Discuss Issues Associated With the Classification And

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Discuss Issues Associated With the Classification And

    1/3

    Discuss issues associated with the classification

    and/or diagnosis of schizophrenia (8marks + 16

    marks)

    AO1

    1.Outline DSM-IV & ICD-102.Inter-reliability3.Subjectivity4.Labelling

    5.Comorbidity6.Stigmatisation

    AO2

    Rosenhans study MUST link to each of above Becks study

    Implications

    Evaluation of research (MUST LINK!)

    Could mention DSM V vs NIMH (NationalInstitute of Mental Health refusing to fund DSM

    V and are proposing a fairer alternative that

    addresses issues raised above. This has major

    implications for Psychology as practitioners will

    need retraining etc however, a fairer system

    will be of more benefit to patients and prevent

    misdiagnosis etc).

  • 7/30/2019 Discuss Issues Associated With the Classification And

    2/3

    The main tools used for the diagnosis of schizophrenia are the DSM-IVcriteria, which are in its fourth edition, and the ICD-10, which is produced bythe world health organisation and is in its 10th edition. The two methods areoften used alongside each other.

    However there are several issues associated with the classification anddiagnosis of schizophrenia. Firstly the reliability of the ICD and the DSM canbe questioned because even though they provide a fast and easy way tobreak down the symptoms, treatments and prognoses of disorders, their inter-rater reliability is low. This concerns the extent to which two or morediagnosticians would at the same conclusions when faced with exactly thesame individual and in many studies inter-rater reliability has been shown tobe quite low.

    This issue is backed up by research for example, Beck et al found that outof 154 patients, only 2 psychiatrists only agreed on the diagnosis of 54% ofthe individuals. These findings are staggering and show that a lack of

    reliability is a huge issue in diagnosis which means that there is danger thatpatients will be misdiagnosed and may consequently be prescribed drugs thatare not suited to their condition and result in irreversible side effects.

    Furthermore the behaviour of the individual is open to interpretation, theprocess is subjective. This could lead to the miss-diagnosis of millions ofpeople, causing them to be labelled for the rest of their life even if they do notsuffer form the disorder they have been diagnosed with. This therefore meansthat the process raises some ethical concerns. In addition, misdiagnosis may

    result in a self-fulfilling prophecy may then also take place which is where thesufferer who has been diagnosed believes that they do have the disorder.

    Secondly many disorders described in the diagnostic manuals overlap,leading to a lot of patients being diagnosed with a co-morbid disorder, thismay be because many individuals dont fit neatly into one single category sothey are diagnosed with two different disorders.

    All of these issues were highlighted in Rosenhans study on sane in insaneplaces,. Procedures, findings, conclusions implications.

  • 7/30/2019 Discuss Issues Associated With the Classification And

    3/3

    Thirdly cultural relativism is another problem associated with the diagnosis ofschizophrenia; every culture will see the symptoms of a mental disorder in adifferent way. For example in Asian cultures, a person experiencing someemotional turmoil is praised and rewarded if they show no expression of theiremotions, whereas, in Western cultures this would be seen as abnormal

    behaviour. As a result the newer versions of the DSM and ICD attempt tohighlight and deal with the issue of cultural differences between both sub-cultures within our society and cultures around the world.

    Co-morbidity is another problem associated with the diagnosis ofschizophrenia; this is where two mental health disorders seem to occurtogether, for example schizophrenia and depression. This can lead to thewrong diagnosis being made as the boundary between schizophrenia anddepression is blurred with many of the symptoms being the same. Again there

    is the problem of subjectivity as it is down the mental health professional todiagnose the individual, and this diagnosis may be wrong. Furthermore theDSM and ICD have very similar approaches to the classification anddiagnosis of schizophrenia, agreeing on the symptoms and characteristics.

    However Schneider proposed a different approach to the diagnosis ofschizophrenia. He argued that it was the nature of the symptom that woulddetermine whether a person was schizophrenic, not just the fact that they hadthe symptom. For example he studied the types of hallucinations thatschizophrenia sufferers would be afflicted with and made a group of first ranksymptoms that were used to distinguish schizophrenia from other psychoticdisorders. Finally to diagnose a mental disorder, interaction between a healthcare professional and the potential patient must take place. This raisesanother issue in terms of culture; the clinician may not speak the samelanguage as the patient therefore making it impossible for the patient todescribe the symptoms and for the clinician to diagnose the patient. This maylead to a miss-diagnosis, and therefore a translator would be needed.

    Conclusion reductionism, beta bias, (objective attempted

    standardisation trained professionals)

    Also must include detailed account of Rosenhans study and explainwhich issues are highlighted within this.