Upload
hollee-wiley
View
38
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster ( Crassostrea virginica ) health and abundance. Melanie L. Parker and William S. Arnold FWC - Fish & Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue SE St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727-896-8626 [email protected]. Water Flow in Florida. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Direct vs. indirect impacts of salinity on oyster (Crassostrea virginica)
health and abundance
Melanie L. Parker and William S. ArnoldFWC - Fish & Wildlife Research Institute
100 Eighth Avenue SESt. Petersburg, FL 33701
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District
Water Flow in Florida
Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP)
• CERP implemented as a means of reinitiating natural freshwater flow to both coasts of south Florida
• Monitoring component of CERP addresses impacts of changed FW flow on the flora and fauna
• Eastern oyster chosen as a target species for CERP
Study Sites
• IMPACTED SITES
St. Lucie Estuary
Loxahatchee River
Lake Worth Lagoon
Biscayne Bay
• CONTROL SITES
Tampa Bay
Mosquito Lagoon
Sebastian River
Mosquito Lagoon
• Pristine environment
• Located within Canaveral National Seashore
• Few anthropogenic or freshwater inputs
Mosquito Lagoon Stations
1
3
2
St. Lucie Estuary
• Urban environment
• Increasing levels of development, industry and agriculture
• Flood control canals and drainage ditches
St. Lucie Estuary
• Exposed to altered patterns of water quantity and quality– excess wet season
flows– insufficient dry
season flows– extreme salinity
fluctuations– High sediment and
pollutant inputs
St. Lucie Stations
North
South
Central
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
Salinity Patterns Mosquito Lagoon
0
10
20
30
40
50
St. Lucie-North
0
10
20
30
40
50
St. Lucie-South
Date
Jan 2
005
Mar
200
5
May
200
5
Jul 2
005
Sep 2
005
Nov 20
05
Jan 2
006
Mar
200
6
May
200
6
Jul 2
006
Sep 2
006
Nov 20
06
Sal
init
y
0
10
20
30
40
50
St. Lucie-Central
0
10
20
30
40
50
Juvenile Recruitment
• Monthly sampling
• 3 replicate spat arrays at each station
• Count live oysters on underside of each strung shell
Juvenile Recruitment
St. Lucie-South
DateJa
n 200
5
Mar
200
5
May
200
5
Jul 2
005
Sep 2
005
Nov 20
05
Jan 2
006
Mar
200
6
May
200
6
Jul 2
006
Sep 2
006
Nov 20
06
Mea
n S
pat
/Sh
ell
0
5
10
15
20
Sal
init
y
0
10
20
30
40
50
Mosquito Lagoon
0
5
10
15
20
0
10
20
30
40
50
St. Lucie-North
0
5
10
15
20
0
10
20
30
40
50
St. Lucie-Central
0
5
10
15
20
0
10
20
30
40
50
Spat/ShellSalinity
Abundance and Distribution
• Twice per year
• 10 replicate 1-m2 quadrats at each station
• Count total live and dead oysters
• Measure SH of 50 live oysters
Abundance and Distribution
Site
ML SL-N SL-C SL-S
Mea
n S
H (
mm
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
ML SL-N SL-C SL-S
Sal
init
y
0
10
20
30
40
50
ML SL-N SL-C SL-S
Mea
n L
ive
Oys
ters
/m2
0
100
200
300
400
500
Winter 2005Summer 2005Spring 2006Fall 2006
Perkinsus marinus (Dermo)
• Monthly sampling
• Collect and dissect 15 oysters from each site
• Process gill and mantle tissues with RFTM
• Parasite density ranked with Mackin scale
St. Lucie-Central
Date
0
20
40
60
80
100
Infe
ctio
n In
ten
sity
0
1
2
3
4
5
Per
cen
t In
fect
ed a
nd
Sal
init
y
0
10
20
30
40
50
% Infected
Infection IntensitySalinity
Mosquito Lagoon
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
10
20
30
40
50
No oysters collected fromJuly 2005 through April 2006
Perkinsus marinus (Dermo)
Summary
Mosquito Lagoon St. Lucie estuary
Mean Max Min Mean Max Min
Salinity 33.6 42.4 26.1 11.1 29.5 0.20
Mean S.D. % Mean S.D. %
Recruitment 1.35 2.52 0.28 1.10
Density 43.0 53.3 96.2 144.4
Shell Height 53.0 26.3 28.4 8.7
Dermo 0.43 0.71 46 0.05 0.25 9
Conclusions
• The prevalence and intensity of dermo infection is greater at the high salinity Mosquito Lagoon site than at the more variable salinity St. Lucie site
• Nevertheless, oysters in Mosquito Lagoon exhibit higher recruitment rates and less variable adult populations relative to the St. Lucie estuary
• The indirect (negative) effects of salinity appear to exceed the direct effects of dermo on oyster health and abundance in east coast Florida waters
• In FLORIDA SOUTHEAST COAST ESTUARIES,it may be premature to conduct oyster reef rebuilding operations until freshwater entering those estuaries is properly managed
Questions?