ≥ 99% sRGB ≥ 96% Adobe RGB

    All EPD % Res (MP)

    2.074 2.7653.686 8.294 All 2.074

    2.7653.686 8.294 All Size (in)

    22 - 24 100% (2) 100% 100% (1) 50% (2) 67% 80% (4) 50% (3) 24 - 26 40% (5) 40% 100% (1) 100%

    ≥26 12% (17) 83% (6) 30% 50% (6) 50% 34% (10) All 40% 21% 83% 37% 100% 57% 50% 60% 43% (17)

    43

    Further Enhanced Performance Allowance Modifications • To align the pass rate of EPDs with monitors as a whole,

    EPA is considering: – Reducing the allowances for ≥99%sRGB and especially

    96% Adobe RGB – Excluding the resolution allowance before applying the EPD

    allowance:

    ாܧ ൌ 25%65% ൈ ா_ெ்ܧൌ 25%65% ൈ 6.13 ൈ ݎ91 ൈ tanh 0.0016 ൈ ܣ െ 59 0.085 9

    ாܧ ൌ 25%65% ൈ 91 ൈ tanh 0.0016 ൈ ܣ െ 59 0.085 9 44

    22

  • 5/12/2015

    Further Enhanced Performance Allowance Modifications

    45

    Enhanced Performance Brand Representation Brand Partner

    Masked ID

    # of EPD Meeting Draft 2 Total EPD % Meeting

    10 4 8 50% 14 5 6 83% 32 1 5 20% 2 3 4 75% 46 3 4 75% 7 0 4 0% 9 0 3 0% 1 0 2 0% 6 0 2 0% 18 0 1 0% 49 0 1 0% 50 0 1 0%

    46

    23

  • 5/12/2015

    Enhanced Performance Questions • Is there underreporting of models that meet EPD criteria in

    the Version 6.0 dataset? Many non-EPD models appear to meet ≥99% sRGB

    • Is contrast ratio of 60:1 at 85° horizontal viewing angle still representative of high performance?

    • Which delineation for Adobe performance is appropriate? 96%, 99%, 100%... other attributes to consider? What will be the post Adobe color space in common use?

    • Should color or luminance uniformity be taken into consideration?

    • Are there differences in enhanced performance features between models intended for home entertainment versus for professional image production? In other words, will there be EPD for the home/hobbyist market?

    47

    Monitor ABC Incentive • EPA is maintaining the Draft 1 ABC proposal

    48

    24

  • 5/12/2015

    Monitor Ambient Light Conditions • EPA seeks more data on the ambient light settings where

    Monitors typically operate – In particular: office and home conditions

    • 23 ENERGY STAR certified models tested with ABC – 47% average difference between 300 lux and 10 lux

    49

    Sleep Mode • In Draft 1, EPA proposed the following Sleep Mode

    Allowance revisions:

    50

    25

  • 5/12/2015

    Connected Sleep Mode Data • Existing data show bridging and network function are

    well below current V6 allowances – Small difference between connected and non-connected

    Sleep Mode measurements

    Connection Type

    Average of Measured Sleep Mode Power (W)

    Average of Measured Non-Connected Sleep

    Mode Power (W) Difference DisplayPort 0.430 0.460 -0.030 Fast Ethernet 0.390 0.410 -0.020

    Ethernet USB 2.x USB 3.x

    Gigabit 1.163 0.344 0.576

    0.914 0.256 0.413

    0.249 0.088 0.163

    None 0.279 0.164 0.115 Other 0.281 0.190 0.091 ALL 0.314 0.316 -0.002

    51

    Sleep Mode • In Draft 2, EPA is proposing to only provide a TEC

    allowance for Full Network Connectivity if full network connectivity demonstrated using the test method

    • The Draft 1 0.5 W allowance for Full Network Connectivity in Sleep Mode has been converted to 2.9 kWh/year in the TEC allowance

    52

    26

  •  

    5/12/2015

    Full Network Connectivity • Version 6.0 data does not confirm whether the model

    supports Full Network Connectivity – The allowance was not used in the TEC pass rate

    analysis • EPA is proposing allowance based on

    – Network-connected desktops and imaging equipment can Sleep with Wake-On-LAN below 2 W

    – Sep 2013 IEA 4E Standby Power Annex report “Power Requirements for Functions” notes the following power for requirements for efficient networking :

    53

    Ac-dc Loss Conversion Factors • EPA is proposing a 85% efficiency conversion factor for dc

    powered displays – Accounts for losses at the computer power supply and dc-dc

    conversions in the connected computer to permit a fair comparison with ac-powered Displays

    – Based on ENERGY STAR certified computer data – Applying On Mode efficiency conversion for TEC

    • EPA did not receive significant comment on the Draft 1 proposal

    Monitor Mode Typical Computer Load Factor

    On Mode 30% 85% Sleep Mode 6% 81%

    54

    27

  • 5/12/2015

    Standard dc Monitors • Limited data – only seven V6 models tested with a

    USB hub with ac power losses subtracted

    55

    Standard dc Monitors • 5 out of 7 Standard Dc models meet the Draft 2 TEC criteria

