Upload
others
View
13
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What’s the evidence base for heart failure diagnosis & management in the guideline
updates?
Frans Rutten, general practitioner Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary care
University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
EPCCS summit Prague 2015
‘The very essence of cardiovascular practice
is recognition of early heart failure’
Sir Thomas Lewis – 1933
An iceberg!
25%
asymptomatic ventricular dysfunction
heart failure treated in primary care
heart failure treated by hospital specialists
unknown heart failure (although symptoms!)
Hoes et al. Eur Heart J 1998;19:L2-
Early detection is crucial
1. case-finding in high-risk groups (e.g. COPD, type 2 DM)
2. diagnosing / recognition in those presenting complaints
- older patients often do not visit doctors with HF complaints
“part of ageing”
- doctors often do not recognise HF at consultations
atypical presentation, co-morbidity
- patients usually presented to primary care/non-cardiologists
Example of early diagnosis: UHFO-DD study
Optimal diagnostic strategy in primary care?
• 728 suspected patients in primary care (non-acute onset)
• mean age 71 yrs
• diagnostic out-patient clinics in 8 hospitals
• diagnostic cocktail plus 6 months follow-up
• reference standard expert panel: 28% heart failure
Kelder et al. Circulation 2011; 124:2865-
example of case-finding; in type 2 diabetes
• 605 patients > 60 years
• 31% heart failure (of which 87% unknown)
• unknown heart failure: 83% HFpEF !!!
Boonman-de Winter et al, Diabetologia 2012;55:2154
A diagnostic algorithm: MICE rulereferral for echocardiography in suspected HF
Roalfe et al. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:1000
MICE: Male, Infarction, Crepitations, Edema
Definition of heart failure (HFrEF and HFpEF)
abnormality of cardiac structure or function
leading to
failure of the heart to deliver oxygen at a rate commensurate with the requirements of the
metabolizing tissues
Fluid overload compensation reduced oxygen delivery (‘backward failure’) adaptation (‘forward failure’)
Does wheezing fit with asthma or COPD?
35% of elderly with acute HF wheeze at initial presentation
Risk of overdiagnosing COPD
Jorge S et al. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2007;7:16
COPD (GOLD-criteria) = Obstruction on spirometry
= FEV1/FVC <70% (or LLN)
• non-acute HF: both FEV1 and FVC decreased with 20%
• If fluid overloaded: FEV1 more reduced than FVC
• HF with increased interstitial pulmonary fluid pressure:
pulmonary obstruction with spirometry !!
reason of overdiagnosing COPD
• better: bodyplethysmography (RV/TLC)
Gueder G, et al. J Card Fail 2012;18:637-644
pitfall with spirometry if shortness of breath
Most important clinical variables for diagnosis
• History: ischaemic heart disease, type 2 DM, hypertension
• Symptoms: breathlessness, fatigue, ankle oedema
• More typical symptoms: orthopnoea/parox noct dyspnoea
• Signs:
fluid: pulmonary crepitations, ankle oedema, JVP
adaptation: displaced apex beat, tachycardia, murmur
Palpation apical impulse
(NTpro)BNP tests: why difference in exclusionary cut points in acute vs. non acute setting?
Differences in prior change (prevalence)
Difference in severity of disease
different patient profile
Other
Positive predictive values
Negative predictive values
Sensitivity
Specificity
BNP in 1872 patients suspected of non-acute HF
NT-proBNP in 1297 patients suspected of non-acute HF
Causes for elevated NTproBNP
acute dyspnoea slow onset dyspnoea
• ACS age >75 jaar
• pulmonary embolism atrial fibrillation
• acute renal failure renal impairment
• pulmonary arterial hypertension LVH
• sepsis severe COPD
Conclusions diagnosis and case-finding
• signs & symptoms & history: more accurate than often believed
• So…use eyes, ears, hands, and stethoscope
• Wheezing doesn’t mean COPD or asthma! Do not refer wrong!
