Discovering the Next Generation of Library Search

Paul PivalPublic Services Systems Librarianppival@ucalgary.ca

David BrownHead of Systemsdkbrown@ucalgary.ca

Aaron WoodMetadata LibrarianAssistant Head, Technical Servicesaawood@ucalgary.ca

Alberta Library Conference 2010Jasper Park Lodge,Jasper, ABApril 30, 2010

Albert Szent-Gyorgyi

Academic Digital Libraries of the Future: an Environment ScanLaw, Derek (2009) New Review of Academic Librarianship, 15:1, 53-67.

What do our librarians think?

•Really depends on the discipline

•Most don’t teach it

•They see improvement since launch

•They think it’s better than Federated

Search

What do our users think?

I found Summon easy to use

I was able to find relevant information on my research topic

I would recommend this search service to a friend or colleague

If it was available in the future, I would start my research with Summon

Are you…

Getting local records into Summon•Things to think about.

Kinds of loading•MARC records•Harvesting via OAI-PMH•XML files

MARC Records•Unique record key

▫Linking back to Catalogue▫Updating or deleting records

•Local data not in Bibliographic record▫Call number▫Branch▫Holdings

Handling Additions and Deletions

OAI-PMH•Better handling of additions and deletions•Is the meaning of the metatdata clear

outside of its context?•How complete is harvested metadata?

Web-Scale Discovery

Problematic

Yet Enticing

University of Calgary’s metadata record counts in Summon:

• Over 2,270,000 MARC records• Just under 16,000 simple Dublin Core records from its

institutional repository (DSpace)• Over 79,000 simple Dublin Core records from its local

digitized collections (CONTENTdm and an in-house developed system)

• 3,931 records describing cultural objects from its museum collection

• 268 RAD-compliant xml records representing archival holdings

The Problem: An Unbalanced Scale

Full text vendor xml records

Local collection metadata records: MARC, DC, EAD, etc.

Solution?

Through considering what the user-oriented goals of unified discovery services are:

• Facets met through leveraging available metadata?

• Increased access points with more detailed information on individual search results met through merging metadata records for the same resource, i.e., normalization?

The Importance of Facets?

•‘...facets help end users refine searches, navigate, browse and manage large results sets’ (Calhoun, Online Catalogs, v)

• ‘More Intuitive Searching: less complicated initial searches, less pre-limiting, more post-limits via faceting...’ (Harper, 11)

• ‘Improved search of catalog and local resources: keyword, facets, visualization’ (Burke, 28)

MARC Mapping:

Enhanced MARC Mapping:

Eg., Content Type Facet

Increased Access Points and ClarityMORE:• hypertext links to resources and

supplementary information,•subject information, •tables of contents, •abstracts and summaries, •and any other details available

Current ExamplesPrimo

(Harper, 20)

OCLC

(Calhoun , RDA and OCLC,10)

Exert Pressure

Collaborate

Respect Standards

Look both Within and Outside Libraries

Web-Scale Discovery

Works CitedBurke, Jane. “Discovery versus Disintermediation.” XXIX Annual Charleston

Conference: Issues in Book and Serial Acquisitions: Necessity Is the Mother of Invention. 6 Nov. 2009. Online 30 Nov. 2009. <http://www.katina.info/ conference/2009presentations/Fri815_Burke.ppt>

Calhoun, Karen, et al. “Online Catalogs: What Users and Librarians Want: An OCLC Report.” OCLC Online Computer Library Center. 3 Mar. 2009. Online. 15 Dec. 2009. <http://www.oclc.org/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdf>.

Calhoun, Karen, et al. “RDA and OCLC.” OCLC Online Computer Library Center. 30 Oct. 2009. Online. 15 Dec. 2009. < http://www5.oclc.org/downloads/webinars/RDA_09Oct30_slides.ppt>.