    56

    28

  • 5/12/2015

    Webinar Agenda Time Topic 11:00–11:15 Introduction & Test Method Update

    11:15–11:45 Definitions, Scope, General Requirements

    11:45–12:45 Monitors Total Energy Consumption

    12:45–1:15 Signage Displays

    1:15–2:00 Open Discussion, Next Steps

    57

    Signage Displays • There are 157 signage models from 19 manufacturers

    Total Signage Models Bins Maximum Tested Luminance Size

    (inches) 800 All 30-40 14 3 1 0 18 40-50 31 36 14 2 83 50-60 22 21 13 0 56

    All 67 60 28 2 157

    58

    29

  • 5/12/2015

    Power Factor for Signage • EPA is proposing a power factor requirement of 0.7 in

    On Mode for Signage Displays – Signage Displays are typically installed in commercial

    buildings with longer wiring runs – Signage Displays draw higher current than Monitors – Many Signage Displays are capable of meeting the

    requirement

    3.2.3 Signage displays shall have a true power factor in On

    Mode of 0.7 or greater per Part G of Section 5.2 in the ENERGY STAR Test Method.

    59

    Power Factor for Signage

    60

    30

  • 5/12/2015

    Signage Displays • EPA is maintaining the Draft 1 Signage On Mode

    Requirements for Draft 2 – Correction made to the luminance allowance calculation – Stakeholders generally expressed support for the tanh

    and the level set in Draft 1

    61

    Signage Displays Luminance • EPA corrected the luminance power allowance in watts to

    the following calculation:

    7.5 ൈ 10ିହ ൈ ℓ ൈ ܣ – Luminance is Maximum Measured Luminance of the

    display in candelas per square meter, as measured in Section 6.2 of the test method

    – Area is Screen Area in square inches – Uses only measured values as reported per the test method

    – the 7.5 x 10-5 factor takes into the inches to meters conversion

    62

    31

  • 5/12/2015

    Signage Displays

    63

    Signage Displays Meeting 0.7 Power Factor and On Mode Requirements

    % Signage Meeting Draft 1 & 2

    Bins Maximum Tested Luminance Size

    (inches) 800 All 30-40 0% 33% 0% 6% 40-50 32% 25% 43% 0% 30% 50-60 14% 29% 31% 23%

    All 19% 27% 36% 0% 25%

    64

    32

  • 5/12/2015

    Signage Displays Meeting 0.7 Power Factor and On Mode Requirements

    65

    Signage Displays ABC • EPA is proposing the same 5% Automatic Brightness

    Control incentive for both Monitors and Signage Displays

    66

    33

  • PSLEEP_MAX 0.5 WPN 0.5 WPOS 0.3 W

    5/12/2015

    Signage Displays ABC • To verify performance, EPA is proposing Signage with ABC be

    tested at the same ambient light levels (300 lux and 12 lux) as Monitors and demonstrate ≥ 20% difference in On Mode Power – Lack of data and feedback to date to support alternative levels – An ABC sensor should theoretically still perform in a similar

    manner at 12 and 300 lux despite intended operation in brighter or wider range of ambient light conditions

    – Seven V6 Signage models reported with ABC but not enabled

    67

    Signage Displays Sleep Mode

    • EPA is maintaining the Draft 1 Signage Sleep Mode Requirements with a Full Network Connectivity and Occupancy Sensor allowances – Stakeholders did not provide significant comment on the levels

    68

    PSLEEP_MAX 0.5 W PN 0.5 W POS 0.3 W

    34

  • 5/12/2015

    Webinar Agenda

    Time Topic 11:00–11:15 Introduction & Test Method Update

    11:15–11:45 Definitions, Scope, General Requirements

    11:45–12:45 Monitors Total Energy Consumption

    12:45–1:15 Signage Displays 1:15–2:00 Open Discussion, Next Steps

    69

    Open Discussion • DOE and EPA would now like to open up the line for

    any general comments from stakeholders.

    70

    35

  •  

         

    5/12/2015

    Written Comments • In addition to making verbal comments during today’s

    call, stakeholders are encouraged to submit written comments to [email protected].

    Comment Deadline

    Friday, May 22, 2015

    71

    Specification Development Timeline • EPA is proposing the following Version 7.0

    specification development timeline:

    Event Date

    May 22, 2015 Draft 2 Comments Due

    June 2015 Final Draft

    July 2015 Final Specification

    Quarter 1, 2016 Version 7.0 Effective

    72

    36

    mailto:[email protected]

  • 5/12/2015

    Contact Information Please send any additional comments to [email protected].

    For questions regarding the specification, you may contact Verena Radulovic at [email protected] or (202) 343-9845.

    For questions regarding the test procedures, you may contact Jeremy Dommu at [email protected] or (202) 586-9870.

    Thank you for participating!

    www.energystar.gov/productdevelopment 73

    74

    37

    www.energystar.gov/productdevelopmentmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]