• additional tests: natriuretic peptides most valuable
• Tools: diagnostic score / algorithm available for daily practice
• Still barriers to echocardiography in primary care
• Spirometry only when stable, euvolemic
• High risk patients (e.g. type 2 DM, COPD) profit from case-finding
Pre-hospital treatment options in suspectected AHF
• furosemide 40 mg iv
• when oxygen saturation <92%: 2 l/min oxygen in COPD
• when severe dyspnoea/agitation: 5 mg morphine slowly iv
• when systolic > 110 mmHg: nitroglycerine sublingual
McMurray JJ, et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14:803-869
Biological Concept: Rationale for Dual
Acting Therapy with ARNI: LCZ696
NEP iVasodilation
$Blood pressure$ Sympathetic tone$Aldosterone levels
NatriuresisDiuresis
$Blood pressure
ValsartanVasodilation
$Sympathetic tone$Aldosterone levels$Sodium retention$Cellular growth
Biological Concept
Inactive fragments
NEP
Diuresis/NatriuresisANP/BNP
Blood Vessels VasoconstrictionVasodilation
Ang IIAng I FragmentsNEP
Comparison and results PARADIGM 2014
• Angiotensin-Neprilysin inhibition (ARNI) vs. enalapril (10 mg b.d.)
• In 8442 symptomatic patients HFrEF, LVEF<40%, BNP >150 pg/ml, on ACE-I or ARB, mean age 63.8 yrs, 21% females
• Stopped early, FU 27 months
• Background medication:
Diuretics 80%
BB 93%
MRA 55%
• Composite mortality from CV cause + hospitalization for HF
• Composite : 21.8% vs. 26.5% (ARR 4.7%; RRR 20%)
• All cause mortality: 17.0% vs. 19.8% (HR 0.84; NNT 32)
Can we supplant ACE-I or ARB by ARNI?
• In those who showed to be tolerant to ACE-I or ARB
• Run in; 20% dropped out
• As to be expected: not many adverse effects
• Enalapril 10 mg b.d not equipotent to valsartan 160 mg in LCZ696
• One swallow doesn’t make a summer..
Drug treatment of HFpEF
Diuretics if fluid overloaded: symptom relieve
Blood pressure management
PEP-CHF ACE-inhibitor
I-PRESERVE ARB
ALDO-DHF/TOPCAT MRA
PARAMOUNT ARNI
Ongoing:
PARAGON ARNI vs valsartan
TOPCAT
HR = 0.89 (0.77 – 1.04)
p=0.138
TOPCAT: Primary Outcome
Spironolactone
Placebo
351/1723 (20.4%)
320/1722 (18.6%)
Pitt B, et al. New Engl J Med. 2014;370:1383-92
TOPCAT
HR=0.82 (0.69-0.98)
HR=1.10 (0.79-1.51)
Interaction p=0.122
US, Canada, Argentina, Brazil
Russia, Rep Georgia
Placebo:280/881 (31.8%)
Placebo:71/842 (8.4%)
Interaction by region !!
Denmark 2012
Similar results with COACH-2 in the Netherlands
Similar results with COACH-2 in the Netherlands
The Netherlands 2012
Mean age 82.3 years
In last year: 0.4 times visits to cardiology OPC
12.1 home visits by GP
55.9% died at home or home for the elderly
32.6% died in hospital (in total 5.8% on cardiology ward)
Cause of death:
28% sudden death
23% progressive HF
20% cancer
29% others
Death
High
LowMany years
Function
Death
High
LowMonths or years
Function
Organ failure
6
Acute2 7
Death
High
LowWeeks, months, years
Function
5GP has 20
deaths per
list of 2000
patients
per
year
Primary care can deliver end of life care for all in need
Individual disease trajectory heart failure
Conclusions treatment/palliative care
• Treatment should start upstream
• HFrEF; (diuretics), ACE-i/ARB, beta-blockers, MRA
• ARNI’s: upcoming for HFrEF
• HFpEF patients will ‘love you” if you titrate diuretics adequately
• Consider spironolacton, certainly if blood pressure is high
• Cooperative care is a good option
• Last year of life/palliative care: the GP is ‘in the lead’