De Groat, Great. “Future Directions in Metadata Remediation for Metadata Aggregators.” Digital Library Federation. Feb. 2009. Online. 5 Jul. 2009. <http://www.diglib.org/aquifer/dlf110.pdf >.

Harper, Corey. “Metadata Normalization: A Case Study in Primo and Linked Open Data in Libraries.” Metadata Working Group Forum, Cornell. 16 May 2008. Online 12 Dec. 2009. < http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/bitstream/ 1813/10920/1/harper_cornell20080516.ppt>

“MARC Mapping to MODS: Version 3.3.” Library of Congress. May 2008. Online. 27 Jun. 2008. <http://loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-mapping.html>

Further ReadingBollier, David. “The Promise and Peril of Big Data.” Aspen Institute. 2010. Online. 3

Jan. 2010. <http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs/ InfoTech09.pdf>

Boock, Michael, Fary Chadwell, and Terry Reese. “WorldCat Local Task Force: Report to LAMP.” Oregon State University Libraries. 2 Apr. 2009. Online. 12 Dec. 2009. <http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/jspui/bitstream/1957/11167/1/Worldcat% 20local%20task%20force%20report_cost%20redacted.pdf>.

Coyle, Karen. “The Library Catalog: Some Possible Futures.” Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33.3 (May 2007): 414-416. ScienceDirect. University of Calgary Libraries, Calgary, AB. 4 Nov. 2009. <http://sciencedirect.com>.

Debenham, John, and Carles Sierra. “Merging Intelligent Agency and the Semantic Web.” Knowledge-Based Systems, 21.3 (Apr. 2008): 184-191. ScienceDirect. University of Calgary Libraries, Calgary, AB. 12 Dec. 2009. <http:sciencedirect.com>.

“The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery.” Microsoft Research. 2009. Online. 3 Jan. 2010. < http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/UM/redmond/about/ collaboration/fourthparadigm/4th_PARADIGM_BOOK_complete_HR.pdf>.

Gavrilis, Dimitris, Constantia Kakali, and Christos Papatheodorou. “Enhancing Library Services with Web 2.0 Functionalities.” Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. SpringerLink, 2008. University of Calgary Libraries, Calgary, AB. 23 Jul. 2009. <http://springerlink.com>.

Lauridsen, Helle, and Graham Stone. “The 21st-Century Library: A Whole New Ball Game?” Serials, 22.2 (Jul. 2009): 141-145. MetaPress. University of Calgary Libraries, Calgary, AB. 3 Jan. 2010. <http:metapress.com>.

Mayfield, Ian, and Linda Humphreys. “Next-Generaton Library Catalogues: Reviews of ELIN, WorldCat Local and Aquabrowser.” Serials, 21.3 (Nov. 2008): 224-230. MetaPress. University of Calgary Libraries, Calgary, AB. 13 Dec. 2009. <http:metapress.com>.

Patel, Chintan O, and James J. Cimino. “Using Semantic and Structural Properties of the Unified Medical Language System to Discover Potential Terminological Relationships.” Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 16.3 (May/Jun. 2009): 346-353. BMJ Journals. University of Calgary Libraries,Calgary, AB. 13 Dec. 2009. <http://jamia.bmj.com>.

Schaffner, Jennifer. “The Metadata Is the Interface: Better Description for Better Discovery of Archives and Special Collections.” OCLC Online Computer Library Center. 2009. Online. 5 Jul. 2009. <http://oclc.org/research/publications/ library/2009/2009-06.pdf>.

Simpson, Betsy. “Collections Define Cataloging’s Future.” Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33.4 (Jul. 2007): 507-511. ScienceDirect. University of Calgary Libraries, Calgary, AB. 4 Nov. 2009. <http://sciencedirect.com>.

Stevenson, Karen. “Next-Generaton Library Catalogues: Reviews of Encore, Primo, Summon and Summa.” Serials, 22.1 (Mar. 2009): 68-82. MetaPress. University of Calgary Libraries, Calgary, AB. 13 Dec. 2009. <http:metapress.com>.